Next Article in Journal
Diversity of Culturable Bacteria from Endemic Medicinal Plants of the Highlands of the Province of Parinacota, Chile
Previous Article in Journal
Non-Trivial Dynamics in the FizHugh–Rinzel Model and Non-Homogeneous Oscillatory-Excitable Reaction-Diffusions Systems
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

In Vitro Characterization of chIFITMs of Aseel and Kadaknath Chicken Breeds against Newcastle Disease Virus Infection

Biology 2023, 12(7), 919; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12070919
by Muthusamy Malarmathi 1,*, Nagarajan Murali 1, Mani Selvaraju 1, Karuppusamy Sivakumar 2, Vasudevan Gowthaman 3, Vadivel Balasubramanian Raghavendran 1, Angamuthu Raja 1, Sunday O. Peters 4 and Aranganoor Kannan Thiruvenkadan 5,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Biology 2023, 12(7), 919; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12070919
Submission received: 21 April 2023 / Revised: 14 June 2023 / Accepted: 24 June 2023 / Published: 27 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Infection Biology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In the manuscript " In-Vitro characterization of chIFITMs of Aseel and Kadaknath 2 chicken breeds against Newcastle disease virus infection" the authors have characterised chIFITMs of Aseel and Kadaknath chicken breeds against Newcastle disease virus infection. Kadaknath is known for its resistance to ND, and the current manuscript authors are trying to address it with interesting findings. But some more critical corrections are needed before accepting the manuscript. 

 

Major point:

  1. The study lacks control, and It Should include the CEF of a susceptible chicken or DF1 cell line as a standard control. 
  2. The authors believe that 'CEF cells start expressing all chIFITM genes significantly in the early stage of infection, regardless of the breed of the chicken’ What about IFN pretreatment and fold change I believe that IFN vs NDV in both dose-dependent manner would address their claims. 
  3. Is there any sequence difference in chIFITMs between these breeds?
  4. Microscopy images are very poor quality; they should be replaced. Scale is missing in all the images. Authors should use a better microscope with phase contrast. 

Some minor points

  1. In simple summary, the authors should add more points about the results. The sentence ‘The genes Chicken Interferon Inducible Transmembrane Proteins (chIFITM), which produces chicken interferon-inducible transmembrane proteins,’ is a bit repetitive. Kindly rephrase the sentence.
  2. Formatting errors, minor English editions

minor English editions

Author Response

Dear Sir

Thank you for reviewing and i have enclosed the reply for the comments for your kind perusal

kind regards

a.k.thiruvenkadan

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors conducted an important study on the immune response of fibroblasts in two chicken breeds. The staging of the experiment is logical and reasonable. However, it is not clear how many embryos were taken for the experiment? The genetic basis of the variability of the studied genes is of interest. Were there such studies on these breeds?  It would be desirable to add such information to the discussion or to the results, as conclusions were made about the genetic resistance to diseases of the Kadaknath breed. After making corrections, the article will be ready for publication.

Author Response

Dear sir

Thank your for the comments and I have corrected the same reply for your kind perusal

kr

a.k.thiruvenkadan

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The paper, “In-Vitro characterization of chIFITMs of Aseel and Kadaknath chicken breeds against Newcastle disease virus infection” by Muthusamy Malarmathi et al. analyzed the level of chIFITM, MX and IFN-γ gene expression against the Newcastle disease virus (NDV) in chicken embryo fibroblast cells of Aseel and Kadaknath 2 chicken. The experimental design and data are clear, but the innovation is insufficient.

Major issues:

The relationship between chIFITM and NDV has been documented in a few papers(PMID: 33762417, PMID: 30566670, PMID: 28435159).

In Abstract, the authors mentioned that “The result suggests that the Kadaknath chicken breed may have a higher level of disease tolerance compared to the Aseel chicken. ”. The data presented in this study was obtained at the cellular level using CEF cells. However, immune responses in an organism are complex processes. Therefore, to draw this conclusion, it is recommended to conduct animal experiments.

Minor issues:

1.     Figure 3 need a higher resolution version.

2.     Line 72: “influenza virus and its titre in in vitro study” should be “influenza virus and its titer in vitro study”.

3.     Line 334: “because it is a one of” should be “because it is one of”.

 

4.     Line 61-62: Please double check the exchange rate between the US dollar and the Indian rupee.

Minor editing of English language required.

Author Response

Dear sir

thank you for the comments and I have enclosed the reply for your kind perusal

a.k.thiruvenkadan

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I would appreciate the authors for the present work. The Kadaknath chicken breed is known for its resistance to viral infection, the present study shows a possible mechanism. 

Reviewer 3 Report

The revision looks good.

Back to TopTop