Next Article in Journal
Duplex Surface Modification of M2 High-Speed Steel
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Characterization of Titania-Coated Hollow Mesoporous Hydroxyapatite Composites for Photocatalytic Degradation of Methyl Red Dye in Water
Previous Article in Journal
Catalytic Activity Evaluation of Molten Salt-Treated Stainless Steel Electrodes for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction in Alkaline Medium
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Manufacturing Method for High-Reliability Multilayer Flexible Electronics by Electrohydrodynamic Printing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Experimental and Adsorption Kinetics Study of Hg0 Removal from Flue Gas by Silver-Loaded Rice Husk Gasification Char

1
Nanxun Innovation Institute, Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou 310018, China
2
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2024, 14(7), 797; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14070797
Submission received: 22 May 2024 / Revised: 20 June 2024 / Accepted: 24 June 2024 / Published: 26 June 2024

Abstract

:
Coal holds a significant position in China’s energy consumption structure. However, the release of Hg0 during coal combustion poses a serious threat to human health. Traditional activated carbon for Hg0 removal is expensive; finding efficient, inexpensive and renewable adsorbents for Hg0 removal has become a top priority. Rice husk gasification char (RHGC) is a solid waste generated by biomass gasification power generation, which, loaded with silver to remove Hg0, could achieve the purpose of waste treatment. This paper examines the Hg0 removal performance of silver-loaded rice husk gasification char (SRHGC) under different operating conditions through experimental analysis. This study employed quasi-first-order, quasi-second-order, and internal diffusion kinetics adsorption equations to model the amount of Hg0 removed by SRHGC at different temperatures, thereby inferring the reaction mechanism. The results indicate that Hg0 removal efficiency of SRHGC increased by about 80%. The Hg0 removal ability was directly related to silver load, and the amount of Hg0 removed by SRHGC did not a exhibit a simple inverse relationship with particle size. Additionally, the Hg0 removal efficiency of SRHGC declined with increasing adsorption temperature. The removal of Hg0 by SRHGC conformed to the quasi-second-order kinetic equation, with the adsorption rate constant decreasing as the temperature rose, consistent with experimental observations. This paper provides both experimental and theoretical references for future modification and optimization of RHGC for coal-fired flue gas treatment, and also offers valuable insights into Hg0 removal by carbon-based adsorbents.

1. Introduction

With the development of the economy and the improvement of living standards, the demand for energy and electricity has grown rapidly [1]. In 2022, global energy consumption reached an all-time high, with primary energy consumption totaling 20.6 billion tons of standard coal, marking a 2.2% year-on-year increase and essentially returning to the average growth level prior to the pandemic [2]. Coal would occupy a long-term position in China’s energy structure. In 2023, China consumed 5.72 billion tons of standard coal, accounting for 55.3% of its total energy consumption. The flue gas released by coal burning contains CO2, NOX, SO2, and the heavy metal mercury; these pollutants can cause serious environmental pollution. CO2 causes the greenhouse effect, SO2 and NOX cause acid rain, and mercury causes mental illness [3,4]. The control technologies for SO2, NOX, and CO2 are relatively mature and could effectively remove these pollutants using adsorbents or devices [5,6]. However, Hg0 removal technology is still in the development stage. Hg0 is highly toxic, volatile, lipophilic, and bio-accumulative, and would seriously harm human health [7,8,9,10]. Furthermore, Hg0 is insoluble in water, making it difficult to remove using traditional separation technologies [11].
Activated carbon (AC) is effective in removing Hg0 from coal-fired flue gas, but the cost is high [12,13,14]. Therefore, finding an efficient and cost-effective adsorbent is imperative. Rice husk gasification char (RHGC), a solid waste from biomass gasification power generation, has gained increasing attention for recycling due to the “zero-waste city” concept [15]. RHGC possesses highly active surface functional groups and a developed microporous structure, making it an effective adsorbent for Hg0 in flue gas. Loading RHGC with silver (SRHGC) enhances its Hg0 removal capabilities and supports waste treatment objectives. Additionally, SRHGC can be regenerated after heating, making it a potential long-term adsorbent [16,17]. There are limited studies on Hg0 removal using RHGC, especially after silver loading. This article provides valuable insights and a reference for future researchers studying Hg0 removal with RHGC.
Removing Hg0 with adsorbents is a complex process involving both surface adsorption and internal diffusion. Domestic and international scholars have predicted the performance of carbon-based adsorbents for Hg0 removal by establishing various models [18]. This study investigated the Hg0 removal performance of SRHGC under different conditions through experimental studies. Additionally, the quasi-first-order kinetic equation, the quasi-second-order kinetic equation, and the intraparticle diffusion equation were used to simulate the Hg0 removal behavior of SRHGC at different adsorption temperatures, providing further insights into the Hg0 removal mechanism. In the context of carbon neutrality and carbon peak goals, utilizing inexpensive and renewable SRHGC for Hg0 removal is particularly relevant. Applying simulated kinetics methods to predict experimental results enhances the efficiency, economy, and predictability of the experiments, offering significant economic and practical benefits.

2. Materials and Methods

In the experiment, RHGC was obtained from the Jiangsu Gaoyou biomass gasification power plant. The carbon content was 43.58%, determined using a German Elementar Vario ELIII element analyzer (analytical precision C ≤ 0.1 abs). After drying, grinding, and sieving, particle sizes of 97–125 µm, 125–200 µm, and 200–450 µm were selected for use. RHGC (particle size 125–200 µm) was impregnated with 20% hydrochloric acid for 30 min, placed in a vacuum oven at 50 °C for 2 h, cooled to room temperature, washed to neutrality with deionized water, and dried for later use. A total of 6 mL of silver nitrate solution with a mass concentration of 2 mg/mL was placed in a beaker, and the pH was adjusted to 9.7 with ammonia water. A total of 300 mg of dried RHGC was added and the mixture was shaken at a constant temperature of 298 K for 24 h. RHGC was then filtered and placed in an electric furnace tube, where Ag(NH3)2+ was reduced to elemental silver under a N2 atmosphere at 120 °C for 4 h. After the reduction process was complete, heating was stopped and the sample, which was silver-loaded rice husk gasification char (labeled as SRHGC, mass ratio of AgNO3 to RHGC of approximately 40 mg/g), was allowed to cool to room temperature before being removed and stored in a desiccator for later use. The same method was used to prepare SRHGC-20 (mass ratio of AgNO3 to RHGC was about 20 mg/g) and SRHGC-60 (mass ratio of AgNO3 to RHGC was about 60 mg/g), which were stored in a desiccator for later use. The experiment was conducted in a fixed-bed experimental setup [19].

3. Results

3.1. X-ray Diffraction

Qualitative analysis of the phase and composition of SRHGC was conducted using a Rigaku D/max-2550 PC XRD analyzer from Japan. The XRD pattern of SRHGC is shown in Figure 1. A relatively sharp diffraction peak appeared near the diffraction angle 2θ = 24°, indicating that SRHGC was amorphous with a certain degree of crystallinity. A very sharp diffraction peak at 2θ = 38° was observed, which was a typical characteristic diffraction peak of elemental silver, confirming the presence of elemental silver in RHGC. The height and sharpness of this peak reflected the silver content and crystallinity in the sample. Additionally, a sharp diffraction peak at 2θ = 78° was noted, caused by silver entering RHGC through ion exchange, further confirming the successful loading of silver onto RHGC.

3.2. Hg0 Removal Performance of SRHGC under Different Conditions

3.2.1. Hg0 Removal Performance of Different Adsorbents

For the experiment, 300 mg each of RHGC, SRHGC, and AC were selected, along with an additional 450 mg of SRHGC (labeled as 2-SRHGC). The experimental conditions were set as follows: the temperature was maintained at 160 °C, the equilibrium gas was N2 with a flow rate of 3 L/min, the inlet concentration of Hg0 was 38.6 μg/m3, and the adsorption time was 120 min. The experimental results are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2 shows that the Hg0 removal efficiency stabilized after 20 min. The Hg0 removal efficiencies of the four adsorbents followed this order: RHGC < SRHGC < AC < 2-SRHGC. The Hg0 removal efficiency of RHGC increased by nearly 80%. Although the Hg0 removal efficiency of an equivalent amount of SRHGC was lower than that of AC, increasing the quantity of SRHGC to 450 mg resulted in a higher Hg0 removal efficiency compared to AC. This improvement was attributed to the increased mass, which provided a longer contact time between the adsorbent and mercury vapor, thereby enhancing Hg0 removal efficacy. As a cost-effective industrial solid waste, SRHGC has the potential to replace AC for Hg0 removal.

3.2.2. Effect of Different Silver Loads on Hg0 Removal Performance of SRHGC

For the experiment, 300 mg each of SRHGC-20, SRHGC, and SRHGC-60 were selected. The experimental conditions were as follows: the temperature was maintained at 160 °C, the equilibrium gas was N2 with a flow rate of 3 L/min, the inlet concentration of Hg0 was 38.6 μg/m3, and the adsorption time was 120 min. The experimental results are shown in Figure 3.
As seen in Figure 3, SRHGC-60 exhibited the highest Hg0 removal efficiency, followed by SRHGC and then SRHGC-20. The Hg0 removal ability was directly related to the silver load. After adsorption stabilization, the Hg0 removal efficiency of SRHGC-60 reached 100%, SRHGC achieved about 90%, and SRHGC-20 attained 70%. Considering both silver load and efficiency, SRHGC demonstrated the best overall performance in removing Hg0.

3.2.3. Effect of Different Particle Sizes on Hg0 Removal Performance of SRHGC

For the experiment, 300 mg of SRHGC with particle sizes of 97–125 µm, 125–200 µm, and 200–450 µm were selected. The experimental conditions were as follows: the temperature was maintained at 160 °C, the equilibrium gas was N2 with a flow rate of 3 L/min, the inlet concentration of Hg0 was 38.6 μg/m3, and the adsorption time was 120 min. The experimental results are shown in Figure 4.
As shown in Figure 4, the Hg0 adsorption capacity was 41.79 μg/g for particles sized 200–450 µm, increased to 43.54 μg/g for particles sized 125–200 µm, and was 42.87 μg/g for particles sized 97–125 µm. This variation was due to the relationship between particle size and factors such as mass transfer resistance, specific surface area, and the internal diffusion coefficient of SRHGC. When particle size decreased, the specific surface area increased, and the internal diffusion coefficient also rose, facilitating the diffusion of Hg0 to the surface of the adsorption layer and enhancing the adsorption of Hg0 by SRHGC. At this stage, the positive effects dominated. However, further reduction in particle size increased the mass transfer resistance of the adsorption layer, leading to a rise in penetration pressure drop. Beyond a certain range, the specific surface area of SRHGC no longer increased with decreasing particle size, and the pressure drop continued to rise, weakening the effect of physical adsorption. Consequently, the negative effects became more significant. Therefore, to improve the Hg0 adsorption performance of the adsorbent, the positive effects should outweigh the negative effects. Based on these findings, a particle size of 125–200 µm was selected for this experiment [20,21].

3.2.4. Effect of Different Temperatures on Hg0 Removal Performance of SRHGC

For this experiment, 300 mg of SRHGC with a particle size of 125–200 µm was selected. The experimental temperatures were set at 120 °C, 160 °C, and 200 °C. The equilibrium gas was N2 with a flow rate of 3 L/min, the inlet concentration of Hg0 was 38.6 μg/m3, and the adsorption time was 120 min. The results are shown in Figure 5. The Hg0 adsorption capacities of SRHGC at 120 °C, 160 °C, and 200 °C were approximately 44.09 μg/g, 43.54 μg/g, and 41.15 μg/g, respectively. As the temperature increased, the Hg0 adsorption capacity consistently decreased. This trend could be attributed to the nature of adsorption pores on the surface of SRHGC, where physical adsorption was predominant, and gaseous mercury was preferentially adsorbed at lower temperatures. As the temperature rose, the chemisorption rate surpassed the physical adsorption rate, potentially destroying the chemical bonds of oxygen-containing functional groups. Moreover, Hg0 might degrade on the surface of SRHGC due to high temperatures, leading to a decrease in chemisorption capacity. Consequently, the adsorption capacity of SRHGC diminished at higher temperatures, with the rate of decline accelerating with temperature. Based on these findings, 160 °C was selected for this experiment.

3.3. Adsorption Kinetics Study of Hg0 Removal by SRHGC

The experimental data for Hg0 removal by SRHGC at 120 °C (SRHCC-120), 160 °C (SRHCC-160), and 200 °C (SRHCC-200) were analyzed and fitted by using the quasi-first-order kinetic equation [22], the quasi-second-order kinetic equation [23] and the in-particle diffusion equation [24], the aim of which was to further study the mechanism of removing Hg0 from SRHGC at different temperatures. In the figure below, qe is the adsorption amount of mercury on the adsorbent at adsorption equilibrium (μg/g); qt is the adsorption amount of mercury on the adsorbent at time t (μg/g); t is the adsorption time (min); k1 is the rate constant of the adsorption quasi-first-order model (min−1); k2 is the rate constant of the bi-media rate equation (g/μg·min); C is related to the thickness at the boundary (μg/g); h and R2 are the fitting parameters. The results are shown below.

3.3.1. Quasi-First-Order Kinetic Equation Fitting

According to the kinetic fitting results in Figure 6, the relevant kinetic parameters and correlation coefficients were obtained, as shown in Table 1.

3.3.2. Quasi-Second-Order Kinetic Equation Fitting

According to the kinetic fitting results in Figure 7, the relevant kinetic parameters and correlation coefficients were obtained, as shown in Table 2.

3.3.3. In-Particle Diffusion Equation Fitting

According to the kinetic fitting results in Figure 8, the relevant kinetic parameters and correlation coefficients were obtained, as shown in Table 3.
Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8 show the fitting of Hg0 adsorption capacity of SRHGC at different temperatures using the quasi-first-order, quasi-second-order, and internal diffusion kinetic equations, respectively. Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3 present the parameters obtained by fitting three kinetic equations at different temperatures. The fact that none of the lines in Figure 4 pass through the origin indicates that intraparticle diffusion is not the sole factor controlling the adsorption process. The adsorption of Hg0 on the adsorbent surface was divided into two stages: internal diffusion and surface adsorption. In the initial stage, the adsorption rate was faster, while the internal diffusion rate was slower. The R2 of the quasi-second-order kinetic fitting parameters were all above 0.993. The fitting curves were also very consistent with the experimental data of SRHGC, indicating that the adsorption of Hg0 on SRHGC conforms to the quasi-second-order kinetic equation. It can be seen from Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3 that the adsorption rate constant of the quasi-first-order, quasi-second-order, and internal diffusion kinetic equations decreases with the increase in temperature, indicating that the adsorption performance of the adsorbent Hg0 decreases with the increase in temperature, hindering the adsorption of Hg0, which was consistent with the experimental results.

4. Conclusions

This paper investigated the Hg0 removal performance of silver-loaded rice husk gasification char (SRHGC) under various operating conditions through experimental studies. The adsorption kinetics were analyzed using quasi-first-order, quasi-second-order, and intraparticle diffusion equations to model the amount of Hg0 adsorbed by SRHGC at different temperatures, thereby inferring the reaction mechanism. The results show that the Hg0 removal efficiency of SRHGC improved by approximately 80%. The amount of Hg0 removed by SRHGC did not exhibit a simple inverse relationship with particle size, and the Hg0 removal efficiency decreased with increasing adsorption temperature. The process of removing Hg0 from SRHGC followed the quasi-second-order kinetic equation, with the adsorption rate constant decreasing as the temperature increased, consistent with the experimental findings. This study provides both experimental and theoretical references for the subsequent modification and selection of adsorbents. It also lays a solid foundation for the application of RHGC in the environmental protection field, particularly in the efficient removal of Hg0 from flue gas, offering significant economic and practical benefits.

Author Contributions

Survey, R.Y. and Y.D.; experiment, R.Y.; data analysis, R.Y.; draw, Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, R.Y.; writing—review and editing, R.Y. and H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by “Nanxun Scholars program of ZJWEU” (RC2022010919).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Liu, H.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, J.; Li, Y.; Zeng, Z.; Zhang, S.; Xu, X.; Ji, F.; Li, D.; et al. The application road of silicon-based anode in lithium-ion batteries: From liquid electrolyte to solid-state electrolyte. Energy Storage Mater. 2023, 55, 244–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Xie, K. Challenges and approaches of clean and efficient coal conversion in the context of new energy system development. J. Coal Sci. 2024, 1, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Aaron, D.; Tsouris, C. Separation of CO2 from Flue Gas: A review. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2005, 40, 321–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhong, L.; Xiao, P.; Jiang, J.; Guo, T.; Guo, A. Coal-fired power plants of atmospheric mercury emission monitoring method analysis and test study. Proc. CSEE 2012, 32, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hassanpouryouzband, A.; Yang, J.; Tohidi, B.; Chuvilin, E.M.; Istomin, V.; Bukhanov, B.A.; Cheremisin, A. CO2 Capture by Injection of Flue Gas or CO2–N2 Mixtures into Hydrate Reservoirs: Dependence of CO2 Capture Efficiency on Gas Hydrate Reservoir Conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 4324–4330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hassanpouryouzband, A.; Joonaki, E.; Farahani, M.V.; Takeya, S.; Ruppel, C.; Yang, J.; English, N.J.; Schicks, J.M.; Edlmann, K.; Mehrabian, H. Gas hydrates in sustainable chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 5225–5309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Draseh, G.; O’Reilly, S.B.; Beinhoff, C.; Roider, G.; Maydl, S. The Mt. Diwata Study on the Philippines 1999 Assessing Mereury Intoxication of the Population by Small Seale Gold Mining. Sci. Total Environ. 2001, 267, 151–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zeng, Z.F.; Liu, T.X.; Li, H.M.; Hao, R.L. Research progress of adsorbents for mercury removal from coal flue gas. Appl. Chem. Ind. 2023, 52, 1170–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abbasi, N.M.; Hameed, M.U.; Nasim, N.; Ahmed, F.; Altaf, F.; Shahida, S.; Fayyaz, S.; Sabir, S.M.; Bocchetta, P. Plasmonic Nano Silver: An Efficient Colorimetric Sensor for the Selective Detection of Hg2+ Ions in Real Samples. Coatings 2022, 12, 763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Y.; Yu, J.; Liu, Y.; Huang, R.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, Y. A review on removal of mercury from flue gas utilizing existing air pollutant control devices (apcds). J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 427, 128132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Y.; Zeng, J.; Xu, L.; Liu, X.; Li, L.; Wang, H. Removal of Elemental Mercury from Simulated Flue Gas by a Copper-Based ZSM-5 Molecular Sieve. Coatings 2022, 12, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, J.; Zhao, Z.; Huang, T.; Sheng, P.; Zhang, J.; Tian, H.; Zhao, X.; Zhao, L.; He, P.; Ren, J.; et al. Removal of elemental mercury by Ce-Mn co-modified activated carbon catalyst. Catal. Commun. 2017, 93, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rungnim, C.; Promarak, V.; Hannongbua, S.; Kungwan, N.; Namuangruk, S. Complete reaction mechanisms of mercury oxidation on halogenated activated carbon. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 310, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sun, P.; Zhang, B.; Zeng, X.; Luo, G.; Li, X.; Yao, H.; Zheng, C. Deep study on effects of activated carbon’s oxygen functional groups for elemental mercury adsorption using temperature programmed desorption method. Fuel 2017, 200, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, S. A high proportion reuse of RAP in plant-mixed cold recycling technology and its benefits analysis. Coatings 2022, 12, 1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sun, H. Study on Controllable Synthesis of Molecular Sieve Loaded Silver Composite and Performance in Removing Hg0 from Natural Gas. Master’s Thesis, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  17. Xu, H.; Qu, Z.; Huang, W.; Mei, J.; Chen, W.; Zhao, S.; Yan, N. Regenerable Ag/graphene sorbent for elemental mercury capture at ambient temperature. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2015, 476, 47683–47689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, T.G. Study of Mercury Kinetics and Control Methodogies in Simulates Combustion Flue Gases. Bachelor’s Thesis, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yang, R.; Diao, Y.; Befkadu, A. Removal of Hg0 from simulated flue gas over silver-loaded rice husk gasification char. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2018, 5, 180248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Joseph, R.F.; Radisav, D.V.; Wei, L.; Robert, C.T. Modeling Powdered Activated Carbon Injection for the Uptake of Elemental Mercury Vapors. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 1998, 48, 1051–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yan, R.; Liang, D.T.; Tsen, L.; Wong, Y.P.; Lee, Y.K. Bench-scale experimental evaluation of carbon performance on mercury vapour adsorption. Fuel 2004, 83, 2401–2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Skodras, G.; Diamantopoulou, I.; Pantoleontos, G.; Sakellaropoulos, G.P. Kinetic studies of elemental mercury adsorption in activated carbon fixed bed reactor. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 158, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ho, Y.S.; Mckay, G. Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem. 1999, 34, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhou, Q. Experimental and Mechanism Study of Mercury Removal by Injection of Modified Adsorbent. Doctoral Thesis, Southeast University, Nanjing, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. XRD pattern of SRHGC.
Figure 1. XRD pattern of SRHGC.
Coatings 14 00797 g001
Figure 2. Hg0 removal performance of different adsorbents.
Figure 2. Hg0 removal performance of different adsorbents.
Coatings 14 00797 g002
Figure 3. Effect of different silver loads on Hg0 removal performance of SRHGC.
Figure 3. Effect of different silver loads on Hg0 removal performance of SRHGC.
Coatings 14 00797 g003
Figure 4. Effect of different particle sizes on Hg0 removal performance of SRHGC.
Figure 4. Effect of different particle sizes on Hg0 removal performance of SRHGC.
Coatings 14 00797 g004
Figure 5. Effect of different temperatures on Hg0 removal performance of SRHGC.
Figure 5. Effect of different temperatures on Hg0 removal performance of SRHGC.
Coatings 14 00797 g005
Figure 6. Quasi-first-order kinetic simulation of SRHGC Hg0 removal.
Figure 6. Quasi-first-order kinetic simulation of SRHGC Hg0 removal.
Coatings 14 00797 g006
Figure 7. Quasi-secondary dynamics simulation of SRHGC Hg0 removal.
Figure 7. Quasi-secondary dynamics simulation of SRHGC Hg0 removal.
Coatings 14 00797 g007
Figure 8. Kinetic simulation of internal diffusion of SRHGC Hg0 removal.
Figure 8. Kinetic simulation of internal diffusion of SRHGC Hg0 removal.
Coatings 14 00797 g008
Table 1. Related parameters of quasi-first-order dynamic equation.
Table 1. Related parameters of quasi-first-order dynamic equation.
SampleqeK1R2
SRHGC-12044.090.0220.95199
SRHGC-16043.540.02160.95164
SRHGC-20041.150.021350.95307
Table 2. Related parameters of pseudo-second-order kinetic equation.
Table 2. Related parameters of pseudo-second-order kinetic equation.
SamplehK2R2
SRHGC-1200.5172.22 × 10−50.99348
SRHGC-1600.5042.15 × 10−50.99623
SRHGC-2000.4752.11 × 10−50.99713
Table 3. Intraparticle diffusion equation-related parameters.
Table 3. Intraparticle diffusion equation-related parameters.
SampleCK1R2
SRHGC-120−15.850885.365380.99063
SRHGC-160−14.698755.239160.99233
SRHGC-200−14.054594.9380.99103
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, R.; Diao, Y.; Liu, H.; Lu, Y. Experimental and Adsorption Kinetics Study of Hg0 Removal from Flue Gas by Silver-Loaded Rice Husk Gasification Char. Coatings 2024, 14, 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14070797

AMA Style

Yang R, Diao Y, Liu H, Lu Y. Experimental and Adsorption Kinetics Study of Hg0 Removal from Flue Gas by Silver-Loaded Rice Husk Gasification Char. Coatings. 2024; 14(7):797. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14070797

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Ru, Yongfa Diao, Hongbin Liu, and Yihang Lu. 2024. "Experimental and Adsorption Kinetics Study of Hg0 Removal from Flue Gas by Silver-Loaded Rice Husk Gasification Char" Coatings 14, no. 7: 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14070797

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop