Next Article in Journal
Proteomic Analysis of Exosomes Secreted from Human Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Overexpressing Mesenchymal Stromal Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Heavy Metal Effects on Biodiversity and Stress Responses of Plants Inhabiting Contaminated Soil in Khulais, Saudi Arabia
Previous Article in Journal
Increasing Step Rate Affects Rearfoot Kinematics and Ground Reaction Forces during Running
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessments of the Ecological and Health Risks of Potentially Toxic Metals in the Topsoils of Different Land Uses: A Case Study in Peninsular Malaysia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Ecological-Health Risk Assessments of Heavy Metals (Cu, Pb, and Zn) in Aquatic Sediments from the ASEAN-5 Emerging Developing Countries: A Review and Synthesis

by
Chee Kong Yap
1,* and
Khalid Awadh Al-Mutairi
2
1
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
2
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, P.O. Box 741, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2022, 11(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11010007
Submission received: 2 December 2021 / Revised: 16 December 2021 / Accepted: 18 December 2021 / Published: 21 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metals in Biology)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This study aimed to review and compile the concentrations of Cu, Pb, and Zn in the aquatic sediments of the ASEAN-5 countries published in the literature from 1981 to February 2021. The mean values of Cu, Pb, and Zn in aquatic sediments were found to be elevated and localized in high human activity sites in comparison to the earth’s upper continental crust and reference values. All reports (100%) showed the Zn ecological risk (ER) values were categorized as being between ‘low potential ER’ and ‘considerable potential ER’. Almost all Cu ER values (97.7%) showed similar ranges of the above two risk categories except for a few reports. Almost all reports (96%) showed Pb ER values categorized as between ‘low potential ER’ and ‘moderate potential ER’ except for a few reports. For the ingestion and dermal contact pathways for sediments, all non-carcinogenic risk (NCR) values for Cu, Pb, and Zn reflected no NCR. This provided evidence for the ASEAN-5 group of countries to be considered as being a new socio-economic corridor. Lastly, we claim that this study is currently the most up-to-date review on this topic in the literature.

Abstract

The ASEAN-5 countries (Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, and Vietnam) of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations as a group is an ever-increasing major economy developmental hub in Asia besides having wealthy natural resources. However, heavy metal (HM) pollution in the region is of increasing environmental and public concern. This study aimed to review and compile the concentrations of Cu, Pb, and Zn in the aquatic sediments of the ASEAN-5 countries published in the literature from 1981 to February 2021. The mean values of Cu, Pb, and Zn in aquatic sediments were elevated and localized in high human activity sites and compared to the earth’s upper continental crust and reference values. Based on 176 reports from 113 publications, the ranges of concentrations (mg/kg dry weight) were 0.09–3080 for Cu, 0.37–4950 for Zn, and 0.07–2666 for Pb. The ecological risk (ER) values ranged from 0.02–1077 for Cu, 0.01–95.2 for Zn, and 0.02–784 for Pb. All reports (100%) showed the Zn ER values were categorized as being between ‘low potential ecological risk’ and ‘considerable potential ecological risk’. Almost all Cu ER values (97.7%) also showed similar ranges of the above two risk categories except for a few reports. The highest Cu level (3080 mg/kg dry weight) was reported from a mine-tailing spill in Marinduque Island of the Philippines with ‘very high ecological risk’. In addition, drainage sediments in the western part of Peninsular Malaysia were categorized as Cu ’high potential ecological risk’. Almost all reports (96%) showed Pb ER values categorized as between ‘low potential ecological risk’ and ‘moderate potential ecological risk’ except for a few reports. Six reports showed Pb ER values of ‘considerable potential ecological risk’, while one report from Semarang (Indonesia) showed Pb ER of ‘very high ecological risk’ (Pb level of 2666 mg/kg dry weight). For the ingestion and dermal contact pathways for sediments from the ASEAN-5 countries, all non-carcinogenic risk (NCR) values (HI values 1.0) for Cu, Pb, and Zn reflected no NCR. The ER and human health risk assessment of Cu, Pb, and Zn were compared in an integrative and accurate manner after we reassessed the HM data mentioned in the literature. The synthesis carried out in this review provided the basis for us to consider Cu, Pb, and Zn as being of localized elevated levels. This provided evidence for the ASEAN-5 group of countries to be considered as being a new socio-economic corridor. Beyond any reasonable doubt, an ever-increasing anthropogenic input of HMs is to be expected to a certain degree. We believe that this paper provides the most fundamental useful baseline data for the future management and sustainable development of the aquatic ecosystems in the region. Lastly, we claim that this review is currently the most up-to-date review on this topic in the literature.

1. Introduction

According to the World Economic Outlook Database [1], the Association of Southeast Asian Nations ASEAN-5 countries are categorized as ‘Emerging and developing Asia’. The ASEAN-5 countries include Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines, and Vietnam. According to Worldometer [2], as of 2020, populations of these countries are Indonesia (273.5 million), the Philippines (109.6 million), Vietnam (97.3 million), Thailand (69.8 million), and Malaysia (32.4 million).
The gross domestic product (GDP) in the ASEAN-5 countries in 2020 is presented in Table 1. With a 582.6 million population in total, the ASEAN-5 countries have the third largest population in the world (after China; 1442.7 million and India; 1388.3 million) and a GDP of USD 2.85 trillion (Table 1).
Many studies on sediment heavy metals (HMs) have been widely reported from the ASEAN-5 countries, including Malaysia [6,7,8,9,10], Thailand [11,12,13], Philippines [14], Vietnam [15,16], and Indonesia [17,18,19]. All the studies partly assessed the ecological risk (ER) of metals but not at all for the human health risk assessment (HHRA) of HMs.
People living in coastal regions and coastal reclamation areas should be aware of the HM exposure danger in estuarine wetlands. This is especially true for fishermen and consumers of local fish. The ecological and human health concerns of sediment-associated metals in large-scale estuary areas were investigated in this study since the ecological-human risks of HMs in the sediments had only recently been reported in the literature [20,21].
HM pollution in sediment is of severe concern, especially in developing countries, and it necessitates intensive monitoring to understand the current condition and to suggest potential remedial strategies [22]. During the years 1999 to 2009, Fang and Yang [23] examined data on Cu, Pb, and Zn in river sediments in Taiwan, China, Japan, India, and Vietnam. They found that anthropogenic activities such as home and industrial wastewater, as well as e-waste recycling, chemical, electric plating, and refining industries, were the main contributors of HM contamination. Haque et al. [24] examined several regulating parameters after reviewing more than 250 papers on metal–soil–plant interactions; Cu, Pb, and Zn were the metals studied. They summarized the HM pollution’s impact on the soil environment, plant physiology, and factors influencing individual metal uptakes.

1.1. Why Focus on Sediments?

Firstly, there are a number of publications in the literature on this topic. Based on papers published in academic journals from 1964 until February 2021, listed in the Scopus database, there were 8196 papers with paper titles that included ‘metal’ and ‘sediments’. In 2020 alone, there was a total of 493 papers. We expect that the number would be higher if the titles of the papers included ‘element’ and ‘pollution’. The number is also expected to be significantly higher if non-Scopus indexed journals were to be taken into account. These numbers indicated the importance of monitoring HMs in aquatic sediments. It is reasonable to believe that such monitoring studies would be increasing in the future.
Secondly, HMs in sediments can constitute secondary sources of contamination in aquatic ecosystems due to social-economic activities such as smelting, electroplating, leather making, and electronics, agriculture (fertilizers and pesticides), and aquaculture industries. All the above activities intensify the stresses on the water and the environment by producing large quantities of municipal [25,26], and industrial wastewater [8,27,28,29] that contain potentially toxic chemicals including HMs.
Thirdly, the sediment is the sink of potentially toxic HMs [30]. HMs are mostly delivered into the marine environment via rivers and estuaries, where they are frequently bound to particulate matters, which settle and are absorbed into the sediment. As a result, in aquatic ecosystems, surface sediments are the primary storage and sink for metals and contaminants [31,32].

1.2. Why Use the Ecological Risk Index?

First, based on Scopus data searched on 9 January 2021, the use of the potential ecological risk index (PERI), which was first proposed by Hakanson [33], received a total of 3682 hits. Hakanson [33] and Zhuang et al. [34] were the first and last citations, respectively. For Cu, Pb, and Zn, all these citations employed the same toxic response factor. This could be due to the fact that there is no more recent research in the literature. The background levels used in the quoted data from this paper, on the other hand, are different. The pre-industrial reference levels proposed by Hakanson [33], the upper continental crust (UCC) levels of the HMs proposed by Wedepohl [35], Turekian and Wedepohl [36], Taylor and McLennan [37], and Rudnick and Gao [38] were among the background levels used in the literature. The background values of Wedepohl [35] were used in this work for PERI determinations because they have garnered 3508 citations in Scopus so far (until 10 January 2021). Secondly, because of the variability and lack of comprehensiveness of HM risk estimates in surface sediments in the literature [39], in the present study we used the reported data of Cu, Pb, and Zn and re-analyzed them for ER values, which were then used to make accurate comparative interpretations. We also used the similar levels of background upper continental earth crust (UCC) by Wedepohl [35] of the three HMs besides the toxic response levels by [33]. Furthermore, the PERI was also based on Cu, Pb, and Zn.

1.3. Objectives of the Study

This paper compiled the data of Cu, Pb, and Zn in the aquatic sediments from SEA countries available in the literature from 1980 to January 2021. In this paper, the literature was reviewed and the data published by various authors were analyzed to assess the HM status of aquatic sediments of the ASEAN-5 countries, namely Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, and Vietnam. Therefore, the objectives of this paper were (1) to review the three HM concentrations in the aquatic sediments from the ASEAN-5 countries, and (2) to determine the ER and human health risk assessment (HHRA) based on the reviewed data for effective comparative study and interpretation.

2. Methodology

2.1. Data Collection

The current review research followed the systematic literature review (SLR) approach of Moher et al. [40] from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to add to the existing body of knowledge on HMs in ASEAN-5 aquatic sediments. PRISMA is a reporting standard that is based on scientific evidence and can be used for critical evaluation. Figure 1 depicts the formal approach’s measures, which have been modified for this review work.
Due to Scopus being the most widely utilized database for conducting literature searches, it was employed for the analysis. Scopus is the largest dynamic reference information database that investigated writings that included logical diaries, novels, and gathering procedures [41] as of 29 April 2020. The evaluated papers comprised of the scholastic distributions on the topics of ‘Metals’, ‘Sediments’ and ‘Malaysia or Indonesia or Thailand or Philippines or Vietnam’ that were accessible on the Scopus bibliographic information base, chosen for its size and assortment of distributions.
On 1 February 2021, a survey of the literature based on the databases of Scopus and non-Scopus was conducted to arrive at a total of 208 published papers (149 Scopus indexed and 59 non-Scopus indexed papers) (Figure 1) where the keywords ‘Metals’, ‘Sediments’ and ‘Malaysia or Indonesia or Thailand or Philippines or Vietnam’ must be found in the title of the papers under the Scopus database. Due to duplicate publications, four papers were removed, with 204 papers remaining.
However, out of the 204 papers (Figure 1), a total of 15 papers were irrelevant and they were discarded from this review paper since the present paper focused on aquatic sediments including lakes, rivers, and coastal environment of the ASEAN-5 countries. Therefore, only 189 papers remained for evaluation in this review paper where 76 papers were used for the qualitative synthesis and 113 papers were included for the quantitative synthesis. The 76 papers used for the qualitative synthesis were Indonesia (26 papers), Thailand (13 papers), Vietnam (14 papers), Malaysia (17 papers), and the Philippines (6 papers).
The 113 papers included for the quantitative synthesis were relevant and representative of the study area in the ASEAN-5 countries. Most importantly, they were selected based on their presentations of data on Cu, Pb, and Zn in them screened and their contents were scrutinized. The quantitative synthesis was carried out by the calculations of the ER and the HHRA of Cu, Pb, and Zn based on the selected 113 papers, which consisted of 84 Scopus-indexed papers (74%), and 29 non-Scopus papers (26%). Overall, there were 15 papers from Indonesia (9 Scopus and 6 non-Scopus papers; 24 reports), 11 papers from Thailand (9 Scopus and 2 non-Scopus papers; 18 reports), 15 papers from Vietnam (13 Scopus and 2 non-Scopus papers; 24 reports), 65 papers from Malaysia (46 Scopus and 19 non-Scopus papers; 99 reports), and 7 papers from Philippines (7 Scopus paper; 11 reports) (Table 2).

2.2. Data Interpretation

2.2.1. Ecological Risk Index (ERI)

Potential ecological risk index (PERI) was used to determine the potential risk of the HMs in the topsoil to the ecology. This PERI was proposed by Hakanson [33]. The tabulations of PERI were done in a series of formulas.
Firstly, the calculation of contamination factor (Cf) was based on the pollution of a single metal factor in Equation (1).
Cf = C s C B
where Cs is the concentration of the metal in the topsoil. CB is the background value of each metal in the topsoil. The present study used the background concentration in the earth’s upper continental crust (UCC) which are Cu (14.3 mg/kg), Pb (17.0 mg/kg), and Zn (52.0 mg/kg) based on Wedepohl [35].
Secondly, the calculation of ER, which is the potential ER of a single element, was calculated based on Equation (2).
ER = T R × Cf
where TR is the toxic response factor of a single element. The TR values used in the present study are Cu = 5.00, Pb = 5.00, and Zn = 1.00, according to Hakanson [33]. According to Hakanson [33], the ER is divided into five categories: ‘low potential ecological risk’ (Er < 40), ‘moderate potential ecological risk’ (40 ≤ ER < 80), ‘considerable potential ecological risk’ (80 ≤ ER < 160), ‘high potential ecological risk’ (160 ≤ ER < 320), and ‘very high ecological risk’ (ER ≥ 320).
Lastly, the summation of all the ER values for each metal would result in the PERI value, which was calculated based on Equation (3).
PERI = ER
According to Hakanson [43], there are four different classifications for PERI values: ‘low ecological risk’ (PERI < 150), ‘moderate ecological risk’ (150 ≤ PERI < 300), ‘considerable ecological risk’ (300 ≤ PERI < 600), and ‘very high ecological risk’ (PERI ≥ 600).

2.2.2. Human Health Risk Assessment

Ingestion, inhalation, and skin contact are the three main routes via which humans are exposed to sedimentary HMs [135]. Coastal sediments, on the other hand, are found at the land–sea interface and interchange with coastal waters. Hence, the dosage from sedimentary inhalation was not computed. As a result, in this study, we measured the indices linked to sediment based on two main paths to determine risk assessment: ingestion and dermal contact [20,136].
Human health risk assessment (HHRA) of topsoils is generally utilized to measure non-carcinogenic risk (NCR) to humans using three exposure pathways namely ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact. The HHRA technique was based on the US Environmental Protection Agency’s recommendations and the Exposure Factors Handbook [135,137,138,139]. For both children and adults, average daily doses (ADDs) (mg/kg day) of HMs were determined through ingestion (ADDing), and dermal contact (ADDder) by using Equations (4)–(5) as shown below:
ADD ing = C sediment IngR × EF × ED BW × AT × 10 6
ADD der = C sediment SA × AF × ABS × EF × ED BW × AT × 10 6
where ADDing, and ADDder is the daily amount of exposure to metals (mg/kg day) through ingestion, and dermal contact, respectively. In this study, the NCR of HMs was assessed by using the hazard quotient (HQ) and hazard index (HI) [140,141]. The definition, exposure factors, and reference values used to estimate the intake values and health risks of HMs in topsoils collected from Peninsular Malaysia are presented in Table 3.
The HQ is the ratio of a metal’s ADD to its reference dose (RfD) for exposure pathways that are identical [137]. The RfD (mg/kg day) is the maximum daily dosage of metal from a certain exposure pathway that is considered as not posing a significant risk of detrimental consequences to sensitive individuals throughout their lives, including both children and adults. For Cu, the RfD (mg/kg day) values used in the present study were 4.00 × 10−2, and 1.20 × 10−2 for ingestion, and dermal contact, respectively. For Pb, the RfD (mg/kg day) values used in the present study were 3.50 × 10−3, and 5.25 × 10−4 for ingestion, and dermal contact, respectively. For Zn, the RfD (mg/kg day) values used in the present study were 3.00× 10−1, and 6.00 × 10−2 for ingestion, and dermal contact, respectively [141]. If the ADD was less than the RfD value (HQ 1), no adverse health impacts were expected, but if the ADD was greater than the RfD value (HQ > 1), there were likely to be harmful health impacts [137,139].
Hazard index (HI), which is the sum of the HQs in the two exposure paths, determines the NCR. [144,145,146]. A HI of < 1.0 was expected to show that there was no significant risk of non-carcinogenic effects. A HI of > 1.0 was expected to show that there was a possible occurrence of non-carcinogenic effects. The probability of non-carcinogenic effects has a positive connection with the increment of HI value [147]. The HI is calculated following Equation (6).
HI = HQ i = ADD i RfD i

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Heavy Metals in Sediments

The concentrations of Cu, Pb, and Zn reported from the ASEAN-5 countries as obtained from the literature are presented in Table 2. Based on 176 reports from 113 publications, the ranges of concentrations (mg/kg dry weight) were 0.09–3080 for Cu, 0.37–4950 for Zn, and 0.07–2666 for Pb.
The overall descriptive statistics of HM concentrations (mg/kg dry weight) in the aquatic sediments of the ASEAN-5 countries are presented in Table 4. For comparison, the distribution levels of Cu, Pb, and Zn reported from the ASEAN-5 countries are presented in Figure 2. The natural background levels of UCC by Wedepohl [35] for the metal distributions followed: Zn > Cu > Pb. From Table 4, the mean values of the three metals in Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam followed: Zn > Pb > Cu. However, Malaysia followed: Zn > Cu > Pb, while the Philippines followed: Cu > Zn > Pb. Overall, the probabilities of the percentages in Figure 3 indicated the overall metal distribution followed: Zn > Pb > Cu.
Therefore, the above metal distributions from Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, and the Philippines did not follow the UCC metal distribution by Wedepohl [35]. This indicated metal redistributions of the natural abundances of Cu, Pb, and Zn. This could be attributed to anthropogenic inputs of elevated Cu levels in the Philippines (mean: 57.8; 3.85 times higher than the Pb UCC level), and the elevated levels of Pb in Indonesia (Semarang, 2666; Jakarta Bay, 438), Thailand (Ao Ban Don and Pattani Bay; 424) and Vietnam (Rivers in Hanoi and Paddy field near Red River Delta, 361 and 340, respectively) (Table 2).
When compared to the concentrations of Cu, Pb, and Zn based on sediment quality guidelines and reference values (Table S1), the overall mean values of Cd, Pb, and Zn of the ASEAN-5 countries were all above those of the eight reference values.

3.2. Potential Ecological Risk Index

Based on 176 reports of the ASEAN-5 countries, the values of Cf, ER, and PERI calculated for the present study based on the cited concentrations of Cu, Pb, and Zn are presented in Table S2.
The overall ranges of concentrations, ER, and PERI of Cu, Pb, and Zn from the ASEAN-5 countries are presented in Figure 1. The ER values ranged from 0.02–1077 for Cu, 0.01–95.2 for Zn, and 0.02–784 for Pb (Table 1). The overall statistics of values (mean and maximum) of the concentrations of Cu, Zn, and Pb, and their ER and PERI from the present study are presented in Figure 2.
Almost all Cu ER values (97.7%) showed similar ranges of the above two categories except for a few reports. The highest Cu level (3080 mg/kg dry weight) was reported from a mine-tailing spill in Marinduque Island, Philippines, with ‘very high ecological risk’. In addition, drainage sediments in the western part of Peninsular Malaysia were categorized as Cu ‘high potential ecological risk’.
Almost all reports (96%) showed Pb ER were categorized as between ‘low potential ecological risk’ and ‘moderate potential ecological risk’ except for a few reports. Six reports showed Pb ER of ‘considerable potential ecological risk’, while one report from Semarang (Indonesia) showed Pb ER as ‘very high ecological risk’ (Pb level as 2666 mg/kg dry weight). All reports (100%) showed Zn ER were categorized as between ‘low potential ecological risk’ and ‘‘considerable potential ecological risk’.
Based on the country, the overall statistics of values of concentrations (mg/kg dry weight) of Cu, Zn, and Pb, and their Cf and ER from the present study are presented in Table 4.

3.3. Human Health Risk Assessment

The HHRA results due to Cu, Pb, and Zn exposures of sediments from the ASEAN-5 countries are presented in Tables S3–S5, respectively. Tables S3–S5 are based on 176 reports of the ASEAN-5 countries, showing the values of hazard quotient ingestion (HQing), hazard quotient dermal (HQdermal), and HI of Cu, Pb, and Zn for children and adults from the present study. The overall statistics of values of HQing, HQdermal, and HI of Cu, Pb, and Zn for children and adults from the present study are presented in Table 5.
It was found that all the NCR values showed HI values < 1.0 for Cu, Pb, and Zn. These values represented no NCR for the ingestion and dermal contact routes for sediments from the ASEAN-5 countries.

3.3.1. Copper

For children Cu (S3), based on the mean values of the ASEAN-5 countries, the HQing values ranged from 2.95E-05 to 1.01, and the HQdermal values ranged from 1.57 × 10−7 to 5.38 × 10−3. The HI values for children Cu ranged from 2.97 × 10−5 to 1.01. For adult Cu (S3), based on the mean values of the ASEAN-5 countries, the HQing values ranged from 3.96 × 10−6 to 1.35 × 10−1, and the HQdermal values ranged from 4.02 × 10−7 to 1.37 × 10−2. The HI values for adult Cu ranged from 4.36 × 10−6 to 1.49 × 10−1. The Cu values of HQing and HQder were higher in children than those in adults. Except for one report, the Cu HI values for both children and adults were lower than 1 in all the reports, indicating limited non-carcinogenic risk from Cu in the ASEAN-5 countries. The only Cu HQing value > 1.0 was found in the Philippines (S5) at a mine-tailing spill on Marinduque Island (3080 mg/kg dry weight).
Cu has an average concentration of 50 parts per million in the earth’s crust. It is used in a variety of industrial and agricultural operations, and it can be discharged into the environment through a variety of sources, including mining, metal pipe, chemical manufacturing, and pesticide manufacturing [148,149]. Copper compounds are frequently employed in industrial and agricultural activities. As a result, increased Cu concentrations have been detected in some biosphere zones [150].
Though some HMs, such as Cu and Zn, are required by our bodies, large concentrations of these metals can be harmful [148,151]. Copper is also required for the formation of hemoglobin and plays an important role in enzymatic reactions. Copper plays a role in animal metabolism as well. However, excessive intake might be harmful to one’s health. Excessive Cu consumption poses major risks, including elevated blood pressure and respiration rates, kidney and liver damage, convulsions, cramps, vomiting, and even death [148].

3.3.2. Lead (Pb)

For children, Pb (S4), based on the mean values of the ASEAN-5 countries, the HQing values ranged from 2.59 × 10−4 to 9.87, and the HQdermal values ranged from 2.80 × 10−6 to 1.07 × 10−1. The HI values for children Pb ranged from 2.62 × 10−4 to 9.98. For adult Pb (S4), based on the mean values of the ASEAN-5 countries, the HQing values ranged from 3.48 × 10−5 to 1.32, and the HQdermal values ranged from 7.14 × 10−6 to 2.72 × 10−1. The HI values for adult Pb ranged from 4.19 × 10−5 to 1.60. The Pb values of HQing and HQder were higher in children than those in adults. Except for 10 reports from four countries, the Pb HI values for both children and adults were lower than 1 in all the other reports, indicating limited non-carcinogenic risk from Pb in the ASEAN-5 countries. The Pb HQing values > 1.0 were from three reports (S3, S7, and S24) from Indonesia, three reports (S2, S3, and S17) from Thailand, two reports (S2 and S3) from Vietnam, and two reports (S21 and S23) from Malaysia.
Han et al. [152] conducted a bibliometric analysis of HM health risks and impacts to obtain an overview of HM health risk levels, sources, and control strategies in diverse regions throughout the world from 1989 to 2018. Over the last 10 years, there has been a considerable increase in concern about HM dangers and repercussions, particularly in China and other developing countries, according to the findings.
Pb is a naturally occurring metal with a concentration of 15–20 mg/kg in the earth’s crust [153]. Lead (Pb) is a very toxic HM that is non-biodegradable and rapidly accumulates in the human body [154]. It harms blood circulation, the central nervous system, the liver, and the kidneys in humans [154]. Paint, pesticides, smoking car emissions, coal burning, and mining are all sources of Pb contamination in the ecosystem. Lead is utilized in a variety of products, including batteries, ammunition, metal items like solder and pipes, and X-ray shielding devices, all of which cause health concerns [154]. Pb exposure has a major public health impact in developing countries, but only a few of these nations have implemented laws and legislation to effectively fight the problem [155].
Pb-related intellectual deficiencies have been documented at blood lead levels considerably below 10 g/dL in an international pooled investigation, which is likely to be of greatest concern to children under the age of 10. In the case of adults, several credible population studies have found a link between blood Pb and death risk [156].

3.3.3. Zinc

For children, Zn (S5) based on the mean values of the ASEAN-5 countries, the HQing values ranged from 1.62 × 10−5 to 2.16 × 10−1, and the HQdermal values ranged from 1.29 × 10−7 to 1.73 × 10−3. The HI values for children Zn ranged from 1.63 × 10−5 to 2.18 × 10−1. For adult Zn (S5), based on the mean values of the ASEAN-5 countries, the HQing values ranged from 2.17 × 10−6 to 2.90 × 10−2, and the HQdermal values ranged from 3.30 × 10−7 to 4.42 × 10−3. The HI values for adult Zn ranged from 2.50 × 10−6 to 3.34 × 10−2. The Zn values of HQing and HQder were higher in children than those in adults. All the Zn Pb HI values for both children and adults were lower than 1 in all the reports, indicating limited non-carcinogenic risk from Zn in the ASEAN-5 countries.
Many biochemical processes and physiological activities of living tissues are regulated by zinc. Excess Zn causes a variety of health issues, including stomach sickness, skin irritations, cramping, vomiting, and anaemia [151]. Brass plating, wood pulp manufacturing, ground and newsprint paper manufacture, steelworks with galvanizing lines, and Zn and brass metal works are examples of human activities and industrial sources of Zn. In various waste streams mentioned in the literature, Zn contents ranged from less than 1 to more than 48,000 mg/L. Sediment entrainment, agricultural operations, groundwater intrusion, or a combination of these sources release Zn into the environment [151].

3.4. Exposure Behaviors of Heavy Metals

For Cu (Table S3), in children, the percentages of HQing to HI were 99.47% while HQdermal to HI was 0.53%. In adults, the percentages of HQing to HI were 90.8% while HQdermal to HI was 9.21%. For Pb (Table S4), in children, the percentages of HQing to HI were 99.9% while HQdermal to HI was 0.10%. In adults, the percentages of HQing to HI were 83.0% while HQdermal to HI was 17.0%. For Zn (Table S5), in children, the percentages of HQing to HI were 99.2%, while HQdermal to HI was 0.79%. In adults, the percentages of HQing to HI were 86.8% while HQdermal to HI was 13.2%.
It was shown that the two different exposure pathways of Cu, Pb, and Zn for children and adults diminished in the following order: ingestion > dermal contact. The contributions of HQing to HI (total risk of non-carcinogenic) were the highest for Pb (99.9%) for children, while the lowest was found in the Pb (83.0%) for adults. The contributions of HQdermal to HI (total risk of non-carcinogenic) were the highest for Pb (17.0%) for adults, while the lowest was found in the Pb (0.10%) for children. This emphatically showed that ingestion was the fundamental exposure pathway to undermine human health. Based on a report by Qing et al. [141] in Anshan, China. the highest Cd contribution (75.2%) to HI for adults was found in HQdermal.
Comparison of the HI values for children and adults, found that children had a higher risk of NCR from HMs in the ASEAN-5 countries’ sediments, which is consistent with what has been observed for the Red Sea countries [148]. If HI 1, the exposed population would not display obvious detrimental health impacts, according to the USEPA [136]. The child group was exposed to a higher risk of negative health outcomes due to the pollutants’ influence. According to the findings, cutaneous absorption of pollutants was the primary reason of the child group’s risk. The increase in non-carcinogenic health risk was closely proportional to the human body’s exposed skin areas. Children are more susceptible to environmental contaminants because of their behavior and physiology. Pica behavior and hand or finger sucking are common in children, resulting in a greater NCR than in adults. They exhibit increased hand-to-mouth activity, respiration rates, and gastrointestinal absorption of some drugs [157]. The literature [156,157] has shown that HMs lead to greater health concerns to children than to adults.

3.5. Thailand

Thirteen qualitative papers from Thailand were not included in the calculations of ERI and HHRA [11,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167]. The exclusions were mainly due to not all the three metals (Cu, Pb, and Zn) being analyzed and reported in these papers.

3.5.1. The Gulf of Thailand

Worakhunpiset [168] compiled the findings of investigations on trace element levels in marine sediments from Thailand’s Gulf. Unsustainable land-based pollution produced by population increase, urbanization, and industrialization along the coastline is the primary source of marine environmental deterioration in the Gulf of Thailand [168]. The maximum values of Pb and Zn in maritime sand were 79.8 mg/kg and 800 mg/kg, respectively, among all the tested values [169]. Geographical spatial and temporal variations in HM levels had been reported to be related to anthropogenic activities such as tourism, agriculture, urbanization, aquaculture, industry, and port operations [168].
Previously, Polprasert [164] reported that HM contamination in the Chao Phraya River estuary revealed substantial accumulations of Cd, Cu, Cr, and Pb in the water near the river mouth, which could have long-term effects on the aquatic environment through HM precipitation to the bottom sediments and HM bio-accumulation and bio-magnification in various food chains. Even though the Thai government has implemented laws and regulations aimed at pollution control, the Upper Gulf of Thailand’s environmental quality remains a source of contention, necessitating scientific investigations [169]. The Chao Phraya River carries significant volumes of domestic (from Bangkok’s 10 million residents), aquaculture (with total aquaculture output of 7105 t annually (DoF, 2017)), agricultural, and industrial wastes into the Gulf of Thailand, either partially treated or untreated (PCD, 2019).
Hungspreugs and Yuangthong [160] reported that sediment cores from the Chao Phraya River mouth region were enriched with Cd and Pb at the top end of the cores, with these layers corresponding to the dated sediment cores [170]. For Cr, Cu, and Zn, no enrichment was discovered. The light pollution stage near the upper Gulf of Thailand and the coastal region close to Songkhla Province had been reached due to anthropogenic activities, according to Liu et al. [60].
According to Wijaya et al. [62], the total levels of Pb (62.6 ppm), Zn (240 ppm), As (27.2 ppm), Fe (16,636 ppm), and Mn (419 ppm) in the Chao Phraya River sediments were higher than in the Sumida River, suggesting a strong anthropogenic impact in Bangkok. According to Windom et al. [166], sediment budgets suggested that only a small portion of the sediment supplied to the Upper Gulf by the major rivers was subsequently transferred to the Lower Gulf.
Mingkhwan and Worakhunpiset [55] measured the amounts of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Mn, Pb, and Zn in river and stream sediment collected in industrial estates in the Uthai and Bangpa-in Districts of Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya Province following the 2011 floods. They found that metal levels in sediment and fish samples were within the published guidelines. Strong metal-enriched concentrations (Hg, Cd, Zn, Ni, and Pb) were found in sediments of the Chao Phraya River Mouth between 2017 and 2019, according to Asokbunyarat and Sirivithayapakorn [157]. The elevated levels of HMs in sediments of the Chao Phraya River Mouth might be caused by weathering of rocks, sediment transport, and deposition within the Chao Phraya River Basin. This was due to the high freshwater inflow and discharge of low concentrations of HMs in processed industrial effluent to the Chao Phraya River.

3.5.2. Other Rivers and Aquatic Ecosystems

HMs were discovered in the Mae Klong river’s coastal system and estuarine zone by Censi et al. [158]. They discovered a lithogenic component that influences the composition of coastal waters and suspended particles. Pengthamkeerati et al. investigated the status and seasonal change of HMs in surface sediment at Don Hoi Lot, a site in the Mae Klong estuary (2013). All the HMs detected in the sediments showed lower quantities than in the other surrounding estuaries, except for Zn.
Cheevaporn et al. [159] proposed that diagenetic remobilization and release of these metals from the sediments of the Bang Pakong River Estuary into the overlying water might lead to their subsequent redeposition into the sediments. The accumulation of HMs in the coastal sediments along with Chonburi to Pattaya, Chonburi Province, showed no major hazards, according to Khuntong et al. [161]. The levels of certain HMs in stream sediments from the middle part of the Songkhla Lake Basin were mainly controlled by anthropogenic activities, according to Ladachart et al. [162], and did not exceed the Dutch standard values.
Potipat et al. [58] revealed that the coastal area of Chanthaburi Province was unpolluted and not enriched by HMs (Pb, Cd, Ca, Fe, Cu, and Zn). Pb was found at high concentrations of 386 and 557 mg/kg in the dockyard and Pattani River-mouth sampling sites, respectively, according to Sowana et al. [165]. These findings revealed that using coastal lands without proper planning and management had negative impacts on the soil, especially in terms of sediment contamination.

3.6. Vietnam

Fourteen papers from Vietnam were not included in the calculations of ER and HHRA [23,25,27,68,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180]. The exclusions were mainly due to not all the three metals (Cu, Pb, and Zn) being analyzed and reported in these papers.

3.6.1. Northern Vietnam

In Hanoi, Vietnam, industrial and urban wastewater is dumped directly into rivers. Ho and Egashira [63] found that total HM concentrations ranged from background levels to over the maximum permissible levels to crop growth in sediments collected from different sites along three rivers in Hanoi City’s developed and densely populated area. They concluded that total HM concentrations were site-specific and appeared to be higher in areas with manufacturing companies.
The sediments of two rivers in Hanoi City (To Lich and Kim Nguu rivers) were extensively polluted with HMs, according to Huong et al. [27]. The sort of manufacturing plants placed along the rivers was directly tied to the high HM levels. As these two rivers are the primary supply of irrigation water for suburban agricultural land and feed water for fish farming ponds, this has sparked popular outrage. Ho et al. [181] investigated the speciation and mobility of As, Cu, Mn, Pb, and Zn in sediments at the Cam River mouth as a function of depth. They discovered that sediment-bound Pb and Mn dominated in the reducible and acid-soluble fractions, respectively, while Cu and Zn were fairly uniformly distributed across the four extracted fractions.
In the largest estuary ecosystem in northern Vietnam, Thinh et al. [179] found higher concentrations of As and HMs in river sediments and top-layers of mangrove forest soil cores in varied land uses. They speculated that increased harmful metal levels in the ecosystem could be the result of extensive human activities upstream of the Red River in recent decades.
Ho et al. [66] found that HM (containing Cu, Pb, and Zn) levels grew fast by two times or more in the Cam River mouth (Haiphong Province) from 1954 to 1975, then remained essentially steady from 1975 to 2008. The contamination of the Cam River mouth by HMs and As was largely due to anthropogenic operations in Haiphong Harbor and industrial zone. Nguyen and Volkova [173] discovered that 1.76–16.3 percent of the flow of HMs accumulated throughout the year in the Red River Delta, with the highest accumulation rates for Pb, Fe, and Zn. Nguyen et al. [69] found that at the upstream of the Red River, the enrichment factors of Cu, Cd, Pb, Ni, and Zn in sediments were significantly higher. Cu and Pb were found to be among the most prevalent contaminants in the Red River, with quantities ranging from moderate to severe pollution levels.
In the Red River Delta, Phuong et al. [28] found Cu, Pb, and Zn levels in the surface layer of a paddy field near a Cu casting village’s wastewater channel exceeded the limits allowed for Vietnamese agricultural soils. Near a fertilizer facility and an industrial zone, they found high levels of Zn collected in the surface soil of rice fields.
Hoai et al. [70] discovered that the concentrations of HMs (Cu, Zn, Pb, As, and Cd) in the sediments of tidal flats in northern Vietnam (Quang Ninh to Ninh Binh) provinces increased over time. Cu, Pb, and As concentrations in sediments from the center to the south surpassed the ISQG standards. The impacts of land-ocean interaction mechanisms and human activities were responsible for these findings.

3.6.2. Halong Bay

In Halong Bay, Dang Hoai et al. [71] reported that the concentrations of Cu, Pb, and As were higher than the levels in the Interim Sediment Quality Guide (ISQG) of the coastal site, but lower than the levels in the ISQG of the marine site. This was because the area around the bay attracted several economic activities. The development of coal mining, shipping, aquaculture, and tourism, has led the region’s economy to develop rapidly [71,182].
Only As was of concern among the HMs examined, according to Ho et al. [181], while Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn appeared to represent their background concentrations in Cua Ong Habor sediments (Ha Long Bay). This is because natural processes including weathering and bedrock erosion are the primary sources of HMs in the sediments near Cua Ong Harbor. Ho et al. [67] discovered that HMs were derived from natural bio/geochemical processes and had low potential mobilities in the Cua Luc Estuary and Ha Long Bay. Thanh-Nho et al. [177] proposed that most HMs in the Can Gio Mangrove were of natural origins, accumulated in the mangrove primarily as oxyhydroxides originating from upstream lateritic soils. This was supported by the high proportion of metals in the residual fraction of HMs (>50%).

3.6.3. Central Vietnam

There was a scarcity of published data on total metal levels in coastal sediments from Central Vietnam, especially Khanh Hoa province. Romano et al. [15] found that the levels of Li, Mn, Ni, V, Pb, Cr, Zn As, Cd, U, and Hg in sediments from the coastal lagoons Thuy Trieu and Dam Nai were higher than the calculated metal levels. The HMs in water and sediment samples collected from the Cai River estuary and Nha Trang Bay in 2010 at eight locations along the salinity gradient (ranging from 0–36 ppt) were recorded by Koukina et al. [16]. However, there was no mention of HM contamination.
In 2008, sediment cores were taken from nine central Vietnamese coastal lagoons (Lang Co, Truong Giang, An Khe, Nuoc Man, Nuoc Ngot, Thi Nai, O Loan, Thuy Trieu, and Dam Nai). The metals (Al, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Li, Mn, Ni, Pb, V, U, and Zn) were generally low, according to Romano et al. [15], except for As, which often exceeded ERL standards. They concluded that the character of rocks and soils in the watersheds influenced the metal concentrations in the lagoon sediments.

3.6.4. Southern Vietnam

Costa-Böddeker et al. [25] found that total HM levels in the Thi Vai Estuary and the Can Gio Mangrove Forest were lower than expected for this heavily industrialized location. Costa-Böddeker et al. [183] discovered that upstream Ni levels were above the likely impact level (PEL), indicating a possibility of unfavorable biological impacts. However, when past land-use impacts were taken into account (such as untreated wastewater discharge, intensive agricultural activities, tanning operations, and so on), pollutant concentrations in the Thi Vai Estuary were lower than expected, owing to dilution by high sedimentation rates and tidal hydrodynamics [25,183].
Costa-Böddeker et al. [171] discovered that Cr and Cu were over the threshold effect levels (TEL), whereas Ni was above the probable effects level (PEL), indicating the possibility of detrimental biological consequences. Point sources (recent industrialization and land-use changes), air pollution, and erosion were identified as the key causes of the increased HM level. Dung et al. [26] previously found minimal Cr, Cu, and Pb contamination in the Can Gio district. Under acidification, the risk of Mn, Zn, and Ni was estimated to be medium to extremely high. Thanh-Nho et al. [177] found that trace metal concentrations in the dissolved and particulate phases at flood tides in the Can Gio mangrove were in the same range as those recorded in the Can Gio Estuary.
Although the metropolitan region was highlighted as the major contributor for metal(oid) emissions, Strady et al. [176] revealed that the levels of metal contamination along the Saigon River looked to be moderate according to Vietnamese and WHO guidelines. This was due to the effects of wastewater and industrial discharges besides the water geochemistry along the river continuum. Later, Nguyen et al. [175] stated that the concentrations of 11 metals and metalloids in the sediment of the Saigon River varied with season and space and that three primary pollution sources namely from the Saigon River basin, inside Ho Chi Minh City, and the lowland contributed to enriching the HMs in the River sediment.
Only one area with relatively significant Cu enrichment was found in the seagrass beds off the coast of Khanh Hoa, according to Nguyen et al. [174]. Cu readings at My Giang and Pb values at Thuy Trieu, in particular, were in the intermediate risk category. As a result, two of the eight areas could be exposed to elevated Cu and Pb levels. In the southern coast, Tu et al. [180] reported that HMs (Cd, Pb, Hg, and As) levels in all samples were lower than the Vietnamese regulation levels and the probable effect levels in the CCME guideline.

3.7. Indonesia

Twenty-six papers from Indonesia were not included in the calculations of ERI and HHRA [184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208]. The exclusions were mainly due to not all the three metals (Cu, Pb, and Zn) being analyzed and reported in these papers.
Based on the publications between 1986 and 2008, Arifin et al. [209] summarized that toxic HMs were one of the widespread contaminants in Indonesian coastal waters.

3.7.1. Jakarta Bay

Hosono et al. [49] investigated the 210Pb geochronology, HM concentrations (Zn, Cu, and Pb), and stable Pb isotope ratios (206Pb/207Pb) of three sediment cores taken from Jakarta Bay from 1900 to 2006 to unravel the history of HM contamination. They discovered that anthropogenic metal deposition in the sediments began in the 1920s and increased dramatically from the 1970s until the end of the 1990s, based on chemical and isotopic investigations. Zn and Pb accumulation rates in the coastal industrialised region were steady or declined from the end of the 1990s to 2006, while HM pollution is still a major problem in terms of environmental preservation and protection in Jakarta Bay. Williams et al. [44] found increased levels of Zn, Pb, Cu, and Ni in the Jakarta City Harbor, particularly in the center of the bay and to the east and west of the harbor, near to the bay’s shoreline. The geographic patterns of HMs were consistent with a prior investigation that showed substantially greater Pb and Zn concentrations in the eastern section of Jakarta Bay [44].
Anthropogenic causes affected Zn, Ni, Pb, and partly Cu, according to Sindern et al. [50], primarily in central Jakarta City. The data showed a wide range of local emission sources, including metal industry, fertilizers, and untreated animal feces, and street dust. Riani et al. [199] aimed to examine the effect of HM pollution on green mussels cultured in Muara Kamal Waters, Jakarta Bay over seven months. Their results showed that the HM concentrations in the sediment exceeded the quality standard at Muara Kamal.

3.7.2. Java

In the Garang (Central Java) watershed, Haeruddin et al. [195] assessed the HM concentrations in the sediments and traced the distribution. Pb was found to have the highest concentration, followed by Cr and Cu, although Cd and Zn were found to be below detection limits. The Kreo River has the highest Pb values and the Banjir Kanal Barat River had the lowest. The Garang River had the greatest Cu contents, whereas the Kreo River had the lowest. According to the sediment pollution index, the sediments of the Garang watershed were not contaminated by HMs.
Isworo and Oetari [51] reported that the HM concentrations in the sediment collected from marine waters of Tanjung Jati Jepara (Central Java province) had values that were below the standards. But this could allow the process of HM biomagnification dam to occur, which, if continued in the long run, might be hazardous to marine ecosystems and the health of nearby communities. Widianarko et al. [43] measured the concentrations of Cd, Pb, Cu, and Zn in Semarang’s coastal urban sediments (Central Java). From 101 sites evaluated in the larger Semarang area, 51 were unpolluted, 36 were mildly polluted, 9 were polluted, and 5 were extremely polluted, according to this classification. Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cd contents in coastal silt in Usman Janatin Street (Semarang) were determined by Almiqrh et al. [184].
The levels of eight HMs (Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Ti, V, and Zn) in surface sediments from Segara Anakan Nature Reserve (SANR), a mangrove-fringed lagoon in the Cilacap coastal area, were determined by Syakti et al. [202]. Cr, Ni, and Zn concentrations identified in SANR sediments might induce harmful effects to occur throughout a wider variety of species in refinery site stations, according to the evaluation.
Sudarningsih et al. [201] collected sediment samples from Citarum River (West Java Province). They assessed the usefulness of magnetic methods in detecting HM pollution in the sediment samples. According to geochemical tests, all water and sediment samples contained Fe, Cd, Co, Ni, Pb, Zn, As, Hg, and Mn. Although there was a negative link between HM concentration and magnetic parameters, the HM levels varied sporadically in sediment samples.
Lestari et al. [197] collected surface sediment samples from 27 sites in Cirebon coastal waters (West Java) in April 2017. They determined metal fractionation to evaluate bioavailability in sediments from Cirebon coastal waters. The results showed that the metals Cu, Ni, and Zn originated from anthropogenic sources.
Based on the sediments collected from Bomo coastal water (East Java) in July 2018, Dewi et al. [190] showed that there was no significant difference between Pb, Cd, and Hg concentrations at all sites (p > 0,05). Furthermore, in general, concentrations of all HM had exceeded the quality standards for marine biota.
During the spring and neap tidal periods in Popoh Bay, Yona et al. (2018a) tested varying amounts of Pb and Cd in the water and sediment (Tulungagung, southern part of Java Island). Due to the higher input of Pb from oil pollution by boats and fishing operations, the concentration of Pb was higher than the concentration of Cd in both spring and neap tides. Water movement during spring and neap tides had a substantial effect on the HM distribution, according to their research. Yona et al. [207] investigated the geographic distribution of HM in four coastal locations in southern Pacific Pacitan (South Java). Pb and Hg levels were found to be significantly higher in Pantai Soge, while Cd levels were considerably higher in Pantai Pancer. Overall, HM concentrations in the research areas were modest; nevertheless, significant activities in the coastal areas of southern Pacitan could contribute to HM pollution, necessitating attention.
Harmesa and Cordova [193] evaluated the state of the Dasun estuary (Central Java) based on the accumulation of Cr, Cd, and Pb in sediments. Even though the concentration of Cd was rather high and was thought to originate from batik industry waste, the Dasun estuary was confirmed to be safe for the living habitat. Lestari et al. [196] collected Cu, Ni, and Zn from 25 typical sites in Banten Bay (West Java) in April 2016. The percentages of Cu, Ni, and Zn were primarily deposited in the residual fraction of overall concentrations, according to the results.

3.7.3. Sumatra

Irzon et al. [194] investigated the HM concentrations in six tin tailings and two soils from Singkep Island concerning environmental risk. They found higher environmental problems in the sediments collected from the primary wastes.
The contents of Zn and Pb in surface sediments collected from 23 monitoring locations in Dumai coastal waters were determined by Amin et al. [210]. The resistant fraction dominated metal concentrations at 87% and 74% for Zn and Pb, respectively. They found anthropogenic Pb imports occurred in more sampling sites. This could be due to a mixture of factors, such as a big population, untreated home, and industrial waste discharges, shipping activities, and city run-off. The amounts of Cd, Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, and Fe in Dumai coastal waters were comparable to other locations of the world, according to Amin et al. [19].
Amin et al. [52] showed that the distribution of HM concentrations in seawater and sediment on Kundur Island’s northwest coast followed virtually identical trends, with higher concentrations recorded in stations adjacent to mining activities. The PERI result suggested that the tested area was still at low ecological risk due to nearby mining operations. Karina et al. [195] analyzed the Mn, Pb, Cu, and Cd levels in fluvial sediments affected by coal spill water in Lampuuk, Aceh Province, collected in December 2018. They found that Pb content in the sediment was still under the threshold.

3.7.4. Sulawesi

During the wet and dry seasons, Najamuddin et al. [198] measured Pb and Zn concentrations in surface sediments at 17 stations in riverine, estuarine, and marine settings in the estuary of the Jeneberang River (South Sulawesi). They discovered that HM concentrations were affected by the season and that Pb and Zn came primarily from rivers and natural sources.
Samawi et al. [200] collected sediments from four estuarine waters from the west coast of South Sulawesi and analyzed them for Pb, Cd, and Cu. This study showed that the bioavailability of HMs Pb, Cd, and Cu in the estuary waters from the west coast of South Sulawesi was considered low. The bioavailability of HMs in sediments was as follows: Cd > Pb > Cu.
Tongggiroh et al. [205] investigated the origin, level, and distribution of HMs in coastal sediments of Parepare Bay (South Sulawesi), which is home to a harbor, tourism, and a landfill. They discovered that the concentration of various non-earth sources resulted in an enrichment factor (EF) of Pb > 1. Armid et al. [186] studied HM pollution in the surface sediments of Kendari Bay (Southeast Sulawesi), suggesting that the Kendari Bay surface sediment was regarded as an unpolluted area by HMs such as Cu and Zn). According to Asaf et al. [187], the metal concentration in the coastal sections of Sangihe Island (Talengan Bay, Manalu, and Dagho Bay; North Sulawesi) was below the background value. Cu, Pb, and Zn levels in Makassar’s coastal water showed that it was still unpolluted, according to Bohari and Palutturi [188].

3.7.5. Other Coastal Waters

Tanjung et al. [204] collected sand samples from six locations along the coast of Mimika Regency (one of Papua Province’s regencies) and analyzed them for HMs. The coastal waters of Mimika Regency were classified as low pollution and of low potential ER. As a result, Pb, Cu, Cd, and Hg were not found in the coastal waters of the Mimika Regency.

3.8. Malaysia

Seventeen papers from Malaysia were not included in the calculations of ERI and HHRA [6,90,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225]. The exclusions were mainly due to not all the three metals (Cu, Pb, and Zn) being analyzed and reported in these papers.
Shazili et al. [220] summarized the sources of HM pollution in Malaysia, stating that they came from manufacturing, agricultural, sewage, and motor vehicle emissions. Pb and Zn contaminations were found in the Juru and Langat river sediments. The concentrations of Zn and Pb in coastal sediments off Juru, Penang, and in the Johor Straits were two and three times greater than the global shale values, according to the researchers. The usage of leaded gasoline was assumed to be the source of Pb contamination. Metal concentrations in sediments from the Malacca Straits and the South China Sea were similar to those found in worldwide shale. Salam et al. [113] found that Pb, Zn, and Cu in the Perak River came primarily from natural sources, with minimal input from human activity.
A recent review by Yunus et al. [226] revealed the different concentrations of pollutants categorized as (1) low, (2) moderately, and (3) chronically contaminated areas from HMs. From publications between 2000 and 2020, the anthropogenic inputs of HMs into the coastal environment of Peninsular Malaysia have shown a continuously increasing trend and these pollution studies are increasing yearly. However, there are valid reasons to suspect increasing amounts of HMs in the coastal sediments based on earlier speculations by Ismail et al. [96]. Due to increasing and rapid industrialization and urbanization, negative impacts have been afflicted on the health of the aquatic system.

3.8.1. West Coast of Peninsular Malaysia

The west coast of Peninsular Malaysia (PM) is more populous than the east coast of PM and East Malaysia. Khodami et al. (2017) reported the PERI of HMs indicated that the Bayan Lepas Free Industrial Zone of Penang was at low risk. Earlier, due to ocean disposal and land reclamation, Sivalingam (1984) reported the daily input of Cu, Pb, and Zn as 3.44 × 102 (kg/day), 1.29 × 104 kg/day, and 2.46 × 103 kg/day, respectively, into the marine ecosystem of the Western Channel by the Penang sewage ocean outfall. It was evident that the input of all these metals was very high. As the Western, North, and South Channels are flushed only by diurnal currents then ‘these metals are presumably being deposited in the sediments and so potentially assimilated within the marine food web.
Pb concentrations in the coast of Tanjung Karang (Selangor) and off Juru (Penang), according to Wood et al. [115], suggested some enrichment above the natural world value (in shale). Idriss and Ahmad [223] studied Cu, Cd, and Pb from the Juru River, Penang, Malaysia. Yusoff et al. [128] studied the HM contents in copepods, waters, and sediments from the unpolluted Gula estuary, and the polluted Juru estuary, off an industrial area in Penang. Malaysia. They found that the copepods and sediments from the Juru estuary contained significantly higher (p < 0.05) concentrations of Zn, Cu, Pb, and Cd compared to those from the Gula estuary. Redzwan et al. [77] found that quantitative evaluation using the HM enrichment factor was within the degree of background concentration in mangrove areas in Negeri Sembilan, Melaka, and Pahang.
Abubakar et al. [114] reported there were elevated concentrations of Cd, Cu, Pb, Zn, and Ni in the sediments of the Sungai Puloh mangrove area. Pollution by HMs in Sungai Puloh was caused by both anthropogenic and natural activities. The main sources of HM contamination in Port Klang, according to Sany et al. [8,29], were industrial effluent and port activities. According to Shaari et al. [126], all metals, save Pb, fell into the category of deficiency to minor enrichment, based on the geographic distributions of eight HMs (Al, Fe, Mn, Zn, Pb, Cu, Co, and Cd) in surface sediments of the northern Straits of Malacca.
ELTurk et al. [227] studied the distribution, enrichment, and ER of HMs in the Kuala Selangor estuary. The findings indicated that Pb levels in sediment were as high as the background value, implying anthropogenic contamination. ELTurk et al. [125] found that Pb concentrations in mangrove silt in the Klang estuary be above the threshold effect level, while Cu posed a medium environmental risk.
Hamzan et al. [122] studied the sediments from Kapar, Sungai Puloh, Sementa, and North Port. They found that the overall HM concentrations in each sediment layer fluctuated. Haris and Aris [119] also studied the intertidal surface sediments collected from Port Klang. In Port Klang, the enrichment factor and the geo-accumulation index revealed anthropogenic enrichments of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn. Cu concentrations had also surpassed the Canadian Interim Marine Sediment Quality Guideline at two locations near a commercial jetty, marina, and shipyard.
As the Selangor River (Kampung Kuantan) is bordered by residential and industrial sectors, as well as by particular leisure activities, agriculture, and fishing, the sediments in all plots and at all depths were contaminated with HMs, according to Nyangon et al. [127].

3.8.2. East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia

Wang et al. [80] found that the surface sediments in the Kelantan River estuary and nearby shelf area were mostly clayey silt and that the total organic carbon content in sediments declined from the river to the shelf. Pb pollution was found in the surface sediments, while Cu and Zn levels showed unpolluted conditions. Natural weathering and erosion of rocks and soils in the watershed were thought to be the main sources of HM, which were enriched towards the river mouth.
Baruddin et al. [224] studied the bioavailability of sediment As, Cr, and Pb to the mangrove, Rhizophora mucronata in the Kelantan Delta, Malaysia. The majority of Pb (88.8%) was found in the residual geochemical fraction of the sediments. Based on samples collected from the Tanjung Lumpur mangrove forest, the computed enrichment factors (EF) found for Pb and Cu were judged to have anthropogenic inputs, according to Yunus et al. [222].
According to Shazili et al. [220], the HM levels were usually higher in the coastal sediments off Kuantan port (in the northern sector). This could be due to metal pollutants from land runoff through the Kuantan River estuary area, which was densely populated with oil and gas industries, a port, and urban neighborhoods. They discovered that the Northeast Monsoon affected the distribution of metals within the distinct HM fractions of sediment as well as shifting the sediments.
The enrichment factor along the Kelantan River was classified as highly considerable enrichment for Pb in nearshore areas, according to Pooveneswary et al. [82]. Ong et al. [78] found that the metal geochemistry of the surface sediments of Bidong Island (the South China Sea, East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia) was influenced by both natural and anthropogenic inputs to the watershed. Natural mechanisms were also shown to be more important than anthropogenic inputs in the concentration of metals, according to the researchers.
The influx of various rivers on the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia influences the nearshore areas there [126]. Weathering may cause those materials to degrade into a soluble form of Zn, which is then discharged into the aquatic environment [151]. Zn can be found in motor oil, grease, phosphate fertilizers, and sewage sludge, concrete, and undercoating [228].
The leachate from the Sabak beach waste area could also be a source of Cu in Kelantan waterways. The resulting leachate, which contained soluble Cu [229,230], could contaminate the coastal environment. These HMs could be carried downstream by the Kelantan River, which flows through densely populated urban areas like Tanah Merah and Kota Bharu.

3.8.3. The Straits of Johore

Wood et al. [92] found that Pb and Zn levels in the Johor Straits were three and two times higher than world shale values, respectively, at sample sites along the Malaysia-Singapore causeway, which saw a lot of traffic. Pb enrichment was most likely caused by the use of leaded gasoline and Zn from tyre wear [92]. Many studies have been conducted on the Straits of Johore using the green-lipped mussel as a biomonitor of HM bioavailability. The results showed that the eastern part of the Johore Causeway in the Straits of Johore recorded higher metal levels [231,232,233,234,235,236]. Yap et al. [236] discovered higher HM levels of bioavailability and contamination by Cu and Zn in the eastern part of the Johore Straits (which is divided into two parts by a causeway) than in the western section, with Kg. Pasir Puteh in the eastern section has the highest bioavailability and contamination by HMs. These results agreed with those reported in the sediments [93].

3.8.4. East Malaysia: Sabah and Sarawak

Tan et al. [225] studied the baseline HMs in the surface sediment of Marudu Bay. They showed that terrestrial organic materials dominated the C/N ratio of sediment in Marudu Bay. Except for Zn, which had greater concentrations in most sections of Marudu Bay, the HM values were equivalent to the baseline. In the riverine-mangrove environment of Kota Marudu, Aris et al. [85] assessed the quantity of metal buildup in sediment to identify possible pollution sources. Of the sediment cores from Marudu Bay (Kudat), Mamun et al. [217] found that the HM concentrations were mostly influenced by the weathering of sedimentary rocks and there was no significant influence by the weathered mafic and ultramafic rocks of the ophiolite sequence. Of the Mengkabong lagoon (Sabah), according to Praveena et al. [83], the Mengkabong mangrove sediments had background amounts of Cu and Zn and were unpolluted for Pb, based on the calculation of the geoaccumulation index.
Based on sample collection from beaches of Miri City (Sarawak), according to Nagarajan et al. [84], Cu and Zn levels were greater, indicating an external input rather than a natural process. Based on sediments collected from the Sadong river (Sarawak), Omorinoye et al. [218] reported that the EF values showed moderate to significant HM enrichment. Antonina et al. [212] examined surface sand samples from off the coasts of Sabah and Sarawak. They discovered that the values were higher, but that these were not necessarily due to human inputs, as high levels were also detected far from the coast. This could be due to particulate inflow from the Rajang River, as well as bottom sediment movement.

3.9. The Philippines

Six papers from the Philippines were not included in the calculations of ERI and HHRA [237,238,239,240,241,242]. The exclusions were mainly due to not all the three metals (Cu, Pb, and Zn) being analyzed and reported in the papers.
According to Japitana et al. [243], one of the water quality indicators that has to be importantly monitored is the amount of HMs, which can be detrimental to the aquatic environment of the Philippines and its human health when present at exceeding levels in water bodies classified as potable sources of water. Japitana et al. [243] aimed to identify the underlying challenges in monitoring HMs in the Philippines and to review the prospective tools and their integrations in the assessment, management, and rehabilitation of HMs that were most appropriate in the Philippine settings. The causes of HM contamination in Manila Bay ranged from natural abundance to pollution from non-point sources, such as home sewage, toxic industrial effluents from manufacturing and shipping activities, combustion emissions, mining operations, rubbish dump leachate, and runoff from chemical agriculture [133].
In a mine-tailing spill on the island of Marinduque, on 24 March 1996, David [132] found increased quantities (mg/kg dry weight) of Cu (706–3080), Pb (43–56), and Zn (131–276). Tailings sludge, which originated at the Marcopper Mine, poured down the Boac River abruptly and during later storm events.
Decena et al. [239] investigated HM contamination in the Mangonbangon River, a Tacloban City urban river. For Zn and Cu, the average enrichment factor indicated moderate and moderately severe enrichment, respectively; for Cu and Zn, the average contamination factor (Cf) indicated moderate contamination.
Elvira et al. [134] found that the HMs in the clay portions of the Laguna de Bay sediments had higher quantities. Based on a modified contamination rating, the sediments ranged from mildly contaminated to significantly contaminated. These findings demonstrated the need to take sediment compositions into account when assessing lake ecosystems. Of the Batan Bay in Aklan, Nillos et al. [240] reported the Cu was found to have the highest concentration (10.61–66.81 mg/kg dry weight) in the sediment. The Batan Bay sediments might be considered generally non-polluted concerning Cu, Pb, and Cd, Hence, these metals were not expected to cause adverse effects to aquatic organisms under normal conditions.
Prudente et al. [131] measured Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, Pb, Ni, Cd, and Co contents in surface and core sediments from Manila Bay, as well as surface sediments from inflowing rivers. On the surface, core profiles indicated significantly variable and enhanced Cu, Pb, and Zn contents, indicating recent human inputs.
The need for the creation and execution of adequate regulatory measures for the protection and restoration of the HM-laden river in Zambales was highlighted by Sazon and Migo [242]. Based on sediments collected from Luzon Island, which included Laguna Lake and five of its tributary rivers, Vicente-Beckett [130] found that the average total Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, Pb, Hg, and Cd contents suggested, in general, relatively low to moderate pollution.

4. Conclusions

As mentioned in the literature review, observations of HM contamination in the aquatic ecosystems of the ASEAN-5 nations had been undertaken using sediments for several years. Based on a review of the literature published from 1981 to February 2021, we found that the mean values of Cu, Pb, and Zn in the aquatic sediments of the ASEAN-5 countries were elevated and localized in high human activity sites in comparison to the earth’s upper continental crust and reference values for marine sediments. Based on 176 reports from 113 publications, the ranges of concentrations (mg/kg dry weight) were 0.09–3080 for Cu, 0.37–4950 for Zn, and 0.07–2666 for Pb. The ER values ranged from 0.02–1077 for Cu, 0.01–95.2 for Zn, and 0.02–784 for Pb. All reports (100%) showed the Zn ER values to be categorized as between ‘low potential ecological risk’ and ‘moderate potential ecological risk’. Almost all Cu ER values (98.3%) also showed similar ranges of the above two risk categories, except for a few reports. The highest Cu level (3080) was reported from a mine-tailing spill in Marinduque Island of the Philippines, with ‘very high ecological risk’. In addition, Semarang recorded Cu of ‘considerable potential ecological risk’ while polluted drainage sediments in the western part of Peninsular Malaysia were categorized as Cu ‘high potential ecological risk’. Almost all reports (96%) showed Pb ER values as being between ‘low potential ecological risk’ and ‘moderate potential ecological risk’ except for a few reports. A site in Semarang (Indonesia) showed Zn ER values to be ‘very high ecological risk’ (Pb level as 2666). Other reports that showed Pb values of ‘considerable potential ecological risk’ were one report (No. 24; Indonesia), two reports (No. 2 and 17; Thailand), two reports (No. 2 and 3; Vietnam), and one report (No. 21; west coast of Peninsular Malaysia). In terms of HHRA, all NCR values (HI values 1.0) for Cu, Pb, and Zn for ingestion and dermal contact routes for sediments from the ASEAN-5 countries exhibited no non-carcinogenic concern.
The current comparative ER and HHRA of Cu, Pb, and Zn would be valuable for the management and appropriate development of the area, as well as serve as a database for use in the future. The results of the study indicated that although the anthropogenic interventions to the aquatic ecosystems of the ASEAN-5 countries have not yet reached significant levels thus far regarding sediment contamination, it may be too late if swift and appropriate measures are not undertaken now for restricting future possible contamination.
This comprehensive evaluation is necessary to reveal the condition of the HM sink to surface sediment, allowing any changes in the concentration to be easily monitored and managed throughout the ASEAN-5 countries. It emphasizes the need of keeping the high diversity of mangroves to protect the coastal region’s health and productivity. The findings of HMs in sediments from studies conducted in the ASEAN-5 countries’ aquatic environments were highlighted in the review. The current review is significant not just in terms of aquatic animal health and management, but also provides a comparative basis for HMs. These findings could help raise awareness of the pollution-mitigation benefits that aquatic ecosystems naturally give, as well as provide data for future plans and regulations aimed at more sustainable development in these areas. Publications from the ASEAN-5 developing countries have risen fast too, possibly as a result of the growing concerns over severe HM pollution. The most common difficulties in the ASEAN-5 developing countries have been exposure route analyses and risk levels of public health noncarcinogenic concerns.
Human health hazards and impacts from HMs have become global concerns and researchers and managers are working to reduce human health risks caused by HM emissions and accumulation. We carried out this study from the perspectives of an historical literature review, research trends, and the growth of hot issues in the area. From this study, we found that the prevention and control of HMs’ human health concerns should be based on emission sources, exposure pathways, and receptor populations. Based on our review, we propose that the recent increasing trends warrant a need for further monitoring of HMs in the ASEAN-5 aquatic ecosystems.

Recommendations

(1)
Discharges from human activities and industry, which include processing plants, should be tightened up by upgraded regulatory standards. Regulation of anthropogenic sources should be prioritized to reduce HM emissions, improve mitigation and remediation measures in areas with high background concentrations, and minimize HM bioavailability and bioaccessibility to living organisms in various environmental compartments.
(2)
For the management of marine protected areas in the ASEAN-5 countries, better cooperation of research activities among key governmental and non-governmental agencies should be continuous and promoted with investments and allocations of research fundings across the countries. Not just for environmental and health reasons, but also as a resource conservation measure, reprocessing or recycling of wastes containing HMs should be prioritized.
(3)
In the future, it will be important to collect more HMs monitoring data to develop reliable inventories for not only the sediment but also for other environmental media in the ASEAN-5 countries. The intake of HM-contaminated commercial organisms that could potentially pose a significant risk to human health suggests that regular monitoring of HMs and emerging potentially toxic chemicals in the aquatic ecosystems should be highly advised.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology11010007/s1, Table S1: Concentrations (mg/kg dry weight) of Cu, Pb and Zn based on Sediment Quality Guidelines and reference values, Table S2: Values of concentration factors (Cf), ecological risk (ER), and potential ecological risk index (PERI) calculated from the present study based on the cited concentrations of Cu, Pb and Zn reported from ASEAN-5 countries, Table S3: Values of hazard quotient ingestion (HQing), hazard quotient dermal (HQdermal) and hazard index (HI) of Cu for children and adults from the present study, Table S4: Values of hazard quotient ingestion (HQing), hazard quotient dermal (HQdermal) and hazard index (HI) of Pb for children and adults from the present study, Table S5: Values of hazard quotient ingestion (HQing), hazard quotient dermal (HQdermal) and hazard index (HI) of Zn for children and adults from the present study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.K.Y. and K.A.A.-M.; methodology, validation, C.K.Y. and K.A.A.-M.; formal analysis, C.K.Y.; investigation, C.K.Y.; resources, K.A.A.-M.; data curation, C.K.Y.; writing—original draft preparation C.K.Y.; writing—review and editing, C.K.Y. and K.A.A.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank Koe Wei Wong for checking the citation numberings throughout the text by using Zotero.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook Database: Report for Selected Countries and Subjects. Available online: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2020/October/weo-report (accessed on 31 May 2021).
  2. Worldometer Population of South-Eastern Asia. Available online: https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/south-eastern-asia-population/ (accessed on 31 May 2021).
  3. UN Statistic Division. Table 3: Population by Sex, Rate of Population Increase, Surface Area and DensityUN; Demographic Yearbook; United Nations Statistics Division: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  4. CIA. The World Factbook; Central intelligence Agency: FairFax County, VA, USA, 2011.
  5. Chan, C.Y.; Tran, N.; Dao, D.C.; Sulser, T.B.; Phillips, M.J.; Batka, M.; Wiebe, K.; Preston, N. Fish to 2050 in the ASEAN Region; Working Paper; WorldFish and International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI): Penang, Malaysia; Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  6. Praveena, S.; Aris, A.Z.; Radojevic, M. Heavy Metals Dyanamics and Source In Intertidal Mangrove Sediment of Sabah, Borneo Island. EnvironmentAsia 2010, 3, 79–83. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ismail, A.; Ramli, R. Trace Metals in Sediments and Molluscs from an Estuary Receiving Pig Farms Effluent. Environ. Technol. 1997, 18, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sany, S.B.T.; Salleh, A.; Rezayi, M.; Saadati, N.; Narimany, L.; Tehrani, G.M. Distribution and Contamination of Heavy Metal in the Coastal Sediments of Port Klang, Selangor, Malaysia. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2013, 224, 1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Udechukwu, B.E.; Ismail, A.; Zulkifli, S.Z.; Omar, H. Distribution, Mobility, and Pollution Assessment of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn, and Fe in Intertidal Surface Sediments of Sg. Puloh Mangrove Estuary, Malaysia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 4242–4255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Zulkifli, S.Z.; Ismail, A.; Mohamat-Yusuff, F.; Arai, T.; Miyazaki, N. Johor Strait as a Hotspot for Trace Elements Contamination in Peninsular Malaysia. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2010, 84, 568–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kaewtubtim, P.; Meeinkuirt, W.; Seepom, S.; Pichtel, J. Heavy Metal Phytoremediation Potential of Plant Species in a Mangrove Ecosystem in Pattani Bay, Thailand. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2016, 14, 367–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kaewtubtim, P.; Meeinkuirt, W.; Seepom, S.; Pichtel, J. Occurrence of Heavy Metals and Radionuclides in Sediments and Seawater in Mangrove Ecosystems in Pattani Bay, Thailand. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 7630–7639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kaewtubtim, P.; Meeinkuirt, W.; Seepom, S.; Pichtel, J. Phytomanagement of Radionuclides and Heavy Metals in Mangrove Sediments of Pattani Bay, Thailand Using Avicennia Marina and Pluchea Indica. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 127, 320–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hosono, T.; Su, C.-C.; Siringan, F.; Amano, A.; Onodera, S. Effects of Environmental Regulations on Heavy Metal Pollution Decline in Core Sediments from Manila Bay. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2010, 60, 780–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Romano, S.; Mugnai, C.; Giuliani, S.; Turetta, C.; Cu, N.H.; Bellucci, L.G.; Nhon, D.H.; Capodaglio, G.; Frignani, M. Metals in Sediment Cores from Nine Coastal Lagoons in Central Vietnam. Am. J. Environ. Sci. 2012, 8, 130–142. [Google Scholar]
  16. Koukina, S.E.; Lobus, N.V.; Peresypkin, V.I.; Dara, O.M.; Smurov, A.V. Abundance, Distribution and Bioavailability of Major and Trace Elements in Surface Sediments from the Cai River Estuary and Nha Trang Bay (South China Sea, Vietnam). Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2017, 198, 450–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Effendi, H.; Kawaroe, M.; Lestari, D.F. Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Surface Sediment of Mahakam Delta, East Kalimantan. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2016, 33, 574–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Everaarts, J.M. Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb) in Sediment of the Java Sea, Estuarine and Coastal Areas of East Java and Some Deep-Sea Areas. Neth. J. Sea Res. 1989, 23, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Amin, B.; Ismail, A.; Arshad, A.; Yap, C.K.; Kamarudin, M.S. Anthropogenic Impacts on Heavy Metal Concentrations in the Coastal Sediments of Dumai, Indonesia. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2009, 148, 291–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Q.; Hong, H.; Yang, D.; Li, J.; Chen, S.; Pan, C.; Lu, H.; Liu, J.; Yan, C. Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal and Its Mitigation by Glomalin-Related Soil Protein in Sediments along the South China Coast. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 263, 114565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Dash, S.; Borah, S.S.; Kalamdhad, A.S. Heavy Metal Pollution and Potential Ecological Risk Assessment for Surficial Sediments of Deepor Beel, India. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 122, 107265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kumar, V.; Sharma, A.; Pandita, S.; Bhardwaj, R.; Thukral, A.K.; Cerda, A. A Review of Ecological Risk Assessment and Associated Health Risks with Heavy Metals in Sediment from India. Int. J. Sediment Res. 2020, 35, 516–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fang, G.-C.; Yang, H.-C. Heavy Metals in the River Sediments of Asian Countries of Taiwan, China, Japan, India, and Vietnam during 1999–2009. Environ. Forensics 2010, 11, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Haque, M.A.; Subramanian, V.; Gibbs, R.J. Copper, Lead, and Zinc Pollution of Soil Environment. C R C Crit. Rev. Environ. Control 1982, 12, 13–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Costa-Böddeker, S.; Hoelzmann, P.; Thuyên, L.X.; Huy, H.D.; Nguyen, H.A.; Richter, O.; Schwalb, A. Ecological Risk Assessment of a Coastal Zone in Southern Vietnam: Spatial Distribution and Content of Heavy Metals in Water and Surface Sediments of the Thi Vai Estuary and Can Gio Mangrove Forest. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 114, 1141–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dung, T.T.T.; Linh, T.M.; Chau, T.B.; Hoang, T.M.; Swennen, R.; Cappuyns, V. Contamination Status and Potential Release of Trace Metals in a Mangrove Forest Sediment in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 9536–9551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huong, N.T.L.; Masami, O.; Li, L.; Higashi, T.; Kanayama, M. Heavy Metal Contamination of River Sediments in Vietnam. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. - Water Manag. 2010, 163, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Phuong, N.M.; Kang, Y.; Sakurai, K.; Iwasaki, K.; Kien, C.N.; Van Noi, N.; Son, L.T. Levels and Chemical Forms of Heavy Metals in Soils from Red River Delta, Vietnam. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2010, 207, 319–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sany, S.B.T.; Salleh, A.; Sulaiman, A.H.; Sasekumar, A.; Rezayi, M.; Monazami tehrani, G. Heavy Metal Contamination in Water and Sediment of the Port Klang Coastal Area, Selangor, Malaysia. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 69, 2013–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yap, C.K. Sediment Watch: Monitoring, Ecological Risk Assessment and Environmental Management; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2018; ISBN Nova Science Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yap, C.K.; Pang, B.H. Assessment of Cu, Pb, and Zn Contamination in Sediment of North Western Peninsular Malaysia by Using Sediment Quality Values and Different Geochemical Indices. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 183, 23–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yap, C.K.; Pang, B.H. Anthropogenic Concentrations of Cd, Ni and Zn in the Intertidal, River and Drainage Sediments Collected from North Western Peninsular Malaysia. Pertanika J. Sci. Technol. 2011, 19, 93–107. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hakanson, L. An Ecological Risk Index for Aquatic Pollution Control.a Sedimentological Approach. Water Res. 1980, 14, 975–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhuang, S.; Lu, X.; Yu, B.; Fan, X.; Yang, Y. Ascertaining the Pollution, Ecological Risk and Source of Metal(Loid)s in the Upstream Sediment of Danjiang River, China. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 125, 107502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wedepohl, K.H. The Composition of the Continental Crust. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1995, 59, 1217–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Turekian, K.K.; Wedepohl, K.H. Distribution of the Elements in Some Major Units of the Earth’s Crust. GSA Bull. 1961, 72, 175–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Taylor, S.R.; McLennan, S.M. The Geochemical Evolution of the Continental Crust. Rev. Geophys. 1995, 33, 241–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rudnick, R.L.; Gao, S. 3.01 - Composition of the Continental Crust. In Treatise on Geochemistry; Holland, H.D., Turekian, K.K., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 2003; pp. 1–64. ISBN 978-0-08-043751-4. [Google Scholar]
  39. Yu, G.B.; Liu, Y.; Yu, S.; Wu, S.C.; Leung, A.O.W.; Luo, X.S.; Xu, B.; Li, H.B.; Wong, M.H. Inconsistency and Comprehensiveness of Risk Assessments for Heavy Metals in Urban Surface Sediments. Chemosphere 2011, 85, 1080–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. PRISMA Group Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Razak, H. Heavy metals content from coastal waters of Ujung Wau and Japara. Osea Indones. 1986, 21, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  42. Soegiarto, A. Marine and Coastal Environment Problems in Indonesia: An Input for the Assessment of the East Asian Regional Seas.; EAS Task Team on the Health of the Ocean: Bangkok, Thailand, December 1987. [Google Scholar]
  43. Widianarko, B.; Verweij, R.A.; Van Gestel, C.A.M.; Van Straalen, N.M. Spatial Distribution of Trace Metals in Sediments from Urban Streams of Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2000, 46, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Williams, T.M.; Rees, J.G.; Setiapermana, D. Metals and Trace Organic Compounds in Sediments and Waters of Jakarta Bay and the Pulau Seribu Complex, Indonesia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2000, 40, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Amin, B. Distribution of heavy metals Pb, Cu and Zn in surface sediments at Telaga Tujuh Karimun, Riau Achipelago. J. Nat. Indones. 2002, 5, 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  46. Arifin, Z. Fate of heavy metal contaminants and their implication of benthic communities; Final reports of competitive research 2006-2008; Research Center for Oceanography, LIPI: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  47. Riyadi, A.S.; Ital, T.; Isobe, T.; Ilyas, M.; Sudaryanto, A.; Setiawan, I.E.; Takahashi, S.; Tanabe, S. Spatial Profile of Trace Elements in Marine Sediments from Jakarta Bay, Indonesia. In Interdisciplinary Studies on Environmental Chemistry—Environmental Pollution and Ecotoxicology; Kawaguchi, M., Misaki, K., Sato, H., Yokokawa, T., Itai, T., Nguyen, T.M., Ono, J., Tanabe, S., Eds.; TERRAPUB: Tokyo, Japan, 2012; pp. 141–150. [Google Scholar]
  48. Rochyatun, E.; Rozak, A. The Distribution of Heavy Metals in Sediment of Jakarta Bay. Mar. Res. Indones. 2008, 33, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hosono, T.; Su, C.-C.; Delinom, R.; Umezawa, Y.; Toyota, T.; Kaneko, S.; Taniguchi, M. Decline in Heavy Metal Contamination in Marine Sediments in Jakarta Bay, Indonesia Due to Increasing Environmental Regulations. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2011, 92, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sindern, S.; Tremöhlen, M.; Dsikowitzky, L.; Gronen, L.; Schwarzbauer, J.; Siregar, T.H.; Ariyani, F.; Irianto, H.E. Heavy Metals in River and Coast Sediments of the Jakarta Bay Region (Indonesia) - Geogenic versus Anthropogenic Sources. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016, 110, 624–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Isworo, S.; Oetari, P.S. Heavy Metal Content on Sediments Seawater around Tanjung Jati Power Plant in Jepara District, Central Java Province, Indonesia. Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 3152–3159. [Google Scholar]
  52. Amin, B.; Nurrachmi, I.; Setyani, R. Spatial Distribution and Potential Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in the North-West Coast of Kundur Island, Kepulauan Riau Province, Indonesia. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Banda Aceh, Indonesia, 1 September 2018; IOP Science: Bristol, UK, 2018; 216, p. 012015. [Google Scholar]
  53. Menasveta, P.; Cheevaparanapiwat, V. Heavy Metals, Organochlorine Pesticides and PCBs in Green Mussels, Mullets and Sediments of River Mouths in Thailand. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1981, 12, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Everaarts, J.M.; Swennen, C. Heavy Metals (Zn, Cu, Cd, Pb) in Some Benthic Invertebrate Species and in Sediment from Three Coastal Areas in Thailand and Malaysia. J. Sci. Soc. Thail. 1987, 13, 189–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mingkhwan, R.; Worakhunpiset, S. Heavy Metal Contamination Near Industrial Estate Areas in Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya Province, Thailand and Human Health Risk Assessment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2018, 15, 1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Everaarts, J.M.; Swennen, C.; Cheewasedtham, W. Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb) in Surface Sediment and Organism in a Short Food-Chain, from the Intertidal Zone of Pattany Bay, Thailand––A Preliminary Study. Wallaceana 1994, 72, 17–24. [Google Scholar]
  57. Qiao, S.; Shi, X.; Fang, X.; Liu, S.; Kornkanitnan, N.; Gao, J.; Zhu, A.; Hu, L.; Yu, Y. Heavy Metal and Clay Mineral Analyses in the Sediments of Upper Gulf of Thailand and Their Implications on Sedimentary Provenance and Dispersion Pattern. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2015, 114, 488–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Potipat, J.; Tangkrock-olan, N.; Helander, H. Distribution of Selected Heavy Metals in Sediment of the River Basin of Coastal Area of Chanthaburi Province, Gulf of Thailand. EnvironmentAsia 2015, 8, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pradit, S.; Shazili, N.A.M.; Towatana, P.; Saengmanee, W. Trace Metals, Grain Size and Organic Matter in Sediment from a Coastal Area of Thailand and Malaysia. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manag. 2016, 19, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liu, S.; Shi, X.; Yang, G.; Khokiattiwong, S.; Kornkanitnan, N. Concentration Distribution and Assessment of Heavy Metals in the Surface Sediments of the Western Gulf of Thailand. Environ. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pumijumnong, N.; Danpradit, S. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Sediments and Mangrove Forest Stems from Surat Thani Provice, Thailand. Malays. For. 2016, 79, 212–228. [Google Scholar]
  62. Wijaya, A.R.; Ohde, S.; Shinjo, R.; Ganmanee, M.; Cohen, M.D. Geochemical Fractions and Modeling Adsorption of Heavy Metals into Contaminated River Sediments in Japan and Thailand Determined by Sequential Leaching Technique Using ICP-MS. Arab. J. Chem. 2019, 12, 780–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ho, T.L.T.; Egashira, K. Heavy Metal Characterization of River Sediment in Hanoi, Vietnam. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2000, 31, 2901–2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ho, H.H.; Rudy, S.; Damme, A. Distribution and Contamination Status of Heavy Metals in Estuarine Sediments near CauOng Harbor, Ha Long Bay, Vietnam. Geol. Belg. 2010, 13, 37–47. [Google Scholar]
  65. Tue, N.T.; Quy, T.D.; Amano, A.; Hamaoka, H.; Tanabe, S.; Nhuan, M.T.; Omori, K. Historical Profiles of Trace Element Concentrations in Mangrove Sediments from the Ba Lat Estuary, Red River, Vietnam. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2012, 223, 1315–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ho, H.H.; Swennen, R.; Cappuyns, V.; Vassilieva, E.; Neyens, G.; Rajabali, M.; Tran, T.V. Assessment on Pollution by Heavy Metals and Arsenic Based on Surficial and Core Sediments in the Cam River Mouth, Haiphong Province, Vietnam. Soil Sediment Contam. Int. J. 2013, 22, 415–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ho, H.H.; Swennen, R.; Cappuyns, V.; Vassilieva, E.; Van Gerven, T.; Van Tran, T. Speciation and Mobility of Selected Trace Metals (As, Cu, Mn, Pb and Zn) in Sediment with Depth in Cam River-Mouth, Haiphong, Vietnam. Aquat. Geochem. 2013, 19, 57–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dung, T.T.T.; Cappuyns, V.; Swennen, R.; Vassilieva, E.; Phung, N.K. Leachability of Arsenic and Heavy Metals from Blasted Copper Slag and Contamination of Marine Sediment and Soil in Ninh Hoa District, South Central of Vietnam. Appl. Geochem. 2014, 44, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Nguyen, H.; Zhang, W.; Li, Z.; Li, J.; Ge, C.; Liu, J.; Bai, X.; Feng, H.; Yu, L. Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Red River Surface Sediments, Vietnam. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016, 113, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hoai, N.D.; Duc, T.T.; Van, H.D.; Son, H.P.; Manh, H.N.; Dinh, L.T.; Xiaoyong, D.; Dac, V.N. Sedimentation Rates and Heavy Metal Concentrations in the Tidal Flats of North Vietnam. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2019, 28, 3721–3733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dang Hoai, N.; Nguyen Manh, H.; Tran Duc, T.; Do Cong, T.; Tran Dinh, L.; Johnstone, R.; Nguyen Thi Kim, D. An Assessment of Heavy Metal Contamination in the Surface Sediments of Ha Long Bay, Vietnam. Environ. Earth Sci. 2020, 79, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tham, T.T.; Lap, B.Q.; Mai, N.T.; Trung, N.T.; Thao, P.P.; Huong, N.T.L. Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Sediments of Duyen Hai Seaport Area in Tra Vinh Province, Vietnam. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2021, 232, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kamaruzzaman, B.Y.; Willison, K.Y.S.; Ong, M.C. The Concentration of Manganese, Copper, Zinc, Lead and Thorium in Sediments of Paka Estuary, Terengganu, Malaysia. Pertanika J. Sci. Technol. 2006, 14, 53–61. [Google Scholar]
  74. Kamaruzzaman, Y.Y.; Ong, M.C. Distribution of Some Geochemical Elements in the Surface Sediment of Kerteh Mangrove Forest, Terengganu, Malaysia. Sains Malays. 2008, 37, 337–340. [Google Scholar]
  75. Dasar, K.N.; Ahmad, A.; Mushrifah, I.; Shuhaimi-Othman, M. Water Quality and Heavy Metal Concentrations in Sediment of Sungai Kelantan, Kelantan, Malaysia: A Baseline Study. Sains Malays. 2009, 38, 435–442. [Google Scholar]
  76. Rezaee Ebrahim Saraee, K.; Abdi, M.R.; Naghavi, K.; Saion, E.; Shafaei, M.A.; Soltani, N. Distribution of Heavy Metals in Surface Sediments from the South China Sea Ecosystem, Malaysia. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 183, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Redzwan, G.; Halim, H.; Alias, S.; Rahman, M. Assessment of Heavy Metal Contamination at West and East Coastal Area of Peninsular Malaysia. Malays. J. Sci. 2014, 33, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Ong, M.C.; Joseph, B.; Shazili, N.A.M.; Ghazali, A.; Mohamad, M.N. Heavy Metals Concentration in Surficial Sediments of Bidong Island, South China Sea off the East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia. Asian J. Earth Sci. 2015, 8, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Abdullah, M.Z.; Abd Manap, N.R.; Saat, A.; Hamzah, Z.; Abas, M.T. Evaluation of Heavy Metal Contamination Levels of Balok River Sediments in Pahang, Malaysia Based on Geoaccumulation Index and Supported with Enrichment Factor. Malays. J. Anal. Sci. 2015, 19, 707–714. [Google Scholar]
  80. Wang, A.-J.; Bong, C.W.; Xu, Y.-H.; Hassan, M.H.A.; Ye, X.; Bakar, A.F.A.; Li, Y.-H.; Lai, Z.-K.; Xu, J.; Loh, K.H. Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Surficial Sediments from a Tropical River-Estuary-Shelf System: A Case Study of Kelantan River, Malaysia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 125, 492–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Mohamed, C.A.R.; Shazili, N.A.M. Recent Concentrations of Trace Elements in Coastal Sediment of Terengganu, Malaysia. Sains Malays. 1998, 27, 73–82. [Google Scholar]
  82. Pooveneswary, N.; Bakar, A.F.B.A.; Wei, B.C.; Weng Lee, C.; Ai Jun, W.; Amir Hassan, M.H.B.; Yunus, R.M.; Pauzi Zakaria, M. Contamination Status and Ecological Risk of Heavy Metals in Surface Sediment of Kelantan River and Its Nearshore Area, Malaysia. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 2019, 20, 103–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Praveena, S.; Ahmed, A.; Radojevic, M.; Abdullah, M.; Aris, A.Z. Heavy Metals in Mangrove Surface Sediment of Mengkabong Lagoon, Sabah: Multivariate and Geo-Accumulation Index Approaches. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2007, 2, 139–148. [Google Scholar]
  84. Nagarajan, R.; Jonathan, M.P.; Roy, P.D.; Wai-Hwa, L.; Prasanna, M.V.; Sarkar, S.K.; Navarrete-López, M. Metal Concentrations in Sediments from Tourist Beaches of Miri City, Sarawak, Malaysia (Borneo Island). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2013, 73, 369–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Aris, A.Z.; Husna, N.; Shafie, N.; Looi, L.J.; Praveena, S.; Ramil, M.F.; Yusoff, M. The Chemometric Approach as a Useful Tool in the Identification of Metal Pollution Sources of Riverine-Mangrove Sediment of Kota Marudu, Sabah, Malaysia. EnvironmentAsia 2014, 7, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ali, B.N.M.; Lin, C.Y.; Cleophas, F.; Abdullah, M.H.; Musta, B. Assessment of Heavy Metals Contamination in Mamut River Sediments Using Sediment Quality Guidelines and Geochemical Indices. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014, 187, 4190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Tan, W.H.; Tair, R.; Ali, S.A.M.; Talibe, A. Distribution of Heavy Metals in Seawater and Surface Sediment in Coastal Area of Tuaran, Sabah. Trans. Sci. Technol. 2016, 3, 114–122. [Google Scholar]
  88. Tair, R.; Eduin, S. Heavy Metals In Water And Sediment From Liwagu River And Mansahaban River At Ranau Sabah. Malays. J. Geosci. MJG 2018, 2, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Chai, H.P.; Lee, N.; Grinang, J.; Ling, T.Y.; Sim, S.F. Assessment of Heavy Metals in Water, Fish and Sediments of the Baleh River, Sarawak, Malaysia. Borneo J. Resour. Sci. Technol. 2018, 8, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Asare, E.A.; Assim, Z.B.; Wahi, R.B.; Droepenu, E.K.; Iya, N.I.D. Geochemistry Examination of Surface Sediments from Sadong River, Sarawak, Malaysia: Validation of ICP-OES Assessment of Selected Heavy Metals. Eurasian J. Anal. Chem. 2019, 14, 9–20. [Google Scholar]
  91. Mat, I.; Maah, M.J.; Yahya, M.S. The Status of Trace Metal Pollution in Inter-Tidal Sediments from the Straits of Tebrau, Malaysia. J. Sains 1994, 2, 221–228. [Google Scholar]
  92. Wood, A.K.H.; Ahmad, Z.; Shazili, N.A.M.; Yaakob, R.; Carpenter, R. Geochemistry of Sediments in Johor Strait between Malaysia and Singapore. Cont. Shelf Res. 1997, 17, 1207–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Yap, C.K.; Edward, F.; Tan, S. Heavy Metal Concentrations (Cu, Pb, Ni and Zn) in the Surface Sediments from a Semi-Enclosed Intertidal Water, the Johore Straits: Monitoring Data for Future Reference. J. Sustain. Sci. Manag. 2010, 5, 44–57. [Google Scholar]
  94. Sivalingam, P.M.; Yoshida, Y.; Kojima, H.; Allapitchay, A. Trace Metals Biodeposition and Its Extent of Pollution in Coastal Molluscs, Sediment and Sea Water Samples from the Island of Penang, Malaysia. Proc Fourth CSK Symp Tokyo 1979, 534–544. [Google Scholar]
  95. Seng, C.E.; Lira, P.E.; Lira, T.T. Heavy Metal Concentrations in Coastal Seawater and Sediments off Prai Industrial Estate, Penang, Malaysia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1987, 18, 611–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ismail, A. Heavy Metal Concentrations in Sediments off Bintulu, Malaysia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1993, 26, 706–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lim, P.-E.; Kiu, M.-Y. Determination and Speciation of Heavy Metals in Sediments of the Juru River, Penang, Malaysia. Environ. Monit. Assess. 1995, 35, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Ismail, A.; Asmah, M. Copper, Zinc, Lead and Cadmium in Intertidal Molluscs and Sediment off Seberang Perai Coastline, Malaysia. In Proceedings of the fourth Princess Chulabhorn International Science Congress, Bangkok, Thailand, 28 November–2 December 1999. [Google Scholar]
  99. Yap, C.K.; Ismail, A.; Tan, S.G.; Omar, H. Concentrations of Cu and Pb in the Offshore and Intertidal Sediments of the West Coast of Peninsular Malaysia. Environ. Int. 2002, 28, 467–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yap, C.K.; Ismail, A.; Tan, S.G. Cd and Zn Concentrations in the Straits of Malacca and Intertidal Sediments of the West Coast of Peninsular Malaysia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2003, 46, 1349–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Yap, C.K.; Mew, S.C.; Edward, F.B.; Ismail, A.; Tan, S. Comparison of Heavy Metal Concentrations in Surface Sediment of Tanjung Piai Wetland with Other Sites Receiving Anthropogenic Inputs along the Southwestern Coast of Peninsular Malaysia. Wetl. Sci. 2006, 4, 48–57. [Google Scholar]
  102. Yap, C.K.; Ismail, A.; Pang, B.H.; Yeow, K.L.; Tan, S.G.; Siraj, S.S. Elevated Heavy Metal Concentrations in Surface Sediments Collected from the Drainages of the Sri Serdang Industrial Area, Malaysia. Malays. Appl. Biol. 2006, 35, 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  103. Yap, C.K.; Bin, H.P.; Supian, M.F.; Yoong, I.H.; Tan, S. Heavy Metal Pollution in Surface Sediments Collected from Drainages Receiving Different Anthropogenic Sources from Peninsular Malaysia. Wetl. Sci. 2007, 5, 97–104. [Google Scholar]
  104. Yap, C.K.; Fairuz, M.S.; Cheng, W.H. How Elevated Levels of Cd, Cu and Pb in the Surface Sediments Collected from the Drainage Receiving Metal Industrial Effluents? Comparison with Metal Industrial Drainage and Intertidal Sediments in Selangor, Malaysia. Asian J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Environ. Sci. 2008, 10, 385–391. [Google Scholar]
  105. Yap, C.K.; Fairuz, M.S.; Cheng, W.H.; Tan, S.G. Distribution of Ni and Zn in the Surface Sediments Collected from Drainages and Intertidal Area in Selangor. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 2008, 31, 79–90. [Google Scholar]
  106. Yap, C.K.; Tan, S. Heavy Metal Pollution in the Juru River Basin Receiving Industrial Effluents: The Need for Biochemical and Molecular Studies in the Edible Cockles Anadara Granosa. Malays. Appl. Biol 2008, 37, 63–68. [Google Scholar]
  107. Razi-Idris, W.M.; Rahim, S.A.; Rahman, Z.A.; Lihan, T.; Hashim, A.; Mohd-Yusuf, S.N. Geochemical composition of beach sediment in Langkawi Island, Kedah. Malaysia. Sains Malays. 38, 313–320.
  108. Yap, C.K.; Edward, F.; Pang, B.H. A Comparative Study of Distribution of Heavy Metal Concentrations in the Pomacea Insularum Collected from Polluted and Unpolluted Sites of the Freshwater Ecosystem in Malaysia. Wetl. Sci. 2009, 7, 75–82. [Google Scholar]
  109. Yap, C.K.; Ruszaidi, S.; Cheng, H.; Tan, S. Heavy-Metal Concentrations in the Mangrove Snail, Nerita Lineata and Surface Sediments Collected from Klang River Estuary, Selangor, Malaysia. J. Sustain. Sci. Manag. 2010, 5, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  110. Yap, C.K.; Khairul, I.M. A Comparative Study of Heavy Metal Concentrations in the Clam Corbicula Javanica and Surface Sediment Collected from Clean and Polluted Sites of Langat River. Malay. Appl. Biol. 2010, 39, 57–61. [Google Scholar]
  111. Sany, B.T.; Sulaiman, A.H.; Monazami, G.; Salleh, A. Assessment of Sediment Quality According To Heavy Metal Status in the West Port of Malaysia. Int. J. Geol. Environ. Eng. 2011, 5, 111–115. [Google Scholar]
  112. Nemati, K.; Bakar, N.K.A.; Abas, M.R.; Sobhanzadeh, E. Speciation of Heavy Metals by Modified BCR Sequential Extraction Procedure in Different Depths of Sediments from Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 192, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Salam, M.A.; Paul, S.C.; Shaari, F.I.; Rak, A.E.; Ahmad, R.B.; Kadir, W.R. Geostatistical Distribution and Contamination Status of Heavy Metals in the Sediment of Perak River, Malaysia. Hydrology 2019, 6, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Abubakar, U.S.; Zulkifli, S.Z.; Ismail, A. Heavy Metals Bioavailability and Pollution Indices Evaluation in the Mangrove Surface Sediment of Sungai Puloh, Malaysia. Environ. Earth Sci. 2018, 77, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Wood, A.K.; Muhammad, N.; Mahmood, C.S.; Ahmad, Z.; Shazili, N.A.; Law, A.T.; Yaakob, R. Corer Sampling and the Use of Neutron Activation Analysis in Evaluating Pollution at the Juru Waterway, Penang. J. Sains Nukl. Malays. 1993, 11, 105–128. [Google Scholar]
  116. Lim, W.Y.; Aris, A.Z.; Ismail, T.H.T. Spatial Geochemical Distribution and Sources of Heavy Metals in the Sediment of Langat River, Western Peninsular Malaysia. Environ. Forensics 2013, 14, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Jamil, T.; Lias, K.; Hanif, H.; Norsila, D.; Aeisyah, A.; Kamaruzzaman, B. The Spatial Variability of Heavy Metals Concentrations and Sedimentary Organic Matter in Estuary Sediment of Sungai Perlis, Perlis, Malaysia. Sci. Postprint 2014, 1, e00016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Shafie, N.A.; Aris, A.Z.; Haris, H. Geoaccumulation and Distribution of Heavy Metals in the Urban River Sediment. Int. J. Sediment Res. 2014, 29, 368–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Haris, H.; Aris, A.Z. Distribution of Metals and Quality of Intertidal Surface Sediment near Commercial Ports and Estuaries of Urbanized Rivers in Port Klang, Malaysia. Environ. Earth Sci. 2015, 73, 7205–7218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Naji, A.; Ismail, A. Assessment of Metals Contamination in Klang River Surface Sediments by Using Different Indexes. EnvironmentAsia 2011, 4, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Cheng, W.H.; Yap, C.K. Potential Human Health Risks from Toxic Metals via Mangrove Snail Consumption and Their Ecological Risk Assessments in the Habitat Sediment from Peninsular Malaysia. Chemosphere 2015, 135, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Hamzan, N.A.A.; Zaini, F.F.M.; Ibrahim, M.I.; Ariffin, N.A.N. Assessment of Selected Heavy Metals in Seawater and Sediment at Klang Coastal Area Malaysia. Malays. J. Anal. Sci. 2015, 19, 9. [Google Scholar]
  123. Khodami, S.; Surif, M.; Wo, W.M.; Daryanabard, R. Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Surface Sediments of the Bayan Lepas Area, Penang, Malaysia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 114, 615–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Wong, K.W.; Yap, C.K.; Nulit, R.; Hamzah, M.S.; Chen, S.K.; Cheng, W.H.; Karami, A.; Al-Shami, S.A. Effects of Anthropogenic Activities on the Heavy Metal Levels in the Clams and Sediments in a Tropical River. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 116–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. ELTurk, M.; Abdullah, R.; Zakaria, R.M.; Abu Bakar, N.K. Heavy Metal Contamination in Mangrove Sediments in Klang Estuary, Malaysia: Implication of Risk Assessment. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2019, 226, 106266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Shaari, H.; Khalik, W.; M Shazili, N.A.; Abdul Razak, N.; Bidai, J. Spatial Distribution of Heavy Metals in Tropical Coastal Sediment of the Northern Malacca Strait, Malaysia. Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol. 2018, 17, 1115–1123. [Google Scholar]
  127. Nyangon, L.; Zainal, N.; Mohamad Pazi, A.M.; Gandaseca, S. Heavy Metals in Mangrove Sediments along the Selangor River, Malaysia. For. Soc. 2019, 3, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Yusoff, F.M.; Peralta, H.M.; Shariff, M.; Safura, S. Partitioning of Heavy Metals in Different Environmental and Biotic Components in the Coastal Waters of the Straits of Malacca, Peninsular Malaysia. J. Environ. Biol. 2020, 41, 1371–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Vicente-Beckett, V.A.; Pascual, C.B.; Kwan, C.S.; Beckett, R. Levels and Distribution of Trace Metals in Sediments of Laguna Lake (Philippines) and Its Tributary Rivers. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 1991, 45, 101–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Vicente-Beckett, V.A. Trace Metal Levels and Speciation in Sediments of Some Philippine Natural Waters. Sci. Total Environ. 1992, 125, 345–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Prudente, M.S.; Ichihashi, H.; Tatsukawa, R. Heavy Metal Concentrations in Sediments from Manila Bay, Philippines and Inflowing Rivers. Environ. Pollut. 1994, 86, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. David, C.P. Heavy Metal Concentrations in Marine Sediments Impacted by a Mine-Tailings Spill, Marinduque Island, Philippines. Environ. Geol. 2002, 42, 955–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Olivares, R.U.; Maria, E.J.S.; Sombrito, E.Z. Environmental Assessment of Metal Pollution in Manila Bay Surface Sediments. Philipp. J. Sci. 2019, 149, 183–195. [Google Scholar]
  134. Elvira, M.V.; Faustino-Eslava, D.V.; Fukuyama, M.; de Chavez, E.R.C.; Padrones, J.T. Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in the Bottom Sediments of Laguna de Bay, Philippines. Mindanao J. Sci. Technol. 2020, 18. [Google Scholar]
  135. US EPA. Superfund Public Health Evaluation Manual; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 1986; pp. 1–86.
  136. Yang, D.; Liu, J.; Wang, Q.; Hong, H.; Zhao, W.; Chen, S.; Yan, C.; Lu, H. Geochemical and Probabilistic Human Health Risk of Chromium in Mangrove Sediments: A Case Study in Fujian, China. Chemosphere 2019, 233, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. US EPA. US EPA Human Health Evaluation Manual. In Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund; Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 1989; 1, ISBN EPA/600/P-95/002F. [Google Scholar]
  138. US EPA. Exposure Factors Handbook; National Center for Environmental Assessment, US EPA Office of Research and Development: Washington, DC, USA, 1997; ISBN EPA/600/P-95/002F.
  139. US EPA. Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment Vasquez Boulevard and I-70 Superfund Site Demver, Co; US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
  140. Chabukdhara, M.; Nema, A.K. Heavy Metals Assessment in Urban Soil around Industrial Clusters in Ghaziabad, India: Probabilistic Health Risk Approach. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 87, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Qing, X.; Yutong, Z.; Shenggao, L. Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution and Human Health Risk in Urban Soils of Steel Industrial City (Anshan), Liaoning, Northeast China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 120, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. US EPA. Reference Dose (RfD): Description and Use in Health Risk Assessments, Background Document 1A; US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 1993.
  143. Beijing Quality and Technology Supervision Bureau Environmental site assessment guideline; Beijing Quality and Technology Supervision Bureau: Beijing, China, 2009.
  144. Ferreira-Baptista, L.; De Miguel, E. Geochemistry and Risk Assessment of Street Dust in Luanda, Angola: A Tropical Urban Environment. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 4501–4512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Hu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, J.; Wang, T.; Lian, H.; Ding, Z. Bioaccessibility and Health Risk of Arsenic, Mercury and Other Metals in Urban Street Dusts from a Mega-City, Nanjing, China. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 1215–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Kelepertzis, E. Investigating the Sources and Potential Health Risks of Environmental Contaminants in the Soils and Drinking Waters from the Rural Clusters in Thiva Area (Greece). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 100, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Al-Mutairi, K.A.; Yap, C.K. A Review of Heavy Metals in Coastal Surface Sediments from the Red Sea: Health-Ecological Risk Assessments. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2021, 18, 2798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry) Atlanta. Toxicological Profile for Copper; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2004.
  149. Janjuhah, H.T.; Ishfaque, M.; Mehmood, M.I.; Kontakiotis, G.; Shahzad, S.M.; Zarkogiannis, S.D. Integrated Underground Mining Hazard Assessment, Management, Environmental Monitoring, and Policy Control in Pakistan. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Flemming, C.A.; Trevors, J.T. Copper Toxicity and Chemistry in the Environment: A Review. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 1989, 44, 143–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). Toxicological Profile for Zinc; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2005.
  152. Han, R.; Zhou, B.; Huang, Y.; Lu, X.; Li, S.; Li, N. Bibliometric Overview of Research Trends on Heavy Metal Health Risks and Impacts in 1989–2018. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 276, 123249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Goyer, R.A. Lead. In Patty’s toxicology; Bingham, E., Cohrssen, B., Powell, C.H., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2001; Volume 2, pp. 611–675. [Google Scholar]
  154. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). Toxicological Profile for Lead; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2020.
  155. Tong, S.; von Schirnding, Y.E.; Prapamontol, T. Environmental Lead Exposure: A Public Health Problem of Global Dimensions. Bull. World Health Organ. 2000, 78, 1068–1077. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  156. Rossi, E. Low Level Environmental Lead Exposure – A Continuing Challenge. Clin. Biochem. Rev. 2008, 29, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  157. Asokbunyarat, V.; Sirivithayapakorn, S. Heavy Metals in Sediments and Water at the Chao Phraya River Mouth, Thailand. Thai Environ. Eng. J. 2020, 34, 33–44. [Google Scholar]
  158. Censi, P.; Spoto, S.E.; Saiano, F.; Sprovieri, M.; Mazzola, S.; Nardone, G.; Di Geronimo, S.I.; Punturo, R.; Ottonello, D. Heavy Metals in Coastal Water Systems. A Case Study from the Northwestern Gulf of Thailand. Chemosphere 2006, 64, 1167–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Cheevaporn, V.; Jacinto, G.S.; San Diego-McGlone, M.L. Heavy Metal Fluxes in Bang Pakong River Estuary, Thailand: Sedimentary vs Diffusive Fluxes. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1995, 31, 290–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Hungspreugs, M.; Yuangthong, C. A History of Metal Pollution in the Upper Gulf of Thailand. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1983, 14, 465–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Khuntong, S.; Phaophang, C.; Sudprasert, W. Assessment of Radionuclides and Heavy Metals in Marine Sediments along the Upper Gulf of Thailand. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2015, 611, 012023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Ladachart, R.; Sutthirat, C.; Hisada, K.; Charusiri, P. Soil Erosion and Heavy Metal Contamination in the Middle Part of the Songkhla Lake Coastal Area, Southern Thailand. In Coastal Environments: Focus on Asian Regions; Subramanian, V., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 106–129. ISBN 978-90-481-3002-3. [Google Scholar]
  163. Pengthamkeerati, P.; Kornkanitnan, N.; Sawangarreruks, S.; Wanichacheva, N.; Wainiphithapong, C.; Sananwai, N. Assessment of Heavy Metals in Sediments of the Don Hoi Lot Area in the Mae Klong Estuary, Thailand. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A Tox. Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2013, 48, 1356–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Polprasert, C. Heavy Metal Pollution in the Chao Phraya River Estuary, Thailand. Water Res. 1982, 16, 775–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Sowana, A.; Shrestha, R.; Parkpian, P.; Pongquan, S. Influence of Coastal Land Use on Soil Heavy-Metal Contamination in Pattani Bay, Thailand. J. Coast. Res. 2011, 27, 252–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Windom, H.L.; Silpipat, S.; Chanpongsang, A.; Smith, R.G.; Hungspreugs, M. Trace Metal Composition of and Accumulation Rates of Sediments in the Upper Gulf of Thailand. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 1984, 19, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Ta, A.T.; Babel, S. Microplastics Pollution with Heavy Metals in the Aquaculture Zone of the Chao Phraya River Estuary, Thailand. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 161, 111747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Worakhunpiset, S. Trace Elements in Marine Sediment and Organisms in the Gulf of Thailand. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2018, 15, 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Thongra-ar, W.; Musika, C.; Wongsudawan, W.; Munhapon, A. Heavy Metals Contamination in Sediments along the Eastern Coast of the Gulf of Thailand. EnvironmentAsia 2008, 1, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Lo, C.K.; Fung, Y.S. Heavy Metal Pollution Profiles of Dated Sediment Cores from Hebe Haven, Hong Kong. Water Res. 1992, 26, 1605–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Costa-Böddeker, S.; Thuyên, L.X.; Hoelzmann, P.; de Stigter, H.C.; van Gaever, P.; Huy, H.Đ.; Smol, J.P.; Schwalb, A. Heavy Metal Pollution in a Reforested Mangrove Ecosystem (Can Gio Biosphere Reserve, Southern Vietnam): Effects of Natural and Anthropogenic Stressors over a Thirty-Year History. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 716, 137035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Huy, N.; Luyen, T.; Phe, T.; Mai, N. Toxic Elements and Heavy Metals in Sediments in Tham Luong Canal, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Environ. Geol. 2003, 43, 836–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Nguyen, N.T.T.; Volkova, I.V. Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Water and Sediments in the Red River Delta (Vietnam). IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 451, 012203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Nguyen, X.-V.; Tran, M.-H.; Le, T.-D.; Papenbrock, J. An Assessment of Heavy Metal Contamination on the Surface Sediment of Seagrass Beds at the Khanh Hoa Coast, Vietnam. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2017, 99, 728–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Nguyen, B.T.; Do, D.D.; Nguyen, T.X.; Nguyen, V.N.; Phuc Nguyen, D.T.; Nguyen, M.H.; Thi Truong, H.T.; Dong, H.P.; Le, A.H.; Bach, Q.-V. Seasonal, Spatial Variation, and Pollution Sources of Heavy Metals in the Sediment of the Saigon River, Vietnam. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 256, 113412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Strady, E.; Dang, V.B.H.; Némery, J.; Guédron, S.; Dinh, Q.T.; Denis, H.; Nguyen, P.D. Baseline Seasonal Investigation of Nutrients and Trace Metals in Surface Waters and Sediments along the Saigon River Basin Impacted by the Megacity of Ho Chi Minh (Vietnam). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 3226–3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Thanh-Nho, N.; Marchand, C.; Strady, E.; Van Vinh, T.; Taillardat, P.; Cong-Hau, N.; Nhu-Trang, T.-T. Trace Metal Dynamics in a Tropical Mangrove Tidal Creek: Influence of Porewater Seepage (Can Gio, Vietnam). Front. Environ. Sci. 2020, 8, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Thanh-Nho, N.; Marchand, C.; Strady, E.; Vinh, T.-V.; Nhu-Trang, T.-T. Metals Geochemistry and Ecological Risk Assessment in a Tropical Mangrove (Can Gio, Vietnam). Chemosphere 2019, 219, 365–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Thinh, N.V.; Osanai, Y.; Adachi, T.; Thai, P.K.; Nakano, N.; Ozaki, A.; Kuwahara, Y.; Kato, R.; Makio, M.; Kurosawa, K. Chemical Speciation and Bioavailability Concentration of Arsenic and Heavy Metals in Sediment and Soil Cores in Estuarine Ecosystem, Vietnam. Microchem. J. 2018, 139, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Tu, N.P.C.; Ha, N.N.; Tri, N.N.; Dong, N.V. Distribution of Heavy Metals in Sediment along the Southern Coast of Vietnam. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 589, 012014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Ho, H.H.; Swennen, R.; Cappuyns, V.; Vassilieva, E.; Neyens, G.; Rajabali, M.; Tran, T.V. Geogene Versus Anthropogene Origin of Trace Metals in Sediments in Cua Luc Estuary and Ha Long Bay, Vietnam. Estuaries Coasts 2013, 36, 203–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Thung, D.C.; Thuy, L.T. Status of the Ha Long Heritage Biodiversity.; Publishing House for Science and Technology: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2009; pp. 28–37. [Google Scholar]
  183. Costa-Böddeker, S.; Thuyên, L.X.; Hoelzmann, P.; de Stigter, H.C.; van Gaever, P.; Huy, H.Đ.; Schwalb, A. The Hidden Threat of Heavy Metal Pollution in High Sedimentation and Highly Dynamic Environment: Assessment of Metal Accumulation Rates in the Thi Vai Estuary, Southern Vietnam. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 242, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Abobakir, A. Determination Of Heavy Metals (Pb, Zn, Cd, Cu) of Coastal Urban Area of Semarang Indonesia. In Proceedings of the E3S Web of Conferences, Semarang, Indonesia, 14–15 August 2018; 73, p. 03017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Angel, B.M.; Simpson, S.L.; Jarolimek, C.V.; Jung, R.; Waworuntu, J.; Batterham, G. Trace Metals Associated with Deep-Sea Tailings Placement at the Batu Hijau Copper–Gold Mine, Sumbawa, Indonesia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2013, 73, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Armid, A.; Shinjo, R.; Sabarwati, S.H.; Ruslan, R. Pollution Assessment of Various Heavy Metals in the Surface Sediment of Kendari Bay, Indonesia. Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol. 2017, 16, 8. [Google Scholar]
  187. Asaf, R.; Athirah, A.; Paena, M.; Mustafa, A. Quality Indicators of Metals Pollution in the Coastal Sediments in Sangihe Islands Regency, North Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 564, 012039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Bohari, R.; Palutturi, S. Analysis of Heavy Metal Distribution and Content in Coastal Area of Makassar, Indonesia. Indian J. Public Health Res. Dev. 2018, 9, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Booij, K.; Hillebrand, M.T.; Nolting, R.F.; van Ooijen, J. Nutrients, Trace Metals, and Organic Contaminants in Banten Bay, Indonesia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2001, 42, 1187–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Dewi, N.N.; Nindarwi, D.D.; Wulansari, P.D.; Rahardja, B.S. Heavy Metals Contamination (Pb, Cd, and Hg) in Bomo Coastal Ecosystem, Banyuwangi, Indonesia. Indian Vet. J. 2020, 97, 31–33. [Google Scholar]
  191. Edinger, E.N.; Siregar, P.R.; Blackwood, G.M. Heavy Metal Concentrations in Shallow Marine Sediments Affected by Submarine Tailings Disposal and Artisanal Gold Mining, Buyat-Ratototok District, North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Environ. Geol. 2007, 52, 701–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Haeruddin, H.; Supriharyono, S.; Rahman, A.; Ghofar, A.; Iryanthony, S.B. Spatial Distribution and Heavy Metal Pollution Analysis in the Sediments of Garang Watershed, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia. AACL Bioflux 2020, 13, 2577–2587. [Google Scholar]
  193. Cordova, M.R. A Preliminary Study on Heavy Metal Pollutants Chrome (Cr), Cadmium (Cd), and Lead (Pb) in Sediments and Beach Morning Glory Vegetation (Ipomoea Pes-Caprae) from Dasun Estuary, Rembang, Indonesia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2021, 162, 111819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Irzon, R.; Syafri, I.; Hutabarat, J.; Sendjaja, P.; Permanadewi, S. Heavy Metals Content and Pollution in Tin Tailings from Singkep Island, Riau, Indonesia. Sains Malays. 2018, 47, 2609–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Karina, S.; Suhermi, R.; Alesyah, M.; Octavina, C.; Ulfah, M. Analysis of Heavy Metals in Fluvial Sediments Affected by Coal Spill Waters in Lampuuk Beach, Aceh Province, Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 348, 012085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Budiyanto, F.; Hindarti, D. Speciation of Heavy Metals Cu, Ni and Zn by Modified BCR Sequential Extraction Procedure in Sediments from Banten Bay, Banten Province, Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 118, 012059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Lestari, L.; Budiyanto, F.; Puspitasari, R.; Purbonegoro, T.; Cordova, M.R.; Hindarti, D. Fractionation of Metal in Surface Sediment from Cirebon Coastal Waters, West Java, Indonesia. AIP Conf. Proc. 2018, 2024, 020062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Prartono, T.; Sanusi, H.S.; Nurjaya, I.W. Seasonal Distribution and Geochemical Fractionation of Heavy Metals from Surface Sediment in a Tropical Estuary of Jeneberang River, Indonesia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016, 111, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Riani, E.; Cordova, M.R.; Arifin, Z. Heavy Metal Pollution and Its Relation to the Malformation of Green Mussels Cultured in Muara Kamal Waters, Jakarta Bay, Indonesia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 133, 664–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Samawi, M.F.; Werorilangi, S.; Isyirini, R. Bioavailability Exchangeable Phase of Heavy Metals in Sediments and Contamination in Shellfish at Estuaries on the West Coast of South Sulawesi, Indonesia. AACL Bioflux 2020, 13, 2365–2374. [Google Scholar]
  201. Sudarningsih, S.; Aliyah, H.; Fajar, S.J.; Bijaksana, S. Magnetic Characterization and Heavy Metals Pollutions of Sediments in Citarum River, Indonesia. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1204, 012082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. Syakti, A.D.; Demelas, C.; Hidayati, N.V.; Rakasiwi, G.; Vassalo, L.; Kumar, N.; Prudent, P.; Doumenq, P. Heavy Metal Concentrations in Natural and Human-Impacted Sediments of Segara Anakan Lagoon, Indonesia. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014, 187, 4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Takarina, N.D.; Browne, D.R.; Risk, M.J. Speciation of Heavy Metals in Coastal Sediments of Semarang, Indonesia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2004, 49, 861–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Tanjung, R.H.R.; Hamuna, B.; Yonas, M.N. Assessing Heavy Metal Contamination in Marine Sediments Around the Coastal Waters of Mimika Regency, Papua Province, Indonesia. J. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 20, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Tongggiroh, A.; Imran, A.M.; Haerany, S. Environmental Geochemistry of Heavy Metals and Plagioclase Background Enrichment Factor in Coastal Sediments at Lumpue - Parepare, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 370, 012002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Yasuda, M.; Syawal, M.S.; Sikder, M.T.; Hosokawa, T.; Saito, T.; Tanaka, S.; Kurasaki, M. Metal Concentrations of River Water and Sediments in West Java, Indonesia. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2011, 87, 669–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  207. Yona, D.; Fuad, M.A.Z.; Hidayati, N. Spatial Distribution of Heavy Metals in the Surface Sediments of the Southern Coast of Pacitan, Indonesia. Indones. J. Chem. 2018, 18, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  208. Yona, D.; Febriana, R.; Handayani, M. The Comparison of Heavy Metals (Pb and Cd) in the Water and Sediment during Spring and Neap Tide Tidal Periods in Popoh Bay, Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 137, 012037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Arifin, Z.; Puspitasari, R.; Miyazaki, N. Heavy Metal Contamination in Indonesian Coastal Marine Ecosystems: A Historical Perspective. Coast. Mar. Sci. 2012, 35, 227–233. [Google Scholar]
  210. Amin, B.; Ismail, A.; Yap, C.K. Distribution and Speciation of Zn and Pb in Coastal Sediments of Dumai Sumatera, Indonesia. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2008, 90, 609–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Alkarkhi, A.F.M.; Ismail, N.; Ahmed, A.; Easa, A. mat Analysis of Heavy Metal Concentrations in Sediments of Selected Estuaries of Malaysia—a Statistical Assessment. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2008, 153, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Antonina, A.N.; Azhar, M.S.N.; Lokman, H.M.; Zauyah, D.S.; Kamaruzzaman, Y.; Shamsuddin, A. Heavy Metal Distribution of the South China Sea Continental Shelf Sediments off Sabah and Sarawak Coastlines. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manag. 2007, 10, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Ismail, A.; Yap, C.K.; Chan, F.F. Concentrations of Cd, Cu and Zn in Sediments Collected from Urban Lakes at Kelana Jaya, Peninsular Malaysia. Wetl. Sci. 2004, 2, 248–258. [Google Scholar]
  214. Law, A.T.; Singh, A. Distribution of Manganese, Iron, Copper, Lead and Zinc in Water and Sediment of Kelang Estuary. Pertanika 1986, 9, 209–217. [Google Scholar]
  215. Lias, L.; Jamil, T.; Aliaa, S.N. A Preliminary Study on Heavy Metal Concentration in the Marine Bivalves Marcia Marmorata Species and Sediments Collected From the Coastal Area of Kuala Perlis, North Of Malaysia. IOSR J. Appl. Chem. 2013, 4, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Mahat, N.A.; Muktar, N.K.; Ismail, R.; Razak, F.I.A.; Wahab, R.A.; Keyon, A.S.A. Toxic Metals in Perna Viridis Mussel and Surface Seawater in Pasir Gudang Coastal Area, Malaysia, and Its Health Implications. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 30224–30235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Mamun, D.A.A.; Musta, B.; Yaccup, R. Distribution of Heavy Metals (Cr, Mn, Fe, Co & Ni) in Marine Sediment Cores at Marudu Bay, Sabah. ASM Sci. J. 2018, 11, 66–73. [Google Scholar]
  218. Omorinoye, O.; Assim, Z.; Jusoh, I.; Iya, N.I.D.; Asare, E.A. Vertical Profile of Heavy Metals Concentration in Sediments From Sadong River, Sarawak, Malaysia. Indian J. Environ. Prot. 2019, 39, 971–978. [Google Scholar]
  219. Sarmani, S.B. The Determination of Heavy Metals in Water, Suspended Materials and Sediments from Langat River, Malaysia. Hydrobiologia 1989, 176, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Shazili, N.A.M.; Yunus, K.; Ahmad, A.S.; Abdullah, N.; Rashid, M.K.A. Heavy Metal Pollution Status in the Malaysian Aquatic Environment. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manag. 2006, 9, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Sukri, S.; Aspin, S.; Kamarulzaman, N.; Jaafar, N.; Ghazi, R.M.; Ismail, N.; Ya’Acob, S.; Kedri, F.; Zakaria, M. Assessment of Metal Pollution Using Enrichment Factor (EF) and Pollution Load Index (PLI) in Sediments of Selected Terengganu Rivers, Malaysia. Malays. J. Fundam. Appl. Sci. 2018, 14, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Yunus, K.; My, N.; Azhar, N.; Shazili, M.; Chuan, O.; Saad, S. Heavy Metal Concentration in the Surface Sediment of Tanjung Lumpur Mangrove Forest, Kuantan, Malaysia. Sains Malays. 2011, 40, 89–92. [Google Scholar]
  223. Idriss, A.A.; Ahmad, A.K. Heavy Metal Concentrations (Cu, Cd and Pb) in Sediments in the Jura River, Penang, Malaysia. J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 12, 376–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  224. Baruddin, N.A.; Shazili, N.A.; Pradit, S. Sequential Extraction Analysis of Heavy Metals in Relation to Bioaccumulation in Mangrove, Rhizophora Mucronata from Kelantan Delta, Malaysia. AACL Bioflux 2017, 10, 172–181. [Google Scholar]
  225. Tan, K.; Denil, D.J.; Ransangan, J. Temporal and Spatial Variability of Heavy Metals in Marudu Bay, Malaysia. Oceanol. Hydrobiol. Stud. 2016, 45, 353–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Yunus, K.; Zuraidah, M.A.; John, A. A Review on the Accumulation of Heavy Metals in Coastal Sediment of Peninsular Malaysia. Ecofeminism Clim. Change 2020, 1, 21–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Elturk, M.; Abdullah, R.; Rozainah, M.Z.; Abu Bakar, N.K. Evaluation of Heavy Metals and Environmental Risk Assessment in the Mangrove Forest of Kuala Selangor Estuary, Malaysia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 136, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Monaci, F.; Bargagli, R. Barium and Other Trace Metals as Indicators of Vehicle Emissions. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 1997, 100, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Machado, W.; Moscatelli, M.; Rezende, L.G.; Lacerda, L.D. Mercury, Zinc, and Copper Accumulation in Mangrove Sediments Surrounding a Large Landfill in Southeast Brazil. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 120, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Guigue, J.; Mathieu, O.; Lévêque, J.; Denimal, S.; Steinmann, M.; Milloux, M.-J.; Grisey, H. Dynamics of Copper and Zinc Sedimentation in a Lagooning System Receiving Landfill Leachate. Waste Manag. 2013, 33, 2287–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Yap, C.K.; Edward, F.B.; Tan, S. Determination of Heavy Metal Distributions in the Green-Lipped Mussel Perna Viridis as Bioindicators of Heavy Metal Contamination in the Johore Straits and Senggarang, Peninsular Malaysia. Trends Appl. Sci. Res. 2007, 2, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Yap, C.K.; Nasir, S.M.; Edward, F.B.; Tan, S.G. Anthropogenic Inputs of Heavy Metals in the East Part of the Johore Straits as Revealed by Their Concentrations in the Different Soft Tissues of Perna Viridis (L.). Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 2012, 35, 827–834. [Google Scholar]
  233. Yap, C.K.; Shahbazi, A.; Zakaria, M.P. Concentrations of Heavy Metals (Cu, Cd, Zn and Ni) and PAHs in Perna Viridis Collected from Seaport and Non-Seaport Waters in the Straits of Johore. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2012, 89, 1205–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Ng, Y.J.E.; Yap, C.K.; Zakaria, M.P.; Tan, S.G. Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in the Straits of Johore by Using Transplanted Caged Mussel, Perna Viridis. Pertanika J. Sci. Technol. 2013, 21, 75–96. [Google Scholar]
  235. Ng, Y.J.E.; Yap, C.K.; Zakaria, M.P.; Aris, A.Z.; Tan, S.G. Trace Metals in the Shells of Mussels Perna Viridis Transplanted from Polluted to Relatively Unpolluted Sites in the Straits of Johore: Shells as Biomonitoring Materials. Asian J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Environ. Sci. Pap. 2013, 15, 5–8. [Google Scholar]
  236. Yap, C.K.; Ismail, A.; Edward, F.B.; Tan, S.G.; Siraj, S.S. Use of Different Soft Tissues of Perna Viridis a s Biomonitors of Bioavailability and Contamination by Heavy Metals (Cd, Cu, Fe, Pb, Ni, and Zn) in a Semi-Enclosed Intertidal Water, the Johore Straits. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2006, 88, 683–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Apodaca, D.C.; Ocampo, C.B.; Resubal, G.F.F.; Macalalad, E.M. Trace Metal Speciation in Sediments of Calancan Bay, Sta. Cruz, Marinduque, Philippines, SYLVATROP. Tech. J. Philipp. Ecosyst. Nat. Resour. 2013, 23, 21–52. [Google Scholar]
  238. Cabuga, C.C.; Rey, Y.C.; Jumawan, J.C. Levels of Heavy Metals in Fish and Sediments from Different Salinity Gradients of Lower Agusan River to Butuan Bay, Caraga, Philippines. EnvironmentAsia 2020, 13, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Decena, S.C.P.; Arguilles, M.S.; Robel, L.L. Assessing Heavy Metal Contamination in Surface Sediments in an Urban River in the Philippines. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2018, 27, 1983–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Nillos, M.G.; Taberna, H.; Sesbreño, R.S.; Pahila, I.; Okamoto, Y.; Añasco, N. Geochemical Speciation of Metals (Cu, Pb, Cd) in Fishpond Sediments in Batan Bay, Aklan, Philippines. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2020, 192, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Santiago, E.C.; Africa, C.R. Trace Metal Concentrations in the Aquatic Environment of Albay Gulf in the Philippines after a Reported Mine Tailings Spill. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2008, 56, 1657–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Sazon, R.R.; Migo, V.P. Metal Concentrations in Sediments of the Alinsaog River, Santa Cruz, Zambales, Central Luzon, Philippines. J. Health Pollut. 2020, 10, 914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Japitana, M.V.; Palconit, E.V.; Demetillo, A.T.; Taboada, E.B.; Burce, M.E.C. Potential Technologies for Monitoring the Fate of Heavy Metals in the Philippines: A Review. 37th Asian Conf. Remote Sens. ACRS 2016, 2, 1622–1632. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Flowchart of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) (adapted from Moher et al. [40]), used in the present study.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) (adapted from Moher et al. [40]), used in the present study.
Biology 11 00007 g001
Figure 2. Overall statistics of values (mean ± SE, and maximum) of concentrations (mg/kg dry weight) of Cu, Zn, and Pb, and their ecological risks (Er) and potential ecological risk index from the ASEAN-5 countries in the present study.
Figure 2. Overall statistics of values (mean ± SE, and maximum) of concentrations (mg/kg dry weight) of Cu, Zn, and Pb, and their ecological risks (Er) and potential ecological risk index from the ASEAN-5 countries in the present study.
Biology 11 00007 g002
Figure 3. The distribution levels of Cu, Pb, and Zn were reported from (a) the ASEAN-5 countries, and (b) their probabilities of percentages for comparison. The log10 Y-axis represents the metal concentrations (mg/kg dry weight) for both (a) and (b).
Figure 3. The distribution levels of Cu, Pb, and Zn were reported from (a) the ASEAN-5 countries, and (b) their probabilities of percentages for comparison. The log10 Y-axis represents the metal concentrations (mg/kg dry weight) for both (a) and (b).
Biology 11 00007 g003
Table 1. Comparison of geographical areas, population, and gross domestic product (GDP) in the ASEAN-5 countries.
Table 1. Comparison of geographical areas, population, and gross domestic product (GDP) in the ASEAN-5 countries.
Inland Area 1 (km2)Water Area 2 (km2)Population 3 (Million)GDP 2010 4 (Billions)GDP 2021 4 (Billions)Capture Fisheries Output 5 (Thousand Tons)Aquaculture Output 5 (Thousand Tons)
Indonesia1,811,56993,000273.5755.31167.261033849
Malaysia329,613119032.4258.6380.31489261
Philippines298,1701830109.6208.4398.32335815
Thailand510,890223069.8341.1536.818441057
Vietnam310,07021,14097.3143.3369.528043207
ASEAN-53,260,312119,390582.61706.62852.114,5759189
World148,940,000361,132,0007844.366,140.591,031.2--
Note: 1 Data is taken from the United Nations Statistics Division [3]; 2 Water area: the sum of the surface areas of all inland water bodies (lakes, reservoirs, and rivers) within international boundaries and coastlines. Coastal internal waters (some small bays) may be included [4]; 3 Worldometer [2]; 4 World Economic Outlook Database (WEO, October 2020). 5 Aquaculture and capture fisheries output among ASEAN members and top producer countries worldwide, 2013 [5].
Table 2. Concentrations (mg/kg dry weight) of Cu, Pb, and Zn reported from the ASEAN-5 countries obtained from the literature from 1981–2021.
Table 2. Concentrations (mg/kg dry weight) of Cu, Pb, and Zn reported from the ASEAN-5 countries obtained from the literature from 1981–2021.
CountryNo. LocationsCuZnPbReferences
Indonesia (N = 15)1minCoast of Pantai Ujung Watu (Central Java)2.100.601.10Razak [41] nS
2maxCoast of Pantai Ujung Watu (Central Java)29.69.3010.9Razak [41] nS
3meanJakarta Bay, Indonesia82.979.8438Soegiarto [42] nS
4minEstuaries of Brantas River and Solo River24.040.09.00Everaarts [18] S
5maxEstuaries of Brantas River and Solo River58.012223.0Everaarts [18] S
6minSemarang, Central Java12.353.75.20Widianarko et al. [43] S
7maxSemarang, Central Java44812572666Widianarko et al. [43] S
8minJakarta Bay13.068.017.0Williams et al. [44] S
9maxJakarta Bay25.095.028.0Williams et al. [44] S
10meanTelaga Tujuh Karimun, Riau Achipelago46.396.888.2Amin [45] nS
11meanBerau Delta16.56.1012.2Arifin [46] nS
12minDumai coast1.6131.514.6Amin et al. [19] S
13maxDumai coast13.887.184.9Amin et al. [19] S
14minJakarta Bay 201010.885.013.0Riyadi et al. [47] nS
15maxJakarta Bay 2010107845106Riyadi et al. [47] nS
16minJakarta Bay 20040.8253.93.64Rochyatun and Rozak [48] nS
17maxJakarta Bay 200474.749853.0Rochyatun and Rozak [48] nS
18meanJakarta Bay10.033.09.00Hosono et al. [49] S
19meanMahakam Delta, East Kalimantan27.718727.6Effendi et al. [17] S
20minriver and coast sediments of the Jakarta Bay14.864.23.00Sindern et al. [50] S
21maxriver and coast sediments of the Jakarta Bay3551130210Sindern et al. [50] S
NonS22minTanjung Jati power plant in Jepara District, Central Java6.982710.33Isworo and Oetari [51] nS
NonS23maxTanjung Jati power plant in Jepara District, Central Java11.06813.88Isworo and Oetari [51] nS
24meanNorth-West Coast of Kundur Island, Kepulauan Riau Province1.7011.5292Amin et al. [52] S
Thailand (N = 11)1minThe Upper Gulf of Thailand3.0035.020.0Menasveta and Cheevaparanapiwat [53] S
2maxThe Upper Gulf of Thailand37.095.0283Menasveta and Cheevaparanapiwat [53] S
3maxAo Ban Don and Pattani Bay70.0250424Everaarts and Swennen [54] nS
4meanRiver near Uthai District (Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya Province)20.060.022.0Mingkhwan and Worakhunpiset [55] S
5meanRiver Bangpa-in District (Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya Province)10070.016.0Mingkhwan and Worakhunpiset [55] S
6minPattany Bay22.575.079.4Everaarts et al. [56] nS
7maxPattany Bay26.9090.097.0Everaarts et al. [56] nS
8minUpper Gulf of Thailand, rivers of Mae Klong, Tha Chin, Chao Phraya, and Bang Pakong6.0018.013.0Qiao et al. [57] S
9maxUpper Gulf of Thailand, rivers of Mae Klong, Tha Chin, Chao Phraya, and Bang Pakong36.012736.0Qiao et al. [57] S
10meanChanthaburi Province7.4118.11.82Potipat et al. [58] S
11meanPattani Bay3.279.339.57Pradit et al. [59] S
12minWestern Gulf of Thailand2.201.634.13Liu et al. [60] S
13maxWestern Gulf of Thailand25.378.938.7Liu et al. [60] S
14minmangrove forest stems from Surat Thani Province2.907.508.15Pumijumnong and Danpradit [61] S
15maxmangrove forest stems from Surat Thani Province13.746.426.0Pumijumnong and Danpradit [61] S
16minMangrove Pattani Bay3.3030.4166Kaewtubtim et al. [13] S
17maxMangrove Pattani Bay18.739.8314Kaewtubtim et al. [13] S
18meanChao Phraya River in Bangkok21424062.6Wijaya et al. [62] S
Vietnam (N = 15)1minRivers in Hanoi37.093.043.0Ho and Egashira [63] nS
2maxRivers in Hanoi3094950361Ho and Egashira [63] nS
3meanPaddy field near Red River Delta193381340Phuong et al. [28] S
4meanCua Ong Habor, Ha Long Bay20.040.016.0Ho et al. [64] S
5minLang Co, Truong Giang, An Khe, Nuoc Man, Nuoc Ngot, Thi Nai, O Loan, Thuy Trieu and Dam Nai6.5831.017.4Romano et al. [15] nS
6maxLang Co, Truong Giang, An Khe, Nuoc Man, Nuoc Ngot, Thi Nai, O Loan, Thuy Trieu and Dam Nai28.692.033.8Romano et al. [15] nS
7minCua Ong, Ha Long13.012.04.00Tue et al. [65] S
8maxCua Ong, Ha Long30.094.041.0Tue et al. [65] S
9meanThe Cam River mouth (Haiphong Province), Red River System82.017892.0Ho et al. [66] S
10meanCam River-Mouth, Haiphong14.065.018.0Ho et al. [67] S
11meanNinh Hoa district central of Vietnam12.079.034.0Dung et al. [68] S
12minCai River estuary and Nha Trang Bay18.163.833.0Koukina et al. [16] S
13maxCai River estuary and Nha Trang Bay73.811886.2Koukina et al. [16] S
14minRed River20.040.027.0Nguyen et al. [69] S
15maxRed River332287188Nguyen et al. [69] S
16minThi Vai Estuary and in the Can Gio Mangrove Forest16.573.017.0Costa-Böddeker et al. [25] S
17maxThi Vai Estuary and in the Can Gio Mangrove Forest48.512725.0Costa-Böddeker et al. [25] S
18meanmangrove forest sediment in Ho Chi Minh City26.011326.0Dung et al. [26] S
19minTidal flats in the north of Vietnam from Quang Ninh to Ninh Binh provinces0.693.955.78Hoai et al. [70] S
20maxTidal flats in the north of Vietnam from Quang Ninh to Ninh Binh provinces94.8492120Hoai et al. [70] S
21minHa Long Bay3.806.3410.2Dang Hoai et al. [71] S
22maxHa Long Bay41.711969.9Dang Hoai et al. [71] S
23minDuyen Hai Seaport Area in Tra Vinh Province3.0782.965.3Tham et al. [72] S
24maxDuyen Hai Seaport Area in Tra Vinh Province9.1521285.2Tham et al. [72] S
East PM (N = 12)1meanPaka Estuary, Terengganu29.272.554.9Kamaruzzaman et al. [73] S
2meanMangrove forests of Terengganu31.120.810.5Kamaruzzaman et al. [73] nS
3meanKerteh mangrove Forest, Terengganu29.022.311.7Kamaruzzaman and Ong [74] S
4meanKelantan River, Kelantan6.7418.720.8Dasar et al. [75] S
5meanEast coast PM, South China Sea37.49.3044.3Rezaee Ebrahim Saraee et al. [76] S
6meanEast coast of Pahang0.690.750.29Redzwan et al. [77] S
7meanBidong Island, South China sea Cu19.361.320.5Ong et al. [78] nS
8meanBalok River, Pahang24.315929.3Mohd Zahari abdullah et al. [79] S
9meanSetiu Wetlands, Terengganu0.382.151.60Pradit et al. [59] S
10minKelantan River, Kelantan16.047.642.2Wang et al. [80] S
11maxKelantan River, Kelantan25.263.565.5Wang et al. [80] S
12maxTerengganu coast, Terengganu36.641.119.8Mohamed and Shazili [81] S
13meanKelantan riverine, Kelantan11.432.922.6Pooveneswary et al. [82] S
14meanKelantan nearshore area, Kelantan14.141.062.2Pooveneswary et al. [82] S
East Malaysia (N = 8)1minMengkabong lagoon, Sabah19.041.041.0Praveena et al. [83] S
2maxMengkabong lagoon, Sabah28.057.052.0Praveena et al. [83] S
3minForty-three sediment samples were collected from the beaches of Miri City, Sarawak28.817.910.5Nagarajan et al. [84] S
4maxForty-three sediment samples were collected from the beaches of Miri City, Sarawak71.328.319.7Nagarajan et al. [84] S
5meanKota Marudu, Sabah24845153.6Aris et al. [85] S
6meanMamut River, Sabah58361.423.5Muhammad Ali et al. [86] S
7meanTuaran, Sabah6.4922.02.63Tan et al. [87] nS
8minLiwagu River and Mansahaban River at Ranau Sabah8.0716.04.45Tair and Eduin [88] nS
9maxLiwagu River and Mansahaban River at Ranau Sabah39169.332.60Tair and Eduin [88] nS
10meanBaleh River, Sarawak19.955.07.55Chai et al. [89] nS
11maxSadong River, Sarawak0.096.270.07Asare et al. [90] nS
Straits of Johore (N = 4)1meanStraits of Johore, Johore4.4026.130.8Mat et al. [91] nS
2minStrait of Johor, Johore10.868.526.4Wood et al. [92] S
3maxStrait of Johor, Johore92.923169.9Wood et al., [92] S
4meanStrait of Johor, Johore57.821052.5Zulkifli et al. [10] S
5meanEastern part of the Straits of Johore (3 sites; 2004)11018033.6Yap et al. [93] S
6meanThe western part of the Straits of Johore (7 sites; 2004)28.613733.7Yap et al. [93] S
West PM (N = 41)1minPenang Island1.008.006.00Sivalingam et al. [94] nS
2maxPenang Island26.076.035.0Sivalingam et al. [94] nS
3meanJeram coast, Perak40.010048.0Everaarts and Swennen [54] nS
4minJuru, Prai Industrial Estate, Penang9.3073.520.8Seng et al. [95] S
5maxJuru, Prai Industrial Estate, Penang13.811033.0Seng et al. [95] S
6maxWest coast of Peninsular Malaysia9.99140045.0Ismail et al. [96] S
7minBintulu coast7.0039.011.0Ismail [96] S
8maxBintulu coast13.091.036.0Ismail [96] S
9minJuru River, Penang2.002.000.10Lim and Kiu [97] S
10maxJuru River, Penang144483117Lim and Kiu [97] S
11meanSepang Besar River, Selangor23.055.016.0Ismail and Ramli [7] S
12minPrai, Industrial Zone, Penang9.9930.322.2Ismail and Asmah [98] nS
13maxPrai, Industrial Zone, Penang63.451345.3Ismail and Asmah [98] nS
14minOffshore area of the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia 1998–1999 (20 sites)0.254.003.59Yap et al. [99,100] S
15maxOffshore area of the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia 1998–1999 (20 sites)13.879.125.4Yap et al. [99,100] S
16minIntertidal area of the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia 1999–2001 (26 sites)0.403.120.96Yap et al. [99,100] S
17maxIntertidal area of the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia 1999–2001 (26 sites)31530669.8Yap et al. [99,100] S
18minSouthwestern coast of Peninsular Malaysia 2005 (7 sites)3.4343.116.5Yap et al. [101] nS
19maxSouthwestern coast of Peninsular Malaysia 2005 (7 sites)15432467.8Yap et al. [101] nS
20minSri Serdang Industrial area drainage, Selangor43.016956.1Yap et al. [102] nS
21maxSri Serdang Industrial area drainage, Selangor551296404Yap et al. [102] nS
22minPolluted drainage sediments in the west part of Peninsular Malaysia (6 sites)87733057.4Yap et al. [103] nS
23maxPolluted drainage sediments in the west part of Peninsular Malaysia (6 sites)10194841267Yap et al. [103] nS
24minSix intertidal areas and four urban drainage sites, Selangor6.6450.226.0Yap et al. [104,105] S
25maxSix intertidal areas and four urban drainage sites, Selangor123336228Yap et al. [104,105] S
26meanJuru Estuary, Penang32.931730.2Yap and Tan [106] nS
27meanBeach sediment in Langkawi Island, Kedah6.0034.763.7Razi-Idris et al. [107] S
28meanJuru River, Penang32.053160.8Yap et al. [108] nS
29minKlang River Estuary, Selangor5.2946.430.4Yap et al. [109] S
30maxKlang River Estuary, Selangor53.920762.3Yap et al. [109] S
31minLangat River, Selangor5.2046.93.06Yap and Mohd Khairul [110] nS
32maxLangat River, Selangor12.377.78.17Yap and Mohd Khairul [110] nS
33minWest Port, Selangor7.4023.022.3Sany et al. [111] nS
34maxWest Port, Selangor27.698.380.0Sany et al. [111] nS
35minNorthern coastal sediments of Peninsular Malaysia (13 sites, 2005)4.7933.615.9Yap and Pang [31,32] S
36maxNorthern coastal sediments of Peninsular Malaysia (13 sites, 2005)32.931761.6Yap and Pang [31,32] S
37minNorthern drainage sediment of Peninsular Malaysia (5 sites, 2005)10.288.710.2Yap and Pang [31,32] S
38maxNorthern drainage sediment of Peninsular Malaysia (5 sites, 2005)120484126Yap and Pang [31,32] S
39meanSg. Buloh, Selangor34.794.037.3Nemati et al. [112] S
40maxUpstream Perak River, Perak19.151.327.0Salam et al. [113] S
41maxDownstream Perak River, Perak60.016160.8Salam et al. [113] S
42maxSungai Puloh mangrove, Klang, Selangor202651225Abubakar et al. [114] S
43maxJuru, Penang43.083.735.5Wood et al. [115] nS
44meanLangat River, Selangor5.7235.930.4Lim et al. [116] S
45meanKlang Straits (West Port, North Port, and South Port), Selangor17.451.159.5Sany et al. [8,29] S
46minPerlis River, Perlis7.3161.323.5Jamil et al. [117] nS
47maxPerlis River, Perlis35.912176.7Jamil et al. [117] nS
48meanLangat River, Selangor2.6829.715.5Shafie et al. [118] S
49meanWest coast of Negeri Sembilan and Melaka0.180.370.56Redzwan et al. [77] S
50meanPort Klang, Selangor6.8048.115.6Haris and Aris [119] S
51meanSungai Puloh mangrove, Klang, Selangor46.9102478.8Udechukwu et al. [9] S
52maxKlang River, Selangor52.927264.1Naji and Ismail [120] S
53minWest coast mangrove of Peninsular Malaysia 2011 (9 sites)5.5929.425.4Cheng and Yap [121] S
54maxWest coast mangrove of Peninsular Malaysia 2011 (9 sites)28.7130173Cheng and Yap [121] S
55minKlang coastal area (Kapar, Sungai Puloh, Sementa and North Port), Selangor3.2073.28.00Hamzan et al. [122] S
56maxKlang Coastal area (Kapar, Sungai Puloh, Sementa and North Port), Selangor10.212525.7Hamzan et al. [122] S
57minBayan Lepas Free Industrial Zone of Penang1.928.867.74Khodami et al. [123] S
58maxBayan Lepas Free Industrial Zone of Penang38710363.2Khodami et al. [123] S
59minLangat River, Selangor10.555.648.1Wong et al. [124] S
60maxLangat River, Selangor17.484.764.3Wong et al. [124] S
61meanKuala Selangor estuary, Selangor3.5576.628.8ELTurk et al. [125] S
62minNorthern Malacca Strait3.5030.18.88Shaari et al. [126] S
63maxNorthern Malacca Strait16.679.429.3Shaari et al. [126] S
64minMangrove sediments along the Selangor River, Selangor1.002158.83Nyangon et al. [127] S
65maxMangrove sediments along the Selangor River, Selangor10.625928.6Nyangon et al. [127] S
66meanMangrove sediment in the Klang estuary, Selangor9.3822.537.40ELTurk et al. [125] S
67minJuru estuary, Penang9.5672.115.1Yusoff et al. [128] S
68maxJuru estuary, Penang64.930459.5Yusoff et al. [128] S
Philippines (N = 7)1meanLaguna Lake(Laguna de Bay)10011410.4Vicente-Beckett [129,130] S
2minManila Bay32.060.06.00Prudente et al. [131] S
3maxManila Bay11832995.0Prudente et al. [131] S
4mina mine-tailings spill, Marinduque Island70613.043.0David [132] S
5maxa mine-tailings spill, Marinduque Island308027656.0David [132] S
6minManila Bay (core sediments)22.950.07.30Hosono et al. [14] S
7maxManila Bay (core sediments)38.696.019.0Hosono et al. [14] S
8minManila Bay (core sediments)56.774.68.69Olivares et al. [133] S
9maxManila Bay (core sediments)90.312226.6Olivares et al. [133] S
10minLaguna de Bay66.811220.4Elvira et al. [134] S
11maxLaguna de Bay14725164.9Elvira et al. [134] S
Note: PM = Peninsular Malaysia. S = Scopus; nS = non-Scopus.
Table 3. Reference values and exposure factors were employed to estimate the intake values and health risks of heavy metals in sediments for the present study.
Table 3. Reference values and exposure factors were employed to estimate the intake values and health risks of heavy metals in sediments for the present study.
FactorDefinitionUnitChildrenAdultsReferences
ABFDermal absorption factorunitless0.0010.001Chabukdhara and Nema [140]
AFSkin adherence factormg/cm day0.20.7US EPA [142]
ATAverage timedays365 × ED365 × EDUS EPA [137]
BWBody weight of the exposed individualkg1555.9Beijing Quality and Technology Supervision Bureau [143]
EDExposure durationyears624USEPA [139]
EFExposure frequencydays/year350350Beijing Quality and Technology Supervision Bureau [143]
IngRIngestion rate of soilmg/day200100USEPA [139]
PEFParticle emission factorm3/kg1.36 × 1091.36 × 109USEPA [139]
SAExposed skin surface areacm216004350Beijing Quality and Technology Supervision Bureau (2009)
Table 4. Overall statistics of values of concentrations (mg/kg dry weight) of Cu, Zn, and Pb, and their concentration factors (Cf) and ecological risks (ER) from the present study.
Table 4. Overall statistics of values of concentrations (mg/kg dry weight) of Cu, Zn, and Pb, and their concentration factors (Cf) and ecological risks (ER) from the present study.
Indonesia (N = 24)CuZnPbCu CfZn CfPb CfCu ERZn ERPb ERPERI
Minimum0.820.600.330.060.010.020.290.010.101.07
Maximum4481257266631.324.215715724.2784965
Mean58.12421724.064.6510.120.34.6550.575.4
Median15.782.415.81.091.580.935.471.584.6515.9
SD1103645417.717.0131.938.57.01159196
SE22.574.41101.571.436.517.871.4332.5340.1
Skewness2.781.784.322.781.784.322.781.784.324.12
Kurtosis6.521.8317.46.521.8317.46.521.8317.416.2
Thailand (N = 18)CuZnPbCu CfZn CfPb CfCu ERZn ERPb ERPERI
Minimum2.201.631.820.150.030.110.770.030.542.02
Maximum21425042415.04.8124.974.84.81125154
Mean34.071.890.12.381.385.3011.91.3826.539.8
Median19.453.231.01.361.021.826.761.029.1223.7
SD51.771.81253.621.387.3418.11.3836.744.0
SE12.216.929.40.850.331.734.260.338.6510.4
Skewness2.611.521.612.611.521.612.611.521.611.27
Kurtosis6.361.451.306.371.451.306.361.451.300.60
Vietnam (N = 24)CuZnPbCu CfZn CfPb CfCu ERZn ERPb ERPERI
Minimum0.693.954.000.050.080.240.240.081.182.02
Maximum332495036123.295.221.211695.2106309
Mean59.732373.34.186.214.3120.96.2121.648.7
Median23.092.533.91.611.782.008.041.789.9721.8
SD90.599295.46.3319.15.6131.719.128.172.3
SE18.520319.51.293.901.156.463.905.7314.8
Skewness2.194.492.162.194.492.162.194.492.162.49
Kurtosis3.5918.43.693.5918.43.693.5918.43.695.57
Malaysia (N = 99)CuZnPbCu CfZn CfPb CfCu ERZn ERPb ERPERI
Minimum0.090.370.070.010.010.000.030.010.020.17
Maximum10191400126771.326.974.535626.9373738
Mean70.014555.74.892.783.2824.472.7816.443.6
Median17.469.330.41.221.331.796.091.338.9417.1
SD16421013411.44.047.8957.24.0439.590.2
SE16.421.113.51.150.410.795.750.413.979.06
Skewness3.993.337.763.993.337.763.993.337.765.41
Kurtosis16.914.266.016.914.266.016.914.266.035.4
Philippines (N = 11)CuZnPbCu CfZn CfPb CfCu ERZn ERPb ERPERI
Minimum22.950.06.001.600.960.358.010.961.7611.1
Maximum308032995.02156.335.5910776.3327.91099
Mean40514732.528.32.821.911422.829.55154
Median90.311420.46.312.191.2031.572.196.0040.2
SD90894.128.963.51.811.703171.818.51321
SE27428.48.7319.10.550.5195.70.552.5796.8
Skewness2.640.900.992.640.900.992.640.900.992.62
Kurtosis5.31−0.65−0.145.31−0.65−0.145.31−0.65−0.145.25
ASEAN-5 (N = 176)CuZnPbCu CfZn CfPb CfCu ERZn ERPb ERPERI
Minimum0.090.370.070.010.010.000.030.010.020.17
Maximum30804950266621595.2157107795.27841099
Mean84.217576.05.893.374.4729.53.3722.455.2
Median20.074.829.01.401.441.716.991.448.5419.5
SD26842223018.88.1113.693.98.1167.8131
SE20.231.817.41.410.611.027.070.615.119.88
Skewness8.538.709.038.538.709.038.538.709.035.81
Kurtosis87.892.393.187.8192.393.187.892.393.138.1
Note: PM = Peninsular Malaysia.
Table 5. Overall statistics of values of hazard quotient ingestion (HQing), hazard quotient dermal (HQdermal), and hazard index (HI) of Cu, Pb, and Zn for children and adults from ASEAN-5 (N = 176) were obtained in the present study.
Table 5. Overall statistics of values of hazard quotient ingestion (HQing), hazard quotient dermal (HQdermal), and hazard index (HI) of Cu, Pb, and Zn for children and adults from ASEAN-5 (N = 176) were obtained in the present study.
CuChildren HQingChildren HQdermalChildren HIAdult HQingAdult HQdermalAdult HI
Minimum2.95 × 10−51.57 × 10−72.97 × 10−53.96 × 10−64.02 × 10−74.36 × 10−6
Maximum1.015.38 × 10−31.011.35 × 10−11.37 × 10−21.49 × 10−1
Mean2.76 × 10−21.47 × 10−42.77 × 10−23.70 × 10−33.76 × 10−44.08 × 10−3
Median6.55 × 10−33.50 × 10−56.59 × 10−38.79 × 10−48.93 × 10−59.69 × 10−4
SD8.80 × 10−24.69 × 10−48.81 × 10−21.18 × 10−21.19 × 10−31.30 × 10−2
SE6.63 × 10−33.53 × 10−56.64 × 10−38.88 × 10−49.01 × 10−59.79 × 10−4
Skewness8.548.548.508.518.528.52
Kurtosis8.79 × 108.78 × 108.73 × 108.75 × 108.75 × 108.76 × 10
PbChildren HQingChildren HQdermalChildren HIAdult HQingAdult HQdermalAdult HI
Minimum2.59 × 10−42.80 × 10−62.62 × 10−43.48 × 10−57.14 × 10−64.19 × 10−5
Maximum9.871.07 × 10−19.981.322.72 × 10−11.60
Mean2.81 × 10−13.04 × 10−32.84 × 10−13.77 × 10−27.75 × 10−34.55 × 10−2
Median1.08 × 10−11.16 × 10−31.09 × 10−11.44 × 10−22.97 × 10−31.74 × 10−2
SD8.53 × 10−19.23 × 10−38.62 × 10−11.14 × 10−12.35 × 10−21.38 × 10−1
SE6.43 × 10−26.96 × 10−46.50 × 10−28.60E-031.77 × 10−31.04 × 10−2
Skewness9.039.059.039.019.039.04
Kurtosis9.31 × 109.36 × 109.31 × 109.28 × 109.32 × 109.33 × 10
ZnChildren HQingChildren HQdermalChildren HIAdult HQingAdult HQdermalAdult HI
Minimum1.62 × 10−51.29 × 10−71.63 × 10−52.17 × 10−63.30 × 10−72.50 × 10−6
Maximum2.16 × 10−11.73 × 10−32.18 × 10−12.90 × 10−24.42 × 10−33.34 × 10−2
Mean7.65 × 10−36.12E × 10−57.71 × 10−31.03 × 10−31.56 × 10−41.18 × 10−3
Median3.27 × 10−32.62 × 10−53.29 × 10−34.39 × 10−46.67 × 10−55.06 × 10−4
SD1.84 × 10−21.47 × 10−41.86 × 10−22.47 × 10−33.77 × 10−42.85 × 10−3
SE1.39 × 10−31.11 × 10−51.40 × 10−31.86 × 10−42.84 × 10−52.15 × 10−4
Skewness8.708.718.708.708.718.70
Kurtosis9.22 × 109.24 × 109.23 × 109.23 × 109.24 × 109.22 × 10
Note: Values in bold indicate HQ values > 1.0; PM = Peninsular Malaysia.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yap, C.K.; Al-Mutairi, K.A. Ecological-Health Risk Assessments of Heavy Metals (Cu, Pb, and Zn) in Aquatic Sediments from the ASEAN-5 Emerging Developing Countries: A Review and Synthesis. Biology 2022, 11, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11010007

AMA Style

Yap CK, Al-Mutairi KA. Ecological-Health Risk Assessments of Heavy Metals (Cu, Pb, and Zn) in Aquatic Sediments from the ASEAN-5 Emerging Developing Countries: A Review and Synthesis. Biology. 2022; 11(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11010007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yap, Chee Kong, and Khalid Awadh Al-Mutairi. 2022. "Ecological-Health Risk Assessments of Heavy Metals (Cu, Pb, and Zn) in Aquatic Sediments from the ASEAN-5 Emerging Developing Countries: A Review and Synthesis" Biology 11, no. 1: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11010007

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop