1. Introduction
Lower body negative pressure (LBNP) serves as a countermeasure against the headward fluid shift in microgravity during spaceflight [
1]. It is also commonly used to assess an individual’s cardiovascular stability during central hypovolemia, which occurs during prolonged standing and hemorrhage. By shifting blood from the upper to lower parts, particularly the pelvis, legs, and extravascular space, LBNP reduces the central venous pressure and venous return [
2]. Reported differences in orthostatic tolerance across males and females have been documented. Goswami et al. reported that women have lower central hypovolemia tolerance [
3]. Although the data regarding the lower tolerance in women is established [
4,
5], the reasons behind this discrepancy remain partially elusive.
While the effects of LBNP on physiological responses and large arteries have been widely reported, there is almost no literature regarding how these cephalad fluid shifts affect the microvasculature. The present study evaluated retinal microcirculation parameters, especially as previous studies have reported that changes in the small vessels of the retina precede changes in larger vessels. [
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14,
15]. While constriction of the retinal vessels is seen in hypertension [
8,
9,
10], retinal arteriolar constriction and venular dilatation have been shown to predict coronary heart disease and stroke [
11,
12,
13,
14,
15]. Retinal imaging was used in this study, as it has emerged as a valid, rapid, and cost-effective method for early cardiovascular abnormality detection, which could potentially be used during application of LBNP or in space missions. While previous studies have linked microcirculation and sepsis [
16,
17,
18,
19,
20], none examined LBNP. The present study attempted to fill this research gap regarding LBNP and microcirculation by exploring how LBNP levels (−10, −20, −30, and −40 mmHg) and sex (males and females) influence retinal microcirculation in young, healthy individuals. We hypothesized that variations in retinal microcirculation parameters across the protocol (baseline, different LBNP levels, and recovery) and between the sexes would be seen.
2. Methods
The present study was performed at the Division of Physiology, Medical University of Graz, Austria. Approval for the study was obtained from the Ethics committee of the Medical University of Graz, Austria (Ref: EK 25-551 ex 12/13). All the data were collected in accordance with Good Clinical Practice standards, and the study design was compliant with the Declaration of Helsinki of WMA (2013). All the participants received information about the study and provided written consent prior to participation. The signed consent forms are stored at the Division of Physiology, Medical University of Graz.
2.1. Sample Size Calculation
Using the typical retinal vascular changes from our previous studies [
21,
22] with an error probability (α) of 0.05 and a power (1 − ß) of 0.80, we estimated that the required number of participants was 20. Considering a possible dropout rate of 20%, we recruited forty-two adult participants (20 males, 22 females; age: 24.9 ± 5.9 years; BMI: 21.8 ± 25 kg/m
2). Of these, complete data sets were available for twenty-seven participants (
n = 11 males;
n = 16 females).
2.2. Participants
Forty-two adult participants (20 males, 22 females; age: 24.9 ± 5.9 years; BMI: 21.8 ± 25 kg/m
2) took part in this study. The protocol of the study was explained to the participants by the department staff. A simplified overview of the study flow can be seen in
Figure 1. The detailed protocol of the study and the applied inclusion and exclusion criteria are described in Shankhwar et al. [
23].
2.3. LBNP Protocol
The participants were measured at six-time points: at baseline supine, four times at gradually increasing negative pressures (−10 mmHg, −20 mmHg, −30 mmHg, and −40 mmHg, LBNP was increased by 10 mmHg every 4 min), and finally, during a recovery period (
Figure 1). All the measurements were performed in the same room and by the same operator at the Division of Physiology, Medical University of Graz. The parameters of the microcirculation used for evaluating cardiovascular health were collected using retinal imaging. This study was part of a larger project that also examined other parameters, such as heart rate, blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, stroke index, cardiac index, total peripheral resistance index, and low-frequency and high-frequency RRI band power derived from the heart rate variability signal [
23].
2.4. Microcirculation Measurements
The optic disc-focused retinal images were acquired by a hand-held, portable 30° field-of-view digital retinal camera, Optomed Aurora (Optomed Oy, Oulu, Finland), by the same trained researcher at six time points. Another trained researcher who was blinded to the study participants analyzed the retinal images using MONA REVA software (version 2.1.1,VITO, Mol, Belgium; [
24]). For further details, see Saloň et al. [
21]. The retinal microcirculation parameters were as follows: central retinal arteriolar equivalent (CRAE), central retinal venular equivalent (CRVE), and artery-to-vein ratio (AVR).
2.5. Statistical Analysis
All the data were tested for normality of the distribution using the Shapiro–Wilks test, and the cases that largely deviated from the group mean and/or the missing data were excluded. Due to the small number of complete data sets, only the baseline, LBNP-40, and recovery measurements were included in the statistical analyses. Repeated measures ANOVAs were performed with sex as the between-subjects factor and three evaluated time points (baseline, LBNP-40, and recovery) as within-subjects factors to analyze changes in CRAE and CRVE. For pairwise comparisons between the different conditions (baseline, LBNP40, recovery), the significance level was adjusted according to Bonferroni. All the data were analyzed using SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0., Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp).
3. Results
Six (14.3%) out of the forty-two participants dropped out (did not finish the protocol) of this study. The baseline characteristics of the participants divided based on sex are shown in
Table 1. Retinal images were collected from thirty-seven participants. After the exclusion of low-quality images that were unfit for analysis, complete datasets were available for
n = 27 participants. All the results in the present manuscript were obtained by analyzing those 27 participants (
Table 1).
Retinal Microcirculation Measurements
Table 2 displays the values of the retinal microvascular parameters for three analyzed measurement time points divided based on sex.
Considering the CRAE, no significant changes between the baseline, LBNP-40, and recovery (F (2,50) = 0.579, p = 0.564) were found. Although the females showed higher values of CRAE, the effect was not significant (F (1,25) = 2.231, p = 0.148). The interaction between LBNP and sex was also found to not be significant (F (2,50) = 0.088, p = 0.916).
Like CRAE, there were no significant changes between the baseline, LBNP-40, or recovery (F (2,50) = 0.317, p = 0.730), or between the sexes (F (1,25) = 0.485, p = 0.492) in CRVE. Moreover, no interaction was found between these two factors (F (2,50) = 0.076, p = 0.927). Similarly, as for the two previous variables, there were no significant changes between the baseline, LBNP-40, or recovery (F (2,50) = 0.570, p = 0.569), or between the sexes (F (1,25) = 0.531, p = 0.473) in AVR.
4. Discussion
The aim of this study was to investigate changes in retinal microcirculation parameters in healthy male and female participants at rest and during LBNP-induced central hypovolemia. This study showed no significant differences in CRAE and CRVE, either during LBNP or between male and female participants.
4.1. Retinal Microcirculation Measurements
The CRAE showed no significant changes between the baseline, LBNP40, or recovery conditions. Based on these results, the null hypothesis that the LBNP-induced fluid shift does not significantly change the CRAE cannot be rejected, because the measured parameters did not show the expected decrease in arteriolar diameter (decrease in CRAE). Exploratory analyses of the lower-grade negative pressures showed an expected decrease in CRAE from the baseline to LBNP10 and from LBNP10 to LBNP20. However, they also showed a paradoxical increase in CRAE from LBNP20 to LBNP30, reaching a maximum CRAE in LBNP40, then decreasing again in the recovery phase, reaching values close to the baseline measurements. However, none of these changes were significant. Nonetheless, the increased CRAE in LBNP40 (maximal negative pressure during this study) was an unexpected result, because one would expect reflex vasoconstriction and a decrease in CRAE. Because the effect of venule contraction in the hypovolemic state is less well established compared to the arteriolar contraction, these changes are not as unexpected as the changes in CRAE. An expected normal response in a person without cardiovascular problems (such as in our study participants, who were all healthy) would be an increased venous tone, which increases the venous return and thus the preload. This effect appears to be most relevant in the splanchnic venous system, which serves as a pool of blood that can be recruited during hypovolemia [
25,
26]. It appears that retinal veins may not play a significant role in maintaining a higher venous return during central hypovolemia.
One possible explanation for the non-significant changes observed in the microcirculatory blood vessel diameter could be attributed to the intricate nature of microcirculatory regulation mechanisms within the central nervous system and the retina. A study conducted by Bill et al. examined the control of the retinal blood flow, which exhibits similar flow control patterns to cerebral perfusion in healthy individuals. Additionally, the retinal microcirculation has the highest density of microvascular pericytes. However, retinal circulation lacks autonomic innervation and depends solely on local vasogenic factors like endothelin, a vasoconstrictor [
27]. Similar to the blood–brain barrier, the blood–retina barrier safeguards the retinal cells from alterations in the composition of peripheral blood [
27,
28]. This suggests that the absence of a correlation between changes in peripheral circulation parameters, like retinal microcirculation, may be attributed to the differential control systems in operation. While the autonomic nervous system primarily regulates the peripheral circulatory system, retinal vessels are predominantly influenced by local vasogenic factors. Therefore, the lack of correlation between the retinal responses during hypovolemia with the observed systemic cardiovascular changes in the present study may be attributed to the absence of autonomic innervation and local vessel control. A study by Koep et al. (2022) further highlights significant differences in the regulation of cerebral and peripheral circulation. The authors suggest that extrapolating the regulation of cerebral vasculature based on peripheral sympathetic nerve activity is not appropriate. Contrarily, cerebral sympathetic nerve activity appears to have an opposing effect compared to peripheral circulation, and its modulation is mediated by changes in intracranial pressure and cerebral blood volume [
29]. In the peripheral circulation, sympathetic nerve activity typically results in vasoconstriction of arteries and veins, leading to decreased blood flow. Sympathetic nerve activity in the cerebral circulation can lead to both vasoconstriction and vasodilation, depending on receptor density, distribution, the presence of other vasoactive compounds, and neurotransmitter release. Additionally, the distribution and types of adrenoreceptors in cerebral vessels vary across different regions, indicating region-specific autonomic regulation of cerebral blood flow [
29]. These findings reinforce the notion that the regulation of circulation is multifaceted, underscoring the complexity of cerebral blood flow regulation.
Conversely, reports of data with significant changes in the retinal microcirculation can be found; however, it must be noted that the cardiovascular stress during these studies was more drastic than that of the LBNP protocol used in this study, as most of the obtained data in those studies involved models of septic and hemorrhagic shock. A study conducted by Jurate Simkiene et al. examined changes in retinal microcirculation in patients with sepsis or septic shock compared to healthy individuals. The results showed a significantly higher CRAE during sepsis or in septic shock patients, indicating altered hemodynamic states. However, the CRVE and AVR did not differ significantly between the two groups [
19]. This study aligns closely with the methods employed in our LBNP study and suggests that CRAE changes can be observed and correlated with hemodynamic alterations, particularly in septic shock. While there are similarities in the hemodynamic changes observed in septic shock and hypovolemia, it is important to note that they are not identical. In septic shock, the primary mechanism is decreased vascular tone, leading to vasodilation and impaired tissue perfusion. On the other hand, hypovolemia involves a decrease in intravascular volume accompanied by increased vascular tone, which aims to compensate for the reduced blood volume by constricting blood vessels. These distinct mechanisms highlight the different underlying pathophysiologies between septic shock and hypovolemia, despite some overlapping hemodynamic changes. Retinal fluorescein angiography performed by Erikson et al. (2017) in patients with sepsis revealed pathological retinal changes associated with arterial blood flow slowdown, such as vitreous changes, retinal hemorrhages, and fluorescein-leaking microaneurysms. Bilateral involvement was observed in 75% of the cases [
20]. These findings further support the notion that retinal microcirculatory changes can be observed in hemodynamic disturbances like sepsis, although fluorescein angiography may provide better visualization compared to measuring vessel diameters. It is important to note that while our study induced a state of hypovolemia rather than a shock-like state, the mentioned studies on septic shock are relevant.
4.2. Differences in Males vs. Females
The data analysis carried out in this study did not reveal any significant differences in the retinal vessel diameters (CRAE, CRVE, or AVR) between the male and female participants during the three evaluated time points (baseline, LBNP-40, and recovery). This suggests that sex did not influence the response of retinal vessels to LBNP, contrary to our initial hypothesis. While there was a trend of higher CRAE values in the female participants throughout the study, this difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, the changes in CRAE were identical in males and females during the study protocol. We speculate that the tendency towards a higher arteriolar tone observed in males, indicated by a lower CRAE, may contribute to their enhanced orthostatic tolerance and stronger vasoconstrictor response compared to females. This notion is supported by several studies, including the work of Huxley et al., which suggests that females tend to exhibit an increase in HR rather than SVR in response to orthostatic challenges, whereas males show the opposite pattern [
30]. However, it is important to note that our study did not reveal a significant difference in CRAE between males and females. Therefore, our findings do not directly confirm or refute this hypothesis. Further research specifically focusing on the relationship between retinal vessel diameters, arteriolar tone, orthostatic tolerance, and sex differences would be valuable in providing a more comprehensive understanding of these phenomena. While exploratory analyses revealed that the female participants exhibited a tendency towards higher CRVE throughout all the LBNP phases, except for the LBNP10 phase where the male CRVE was higher, these differences did not reach statistical significance. It could be speculated that the presence of more dilated venules in females might lead to a decrease in venous return, resulting in lower preload and decreased orthostatic tolerance, which is typically more common in females. However, since our study did not demonstrate a significant difference in CRVE, we cannot substantiate this hypothesis. Regarding the AVR, it had a tendency to be higher in the female participants, likely attributed to the overall higher CRAE in the females compared to the males. Nevertheless, these differences in AVR were not statistically significant. Although no studies linking retinal AVR to changes in orthostatic tolerance could be found, a lower AVR generally correlates to a higher blood pressure and various cardiovascular risk factors (including BMI, sex, and age). AVR is usually lower in males and in the older population [
31,
32,
33].
Further studies are required to gain more insight into potential sex differences in microcirculation during LBNP. Future studies could also include additional data, which could provide valuable insights into the underlying molecular biology and/or mechanisms underlying such changes. For instance, recent bulk transcriptomics studies, which could represent a strong substrate to enforce the role of previously described molecular mechanisms such as the recent studies with PMID: 36290689, PMID: 36490268, and PMID: 32184807, could be incorporated into future measurements and research.
5. Limitations
A small sample size could be considered one limitation of our study. However, we do not believe that this is the case, as we carried out a sample size calculation prior to starting the study. Due to difficulties in retinal image acquisition and analysis, complete data sets (baseline, LBNP40, and recovery) from twenty-seven out of the forty-two participants were available for final evaluation. This is in accordance with our sample size calculations, which estimated a minimum participant number of 24 to obtain 80% power.
We observed a lack of correlation in the retinal responses during hyovolemia with the observed systemic cardiovacular changes. It is possible that the lack of autonomic innervation and local control of retinal vessels could have contributed to these results. Future studies should explore this in more detail.
In addition, a maximum LBNP of −40 mmHg was used in the present study, which corresponds to the stress experienced while standing upright [
3]. Several studies have used LBNP levels of ≥−50 mmHg [
4,
34]. Greater negative pressures could lead to more drastic changes in retinal microcirculation parameters, which could be more similar to those seen in studies on septic and hemorrhagic shock.
Finally, the analysis of retinal images was a highly subjective process which frequently required manual adjustments, which is a potential source of error that might have influenced the results. We do not believe this is the case, as the complete data analysis was performed by the same professionally trained grader (AS).
6. Conclusions and Future Directions
The present study examined how the LBNP protocol, utilizing a maximum negative pressure of −40 mmHg, influences retinal microcirculation parameters in healthy young individuals. Graded LBNP application did not lead to changes in the retinal microvasculature across the sexes. The present study is the first in the given area that attempted to capture changes in retinal microcirculation caused by central hypovolemia during LBNP. However, further research is needed with higher LBNP levels, including those that can induce pre-fainting (presyncope), to fully understand how the retinal microcirculation adapts during complete cardiovascular collapse (e.g., during hypovolemic shock) and/or during severe hemorrhage. Additionally, future research should include retinal blood flow and velocity measures alongside vessel diameters for a more comprehensive understanding. Finally, integrating additional data in future studies can provide valuable insights into the underlying molecular biology and mechanisms driving these changes.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, N.G. and A.B.; methodology, A.S., B.S., A.H., K.S.-Z., A.B. and N.G.; data collection, A.S., B.S., A.H., A.B., V.P. and K.S.-Z.; validation, N.G.; assessment and data processing, A.S., K.S.-Z., J.U. and N.V.; formal analysis, A.S., K.S.-Z., J.U. and N.V.; data curation, A.S. and K.S.-Z.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S. and N.V.; writing—review and editing, A.S., B.S., K.S.-Z., N.V., A.H., A.B., J.U., V.P., V.S. and N.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the European Space Agency (Ref. No: 4000137614/22/NL/SC). The Doctoral School of Translational Molecular and Cellular Bioscience at the Medical University of Graz, Austria supported the open access fees of this publication.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Study approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Medical University of Graz, Austria (Ref: EK 25-551 ex 12/13). All the data were collected in accordance with Good Clinical Practice standards, and the study design was compliant with the Declaration of Helsinki of WMA (2013).
Informed Consent Statement
All the participants received information about the study and provided written consent prior to participation.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated from the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by the European Space Agency. We thank all the participants for their time and cooperation. We sincerely thank the Doctoral School of Translational Molecular and Cellular Bioscience at the Medical University of Graz for their vital resources that significantly contributed to the completion of this publication.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Hargens, A.R.; Whalen, R.T.; Watenpaugh, D.E.; Schwandt, D.F.; Krock, L.P. Lower body negative pressure to provide load bearing in space. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 1991, 62, 934–937. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Moore, T.P.; Thornton, W.E. Space shuttle inflight and postflight fluid shifts measured by leg volume changes. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 1987, 58, A91-6. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Goswami, N.; Blaber, A.P.; Hinghofer-Szalkay, H.; Convertino, V.A. Lower Body Negative Pressure: Physiological Effects, Applications, and Implementation. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 807–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goswami, N.; Evans, J.; Schneider, S.; von der Wiesche, M.; Mulder, E.; Rössler, A.; Hinghofer-Szalkay, H.; Blaber, A.P. Effects of Individualized Centrifugation Training on Orthostatic Tolerance in Men and Women. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Convertino, V.A.; Schlotman, T.E.; Akers, K.S.; Nessen, S.C.; Mansur, D.E.; Campos, M.O.; Mattos, J.D.; Paiva, A.C.S.; Rocha, M.P.; Videira, R.L.R.; et al. Gender differences in autonomic functions associated with blood pressure regulation. Am. J. Physiol. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 1998, 275, R1909–R1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deciuceis, C.; Porteri, E.; Rizzoni, D.; Rizzardi, N.; Paiardi, S.; Boari, G.E.; Miclini, M.; Zani, F.; Muiesan, M.L.; Donato, F.; et al. Structural Alterations of Subcutaneous Small-Resistance Arteries May Predict Major Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Hypertension. Am. J. Hypertens. 2007, 20, 846–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rizzoni, D.; Porteri, E.; Boari, G.E.; De Ciuceis, C.; Sleiman, I.; Muiesan, M.L.; Castellano, M.; Miclini, M.; Agabiti-Rosei, E. Prognostic Significance of Small-Artery Structure in Hypertension. Circulation 2003, 108, 2230–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, T.Y.; Klein, R.; Sharrett, A.R.; Duncan, B.B.; Couper, D.J.; Klein, B.E.; Hubbard, L.D.; Nieto, F.J. For the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study Retinal Arteriolar Diameter and Risk for Hypertension. Ann. Intern. Med. 2004, 140, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ikram, M.K.; Witteman, J.C.; Vingerling, J.R.; Breteler, M.M.; Hofman, A.; de Jong, P.T. Retinal Vessel Diameters and Risk of Hypertension. Hypertension 2006, 47, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanabe, Y.; Kawasaki, R.; Wang, J.J.; Wong, T.Y.; Mitchell, P.; Daimon, M.; Oizumi, T.; Kato, T.; Kawata, S.; Kayama, T.; et al. Retinal Arteriolar Narrowing Predicts 5-Year Risk of Hypertension in Japanese People: The Funagata Study. Microcirculation 2010, 17, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.T.; Wong, T.Y. Retinal vascular manifestations of metabolic disorders. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2006, 17, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, T.Y.; Mitchell, P. Hypertensive Retinopathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 2310–2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, T.; Mitchell, P. The eye in hypertension. Lancet 2007, 369, 425–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, T.Y.; Kamineni, A.; Klein, R.; Sharrett, A.R.; Klein, B.E.; Siscovick, D.S.; Cushman, M.; Duncan, B.B. Quantitative Retinal Venular Caliber and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Older Persons. Arch. Intern. Med. 2006, 166, 2388–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, J.J.; Liew, G.; Klein, R.; Rochtchina, E.; Knudtson, M.D.; Klein, B.E.; Wong, T.Y.; Burlutsky, G.; Mitchell, P. Retinal vessel diameter and cardiovascular mortality: Pooled data analysis from two older populations. Eur. Hear. J. 2007, 28, 1984–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boerma, E.C.; van der Voort, P.H.J.; Spronk, P.E.; Ince, C. Relationship between sublingual and intestinal microcirculatory perfusion in patients with abdominal sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 2007, 35, 1055–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zadeh, J.K.; Ruemmler, R.; Hartmann, E.K.; Ziebart, A.; Ludwig, M.; Patzak, A.; Xia, N.; Li, H.; Pfeiffer, N.; Gericke, A. Responses of retinal arterioles and ciliary arteries in pigs with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Exp. Eye Res. 2019, 184, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.R.; Kim, Y.; Park, T.; Oh, W.Y.; Yune, H.; Lee, J.H.; Jo, Y.H.; Kim, K. 1423: Microcirculatory alterations in hemorrhagic shock and sepsis with optical coherence tomography. Crit. Care Med. 2016, 44, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simkiene, J.; Pranskuniene, Z.; Patasius, M.; Trumpaitis, J.; Boerma, E.C.; Pranskunas, A. Alterations of retinal vessels in patients with sepsis. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 2019, 34, 937–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erikson, K.; Liisanantti, J.H.; Hautala, N.; Koskenkari, J.; Kamakura, R.; Herzig, K.H.; Syrjälä, H.; Ala-Kokko, T.I. Retinal arterial blood flow and retinal changes in patients with sepsis: Preliminary study using fluorescein angiography. Crit. Care 2017, 21, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saloň, A.; Steuber, B.; Neshev, R.; Schmid-Zalaudek, K.; De Boever, P.; Bergmann, E.; Picha, R.; Fredriksen, P.M.; Nkeh-Chungag, B.N.; Goswami, N. Vascular Responses following Light Therapy: A Pilot Study with Healthy Volunteers. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saloň, A.; Neshev, R.; Teraž, K.; Šimunič, B.; Peskar, M.; Marušič, U.; Pišot, S.; Šlosar, L.; Gasparini, M.; Pišot, R.; et al. A pilot study: Exploring the influence of COVID-19 on cardiovascular physiology and retinal microcirculation. Microvasc. Res. 2023, 150, 104588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shankhwar, V.; Urvec, J.; Steuber, B.; Zalaudek, K.S.; Bergauer, A.; Alsuwaidi, H.; Du Plessis, S.; Alsheikh-Ali, A.; Kellett, C.; Bayoumi, R.; et al. Association of gender with cardiovascular and autonomic responses to central hypovolemia. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2023, 10, 1211774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.; De Boever, P.; Gerrits, N.; Akhtar, N.; Saqqur, M.; Ponirakis, G.; Gad, H.; Petropoulos, I.N.; Shuaib, A.; Faber, J.E.; et al. Retinal vessel multifractals predict pial collateral status in patients with acute ischemic stroke. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0267837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Åneman, A.; Pettersson, A.; Eisenhofer, G.; Friberg, P.; Holm, M.; Von Bothmer, C.; Fändriks, L. Sympathetic and renin-angiotensin activation during graded hypovolemia in pigs: Impact on mesenteric perfusion and duodenal mucosal function. Shock 1997, 8, 378–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Toung, T.; Reilly, P.M.; Fuh, K.C.; Ferris, R.; Bulkley, G.B. Mesenteric vasoconstriction in response to hemorrhagic shock. Shock 2000, 13, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bill, A.; Sperber, G.O. Control of retinal and choroidal blood flow. Eye 1990, 4, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, X.; Shen, Y.-M.; Jiang, M.-N.; Lou, X.-F.; Shen, Y. Ocular Blood Flow Autoregulation Mechanisms and Methods. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 2015, 8648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koep, J.L.; Taylor, C.E.; Coombes, J.S.; Bond, B.; Ainslie, P.N.; Bailey, T.G. Autonomic control of cerebral blood flow: Fundamental comparisons between peripheral and cerebrovascular circulations in humans. J. Physiol. 2022, 600, 15–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huxley, V.H.; Velten, M.; Heyob, K.M.; Wold, L.E.; Rogers, L.K.; Chavez, G.C.S.C.; Li, B.-Y.; Glazebrook, P.A.; Kunze, D.L.; Schild, J.H.; et al. Sex and the cardiovascular system: The intriguing tale of how women and men regulate cardiovascular function differently. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2007, 31, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ikram, M.K.; de Jong, F.J.; Vingerling, J.R.; Witteman, J.C.; Hofman, A.; Breteler, M.M.; de Jong, P.T. Are Retinal Arteriolar or Venular Diameters Associated with Markers for Cardiovascular Disorders? The Rotterdam Study. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004, 45, 2129–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Willikens, S.; Zitron, E.; Scholz, E.; Scherer, D.; Seyler, C.; Waegelein, M.; Kalinowski, T.; Katus, H.; Karle, C.; Duong, G. Retinal Arterio-Venule-Ratio (AVR) in the cardiovascular risk management of hypertension. Eur. Hear. J. 2013, 34, P5002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, T.Y.; Klein, R.; Klein, B.E.K.; Meuer, S.M.; Hubbard, L.D. Retinal Vessel Diameters and Their Associations with Age and Blood Pressure. Investig. Opthalmology Vis. Sci. 2003, 44, 4644–4650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goswami, N.; Roessler, A.; Lackner, H.K.; Schneditz, D.; Grasser, E.; Hinghofer-Szalkay, H.G. Heart rate and stroke volume response patterns to augmented orthostatic stress. Clin. Auton. Res. 2009, 19, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
| Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).