Next Article in Journal
Toughness Reinforcement Design of Grouting Materials for Semi-Flexible Pavements Through Water-Based Epoxy Resin and Emulsified Asphalt
Previous Article in Journal
An Improved Fabrication Method for Van Der Pauw Mobility Measurement on GaN Epitaxy on Conductive and Non-Conductive Substrates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Urban Regeneration with Wind and Thermal Environment Optimization: Design Roadshow of a Historic Town in China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

First Identification of a Gypsum-Based Preparatory Layer on Polychrome Wooden Figurines from the Mawangdui Han Tomb No. 1 (2nd Century BCE), Changsha, China

by
Ningning Xu
1,2,3,
Tingyan Ren
2,3,
Pan Xiao
2,3 and
Qi Liu
2,3,4,*
1
Yuelu Academy, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
2
Hunan Museum, The Cultural Relics Appraisal Center of Hunan Province, Changsha 410008, China
3
Hunan Key Laboratory of Archaeometry and Conservation Science, Changsha 410008, China
4
The National Museum of Asian Art, Washington, DC 20004, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2025, 15(4), 492; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15040492
Submission received: 31 March 2025 / Revised: 16 April 2025 / Accepted: 17 April 2025 / Published: 21 April 2025

Abstract

:
This study presents the first scientific characterization of the white preparatory layer and polychrome pigments on painted wooden figurines excavated from the Mawangdui Tomb No. 1, dating to the Han dynasty. A combination of analytical techniques, including XRF mapping, SEM, ATR-FTIR, XRD, and Raman spectroscopy, was used to investigate the composition, structure, and potential additives in the white layer. The results reveal that the preparatory layer is primarily composed of gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O) and calcite (CaCO3), with minor phases such as anhydrite and larnite. SEM observations show a porous microstructure of needle-like crystals, while spectroscopic data suggest possible traces of organic binders. The preparatory layer was likely applied to smooth surface irregularities and support polychrome decoration, such as cinnabar and carbon-based pigments, and may have also functioned as a putty in localized areas. This represents the first confirmed use of gypsum-based plaster in ancient Chinese woodcarving, showing unexpected parallels with surface preparation techniques used in New Kingdom Egypt. However, the presence of organic additives and the internal structure of the figurines remain unresolved due to equipment limitations. These findings provide new insights into ancient material practices and highlight the importance of environmental control and material-specific conservation strategies for fragile gypsum-based heritage objects.

1. Introduction

Polychrome painting has long served as a vital decorative technique in ancient art, applied across a wide range of materials, including pottery, stone, wood, murals, and bronzes [1,2,3]. Over the past three decades, scientific investigations into polychrome surfaces in Chinese cultural heritage, particularly those dating from the Warring States period (475 BCE to 221 BCE) to the Han dynasty (202 BCE to 220 CE), have significantly enhanced our understanding of ancient pigments, painting materials, and artistic practices. However, painted wooden artifacts, which constitute an important category within this domain, are rarely preserved in a complete state. This is primarily due to the degradation of cellulose in archaeological wood over time, which results in severe structural weakening. Additionally, unstable environmental conditions during excavation and storage, including fluctuations in temperature and humidity, frequently cause drying, cracking, warping, and surface damage. These factors often lead to the detachment of polychrome paint layers, which poses serious challenges to the study of original materials and the reconstruction of historical production techniques. While considerable research has focused on pigment identification, such as cinnabar, minium, azurite, malachite, Han blue, and carbon black [4,5,6], studies on the detailed painting processes remain relatively limited, particularly in relation to the preparation of underlayers and the techniques used in wood carving and surface modeling.
Among wooden artifacts, funerary figurines hold particular significance because they were specifically created to accompany the deceased in burials. Archaeological evidence suggests that such wooden figures originated in the Chu state, a major state in southern China during the Warring States period, and have been primarily unearthed from tombs in Hunan, Hubei, Anhui, and Jiangsu provinces, dating from the Warring States to the Han dynasty [7,8,9]. Since these figurines were interred immediately after production and not subjected to daily use, many retain intricate carving and polychrome decoration in a relatively original condition. Such wooden figurines vary in size and form; they display a wide range of decorative techniques, including carving, surface modeling, polychrome painting, and simulated clothing. These finely crafted objects provide valuable insights into the social customs, costume styles, and technological practices of early imperial China.
A large number of wooden human figurines have been excavated from tombs in the Changsha region, ranging in height from a few centimeters to life-size [10,11,12]. Typically, these figurines were carved from whole blocks of wood to form the basic shape. The surfaces were further refined through techniques including direct polychrome painting, the addition of separate elements, and the application of miniature garments. Facial features and clothing details such as sleeves and collars were often modeled with precision to enhance lifelike expression. Based on their posture and attributes, these figurines have been systematically classified into categories such as attendants, musicians, craftsmen, guards, dancers, and stewards. They reflect the social status of the tomb owner and represent a belief system in which idealized servants continue to assist the deceased in the afterlife.
Notably, standing figurines from Wulipai Tomb M406 and the Mawangdui (MWD) Han Tombs Nos. 1 and 3 were entirely coated with a white preparatory layer (putty layer) prior to the application of polychrome paint. This treatment created a distinctive appearance characterized by white faces and white bodies [13]. Similar white preparatory layers have also been observed in other funerary objects, such as mica-coated wooden bi disks from the MWD Tomb No. 1 [14], wooden horse-shaped figurines from a Han tomb in Mozuizi, Wuwei, Gansu [15], and terracotta figurines from royal Han dynasty tombs in Qingzhou County, Shandong [1]. These cases suggest that the use of white ground layers was a common practice in early imperial mortuary art. However, across all these examples, the material composition, preparation techniques, and functional roles of the white layers remain poorly understood due to the lack of systematic scientific investigation.
During routine conservation of the MWD figurines, we conducted a comprehensive scientific analysis to characterize the white preparatory layer and overlying pigments. Using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) imaging, SEM, Raman spectroscopy, ATR-FTIR, and XRD, this study aims to clarify the material composition and application techniques of the preparatory layer and contribute to future conservation strategies and technical understanding of early Chinese polychrome woodcraft.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Description of the Wooden Figurines and Sampling Strategy

A total of 162 wooden attendant figurines (站立侍从俑) were recovered from the side chambers during the 1972 excavation of the Mawangdui Tomb No. 1 (马王堆一号汉墓) in Changsha. Among them, 101 polychrome standing figures from the eastern and southern chambers are particularly notable (Figure 1). These were found in a semi-upright or fallen state, with some partially submerged in approximately 40 cm of stagnant water at the bottom of the chambers. Associated burial objects included bamboo-woven containers filled with silk fabrics, along with terracotta items, pottery, and lacquerware.
The standing figures typically measure 42 to 51 cm in height, with head lengths of 7 to 8 cm and shoulder widths of approximately 13 cm. They were most likely carved from single blocks of wood, as there is no evidence of jointed or assembled components. A uniform white preparatory layer also referred to as a preparatory layer, was applied across the surface. Red and black pigments were used to render facial features, while the garments were decorated with additional patterns in red, black, and dark green. The figures wear cross-collar long robes with flat necklines, and their arms hang naturally, with hands enclosed within the sleeves at the abdomen. At the time of excavation, most figurines retained vivid coloration and appeared relatively well preserved. However, extended storage and environmental fluctuations have resulted in significant deterioration, including fading, dehydration, warping, cracking, and the delamination of painted layers.
One figurine, in particular (ID: 5035), exhibited extensive damage, with severe cracking visible on the face and throughout the body (Figure 2), especially in the lower half. In this area, both the painted layer and its underlying preparatory layer had detached from the wooden substrate. The detached fragment measures approximately 56 mm in length, with a maximum width of 28 mm and a thickness of 16 mm at its base (Figure 3). The front surface is decorated with red and black pigments, while the reverse shows the impression of the underlying wood. The fragment consists entirely of a gray–white solid material, with no visible traces of wood or other fillers. Based on its morphology and detachment characteristics, it is inferred that the wooden substrate had surface irregularities that were compensated by a thick application of preparatory, which served to fill defects prior to painting. Small samples of the preparatory and pigment layers from this fragment were collected for scientific analysis.

2.2. Elemental Mapping by MA-XRF and µXRF

In the investigation of the painted surface and an underlying preparatory layer of these wooden figurines, XRF mapping has proven to be an indispensable analytical method. This non-invasive technique enables in situ acquisition of elemental distribution maps across the entire surface rather than limited point measurements. It generates detailed visualizations of elemental concentrations, which reveal potential hidden structural features, clarify the spatial arrangement of pigments, and help distinguish between the chemical compositions of the painted layer and the underlying substrate. XRF is particularly effective for detecting complex pigment layering and subtle material transitions. Its relatively fast scanning speed and portability make it especially suitable for on-site heritage analysis [16,17,18].
Elemental mapping of the sample was carried out using two complementary XRF systems: the Bruker CRONO macro-X-ray fluorescence (MA-XRF) scanner and the Bruker M4 micro-X-ray fluorescence (µXRF) scanner. The MA-XRF system was employed for rapid, large-area scanning of the outer surface of the detached fragment [19]. It operated at 50 kV and 200 µA, achieving a spatial resolution of 0.5 mm and an energy resolution below 140 eV (Mn Kα). In contrast, the µXRF system [20] was used for high-resolution mapping of a selected area on the lower front side of figurine 5035. It operated at the same voltage but at a higher current of 600 µA, achieving a spatial resolution of 30 µm and an energy resolution below 145 eV. The µXRF scanning covered an area of 34.9 × 30.5 mm in this study. Together, these two systems provided a complementary analytical approach, combining rapid overview mapping with detailed analysis of localized elemental distributions. This dual-system strategy enabled both the identification of general compositional patterns and the detection of fine-scale material variations across different regions of the figurine.

2.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) for Microstructural Observation

The microstructure of the gray–white material from the inner surface of the preparatory layer was examined using a JEOL JCM-6000Plus (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) scanning electron microscope. Prior to imaging, the sample was coated with a thin layer of gold under vacuum conditions using a sputter coater in order to enhance conductivity and minimize surface charging. The SEM system was operated at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV, with a working distance between 7 and 53 mm. The filament current and probe current were maintained at standard settings. These parameters ensured optimal resolution and contrast in the acquired images. The analysis focused on identifying crystal morphology, porosity, and surface features of the preparatory material.

2.4. ATR-FTIR Analysis

ATR-FTIR analysis was conducted using a Bruker ALPHA Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (Bruker Optik GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) to identify the organic and inorganic components of the gray–white solid material from the preparatory layer. The sample was ground into a fine powder prior to analysis. An A220/D-01HP Platinum-ATR Universal sampling module (Bruker Optik GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) was used, with a scanning range of 4000 to 400 cm−1 and a spectral resolution of 4 cm−1. Both background and sample spectra were acquired with 32 scans per measurement. The analysis was performed at room temperature and under normal atmospheric pressure in the cultural heritage conservation laboratory of the Hunan Museum.
For data processing, Python-based libraries were employed (Python 3.9). Matplotlib (version 3.5.1) was used to visualize the spectra, while Pandas handled data management. Numerical calculations were conducted using NumPy, and SciPy was used for spectral post-processing, including smoothing (Savitzky-Golay filter), peak detection (find_peaks), baseline correction (polyfit), and spectral fitting (curve_fit) to enhance the resolution and facilitate identification of weak absorption bands.

2.5. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

The phase composition of the gray–white solid material from the preparatory layer was analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD) with a Bruker D8 Advance Eco diffractometer (Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany). Prior to testing, the sample was finely ground and uniformly spread onto a monocrystalline silicon substrate. The instrument was equipped with a ceramic X-ray tube using a copper anode (Cu Kα1, λ = 1.54060 Å), operated at 40 kV and 25 mA. The detector was configured in SSD160 one-dimensional mode with a divergence slit of 0.6 mm and a scatter slit of 2.5°. Data acquisition was performed over a 2θ range of 10° to 90°, with a step size of 0.008° and a counting time of 0.06 s per step. Phase identification was carried out using Jade software (version 6.0, Materials Data, Inc., Livermore, CA, USA).
Further analysis of the XRD data was conducted through Whole Pattern Fitting (WPF) and Rietveld Refinement. The peak shape function was modeled using the Pearson VII function with a fixed background. The refinement process converged after 26 iterations, yielding an R-factor of 19.05 percent, with E = 11.88 percent, R/E = 1.6, P = 38, and EPS = 0.5. These results ensured accurate phase quantification and structural refinement of the sample.

2.6. Raman Spectroscopy

Raman spectroscopy was used to analyze the red and black pigments applied to the figurine, as well as the gray–white solid material from the preparatory layer. The measurements were performed using a Bruker SENTERRA II confocal microscopic Raman spectrometer (Bruker Optik GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany), which incorporates a confocal optical system that enables high spatial resolution and depth discrimination. An integrated Olympus microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was used for sample observation and precise laser focusing on targeted micro-regions, thereby minimizing interference from surrounding areas. All measurements were carried out at room temperature and under normal atmospheric pressure in the cultural heritage conservation laboratory of the Hunan Museum.
A 785 nm laser was used as the excitation source, with the laser power set to 1 mW to reduce fluorescence background and avoid thermal damage to the samples. The lateral spatial resolution was below 1 micrometer. Raman spectra were collected over the range of 50 to 3640 cm−1, with a spectral resolution of approximately 4 cm−1. Real-time calibration was performed using SureCAL™ technology (Bruker Optik GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) to ensure both spectral accuracy and reproducibility. Exposure time and the number of accumulations were optimized to achieve an appropriate signal-to-noise ratio. Python-based data processing was employed for spectral visualization and peak annotation. The pandas and matplotlib libraries were used to import, organize, and plot the Raman data, allowing for clear identification of characteristic peaks.

3. Results

3.1. Microstructural Features

SEM observations reveal that the grayish–white substance consists of densely packed needle-like crystals, typically measuring 10–25 µm in length and 1–3 µm in width, accompanied by numerous finer crystals with dimensions below 3 µm. Although partial interlocking between some needle-like crystals is observed, the overall microstructure remains highly porous, with large voids and an uneven pore distribution. The crystals exhibit a random orientation, lacking a clear preferential direction, which contributes to a disordered aggregation.
In addition, film-like material was observed coating the surfaces of some needle-like crystals. These materials appear predominantly as thin films or fibrous structures, creating rough interfaces. The presence of this structureless phase appears to inhibit the growth of well-defined gypsum crystals, resulting in incomplete development and the formation of granular or aggregated morphologies with poorly defined boundaries. In some regions, a limited number of plate-like crystals were found embedded within the film-like matrix, further disrupting regular crystal growth (Figure 4).

3.2. Elemental Distribution and Material Zoning

Two XRF mapping systems were employed to analyze the spatial distribution of elements across the sample. Despite differences in resolution and scanning scale, both systems yielded consistent results regarding the distribution of key elements, including calcium (Ca), sulfur (S), silicon (Si), potassium (K), iron (Fe), and mercury (Hg). These elemental patterns correlate well with the optical image, particularly in relation to color variation across different regions (Figure 5 and Figure 6).
(1)
Calcium is widely distributed in the basal areas of the sample, showing a strong correlation with the gray–white regions observed in the optical image. This suggests that these areas are composed of Ca-rich materials. Silicon exhibits a similarly broad distribution, further supporting its role as a major component of the substrate. The µXRF system offers enhanced clarity, revealing minor variations in Ca and Si concentrations that are not readily apparent in the MA-XRF data.
(2)
Sulfur shows a distribution pattern closely aligned with that of calcium, although some regions exhibit strong Ca signals with weaker S signals. This suggests the presence of multiple Ca-bearing phases, with sulfur associated only with specific ones. The µXRF data provide finer detail, clearly illustrating small-scale heterogeneity in sulfur distribution and depletion.
(3)
The distribution relationship between Si and K is also noteworthy. Both elements show localized co-enrichment in certain areas, which may indicate the presence of a mixed Si-K-bearing phase. However, potassium is more sporadically distributed, suggesting that it exists in relatively minor amounts or is associated with surface deposits. In contrast, the broader and more consistent presence of silicon across the mapped area implies that Si may also exist in the form of a separate Si-rich phase independent of potassium. This interpretation is supported by the µXRF results, which revealed significantly lower concentrations of K than Si in most areas.
(4)
Iron is mainly concentrated in the dark-colored decorative motifs seen in the optical image but is also scattered across the entire sample surface. This implies that iron may be associated with black pigments as well as being a minor component of the underlying substrate.
(5)
Mercury appears as highly concentrated patches that precisely align with red motifs in the optical image. The sharply defined signal boundaries suggest that mercury was deliberately applied through painting rather than being naturally present in the substrate. In areas rich in Hg, the signals of Ca, S, and Si are significantly attenuated. This attenuation is likely due to the high atomic number of Hg, which can block or absorb X-ray fluorescence from underlying layers [21]. The µXRF system, due to its higher resolution, provides a more detailed view of this shielding effect, including areas where Ca and S signals are only partially reduced rather than completely suppressed.
In summary, the MA-XRF system is effective for rapid large-area mapping and provides an overall view of elemental distributions, which helps reveal indications of stratigraphic layering, suggesting a complex interplay between pigments and the underlying material. However, its relatively lower spatial resolution limits the detection of fine material transitions. The µXRF system complements this by offering high-resolution imaging of localized regions, enabling more detailed analysis of pigment application, material heterogeneity, and potential post-depositional alterations.

3.3. Mineralogical Composition and Spectroscopy Studies

3.3.1. XRD Phase Analysis

X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis (Figure 7) identified gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O) as the dominant crystalline phase, accounting for 58.31 wt% of the total composition. Its characteristic peaks appeared at 11.72°, 20.81°, and 29.19° 2θ (PDF#00-033-0311). The full width at half maximum (FWHM) values at 11.72° and 20.81° were 0.1117 and 0.1366, corresponding to crystallite sizes of approximately 715.7 nm and 591.7 nm, indicating a well-developed crystalline structure. Anhydrite (CaSO4, 1.9 wt%) was also detected (PDF#01-086-2270), with a broader peak at 29.19° (FWHM = 0.4674, crystallite size ~175.8 nm), suggesting smaller grains or higher microstrain. The overlap at 29.19° indicates contributions from both gypsum and anhydrite (Figure S1). Additional mineral phases identified include larnite (Ca2SiO4, 2.19 wt%) (PDF#00-033-0302), calcite (CaCO3, 32.5 wt%) (PDF#00-005-0586), and quartz (SiO2, 5.1 wt%) (PDF#03-065-0466), with diffraction peaks consistent with their respective reference patterns. The reported weight percentages are based on full-pattern Rietveld refinement, which produced a good fit between the experimental and calculated diffraction profiles. These results provide a reliable estimate of the relative phase composition of the analyzed material. Although Rietveld refinement does not yield absolute concentration values, it is widely recognized for providing accurate and reproducible semi-quantitative results in multi-phase systems when appropriate structural models and refinement parameters are applied.

3.3.2. ATR-FTIR and Raman Characteristics

ATR-FTIR analysis further confirmed the presence of gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O) in the examined samples [22]. The O–H stretching vibrations of structural water were observed as strong and broad absorption bands centered at 3523 cm−1 and 3393 cm−1. A narrow and intense band at 1619 cm−1 was assigned to the H2O bending vibration (ν2), while a weaker band at 1684 cm−1 may also contribute to this vibrational mode. The sulfate group was identified by several diagnostic bands. The most intense absorption occurred at 1115 cm−1, assigned to the asymmetric stretching vibration (ν3) of SO42−. A weaker band at 1009 cm−1 corresponds to the symmetric stretching mode (ν1). Although this mode is typically Raman-active and IR-inactive under ideal Td symmetry, its presence here may reflect a slight symmetry distortion of the sulfate group, possibly due to hydrogen bonding or lattice effects [23]. Strong signals at 670 cm−1 and 599 cm−1 represent bending vibrations (ν4). Additionally, skeletal lattice vibrations such as Ca–O modes were observed near 460 cm−1. These spectral features collectively confirm the presence of crystallized gypsum [24,25].
Absorptions at 1445 cm−1 and 876 cm−1 were attributed to the asymmetric stretching (ν3) and out-of-plane bending (ν2) modes of CO32−, indicating the presence of carbonate impurities, likely from calcite [26]. The spectral profile thus reflects a gypsum-dominated composition with a minor contribution from carbonate phases (Figure 8a). Since ATR-FTIR averages signals over the contact area, the data represent the bulk composition rather than localized surface variation.
In addition to the inorganic phases, weak absorption bands at 1740 cm−1 and 1241 cm−1 suggest the possible presence of organic components (Figure 8b). The 1740 cm−1 band is likely due to C=O stretching vibrations, commonly found in esters, carboxylic acids, ketones, or aldehydes. These signals may originate from the oxidative degradation of proteinaceous binders such as animal glue, lipid or resin residues, or from the adsorption of environmental contaminants [27,28,29].
The weak signal at 1241 cm−1 may correspond to the Amide III band. However, the characteristic Amide I (~1650 cm−1) and Amide II (~1550 cm−1) bands were not distinctly detected. This absence may result from the extremely low concentration of proteinaceous material (likely below 1 percent), leading to absorption signals below the noise threshold. Furthermore, overlapping signals from H2O bending (1680–1620 cm−1) and CO32− stretching at 1445 cm−1 may obscure Amide I and Amide II, respectively.
Notably, no CH3 or CH2 stretching vibrations were observed in the 2800–3000 cm−1 range, suggesting the absence or only trace amounts of long-chain organic compounds. This further supports the hypothesis that the detected C=O signal may be attributed to degradation byproducts or surface contamination. The uneven distribution of organic residues may also lead to selective detection of certain peaks, thereby limiting the completeness of the spectral information.
Raman spectra indicate that the sample contains both sulfate (SO42−) and carbonate (CO32−) components. The symmetric stretching vibration of SO42−1) is observed at 1008 or 1015 cm−1, corresponding to gypsum and bassanite, respectively. Symmetric bending modes (ν2) are found at 415 cm−1 for gypsum and at 427 and 485 cm−1 for bassanite, reflecting structural differences due to the hydration state. The simultaneous presence of these features may indicate a mixture of both phases [30,31]. Additionally, a symmetric stretching band of CO32− appears at 1085 cm−1, indicating the presence of calcium carbonate, likely in the form of calcite. A weak, broadband in the range of 3200 to 3500 cm−1 corresponds to O–H stretching vibrations, suggesting hydrated sulfate phases such as gypsum (Figure 9a). Based on these features, the predominant phases in the sample are inferred to include gypsum, anhydrite, and minor calcite (Figure S2).
An additional set of Raman peaks is observed between 1200 and 1800 cm−1, beyond the expected SO42− region. Strong bands at 1260, 1358, 1443, and 1573 cm−1, as well as weaker bands at 1674, 1762, and 1875 cm−1 (Figure 9b), resemble Raman signatures associated with organic macromolecules such as proteins, collagen, elastin, nucleic acids, or their degradation products [32,33]. Specifically, the band at 1260 cm−1 may correspond to Amide III (C–H deformation), the 1445 cm−1 band to CH2/CH3 bending, the 1660–1670 cm−1 band to Amide I (C=O stretching), and the 1760 cm−1 band to additional C=O vibrations.
However, the absence of C–C stretching bands in the 800 to 940 cm−1 range and protein cross-linking signals between 1100 and 1300 cm−1 suggests that possible organic compounds may have undergone degradation. Similar spectral patterns have been reported in studies of fossilized bone, where peaks in this region were interpreted as resulting from altered carbonate minerals, secondary mineralization, or degraded biomolecular residues [34]. Raman analyses of plaster materials have also revealed comparable enhanced signals in this range. These signals have been tentatively attributed to structural impurities, including foreign anions, lattice substitutions, or vacancy defects, rather than to residual organic matter [35]. In the present study, the observed spectral features may be explained by the presence of degraded proteinaceous compounds, trace organics, or an increased degree of poorly crystalline disorder within the sulfate matrix.
The painted layer contains fine black particles. Raman spectral analysis reveals a D band between 1300 and 1400 cm−1 and a G band near 1580 to 1620 cm−1, which are characteristic features of disordered carbonaceous materials (Figure 10a). The G band corresponds to the E2g vibrational mode of graphitic carbon, while the D band is associated with lattice defects, edge effects, and structural disorder. The broad profile of the G band and the prominent intensity of the D1 band (1300 to 1385 cm−1) indicate a high degree of structural disorder. In addition, a weak band in the 1200 to 1290 cm−1 range may correspond to the D4 band, which is commonly attributed to sp2–sp3 carbon hybridization, oxidized carbon precursors, or other structural irregularities. These spectral features suggest that the black pigment consists primarily of soot or highly disordered carbon black [36].
Red particles identified within the painted layer exhibit Raman signatures consistent with cinnabar (HgS). A strong band at 253 cm−1 corresponds to the A1 symmetric stretching vibration of the Hg–S bond. Additional peaks at 290 cm−1 and 343 cm−1 are attributed to E-mode shear vibrations and A1 bending modes, respectively (Figure 10b). Some red–black grains display Raman peaks at 226, 293, 410, 498, and 610 cm−1, which match the characteristic bands of hematite (α-Fe2O3) [37]. A weak band at 659 cm−1 may indicate the presence of magnetite (Fe3O4) (Figure 10c), although potential interference from fluorescence cannot be ruled out [38].

4. Discussion

4.1. Technological Interpretation of the Preparatory Material

XRF mapping results indicate that calcium is the most abundant element in the analyzed sample, showing strong and widespread signals across the basal regions. This elemental distribution is closely associated with the gray–white areas observed in the optical image, suggesting that calcium-rich compounds constitute the dominant component of the underlying material. Further characterization by Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction (XRD) confirmed that the main crystalline phases are gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O) and calcite (CaCO3). SEM imaging reveals that the gypsum crystals display a needle-like morphology with a broad size distribution and random orientation. Crystallographic analysis shows that the gypsum crystals predominantly grow along the C-axis, with the {010} plane typically exposed on the crystal sides. The {120} plane is less developed, and the {001} plane is difficult to identify in SEM observations. As a result of this growth pattern and the irregular crystal alignment, the material exhibits a relatively loose and porous microstructure. These features closely resemble those observed in low-strength plaster formulations, particularly gypsum plaster produced through the hydration of thermally processed gypsum [39].
Gypsum plaster is typically prepared by calcining natural gypsum at temperatures between 130 and 160 °C to produce bassanite (CaSO4·½H2O), which rehydrates upon mixing with water to form gypsum again. When hydrated under a low water-to-plaster ratio, the material forms a highly porous matrix of interlocking needle-like crystals with limited strength. This results in low compressive and flexural resistance, making the material fragile and susceptible to mechanical damage.
Based on its microstructural features and phase composition, the grayish–white material constituting the preparatory layer in this study is best interpreted as gypsum plaster that has undergone thermal processing. XRD analysis confirmed minor amounts of anhydrite (CaSO4) and larnite (Ca2SiO4), both of which are known to form under high-temperature conditions. Larnite formation typically occurs in systems containing silicates, sulfates, and calcium oxide at temperatures between 900 and 1100 °C, although it is theoretically possible that some larnite may originate as a natural contaminant, particularly in silicate-rich metamorphic deposits [40]. While anhydrite may begin to form at temperatures as low as 400 °C. Excessive calcination above 1100 °C can lead to the decomposition of calcium sulfate, resulting in irreversible loss of hydration capacity [41,42].
The presence of both bassanite-derived gypsum and high-temperature phases suggests that the material may have experienced non-uniform calcination during ancient gypsum processing. In enclosed kiln-like environments, even when using wood or charcoal as fuel, it is plausible that localized thermal hotspots, albeit extremely limited in extent, could have reached temperatures as high as 1100 °C. Under such conditions, these localized hotspots may have facilitated the formation of anhydrite and even larnite while much of the material remained within the optimal temperature range for bassanite formation. This scenario would have allowed the preparatory layer to maintain its functionality as a workable gypsum-based material used for surface smoothing and support beneath the painted decoration.
XRD and Raman data also reveal calcite intermingled with the gypsum phase. In evaporitic gypsum deposits, calcite frequently coexists with gypsum, anhydrite, and dolomite, forming complex mineral assemblages shaped by depositional processes, water–rock interactions, and diagenetic or microbial activity [43,44]. The carbonate phases observed here may represent natural impurities introduced during raw material sourcing. Alternatively, the partial decomposition of gypsum and associated carbonates during uneven calcination, followed by atmospheric carbonation during hydration, may have led to the secondary formation of CaCO3. The minor presence of quartz and silicate phases likely results from extraneous mineral contamination.
SEM analysis further revealed the presence of film-like or fibrous material on the surface of gypsum crystals. These structures appear to inhibit normal crystal growth, leading to granular or aggregated morphologies [45]. Such microstructural modifications are consistent with the known effects of incorporating animal glue, which alters crystal formation pathways and can significantly influence mechanical properties. ATR-FTIR and Raman spectroscopy support the possibility of organic binding materials within the sample, although the current spectral data are ambiguous and require cautious interpretation, such as Raman features in the 1200–1800 cm−1 range deviate from standard reference spectra and allow for multiple interpretations.
The historical use of organic binding materials, such as animal glue in gypsum-based materials, is well documented [46,47,48]. In traditional plaster formulations, animal glue serves to slow hydration reactions, reduce moisture permeability, and enhance the dimensional stability and weathering resistance of the hardened material. It also improves mechanical performance by increasing flexural and compressive strength [45]. Despite these known effects, the presence of organic additives in Han dynasty gypsum-based materials remains to be definitively confirmed. Additional analyses using advanced techniques such as Py-GC-MS or proteomics will be necessary to determine the precise nature and role of organic substances in these ancient formulations.

4.2. Historical Context and Regional Utilization of Gypsum-Based Materials

Gypsum has long been valued for its ease of processing, low-temperature calcination, and excellent plasticity. These properties made it a widely used material in both architectural and artisanal contexts since the Neolithic period [49,50]. Early applications in the Near East included its use in construction, sculpture, and decorative artifacts [51]. In Egypt, during the Neo-Babylonian period and the 8th century BCE in Iberian fortresses, gypsum was employed as a key building material [52,53]. During the medieval period, its usage expanded across Europe, particularly in cities such as Paris, Chartres, and Lübeck, where it played important roles in both structural and decorative applications [54].
The production of ancient craft materials was closely constrained by the availability of natural resources, regional processing capabilities, and prevailing technological traditions. Different geographic areas developed distinct strategies for material selection and use, often shaped by their resource endowments. Since gypsum requires significantly less thermal energy for calcination than lime, it became the preferred material in fuel-scarce regions such as Mesopotamia and Egypt. In contrast, lime-based technologies were more prevalent in fuel-rich areas like the eastern Mediterranean and Anatolia [55]. In Egypt, abundant gypsum ore provided the foundation for large-scale and long-term use of the material in both architectural and decorative applications [56,57].
Similarly, the region surrounding Changsha in Hunan Province, China, is rich in gypsum resources. In Shaodong County, southwestern Hunan, for example, Cenozoic formations contain thick-bedded gypsum deposits that are often associated with calcite and other calcium carbonate minerals [58]. These gypsum layers are located at shallow depths and are suitable for manual extraction [59]. Such resource conditions supplied a material basis for local use of gypsum during ancient times.
Despite this geological abundance, archaeological evidence suggests that the widespread use of gypsum as a primary material for construction or sculptural modeling was extremely rare in China during and before the Han dynasty. In the Late Neolithic period, gypsum was primarily used as a white pigment for pottery decoration [60,61]. From the Han dynasty onward, it also appeared in traditional Chinese medicine, typically in its raw and ground form, rather than as a processed or calcined material [62]. Han dynasty wooden funerary objects, especially figurines, were usually carved from solid wood and directly painted without the use of preparatory layers.
This study provides the first evidence that a gypsum-based preparatory layer, serving as a plaster and as a putty to support surface modeling, was applied to wooden figurines that, to date, have only been identified in Hunan, as demonstrated by the findings of this study. This localized usage supports the view that ancient technologies were highly dependent on the availability and perception of regional materials and that material choices were shaped by both geological and cultural conditions.
Interestingly, wooden figurines from Han dynasty tombs in MWD and funerary statuettes from New Kingdom Egypt exhibit notable similarities in their surface preparation techniques. In both cases, a white preparatory layer was applied to the wooden substrate prior to polychrome decoration. Scientific analysis of an Egyptian shabti revealed that its ground layer consisted of a mixture of gypsum and calcite, likely used to smooth the surface and enhance visual brightness. In some instances, GC-MS analysis also suggested the presence of proteinaceous organic binders, which would have contributed to improved adhesion and cohesion of the overlying paint layers [63,64]. These parallels may reflect a shared functional response to the technical requirements of preparing wooden surfaces for painted decoration.
Nevertheless, the considerable geographic and temporal separation between East Asia and the Mediterranean–Egyptian world makes direct cultural transmission unlikely. The similarities observed in material application and surface preparation methods are more plausibly interpreted as independent innovations developed by artisans responding to similar technical needs. These findings highlight a broader phenomenon of convergent technological evolution, where distinct societies, working within their respective material contexts, arrived at comparable solutions through empirical engagement with available resources.

4.3. Deterioration Mechanisms and Conservation Implications

Gypsum-based materials are inherently susceptible to a range of physicochemical transformations when exposed to waterlogged burial environments or abrupt environmental changes following excavation. These transformations include mineralogical phase transitions, Ostwald ripening induced by cyclic wetting and drying, and partial dissolution followed by reprecipitation. Such processes can lead to the progressive coarsening of gypsum crystals, the formation of secondary crystal phases, and increased microstructural heterogeneity [50]. Collectively, these changes compromise the material’s structural cohesion and mechanical integrity, promoting degradation phenomena such as cracking, surface delamination, and powdering [54]. These effects present significant risks to the long-term preservation of gypsum-based cultural heritage. Similar observations have been reported in the conservation of Tang dynasty murals in Xinjiang, where spontaneous transformation of gypsum ground layers was identified as a key factor in mural deterioration [65].
The wooden figurines from the Han tombs at MWD were recovered from a waterlogged and anoxic burial environment, where they remained in a stable and saturated condition for over two millennia. The sudden environmental shift during excavation, from a moisture-rich to a dry and oxygenated atmosphere, likely initiated or accelerated the deterioration of the gypsum-based preparatory layers through the mechanisms described above. A clear understanding of the composition and behavior of both surface and substrate materials, especially those utilizing gypsum as a ground or fill layer, is essential for developing effective conservation strategies. Such knowledge not only informs decisions on material stabilization and environmental control but also enhances our understanding of historical technologies and the practical choices made by ancient artisans in response to material properties.

5. Conclusions

  • This study presents the first scientific characterization of a white preparatory layer on polychrome wooden figurines excavated from the Mawangdui Tomb No. 1, dated to the Han dynasty. Multi-analytical techniques, including XRF mapping, SEM, ATR-FTIR, XRD, and Raman spectroscopy, revealed that the preparatory layer consists primarily of gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O) and calcite (CaCO3), with minor high-temperature phases such as anhydrite and larnite. The preparatory layer exhibits a porous microstructure composed of interlocking needle-like gypsum crystals, consistent with the characteristics of low-strength plaster. In certain areas, it also functioned as a putty, filling surface irregularities and providing structural support for polychrome decoration. Spectroscopic analyses further indicate the possible presence of organic binders, although their composition remains inconclusive. The use of such a preparatory layer reflects a localized technological innovation specific to Hunan and represents the first confirmed application of gypsum-based materials in ancient Chinese woodcarving. While comparable surface preparation techniques involving gypsum and calcite have been observed in New Kingdom Egyptian artifacts, the considerable spatial and temporal distance between the two traditions suggests independent development. These similarities are better understood as examples of convergent technological responses, in which artisans in different cultural settings arrived at comparable solutions through practical engagement with similar materials.
  • In addition to material identification, this study highlights several conservation challenges and methodological limitations. The gypsum-based preparatory layer showed deterioration after excavation, including cracking, delamination, and powdering, reflecting its sensitivity to environmental fluctuations such as humidity, temperature, and air exposure. These issues emphasize the need for environmental control during excavation, transport, and storage. However, due to equipment constraints and the immovability of the artifacts, advanced imaging techniques such as high-resolution X-ray radiography and computed tomography (CT) were not applied. As a result, the internal structure of the wooden cores and the extent to which the external morphology was shaped by wood versus gypsum remains unclear. Likewise, the absence of molecular analyses such as pyrolysis–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (py-GC-MS) limited the identification of potential organic binders. Future research should address these gaps through the application of non-invasive or minimally invasive imaging and molecular techniques, which will be essential for clarifying the construction logic of these figurines and refining conservation strategies tailored to their complex material composition.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/coatings15040492/s1. Figure S1. Rietveld refinement residual evolution and XRD pattern with reference phase markers. Figure S2. Comparison of ATR-FTIR and Raman spectra with reference spectra for gypsum and calcite from the RRUFF™ database. Refs. [66,67,68] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.L.; methodology, N.X., P.X., and Q.L.; software, N.X.; validation, P.X. and Q.L.; formal analysis, P.X. and Q.L.; investigation, N.X., T.R., P.X., and Q.L.; resources, T.R.; data curation, P.X.; writing—original draft preparation, N.X. and Q.L.; writing—review and editing, Q.L.; visualization, Q.L.; supervision, Q.L.; project administration, Q.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFC3500900) and the Major Project of Hunan Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Foundation (Grant No. 20ZDAJ008). The APC was funded by the same sources.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Yanjiao Yu of the Hunan Museum for approving and facilitating access to the materials analyzed in this study. The authors are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which helped improve the quality of the manuscript. The authors used ChatGPT (ChatGPT-4o, OpenAI, accessed via chat.openai.com) to assist with English language editing during the preparation of this manuscript. All content, interpretations, and conclusions were independently developed by the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
SEMScanning Electron Microscopy
ATR-FTIRAttenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
RamanRaman Spectroscopy
MA-XRFMacro X-ray Fluorescence Mapping
µXRFMicro X-ray Fluorescence Mapping
XRDX-ray Diffraction
GC-MSGas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry
Py-GC-MSPyrolysis–Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry
MWDMawangdui

References

  1. Wei, S.; Ma, Q.; Schreiner, M. Scientific investigation of the paint and adhesive materials used in the Western Han Dynasty polychromy terracotta army, Qingzhou, China. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2012, 39, 1628–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Miller, A.R. Painting bronze in early China: Uncovering polychromy in China’s classical sculptural tradition. Arch. Asian Art 2022, 72, 1–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Blänsdorf, C.; Yin, X. A colourful world for the emperor’s soul: The polychromy of the terracotta sculptures at Qin Shihuang’s burial complex. Stud. Conserv. 2006, 51 (Suppl. S2), 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Rong, B.; Dang, H. Structural survey and pigment analysis of the paint layer on the cultural relics from the Han Yangling. Sci. Conserv. Archaeol. 2013, 25, 88–92. [Google Scholar]
  5. Feng, J.; Zhao, F.; Li, S. On-site conservation of the tomb mural of the Western Han Dynasty at Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, China. Stud. Conserv. 2014, 59 (Suppl. S1), S40–S43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rong, B.; Zhao, Q.; Wu, Z.; Zheng, H.; Zhao, J. Research on the polychrome potteries excavated from the Chengyangcheng site in Xinyang. Sci. Conserv. Archaeol. 2018, 30, 9–14. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, Y. The types and characteristics of the Han Dynasty wooden figurines unearthed in Jiangsu. J. Natl. Mus. China 2018, 8, 48–58. [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu, L.; Zhou, C.; Chen, N. Brief analysis on wooden human figurines of the Western Han Dynasty unearthed in the Jingzhou area. Jianghan Archaeol. 2023, 5, 103–111. [Google Scholar]
  9. Luo, T. An analysis of wooden figurines unearthed from Chu tombs in the Jingzhou area. Identif. Appreciat. Cult. Relics 2024, 17, 8–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gao, Z. A study on Chu figurines. In Bronzes of the Shang and Zhou Dynasties and Chu Culture; Yuelu Shushe: Changsha, China, 1999; pp. 180–207. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fu, J. Wooden figurine unearthed in Hunan Province. Collectors 2009, 10, 41–49. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhou, W.; Xu, D. A study on Chu-style wooden figurines. Jianghan Archaeol. 2019, 83–93. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang, H. A summary of the research on the wooden figurines from the Han tombs at Mawangdui. J. Hunan Prov. Mus. 2013, 84–87. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ren, T. A brief analysis of wooden disks from Han Tomb 1 at Mawangdui and other Chu and Han tombs. J. Hunan Mus. 2022, 79–93. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen, G.; Han, J. Analysis and restoration of pigments from Han Dynasty painted wooden horses at Mozuizi, Wuwei, Gansu Province. Sci. Conserv. Archaeol. 2011, 23, 40–46. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mazzinghi, A.; Ruberto, C.; Castelli, L.; Czelusniak, C.; Giuntini, L.; Mandò, P.A.; Taccetti, F. MA-XRF for the characterisation of the painting materials and technique of The Entombment of Christ by Rogier van der Weyden. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Saverwyns, S.; Currie, C.; Lamas-Delgado, E. Macro X-ray fluorescence scanning (MA-XRF) as tool in the authentication of paintings. Microchem. J. 2018, 137, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vanden Berghe, I.; Van Bos, M.; Vandorpe, M.; Coudray, A. Non-invasive analysis of heritage textiles with MA-XRF mapping—Exploring the possibilities. The study of Bishop Jacques de Vitry’s mitres and fragile medieval reliquary purses from Namur (Belgium). Herit. Sci. 2023, 11, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shen, G.; Wang, S.; Peng, S.; Ren, T.; Liu, Q. Discussion on the unearthed Yu Lü tubes and their silk packaging bags from the Mawangdui Han Tomb No. 1. Cult. Relics World 2024, 4, 56–60. [Google Scholar]
  20. Capobianco, G.; Sferragatta, A.; Lanteri, L.; Agresti, G.; Bonifazi, G.; Serranti, S.; Pelosi, C. µXRF mapping as a powerful technique for investigating metal objects from the archaeological site of Ferento (Central Italy). J. Imaging 2020, 6, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ruberto, C.; Mazzinghi, A.; Massi, M.; Castelli, L.; Czelusniak, C.; Palla, L.; Gelli, N.; Betuzzi, M.; Impallaria, A.; Brancaccio, R.; et al. Imaging study of Raffaello’s La Muta by a portable XRF spectrometer. Microchem. J. 2016, 126, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, L.; He, J.; Ye, M.; Zhu, Z.; Zhong, Q.; Yang, J. Spectral characterization of pigment from the No. 1 Cave, Kizil Cave-Temple Complex. J. Spectrosc. 2019, 2019, 8502524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nakamoto, K. Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds, Part B: Theory and Applications in Inorganic Chemistry, 6th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cvetković, J.; Petruševski, V.; Šoptrajanov, B. Reinvestigation of the water bending region in the spectra of gypsum-like compounds—An FTIR study. J. Mol. Struct. 1997, 408–409, 463–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Böke, H.; Akkurt, S.; Ozdemir, S.; Göktürk, E.; Saltik, E. Quantification of CaCO3–CaSO3·0.5H2O–CaSO4·2H2O mixtures by FTIR analysis and its ANN model. Mater. Lett. 2004, 58, 723–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Reig, F.B.; Adelantado, J.; Moya Moreno, M.C.M. FTIR quantitative analysis of calcium carbonate (calcite) and silica (quartz) mixtures using the constant ratio method. Application to geological samples. Talanta 2002, 58, 811–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Derrick, M.R.; Stulik, D.; Landry, J.M. Infrared Spectroscopy in Conservation Science; Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  28. González-Cabrera, M.; Domínguez-Vidal, A.; Ayora-Cañada, M.J. Monitoring UV-Accelerated Alteration Processes of Paintings by Means of Hyperspectral Micro-FTIR Imaging and Chemometrics. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2021, 253, 119568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Colombini, M.P.; Modugno, F.; Galanakis, E.; Ribechini, A. Analytical strategies for characterizing organic materials in wall paintings. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 440, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Prieto-Taboada, N.; Martinez-Arkarazo, I.; Castro, K.; Madariaga, J.M. Raman spectra of the different phases in the CaSO4–H2O system. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 10131–10137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schmid, T.; Kempe, U.; Panne, U.; Beckhoff, B. Insights into the CaSO4–H2O system: A Raman-spectroscopic study. Minerals 2020, 10, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, X.; Hua, F.; Xie, X.; Wu, Y.; Sun, W.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Luo, X. Infrared Raman spectroscopy enables noninvasive biochemical assessment of skin tissue and the thermal stability. Heliyon 2023, 9, e21974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cluff, K.; Naganathan, G.K.; Jonnalagada, D.; Mortensen, I.; Wehling, R.; Subbiah, J. Determination of yolk contamination in liquid egg white using Raman spectroscopy. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 1702–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jurašeková, Z.; Fabriciová, G.; Silveira, L.F.; Lee, Y.-N.; Gutak, J.M.; Ataabadi, M.M.; Kundrát, M. Raman spectra and ancient life: Vibrational ID profiles of fossilized (bone) tissues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Raii, M. Formulation, Caracterization and Implementation of Permeable Reactive Barrier (PRB) Made of Calcium Phosphate. Ph.D. Thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, Toulouse, France, 2012. Available online: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00842771 (accessed on 2 March 2025).
  36. Coccato, A.; Jehlička, J.; Moens, L.; Vandenabeele, P. Raman spectroscopy for the investigation of carbon-based black pigments. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2015, 46, 1003–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. De Faria, D.L.A.; Venâncio Silva, S.; Oliveira, M.T. Raman microspectroscopy of some iron oxides and oxyhydroxides. J. Raman Spectrosc. 1997, 28, 873–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vind, J.; Malfliet, A.; Bonomi, C.; Paiste, P.; Sajó, I.E.; Blanpain, B.; Tkaczyk, A.H.; Vassiliadou, V.; Panias, D. Modes of occurrences of scandium in Greek bauxite and bauxite residue. Miner. Eng. 2018, 123, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mishmastnehi, M.; Van Driessche, A.E.S.; Smales, G.J.; Moya, A.; Stawski, T.M. Advanced materials engineering in historical gypsum plaster formulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2208836120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mason, B. Larnite, Scawtite, and Hydrogrossular from Tokatoka, New Zealand. Am. Mineral. 1957, 42, 379–392. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yan, R.; Zheng, C.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, Y. Evaluation of combustion characteristics of Chinese high-ash coals. Energy Fuels 2003, 17, 1522–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Folgueras, M.B.; Díaz, R.M.; Xiberta, J. Sulphur retention during co-combustion of coal and sewage sludge. Fuel 2004, 83, 1315–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sanz-Rubio, E.; Sánchez-Moral, S.; Cañaveras, J.C.; Calvo, J.P.; Rouchy, J.M. Calcitization of Mg–Ca carbonate and Ca sulphate deposits in a continental Tertiary Basin (Calatayud Basin, NE Spain). Sediment. Geol. 2001, 140, 123–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mansour, A.S. Sedimentology and environmental interpretation of carbonate deposits associating the evaporites-bearing Miocene succession, Northern Western Desert, Egypt. Carbonates Evaporites 2015, 30, 167–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Elert, K.; Benavides-Reyes, C.; Cardell, C. Effect of animal glue on mineralogy, strength and weathering resistance of calcium sulfate-based composite materials. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2019, 96, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gettens, R.J.; Mrose, M.E. Calcium sulphate minerals in the grounds of Italian paintings. Stud. Conserv. 1954, 1, 174–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Romero-Pastor, J.; Duran, A.; Rodríguez-Navarro, A.B.; Van Grieken, R.; Cardell, C. Compositional and quantitative microtextural characterization of historic paintings by micro-X-ray diffraction and Raman microscopy. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 8420–8428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Antunes, V.; Candeias, A.; Oliveira, M.J.; Longelin, S.; Serrão, V.; Seruya, A.L.; Coroado, J.; Dias, L.; Mirão, J.; Carvalho, M.L. Characterization of gypsum and anhydrite ground layers in 15th and 16th century Portuguese paintings by Raman spectroscopy and other techniques. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2014, 45, 1026–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Moropoulou, A.; Bakolas, A.; Anagnostopoulou, S. Composite materials in ancient structures. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2005, 27, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kingery, W.D.; Vandiver, P.B.; Prickett, M. The beginnings of pyrotechnology, part II: Production and use of lime and gypsum plaster in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic Near East. J. Field Archaeol. 1988, 15, 219–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gourdin, W.H.; Kingery, W.D. The beginnings of pyrotechnology: Neolithic and Egyptian lime plaster. J. Field Archaeol. 1975, 2, 133–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Regourd, M.; Kerisel, J.; Deletie, P.; Haguenauer, B. Microstructure of mortars from Egyptian pyramids. Cem. Concr. Res. 1988, 18, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Verhoeven, K. Abü Qubür 1990. III. Operation F. A gypsum wall plaster from the ‘Parthian Building’. Micromorphological description and mineralogical analyses. North. Akkad Proj. Rep. 1991, 7, 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  54. Stoops, G.; Tsatskin, A.; Canti, M.G. Gypsic mortars and plasters. In Archaeological Soil and Sediment Micromorphology; Nicosia, C., Stoops, G., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 201–204. [Google Scholar]
  55. Rollefson, G.O. The uses of plaster at Neolithic’Ain Ghazal, Jordan. Archaeomaterials 1990, 4, 33–54. [Google Scholar]
  56. Heldal, T.; Bloxam, E.G.; Degryse, P.; Storemyr, P.; Kelany, A. Gypsum quarries in the northern Faiyum quarry landscape, Egypt: A geo-archaeological case study. In QuarryScapes: Ancient Stone Quarry Landscapes in the Eastern Mediterranean; Abu Jaber, N., Bloxam, E.G., Degryse, P., Heldal, T., Eds.; Special Publication 12; Norwegian Geological Survey of Norway: Bergen, Norway, 2009; pp. 51–66. [Google Scholar]
  57. Harrell, J.A. Amarna gypsite: A new source of gypsum for ancient Egypt. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2017, 11, 536–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, X.; Wang, C.; Huang, K.; Shen, L.; You, C.; Jiang, H.; Zhao, Y. Analysis of Gypsum Distribution, Types, Industrial Applications, and Prospecting Potential in China. Geol. China 2025, 1–32. Available online: http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1167.P.20240819.1414.009.html (accessed on 10 January 2025).
  59. Yi, M. Geological characteristics of the Liangshitang gypsum mine in Shaodong, Hunan. Build. Mater. Geol. 1987, 4, 17–23+66. [Google Scholar]
  60. Chen, X.; Ma, Q.; Song, D.; Hu, Z.; Li, Z. X-ray diffraction analysis of black and white pigments on Majiayao-type painted pottery. J. Lanzhou Univ. 2000, 2, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhu, X. Analysis of painted pottery pigments from the Majiayao Culture unearthed at the Niumendong site in Huining. Mus. Emperor Qin 2018, 207–212. [Google Scholar]
  62. Lu, H.; Meng, F. Discussion on the processing methods of gypsum in different historical periods. Chin. Med. Mater. 2000, 23, 142–143. [Google Scholar]
  63. Dodd, L.S.; Scott, D.A.; Nikias, G.A.; Au, J.; Ramos, A. The ritual significance of colour: Specialised pigments in a wooden Egyptian funerary statuette from the New Kingdom. J. Egypt. Archaeol. 2009, 95, 83–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Frederiksen, R. Plaster casts in antiquity. In Plaster Casts: Making, Collecting and Displaying from Classical Antiquity to the Present, Transformationen der Antike; Frederiksen, R., Marchand, E., Eds.; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; Volume 18. [CrossRef]
  65. Qu, J.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Dai, F.; Zhang, H.; Zeng, Z. A preliminary study on weathering process of salt in rock body at Mogao Grottoes, Dunhuang. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 1995, 15, 182–187+200. [Google Scholar]
  66. Downs, R.T. The RRUFF Project: An Integrated Study of the Chemistry, Crystallography, Raman and Infrared Spectroscopy of Minerals. RRUFF Database: R050009 (Calcite). Available online: http://rruff.info/R050009 (accessed on 12 April 2025).
  67. Downs, R.T. The RRUFF Project: An Integrated Study of the Chemistry, Crystallography, Raman and Infrared Spectroscopy of Minerals. RRUFF Database: R040029 (Gypsum). Available online: http://rruff.info/R040029 (accessed on 12 April 2025).
  68. Downs, R.T. The RRUFF Project: An Integrated Study of the Chemistry, Crystallography, Raman and Infrared Spectroscopy of Minerals. RRUFF Database: R150020 (Calcite). Available online: http://rruff.info/R150020 (accessed on 12 April 2025).
Figure 1. Top-down view of the Mawangdui Tomb No. 1 during excavation. The layout illustrates the central burial chamber and four surrounding side chambers. The red-highlighted area indicates the location where the wooden attendant figurines were discovered. The enlarged image on the right shows the figurines in situ, revealing their arrangement, posture, and preserved surface decoration. Image courtesy Hunan Museum.
Figure 1. Top-down view of the Mawangdui Tomb No. 1 during excavation. The layout illustrates the central burial chamber and four surrounding side chambers. The red-highlighted area indicates the location where the wooden attendant figurines were discovered. The enlarged image on the right shows the figurines in situ, revealing their arrangement, posture, and preserved surface decoration. Image courtesy Hunan Museum.
Coatings 15 00492 g001
Figure 2. Photographic and schematic documentation of the wooden figurine (ID: 5035) investigated in this study. (a) Infrared-reflected image at 760 nm; (b) optical image captured with a Sony A7R4 camera (Sony Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and a 90 mm macro lens (Sony Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The red box indicates the region scanned by µXRF. (d) shows the back of the figurine in visible light. (c,e) are line drawings of the front and back, respectively, where gray areas denote regions of pigment loss, cracking, or delamination. Scale bar = 20 mm. Images by Q.L.
Figure 2. Photographic and schematic documentation of the wooden figurine (ID: 5035) investigated in this study. (a) Infrared-reflected image at 760 nm; (b) optical image captured with a Sony A7R4 camera (Sony Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and a 90 mm macro lens (Sony Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The red box indicates the region scanned by µXRF. (d) shows the back of the figurine in visible light. (c,e) are line drawings of the front and back, respectively, where gray areas denote regions of pigment loss, cracking, or delamination. Scale bar = 20 mm. Images by Q.L.
Coatings 15 00492 g002
Figure 3. Detached fragment analyzed in this study, showing both the interior and exterior surfaces. The left image presents the inner surface composed of gray–white solid material, while the right image displays the painted outer surface decorated with red and black pigments. Red box A indicates the sampling area for SEM, ATR-FTIR, and Raman spectroscopy of the white material. Red box B marks the Raman sampling site for the red and black pigments. Scale bar = 20 mm.
Figure 3. Detached fragment analyzed in this study, showing both the interior and exterior surfaces. The left image presents the inner surface composed of gray–white solid material, while the right image displays the painted outer surface decorated with red and black pigments. Red box A indicates the sampling area for SEM, ATR-FTIR, and Raman spectroscopy of the white material. Red box B marks the Raman sampling site for the red and black pigments. Scale bar = 20 mm.
Coatings 15 00492 g003
Figure 4. SEM images of the gypsum-based preparatory layer showing the characteristic microstructure. The left image presents an overview of densely packed, needle-like crystals. The right image is a magnified view of the area marked by the red box, highlighting key morphological features. The yellow arrow points to typical needle-like gypsum crystals. The green arrow indicates film-like material coating the surfaces of some needle-like crystals, while the purple arrow marks plate-like crystals. Scale bars = 20 µm.
Figure 4. SEM images of the gypsum-based preparatory layer showing the characteristic microstructure. The left image presents an overview of densely packed, needle-like crystals. The right image is a magnified view of the area marked by the red box, highlighting key morphological features. The yellow arrow points to typical needle-like gypsum crystals. The green arrow indicates film-like material coating the surfaces of some needle-like crystals, while the purple arrow marks plate-like crystals. Scale bars = 20 µm.
Coatings 15 00492 g004
Figure 5. MA-XRF elemental distribution maps of the painted side of the detached fragment (as in Figure 3) acquired using the Bruker CRONO system. The images display the spatial distribution of calcium (Ca), sulfur (S), mercury (Hg), silicon (Si), potassium (K), and iron (Fe).
Figure 5. MA-XRF elemental distribution maps of the painted side of the detached fragment (as in Figure 3) acquired using the Bruker CRONO system. The images display the spatial distribution of calcium (Ca), sulfur (S), mercury (Hg), silicon (Si), potassium (K), and iron (Fe).
Coatings 15 00492 g005
Figure 6. High-resolution µXRF elemental distribution maps of the painted surface of Figurine 5035, with the scanned area corresponding to the region marked in Figure 2b. The images were acquired using the Bruker M4 Tornado system and are presented in heatmap format, showing the concentration gradients of calcium (Ca), sulfur (S), mercury (Hg), silicon (Si), potassium (K), and iron (Fe) across the analyzed area.
Figure 6. High-resolution µXRF elemental distribution maps of the painted surface of Figurine 5035, with the scanned area corresponding to the region marked in Figure 2b. The images were acquired using the Bruker M4 Tornado system and are presented in heatmap format, showing the concentration gradients of calcium (Ca), sulfur (S), mercury (Hg), silicon (Si), potassium (K), and iron (Fe) across the analyzed area.
Coatings 15 00492 g006
Figure 7. (a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the grayish–white preparatory layer. (b) Relative phase composition of the preparatory layer as determined by full-pattern Rietveld refinement.
Figure 7. (a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the grayish–white preparatory layer. (b) Relative phase composition of the preparatory layer as determined by full-pattern Rietveld refinement.
Coatings 15 00492 g007
Figure 8. ATR-FTIR spectra of the white preparatory sample. (a) Major peaks corresponding to sulfate (SO42−), hydroxyl (OH), and carbonate (CO32−) groups. (b) Weak bands around 1740 and 1241 cm−1 suggest the possible presence of organic components.
Figure 8. ATR-FTIR spectra of the white preparatory sample. (a) Major peaks corresponding to sulfate (SO42−), hydroxyl (OH), and carbonate (CO32−) groups. (b) Weak bands around 1740 and 1241 cm−1 suggest the possible presence of organic components.
Coatings 15 00492 g008
Figure 9. Raman spectra of white areas in the preparatory layer. (a) Peaks associated with gypsum, bassanite, and carbonate phases; (b) Broadbands between 1200 and 1800 cm−1 possibly related to degraded proteinaceous materials or structural disorder. The “+” signs and numbers 1–3 indicate the analyzed points and their corresponding order.
Figure 9. Raman spectra of white areas in the preparatory layer. (a) Peaks associated with gypsum, bassanite, and carbonate phases; (b) Broadbands between 1200 and 1800 cm−1 possibly related to degraded proteinaceous materials or structural disorder. The “+” signs and numbers 1–3 indicate the analyzed points and their corresponding order.
Coatings 15 00492 g009
Figure 10. Raman spectra of red and black pigments from the painted layer. (a) Disordered carbon identified by broad D and G bands, indicating the presence of soot or carbon black; (b) Characteristic peaks of cinnabar (HgS); (c) Signals corresponding to hematite (α-Fe2O3) and a weak band at 659 cm−1 that may indicate the presence of magnetite (Fe3O4). The “+” signs indicate the analyzed point.
Figure 10. Raman spectra of red and black pigments from the painted layer. (a) Disordered carbon identified by broad D and G bands, indicating the presence of soot or carbon black; (b) Characteristic peaks of cinnabar (HgS); (c) Signals corresponding to hematite (α-Fe2O3) and a weak band at 659 cm−1 that may indicate the presence of magnetite (Fe3O4). The “+” signs indicate the analyzed point.
Coatings 15 00492 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, N.; Ren, T.; Xiao, P.; Liu, Q. First Identification of a Gypsum-Based Preparatory Layer on Polychrome Wooden Figurines from the Mawangdui Han Tomb No. 1 (2nd Century BCE), Changsha, China. Coatings 2025, 15, 492. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15040492

AMA Style

Xu N, Ren T, Xiao P, Liu Q. First Identification of a Gypsum-Based Preparatory Layer on Polychrome Wooden Figurines from the Mawangdui Han Tomb No. 1 (2nd Century BCE), Changsha, China. Coatings. 2025; 15(4):492. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15040492

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Ningning, Tingyan Ren, Pan Xiao, and Qi Liu. 2025. "First Identification of a Gypsum-Based Preparatory Layer on Polychrome Wooden Figurines from the Mawangdui Han Tomb No. 1 (2nd Century BCE), Changsha, China" Coatings 15, no. 4: 492. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15040492

APA Style

Xu, N., Ren, T., Xiao, P., & Liu, Q. (2025). First Identification of a Gypsum-Based Preparatory Layer on Polychrome Wooden Figurines from the Mawangdui Han Tomb No. 1 (2nd Century BCE), Changsha, China. Coatings, 15(4), 492. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15040492

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop