Conservation and Protection Treatments for Cultural Heritage: Insights and Trends from a Bibliometric Analysis
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Data Collection
2.2. Bibliometric Analysis
2.3. Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) Methodology
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Annual Publications and Document Type
3.2. Countries
3.3. Most Cited Articles
- Cleaning: The use of gels has been widely extended in the field of cultural heritage restoration as they reduce the permeation of solvents used to clean surfaces. However, the utilization of gels presents some difficulties in their removal and may leave residues on the surface of the work of art after the application. In this sense, Carretti et al., 2010 [36] discussed a possible solution to the removal problem of gels in artwork conservation through three types of innovative responsive gels: rheoreversible, magnetic, and “peelable” gels. These gels can be easily and rapidly removed via a response to a “chemical switch” (rheoreversible gels) or an external magnet (gels with embedded magnetic nanoparticles). The novelty and practical applicability of these gels have acquired significant attention in the field as they offer simple solutions to common conservation problems.
- Consolidation: As reported by Giorgi et al. [37] and many other researchers, the consolidation of paintings, stone, paper, and wood frequently involve the use of calcium hydroxide dispersions, ensuring complete compatibility with the original materials. This has been also the focus of the investigation of Dei et Salvadori [38], where limestones and painted surfaces affected by different kinds of decay were consolidated by using nanosized particles of calcium hydroxide dispersed in an alcoholic medium. On the other hand, Bertolino et al. [39] also reviewed works where composites containing halloysite nanotubes were used for the consolidation of paper and wooden artifacts.
- Protection: La Russa et al. [40] developed an organic coating to obtain biocidal and hydrophobic functionalities. The coating was composed of an aqueous dispersion containing an acrylic polymer and anatase TiO2 nanoparticles and was applied to marble and limestone specimens. The results showed great growth inhibition efficiency and good water repellence after the treatments on both lithotypes. Also, Manoudis et al. [41] used common nanoparticles (SiO2, Al2O3, SnO2, and TiO2) and siloxane products to obtain superhydrophobicity functionality on stone surfaces. The results showed that nanoparticles induced superhydrophobicity, but affected the aesthetic appearance of the studied stones.
# | Title | Authors | Year | Source | Type | Cites | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Microclimate for cultural heritage | Camuffo | 1998 | Microclimate for cultural heritage | Book | 288 | [35] |
2 | New frontiers in materials science for art conservation: Responsive gels and beyond | Carretti et al. | 2010 | Accounts of Chemical Research | Article | 202 | [36] |
3 | Use of EIS for the evaluation of the protective properties of coatings for metallic cultural heritage: A review | Cano et al. | 2010 | Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry | Review | 201 | [42] |
4 | Analytical characterization of polymers used in conservation and restoration by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy | Chércoles et al. | 2009 | Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry | Article | 198 | [9] |
5 | Multifunctional TiO2 coatings for Cultural Heritage | La Russa et al. | 2012 | Progress in organic coatings | Article | 190 | [40] |
6 | Polysaccharides/Halloysite nanotubes for smart bionanocomposite materials | Bertolino et al. | 2020 | Carbohydrate Polymers | Review | 170 | [39] |
7 | New Methodologies for the conservation of cultural heritage: Micellar solutions, microemulsions, and hydroxide nanoparticles | Giorgi et al. | 2010 | Accounts of Chemical Research | Article | 156 | [37] |
8 | Nanotechnology in cultural heritage conservation: nanometric slaked lime saves architectonic and artistic surfaces from decay | Dei et Salvadori | 2006 | Journal of Cultural Heritage | Article | 139 | [38] |
9 | New advances in the application of FTIR microscopy and spectroscopy for the characterization of artistic materials | Prati et al. | 2010 | Accounts of Chemical Research | Article | 138 | [43] |
10 | Superhydrophobic films for the protection of outdoor cultural heritage assets | Manoudis et al. | 2009 | Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing | Article | 136 | [41] |
3.4. Journals and Authors
3.5. Keywords
3.6. Research Trends
3.6.1. Non-Invasive Analytical Techniques
3.6.2. Nanotechnology
3.6.3. Green Chemistry/Nature-Based Solutions
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Available online: https://whc.unesco.org/en/convention (accessed on 1 February 2024).
- Baglioni, P.; Chelazzi, D. How Science Can Contribute to the Remedial Conservation of Cultural Heritage. Chem. A Eur. J. 2021, 27, 10798–10806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Available online: https://www.unesco.org (accessed on 1 February 2024).
- Artesani, A.; Di Turo, F.; Zucchelli, M.; Traviglia, A. Recent Advances in Protective Coatings for Cultural. Coatings 2020, 10, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casini, A.; Chelazzi, D.; Baglioni, P. Advanced methodologies for the cleaning of works of art. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2023, 66, 2162–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cappitelli, F.; Cattò, C.; Villa, F. The Control of Cultural Heritage Microbial Deterioration. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sterflinger, K. Fungi: Their role in deterioration of cultural heritage. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2010, 24, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vidović, K.; Hočevar, S.; Menart, E.; Drventić, I.; Grgić, I.; Kroflič, A. Impact of air pollution on outdoor cultural heritage objects and decoding the role of particulate matter: A critical review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 46405–46437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asensio, R.C.; Moya, M.S.A.; de la Roja, J.M.; Gómez, M. Analytical characterization of polymers used in conservation and restoration by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009, 395, 2081–2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- France, F.G. Advanced Spectral Imaging for Noninvasive Microanalysis of Cultural Heritage Materials: Review of Application to Documents in the U.S. Library of Congress. Appl. Spectrosc. 2011, 65, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chelazzi, D.; Baglioni, P. From Nanoparticles to Gels: A Breakthrough in Art Conservation Science. Langmuir 2023, 39, 10744–10755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sierra-Fernandez, A.; Gomez-Villalba, L.S.; Rabanal, M.E.; Fort, R. New nanomaterials for applications in conservation and restoration of stony materials: A review. Mater. Constr. 2017, 67, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanth, A.P.; Soni, A.K. Application of nanocomposites for conservation of materials of cultural heritage. J. Cult. Herit. 2023, 59, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becerra, J.; Zaderenko, A.P.; Gómez-Morón, M.A.; Ortiz, P. Nanoparticles Applied to Stone Buildings. Int. J. Arch. Herit. 2021, 15, 1320–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Salvo, S. Nanotechnology for Cultural Heritage. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2014, 2, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baglioni, P.; Carretti, E.; Chelazzi, D. Nanomaterials in art conservation. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 287–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- David, M.E.; Ion, R.-M.; Grigorescu, R.M.; Iancu, L.; Andrei, E.R. Nanomaterials Used in Conservation and Restoration of Cultural Heritage: An Up-to-Date Overview. Materials 2020, 13, 2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Choudhri, A.F.; Siddiqui, A.; Khan, N.R.; Cohen, H.L. Understanding Bibliometric Parameters and Analysis. RadioGraphics 2015, 35, 736–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bornmann, L. Scientometrics in a changing research landscape. Sci. Soc. 2014, 15, 1228–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Falagas, M.E.; Pitsouni, E.I.; Malietzis, G.A.; Pappas, G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008, 22, 338–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durieux, V.; Gevenois, P.A. Bibliometric indicators: Quality measurements of scientific publication. Radiology 2010, 255, 342–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costas, R.; Bordons, M. The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. J. Inf. 2007, 1, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belter, C.W. Bibliometric indicators: Opportunities and limits. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 2015, 103, 219–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rogers, G.; Szomszor, M.; Adams, J. Sample size in bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 2020, 125, 777–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: https://www.vosviewer.com (accessed on 1 February 2024).
- Kirby, A. Exploratory Bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a Preliminary Research Tool. Publications 2023, 11, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehmood, A.; Zunaid, M.; Madan, A.K. A bibliometric analysis of cold spray coating process using VOSviewer. Mater. Today Proc. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelwahab, S.I.; Taha, M.M.E.; Moni, S.S.; Alsayegh, A.A. Bibliometric mapping of solid lipid nanoparticles research (2012–2022) using VOSviewer. Med. Nov. Technol. Devices 2022, 17, 100217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tamala, J.K.; Maramag, E.I.; Simeon, K.A.; Ignacio, J.J. A bibliometric analysis of sustainable oil and gas production research using VOSviewer. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2022, 7, 100437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, R.K.; Agarwalla, R.; Naik, B.H.; Evuri, J.R.; Thapa, A.; Singh, T.D. Prediction of research trends using LDA based topic modeling. Glob. Transit. Proc. 2022, 3, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.-W.; Gil, J.-M. Research paper classification systems based on TF-IDF and LDA schemes. Hum. Centric Comput. Inf. Sci. 2019, 9, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- George, L.; Sumathy, P. An integrated clustering and BERT framework for improved topic modeling. Int. J. Inf. Technol. 2023, 15, 2187–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: https://www.mapchart.net (accessed on 22 January 2024).
- Reyes-Gonzalez, L.; Gonzalez-Brambila, C.N.; Veloso, F. Using co-authorship and citation analysis to identify research groups: A new way to assess performance. Scientometrics 2016, 108, 1171–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baer, N.S.; Camuffo, D. Microclimate for Cultural Heritage; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Carretti, E.; Bonini, M.; Dei, L.; Berrie, B.H.; Angelova, L.V.; Baglioni, P.; Weiss, R.G. New Frontiers in Materials Science for Art Conservation: Responsive Gels and Beyond. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 751–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Giorgi, R.; Baglioni, M.; Berti, D.; Baglioni, P. New Methodologies for the Conservation of Cultural Heritage: Micellar Solutions, Microemulsions, and Hydroxide Nanoparticles. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 695–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dei, L.; Salvadori, B. Nanotechnology in cultural heritage conservation: Nanometric slaked lime saves architectonic and artistic surfaces from decay. J. Cult. Herit. 2006, 7, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertolino, V.; Cavallaro, G.; Milioto, S.; Lazzara, G. Polysaccharides/Halloysite nanotubes for smart bionanocomposite materials. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 245, 116502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- La Russa, M.F.; Ruffolo, S.A.; Rovella, N.; Belfiore, C.M.; Palermo, A.M.; Guzzi, M.T.; Crisci, G.M. Multifunctional TiO2 coatings for Cultural Heritage. Prog. Org. Coat. 2012, 74, 186–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manoudis, P.N.; Karapanagiotis, I.; Tsakalof, A.; Zuburtikudis, I.; Kolinkeová, B.; Panayiotou, C. Superhydrophobic films for the protection of outdoor cultural heritage assets. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 2009, 97, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cano, E.; Lafuente, D.; Bastidas, D.M. Use of EIS for the evaluation of the protective properties of coatings for metallic cultural heritage: A review. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2009, 14, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prati, S.; Joseph, E.; Sciutto, G.; Mazzeo, R. New Advances in the Application of FTIR Microscopy and Spectroscopy for the Characterization of Artistic Materials. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 792–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bitossi, G.; Giorgi, R.; Mauro, M.; Salvadori, B.; Dei, L. Spectroscopic Techniques in Cultural Heritage Conservation: A Survey. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2005, 40, 187–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casadio, F.; Toniolo, L. The analysis of polychrome works of art: 40 years of infrared spectroscopic investigations. J. Cult. Herit. 2001, 2, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calvo, J.P.; Regueiro, M. Carbonate rocks in the Mediterranean region—From classical to innovative uses of building stone. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spéc. Publ. 2010, 331, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scheerer, S.; Ortega-Morales, O.; Gaylarde, C. Chapter 5 Microbial Deterioration of Stone Monuments—An Updated Overview. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 66, 97–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peccenini, E.; Albertin, F.; Bettuzzi, M.; Brancaccio, R.; Casali, F.; Morigi, M.P.; Petrucci, F. Advanced imaging systems for diagnostic investigations applied to Cultural Heritage. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2014, 566, 012022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radhakrishnan, S.; Erbis, S.; Isaacs, J.A.; Kamarthi, S. Novel keyword co-occurrence network-based methods to foster systematic reviews of scientific literature. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172778. [Google Scholar]
- Boccaccini, F.; Giuliani, C.; Pascucci, M.; Riccucci, C.; Messina, E.; Staccioli, M.P.; Ingo, G.M.; Di Carlo, G. Toward a Green and Sustainable Silver Conservation: Development and Validation of Chitosan-Based Protective Coatings. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Madariaga, J.M. Analytical chemistry in the field of cultural heritage. Anal. Methods 2015, 7, 4848–4876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pehlivan, G.F. Analysis of Cultural Heritage by Non-Destructive Methods: The Case of Sivas Congress Museum. Arch. Urban Plan. 2023, 19, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moropoulou, A.; Labropoulos, K.C.; Delegou, E.T.; Karoglou, M.; Bakolas, A. Non-destructive techniques as a tool for the protection of built cultural heritage. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 48, 1222–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magrini, D.; Bracci, S.; Cantisani, E.; Conti, C.; Rava, A.; Sansonetti, A.; Shank, W.; Colombini, M. A multi-analytical approach for the characterization of wall painting materials on contemporary buildings. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2017, 173, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Musumarra, G.; Fichera, M. Chemometrics and cultural heritage. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998, 44, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riu, J.; Giussani, B. Analytical chemistry meets art: The transformative role of chemometrics in cultural heritage preservation. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2023, 247, 105095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Festa, G.; Romanelli, G.; Senesi, R.; Arcidiacono, L.; Scatigno, C.; Parker, S.F.; Marques, M.P.M.; Andreani, C. Neutrons for Cultural Heritage—Techniques, Sensors, and Detection. Sensors 2020, 20, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ren, Y.; Zuo, X. Synchrotron X-Ray and Neutron Diffraction, Total Scattering, and Small-Angle Scattering Techniques for Rechargeable Battery Research. Small Methods 2018, 2, 1800064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertrand, L.; Robinet, L.; Thoury, M.; Janssens, K.; Cohen, S.X.; Schöder, S. Cultural heritage and archaeology materials studied by synchrotron spectroscopy and imaging. Appl. Phys. A 2012, 106, 377–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franco-Castillo, I.; Hierro, L.; de la Fuente, J.M.; Seral-Ascaso, A.; Mitchell, S.G. Perspectives for antimicrobial nanomaterials in cultural heritage conservation. Chem 2021, 7, 629–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedersoli, J.L., Jr.; Antomarchi, C.; Michalski, S. Guide to Risk Management. 2016, p. 117. Available online: https://www.iccrom.org/it/publication/guide-risk-management (accessed on 27 May 2024).
- Adriaens, A. European actions to promote and coordinate the use of analytical techniques for cultural heritage studies. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2004, 23, 583–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villacorta, J.J.; Del-Val, L.; Martínez, R.D.; Balmori, J.-A.; Magdaleno, Á.; López, G.; Izquierdo, A.; Lorenzana, A.; Basterra, L.-A. Design and Validation of a Scalable, Reconfigurable and Low-Cost Structural Health Monitoring System. Sensors 2021, 21, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garrido, I.; Erazo-Aux, J.; Lagüela, S.; Sfarra, S.; Ibarra-Castanedo, C.; Pivarčiová, E.; Gargiulo, G.; Maldague, X.; Arias, P. Introduction of Deep Learning in Thermographic Monitoring of Cultural Heritage and Improvement by Automatic Thermogram Pre-Processing Algorithms. Sensors 2021, 21, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiorucci, M.; Khoroshiltseva, M.; Pontil, M.; Traviglia, A.; Del Bue, A.; James, S. Machine Learning for Cultural Heritage: A Survey. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2020, 133, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bile, A.; Tari, H.; Grinde, A.; Frasca, F.; Siani, A.M.; Fazio, E. Novel Model Based on Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Short-Term Temperature Evolution in Museum Environment. Sensors 2022, 22, 615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, M.; Lourenço, P.B. Artificial intelligence-assisted visual inspection for cultural heritage: State-of-the-art review. J. Cult. Herit. 2024, 66, 536–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Bari, M. A study for innovation of methodologies and processes in digitisation and digital creation for improving the interaction with the Cultural Heritage. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2024, 237, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murphy, C.; Carew, P.J.; Stapleton, L. Towards a Human-Centred Framework for Smart Digital Immersion and Control for Cultural Heritage Applications. IFAC Pap. 2022, 55, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramtohul, A.; Khedo, K.K. Augmented reality systems in the cultural heritage domains: A systematic review. Digit. Appl. Archaeol. Cult. Herit. 2024, 32, e00317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, L.; Wang, L.; Zhao, X.; Peng, M. Non-whitening superhydrophobic coating for heritage protection. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023, 676, 132294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kapridaki, C.; Maravelaki-Kalaitzaki, P. TiO2–SiO2–PDMS nano-composite hydrophobic coating with self-cleaning properties for marble protection. Prog. Org. Coat. 2013, 76, 400–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crupi, V.; Fazio, B.; Gessini, A.; Kis, Z.; La Russa, M.F.; Majolino, D.; Masciovecchio, C.; Ricca, M.; Rossi, B.; Ruffolo, S.A.; et al. TiO2–SiO2–PDMS nanocomposite coating with self-cleaning effect for stone material: Finding the optimal amount of TiO2. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 166, 464–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graziani, L.; Quagliarini, E.; Osimani, A.; Aquilanti, L.; Clementi, F.; Yéprémian, C.; Lariccia, V.; Amoroso, S.; D’Orazio, M. Evaluation of inhibitory effect of TiO2 nanocoatings against microalgal growth on clay brick façades under weak UV exposure conditions. J. Affect. Disord. 2013, 64, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinho, L.; Elhaddad, F.; Facio, D.S.; Mosquera, M.J. A novel TiO2–SiO2 nanocomposite converts a very friable stone into a self-cleaning building material. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 275, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornari, A.; Rossi, M.; Rocco, D.; Mattiello, L. A Review of Applications of Nanocellulose to Preserve and Protect Cultural Heritage Wood, Paintings, and Historical Papers. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 12846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotsidi, M.; Gorgolis, G.; Carbone, M.-G.P.; Anagnostopoulos, G.; Paterakis, G.; Poggi, G.; Baglioni, P.; Galiotis, C. Graphene as effective anti-fading agent for the protection of artworks. Inven. Discl. 2022, 2, 100005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galvagno, E.; Tartaglia, E.; Stratigaki, M.; Tossi, C.; Marasco, L.; Menegazzo, F.; Zanardi, C.; Omenetto, F.; Coletti, C.; Traviglia, A.; et al. Present Status and Perspectives of Graphene and Graphene-related Materials in Cultural Heritage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2313043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotsidi, M.; Gorgolis, G.; Carbone, M.G.P.; Anagnostopoulos, G.; Paterakis, G.; Poggi, G.; Manikas, A.; Trakakis, G.; Baglioni, P.; Galiotis, C. Preventing colour fading in artworks with graphene veils. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2021, 16, 1004–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kotsidi, M.; Gorgolis, G.; Carbone, M.G.P.; Paterakis, G.; Anagnostopoulos, G.; Trakakis, G.; Manikas, A.C.; Pavlou, C.; Koutroumanis, N.; Galiotis, C. Graphene nanoplatelets and other 2D-materials as protective means against the fading of coloured inks, dyes and paints. Nanoscale 2023, 15, 5414–5428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Casorri, L.; Masciarelli, E.; Ficociello, B.; Ietto, F.; Incoronato, F.; Di Luigi, M.; Beni, C.; Pacioni, G. Natural substances as biocides in the fungi treatment on artistic products to protect the environment and health of restoration workers. Ital. J. Mycol. 2023, 52, 89–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macchia, A.; Strangis, R.; De Angelis, S.; Cersosimo, M.; Docci, A.; Ricca, M.; Gabriele, B.; Mancuso, R.; La Russa, M.F. Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs): Preliminary Results for Their Use Such as Biocides in the Building Cultural Heritage. Materials 2022, 15, 4005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zimmerman, J.B.; Anastas, P.T.; Erythropel, H.C.; Leitner, W. Designing for a green chemistry future. Science 2020, 367, 397–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marco, A.; Santos, S.; Caetano, J.; Pintado, M.; Vieira, E.; Moreira, P.R. Basil essential oil as an alternative to commercial biocides against fungi associated with black stains in mural painting. J. Affect. Disord. 2020, 167, 106459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandelli, D.; Mastrangelo, R.; Poggi, G.; Chelazzi, D.; Baglioni, P. New sustainable polymers and oligomers for Cultural Heritage conservation. Chem. Sci. 2024, 15, 2443–2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ocak, Y.; Sofuoglu, A.; Tihminlioglu, F.; Böke, H. Protection of marble surfaces by using biodegradable polymers as coating agent. Prog. Org. Coat. 2009, 66, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balliana, E.; Ricci, G.; Pesce, C.; Zendri, E. Assessing the value of green conservation for cultural heritage: Positive and critical aspects of already available methodologies. Int. J. Conserv. Sci. 2016, 7, 185–202. [Google Scholar]
- Ortega-Morales, B.O.; Gaylarde, C.C. Bioconservation of Historic Stone Buildings—An Updated Review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Osch, D.J.G.P.; Dietz, C.H.J.T.; Warrag, S.E.E.; Kroon, M.C. The Curious Case of Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Solvents: A Story on the Discovery, Design, and Applications. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 10591–10612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbar, N.; Khan, N.A.; Ibrahim, T.; Khamis, M.; Khan, A.S.; Alharbi, A.M.; Alfahemi, H.; Siddiqui, R. Antimicrobial Activity of Novel Deep Eutectic Solvents. Sci. Pharm. 2023, 91, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juneidi, I.; Hayyan, M.; Ali, O.M. Toxicity profile of choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvents for fungi and Cyprinus carpio fish. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 7648–7659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fidanza, M.R.; Caneva, G. Natural biocides for the conservation of stone cultural heritage: A review. J. Cult. Herit. 2019, 38, 271–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russo, R.; Palla, F. Plant Essential Oils as Biocides in Sustainable Strategies for the conservation of cultural heritage. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashraf, M.A.; Ullah, S.; Ahmad, I.; Qureshi, A.K.; Balkhair, K.S.; Rehman, M.A. Green biocides, a promising technology: Current and future applications to industry and industrial processes. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 388–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Journal | Documents | Citations | JCR Impact Factor (2022) |
---|---|---|---|
Journal of Cultural Heritage | 80 | 1631 | 3.1 |
Studies in Conservation | 37 | 159 | 0.8 |
Coatings | 34 | 337 | 3.4 |
Progress in Organic Coatings | 28 | 867 | 6.6 |
Heritage Science | 22 | 402 | 2.5 |
Heritage | 19 | 71 | 1.7 |
Radiation Physics and Chemistry | 19 | 250 | 2.9 |
Applied Sciences (Switzerland) | 18 | 201 | 2.7 |
Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing | 17 | 592 | 2.7 |
International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation | 17 | 686 | 4.8 |
Author | Country | Affiliation | Documents | Citations | H Index | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Baglioni, P. | Italy | Università degli Studi di Firenze | 29 | 1022 | 64 |
2 | La Russa, M.F. | Italy | Università della Calabria | 18 | 575 | 32 |
3 | Grassini, S. | Italy | Politecnico di Torino | 15 | 115 | 24 |
4 | Karapanagiotis, I. | Greece | Aristotle University of Thessaloniki | 15 | 653 | 33 |
5 | Sassoni, E. | Italy | Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna | 15 | 438 | 27 |
6 | Chelazzi, D. | Italy | Università degli Studi di Firenze | 14 | 261 | 34 |
7 | Giorgi, R. | Italy | Università degli Studi di Firenze | 14 | 570 | 35 |
8 | Angelini, E. | Italy | Politecnico di Torino | 12 | 138 | 35 |
9 | Franzoni, E. | Italy | Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna | 12 | 396 | 33 |
10 | Ruffolo, S.A. | Italy | Università della Calabria | 12 | 569 | 30 |
Group Number | Top Ten Words That Define Each Topic | Assigned Topic Name by GPT4 Model | Number of Articles Where Topic Score Is > 0.1 |
---|---|---|---|
0 | conservation, heritage, cultural, material, treatment, paper, study, method, used, restoration | Cultural Conservation and Restoration | 965 |
1 | stone, coating, surface, water, treatment, heritage, material, cultural, based, property | Stone Conservation and Surface Treatment | 625 |
2 | heritage, cultural, film, preservation, building, research, value, urban, treatment, conservation | Urban Heritage and Cultural Preservation | 439 |
3 | corrosion, wood, silver, coating, electrochemical, iron, sample, treatment, spectroscopy, metallic | Corrosion Protection and Material Conservation | 223 |
4 | image, model, digital, data, painting, lacquer, imaging, information, virtual, technique | Digital Imaging and Modelling Techniques | 104 |
5 | fungal, fungi, bacteria, bacterial, strain, film, specie, cinematographic, gelatin, aspergillus | Microbial Biodeterioration and Conservation | 26 |
6 | plant, ecosystem, soil, service, wetland, medicine, wastewater, masseur, knowledge, local | Eco-Environmental Studies | 21 |
7 | temple, hong, coppice, bronze, worn, coat, sucrose, tabia, eicp, phou | Historical Artifacts and Materials | 6 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pérez-Gandarillas, L.; Manteca, C.; Yedra, Á.; Casas, A. Conservation and Protection Treatments for Cultural Heritage: Insights and Trends from a Bibliometric Analysis. Coatings 2024, 14, 1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14081027
Pérez-Gandarillas L, Manteca C, Yedra Á, Casas A. Conservation and Protection Treatments for Cultural Heritage: Insights and Trends from a Bibliometric Analysis. Coatings. 2024; 14(8):1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14081027
Chicago/Turabian StylePérez-Gandarillas, Lucía, Carmen Manteca, Ángel Yedra, and Abraham Casas. 2024. "Conservation and Protection Treatments for Cultural Heritage: Insights and Trends from a Bibliometric Analysis" Coatings 14, no. 8: 1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14081027