Next Article in Journal
Cutting Performance of Low Stress Thick TiAlN PVD Coatings during Machining of Compacted Graphite Cast Iron (CGI)
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of a Scanning Radial Magnetic Field on Macroparticle Reduction of Arc Ion-Plated Films
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis, Characterization, and Application of Novel Ni-P-Carbon Nitride Nanocomposites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Nitrogen Partial Pressure on Microstructure and Tribological Properties of Mo-Cu-V-N Composite Coatings with High Cu Content
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improved Corrosion Resistance of 5XXX Aluminum Alloy by Homogenization Heat Treatment

Department of Energy, Materials and Chemical Engineering, Korea University of Technology and Education, Cheonan-si 31253, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Coatings 2018, 8(1), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings8010039
Submission received: 30 November 2017 / Revised: 28 December 2017 / Accepted: 15 January 2018 / Published: 18 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hybrid Surface Coatings & Process (Selected Papers from HyMaP 2017))

Abstract

:
The corrosion resistance of homogenized Al-Mg (6.5%) alloy—adding Si, Zn, Mn, and Fe (0.2%) to improve various properties—was observed. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and a JMatPro simulation revealed that the optimal homogenization temperature was 450 °C. The homogenization was carried out at 450 °C for 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 h in order to view the corrosion resistance change. Corrosion resistance was analyzed by a polarization test in 3.5 wt % NaCl solution. The corrosion resistance improved with increasing homogenization time up to 24 h, but there was no change with longer time periods. To observe the reason for the change in corrosion resistance, scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and transmission electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (TEM-EDS) analyses were performed. Precipitates containing Mg, such as Al3Mg2 and Mg32(Al, Zn)49, decreased at the grain boundary. After homogenization, the amount of Mg measured by SEM-EDS at the grain boundary decreased from 36% to 8%, while Si increased. Generally, the potential difference between the grain boundary and the grains leads to intergranular corrosion. Reduction of Mg, whose standard electrode potential is lower than that of Al, and an increase of Si, which is present in higher concentration than Al at the grain boundaries, improved the corrosion resistance of 5XXX Al alloy by reducing the intergranular corrosion.

1. Introduction

As the automotive industry has gradually become more sophisticated and subdivided, fuel economy regulations are becoming more stringent to address environmental issues. Accordingly, fuel efficiency improvement technology has been attracting a great deal of attention [1,2]. Among ways to improve fuel efficiency, adopting lighter weight vehicles is thought to be the most promising approach because it is expected to greatly improve the fuel efficiency through changes of structure, replacement of heavy materials with lightweight materials and reduction of the number of parts. Currently, non-ferrous metals such as Al and Mg are the mainly used light metals [3]. Among them, Al is 33% lighter than Fe, has higher strength and is excellent in terms of machining, thermoelectric conductivity, and low temperature brittleness [4]. Among the Al alloys, the Al 5000 series is an alloy containing Mg added to conventional Al. Mg has a high solubility limit in the Al matrix and a strong solid solution strengthening effect. At the same time, it has excellent ductility [5,6]. Also, Al 5000 alloys are generally used as an extruded material, but they contain Fe and Si and can also be used as casting materials. Alloys that can be used for both casting and extrusion improve the recyclability. However, when 3% or more of magnesium is added, β(Al3Mg2) phase, precipitated continuously at the grain boundaries, undergoes stress corrosion cracking and intergranular corrosion [7,8,9]. To solve this problem, Zn is added to the Al 5000 series alloy. This leads to precipitation of τ(Mg32(Al, Zn)49) phases and prevention of β phases at the grain boundaries, thereby improving the corrosion resistance and enhancing the mechanical properties [10]. In addition, alloy elements can be added to fulfill various goals. For example, Si improves the fluidity for casting [11]. Mn improves the tensile strength without decreasing the corrosion resistance. Fe prevents adhesion of liquid Al to the mold [12,13]. With these many aims, a new complex-composition Al alloy was investigated. Homogenization of the Al alloy distributes the secondary phase and thereby improves the tensile properties [14] and corrosion resistance [15]. However, research into the effect of homogenization on the corrosion behavior of Al-Mg-Zn alloys with Si, Fe, and Mn elements has not been reported. Therefore, in this study, the corrosion resistance of a new Al alloy was investigated depending on the homogenization time.

2. Experimental Details

The chemical composition of the Al 5XXX alloy is shown in Table 1. Specimens were prepared by wire cutting as 10 × 10 × 20 mm3 plates. In order to determine the optimum homogenization temperature, DSC analysis and JMatPro simulation were performed. The DSC analysis, performed by increasing the temperature by 1 °C/min up to 500 °C, recorded a change of enthalpy. Homogenization was carried out using a furnace by heating up to 450 °C at a rate of 100 °C/h and maintaining the temperature at 450 °C for 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 h; samples were then air cooled. For the polarization test, the surface of the specimen was polished with #2000 emery paper and washed with distilled water; this was followed by drying using nitrogen gas.
The polarization test conditions are shown in Table 2. Saturated calomel and graphite were used for the standard and counter electrodes, respectively. The electrolytic solution was water containing 3.5% NaCl. The experiment was carried out from −1.3 V to −0.2 V at a 0.5 mV/s scanning speed. Various methods were used to identify the cause of the corrosion resistance change after homogenization. An optical microscope was employed to observe the microstructure. The etching solution was Keller reagent (2 mL HF, 3 mL HCl, 5 mL HNO3 and 190 mL water), which is mainly used for Al-Mg-Zn [16]. The volume fraction of the grain boundaries was calculated using software from MEDIA cybernetics, Image pro 5.0. XRD was utilized to observe the secondary phase change. SEM-EDS and TEM-EDS were used to analyze the secondary phase present at the grain boundaries. The specimen for TEM was a 10 um thick foil prepared using FIB. The change in Mg content at the grain boundaries was investigated using TEM-EDS line scanning.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the results of the DSC analysis before homogenization. Power compensated DSC measures the energy required to maintain the temperature difference between the sample and the reference. Therefore, the peak at around 472.8 °C indicates heat flow compensating for the endothermic reaction. Since the melting point of Al is higher than 600 °C, this peak does not mean Al melting; rather, it indicates the dissolution of a secondary phase. The homogenization temperature was hence decided to set at below 470 °C [17].
Figure 2 shows the JMatPro simulation results illustrating the secondary phase formation with temperature change. The possible precipitates in Al 5XXX alloys are β(Al3Mg2), τ(Mg32(Al, Zn)49), Al6(Mn, Fe), AlMgCuZn, and Mg2Si. The dissolution at 478.2 °C, shown in Figure 1, corresponds to β and/or τ phase. Since the dissolution temperature of the β phase in the ordinary Al-Mg alloy is near 470 °C, the effective homogenization temperature for the β, τ phase reduction without Mg2Si dissolution was considered to be 450 °C.
Figure 3 illustrates the results of the polarization test. Tafel test was carried out to determine the change of potential and current density with homogenization time. In Figure 3a, the potential can be seen not to change with increasing homogenization time. This is because there was no significant change in the alloy composition with homogenization. The corrosion rate expressed in Equations (1) and (2) in ASTM G102 can be calculated from the measured current density in the Tafel test [18].
Corrosion   rate   ( mmpy ) = 3.27 × 10 3 × i corr × E · W density ( g cm 3 )
E · W = 1 n i f i W i
where i corr , current density [μA/cm2]; mmpy, mm/year (in corrosion depth); f i , the mass fraction of the i th element in the alloy; W i , the atomic weight of the element; n i , the number of electrons required to oxidize an atom of the element in the corrosion process, i.e., the valence of the element.
When the homogenization was carried out at 450 °C for up to 24 h, the corrosion rate decreased steadily and it was saturated after 24 h. The optimum homogenization time for improving the corrosion resistance was thus determined to be 24 h.
Figure 4 demonstrates the change in microstructure with homogenization time. In order to numerically express the grain boundary volume fraction, program calculation was carried out and the results are shown in Figure 4h. Due to the grain growth, the grain boundary volume fraction decreases as the homogenization time increases to 24 h. After 24 h, the decrease slows, as anticipated by Fick’s law; a similar result was reported by Li et al. [19]. The shapes in Figure 3b and Figure 4h were very similar. Therefore, it can be considered that the corrosion rate and grain boundary are closely correlated.
Figure 5 displays X-ray diffraction analysis results confirming the existence of a secondary phase during the homogenization. Before the homogenization, peaks (8 8 0) and (10 6 2), which can be indexed to the β phase, and peak (6 3 1), which is ascribed to the τ phase [20], are observed. After 24 h of homogenization, the β and τ phases disappeared due to the dissolution of the second phases.
Figure 6 and Table 3 show the SEM-EDS analysis results of the secondary phase before homogenization. In Figure 2 and Figure 6 and Table 3, we observed β(Al3Mg2), τ(Mg32(Al, Zn)49), Mg2Si and Al6(Mn, Fe). Phase A is considered to be a mixture of β and τ phases with a small amount of Cu. Phases B and D, frequently observed around phase A, are similar to Al6(Mn, Fe). Phase C is Mg2Si.
Figure 7 and Table 4 present SEM-EDS images and the composition of the secondary phases at the grain boundary after homogenization. The main secondary phase in the grain boundaries was likely Si and/or Mg2Si, as can be identified in Table 4. This means that β(Al3Mg2), τ(Mg32(Al, Zn)49) phases are reduced during homogenization at the grain boundaries and Si and/or Mg2Si are formed. The difference in the composition of Si and Mg2Si between 24 h and 30 h was not clear.
Figure 8 displays the SEM-EDS composition map after 24 h homogenization. The map confirms again that secondary phases such as β and τ almost completely disappear at the grain boundary and, instead, levels of Mg2Si and Si increased after homogenization. This can be explained by diffusion, following the Arrhenius equation below
D = D 0 exp [ Q R T ]
where D 0 , diffusion coefficient [m2/s]; R, mole gas constant; Q, diffusion activation energy [kJ/mole]; T, thermodynamic temperature.
In Equation (3), the diffusion activation energy Q of Si is larger than those of Mg, Mn, and Fe [21]. Accordingly, the distribution of Si at the grain boundaries increases with temperature. The presence of Si at the grain boundary at high temperature prevents the precipitation of other phases and increases the potential of the grain boundary via the high potential of Si after homogenization [22]. This potential increase can decelerate the intergranular corrosion. In addition, the β phase is known to form easily at grain boundaries as well as at the periphery of Al6(Mn, Fe) [23]. The reduction of the Al6(Mn, Fe) phase at the grain boundary by homogenization can decrease the precipitation of β phases at the grain boundary because β phases prefer to precipitate around Al6(Mn, Fe).
As shown before in Figure 6 and Figure 8, amounts of Mg, Mn, Fe, and Zn decrease with homogenization. This means β, τ, Al6(Mn, Fe) phases decrease. On the contrary, Si increases by homogenization at the grain boundary. The corrosion of β and τ, which mainly contain Mg, activate galvanic corrosion because the standard reduction potential of Mg is lower than that of Al [24,25]. As reported by Zeng et al., in the Al6000 alloy, Mg accelerated inter-granular corrosion with a standard reduction potential, which is lower than that of Al; Si has with a higher standard reduction potential than discontinuous Mg2Si, which acts as a sacrificial anode to improve corrosion resistance, especially at the grain boundary [26]. Similarly, for the Al 5XXX alloy in this study, Mg containing β and τ phases in the grain boundary significantly lowers the grain boundary potential, but Si, with higher potential and sacrificial Mg2Si, can increase the grain boundary potential. A decrease in Mg and increases in Si and Mg2Si at the grain boundary by homogenization, therefore, would be the main reason for the improvement of the corrosion resistance.
Figure 9 shows results of TEM-EDS line scanning of the interface between the Al matrix and the secondary phase after homogenization for 24 h at 450 °C. After the homogenization, a remainder of Mg2Si phase was confirmed.

4. Conclusions

In this study, a new Al-Mg-Zn-Mn-Fe-Si Al 5XXX alloy was homogenized and the corrosion resistance was investigated. Homogenization was conducted at 450 °C for 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 h.
The corrosion resistance improved steadily with homogenization time and saturated after 24 h. With homogenization, the grain boundary volume fraction decreased and the corrosion rate decreased. The second phases recognized at the grain boundary are mainly β(Al3Mg2), τ(Mg32(Al, Zn)49), and Al6(Mn, Fe) before homogenization and Mg2Si and Si after homogenization.
The secondary phase present in the grain boundary had a large amount of Mg before homogenization and it is thought that the Mg, with a lower standard reduction potential, would intensify the intergranular corrosion.
With homogenization, the β and τ phase with high Mg content decreased at the grain boundary by diffusion into grains, while Si preferentially diffused to the grain boundary at high temperature homogenization can remain in Si and/or Mg2Si at the grain boundary. Furthermore, the high reduction potential of Si and sacrificial Mg2Si would reduce the intergranular corrosion, resulting in the better corrosion resistance of the newly developed Al 5XXX alloy.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Korea University of Technology and Education.

Author Contributions

Sang-Ho Kim and In-Kyu Choi conceived and designed the experiments; In-Kyu Choi performed the experiments; In-Kyu Choi, Soo-Ho Cho, Sung-Joon Kim, and Yoo-Shin Jo analyzed the data; In-Kyu Choi, Soo-Ho Cho, Sung-Joon Kim, and Yoo-Shin Jo contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Sang-Ho Kim and In-Kyu Choi wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Adam, H. Carbon fiber in automotive applications. Mater. Des. 1997, 18, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Erica, R.-F.; Frank, R.-F.; Richard, R.; Randolph, E.-K. Strategic materials selection in the automobile body: Economic opportunities for polymer composite design. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2008, 68, 1989–2002. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jürgen, H. Aluminum in innovative light-weight car design. Mater. Trans. 2011, 52, 818–824. [Google Scholar]
  4. Miller, W.-S.; Zhuang, L.; Bottema, J.; Wittebrood, A.-J.; Smet, P.-D.; Haszler, A.; Vieregge, A. Recent development in aluminum alloys for the automotive industry. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2000, 280, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jones, R.-H.; Baer, D.-R.; Danielson, M.-J.; Vetrano, J.-S. Role of Mg in the stress corrosion cracking of an Al-Mg alloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2001, 32, 1699–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, J.-M.; Seong, K.-D.; Jun, J.H.; Kim, K.-T.; Jung, W.-J. Variation of fluidity and mechanical properties of Al-Mg alloys with the addition of Si, Mn and Zn. J. Korean Foundry Soc. 2004, 24, 138–144. [Google Scholar]
  7. Searles, J.-L.; Gouma, P.-I.; Buchheit, R.-G. Stress corrosion cracking of sensitized AA5083. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2001, 32, 2859–2867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Romhanji, E.; Popović, M.; Glišić, D.; Stefanović, M.; Milovanović, M. On the Al-Mg Alloy sheets for automotive application: Problems and solutions. Metalurgija 2004, 10, 205–216. [Google Scholar]
  9. Braun, R. Environmentally assisted cracking of aluminum alloys in chloride solutions. In Proceedings of the ICAA-6: 6th International Conference on Aluminium Alloys, Toyohashi, Japan, 5–10 July 1998; pp. 153–164. [Google Scholar]
  10. Meng, C.; Zhang, D.; Hua, C.; Zhuang, L.; Zhang, J. Mechanical properties, intergranular corrosion behavior and microstructure of Zn modified Al–Mg alloys. J. Alloy. Compd. 2014, 617, 925–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cho, J.-I.; Kim, C.-W. Effects of Mg and Si on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-Mg die casting alloy. J. Korean Foundry Soc. 2012, 32, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Davis, J.-R. Fabrication and Finishing of Aluminum Alloys. In Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys; Davis, J.-R., Ed.; ASM International: Novelty, OH, USA, 1991; pp. 351–416. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yun, H.-S.; Kim, J.-M.; Park, J.-S.; Kim, K.-T. Properties and casting characteristics of Al-Zn-Fe-Si alloys. J. Korean Foundry Soc. 2013, 33, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Park, J.-H.; Lee, D.-H.; Nam, S.-W. Effect of Mn addition and homogenization heat treatment on the tensile properties in Al-Mg-Si alloy system. J. Korean Inst. Met. Mater. 1997, 35, 281–287. [Google Scholar]
  15. Popović, M.; Romhanji, E. Stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of Al–Mg alloy sheet with high Mg content. J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 2002, 125, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cerri, E.; Evangelista, E. Metallography of Aluminum alloys. In TALAT Lecture 1202: Metallography of Aluminum Alloys; Core-Materials: Liverpool, UK, 2009; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jiang, H.-C.; Ye, L.-Y.; Zhang, X.-M.; Gu, G.; Zhang, P.; Wu, Y.-L. Intermetallic phase evolution of 5059 aluminum alloy during homogenization. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2013, 23, 3553–3560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. ASTM G102 Standard Practice for Calculation of Corrosion Rates and Related Information from Electrochemical Measurements; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1994; pp. 416–422.
  19. Li, H.-Y.; Su, X.-J.; Yin, H.; Huang, D.-S. Microstructural evolution during homogenization of Al-Cu-Li-Mn-Zr-Ti alloy. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2013, 23, 2543–2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Auld, J.-H.; Williams, B.-E. X-ray powder data of Tphases composed of aluminium and magnesium with silver, copper or zinc. Acta Cryst. 1966, 21, 830–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Du, Y.; Chang, Y.-A.; Huang, B.; Gong, W.; Jin, Z.; Xu, H.; Yuan, Z.; Liu, Y.; He, Y.; Xie, F.-Y. Diffusion coefficients of some solutes in fcc and liquid Al: Critical evaluation and correlation. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2003, 363, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tan, L.; Allen, T.-R. Effect of thermomechanical treatment on the corrosion of AA5083. Corros. Sci. 2010, 52, 548–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yan, J.; Andrea, M.-H. Study of β precipitation and layer structure formation in Al 5083: The role of dispersoids and grain boundaries. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 703, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sukiman, N.-L.; Gupta, R.-K.; Buchheit, R.-G.; Birbilis, N. Influence of microalloying additions on Al-Mg alloy. Part 1: Corrosion and electrochemical response. Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2014, 49, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jones, D.-A. Principles and Prevention of Corrosion; Macmillan Publishing Co.: London, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zeng, F.-L.; Wei, Z.-L.; Li, J.-F.; Li, C.-X.; Tan, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zheng, Z.-Q. Corrosion mechanism associated with Mg2Si and Si particles in Al−Mg−Si alloys. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2011, 21, 2559–2567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. DSC analysis before homogenization.
Figure 1. DSC analysis before homogenization.
Coatings 08 00039 g001
Figure 2. JMatPro simulation analyzing the second phase formation.
Figure 2. JMatPro simulation analyzing the second phase formation.
Coatings 08 00039 g002
Figure 3. (a) Polarization potential obtained from Tafel analysis; (b) Corrosion rate calculated from the polarization current density of Tafel analysis.
Figure 3. (a) Polarization potential obtained from Tafel analysis; (b) Corrosion rate calculated from the polarization current density of Tafel analysis.
Coatings 08 00039 g003
Figure 4. Optical microstructure depending on the homogenization time (×100): (a) no homogenization, (b) 3 h, (c) 6 h, (d) 12 h, (e) 18 h, (f) 24 h, and (g) 30 h at 450 °C; (h) volume fraction of grain boundary calculated by Image pro 5.0.
Figure 4. Optical microstructure depending on the homogenization time (×100): (a) no homogenization, (b) 3 h, (c) 6 h, (d) 12 h, (e) 18 h, (f) 24 h, and (g) 30 h at 450 °C; (h) volume fraction of grain boundary calculated by Image pro 5.0.
Coatings 08 00039 g004
Figure 5. XRD analyses with no and 24 h homogenization.
Figure 5. XRD analyses with no and 24 h homogenization.
Coatings 08 00039 g005
Figure 6. SEM-EDS mapping of secondary phases before homogenization.
Figure 6. SEM-EDS mapping of secondary phases before homogenization.
Coatings 08 00039 g006
Figure 7. SEM-EDS secondary phase analysis after homogenization at: (a) 450 °C, 24 h; (b) 450 °C, 30 h.
Figure 7. SEM-EDS secondary phase analysis after homogenization at: (a) 450 °C, 24 h; (b) 450 °C, 30 h.
Coatings 08 00039 g007
Figure 8. SEM-EDS mapping of secondary phases after homogenization.
Figure 8. SEM-EDS mapping of secondary phases after homogenization.
Coatings 08 00039 g008
Figure 9. (a) TEM image; (b) TEM-EDS line scanning profile of the interface between Al matrix and second phase after 24 h homogenization at 450 °C.
Figure 9. (a) TEM image; (b) TEM-EDS line scanning profile of the interface between Al matrix and second phase after 24 h homogenization at 450 °C.
Coatings 08 00039 g009
Table 1. Chemical composition of the Al 5XXX alloy (all in wt %).
Table 1. Chemical composition of the Al 5XXX alloy (all in wt %).
MgZnSiMnFeCuTiBAl
6.51.50.20.20.20.10.10.1Balanced
Table 2. Polarization test conditions.
Table 2. Polarization test conditions.
ParameterVaule
Start Potential (V)−1.3
Final Potential (V)−0.2
Scanning Speed (mV/s)0.5
Time (s)2200
Temperature (°C)25
Standard ElectrodeSaturated calomel electrode
Counter ElectrodeGraphite electrode
Electrolyte3.5 wt % NaCl
Specimen Density2.6 g/cm3
Table 3. Chemical composition of secondary phases in Figure 6 before homogenization.
Table 3. Chemical composition of secondary phases in Figure 6 before homogenization.
PhaseComposition (wt %)
AlMgZnFeMnSiCu
A51.5437.647.733.09
B79.818.824.347.03
C87.678.373.96
D69.7310.662.4317.18
Table 4. Chemical composition of secondary phases in Figure 7 after homogenization.
Table 4. Chemical composition of secondary phases in Figure 7 after homogenization.
PhaseComposition (wt %)
AlMgZnFeMnSiCu
(a)90.398.221.39
(b)90.608.061.34

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choi, I.-K.; Cho, S.-H.; Kim, S.-J.; Jo, Y.-S.; Kim, S.-H. Improved Corrosion Resistance of 5XXX Aluminum Alloy by Homogenization Heat Treatment. Coatings 2018, 8, 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings8010039

AMA Style

Choi I-K, Cho S-H, Kim S-J, Jo Y-S, Kim S-H. Improved Corrosion Resistance of 5XXX Aluminum Alloy by Homogenization Heat Treatment. Coatings. 2018; 8(1):39. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings8010039

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choi, In-Kyu, Soo-Ho Cho, Sung-Joon Kim, Yoo-Shin Jo, and Sang-Ho Kim. 2018. "Improved Corrosion Resistance of 5XXX Aluminum Alloy by Homogenization Heat Treatment" Coatings 8, no. 1: 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings8010039

APA Style

Choi, I. -K., Cho, S. -H., Kim, S. -J., Jo, Y. -S., & Kim, S. -H. (2018). Improved Corrosion Resistance of 5XXX Aluminum Alloy by Homogenization Heat Treatment. Coatings, 8(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings8010039

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop