Next Article in Journal
Advances in Surface Functionalization of Lithium Battery Separators and Their In-Service Process Damage Behavior
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Characterization of Urethane Acrylate Resin Based on 1,3-Propanediol for Coating Applications
Previous Article in Journal
How do Graphene Composite Surfaces Affect the Development and Structure of Marine Cyanobacterial Biofilms?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Coatings
Volume 12
Issue 11
10.3390/coatings12111777
coatings-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Marginal Adaptation and Internal Fit of 3D-Printed Provisional Crowns and Fixed Dental Prosthesis Resins Compared to CAD/CAM-Milled and Conventional Provisional Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

by
Mohammed Hussain Dafer Al Wadei
1,
Mohammed E. Sayed
2,3,*,
Saurabh Jain
2,*,
Aparna Aggarwal
4,
Hatem Alqarni
5,
Shilpi Gilra Gupta
6,
Saeed M. Alqahtani
7,
Nasser M. Alahmari
7,
Abdullah Hasan Alshehri
7,
Meena Jain
8,
Abrar A. Ageeli
9,
Saad Saleh AlResayes
10,
Samar Alghamdi
11,
Alhanouf K. Alnajdi
12 and
Mafaz M. Gharawi
12
1
Department of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia
3
Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07103, USA
4
Vitaldent Advanced Dental Clinic, Faridabad 121002, India
5
Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh 14611, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Prosthodontics, Government College of Dentistry, Indore 452001, India
7
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia
8
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Manav Rachna Dental College, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad 121004, India
9
Specialty Dental Center, Ministry of Health, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia
10
Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia
11
Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 22252, Saudi Arabia
12
College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2022, 12(11), 1777; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12111777
Submission received: 25 October 2022 / Revised: 17 November 2022 / Accepted: 17 November 2022 / Published: 20 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surface Modifications and Coatings for Implantable Biomaterials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the marginal fit and internal adaptation of provisional crowns and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) fabricated using 3D-printing resins and compared them with those fabricated by CAD/CAM (computer-aided designing/computer-aided manufacturing) milling and conventional resins. The null hypotheses tested were that there would be no differences in the marginal fit and internal adaptation of 3D-printed provisional crowns and FDP resins when compared to CAD/CAM-milled and conventional provisional resins. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to construct this systematic review. The focused PICO/PECO (Population, Intervention/Exposure, Comparison, Outcome) question was “Do provisional crowns and FDPs (P) fabricated by 3D-printing (I) have similar marginal adaptation and internal fit (O) when compared to those fabricated by CAD/CAM milling and conventional techniques (C)?”. The protocol used for this systematic review was pre-registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Electronic databases (e.g., MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science (Core Collection)) were systematically searched for indexed English literature published up to June 2022. In the initial electronic search of the selected databases, 519 articles were identified. Duplicates were removed, and screening was performed to select the articles that met the preset inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies were selected for qualitative analysis, but only ten of them provided comparative data and were selected for quantitative analysis. The modified CONSORT scale was used for qualitative analysis, and most of the included studies were rated to be of moderate quality. Based on the findings, it could be concluded that provisional crowns and FDPs fabricated from 3D-printing resins have a superior marginal fit and internal adaptation when compared to CAD/CAM-milled and conventional provisional resins; thus, they can be used as a dependable alternative to other resins.
Keywords: PMMA; bis-acrylic resin; 3D printing; CAD/CAM; milling; provisional crowns; provisional fixed dental prosthesis; interim restoration; marginal fit; marginal adaptation; internal fit; internal adaptation; temporary crown; temporary fixed dental prosthesis PMMA; bis-acrylic resin; 3D printing; CAD/CAM; milling; provisional crowns; provisional fixed dental prosthesis; interim restoration; marginal fit; marginal adaptation; internal fit; internal adaptation; temporary crown; temporary fixed dental prosthesis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al Wadei, M.H.D.; Sayed, M.E.; Jain, S.; Aggarwal, A.; Alqarni, H.; Gupta, S.G.; Alqahtani, S.M.; Alahmari, N.M.; Alshehri, A.H.; Jain, M.; et al. Marginal Adaptation and Internal Fit of 3D-Printed Provisional Crowns and Fixed Dental Prosthesis Resins Compared to CAD/CAM-Milled and Conventional Provisional Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Coatings 2022, 12, 1777. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12111777

AMA Style

Al Wadei MHD, Sayed ME, Jain S, Aggarwal A, Alqarni H, Gupta SG, Alqahtani SM, Alahmari NM, Alshehri AH, Jain M, et al. Marginal Adaptation and Internal Fit of 3D-Printed Provisional Crowns and Fixed Dental Prosthesis Resins Compared to CAD/CAM-Milled and Conventional Provisional Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Coatings. 2022; 12(11):1777. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12111777

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al Wadei, Mohammed Hussain Dafer, Mohammed E. Sayed, Saurabh Jain, Aparna Aggarwal, Hatem Alqarni, Shilpi Gilra Gupta, Saeed M. Alqahtani, Nasser M. Alahmari, Abdullah Hasan Alshehri, Meena Jain, and et al. 2022. "Marginal Adaptation and Internal Fit of 3D-Printed Provisional Crowns and Fixed Dental Prosthesis Resins Compared to CAD/CAM-Milled and Conventional Provisional Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" Coatings 12, no. 11: 1777. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12111777

APA Style

Al Wadei, M. H. D., Sayed, M. E., Jain, S., Aggarwal, A., Alqarni, H., Gupta, S. G., Alqahtani, S. M., Alahmari, N. M., Alshehri, A. H., Jain, M., Ageeli, A. A., AlResayes, S. S., Alghamdi, S., Alnajdi, A. K., & Gharawi, M. M. (2022). Marginal Adaptation and Internal Fit of 3D-Printed Provisional Crowns and Fixed Dental Prosthesis Resins Compared to CAD/CAM-Milled and Conventional Provisional Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Coatings, 12(11), 1777. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12111777

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop