3.1. Complex Morphology Analysis
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the obtained engraved hallow nanostructures have been collected. The first set of engraved wires, with a depth of approximately 200 nm, have been obtained in a sequence of exposure doses ranging from 0.60 μC/cm
2 up to 0.79 μC/cm
2. The SEM image presented in
Figure 1a exhibits these traits in which the doses are increasing from the top of the image to the bottom. The best formed trait, shaped as rectangle with an optimal aspect ratio, was found to occur for an exposure dose of about 0.67 μC/cm
2. A second set of engraved wires, with a depth of 100 nm obtained under exposed doses ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 μC/cm
2, are shown in
Figure 1b.
In order to obtain regular shapes of various types of magnetic structures (rectangles, triangles and circular) using electron beam lithography, reactive ion etching was implemented to improve the definition of the patterned hallow shapes. The considered hallow structures engraved on photoresist films of 200 nm thickness consist of circular structures with diameters of 200 nm with different spacing (
Figure 1c), equilateral triangles with characteristic lengths of 200 nm and 400 nm, respectively (
Figure 1d), and simple circular structures with diameters of 335 nm as well as rectangular structures formed by overlapping the circular structures on the
y direction over 200 nm (
Figure 1e). The photoresist application, the metal deposition on the hallow structures and the lift-off procedures were similar across all the deposited samples. For each hallow shape, different dose values were considered from 0.6 μC/cm
2 to 0.79 μC/cm
2, with 0.1 μC/cm
2 discretization.
Finally,
Figure 1e shows a regular array of FePt circular dots obtained after the lift-off process following the growth of the successive Pt and Fe layers according to the previous section, on the array of engraved circular structures with diameters of 335 nm.
We have further chosen these regular arrays of FePt circular magnetic dots, for structural and magnetic characterization, considering the potential of such nanostructures to be developed into an array of nanodevices, individually addressable. The same annealing treatment was applied for the considered magnetic nanostructures in order to induce the L10 FePt phase of high coercivity. The influence of the dose value during the engraving process on the phase formation was also investigated.
The creation of a wide area of magnetic dots or nanostructures, regularly dispersed and integrated onto functionalized substrates with logic capabilities, would allow for the fabrication of complex architecture structures where the magnitude and direction of magnetic moments may be individually addressed and exploited for applications in the fields of magnetic nanosensors and molecular detection.
Systems exhibiting giant magnetoresistive effect (GMR) materials are generally made of conductive regions, alternated with or separated by magnetic regions [
16,
17]. In a trilayer-like GMR system, a conductive layer is sandwiched between two ferromagnetic layers of different magnetization reversal mechanisms. A spin reconfiguration in the ferromagnetic layers due to the application of a magnetic field causes the spin-dependent scattering of conduction electrons moving through the nm thick conductive layer. That means the resistance of the conductive film in the trilayer spin valve system switches from a low value in cases of parallel spin configuration in the two neighboring ferromagnetic layers to a higher value in cases of an antiparallel spin configuration in the two ferromagnetic layers. Usually, the different magnetic reversal in the two ferromagnetic layers can be induced by pinning one of the layers to an antiferromagnetic one, with the generation of a unidirectional anisotropy and an exchange bias effect at the level of the pinned layer. Alternatively, one of the layers could have a much higher coercive field than of the second layer with soft magnetic properties (low coercive field) [
18]. The presence of a small external magnetic field will easily change the magnetic configuration of the soft magnetic layer and, so, it can be easily detected by the changes in the resistivity of the spin valve system. This change in resistivity will be induced either in the case of in plane or out of plane anisotropy of the low coercive free and the high coercive pinned layers, the only condition being to have the driving field coplanar with the anisotropy axis in the layers. In this respect, the L1
0-phase of FePt films of high coercivity can be successfully used in spin valve systems, with either perpendicular anisotropy, usually requested by the magnetic recording elements, or in-plane anisotropy, requested for other types of applications (bio-medical, displacement or angular sensors). However, magnetic anisotropy can be changed from in plane to perpendicular to the plane by tuning the thickness of the FePt layers or the specific preparation conditions. In addition, it was shown in [
19] that in the case of in-plane anisotropy of the free soft magnetic layer of an exchange bias spin valve structure, its hysteretic opening can be drastically diminished if the anisotropy direction of the free layer can be oriented perpendicularly to the pinning direction. This adjustment can be achieved by a so-called biasing process through a patterned hard magnetic layer next to the spin valve structure. Although Nd-Fe-B biasing layers are actually used in this respect, FePt biasing layers can be proposed in the future due to their much higher corrosion resistance, within the condition of competitive production costs.
3.2. Structural Analysis of the Regular Arrays of Magnetic Structures
The regular arrays of magnetic dots, periodically dispersed, that are imaged in
Figure 1f have been structurally investigated by means of X-ray diffraction, in a grazing incidence geometry. Such grazing geometry of the X-ray beam incidence has been carefully chosen, with an angle of 0.8 up to 1.5 degrees, in such a manner as to minimize the effect and influence of the substrate contribution into the overall patterns. The diffractograms have been recorded between 20 and 95 degrees in 2 theta. For better clarity of the structure of the regular arrays, the diffractogram of the pristine substrate in the absence of the engraved regular arrays was also recorded and subsequently subtracted from the diffractogram of the investigated samples, the difference being normalized afterwards for a better clarity. We have thus obtained a clear X-ray spectrum, consisting of diffracted beams originating only from the regular array of FePt circular dots. It is known that, usually, the bulk FePt binary alloy, either equiatomic or off-stoichiometric, is formed in a disordered A1-type cubic structure and, upon annealing, it undergoes a structural disorder–order phase transformation. Following such a transformation, the FePt would exhibit the ordered, tetragonal L1
0 FePt phase, which is the phase responsible for the hard magnetic properties of the system.
In
Figure 2 are depicted the XRD patterns corresponding to the circular FePt dots obtained via exposure doses of 0.6 μC/cm
2 and at 0.79 μC/cm
2, respectively, the growth of Pt (30 nm thickness) and Fe (40 nm thickness) films, the lift-off process and subsequent annealing at 400 °C for 30 min. All the main Bragg lines of tetragonal L1
0 FePt are observed in both samples.
There is a strong presence of the superlattice peaks: (001) and (110) diffraction lines, as well as the presence of the main (111) Bragg lines followed by other superlattice peaks: distinctly split (200) fundamental reflection, recorded at around 48–49 degrees in 2 theta. It has to be mentioned that the two main superlattice peaks of tetragonal L10, the (001) and (110) reflections, occurs for the Cu Kα radiation we used at about 23° and 32°, respectively.
It also has to be mentioned that the main six Bragg lines of the tetragonal FePt, from lower to higher angles, are, in order, attributed to (001), (110), (111), (200), (020), (002), (220), (022), (311) and (222)
hkl planes reflections. The peak assignation has been performed in agreement with the ICSD card 03-065-9121. The L10 phase lattice parameters, calculated from the full-profile analysis were found to be a = 0.384(3) nm and c = 0.317(5) nm, with an ordering parameter c/a = 0.825. In addition to the occurrence of the superlattice peaks (001) and (110) another distinct signature of the occurrence of the tetragonal L1
0 phase is the fact that the (200), (220) and (311) peaks are split into two. Such a feature has been encountered in other works on FePt [
20,
21,
22] and has been unambiguously regarded as further proof of the occurrence of the L1
0 phase, this being due to the tetragonally distorted planes, giving rise to the spectral splitting observed in these peaks. Upon the fitting of the XRD spectra, we have also derived the average crystallite size of the L1
0 FePt. It has been thus observed that the average grain size of the tetragonal L1
0 phase increases with the exposure dose from 20 nm (for engraving with a dose of 0.6 μC/cm
2) to 24 nm (for engraving with a dose of 0.79 μC/cm
2). We conclude that in these XRD results, only the L1
0 phase has been identified. In relation to previous studies [
7,
8], where it has been shown that not all the FePt dots were transformed from a cubic A1 to tetragonal L1
0 structure, which was detrimental to the magnetic anisotropy, in our case, all the observed dots seemed to be in their ordered L1
0 tetragonal crystal structure.
3.3. High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy and Electron Diffraction Results
The microstructure of the granular regions on the magnetic dots’ surfaces, in the sample presented in
Figure 1f, has been imaged with the help of the transmission electron microscopy in the high-resolution mode, coupled with the observation of the electron diffraction patterns, within the imaged areas on the dot surface. In the imaging area, the sample has been thinned down by ion etching of the substrate with the focused ion beam module of the microscope. A typical magnified image obtained in HRTEM is shown in
Figure 3, on the left side. The high-resolution image, recorded in phase contrast imaging mode, reveals small nanocrystals of ordered tetragonal L1
0 FePt symmetry. The observed microstructure is apparently made of ordered FePt crystallites having a size between 4 and 8 nm, approximately, which are distributed within a wide area between 13 and 18 nm. The reticular interplanar distances, clearly observed and measured on the image, are proving the occurrence of the (110) and (1-10) superlattice reflections, which are indeed typical for the tetragonal L1
0 FePt phase. This confirms well, in a more illustrative way, the findings obtained from the XRD analysis, detailed above. Another main Bragg reflection of the L1
0 phase, the (200) reflection, is also observed and accurately measured on the image through the measuring of the interplanar distance. Taking into account that the limiting critical size for single-magnetic domains is 55 nm for L1
0 FePt nanograins [
23], it can safely be concluded that the FePt crystallites are magnetically single domains, irrespective of their crystal symmetry or of their degree of crystallographic ordering. On the right side of the image of
Figure 3, the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) image is depicted, corresponding to the area that is imaged in real space in
Figure 3, on the left side. Being essentially a map of the reciprocal space, the SAED image illustrates via the brightness of the observed spots, the intensity of the corresponding planar reflection, indicating thus quantitatively the abundance of the ordered FePt grains. It is seen that SAED analysis also confirms the occurrence of the ordered L1
0 FePt phase in the imaged magnetic dot. The presence of the main superlattice spots, the (001) and (110) Bragg reflections of the L1
0 phase, in the SAED patterns, proves the occurrence of both crystallographic orientations, with the tetragonal c-axis perpendicular and parallel to the surface normal. Here, the atomic planes of a (110) nature are seen, which again confirms the occurrence of the superlattice reflections.
It is to be noted though that while
Figure 3 is only an illustrative example, several other high-resolution images have been recorded, and nanocrystals of a tetragonal symmetry with detectable (001) planes, with a reticular distance of d
001 = 3.78 Å, are observed in many other imaged areas, thus confirming the extended L1
0 ordering alongside the magnetic dot surface. It has been explained before that two crystallograhic variants are retrieved, one having the c-axis in plane and the other one having the c-axis in an orientation normal to the observing plane. Another (001) superlattice reflection, with a reticular distance of d
001 = 3.67 Å, is also identified in various other imaged areas. All the
c lattice parameter values measured in the observed nanocrystals with tetragonal symmetry are in good agreement with the XRD results. In the same image, a second superlattice spot attributed to the (110) Bragg reflection is observed, with a reticular distance d
110 = 1.91 Å.
All the structural data are thus consistent with each other and are unambiguously proving the formation of the highly ordered L10 FePt, of tetragonal symmetry in the analyzed samples.
3.4. Magnetic Investigations of the Regular Arrays of Magnetic Nanostructures
In order to assess the magnetic performances of the arrays, an investigation using the Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS) was undertaken. Magnetic hysteresis loops were measured both at 5K and at 300K in parallel and perpendicular orientation, in an applied field of up to 12 Tesla.
Figure 4 depicts the magnetization reversal behavior of the regular array of FePt circular dots, namely the sample imaged in
Figure 1f.
As mentioned before, the diffraction measurements did not provide any significant structural differences between samples with various exposure rates of the engraving. Only a slightly larger size of the L10 FePt crystallites at increasing doses could be mentioned, with no direct influence on the magnetic reversal. In this respect, we have chosen to show only the sample engraved with the maximum exposure rate of 0.79 μC/cm2. Notably, the sample engraved at 0.6 μC/cm2 had shown quite similar magnetic reversal, proving that the involved change in the engraving rate does not change the damaging of the dot edges.
The shape of the hysteresis loops is compatible with the presence of the L10 FePt phase, exhibiting increased saturation magnetization, remanent magnetization and magnetic coercivity. Due to the distance between the dots, their magnetic interaction should be neglected and the hysteresis loop should reflect an average of the magnetization reversal of each individual dot.
The magnetic hysteresis loops, recorded both in perpendicular and parallel geometry, do not show shoulders on the demagnetization curve. This indicates, on one side, the monophased magnetic character of the sample and, on the other side, it assures a full exchange coupling between FePt nanograins across all the investigated arrays. This is in agreement with the observed microstructure, composed of hard L10 binary FePt.
Another important observation is the fact that, at 300K, there are strong differences between the shape of the hysteresis loops recorded in parallel and in perpendicular geometry. The elongated shape of the loop in perpendicular geometry, as opposed to the rectangular shape in the case of the loop in parallel geometry, witness a pronounced in-plane magnetocrystalline anisotropy. Indeed, it was shown that such nano-islands of FePt can exhibit a strong magnetocrystalline anisotropy of about 7 × 10
6 J/m
3 [
24] which should be correlated to a high coercive field along the in-plane magnetic easy axes. It was shown in [
18,
25] that in the case of no superposition between the coercive or switching field of the magnetization reversal along an easy axis and the saturation field of the magnetization reversal perpendicular to the easy axis, the magnetization reversal mechanism occurs through nucleation and movements of magnetic domains. In the present case, the coercive field measured in parallel geometry at 300 and 5K is of 4.5 and 8.0 kOe (i.e., µ
0H is 0.45 T and 0.8 T), respectively. Moreover, the saturation field at 300 K in perpendicular geometry is about five times higher than the coercive field in parallel geometry, providing evidence for the formation of magnetic domains in the dots. Indeed, taking into account the limiting critical size of 55 nm for single-magnetic domains for L1
0 FePt nanograins as reported in [
23], the present magnetic dots with a lateral size of 335 nm and 70 nm in thickness are susceptible to the formation of magnetic domains. However, the polycrystalline configuration of the dots with well-formed L1
0 FePt nanograins, of 5 to 20 nm in size, of enhanced magnetocrystalline anisotropy suggests the consideration of the magnetic dot as an Imry and Ma type random anisotropy ferromagnet [
26] consisting of a superposition of interacting magnetic domains of Stoner–Wohlfarth type associated to the L1
0 FePt nanograins. This behavior is in agreement with the structural observation of different orientations of the c axis of the FePt nanograins, also offering complementary information for the mainly in-plane random distribution of the c axis.
For the calculation of the specific magnetization values, we assumed the sample geometry as being the one observed in the SEM images, such as
Figure 1f, with a total assumed thickness of the dots close to the nominal one of 70 nm. For the calculation of the filling factor, we assumed a regular array, as in the one in
Figure 1f, where the dots of 335 nm diameter are spaced by 1200 nm in each direction. Taking into account the size of the image and the number of dots per image, we have calculated a filling factor of about 12.7%. The values of magnetization reported on the ordinate of
Figure 4 refer to the magnetic moment on the surface unit of the measured sample. This means that the magnetic moment at saturation per unit surface of magnetic material is about 1 × 10
−3 emu/cm
2 times 100/12.7, i.e., about 7.9 × 10
−3 emu/cm
2. For a film with a nominal thickness of 70 nm, this results in a saturation magnetization of about 1100 emu/cm
3, which is in close agreement with the spontaneous magnetization of the L1
0 FePt bulk alloys. Also, the remanent magnetization values are high, namely 750 emu/cm
3 (690 emu/cm
3 at 300K), comparable with those of the L1
0 FePt bulk alloys. It is important to notice that in the investigated array of FePt circular dots, the microstructure consists of only the tetragonal L1
0 phase and this microstructure is well reflected in the overall magnetic behavior. The saturation magnetization is also proven to be high, a good prerequisite for obtaining an elevated maximum energy product (BH
max) which is the Figure of Merit for any nanomagnetic structure, albeit nanoparticle, thin film or structured dot. These findings are encouraging, as they show the potential for developing regular arrays of uniformly shaped magnetic entities with good magnetic performances in view of potential uses in various applications, from biomagnetic sensing through magnetoresistance effects to heated-dot magnetic recording.