Next Article in Journal
Top-Down Formulation of Goethite Nanosuspensions for the Production of Transparent, Inorganic Glass Coatings
Previous Article in Journal
Study on Antifatigue Crack Growth Characteristics of Ball-End Milling Bionic Surface
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Epitaxial Growth of SiC Films on 4H-SiC Substrate by High-Frequency Induction-Heated Halide Chemical Vapor Deposition

1
State Key Lab of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Chaozhou Branch of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Guangdong Laboratory, Chaozhou 521000, China
3
Wuhan University of Technology Advanced Engineering Technology Research Institute of Zhongshan City, Zhongshan 528400, China
4
Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences Siberian Branch, 3 Acad. Lavrerntiev Pr., 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2022, 12(3), 329; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12030329
Submission received: 18 January 2022 / Revised: 11 February 2022 / Accepted: 15 February 2022 / Published: 2 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Thin Films)

Abstract

:
SiC epitaxial wafers offer enormous potential for a wide range of telecom technologies due to their excellent properties. The experimental process was simulated by software, and the contour of gas flow velocity and raw material mass fraction inside the chamber were obtained. SiC films were epitaxially grown on 4H-SiC single crystalline substrates at different temperatures for one batch, using SiCl4, CH4, and H2 as precursors. With increasing temperature, the crystal phase changed from 4H-SiC at 1773 K to a mixture of 4H- and 3C-SiC, and then a mixture of 3C-SiC and graphite at higher than 1923 K. The film was mainly (004)-oriented 4H-SiC and (111)-oriented 3C-SiC.

1. Introduction

Silicon carbide has the advantages of high heat resistance, high thermal conductivity, high critical breakdown voltage, and wide band gap [1,2] that make it suitable for electronic devices applied at high temperatures, high pressure, high frequencies, anti-irradiation, and other fields [3,4]. For example, the microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) and metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFET) under extreme conditions are mainly made of SiC films [5,6]. Recently, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), as a widely used material processing technology, has become a suitable method for thin film preparation. Thin films are formed on a heated substrate via a chemical reaction of gas-phase precursors, resulting in tunable and conformal products [7]. The mainstream method to prepare SiC thin films is CVD using methane and silane as raw material with low deposition rates of 10 μm/h [8,9] because Si droplets are easy to form at high temperatures. Due to the thickness of SiC film for high-power devices applied to 10 kV being at least 100 μm, it takes dozens of hours to prepare SiC film using traditional raw materials. On the other hand, in chlorine-containing raw materials, such as SiCl4 and CH3-SiCl3, Cl atoms can combine with Si atoms to form a family of stable compounds at high temperatures, thereby inhibiting the formation of silicon droplets [10,11]. Furthermore, high-frequency induction coils are used to create a high-temperature environment in the CVD process for preparing a large number of films within one batch [12]. In this study, several specimens were prepared simultaneously at different temperatures in one batch by placing several substrates at different positions, i.e., a kind of high-throughput preparation. Preliminary simulations of the environment at different positions of the chamber were carried out, which was helpful for further analysis of the experimental principle [13]. The SiC thin films were fabricated on the 4H-SiC single crystal substrate via halide CVD with the SiCl4/CH4/H2 system [14]. The effects of deposition temperature, molar ratio of C to Si on the deposition rate, microstructure, and preferred orientation of the films have been investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

The modeling and meshing of the device were completed by Gambit software. The inlet and outlet boundary conditions were set to velocity-inlet and pressure-outlet, respectively. Fluent and Tecplot software was applied to simulate and analyze the chamber’s internal environment [15]. A hot-wall-type horizontal CVD apparatus was applied to synthesize SiC films. Figure 1 illustrates a schematic diagram of the CVD apparatus. The reaction chamber was nested with a cylindrical quartz tube to form a vacuum atmosphere, an alumina cylindrical block as a heat insulator, and a graphite tube (L = 400 mm, Φout = 50 mm, Φint = 40 mm) to heat the reaction zone and substrate by high-frequency induction coils outside the quartz tube. The high-frequency coil was powered by an induction heating power supply (CYP-50), the frequency of which was 30–50 kHz. Entering the chamber, the reaction raw materials (CH4 and SiCl4) absorbed energy to decompose and generate intermediate reactants (HCl, SiCl, Cl, etc.). Then, part of the reactant molecules and intermediate reactants gradually diffused and adsorbed on the surface of the substrate, which chemically reacted on the surface of the substrate and formed a thin film. Finally, unreacted species and by-product molecules diffused outward and were recovered.
The repeatability limitation of CVD technology often comes from the need for a high vacuum. The substrate should be placed in the chamber immediately after cleaning to avoid contact with the fibers. The gas flow rate should be slowly increased by a gradient to avoid changes in the substrate position. Contamination of the chamber caused by residual precursors often greatly affects the vacuum level. So, the use of replaceable quartz tubes and frequent cleaning of sealing items such as valves and rubber rings are recommended for films synthesis. In addition, a cold trap device was connected to the chamber outlet for processing by-products to keep the chamber clean.
SiCl4 (99.5% purity; Aladdin, Shanghai, China) and CH4 (99.999% purity; Xiangyun Industry, Wuhan, China) were used as silicon and carbon sources, respectively. The SiCl4 was heated to 353 K by an evaporation device and mixed with H2 and CH4. The flow rates of the precursors were regulated by flow controllers (MFC; Sevenstar, Beijing, China). The mixed gas was transported into the vacuum chamber through a graphite tube (L = 270 mm, Φout = 15 mm, and Φint = 10 mm). The flow rate of the H2 and SiCl4 was set at 4000 and 66 sccm, respectively. The flow rate of the CH4 was set at 53, 66, and 86 sccm, which made RC/Si = 0.7, 1.0, and 1.3, respectively. The silicon carbide was deposited on the 4H-SiC single crystalline substrates (4.0° toward <11–20>; Tianyue Industry, Shandong, China) for 5 min with the pressure being stably controlled at 5 kPa. Ultimately, the by-product was treated via a purification device filled with activated carbon and sodium hydroxide spray scrubber.
Iftekhar Chowdhury et al. prepared 4H-SiC by hot-wall CVD on SiC substrates with a growth rate of 15 μm/h at 1823 K, and evidence of the significant formation of silicon droplets and comet-like inclusions was observed [16]. After the silicon source gas was replaced from silane with dichlorosilane, the deposition rate reached 50–75 μm/h at 1923 K. L. Yang et al. prepared 4H-SiC on 4H-SiC substrates. As the temperature increased from 1823 to 1923 K, the conversion rate of basal plane dislocations (BPDs) to threading edge dislocations (TEDs) decreased, leading to the suppression of lateral growth. Accordingly, the experimental temperature range was designed from 1773 K to 1973 K [17]. The temperature distribution measured by thermocouple from inlet to outlet is shown in Figure 2. At the center of the graphite tube, the temperature reached the highest level, but was about 23 K lower than the preset ones. The deposition temperature (Tdep) in the graphite tube decreased gradually from the center to the two ends. Based on the temperature distribution, five substrates were placed in the graphite tube from the center to the outlet at every interval of 50 K in order to obtain multiple samples at different conditions simultaneously, i.e., a kind of high-throughput synthesis. Specifically, the temperature was controlled under the preset temperature of 1973 K, and the substrates were placed at the position of A, B, C, D, E in Figure 2, respectively, so that the temperature difference between adjacent substrates was 50 K. In addition, the substrates were placed at Tdep = 1750 K, at the positions of E, F, and G under the preset temperatures of 1973, 1873, and 1773 K, respectively, to research the effect of position. Figure 3 shows the contour of the gases’ velocity inside the graphite tube simulated by Gambit software. The gas velocity reaches the maximum at the center of the cylindrical tube and gradually decreases toward the tube wall. The gas experiences turbulent flow at the cylindric center, but stable static flow at the half of the radial direction. In addition, the gas velocity at the outlet area is more complex than that at the inlet area. Therefore, the substrates for deposition were placed on a graphite plate at the half of the radial direction to keep a steady gas flow, which is beneficial to the epitaxial growth of thin films [18]. Figure 4 reveals the contours of the mass fraction of gaseous raw materials (CH4, SiCl4 and H2) in the chamber. It can be seen from Figure 4b that the hydrogen was evenly distributed in the chamber during the experiment. In Figure 4a, in the central area of the chamber, the distribution of gas materials was relatively uniform. As the distance gradually approached the outlet area, the distribution of gas raw materials became gradually uneven, and the phenomenon of gas accumulation occurred.
The crystalline phases and preferred orientation were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (θ–2θ) with Cu-Kα radiation (XRD, 40 kV, 40 mA and 4°/min, Ultima III; Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). The surface and fracture morphologies of the thin films were observed using a 20 kV field-emission scanning electron microscope (Quanta-250, FEI, Houston, TX, USA). The deposition rate (Rdep) was calculated from the thickness of the thin films and experimental time. A Raman spectrometer (LabRAM HR Evolution; Horiba, Paris, France) was used for Raman spectra measurements excited by a 532 nm wavelength diode laser.

3. Results and Discussion

The detection depth of Raman spectra is much lower than that of XRD, which is better to omit the influence of 4H-SiC substrate. Figure 5 shows the Raman spectra of the thin films prepared at 1750 to 1950 K under the preset temperature of 1973 K. According to the standard spectra of SiC, the E2(TO) of 4H-SiC is the characteristic peak to distinguish 3C-SiC; furthermore, the relative strength of the A1 (LO) band of 4H-SiC is lower than that of the LO band of 3C-SiC [19,20]. At 1750 and 1800 K, only 4H-SiC was formed, while 3C- and 4H-SiC mixtures were formed at 1850 K. Graphite was identified at levels higher than 1900 K. The anomalous behavior at 100–200 cm−1 was typical of the Raman spectrum of amorphous SiC, indicating mixed features of amorphous/distorted and crystalline silicon carbide [21,22]. According to the Raman spectra, the crystalline phases of the thin films prepared at different temperatures and RC/Si are summarized in Figure 6. The boundaries of the different crystalline phases regions are determined by the numerical values of the process parameters of the preparation, and the median value is taken as the endpoint. The 4H-SiC, 3C-SiC and C only appeared at Tdep = 1750 K, RC/Si = 1.3.
In SiC crystals, defects may hinder the propagation of phonons [23]. When the Raman scattering laser irradiates the SiC crystal, the photons collide with each other in the lattice, resulting in a shorter phonon lifetime. The more defects, the shorter the lifetime of the phonons, which ultimately makes the FWHM of the LOPC mode gradually become wider in the Raman spectrum [23,24]. Therefore, the FWHM of the Raman peak is possible to reflect the quality of the SiC crystal. Figure 7 reveals the FWHM of the LO peak in the Raman spectra of the SiC film grown at different deposition temperatures and RC/Si. The FWHMs increased slightly with increasing temperature from 1750 to 1800 K, and then decreased to the lowest point at about 10 cm−1 at temperatures higher than 1850 K. In another word, the SiC crystal may have the highest quality at 1850 K.
Figure 8 reveals the XRD patterns of the grown SiC films to reflect their preferred orientation. Due to the 4H-SiC single crystalline substrate with 4.0° tilted toward <110> being applied in this study, no characteristic peak of the substrate was identified. Combined with the results of Raman spectra in Figure 5, the (004)-oriented 4H-SiC was grown at levels lower than 1850 K; non-oriented 3C-SiC was co-deposited with graphite at levels higher than 1900 K. The relative intensity of the C characteristic peak at 26° was much larger than that of the 3C-SiC characteristic peak in Figure 8i,j, and the relative intensity of the 4H-SiC characteristic peak at 35.6° was much larger than that of the 3C-SiC characteristic peak in Figure 8o, so the ordinates were processed, resulting in lots of noise in the XRD. In addition, in Figure 8k, the relative intensity of the characteristic peaks of 4H-SiC was relatively low, and the dispersion peak was more obvious around 27° owing to the amorphous components presented in the film, resulting in a slanted pattern. Since the volume or weight of a substance participating in diffraction is proportional to its diffraction intensity, the relative ratio of each phase can be calculated from the ratio of the peak area when the diffraction intensity of each XRD characteristic peak is not much different.
The orientations of the SiC films were evaluated by the Lotgering factor (Fhkl) by Equation (1).
Fhkl = (PhklP0)/(1 − P0)
Phkl and P0 are the ratios of the peak intensities of the (hkl) planes and the sum of all peaks for the films (Phkl) and powders (P0), respectively. The Fhkl value of 1 indicates that the sample has a completely preferred orientation. The Fhkl of 0 indicates that the samples and the powders have the same diffraction peaks, indicating non-orientation [25].
Figure 9 presents the FWHMs and the F004 of the 4H-SiC (004) at the C/Si ratio of 1.3, The FWHM decreased and then rose slightly with increasing Tdep, showing the lowest value of 0.15 at 1850 K, indicating the highest crystallinity at 1850 K. As the temperature increased, the F004 was close to 1.0 at 1750 to 1850 K and then decreased to 0.52 at 1950 K, indicating the (004)-orientation became weak.
Figure 10 reveals the pole figure of the 4H-SiC substrate with a 4.0° off-angle and the SiC film at 1823 K and RC/Si = 1.3. The deposited thin film was 4H-SiC. The diffraction peaks appear once every 60°, indicating a hexagonal symmetry. Moreover, there is a slight deviation (about 5°) in the azimuth angle of the diffraction pole between the substrate and the deposited film, which corresponds to the off-angle of the substrate.
Figure 11 demonstrates the surface morphologies of the thin films at different temperatures and RC/Si. At 1750 K, the surface microstructure is smooth, and the grain size is about 100 nm; at 1850 K, some hollows are observed, which may be etched by hydrogen; at 1950 K, many grains were formed on the surface. With increasing temperature, the surface roughness increased, and some large grains were observed on the surface.
Figure 12 shows the fracture morphology of the thin films prepared at different temperatures and RC/Si. The dense cross-sectional microstructure is observed at Tdep = 1750 and 1850 K, while some lamella microstructures were observed at 1950 K, e.g., Figure 12c, which is graphite combined with the results of EDS spectra, Raman spectra, and XRD patterns. The deposition rate was calculated by the cross-sectional thickness dividing the deposition time, as shown in Figure 13.
Figure 13 shows the effect of deposition temperature on the deposition rate of the SiC films under different conditions, which is between 30 and 185 μm/h. At RC/Si = 0.7 and 1.0, the deposition rate increased with increasing deposition temperature and then decreased gradually, showing the maximum at around 1873 K, while at RC/Si = 1.3, the deposition rate decreased in the range of 1773 to 1823 K and then had the same tendency. In addition, with the increase in the C/Si ratio from 0.7 to 1.3, the deposition rate gradually decreased. The source gas cannot obtain enough energy to decompose at low Tdep, so the number of active groups is insufficient, resulting in the low Rdep. In addition, the movement speed of gas-phase particles in the chamber is slow, and active atomic clusters cannot quickly diffuse to the surface of the substrate for effective adsorption at low Tdep, so it is difficult to form a crystal nucleus [26,27], resulting in a decrease in the deposition rate. As the deposition temperature increases, the source gas obtains enough energy to generate more active atomic clusters. In addition, the increase in temperature also makes the activity of gas molecules more intense, and the diffusion rate of active atomic clusters increases, indicating that the active atomic groups can quickly diffuse to the surface of the substrate. The migration rate of active atoms on the surface will also increase, which will rapidly gather to the formed crystal nucleus, leading to an increase in the deposition rate. When the temperature rises to a certain level, it can be seen from the Raman spectra that the methane raw material begins to decompose into deposited carbon in large quantities, resulting in a decrease in the deposition rate.
To research the influence of the substrate position on the growth of SiC films, the films were grown at Tdep = 1750 K and RC/Si = 1.3, at the positions of E, F, and G in Figure 2, i.e., 100, 130, and 200 mm under the preset temperature of 1973, 1873 and 1773 K, respectively. Figure 14a demonstrates the Raman spectra of the films prepared at different positions. All the films prepared at the same temperature but different positions were 4H-SiC. Figure 14b shows the XRD patterns of the 4H-SiC films prepared at the same temperature but at different positions. All the films were highly (004)-oriented 4H-SiC, while the FWHM of the (004) peak at 200 and 130 mm is much lower than that at 100 nm, indicating the highest crystallinity. The surface and fracture morphologies of the SiC films reveal that as the position approached the outlet, the surface roughness and the grain size gradually increased, whereas the deposition rate (thickness) decreased. This indicates the precursor of SiCl4 may be consumed from the center to the outlet, forming a precursor’s concentration gradient, which is consistent with FWHM in the XRD patterns. Therefore, the distribution of gaseous materials in the chamber has less influence on the preparation process than temperature. The film is of high quality and high crystallinity in the central area where the gas raw materials are evenly distributed.

4. Conclusions

SiC thin films were epitaxially grown on 4H-SiC substrates by high-frequency heating CVD using a SiCl4-CH4-H2 system. Multi-samples were obtained simultaneously but at different temperatures in one batch, and the experimental design was integrated with the simulation software to efficiently develop new materials, indicating a kind of high-throughput synthesis. The (004)-oriented 4H-SiC films were obtained at lower than 1800 K, 4H- and 3C-SiC mixture film between 1800 to 1900 K, and graphite appeared in the mixture films at higher than 1900 K. The 4H-SiC films prepared at 1850 K had the highest deposition rate of 185 μm/h and the highest quality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.T.; Data curation, C.L.; Investigation, X.Z.; Methodology, K.L., M.L.K., T.G. and S.Z.; Software, Q.X. and Q.L.; Writing—original draft, C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the following funds: (1) the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (grant number 2020B010181001, 2021B0707050001, 2019B121204001), (2) the Chaozhou Science and Technology Project (grant number 2019PT01), (3) the Self-innovation Research Funding Project of Hanjiang Laboratory (grant number HJL202012A001, HJL202012A002, HJL202012A003), (4) the Major Science and Technology Project in Zhongshan City, Guangdong Province (grant number 2019AG029), (5) the Joint Fund of the Ministry of Education for Pre-research of Equipment (grant number 6141A02022257), (6)the Science Challenge Project (grant number TZ2016001), (7)the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 51861145306, 51872212 and 51972244), (8) the 111 Project (grant number B13035), (9) the International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China (grant number 2018YFE0103600, 2014DFA53090), (10)the Technological Innovation of Hubei Province, China (grant number 2019AAA030).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2020B010181001, 2021B0707050001, 2019B121204001), the Chaozhou Science and Technology Project (2019PT01), the Self-innovation Research Funding Project of Hanjiang Laboratory (HJL202012A001, HJL202012A002, HJL202012A003) and the Major Science and Technology Project in Zhongshan City, Guangdong Province (2019AG029). This work was also supported by the Joint Fund of the Ministry of Education for Pre-research of Equipment (6141A02022257), the Science Challenge Project (No. TZ2016001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51861145306, 51872212 and 51972244), and the 111 Project (B13035). It was also supported by the International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China (2018YFE0103600, 2014DFA53090), the Technological Innovation of Hubei Province, China (2019AAA030).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Casady, J.B.; Johnson, R.W. Status of silicon carbide (SiC) as a wide-bandgap semiconductor for high-temperature applications: A review. Solid State Electron. 1996, 39, 1409–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Han, J.; He, X.; Yao, W. Large-scale fabrication of lightweight Si/SiC ceramic composite optical mirror. Mater. Lett. 2004, 58, 1204–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dyomina, E.V.; Fenici, P.; Kolotov, V.P.; Zucchetti, M. Low-activation characteristics of V-alloys and SiC composites. J. Nucl. Mater. 1998, 258–263, 1784–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kim, D.J.; Choi, D.J. Microhardness and surface roughness of silicon carbide by chemical vapour deposition. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 1997, 16, 286–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cimalla, V.; Pezoldt, J.; Ambacher, O. Group III nitride and SiC based MEMS and NEMS: Materials properties, technology and applications. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2007, 40, 6386–6434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mehregany, M.; Zorman, C.A. SiC MEMS: Opportunities and challenges for applications in harsh environments. Thin Solid Films 1999, 355–556, 518–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sun, L.; Yuan, G.; Gao, L.; Yang, J.; Chhowalla, M.; Gharahcheshmeh, M.H.; Gleason, K.K.; Choi, Y.S.; Hong, B.H.; Liu, Z. Chemical vapour deposition. Nat. Rev. Methods Prim. 2021, 1, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dollet, A.; de Persis, S.; Pons, M.; Matecki, M. Simulation of SiC deposition from SiH4/C3H8/Ar/H2 mixtures in a cold-wall CVD reactor. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2004, 177–178, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Danno, K.; Hashimoto, K.; Saitoh, H.; Kimoto, T.; Matsunami, H. Low-Concentration Deep Traps in 4H-SiC Grown with High Growth Rate by Chemical Vapor Deposition. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 43, L969–L971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. La Via, F.; Galvagno, G.; Foti, G.; Mauceri, M.; Leone, S.; Pistone, G.; Abbondanza, G.; Veneroni, A.; Masi, M.; Valente, G.L.; et al. 4H SiC Epitaxial Growth with Chlorine Addition. Chem. Vap. Depos. 2006, 12, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Valente, G.; Cavallotti, C.; Masi, M.; Carrà, S. Reduced order model for the CVD of epitaxial silicon from silane and chlorosilanes. J. Cryst. Growth 2001, 230, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tu, R.; Zhang, X.; Lai, Y.; Han, M.; Zhang, S.; Shi, J.; Li, H.; Goto, T.; Zhang, L. Fabrication of an ultra-thick-oriented 3C-SiC coating on the inner surface of a graphite tube by high-frequency induction-heated halide chemical vapor deposition. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2019, 16, 1004–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gueorguiev, G.K.; Goyenola, C.; Schmidt, S.; Hultman, L. CF: A first-principles study of structural patterns arising during synthetic growth. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2011, 516, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Yang, Y.; Guo, Q.; Shi, J.; Liu, L. Preparation of SiC foams by CVI-R technique with SiCl4/H2/CH4 system. Mater. Lett. 2009, 63, 224–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sukegawa, Y.; Nogi, T.; Kihara, Y. In-cylinder airflow of automotive engine by quasi-direct numerical simulation. JSAE Rev. 2003, 24, 123–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chowdhury, I.; Chandrasekhar, M.V.S.; Klein, P.B.; Caldwell, J.D.; Sudarshan, T. High growth rate 4H-SiC epitaxial growth using dichlorosilane in a hot-wall CVD reactor. J. Cryst. Growth 2011, 316, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Yang, L.; Zhao, L.X.; Wu, H.W. Effect of temperature on conversion of basal plane dislocations to treading edge dislocations during 4H-SiC homoepitaxiy. J. Cryst. Growth 2020, 531, 125360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kimoto, T.; Nishino, H.; Yoo, W.S.; Matsunami, H. Growth mechanism of 6H-SiC in step-controlled epitaxy. J. Appl. Phys. 1993, 73, 726–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Feldman, D.W.; Parker, J.H.; Choyke, W.J.; Patrick, L. Phonon Dispersion Curves by Raman Scattering in SiC, polytypes 3C, 4H, 6H, 15R, and 21R. Phys. Rev. 1968, 173, 787–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Okumura, H.; Sakuma, E.; Lee, J.H.; Mukaida, H.; Misawa, S.; Endo, K.; Yoshida, S. Raman scattering of SiC: Application to the identification of heteroepitaxy of SiC polytypes. J. Appl. Phys. 1987, 61, 1134–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kamalakkannan, K.; Rajaraman, R.; Sundaravel, B.; Amarendra, G.; Sivaji, K. Effect of nitrogen ion implantation in semi insulating 6H-SiC and recrystallization probed by Raman scattering. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2019, 457, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Madito, M.J.; Hlatshwayo, T.T.; Mtshali, C.B. Chemical disorder of a-SiC layer induced in 6H-SiC by Cs and I ions co-implantation: Raman spectroscopy analysis. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 538, 148099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nakashima, S.; Nakatake, Y.; Ishida, Y.; Talkahashi, T.; Okumura, H. Detection of defects in SiC crystalline films by Raman. Phys. B 2001, 310, 684–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Temple, P.A.; Hathaway, C.E. Multiphonon Raman spectrum of silicon. Phys. Rev. B 1973, 7, 3685–3697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lotgering, F.K. Topotactical reactions with ferrimagnetic oxides having hexagonal crystal structures—II. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1960, 16, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chiew, Y.L.; Cheong, K.Y. A review on the synthesis of SiC from plant-based biomasses. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2011, 176, 951–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dawley, J.T.; Clem, P.G. Dielectric properties of random and <100> oriented SrTiO3 and (Ba,Sr)TiO3 thin films fabricated on <100> nickel tapes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 3028–3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the high-frequency induction CVD apparatus.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the high-frequency induction CVD apparatus.
Coatings 12 00329 g001
Figure 2. Temperature distribution in graphite tube from inlet to outlet and the position of 4H-SiC substrate prepared at different temperatures (AE) and the same temperature (EG).
Figure 2. Temperature distribution in graphite tube from inlet to outlet and the position of 4H-SiC substrate prepared at different temperatures (AE) and the same temperature (EG).
Coatings 12 00329 g002
Figure 3. Contour of gases’ velocity along the axial direction and radial direction.
Figure 3. Contour of gases’ velocity along the axial direction and radial direction.
Coatings 12 00329 g003
Figure 4. Contours of mass fraction of gaseous raw materials.
Figure 4. Contours of mass fraction of gaseous raw materials.
Coatings 12 00329 g004
Figure 5. Raman spectra of the SiC films prepared at Tdep = 1750 to 1950 K (position A to E in Figure 2) under the preset temperature of 1973 K at the C/Si ratio of 0.7 (ae), 1.0 (fj), 1.3(ko).
Figure 5. Raman spectra of the SiC films prepared at Tdep = 1750 to 1950 K (position A to E in Figure 2) under the preset temperature of 1973 K at the C/Si ratio of 0.7 (ae), 1.0 (fj), 1.3(ko).
Coatings 12 00329 g005
Figure 6. Crystalline phases distribution of the SiC films at different C/Si molar ratios and deposition temperatures (position A to E in Figure 2).
Figure 6. Crystalline phases distribution of the SiC films at different C/Si molar ratios and deposition temperatures (position A to E in Figure 2).
Coatings 12 00329 g006
Figure 7. FWHM of Raman LO peak of SiC films at various deposition rates (position A to E in Figure 2).
Figure 7. FWHM of Raman LO peak of SiC films at various deposition rates (position A to E in Figure 2).
Coatings 12 00329 g007
Figure 8. XRD patterns of the SiC films grown under the preset temperature of 1973 K at the C/Si ratio of 0.7 (ae), 1.0 (fj), 1.3 (ko).
Figure 8. XRD patterns of the SiC films grown under the preset temperature of 1973 K at the C/Si ratio of 0.7 (ae), 1.0 (fj), 1.3 (ko).
Coatings 12 00329 g008
Figure 9. FWHMs and Lotgering factors of 4H-SiC (004) prepared at RC/Si = 1.3 under the preset temperature of 1973 K at the position A to E in Figure 2.
Figure 9. FWHMs and Lotgering factors of 4H-SiC (004) prepared at RC/Si = 1.3 under the preset temperature of 1973 K at the position A to E in Figure 2.
Coatings 12 00329 g009
Figure 10. (a) Pole figure of the 4H-SiC substrate with a 4° off-angle; (b) The deposited SiC film at 1823 K and RC/Si = 1.3.
Figure 10. (a) Pole figure of the 4H-SiC substrate with a 4° off-angle; (b) The deposited SiC film at 1823 K and RC/Si = 1.3.
Coatings 12 00329 g010
Figure 11. Surficial SEM images at RC/Si = 0.7 (ac), 1.0 (df), 1.3 (gi) at 1750 (a,d,g), 1850 (b,e,h), 1950 K (c,f,i) under the preset temperature of 1973 K at the position E, C and A in Figure 2, respectively.
Figure 11. Surficial SEM images at RC/Si = 0.7 (ac), 1.0 (df), 1.3 (gi) at 1750 (a,d,g), 1850 (b,e,h), 1950 K (c,f,i) under the preset temperature of 1973 K at the position E, C and A in Figure 2, respectively.
Coatings 12 00329 g011
Figure 12. Fractural SEM images at RC/Si = 0.7 (ac), 1.0 (df), 1.3 (gi) at 1750 (a,d,g), 1850 (b,e,h), 1950 K (c,f,i) under the preset temperature of 1973 K at the position E, C and A in Figure 2, respectively.
Figure 12. Fractural SEM images at RC/Si = 0.7 (ac), 1.0 (df), 1.3 (gi) at 1750 (a,d,g), 1850 (b,e,h), 1950 K (c,f,i) under the preset temperature of 1973 K at the position E, C and A in Figure 2, respectively.
Coatings 12 00329 g012
Figure 13. (a) The thicknesses of thin films; (b) deposition rate of SiC films as a function of deposition temperature under the preset temperature of 1973 K at the position A to E in Figure 2.
Figure 13. (a) The thicknesses of thin films; (b) deposition rate of SiC films as a function of deposition temperature under the preset temperature of 1973 K at the position A to E in Figure 2.
Coatings 12 00329 g013
Figure 14. (a) Raman spectra, (b) XRD patterns, and SEM morphology of the films prepared at Tdep = 1750 K and RC/Si = 1.3 but different positions of 200 (c,f), 130 (d,g), 100 mm (e,h) corresponding to G, F and E in Figure 2.
Figure 14. (a) Raman spectra, (b) XRD patterns, and SEM morphology of the films prepared at Tdep = 1750 K and RC/Si = 1.3 but different positions of 200 (c,f), 130 (d,g), 100 mm (e,h) corresponding to G, F and E in Figure 2.
Coatings 12 00329 g014
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tu, R.; Liu, C.; Xu, Q.; Liu, K.; Li, Q.; Zhang, X.; Kosinova, M.L.; Goto, T.; Zhang, S. Epitaxial Growth of SiC Films on 4H-SiC Substrate by High-Frequency Induction-Heated Halide Chemical Vapor Deposition. Coatings 2022, 12, 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12030329

AMA Style

Tu R, Liu C, Xu Q, Liu K, Li Q, Zhang X, Kosinova ML, Goto T, Zhang S. Epitaxial Growth of SiC Films on 4H-SiC Substrate by High-Frequency Induction-Heated Halide Chemical Vapor Deposition. Coatings. 2022; 12(3):329. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12030329

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tu, Rong, Chengyin Liu, Qingfang Xu, Kai Liu, Qizhong Li, Xian Zhang, Marina L. Kosinova, Takashi Goto, and Song Zhang. 2022. "Epitaxial Growth of SiC Films on 4H-SiC Substrate by High-Frequency Induction-Heated Halide Chemical Vapor Deposition" Coatings 12, no. 3: 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12030329

APA Style

Tu, R., Liu, C., Xu, Q., Liu, K., Li, Q., Zhang, X., Kosinova, M. L., Goto, T., & Zhang, S. (2022). Epitaxial Growth of SiC Films on 4H-SiC Substrate by High-Frequency Induction-Heated Halide Chemical Vapor Deposition. Coatings, 12(3), 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12030329

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop