Next Article in Journal
Nanomaterial-Based Sensors for Exhaled Breath Analysis: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Structure and Mechanical Properties of Porous TiNi Alloys with Ag Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Special Issue: Multi-Functional Nanostructured Sustainable Coatings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hydrothermal Synthesis of Nitrogen-Doped and Excitation-Dependent Carbon Quantum Dots for Selective Detection of Fe3+ in Blood Plasma
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An In Vitro Study of the Antifungal Efficacy of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles against Saccharomyces cerevisiae

by
Eng Pei Tan
1,
Sinouvassane Djearamane
1,*,
Ling Shing Wong
2,*,
Ranjithkumar Rajamani
3,
Anto Cordelia Tanislaus Antony
4,*,
Suresh Kumar Subbaih
5,
Ashok Kumar Janakiraman
6,
Mohammod Aminuzzaman
4,7,
Vetriselvan Subramaniyan
8,
Mahendran Sekar
9 and
Siddharthan Selvaraj
10
1
Department of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kampar 31900, Malaysia
2
Life Science Division, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia
3
Viyen Biotech LLP, Coimbatore 641031, India
4
Department of Chemical Science, Faculty of Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kampar 31900, Malaysia
5
Centre for Materials Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai 600126, India
6
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, USCI University, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
7
Centre for Photonics and Advanced Materials Research (CPAMR), Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR), Sungai Long Campus, Kajang 43000, Malaysia
8
Faculty of Medicine, Bioscience and Nursing, MAHSA University, Kuala Lumpur 42610, Malaysia
9
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Royal College of Medicine Perak, Universiti Kuala Lumpur, Ipoh 30450, Malaysia
10
Faculty of Dentistry, AIMST University, Bedong 08100, Malaysia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2022, 12(12), 1988; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12121988
Submission received: 20 September 2022 / Revised: 8 November 2022 / Accepted: 17 November 2022 / Published: 19 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanoparticles for Energy, Sensing and Biomedical Applications)

Abstract

:
Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) are widely used in biomedical applications due to their antimicrobial and antioxidant properties. The objective of the present study was to determine the antifungal activity of ZnO NPs against the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The turbidity test results showed a significant (p < 0.05) dose-dependent growth inhibitory effect of ZnO NPs on S. cerevisiae as the growth inhibition increased from 7.04 ± 0.64 to 70.30 ± 3.19% as the concentration of ZnO NPs increased from 5 to 150 μg/mL. The scanning microscopy images evidenced the morphological alterations such as regional invagination, pitting, cracks, wrinkles, and cell wall rupture in the yeast cells treated with ZnO NPs. In addition, the FTIR spectrum revealed the possible involvement of hydroxyl, alkene, amides, carbonyl, and phosphate groups from polysaccharides, polypeptides, phospholipids, and ergosterol of the yeast cells wall for binding of ZnO NPs on the cell surface. The present study has demonstrated the antifungal activity of ZnO NPs on S. cerevisiae through growth inhibition and the morphological damages resulting from the treatment of ZnO NPs.

1. Introduction

Contagious diseases caused by fungi pose serious health threat to humans, and the incidence of fungal infections have been rising, despite the substantial progress achieved in the treatment and management of fungal infections [1]. Invasive fungal infections bring significant burden to healthcare systems with high morbidity and mortality rates, especially among immunocompromised patients, such as patients with Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), organ transplantation, or cancer patients with chemotherapy. The currently available major antifungal agents have limitations in terms of clinical efficacy and efficiency, resistance mechanisms, and toxicity of the compounds due to the similarities between the fungi and human cells. Hence, it is of utmost importance to explore an alternative agent which not only fights against fungal infections but also prevents drug resistance [2,3,4].
Nanoscience and technology have played a vital role in the development of multiple fields ranging from engineering to biomedicine. Specifically, nanomaterials have been broadly applied in numerous industries due to their unique size- and shape-dependent physical, chemical, and biological properties [5,6,7,8]. Moreover, numerous metallic nanoparticles are widely believed to have antimicrobial properties against bacteria and fungi and also now used as surface coating materials in many medical devices to control the spread of infectious agents [9,10,11]. The usage of inorganic nanomaterials has attracted a considerable interest, owing primarily to their consistent antimicrobial activity on pathogenic microorganisms, which has been demonstrated to be effective even at low concentrations [12,13]. It is an emerging strategy to utilize the evolving nanoparticles as a base for successful treatment of infectious diseases by overcoming the antimicrobial resistance. Metal oxide nanoparticles, such as zinc oxide, silver, and titanium nanoparticles, have been proven to have microbicidal properties through the excess production of reactive oxygen species and damaging the microbial membrane, making them favorable to be used as an efficient antimicrobial agent [14,15].
Recent reports indicate that zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) are considered as a next-generation nano-antimicrobial agent against human pathogenic multi-drug-resistant bacteria and fungi [16]. Much more focus and work are required urgently for the novel approaches to identify effective new antimicrobial agents, both selective and broad spectrum, to sustainably combat antimicrobial resistance [17,18]. ZnO NPs have been studied and utilized in several biomedical applications, such as anti-aging, bio-imaging, drug delivery, and antimicrobial agent, to treat various skin infections [19,20,21]. According to previous research, ZnO NPs have significant antifungal activities against Botrytis cinerea and Penicillium expansum, and the inhibitory effects increased as ZnO NPs concentrations increased [22]. These nanoparticles also have a large surface area to volume proportion and show unique physicochemical properties, such as porosity, crystallinity, particle size, and morphology, which are highly accounted for the biomedical applications. In addition, the scientific toxicity studies indicate that the ZnO NP is a preferable option as an antimicrobial agent because it has low toxicity and is compatible with humans while toxic to microorganisms [23].
Fungal infections have emerged as a significant health issue associated to an increasing number of people who have immune system deficiencies. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a unicellular fungus, which is related with infections ranging from vaginitis in healthy patients and cutaneous infections, to systemic bloodstream infections and infections of essential organs, such as lungs, esophagus, peritoneum, urinary tract, etc., in immunocompromised and critically ill patients. However, much less effort has been made to investigate the response of S. cerevisiae to antifungal treatment. Remarkably, the genetic tractability of S. cerevisiae has made it a model organism for the study of fundamental issues in fungal biology [24,25]. Hence, in this work, we investigated the effect of ZnO NPs on the growth and surface morphology of S. cerevisiae. The findings of the study might be helpful to incorporate and utilize ZnO NPs as an antifungal agent in treating the infections caused by S. cerevisiae.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Characterization of ZnO NPs

Chemically synthesized ZnO nanopowder (particle size < 100 nm) was acquired from Sigma-Aldrich. The surface morphology and average particle size were identified using Scanning Electron Microscope with Energy Dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX) (JSM-6701F, JOEL, Tokyo, Japan) with a working distance of 4.7 mm and an acceleration voltage of 4 kV. The elemental composition of the ZnO nanopowder was confirmed by EDX spectrum. The X-ray diffractometer (XRD) (Lab X, SHIMADZU, XRD-6000, Tokyo, Japan), operated at an angle of 2θ with 40 V and 30 mA current, was applied to confirm the crystalline nature and crystalline size of the nanomaterial. Further, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Perkin-Elmer Spectrum RX1, Waltham, MA, USA) was performed to confirm the chemical composition of ZnO NPs.

2.2. Preparation of ZnO NPs Suspension

The stock solution of ZnO NPs (300 μg/mL) was prepared in Sabouraud Dextrose Broth (SDB) and ultra-sonicated for 30 min at 37 kHz to obtain an even and homogenous solution. The stock was later diluted with SDB to get the various working concentrations.

2.3. Exposure of Yeast to ZnO NPs

The stock culture of S. cerevisiae (ATCC 9763) was obtained from the Faculty of Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, and then sub cultured to the mid-log phase in SDB broth. The yeast suspension with OD of 0.1 at 600 nm during its mid-log phase at 5 h of sub-culture was exposed to different concentrations of ZnO NPs (5, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 150 μg/mL) and incubated for 24 h at room temperature. The yeast culture added with amphotericin B (50 µg/mL) acted as the positive control, while the yeast culture without ZnO NPs was the negative control.

2.4. Growth Inhibition Test

The turbidity method was used to ascertain the fungi-static reaction of ZnO NPs. The turbidity of yeast suspensions exposed with the six concentrations of ZnO NPs and the two controls were measured after incubation at room temperature (25 °C) for 24 h using a visibleectrophotometer (Libra S4, Dichromium, Biochrom, Cambridge, UK) at 600 nm. The optical density of each concentration of ZnO NPs suspension was deducted from the test reading to exclude interference from NPs. Meanwhile, SDB was taken as blank for each measurement. The final absorbance values were taken to analyze the impact of the six concentrations of ZnO NPs on the growth of the yeast. The percentage of inhibition of S. cerevisiae after ZnO NPs treatment was calculated by using Equation (1).
Percentage   of   growth   inhibition = OD   negative   control   OD   test OD   negative   control × 100 %
* OD = the optical density at 600 nm.

2.5. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy

FTIR analysis was done to observe the involvement of surface functional groups of the yeast cell wall in facilitating the binding of ZnO NPs on the cell surface. A volume of 3 mL yeast cell suspension from treatment with 150 μg/mL of ZnO NPs was taken and centrifuged for 10 min at 6000× g after incubation for 24 h. The pellet was washed with 1× PBS. The process was repeated three times, and the pellet was freeze-dried to eliminate moisture. Then the pellet was subjected to FTIR analysis (Perkin-Elmer, Spectrum RX1, Waltham, MA, USA) at the range of 4000 to 400 cm−1 [21].

2.6. SEM-EDX Analysis

The harvested yeast cells pellet was washed with 1× PBS for 3 times by centrifuging at 6000× g for 10 min. The cells were then fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS overnight. The samples were washed with 1× PBS three times and then with distilled water. Further, the dehydration was done with increasing concentrations of ethanol, at 50%, 75%, and 95%, and the final step of the dehydration process was repeated three times with 100% absolute alcohol, followed by critical point drying and sputter coating. The pre-treated cells were then examined with scanning electron microscopy (JEOL JSM 6710F, Tokyo, Japan) [21].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All the tests were conducted in triplicates, and the data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. The data were processed by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, IBMM SPSS) to analyze the variance triggered by ZnO NPs towards the yeast.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of ZnO NPs

The SEM analysis was used to view the surface morphology and average particle size of ZnO NPs. The SEM image showed sphere-shaped NPs with rods, as shown in Figure 1A. The average size of the particles was measured to be 49.85 nm, with a range of 31.4 to 66.3 nm. The EDX analysis verified the element composition of ZnO NPs. Based on the peaks shown in Figure 1B, the zinc and oxygen molecules were confirmed to be present in the ZnO nanopowder studied.
The XRD spectrum shown in Figure 2 revealed that the ZnO NPs are in a hexagonal wurtzite crystalline structure according to ICDD-PDF-4-2018-01-070-8070 [26]. The average crystalline size of ZnO NPs was calculated to be 37.29 nm by Debye Scherrer’s formula. Further, the FTIR spectrum displayed in Figure 3 illustrates the peaks at 3425, 1628, and 524 cm−1. The peak near 3400 and 3600 cm−1 is ascribed to O-H vibration on the surface of ZnO nanoparticles, the peak near 1634 cm−1 corresponds to Zn-O stretching, and the peak at 400–800 cm−1 represents stretching of ZnO nanoparticles [27,28].

3.2. Growth Inhibition Test

The exposure of yeast cells to the different concentrations of ZnO NPs was performed to report the antifungal effect of ZnO NPs on S. cerevisiae. The present study results showed that the treatment of ZnO NPs on S. cerevisiae resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) growth reduction at 24 h with the reported values of 7.04 ± 0.64, 18.85 ± 1.92, 33.38 ± 1.35, 40.38 ± 1.81, 61.13 ± 4.89, and 70.30 ± 3.19% for 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 150 μg/mL ZnO NPs, respectively (Figure 4). A growth reduction of 88.65 ± 1.49% was reported in positive control treated with amphotericin B (50 µg/mL).
The gradual decrease in the growth of yeast cells was observed as the concentration of nanoparticles increased, as shown in Figure 4, indicating a dose-dependent growth inhibition of S. cerevisiae. A study from Nasrollahi et al. [29], which studied the antifungal activity of silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) on Candida albicans and S. cerevisiae, reported 50% fungal inhibition when treated with 0.5 and 4 mg/mL of Ag NPs, respectively, at 35 °C for 24 h. Moreover, Khan et al. [30] reported that the maximum zone of inhibition of C. albicans when exposed to 0.5 mg/mL of ZnO NPs for 48 h at 37 °C was 20 mm through the disc-diffusion method. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) of ZnO NPs on C. albicans at 35 °C for 48 h were 128 and 256 μg/mL respectively [31]. The MIC of ZnO NPs against Alternaria alternata, Aspergiluus niger, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum, and Peniciilium expansum at 28 °C for 72 h was 64, 16, 128, 64, and 128 μg/mL, respectively [32]. Likewise, in this present study, the ZnO NPs showed dose-dependent growth inhibition of S. cerevisiae, as the concentration of ZnO NPs increased from 5 to 150 μg/mL, the growth of inhibition rate also increased from 7.04 ± 0.64 to 70.30 ± 3.19%.

3.3. Surface Interaction of ZnO NPs on the Yeast Cell Wall

FTIR analysis was used to inspect the related functional groups involved in the interaction of ZnO NPs onto the surface of S. cerevisiae, as shown in Table 1. The FTIR spectrum of ZnO NPs treated S. cerevisiae (Figure 5) illustrated the likely involvement of hydroxyl group (3422 cm−1), alkene (2928, 2374, and 2345 cm−1), amide I (1648 cm−1), carbonyl, and alkene (1402 cm−1) and phosphate groups (1051 cm−1) of the yeast cell wall in the binding of ZnO NPs to yeast surface, respectively.
The area between 3435 and 3422 cm−1 was mainly assigned to O-H and N-H groups stretching of proteins, polysaccharides, particularly chitin [33,34]. According to studies from Kiwi and Nadtochenko [35] and Fang et al. [36], the permeability of the lipids on the cell wall could be affected when the nanoparticles attached to the –CH groups on the cell membrane, which will be shown in the peak range from 3100 to 2800 cm−1. This peak region is also important to indicate the adverse effect of the nanoparticles on the cell wall [37,38]. Hence, the newly formed peaks in the ZnO NPs treated samples at 2928 cm−1 may possibly be associated with the involvement of C-H groups of lipids in binding of NPs, the lipid might be ergosterol. There were also other two peaks, 2374 and 2345 cm−1 resulting from the asymmetric C–H stretching of hydrocarbon [39].
According to studies by Burgula et al. [40] and Eckhardt et al. [41], when the ions are discharged from the nanoparticles, they will start to target the organic compounds such as amino acids, and this will lead to an alteration in the conformation of the protein. This alteration happened when the peak shifted from 1639 to 1648 cm−1, which resulted from the stretching vibration of C=O groups by intramolecular native β-pleated sheet structures [42]. The increase in absorptions of β-pleated was possibly due to the denaturation of the secondary structure to its primary conformation [34]. Naumann [33] suggested that the region of protein amide I bands frequently overlaps with nucleic acid, and any changes in hydrogen bonds in the secondary structure will affect the vibration in amide I region, which is important to determine the secondary conformation of protein [43]. The peaks observed in the region 1398 and 1402 cm−1 were contributed by C=O stretching uniformly of COO- in polypeptides [44]. On top of that, the peak number shown within this region may be dominated by the alkene vibration of the trimethylamine group in phosphatidylcholine [45]. Besides, Casal and Mantsch [46] reported that the wagging vibrations in lipids and β(1–3) glucans would lead to the shifting of peak within this region.
The peaks at 1081 and 1051 cm−1 are typically corresponded to polysaccharides, specifically glucans and mannans, which are mostly found on the cell wall of the yeast [47]. This was possibly due to the absorption of carbohydrates and insignificant contribution from phosphate groups in phospholipids covered in the spectral area between 1200 cm−1 and 900 cm−1 [47]. In addition, Jiang et al. [48] reported that when bacteria are treated with metal oxide nanoparticles, the C-O bond in carbohydrates will be weakened due to the increment in the absorption energy as a result of the bonding formation between hydrogen with oxides and the subsequent radicals generated during the oxidation will change the configuration of polysaccharides [41], which, in turn, may compromise the membrane integrity and lead to cell death. Overall, the FTIR spectrum of S. cerevisiae treated with ZnO NPs demonstrated the possible involvement of different functional groups, such as hydroxyl, amides, alkene, and phosphate from phospholipids, polypeptides, polysaccharides, and ergosterol, in binding of ZnO NPs on the cell surface which might have brought the loss of membrane integrity and death of yeast cells.

3.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy

The SEM was used to visualize the morphological changes in S. cerevisiae after exposure to ZnO NPs for 24 h. In the yeast suspensions without any treatment, as shown in Figure 6A, the yeast cells appeared in ovoid shape with slight elongation and intact cell membrane. The treatment of ZnO NPs on yeast cells caused several morphological alterations on the cell surface. Based on Figure 6B, the yeast cell treated with 100 μg/mL of ZnO NPs after 24 h showed rupture of the cell membrane. Besides, there were several invaginations and pitting observed on the cell surface (Figure 6C). Similar results were found in a study by Kieliszek et al. [49] where C. albicans showed shrinkage and fragmented vacuoles in the cells when they were exposed to 20 mg/L of selenium nanoparticles at 24 h.
In the present study, when the concentration of ZnO NPs increased to 150 μg/mL of ZnO NPs, the yeast cell showed wrinkles, as seen in Figure 6D, and deformity on the cells, as shown in Figure 6E at 24 h. Similarly, S. cerevisiae was reported to show wrinkles when it was subjected to environmental stress [50]. Further, a study by Radhakrishnan et al. [51] evidenced that the C. albicans treated with 40 μg/mL of Ag NPs demonstrated wrinkle, bumpy and irregular external cell membrane, and these were believed to be responsible for the destruction of the external cell structure and plasma membrane. Besides, our earlier studies on bacteria S. pyogenes and P. aeruginosa reported similar morphological damages when treated with ZnO NPs at 24 h, as demonstrated in the present study [52,53]. For the cytotoxicity effects of ZnO NPs on fungi, researchers have proposed several possible mechanisms, as shown in Figure 7. These mechanisms included the accumulation of ROS on the surface of fungi [54,55], release of Zn2+ ions [56,57], interaction and accumulation of ZnO NPs on the cell surface of fungi [58], distortion and interference of physiological processes which render the normal function of the cell membrane [57,59] and the morphological changes of the cell, which can lead to cell death [59,60].

4. Conclusions

The present study demonstrated the dose-dependent growth inhibitory activity of ZnO NPs on S. cerevisiae. The treatment ZnO NPs caused significant growth inhibition of S. cerevisiae from 5 μg/mL of ZnO NPs at 24 h. In addition, the treatment of ZnO NPs resulted in the deformity and rupture of cell membrane, which could have possibly led to cell death. Further, the hydroxyl group, alkene, amides, carbonyl, and phosphate groups from the phospholipids, polysaccharides, polypeptides, and ergosterol of the yeast cell wall were identified to be responsible for binding of ZnO NPs on the cell surface. The present investigation might be helpful to explore the application of ZnO NPs as an effective antifungal agent in treating infections caused by S. cerevisiae.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.D., L.S.W., A.C.T.A. and M.A.; Methodology, S.D., L.S.W., A.C.T.A. and M.A.; Investigation, E.P.T. and S.D.; Resources, S.D. and L.S.W.; Visualization, A.K.J.; Writing—original draft preparation, E.P.T., S.D., R.R. and L.S.W.; Writing—review and editing, S.K.S., M.A., V.S., M.S. and S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work was funded by Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman Research Fund (IPSR/RMC/UTARRF/2020-C2/S06) and Ministry of Education, Malaysia (Grant No. FRGS-1-2014-SG03-INTI-02-1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study will be provided on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. Zhang, H.; Zhu, A. Emerging invasive fungal infections: Clinical features and controversies in diagnosis and treatment processes. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 607–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Chang, Y.-L.; Yu, S.-J.; Heitman, J.; Wellington, M.; Chen, Y.-L. New facets of antifungal therapy. Virulence 2016, 8, 222–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Souza, A.C.; Amaral, A.C. Antifungal Therapy for Systemic Mycosis and the Nanobiotechnology Era: Improving Efficacy, Biodistribution and Toxicity. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Sousa, F.; Ferreira, D.; Reis, S.; Costa, P. Current insights on antifungal therapy: Novel nanotechnology approaches for drug delivery systems and new drugs from natural sources. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Djearamane, S.; Wong, L.S.; Lim, Y.M.; Lee, P.F. Oxidative stress effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on fresh water microalga Haematococcus pluvialis. Ecol. Environ. Conserv. 2020, 26, 2020–2663. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang, Z.; Wang, H.; Chen, Z.; Wang, X.; Choo, J.; Chen, L. Plasmonic colorimetric sensors based on etching and growth of noble metal nanoparticles: Strategies and applications. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018, 114, 52–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Soto-Robles, C.A.; Luque, P.A.; Gómez-Gutiérrez, C.M.; Nava, O. Vilchis-Nestor, A.R.; Lugo-Medina, E. Ranjithkumar. R. Castro-Beltrán, A. Study on the effect of the concentration of Hibiscus sabdariffa extract on the green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles. Results Phys. 2019, 15, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Djearamane, S.; Wong, L.S.; Lim, Y.M.; Lee, P.F. Cytotoxic Effects of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles on Chlorella vulgaris. Pollut. Res. 2019, 38, 479–484. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ranjithkumar, R.; Selvam, K.; Shanmugavadivu, M. Antimicrobial coated textile via biogenic synthesis silver nanoparticles. J. Green Sci. Technol. 2013, 1, 111–113. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rauf, M.A.; Oves, M.; Rehman, F.U.; Khan, A.R.; Husain, N. Bougainvillea flower extract mediated zinc oxide’s nanomaterials for antimicrobial and anticancer activity. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 116, 108983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Jilani, A.; Othman, M.H.D.; Ansari, M.O.; Oves, M.; Hussain, S.Z.; Khan, I.U.; Abdel-wahab, M.S. Structural and optical characteristics, and bacterial decolonization studies on non-reactive RF sputtered Cu–ZnO@ graphene-based nanoparticles thin films. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 6515–6529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Djearamane, S.; Ravintharan, T.; Liang, S.X.T.; Wong, L.S. Sensitivity of Proteus vulgaris to Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles. Sains Malays. 2022, 51, 1353–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bharathi, D.; Ranjithkumar, R.; Chandar Shekar, B.; Bhuvaneshwari, V. Preparation of chitosan coated zinc oxide nanocomposites for enhanced antibacterial and photocatalytic activity: As a bionanocomposite. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 129, 989–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jin, S.-E.; Jin, H.-E. Antimicrobial Activity of Zinc Oxide Nano/Microparticles and Their Combinations against Pathogenic Microorganisms for Biomedical Applications: From Physicochemical Characteristics to Pharmacological Aspects. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Munir, M.U.; Ahmed, A.; Usman, M.; Salman, S. Recent advances in nanotechnology-aided materials in combating microbial resistance and functioning as antibiotics substitutes. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 7329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dizaj, S.M.; Lotfipour, F.; Barzegar-Jalali, M.; Zarrintan, M.H.; Adibkia, K. Antimicrobial activity of the metals and metal oxide nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014, 44, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Theuretzbacher, U.; Outterson, K.; Engel, A.; Karlén, A. The global preclinical antibacterial pipeline. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2019, 18, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Li, W.; Separovic, F.; O’Brien-Simpson, N.M.; Wade, J.D. Chemically modified and conjugated antimicrobial peptides against superbugs. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 4932–4973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Djearamane, S.; Lim, Y.M.; Wong, L.S.; Lee, P.F. Cellular accumulation and cytotoxic effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles in microalga Haematococcus pluvialis. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Maheswaran, H.; Wong, L.S.; Dhanapal, A.C.T.A.; Narendhirakannan, R.T.; Janakiraman, A.K.; Djearamane, S. Toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles on human skin dermal cells. J. Exp. Biol. Agric. Sci. 2021, 9, S95–S100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Djearamane, S.; Loh, Z.C.; Lee, J.J.; Wong, L.S.; Rajamani, R.; Luque, P.A.; Gupta, P.K.; Liang, S.X.T. Remedial Aspect of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Against Serratia marcescens and Enterococcus faecalis. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. He, L.; Liu, Y.; Mustapha, A.; Lin, M. Antifungal activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles against Botrytis cinerea and Penicillium expansum. Microbiol. Res. 2011, 166, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sirelkhatim, A.; Mahmud, S.; Seeni, A.; Kaus, N.H.M.; Ann, L.C.; Bakhori, S.K.M.; Mohamad, D. Review on Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: Antibacterial Activity and Toxicity Mechanism. Nano-Micro Lett. 2015, 7, 219–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Munoz, P.; Bouza, E.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Eiros, J.M.; Pérez, M.J.; Sánchez-Somolinos, M.; Peláez, T. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fungemia: An Emerging Infectious Disease Source: Clinical Infectious Diseases. Oxf. J. 2005, 40, 1625–1634. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bojsen, R.; Regenberg, B.; Folkesson, A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae biofilm tolerance towards systemic antifungals depends on growth phase. BMC Microbiol. 2014, 14, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Michlik, T.; Schmid, M.; Rosin, A.; Gerdes, T.; Moos, R. Mechanical coating of zinc particles with Bi2O3-Li2O-ZnO glasses as anode material for rechargeable zinc-based batteries. Batteries 2018, 4, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Ahmad, W.; Kalra, D. Green synthesis, characterization and anti-microbial activities of ZnO nanoparticles using Euphorbia hirta leaf extract. J. King Saud Univ.-Sci. 2020, 32, 2358–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Saini, M.; Yadav, S.; Rani, N.; Mushtaq, A.; Rawat, S.; Saini, K. Antibacterial study of nanosized zinc oxide (F1) against various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 67, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nasrollahi, A.; Pourshamsian, K.H.; Mansourkiaee, P. Antifungal activity of silver nanoparticles on some of fungi. Int. J. Nano Dim. 2011, 1, 233–239. [Google Scholar]
  30. Khan, M.F.; Ansari, A.H.; Hameedullah, M.; Ahmad, E.; Husain, F.M.; Zia, Q.; Aliev, G. Flower-shaped ZnO nanoparticles synthesized by a novel approach at near-room temperatures with antibacterial and antifungal properties. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 853–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Miri, A.; Mahdinejad, N.; Ebrahimy, O.; Khatami, M.; Sarani, M. Zinc oxide nanoparticles: Biosynthesis, characterization, antifungal and cytotoxic activity. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 104, 109981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jamdagni, P.; Khatri, P.; Rana, J.S. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using flower extract of Nyctanthes arbor-tristis and their antifungal activity. J. King Saud Univ.–Sci. 2018, 30, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Naumann, D. FT-Infrared and FT-Raman spectroscopy in biomedical research. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2001, 36, 239–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Burattini, E.; Cavagna, M.; Dell’Anna, R.; Campeggi, F.M.; Monti, F.; Rossi, F.; Torriani, S. A FTIR microspectroscopy study of autolysis in cells of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Vib. Spectrosc. 2008, 47, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kiwi, J.; Nadtochenko, V. Evidence for the mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of the bacterial wall membrane at the TiO2 interface by ATR–FTIR and laser kinetic spectroscopy. Langmuir 2005, 21, 4631–4641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fang, J.; Lyon, D.Y.; Wiesner, M.R.; Dong, J.; Alvarez, P.J. Effect of a fullerene water suspension on bacterial phospholipids and membrane phase behaviour. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 2636–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sivakesava, S.; Irudayaraj, J.; Debroy, C. Differentiation of microorganisms by FTIR-AIR and NIR spectroscopy. Trans. ASAE 2004, 47, 951–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mura, S.; Greppi, G.; Marongiu, M.L.; Roggero, P.P.; Ravindranath, S.P.; Mauer, L.J.; Irudayaraj, J. FTIR nanobiosensors for Escherichia coli detection. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2012, 3, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Sivakumar, P.; Nethradevi, C.; Renganathan, S. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Lantana Camara fruit extract and its effect on pathogens. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2012, 5, 97–101. [Google Scholar]
  40. Burgula, Y.; Khali, D.; Kim, S.; Krishnan, S.S.; Cousin, M.A.; Gore, J.P.; Mauer, L.J. Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella typhimurium using filtration followed by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. J. Food Prot. 2006, 69, 1777–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Eckhardt, S.; Brunetto, P.S.; Gagnon, J.; Priebe, M.; Giese, B.; Fromm, K.M. Nanobio Silver: Its Interactions with Peptides and Bacteria, and Its Uses in Medicine. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 4708–4754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Correa-Garcia, S.; Bermudez-Moretti, M.; Travo, A.; Dekeris, G.; Fortar, I. FTIR spectroscopic metabolome analysis of lyophilized and fresh Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Anal. Methods 2014, 6, 1855–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gorgulu, S.T.; Dogan, M.; Severcan, F. The characterization and differentiation of higher plants by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Appl. Spectrosc. 2007, 61, 300–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lasch, P.; Boese, M.; Pacifico, A.; Diem, M. FT-IR spectroscopic investigations of single cells on the subcellular level. Vib. Spectrosc. 2002, 28, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cieślik-Boczula, K.; Czarnik-Matusewicz, B.; Perevozkina, M.; Rospenk, M. MCR-ALS as an effective tool for monitoring subsequent phase transitions in pure and doped DPPC liposomes. R. Soc. Chem. Adv. 2015, 5, 40455–40464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Casal, H.L.; Mantsch, H.H. Polymorphic phase behaviour of phospholipid membranes studied by infrared spectroscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1984, 779, 381–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Plata, M.R.; Koch, C.; Wechselberger, P.; Herwig, C.; Lendl, B. Determination of carbohydrates present in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using mid-infrared spectroscopy and partial least squares regression. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405, 8241–8250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Jiang, W.; Yang, K.; Vachet, R.W.; Xing, B. Interaction between oxide nanoparticles and biomolecules of the bacterial cell envelope as examined by infrared spectroscopy. Langmuir 2010, 26, 18071–18077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kieliszek, M.; Błażejak, S.; Bzducha-Wróbel, A.; Kurcz, A. Effects of Selenium on Morphological Changes in Candida utilis ATCC 9950 Yeast Cells. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2015, 169, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Dong, Y.; Yang, Q.; Jia, S.; Qiao, C. Effects of high pressure on the accumulation of trehalose and glutathione in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Biochem. Eng. J. 2007, 37, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Radhakrishnan, V.S. Silver nanoparticles induced alterations in multiple cellular targets, which are critical for drug susceptibilities and pathogenicity in fungal pathogen (Candida albicans). Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 2647–2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Liang, S.X.T.; Wong, L.S.; Lim, Y.M.; Lee, P.F.; Djearamane, S. Effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on Streptococcus pyogenes. South Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 34, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dhanasegaran, K.; Djearamane, S.; Liang, S.X.T.; Wong, L.S.; Kasivelu, G.; Lee, P.F.; Lim, Y.M. Antibacterial properties of zinc oxide nanoparticles on Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853). Sci. Iran. 2022, 28, 3806–3815. [Google Scholar]
  54. Eskandari, M.; Haghighi, N.; Ahmadi, V.; Haghighi, F.; Mohammadi, S.R. Growth and investigation of antifungal properties of ZnO nanorod arrays on the glass. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2011, 406, 112–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sharma, R.K.; Ghose, R. Synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles by homogeneous precipitation method and its application in antifungal activity against Candida albicans. Ceram. Int. 2014, 41, 967–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kasemets, K.; Ivask, A.; Dubourguier, H.C.; Kahru, A. Toxicity of nanoparticles of ZnO, CuO and TiO2 to yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Toxicol. In Vitro 2009, 23, 1116–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Galván Márquez, I.; Ghiyasvand, M.; Massarsky, A.; Babu, M.; Samanfar, B.; Omidi, K.; Golshani, A. Zinc oxide and silver nanoparticles toxicity in the baker’s yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0193111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Abdul, A.T.; Ali, A.F. Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on candida albicans of human saliva (in vitro study). Int. J. Res. Dev. Pharm. Life Sci. 2015, 4, 1892–1900. [Google Scholar]
  59. Xia, T.; Kovochich, M.; Liong, M.; Madler, L.; Gilbert, B.; Shi, H.; Nel, A.E. Comparison of the mechanism of toxicity of zinc oxide and cerium oxide nanoparticles based on dissolution and oxidative stress properties. ACS Nano 2008, 2, 2121–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Zhang, H.; Chen, G. Potent antibacterial activities of Ag/TiO2 nanocomposite powders synthesized by aone-potsol–gel method. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 2905–2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Surface morphology and elemental composition of ZnO NPs; SEM (A) and EDX spectrum (B).
Figure 1. Surface morphology and elemental composition of ZnO NPs; SEM (A) and EDX spectrum (B).
Coatings 12 01988 g001
Figure 2. XRD analysis of ZnO NPs.
Figure 2. XRD analysis of ZnO NPs.
Coatings 12 01988 g002
Figure 3. FTIR Spectrum of ZnO NPs.
Figure 3. FTIR Spectrum of ZnO NPs.
Coatings 12 01988 g003
Figure 4. The percentage of growth inhibition on S. cerevisiae after treatment with six distinct concentrations of ZnO NPs for 24 h at 25 °C in SDB. The values plotted in the graph are in mean ± standard deviation. * Demonstrates the significant difference between control and yeast suspension treated with ZnO NPs at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. The percentage of growth inhibition on S. cerevisiae after treatment with six distinct concentrations of ZnO NPs for 24 h at 25 °C in SDB. The values plotted in the graph are in mean ± standard deviation. * Demonstrates the significant difference between control and yeast suspension treated with ZnO NPs at p < 0.05.
Coatings 12 01988 g004
Figure 5. FTIR spectrum of S. cerevisiae treated with 150 μg/mL ZnO NPs. Black line denotes the negative control, while blue line denotes the sample treated with 150 μg/mL ZnO NPs.
Figure 5. FTIR spectrum of S. cerevisiae treated with 150 μg/mL ZnO NPs. Black line denotes the negative control, while blue line denotes the sample treated with 150 μg/mL ZnO NPs.
Coatings 12 01988 g005
Figure 6. SEM images of S. cerevisiae without ZnO NPs treatment (negative control) (A), treated with 100 μg/ mL of ZnO NPs showing rupture of cell membrane (B) and regional invagination and pitting of yeast cell surface (C), treated with 150 μg/ mL of ZnO NPs showing cell wrinkle (D), and cracks and deformity on the cells (E) at 24 h.
Figure 6. SEM images of S. cerevisiae without ZnO NPs treatment (negative control) (A), treated with 100 μg/ mL of ZnO NPs showing rupture of cell membrane (B) and regional invagination and pitting of yeast cell surface (C), treated with 150 μg/ mL of ZnO NPs showing cell wrinkle (D), and cracks and deformity on the cells (E) at 24 h.
Coatings 12 01988 g006
Figure 7. The possible antifungal mechanisms of NPs, including the generation of ROS, rupture of the cell membrane, DNA damage, and enzyme inhibition.
Figure 7. The possible antifungal mechanisms of NPs, including the generation of ROS, rupture of the cell membrane, DNA damage, and enzyme inhibition.
Coatings 12 01988 g007
Table 1. Possible involvement of functional groups in the surface binding of ZnO NPs on the yeast cell surface.
Table 1. Possible involvement of functional groups in the surface binding of ZnO NPs on the yeast cell surface.
Absorption (cm−1)Molecular MotionFunctional GroupBiomolecules
3435 → 3422O-H with N-H stretching modesAlcohol, secondary amideProteins, Polysaccharides, Chitin
2928C-H groupsErgosterolLipids
2374, 2345CH2 vibrationAlkene groupHydrocarbon
1639 → 1648C=O stretching,
N-H bending
Amide IPolypeptides
1398 → 1402C=O of COO symmetric stretching vibrations in proteins, CH2 wagging vibrations in lipids, and β (1–3) glucansCarbonyl group, Alkene groupLipids, Proteins, Polysaccharides
1081 → 1051C-O mainly by vibrations and absorptions of polysaccharides and phosphate groupsPolysaccharides, phosphate groupPolysaccharides, mainly glucans and mannans &
Phospholipids
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tan, E.P.; Djearamane, S.; Wong, L.S.; Rajamani, R.; Tanislaus Antony, A.C.; Subbaih, S.K.; Janakiraman, A.K.; Aminuzzaman, M.; Subramaniyan, V.; Sekar, M.; et al. An In Vitro Study of the Antifungal Efficacy of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles against Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Coatings 2022, 12, 1988. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12121988

AMA Style

Tan EP, Djearamane S, Wong LS, Rajamani R, Tanislaus Antony AC, Subbaih SK, Janakiraman AK, Aminuzzaman M, Subramaniyan V, Sekar M, et al. An In Vitro Study of the Antifungal Efficacy of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles against Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Coatings. 2022; 12(12):1988. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12121988

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tan, Eng Pei, Sinouvassane Djearamane, Ling Shing Wong, Ranjithkumar Rajamani, Anto Cordelia Tanislaus Antony, Suresh Kumar Subbaih, Ashok Kumar Janakiraman, Mohammod Aminuzzaman, Vetriselvan Subramaniyan, Mahendran Sekar, and et al. 2022. "An In Vitro Study of the Antifungal Efficacy of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles against Saccharomyces cerevisiae" Coatings 12, no. 12: 1988. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12121988

APA Style

Tan, E. P., Djearamane, S., Wong, L. S., Rajamani, R., Tanislaus Antony, A. C., Subbaih, S. K., Janakiraman, A. K., Aminuzzaman, M., Subramaniyan, V., Sekar, M., & Selvaraj, S. (2022). An In Vitro Study of the Antifungal Efficacy of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles against Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Coatings, 12(12), 1988. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12121988

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop