Next Article in Journal
Impact of Iron Oxide on Anaerobic Digestion of Frass in Biogas and Methanogenic Archaeal Communities’ Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Early Peri-Implant Bone Healing on Laser-Modified Surfaces with and without Hydroxyapatite Coating: An In Vivo Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of Soil Microbiota Enzymes in Soil Health and Activity Changes Depending on Climate Change and the Type of Soil Ecosystem
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 13
Issue 7
10.3390/biology13070534
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Soil Microbial Community Structure and Carbon Stocks Following Fertilization with Organic Fertilizers and Biological Inputs

by
Diana Sivojienė
*,
Aistė Masevičienė
,
Lina Žičkienė
,
Almantas Ražukas
and
Audrius Kačergius
Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Kėdainiai District, LT-58344 Akademija, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2024, 13(7), 534; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13070534
Submission received: 14 June 2024 / Revised: 7 July 2024 / Accepted: 15 July 2024 / Published: 17 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Soil Health: Influences of Organic Carbon and Microbiota)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Soil and its quality are becoming more and more important. Healthy and fertile soil allows for the cultivation of high-quality food plants, is resistant to erosion, and contributes to the mitigation of climate change. Researchers are intensively working on research that would allow not only to maintain the quality of the soil, but also to achieve the highest possible yield. Recently, a number of studies have been conducted to determine the benefits of organic fertilizers on soil properties and yield. Our research is about how organic fertilizers and biological inputs affect one of the most important soil components, soil bacteria and fungi, and how other agrochemical parameters change after the application of organic fertilizers. We present a lot of information on how the values of the studied agrochemical and microbiological indicators changed, depending on the use of different organic fertilizers. We also talk about the established effects of the studied biological inputs. Our results contribute to the body of knowledge and can be used to implement sustainable agriculture.

Abstract

The application of organic fertilizers and biological inputs to soil inevitably affects its quality, agrochemical indicators, and microbiota. Sustainable agriculture is based on continuously learning about how to properly manage available soil, water, and biological resources. The aim of the study was to determine changes in microorganism communities and carbon stocks in infertile soils for fertilization using different organic fertilizers and their combinations with bio-inputs. Genetic analysis of microorganism populations was performed using the NGS approach. Our study showed that the application of organic fertilizers affects the soil microbiota and the taxonomic structure of its communities. Specific groups of bacteria, such as Bacillota, were promoted by organic fertilization, meanwhile the abundance of Pseudomonadota and Ascomycota decreased in most treatments after the application of poultry manure. Metagenomic analysis confirmed that the use of bio-inputs increased the relative abundance of Trichoderma spp. fungi; meanwhile, a significant change was not found in the representatives of Azotobacter compared to the treatments where the bio-inputs were not used. The positive influence of fertilization appeared on all the studied agrochemical indicators. Higher concentrations of Corg and Nmin accumulated in the soil when we used granulated poultry manure, and pHKCl when we used cattle manure.

1. Introduction

Agriculture is a sector that has a significant impact on our environment and is one of the ways to ensure the production of essential food crops [1]. Ecological knowledge and good farming practices can be used as tools to maintain as much as possible natural ecosystems [2]. Good farming practices help protect soil fertility, water resources, and biodiversity, and help increase the amount of produce grown, while reducing widespread land degradation [3]. The growing problem of soil degradation is prompting a new review of the application of organic fertilizers in agriculture. Manure and other organic fertilizers are well known additives for maintaining and improving soil quality [4,5]. The positive impact of organic granulated fertilizers on soil is primarily shown by the increase in the amount of nutrients and organic matter, which is particularly important in intensive agriculture [6]. It also, at the same time, improves the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil [7,8,9,10]. With organic fertilizers, in addition to organic matter and basic macronutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium), the soil is supplemented with calcium and magnesium micronutrients [11,12,13]. This complex addition of food elements comprehensively optimizes plant nutrition and provides nutrients for microbial growth [14,15,16]. All this helps to support natural processes in the soil, which will have long-term effects on soil sustainability and fertility [17], directly affecting plant growth and increasing productivity [9,10,18,19].
The rational use of organic fertilizers is based not only on improving soil properties, but also on reducing the negative impact on the environment and negative climate changes [20,21]. Organic fertilizers are considered long-term sources of nutrients due to their slow decomposition of organic matter and the release of plant-available nutrients [17,22,23,24]. Thus, due to slow mineralization, mineral nutrients, especially mineral nitrogen, from organic fertilizers leach into groundwater more slowly than from mineral fertilizers, because of which water contamination due to nitrogen and other compounds is reduced [25]. New manure granulation technologies are being intensively developed to avoid the potential loss of nutrients in the soil of the previously used fallow manure [8]. This encourages the improvement of the processing of manure with a high moisture content into manure pellets with a high dry matter content, which are easier to transport and incorporate into soil [23,26].
Soil is a habitat to a variety of microorganisms, including bacteria, archaea, and fungi [27]. Bacteria and fungi are critical components of agricultural systems [28]. They play important roles in biogeochemical cycling and are distributed throughout soil [29,30]. Being decomposers, mutualistic or antagonistic symbionts, they influence the growth and health of other organisms [30,31]. Due to climate change and other anthropogenic factors, soil microorganisms are faced with the challenge of adapting to these changes [32].
Soil microorganisms are the main providers of soil functions and consequent services, such as carbon and other nutrient cycling methods. Currently, there is still a limited understanding of the impacts of the temporal and spatial dynamics of soil microorganisms on long-term biogeochemical soil processes, which depend not only on land cover, but also on climate [33]. Microbial metabolism has been shown to be the basis of soil organic matter (SOM), and its composition is the main driver of soil stability. Studies by various researchers have demonstrated the extraordinary importance of soil microorganisms in the creation of persistent long-term SOM fractions [34,35]. Based on the insights from as many as 197 peer-reviewed publications, the net benefits of agricultural management to improve soil carbon sequestration would not be sustainable if the role of soil microbial communities was ignored. The restoration of degraded soil microbial communities in agricultural soils is essential to maintain long-term high C potentials and to stabilize them over time [36].
The challenges posed by climate change are becoming more and more relevant and the importance of sustainable agriculture is increasing. Fertilization with organic fertilizers and the possibility to use suitable biological inputs are mentioned as an opportunity to contribute to sustainable farming. Organic fertilizers are considered long-term sources of nutrients, and mineral nitrogen from these fertilizers leaches into groundwater more slowly; therefore, it is a positive activity in relation to climate change. Since fertilization and the knowledge of the processes occurring in the soil after fertilization can help to ensure long-term positive effects on soil quality and fertility, the aim of this study was to investigate how the applications of organic fertilizers (litter, granulated poultry, and cattle manure) and biological inputs affect soil carbon stocks and the functional and taxonomic compositions of soil bacteria and fungi in an experimental agricultural field.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site and Soil Sampling

Soil samples from the experimental agricultural field, located in southeastern Lithuania (54.609344, 25.125962), were selected for metagenomic analysis and soil agrochemical analysis. According to the international soil classification system, the soil in the investigated area was sandy loam Haplic Luvisol [37]. A total of 22 samples for metagenomic analysis was collected in the summer period (July) of the years 2020 (11 samples) and 2022 (11 samples). Soil samples were taken in four replicates of the relevant test from an arable layer depth of 10–20 cm. A pooled sample of the relevant test was formed from four replicates. For the determination of pHKCl and organic carbon (Corg), the soil samples were taken from a soil depth of 0–20 cm and for the determination of mineral nitrogen (Nmin) from a soil depth of 0–60 cm.
All the mentioned samples were taken from the experimental field, which was fertilized with various organic fertilizers and their combinations with biological inputs or mineral fertilizers. The descriptions of fertilizers that were used in the experimental agricultural field are presented in Table 1. The bio-inputs used in the treatment were as follows: No. 1—Azotobacter spp.—a mixture of two cultures: A. chroococcum and A. vinelandii, together with the residues of the culture medium; No. 2—Trichoderma spp.—a mixture of three cultures: Trichoderma harzianum, T. tomentosum, and T. viride. They were selected based on their operational specificity and wide range of applications [38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. Fungal and bacterial strains were previously isolated from soil and prepared specifically for this research.
Corg and pHKCl were tested in the fall periods of 2020 and 2022, after harvesting the crops (spring barley and spring wheat, respectively); meanwhile, Nmin was tested in the spring. Various litter and granular organic fertilizers were applied during the experiment and their combinations with biological inputs and mineral fertilizers were applied to the soil 2 times—at the beginning of this research (2018) and after two years (2020).

2.2. Climate Conditions

According to the data of the Lithuanian Hydrometeorological Service [45], the average air temperature in Lithuania in 2020 was 9.2 °C, and in 2022—7.9 °C (1.8 °C and 0.5 °C more than the multi-annual rate—MAR (1990–2020 MAR air temperature was 7.4 °C)) [46]. The average amount of precipitation in 2020 was 646 mm (49 mm below the MAR (695 mm)), and in 2022—674 mm, close to the MAR. Graphic images are shown in Figure 1.
In July 2020, the average air temperature in Lithuania was 17.2 °C (1.1 °C below the MAR). Other summer months of this year were warmer and exceeded the MAR. July in the year 2022 was slightly warmer than in 2020 and was 17.7 °C (0.6 °C below the MAR). As in 2020, other summer months of the year 2022 were warmer and exceeded the MAR. In 2020, 63 mm (0.8 of the MAR) of precipitation fell on average in Lithuania; meanwhile, in 2022, the level was much higher—106.7 mm (1.27 of the MAR). Considering the entire summer period, 2022 was wetter than 2020.

2.3. Soil Agrochemical Analysis

The determination of soil pH was performed using a 1:5 (v/v) soil suspension in 1 M KCl. The mixture was shaken for 60 min and left to sit for 1 h. The pH of the suspension was measured at 20 ± 2 °C by stirring with a pH meter [47]. Organic carbon (Corg) was determined according to ISO 10694:1995 [48]; dry combustion was determined with total carbon analyzer Liqui TOC II. Mineral nitrogen (Nmin) was extracted in a 1:5 (w/v) soil suspension of the 1 M KCl solution. The suspension was shaken for 60 min at 20 ± 2 °C. After shaking, the suspension was filtered and analyzed using a flow injection analysis (FIA) system by an FIASTAR5000 analyzer. Nmin was calculated by adding the sum of nitrate and nitrite nitrogen to ammonia nitrogen [49].

2.4. Soil DNA Extraction and Microbiomic Analysis

DNA was extracted from homogenized soil samples using a ZymoBIOMICS®-96 MagBead DNA Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA samples were prepared for targeted sequencing with a Quick-16S™ Primer Set V3-V4 (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) and ZymoBIOMICS® Services ITS2 Primer Set (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). The sequencing library was prepared using a library preparation process, where PCR reactions were performed in real-time PCR machines to control cycles and therefore limit PCR chimera formation. The final PCR products were quantified with qPCR fluorescence readings and pooled together based on equal molarity. The final pooled library was cleaned up with the Select-a-Size DNA Clean & Concentrator™ (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA), then quantified with TapeStation® (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and Qubit® (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, WA, USA). The final library was sequenced on Illumina® MiSeq™ with a v3 reagent kit (600 cycles).

2.5. Bioinformatics Analysis

Unique amplicon sequences were inferred from raw reads using the Dada2 pipeline [50]. Chimeric sequences were also removed with the Dada2 pipeline. Taxonomy assignment was performed using Uclust from Qiime v.1.9.1. Taxonomy was assigned with the Zymo Research Database, a 16S database that is internally designed and curated, as reference. Composition visualization, alpha diversity, and beta diversity analyses were performed with Qiime v.1.9.1 [51]. If applicable, taxonomy that had significant abundance among different groups was identified by LEfSe [52] using default settings. Other analyses, such as heatmaps, Taxa2SV_deomposer, and PCoA plots, were performed with internal scripts.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The research results were evaluated by the method of analysis of variance (ANOVA), applying Duncan’s Multiple Range Test-R Studio. When assessing the statistical reliability of the data, the absence of the same letters between the compared treatments of the experiment indicates that the differences between the mentioned treatments are essential, and, on the contrary, in the case of identical correspondences of the letters, they are insignificant.
Alpha diversity metrics were used to express soil microbial community structure. The Shannon diversity index measures both the number of species and the disparity between species abundance. Alpha diversity analysis was performed with Qiime v.1.9.1 [51].

3. Results

3.1. Soil Agrochemical Analysis

The main nutrients from various types of organic fertilizers are released into compounds absorbed by plants with different intensities, so it is important to study and evaluate the changes in the agrochemical properties of soil (mineral nitrogen, organic carbon, and soil pHKCl) in the case of different fertilizing methods with organic fertilizers and their combinations with biological preparations. The conducted studies showed that fertilizing with various organic fertilizers of poultry or cattle manure and their combinations with biological inputs influenced all studied agrochemical properties of soil–organic carbon (Corg) and mineral nitrogen (Nmin)—and soil pHKCl—partly.
Changes in organic carbon (Corg) in the soil were determined by both different organic fertilizers and their combinations with biological preparations (Figure 2). In the control unfertilized fields (Cs), Corg tended to decrease by 0.09% per unit during the four-year study period, and, at the end of the experiment (2022), was 1.19%. Meanwhile, when fertilizing with different forms of poultry manure and their combinations with biological inputs, Corg in the soil varied from 1.34 to 1.69%, and when fertilizing with various cattle manure and its combinations—1.29–1.62%. This indicator was most effectively increased in the soil by both granulated organic poultry and cattle manure fertilizers (GPM170 + T and GCM170 + T) in combination with a biological input (T) containing Trichoderma spp. fungi. The changes compared to the unfertilized field (C) were 0.50 and 0.43% units, and compared to GPM170 and GCM170—0.18 and 0.20% units more, respectively. Also, slightly higher concentrations of Corg accumulated in the soil when plants were fertilized with the mentioned organic fertilizers, GPM170 and GCM170, both without and in combination with the biological input (A), which includes nitrogen-fixing bacteria Azotobacter spp. Mineral fertilizers applied to the soil in combination with both granulated poultry (GPM85) and cattle (GCM85) half-rate manure also tended to increase the accumulation of Corg in the soil, but not as markedly.
The experimental sites belong to the soil zone of Southeast Lithuania, which is rich in poor Corg soils. Evaluating the changes in Corg during the research period shows the positive effect of fertilization with organic fertilizers on the accumulation of this indicator in the soil. Soil analysis performed prior to experiment installation showed that most of the sandy loam Haplic Luvisol had medium (1.21–1.31%) Corg concentrations, with a 0–20 cm soil layer, and only isolated plots had low concentrations (1.17–1.20%). At the end of the experiment, a low concentration of Corg in the soil was found only in the control unfertilized fields, while in the fertilized fields it was medium and the range of values in the soil increased and varied from 1.29 to 1.69%. Corg accumulated in the arable layer (0–20 cm) after the first application of organic fertilizers in autumn 2018 and tended to increase every year until the end of the experiment. The change during the research period in the fields fertilized with various organic fertilizers varied on average from 0.08 to 0.38% units. During the research period, the biggest changes (0.38 and 0.33% units, respectively) were recorded in the fields, when plants were fertilized with granulated poultry or cattle manure in combination with a biological input (T) containing Trichoderma spp. Biological input (A) with nitrogen-fixing bacteria Azotobacter spp. also promoted the accumulation of Corg in the soil, but not as intensively as with Trichoderma spp. Poultry litter (PLM170) and cattle litter (CLM170) manure fertilizers, as well as mineral fertilizers (MF) incorporated into the soil in combination with both granulated poultry (GPM85) and cattle (GCM85) half-rate manure, had the least influence on Corg changes in the soil during the study period (0.08–0.21% units).
Mineral nitrogen (Nmin), especially its nitrate form, which makes up the majority, is extremely mobile in soil, so the concentrations of this element in spring can be influenced by various factors, such as fertilization; soil type and its granulometric composition (texture); cultivated plants; and meteorological conditions, especially rainfall, frost depth during the winter, etc. As we can see in Figure 3, in all years of the experiment, Nmin concentrations, according to their evaluation scale in the 0–60 cm soil layer, fluctuate between very low and low values. The average concentration of Nmin before the installation of the experiment in the autumn of 2018 before the application of various organic fertilizers was low and reached 4.63 mg kg−1, and the limits of variation in the values varied from very small to small—4.37–4.94 mg kg−1. Almost 2 years after both the first and second applications of organic fertilizers to the soil, Nmin concentrations in 2020 in spring were very low, and in 2022—very low and low. It is likely that part of the released nitrogen was used for the formation of plant crops, the other part could leach into the deeper layers of the soil due to the predominant light granulometric composition (texture) of the soil, and the rest simply remained in the soil in the form of organic matter. However, in the spring of 2022, the concentrations of this mobile element in the soil were on average 2-times higher than in 2020, and this was influenced by the meteorological conditions that prevailed in the late autumn and winter periods (November–March). In 2022, the amount of precipitation during the mentioned period was 31 mm higher than in 2020, but in recent years, no negative air temperatures were recorded, which allowed Nmin to easily migrate from the upper layers of the soil with a lighter granulometric composition (texture) to deeper ones, and then to groundwater. In 2022, the situation was the opposite, because the negative temperatures that prevailed in December 2021 and January 2022 allowed the formation of frost in the soil, which slowed down the processes of Nmin leaching from the soil, which is why the reserves were slightly higher in the spring. The processes of intensive washing in the soil were also accelerated by its light granulometric composition, especially the sand on the gravel in the subsoil.
Fertilization with various organic fertilizers in combination with bio-inputs or mineral fertilizers also influenced the changes in Nmin in the soil (Figure 3). The efficiency of fertilizers was slightly more pronounced in 2022, not only because of the higher concentration of this mobile element in the soil, but also, in comparison with the unfertilized soil, the increase in the fertilized experimental fields was higher than in the ones studied in 2020. Due to the influence of various poultry manure fertilizers and their combinations with biological preparations and mineral fertilizers, in 2022, the increase in Nmin in fertilized fields was determined to be 1.13 mg kg−1 higher on average compared to the unfertilized control field, and in 2020—0.71 mg kg−1 higher. When fertilizing with various forms of cattle manure, the increase compared to the control (C) was slightly lower: in 2020—0.59 mg kg−1, and in 2022—1.04 mg kg−1. Evaluating the effectiveness of different organic fertilizers, in the 0–60 cm layer of soil, more of this plant food material was found when fertilizing plants with both litter and granulated poultry manure fertilizers and in combination with bio-inputs than in fields fertilized with cattle manure. The highest Nmin concentrations were determined in 2020 after GPM170 + A and GPM170 were added to the soil, and in 2022 when GPM170 + A and GPM170 + T were fertilized. When fertilizing plants with granulated cattle manure, it was also the most effective in 2020 in combination with the biological preparation of Azotobacter spp. (GCM170 + A), and in 2022 by fertilizing GCM170 + A and GCM170 + T.
Evaluating the effectiveness of biological preparations on the concentration of Nmin in the soil, almost 2 years later, both after the first and after the second applications of organic fertilizers to the soil, only the biological preparation with nitrogen-fixing bacteria Azotobacter spp. (A) trended to increase the concentration of Nmin in the soil (Figure 3). It worked effectively when used in combination with both GPM170 and GCM170, as significant differences were found not only when compared to the control box (C), but also with GPM170 or GCM170. The effect of the bio-input containing Trichoderma spp. (T) was less regular and pronounced, and in 2020, when it was used in combination with both GPM170 and GCM170 Nmin, it was further reduced in the soil than when fertilizing only with granulated poultry or cattle manure at a 170 kg ha−1 norm. The effectiveness of the introduction of the bio-input with Trichoderma spp. into the soil became evident only at the end of the experiment (in 2022).
When evaluating the effectiveness of various organic fertilizers and their combinations with bio-inputs on soil pHKCl, it can be seen that the differences between the field options are not very pronounced, but when evaluating the changes in this indicator over time, at the end of the experiment (in 2022), positive trends of increasing pHKCl emerged, except for the fields where plants were fertilized with half rates of granulated poultry (GPM85) and/or granulated cattle manure (GCM85) in combination with mineral fertilizers (MF) (Figure 4). At the beginning of the experiment, before the application of fertilizers to the soil, the pHKCl of the soil in all fields was moderately acidic and ranged from 5.6 to 5.8, and at the end of the experiment it also remained moderately acidic, but the limits of variation in the values slightly increased and were in the range of 5.6–6.0. Both litter and granulated cattle manure organic fertilizers had a higher effect on pHKCl changes in the soil when they were evaluated during the experiment, and compared to fields fertilized with various poultry manures, this indicator increased by 0.3 over the corresponding 4-year period. The influence of bio-inputs both with Trichoderma spp. and with Azotobacter spp. on the changes in the mentioned indicator in the soil did not occur. It is also important to pay attention to the fact that soil pHKCl is also determined by soil typology, its granulometric composition (texture), and the depth of carbonate subsidence, which usually subsides at a depth of 0.8–1.2 m in the soils of the Eastern zone of the country.

3.2. Soil Microbiomic Analysis

Illumina® MiSeq™ analysis of soil samples from the experimental agricultural field (22 samples) revealed 658,451 high-quality sequences (259,900 bacterial sequences in 2020, and much more bacterial sequences in 2022—393,355). All sequences were separated into 2588 OTUs. 2581 (99.7%) OTUs were classified as Bacteria. In 2020, the number of bacterial OTUs was 1341, and in 2022 much more—2358 OTUs. Average bacterial OTU richness per sample in 2020 was 438, in 2022—730. Bacterial OTU was assigned to the phylum level. A total of 22 phyla were detected in the bacterial community (in 2020—20 phyla, in 2022—21 phyla). A total of 10 phyla in 2020 and 9 phyla in 2022 can be considered dominant, with a relative abundance of more than 1%. The relative abundances of the most common bacterial OTUs at the phylum level in 2020 and 2022 are presented in Figure 5.
The most abundant bacterial phyla were Actinomycetota (39% of bacterial sequences in 2020, and 33% in 2022), Pseudomonadota (27%, 28%), Acidobacteriota (9%, 10%), Bacillota (7%, 12%), and Chloroflexota (7%, 7%). Actinomycetota dominated at the class level (57.5% of all Actinomycetota in 2020 and 54.4% in 2022).
Evaluating the abundance of bacteria in different fertilization options, it was found that previously mentioned dominant phyla dominated in all fertilization treatments, but representatives of non-dominant phyla were only present in some fertilization treatments and were not detected in the control field (Figure 6). Hydrogenedentota was found only in the GCM170 + T fertilized field; Elusimicrobiota only in PLM170, GPM170 + A, GPM170 + T, GCM170, GPM85 + MF, and GCM85 + MF; and Chlamydiota was found in PLM170, GPM170, GPM170 + A, GPM170 + T, CLM170, GCM170 + T, GPM85 + MF, and GCM85 + MF.
After applying poultry manure fertilizer to the soil, a decrease in Actinomycetota occurred in GPM170 + T and GPM85 + MF. After applying cattle manure fertilizers, decreases occurred in GCM170 + A (in 2020), GCM170 + T (in 2020), and GCM85 + MF (in 2022). Meanwhile, the abundance of Pseudomonadota decreased with most treatments after the application of poultry manure. Only GPM170 + A (in 2022) and GPM85 + MF (in 2020) remained like the control. In CLM170 (in 2022), GCM170, GCM170 + A (in 2020), and GCM170 + T (in 2020), an increase in Pseudomonadota was observed. In 2020, Bacillota increased in all treatments after fertilizer application (except for one—GCM170 + A). In 2022, Bacillota also increased following most treatments, except PLM170, GPM170, and GCM170. In the fertilized fields, GPM170 + A and GCM170 + A, where the bio-input Azotobacter was additionally applied, metagenomic analysis did not detect representatives of Azotobacter during the taxonomic assignment, although it was expected.
The lowest diversity of bacterial species was found in soil samples CLM170 and GCM170 (Figure 7). The highest diversity of bacterial species was in GPM170 and GPM170 + T. The Shannon index of species diversity also varied between treatments and was highest in GPM170 + T and lowest in GPM85 + MF (in 2020).
On average, 97,854 high-quality fungal sequences were obtained from each experimental agricultural field sample. All fungal sequences were separated into 613 OTUs classified as Fungi. Average fungal OTU richness per sample in 2020 was 135, in 2022—168. Fungal OTUs were assigned to the phylum level (Figure 8).
The most abundant fungal phyla were Ascomycota (81.06% of fungal sequences in 2020 and 82.22% in 2022), Mucoromycota (10.36%, 5.30%), and Basidiomycota (6.30%, 4.15%). In Ascomycota, at the class level, Sordariomycetes dominates (53.93% of all Ascomycota in 2020 and 60.56% in 2022). It was also observed that Mucoromycota in 2020 was almost twice as abundant as in 2022. In 2022, the relative abundance of other fungi was significantly higher than in 2020.
The results of the different fertilization options show that all found phyla are present in all fertilization treatments, except Rozellomycota. Rozellomycota representatives were found only in 2022 in GPM170 + T, CLM170, GCM170 + A, GCM170 + A, and GCM85 + MF fertilized fields (Figure 9).
Ascomycota decreased in most treatments after the application of poultry manure fertilizer; only in PLM170 (2020) and GPM85 + MF (2020) a slight increase in abundance was observed. In treatments after the application of cattle manure fertilizer, in GCM170 (2020), GCM170 + A (2020), and GCM170 + T (2020), an increase in abundance of Ascomycota was observed. A decrease in relative abundance was also observed for all other treatments with cattle manure fertilizers. In 2020, an increase in representatives of Basidiomycota was observed in GPM170 + A, GPM170 + T, and CLM170. Mucoromycota was more abundant in most treatments after the application of organic fertilizers. Among all fertilization options, GPM170 + T stood out; here, both in 2020 and 2022, the abundance of Mucoromycota representatives decreased compared to the control.
In the year 2020, at the genus level, 372 OTUs, classified as Trichoderma, were identified in the GPM170 treatment without Trichoderma, and 468 OTUs in the GPM170 + T treatment with the bio-input Trichoderma. In the year 2022, the GPM170 treatment has 281 OTUs, and GPM170 + T has 2273 OTUs. Analyzing the GCM170 fertilization option without the bio-input Trichoderma, it was found that, in 2020, 488 OTUs, classified as Trichoderma at the genus level, were detected here. In the GCM170 + T fertilization option with bio-input Trichoderma, 692 OTUs, classified as Trichoderma, were detected. However, in the year 2022, more Trichoderma representatives were detected in GCM170 (412 OTUs) than in GCM170 + T (323 OTUs).
The following figure shows the values of fungal alpha diversity parameters in the different fertilization options (Figure 10).
The lowest diversity of fungal species was found in GPM170 + A soil samples (Figure 10). The highest diversity of fungal species was in GCM170 + T (in 2020). The Shannon index of species diversity was also the highest in GCM170 + T (in 2020) and lowest in GPM85 + MF (in 2022).

4. Discussion

This research conducted at the sites of this experiment showed that the ability of the soil to accumulate organic carbon (Corg) is related to fertilization, both by litter and granulated fertilizers of poultry or cattle manure, and in combination with biological inputs containing Trichoderma spp. These trends are confirmed by studies conducted by other researchers. Fu et al. (2019) [53] showed that the application of Trichoderma spp. to soil increased the accumulation of organic matter and total N and P concentrations during maize cultivation. The input of Azotobacter spp. in soil also has a positive relationship and correlates with many soils physicochemical (e.g., organic matter, soil pH, soil moisture, etc.) and microbiological properties [54,55]. The use of Azotobacter spp. as a biofertilizer facilitates the release of certain nutrients, such as carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, and phosphorus, contained in soil organic matter [56]. Other researchers, after conducting experiments, also determined the positive influence of various granulated manures on soil fertility, which is directly related to the accumulation of organic matter, Corg, humus, and mobile phosphorus and potassium in the arable layer of soil [26,57,58]. Magagula et al., 2010 [26] state that the amount of organic matter in the soil increased by 45% due to the influence of poultry manure alone, and this fertilizer also had a positive effect on other agrochemical properties of the soil. Research conducted by Raksarikorn et al., 2024 [59], showed similar trends, using both granulated organic fertilizers and mixing them with natural hormones of organic origin for plant fertilization (Cassava). Higher amounts of humus and Corg in the soil in autumn after white cabbage harvest were also determined by [60], using granular poultry manure for plant fertilization.
The direction and intensity of Corg accumulation were also determined by the granulometric composition (texture) of soil and the soil formation and microbiological processes taking place in the upper humic horizon of soil. The experimental sites belonged to the soil zone of Southeast Lithuania, which is has a light granulometric composition (texture) and less Corg-rich soils. However, in our studies, as we can see, before the installation of the experiment, the sandy loam Haplic Luvisol, which has a subsoil of sand on gravel, mostly had medium concentrations of Corg and only a few plots had low concentrations. At the end of the research, a low concentration of Corg in the soil was found only in the control unfertilized fields, and in the fertilized fields it remained at a medium concentration, but due to the positive influence of organic fertilizers, the range of values in the soil increased. According to the scientific literature, the lighter granulometric composition (texture) of soils often leads to a slower accumulation of Corg in soils with lower organic matter accumulation due to poorer plant growth conditions and the infrequent rotation of perennial grasses. In addition, lighter soils heat up more easily; in these soils, due to the higher activity of aerobic microorganisms, organic matter is rapidly decomposed, and the loosened mobile mineral nutrients of plants are easily washed into the deeper layers of the soil [61]. According to other researchers, lower amounts of Corg are accumulated in cultivated crop rotation field soils due to more intensive mineralization processes and due to too little plant biomass formation than in the upper soil layer of meadows, and the accumulation process itself takes a significantly longer time [62,63].
In soil, mineral nitrogen (Nmin) is an indicator that characterizes the existing amount of mobile and easily assimilated nitrogen, which makes up only 1–5% of the total soil nitrogen [64]. The amount of mineral nitrogen in the soil varies significantly during the year, depending on the fertilization of plants with organic and mineral fertilizers, climatic conditions, soil genesis and granulometric composition (texture) and soil nitrogen content, and the type of cultivated plants [65]. Our research showed that the changes in Nmin concentrations were also influenced by several of the previously mentioned factors. Very low and low Nmin concentrations prevailed in the 0–60 cm soil layer of the experimental sites in spring. This was influenced by the prevailing meteorological conditions during the late autumn and winter periods (November–March) in the respective years. Thus, in the absence of frost, Nmin could easily migrate from the upper soil layers of a lighter granulometric composition (texture) to the deeper ones, and then to the groundwater. In Sweden, nitrogen leaching from light-texture soils is also increased by warm winters and abundant precipitation [66]. This is also confirmed by Žičkienė et al., 2016 [67]. More intensive Nmin leaching processes in the soil of our experiment were also accelerated by its light granulometric composition (texture), especially due to the prevailing sand on gravel in the subsoil. Rutkowska and Fotyma (2011) also confirm that the amount of Nmin in soil is highly dependent on the granulometric composition (texture) of the soil [68]. It is known that soils with a heavier granulometric composition (texture), containing more clay and dust particles, accumulate more Nmin stocks than those with a light granulometric composition (texture), from which nitrogen migration occurs most intensively [69,70]. According to various authors, fertilization using composted or simple manure does not allow the active leaching of nitrogen from soil, and especially from sands and loams [71,72,73].
Fertilization with various organic fertilizers also affected the changes in Nmin in soil. Slightly more of this mobile nutrient was found in soil when plants were fertilized with both litter and granulated poultry manure, especially in combination with a biological input containing nitrogen-fixing bacteria Azotobacter spp. Granulated cattle manure used for plant fertilization in combination with Azotobacter spp. was also effective. Other researchers have also confirmed that Azotobacter spp. increase the amount of nitrogen in the soil by using carbon for nitrogen fixation [74,75], and whose role is very important in maintaining soil fertility and organic and sustainable crop production [75,76]. In addition, Azotobacter spp. can convert nitrogen into ammonia, which is then absorbed by plants to ensure the optimal process of their nutrition [77]. Azotobacter spp. facilitate the release of certain nutrients, such as nitrogen, sulfur, and phosphorus, present in soil organic matter [56,78]. In our experiment, the use of Trichoderma spp. was less stable and the effectiveness of Nmin only appeared at the end of the trials. According to Halim et al., 2023 [79], Trichoderma spp. are biofertilizers that fix nitrogen, solubilize soil phosphates, and promote plant growth, as well as improve soil health and fertility. According to researchers from other countries, the biological input, Trichoderma spp., as an organic product, can promote the dissolution and accumulation of macro- and micronutrients that are important in plant nutrition from soil organic matter. In addition, Trichoderma spp. not only increase the availability and efficiency of nutrient content, but also have a positive effect on root biomass formation [53,80,81]. Based on the research conducted by other researchers, it was found that, when growing white cabbage with granular poultry manure fertilizers, the amount of total nitrogen in the soil remained higher, but the amount of Nmin was lower, which further reduced the possibility of excess nitrogen leaching from the soil [60]. Stepantsova et al., 2021, state that increasing the rates of granulated organic fertilizers contributed to the increase in easily hydrolyzable nitrogen and other major nutrients and trace elements in the soil [82]. According to Schlegel and co-authors, the abundant content of organic matter in organic fertilizers not only improved the chemical, physical, and microbiological properties of soil, but also increased its productivity [83]. Using poultry manure maintained a stable amount of nutrients in the soil, including nitrogen, and reduced the possibility of leaching of mineral fertilizers [84].
Soil reaction (pHKCl) is closely related to the specific area where soils are formed, so this indicator is greatly influenced by the geomorphological situation of that area, soil-forming processes occurring in the soil, its granulometric composition (texture), species composition of growing plants, moisture regime, soil biological activity, and fertilization [85,86,87]. In our experiment, the moderately acidic reaction of soils was caused not only by the prevailing Haplic Luvisol in the area, which is naturally more acidic due to the intensity of substances (including calcium and magnesium carbonates) leached from the soil with precipitation, but also by the depth of subsidence of the carbonate layer itself, which is found deeper in the area of the Eastern country (at a depth of 0.8–1.2 m) than in the Middle zone [88]. In the experiment, when evaluating the efficiency of fertilization for the mentioned indicator, trends emerged that the influence of organic fertilizers of both litter and granulated cattle manure on pHKCl changes in the soil was greater, when they were evaluated during the experiment, and compared to fields fertilized with various poultry manures during the corresponding 4-year period. The influence of biological inputs both with Trichoderma spp. and with Azotobacter spp. was determined, and the change in the mentioned indicator in the soil did not occur. Thus, soil pHKCl still depends more on soil typology and its granulometric composition (texture) and the depth of carbonate subsidence than on fertilization with various granulated organic fertilizers. Most researchers also state that the granulated organic fertilizers used for fertilizing plants did not significantly affect the pH changes in the soil, and it remained stable throughout the research period [26,59,60]. However, Buryak et al. (2023) state that organic granular fertilizers tended to increase not only the Corg concentration, but also soil pH [57]. According to other researchers, Trichoderma spp. can reduce soil pH and activate nutrient release in soil by releasing various organic acids [53,89]. According to Kizilkaya (2009), Azotobacter spp. in soil correlates with many soils’ physicochemical parameters (e.g., organic matter, soil pH, etc.) [54].
In the context of global warming, ecosystems, including soil, which are able to conserve C, are very important [90]. Soil microorganisms perform important functions in soil, and one of them is the decomposition of organic material [91,92]. During normal tillage, bacteria predominate in the soil, whereas fungi predominate no-tillage conditions. Also, the presence of bacteria and fungi in the soil depends on soil chemical composition, moisture, pH, and structure [93]. In carrying out these studies, we wanted to compare the microbiological parameters of the soil in the experimental agricultural field using different organic fertilizers.
Our research showed that bacteria belonging to two phyla—Actinomycetota and Pseudomonadota and the fungal phylum Ascomycota—dominated in all studied treatments. Ge et al. [94] and Liang et al. [95] also found in their research that the dominant taxonomic group of bacteria in soil fertilized with organic fertilizers was Pseudomonadota. After comparing the results with the control, it was observed that Actinomycetota was more abundant in most treatments after the application of organic fertilizers. Zhao and co-authors also report in their research that specific groups of bacteria, including Actinomycetota, are enriched by organic fertilization [96]. There were only a few treatments where a decrease in Actinomycetota after fertilizer application was observed. After the application of cattle manure, no clear trend was identified. Bacillota increased almost in all treatments after fertilizer application. Other researchers have observed in their studies that representatives of Pseudomonadota and Bacillota are abundant in soils fertilized with organic fertilizers [97,98]. According to Francioli and co-authors, microbial groups, such as Bacillota and Pseudomonadota, can degrade complex organic compounds, so soils fertilized with organic fertilizers promote an increase in their abundance [99]. In GPM170 + A and GCM170 + A treatments, where the bio-input Azotobacter was additionally applied, metagenomic analysis did not present exceptional results showing an increase in these representatives. These embedded bacteria appeared to have “dissolved” into the soil microbial background by mid-summer, when samples were taken for NGS analysis, so they were not detected during the taxonomic assignment. Overall, both organic and inorganic fertilizers should have a positive effect on the most typical soil bacterium, Azotobacter [16]. According to Cinnadurai et al. and Adediran et al., fertilization with inorganic and organic fertilizers increases the numbers of Azotobacter, but genetic diversity remains unaffected [100,101].
Ascomycota was the dominant phylum in all treatments, followed by Basidiomycota, which are consistent with data from the literature. After comparing the results with the control, it was observed that Ascomycota decreased in most treatments after the application of poultry and cattle manure fertilizers. Only in a few treatments after the application of cattle manure fertilizer, an increase in the abundance of Ascomycota was observed. Meanwhile, representatives of Basidiomycota increased in all fertilization options in 2022 compared to the control. According to Semenov et al., trends in fungal abundance and diversity can be highly variable with organic fertilizer application [102]. The application of organic fertilizers can increase fungal abundance and diversity, decrease them, or they may remain unchanged [102,103,104,105,106]. Ye et al. state that fertilizer-induced decreases in fungal diversity occurred most in soils with an initial pH > 6 [105]. Meanwhile, Semenov and co-authors and Xiang and co-authors state that the fungal abundance and fungal community structure are primarily determined by the total amount of organic carbon and not by soil pH [102,106,107,108]. After comparing the results with the control, it was observed that Mucoromycota was more abundant in most treatments after the application of organic fertilizers. According to Xiang et al. and Sun et al., the application of manure increased the relative abundance of certain favorable fungal taxa, which suppress crop pathogens [103,106]. The metagenomic analysis showed that, in the GPM170 + T treatment, where the bio-input Trichoderma was additionally applied, more individuals in the genus level, belonging to Trichoderma, were identified in 2020 and 2022, compared to the treatment where the bio-input Trichoderma was not used. Fungi of the genera Trichoderma are known not only as decomposers of organic matter, but also as biological control agents against plant pathogens and opportunistic avirulent plant symbionts [102].

5. Conclusions

Organic fertilizers and their combinations with biological inputs or mineral fertilizers effectively enriched sandy loam Haplic Luvisol with organic matter, thus increasing its productivity and sustainability. The positive influence of fertilization appeared on all the studied indicators, although Nmin concentrations also strongly depended on meteorological conditions in the autumn–winter period, and soil pHKCl on the granulometric composition of the soil and the depth of carbonate subsidence. Higher concentrations of Corg and Nmin in the soil were also influenced by bio-inputs used in combination with various organic fertilizers. Trichoderma spp. fungi promoted Corg more effectively (1.69% and 1.62%), while Azotobacter spp. bacteria promoted Nmin (4.63 mg kg−1 and 4.52 mg kg−1) accumulation in the soil. When evaluating both litter and granulated organic fertilizers of different types, it was found that higher concentrations of Corg and Nmin accumulated in the soil when plants were fertilized with granulated poultry manure, and pHKCl with cattle manure.
The results of this study also show that organic fertilizers and their combinations with biological inputs or mineral fertilizers cause changes related to the relative abundance and diversity of soil bacteria and fungi. Specific groups of bacteria linked to fundamental nutrient cycling, such as Bacillota, were promoted by organic fertilization. However, the abundance of Pseudomonadota and Ascomycota decreased in most treatments after the application of poultry manure. The results of the metagenomic analysis confirm that the use of biological inputs increases the relative abundance of Trichoderma spp. fungi. A treatment that used granulated poultry manure and the biological input Trichoderma spp. differed in the diversity of bacterial species. In this treatment, in 2022, the highest value (9.11 ± 0.017) in the Shannon index was determined. Meanwhile, the highest diversity of fungal species (7.42 ± 0.003) was observed in 2020 in the treatment that used granular cattle manure fertilizers and the biological input Trichoderma spp. The poorest (4.54 ± 0.007) in terms of species diversity was the fertilization option, which used granular poultry manure fertilizers with a combination of mineral fertilizers in 2022. The use of organic fertilizers is likely to increase in the future. Therefore, in the context of climate change, the long-term studies of soil agrochemical and microbiological indicators are gaining increasing importance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.S., A.M., L.Ž., A.R. and A.K.; methodology, A.M., L.Ž. and A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, D.S. and A.M.; writing—review and editing, D.S., A.M. and A.K.; visualization, D.S. and A.M.; supervision, D.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rehman, A.B. Importance of agriculture in life. Int. Rev. Agric. World 2022, 22, 59615. [Google Scholar]
  2. Robertson, G.P.; Gross, K.L.; Hamilton, S.K.; Landis, D.A.; Schmidt, T.M.; Snapp, S.S.; Swinton, S.M. Farming for Ecosystem Services: An Ecological Approach to Production Agriculture. BioScience 2014, 64, 404–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tahat, M.M.; Alananbeh, K.M.; Othman, Y.A.; Leskovar, D.I. Soil Health and Sustainable Agriculture. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bhattacharyya, P.; Pal, R.; Chakraborty, A.; Chakrabarti, K. Microbial Biomass and Activity in a Laterite Soil Amended with Municipal Solid Waste Compost. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2001, 187, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mangalassery, S.; Kalaivanan, D.; Philip, P.S. Effect of inorganic fertilisers and organic amendments on soil aggregation and biochemical characteristics in a weathered tropical soil. Soil Tillage Res. 2019, 187, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ojo, J.A.; Olowoake, A.A.; Obembe, A. Efficacy of organomineral fertilizer and un-amended compost on the growth and yield of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus Thumb) in Ilorin Southern Guinea Savanna zone of Nigeria. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. 2014, 3, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Savci, S. Investigation of Effect of Chemical Fertilizers on Environment. APCBEE Procedia 2012, 1, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Budiono, R.; Adinurani, P.G. Efficiency analysis of production factors utilization in upland rice farming. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Natural Resources and Life Sciences (NRLS-2016), Surabaya, Indonesia, 20–21 October 2016; KnE Life Sciences: Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2017; pp. 180–187. [Google Scholar]
  9. Abdulkareem, M.A.; Aday, S.H.; Muhsin, S.J. Effect of the manure levels, depth and application methods using subsoil laying machine on the soil salinity and soil pH. Thi-Qar Univ. J. Agric. Res. 2018, 7, 155–172. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhao, X.; Huang, J.; Lu, J.; Sun, Y. Study on the influence of soil microbial community on the long-term heavy metal pollution of different land use types and depth layers in mine. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 170, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ailincai, D.; Ailincai, C.; Zbant, M.; Mercus, A.; Topa, D. Influence of organo-mineral fertilization on wheat and maize crops and the evolution of soil fertility under long-term experiments in the Moldavian Plain. Cercet. Agron. Mold. XLI 2008, 3, 33–42. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lal, R. Intensive agriculture, and the soil carbon pool. J. Crop Improv. 2013, 27, 735–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Murphy, B.W. Impact of soil organic matter on soil properties—A review with emphasis on Australian soils. Soil Res. 2015, 53, 605–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Olaniyi, J.O.; Ogunbiyi, E.M.; Alagbe, D.D. Effects of organo-mineral fertilizers on growth, yield and mineral nutrients uptake in cucumber. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2009, 5, 437–442. [Google Scholar]
  15. Akyol, C.; Ince, O.; Ince, B. Crop-based composting of lignocellulosic digestates: Focus on bacterial and fungal diversity. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 288, 121549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dinca, L.C.; Grenni, P.; Onet, C.; Onet, A. Fertilization and Soil Microbial Community: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Singh, R. (Ed.) Organic Fertilizers Types: Production and Environmental Impact; Nova Science Publisher: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 1–261. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mo, Z.; Li, W.; Pan, S.; Fitzgerald, T.L.; Xiao, F.; Tang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Duan, M.; Tian, H.; Tang, X. Shading during the grain filling period increases 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline content in fragrant rice. Rice 2015, 8, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Li, S.; Jiang, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Pan, S.; Tian, H.; Duan, M.; Wang, S.; Tang, X.; Mo, Z. Responses of plant growth, physiological, gas exchange parameters of super and non-super rice to rhizosphere temperature at the tillering stage. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sikora, J.; Niemiec, M.; Szelag-Sikora, A.; Grodek-Szostak, Z.A.; Kubon, M.; Komorowska, M. The Impact of a Controlled-Release Fertilizer on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Efficiency of the Production of Chinese Cabbage. Energies 2020, 13, 2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jensen, L.S.; Oelofse, M.; Hoeve, M.; Bruun, S. Environmental Impact Assessment on the Production and Use of Biobased Fertilizers. Biorefinery Inorg. Recover. Miner. Nutr. Biomass Org. Waste 2020, 1, 329–362. [Google Scholar]
  22. Purbajanti, E.D.; Kusmiyati, F.; Slamet, W.; Adinurani, P.G. Chlorophyll, crop growth rate and forage yield of Brachiaria (Brachiaria brizantha Stapf) as the result of goat manure in various nitrogen dosage. AIP Conf. Proc. 2016, 1755, 130013. [Google Scholar]
  23. Pocius, A.; Jotautiene, E.; Pekarskas, J.; Palsauskas, M. Investigation of physical-mechanical properties of experimental organic granular fertilizers. In Proceedings of the Engineering for Rural Development: 15th International Scientific Conference Proceedings, Jelgava, Latvia, 25–27 May 2016; pp. 1115–1120. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jasinskas, A.; Pekarskas, J.; Kucinskas, V.; Aboltins, A. Investigation of natural magnesium mineral fertilizer granulation and determination of granule qualitative indicators. In Proceedings of the Engineering for Rural Development: 15th International Scientific Conference Proceedings, Jelgava, Latvia, 25–27 May 2016; pp. 647–652. [Google Scholar]
  25. Česonienė, L.; Rutkovienė, V. Lysimetric research of nutrient losses from organic fertilizers. Agron. Res. 2009, 7, 224–232. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mieldažys, R.; Jotautienė, E.; Jasinskas, A.; Pekarskas, J.; Zinkevičienė, R. Investigation of physical-mechanical properties and impact on soil of granulated manure compost fertilizers. J. Environ. Eng. Landsc. Manag. 2019, 27, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gannes, V.; Eudoxie, G.; Bekele, I.; Hickey, W.J. Relations of microbiome characteristics to edaphic properties of tropical soils from Trinidad. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Schlatter, D.C.; Kahl, K.; Carlson, B.; Huggins, D.R.; Paulitz, T. Fungal community composition and diversity vary with soil depth and landscape position in a no-till wheat-based cropping system. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2018, 94, fiy098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ko, D.; Yoo, G.; Yun, S.T.; Jun, S.C.; Chung, H. Bacterial and fungal community composition across the soil depth profiles in a fallow field. J. Ecol. Environ. 2017, 41, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Frey, B.; Walthert, L.; Perz-Mon, C.; Stierli, B.; Kochli, R.; Dharmarajan, A.; Brunner, I. Deep Soil Layers of Drought-Exposed Forests Harbor Poorly Known Bacterial and Fungal Communities. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 674160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Rousk, J.; Bengtson, P. Microbial regulation of global biogeochemical cycles. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. d’Entremont, T.W.; Kivlin, S.N. Specificity in plant-mycorrhizal fungal relationships: Prevalence, parameterization, and prospects. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1260286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Patoine, G.; Eisenhauer, N.; Cesarz, S.; Phillips, H.R.P.; Xu, X.; Zhang, L.; Guerra, C.A. Drivers and trends of global soil microbial carbon over two decades. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bastida, F.; Eldridge, D.J.; García, C.; Png, G.K.; Bardgett, R.D.; Delgado-Baquerizo, M. Soil microbial diversity–biomass relationships are driven by soil carbon content across global biomes. ISME J. 2021, 15, 2081–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Domeignoz-Horta, L.A.; Shinfuku, M.; Junier, P.; Poirier, S.; Verrecchia, E.; Sebag, D.; DeAngelis, K.M. Direct evidence for the role of microbial community composition in the formation of soil organic matter composition and persistence. ISME Commun. 2021, 1, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bhattacharyya, S.S.; Ros, G.H.; Furtak, K.; Iqbal, H.M.N.; Parra-Saldívar, R. Soil carbon sequestration—An interplay between soil microbial community and soil organic matter dynamics. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 815, 152928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, Update 2015 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps; World Soil Resources Reports No. 106; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  38. Harman, G.E.; Howell, C.R.; Viterbo, A.; Chet, I.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma species—Opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ahmad, F.; Ahmad, I.; Khan, M.S. Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth promoting activities. Microbiol. Res. 2008, 163, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Prasun, K.; Mukherjee, P.K.; Horwitz, B.A.; Herrera-Estrella, A.; Schmoll, M.; Kenerley, C.M. Trichoderma Research in the Genome Era. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2013, 51, 105–129. [Google Scholar]
  41. López-Bucioa, J.; Pelagio-Floresa, R.; Herrera-Estrella, A. Trichoderma as biostimulant: Exploiting the multilevel properties of a plant beneficial fungus. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 196, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chennappa, G.; Naik, M.K.; Amaresh, Y.S.; Nagaraja, H.; Sreenivasa, M.Y. Azotobacter: A Potential Biofertilizer and Bioinoculants for Sustainable Agriculture. In Microorganisms for Green Revolution, Microorganisms for Sustainability; Panpatte, D.G., Jhala, Y., Vyas, R., Shelat, H., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2017; Volume 6, pp. 87–106. [Google Scholar]
  43. Sagar, A.; Debbarma, V.; Abraham, T.; Shukla, P.K.; Ramteke, P.W. Functional Diversity of Soil Bacteria from Organic Agro Ecosystem. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2017, 6, 3500–3518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Egamberdieva, D.; Ahmad, P. (Eds.) Plant Microbiome: Stress Response. In Microorganisms for Sustainability; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2018; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
  45. Lithuanian Hydrometeorological Service Database. Available online: http://www.meteo.lt/en/ (accessed on 11 November 2023).
  46. LHS/ME. Comparative evaluation of climate changes in Lithuania 1961–1990 and 1991–2020 standard climate norms. 2021, 18. (In Lituanian). Available online: https://www.meteo.lt/app/uploads/2023/11/Lietuvos_klimato_pokyciu_vertinimas_lyginant_klimato_normas.pdf (accessed on 16 July 2024).
  47. ISO 10390:2021; Soil Quality—Determination of pH. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/75243.html (accessed on 16 July 2024).
  48. ISO 10694:1995; Soil Quality—Determination of Organic and Total Carbon after Dry Combustion (Elementary Analysis). ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1995. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/18782.html (accessed on 16 July 2024).
  49. ISO 14256-2:2005; Soil Quality—Determination of Nitrate, Nitrite and Ammonium in Field-Moist Soils by Extraction with Potassium Chloride Solution. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/32399.html (accessed on 16 July 2024).
  50. Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Rosen, M.J.; Han, A.W.; Johnson, A.J.; Holmes, S.P. DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Caporaso, J.G.; Kuczynski, J.; Stombaugh, J.; Bittinger, K.; Bushman, F.D.; Costello, E.K.; Fierer, N.; Peña, A.G.; Goodrich, J.K.; Gordon, J.I.; et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 335–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Segata, N.; Izard, J.; Waldron, L.; Gevers, D.; Miropolsky, L.; Garrett, W.S.; Huttenhower, C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, R60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Fu, J.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, Y.F.; Yang, K.J. Trichoderma affects the physiochemical characteristics and bacterial community composition of saline-alkaline maize rhizosphere soils in the cold region of Heilongjiang Province. Plant Soil 2019, 436, 211–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kizilkaya, R. Nitrogen fixation capacity of Azotobacter spp. Strains isolated from soils in different ecosystems and relationship between them and the microbiological properties of soils. J. Environ. Biol. 2009, 30, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Dar, S.A.; Bhat, R.A.; Dervash, M.A.; Dar, Z.A.; Dar, G.H. Azotobacter as biofertilizer for sustainable soil and plant health under saline environmental conditions. In Microbiota and Biofertilizers; Hakeem, K.R., Dar, G.H., Mehmood, M.A., Bhat, R.A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  56. Joshi, K.K.; Kumar, V.; Dubey, R.C.; Maheshwari, D.K.; Bajpai, V.K.; Kang, S.C. Effect of Chemical Fertilizer adaptive Variants, Pseudomonas aeruginosa GRC 2 and Azotobacter chroococcum AC 1, on Macrophominaphaseolina Causing Charcoal Rot of Brassica juncea. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 2006, 25, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Buryak, S.M.; Chernikova, O.V.; Mazhayskiy, Y.A. The influence of granulated and rotted turkey manure on the productivity of perennial grasses. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2023, 1212, 012015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Magagula, N.E.M.; Ossom, E.M.; Rhykerd, R.L.; Rhykerd, L. Effects of chicken manure on soil properties under sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) culture in Swaziland. Am. -Eurasian J. Agron. 2010, 3, 36–43. [Google Scholar]
  59. Raksarikorn, C.; Pumisak, I.; Ruankuan, I. Influence of organic granular fertilizer, chemical and granular organic fertilizer with hormone mixed formula (HO), and chemical fertilizer to the yield and starch content of Cassava. Rev. Gestão Soc. E Ambient. 2024, 18, e05410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kavaliauskaitė, D.; Karklelienė, R.; Jankauskienė, J. Impact of an organic fertiliser on the yield of white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) and the soil productivity. Hortic. Sci. 2023, 50, 290–296. [Google Scholar]
  61. Tripolskaja, L.; Romanovkaja, D.; Šlepetienė, A.; Verbylienė, I. Comparison of the efficiency of green manure and mineral fertilizers for winter rye and barley yields in a sandy loam soil. Žemės Ūkio Moksl. 2012, 19, 27–35. [Google Scholar]
  62. Martens, D.A.; Reedy, T.R.; Lewis, D.T. Soil organic carbon content and composition of 130-year crop, pasture, and forest land-use managements. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2004, 10, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, R.; Guo, S.; Li, N.; Li, R.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, J.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Q.; Wu, D.; Sun, Q.; et al. Phosphorus Accumulation and Sorption in Calcareous Soil under Long-Term Fertilization. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Bednarek, W.; Reszka, R. Influence of liming and mineral fertilization on the content of mineral nitrogen in soil. J. Elem. 2008, 13, 301–308. [Google Scholar]
  65. Liu, H.B.; Wu, W.L.; Zhang, J. Regional differentiation of non-point source pollution of agriculture-derived nitrate nitrogen in groundwater in northern China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2005, 107, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kyllmar, K.; Carlsson, C.; Gustafson, A.; Ulen, B.; Jahnsson, H. Nutrient discharge from small agricultural catchments in Sweden: Characteristics and trends. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 115, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Žičkienė, L. Mineral Nitrogen Fluxes in Different Soils. Ph.D. Thesis, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Dotnuva, Lithuania, 2016; 138p. [Google Scholar]
  68. Rutkowska, A.; Fotyma, M. Mineral nitrogen as a universal soil test to predict plant n requirements and ground watter pollution—Casestudy for Poland. In Principles, Application and Assessment in Soil Science; Burcu Özkaraova Güngör, E., Ed.; Intech Open: London, UK, 2011; pp. 333–350. [Google Scholar]
  69. Jabloun, M.; Schelde, K.; Tao, T.; Olesen, E.J. Effect of temperature and precipitation on nitrate leaching from organic cereal cropping systems in Denmark. Eur. J. Agron. 2015, 62, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kuśmierz, S.; Skowrońska, M.; Tkaczyk, P.; Lipiński, W.; Mielniczuk, J. soil organic carbon and mineral nitrogen contents in soils as affected by their pH, texture and fertilization. Agronomy 2023, 13, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Plošek, L.; Elbl, J.; Lošák, T.; Kužel, S.; Kintl, A.; Juřička, D.; Kynický, J.; Martensson, A.; Brtnický, M. Leaching of mineral nitrogen in the soil influenced by addition of compost and N-mineral fertilizer. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 2017, 67, 607–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yang, S.; Wang, Y.; Liu, R.; Zhang, A.; Yang, Z. Effect of Nitrate Leaching Caused by Swine Manure Application in Fields of the Yellow River Irrigation Zone of Ningxia, China. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Elbl, J.; Šimečkova, J.; Škarpa, P.; Kintl, A.; Brtnicky, M.; Vaverkova, M.D. Comparison of the Agricultural Use of Products from Organic Waste Processing with Conventional Mineral Fertilizer: Potential Effects on Mineral Nitrogen Leaching and Soil Quality. Agronomy 2020, 10, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kukreja, K.; Suneja, S.; Goyal, S.; Narula, N. Phytohormone production by Azotobacter–a review. Agric. Rev. 2004, 25, 70–75. [Google Scholar]
  75. Kyaw, E.P.; Soe, M.M.; Yu, S.S.; Latt, Z.K.; Lynn, T.M. Study on plant growth promoting activities of azotobacter isolates for sustainable agriculture in Myanmar. J. Biotechnol. Biores. 2019, 1, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  76. Hakeem, K.R.; Akhtar, M.S.; Abdullah, S.N.A. (Eds.) Plant, Soil and Microbes: Implications in Crop Science; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  77. Shokri, D.; Emtiazi, G. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production in symbiotic and non-symbiotic nitrogen fixing bacteria and its optimization by Taguchi design. Curr. Microbiol. 2010, 61, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gauri, S.S.; Mandal, S.M.; Pati, B.R. Impact of Azotobacter exopolysaccharides on sustainable agriculture. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 95, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Abdul-Halim, A.M.; Shivanand, P.; Krishnamoorthy, S.; Taha, H. A review on the biological properties of Trichoderma spp. as a prospective biocontrol agent and biofertilizer. J. Appl. Biol. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Srivastava, P.K.; Vaish, A.; Dwivedi, S.; Chakrabarty, D.; Singh, N.; Tripathi, R.D. Biological removal of arsenic pollution by soil fungi. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 2430–2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mastouri, F.; Bjorkman, T.; Harman, G.E. Seed treatment with Trichoderma harzianum alleviates biotic, abiotic, and physiological stresses in germinating seeds and seedlings. Phytopathology 2010, 100, 1213–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Stepantsova, L.V.; Matsnev, I.N.; Palchikov, E.V.; Volkov, S.A.; Moskaleva, E.V. Effect of granular fertilizer of disinfected chicken dung application on crop productivity and soil fertility. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 845, 012035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Schlegel, A.J.; Assefa, Y.; Bond, H.D.; Haag, L.A.; Stone, L.R. Changes in soil nutrients after 10 years of cattle manure and swine effluent application. Soil Tillage Res. 2017, 172, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Mažeika, R.; Arbačiauskas, J.; Masevičienė, A.; Narutytė, I.; Šumskis, D.; Žičkienė, L.; Rainys, K.; Drapanauskaite, D.; Staugaitis, G.; Baltrusaitis, J. Nutrient Dynamics and Plant Response in Soil to Organic Chicken Manure Based Fertilizers. Waste Biomass Valorization 2021, 12, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Slessarev, E.W.; Lin, Y.; Bingham, N.L.; Johnson, J.E.; Dai, Y.; Schimel, J.P.; Chadwick, O.A. Water balance creates a threshold in soil pH at the global scale. Nature 2016, 540, 567–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhang, Y.-Y.; Wu, W.; Liu, H. Factors affecting variations of soil pH in different horizons in hilly regions. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hong, S.; Gan, P.; Chen, A. Environmental controls on soil pH in planted forest and its response to nitrogen deposition. Environ. Res. 2019, 172, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Mažvila, J. (Ed.) Lietuvos Dirvožemių Makromorfologinė Diagnostika: Monografija; Lietuvos Žemdirbystės Institutas: Kėdainiai, Lithuania, 2006; 283p. [Google Scholar]
  89. Poveda, J. Trichoderma as biocontrol agent against pests: New uses for a mycoparasite. Biol. Control 2021, 159, 104634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Nunes, L.J.R.; Meireles, C.I.R.; Gomes, C.J.P.; Ribeiro, N.M.C.A. The Impact of Climate Change on Forest Development: A Sustainable Approach to Management Models Applied to Mediterranean-Type Climate Regions. Plants 2022, 11, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Klavina, D.; Tedersoo, L.; Agan, A.; Adamson, K.; Bitenieks, K.; Gaitnieks, T.; Drenkhan, R. Soil fungal communities in young Norway spruce-dominant stands: Footprints of former land use and selective thinning. Eur. J. For. Res. 2022, 141, 503–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Frac, M.; Hannula, S.E.; Bełka, M.; Jedryczka, M. Fungal biodiversity and their role in soil health. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Furtak, K.; Gajda, A.M. Activity and Variety of Soil Microorganisms Depending on the Diversity of the Soil Tillage System. In Sustainability of Agroecosystems; de Oliveira, A.B., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  94. Ge, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, L.; Yang, M.; He, J. Long-term fertilization regimes affect bacterial community structure and diversity of an agricultural soil in northern China. J. Soils Sediments 2008, 8, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Liang, R.; Hou, R.; Li, J.; Lyu, Y.; Hang, S.; Gong, H.; Ouyang, Z. Effects of Different Fertilizers on Rhizosphere Bacterial Communities of Winter Wheat in the North China Plain. Agronomy 2020, 10, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhao, J.; Ni, T.; Li, J.; Lu, Q.; Fang, Z.; Huang, Q.; Zhang, R.; Li, R.; Shen, B.; Shen, Q. Effects of organic–inorganic compound fertilizer with reduced chemical fertilizer application on crop yields, soil biological activity and bacterial community structure in a rice–wheat cropping system. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2016, 99, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Cui, X.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, J.; Peng, F.; Gao, P. Long-term combined application of manure and chemical fertilizer sustained higher nutrient status and rhizospheric bacterial diversity in reddish paddy soil of Central South China. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Rieke, E.L.; Soupir, M.L.; Moorman, T.B.; Yang, F.; Howe, A.C. Temporal Dynamics of Bacterial Communities in Soil and Leachate Water After Swine Manure Application. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 3197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Francioli, D.; Schulz, E.; Lentendu, G.; Wubet, T.; Buscot, F.; Reitz, T. Mineral vs. Organic Amendments: Microbial Community Structure, Activity and Abundance of Agriculturally Relevant Microbes Are Driven by Long-Term Fertilization Strategies. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Cinnadurai, C.; Gopalaswamy, G.; Balachandar, D. Diversity of cultivable Azotobacter in the semi-arid alfisol receiving long-term organic and inorganic nutrient amendments. Ann. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 1397–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Adediran, J.A.; De Baets, N.; Mnkeni, P.N.S.; Kiekens, L.; Muyima, N.Y.O.; Thys, A. Organic Waste Materials for Soil Fertility Improvement in the Border Region of the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 2003, 20, 283–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Semenov, M.V.; Krasnov, G.S.; Semenov, V.M.; Bruggen, A. Mineral and Organic Fertilizers Distinctly Affect Fungal Communities in the Crop Rhizosphere. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Sun, R.; Dsouza, M.; Gilbert, J.A.; Guo, X.; Wang, D.; Guo, Z.; Ni, Y.; Chu, H. Fungal community composition in soils subjected to long-term chemical fertilization is most influenced by the type of organic matter. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 5137–5150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Ding, J.; Jiang, X.; Guan, D.; Zhao, B.; Ma, M.; Zhou, B.; Cao, F.; Yang, X.; Li, L.; Li, J. Influence of inorganic fertilizer and organic manure application on fungal communities in a long-term field experiment of Chinese Mollisols. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 111, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ye, G.; Lin, Y.; Luo, J.; Di, H.J.; Lindsey, S.; Liu, D.; Fan, J.; Ding, W. Responses of soil fungal diversity and community composition to long-term fertilization: Field experiment in an acidic Ultisol and literature synthesis. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2020, 145, 103305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Xiang, X.; Liu, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, D.; Xu, C.; Kuzyakov, Y. Divergence in fungal abundance and community structure between soils under long-term mineral and organic fertilization. Soil Tillage Res. 2020, 196, 104491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Rousk, J.; Bååth, E.; Brookes, P.C.; Lauber, C.L.; Lozupone, C.; Caporaso, J.G.; Knight, R.; Fierer, N. Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME J. 2010, 4, 1340–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Liu, J.; Sui, Y.; Yu, Z.; Shi, Y.; Chu, H.; Jin, J.; Liu, X.; Wang, G. Soil carbon content drives the biogeographical distribution of fungal communities in the black soil zone of northeast China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015, 83, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biology 13 00534 g001
Figure 1. Average temperature (°C) (a) and average precipitation (mm) (b) in 2020 and 2022.
Figure 1. Average temperature (°C) (a) and average precipitation (mm) (b) in 2020 and 2022.
Biology 13 00534 g001
Biology 13 00534 g002
Figure 2. The influence of various organic fertilizers and their combinations with biological inputs on changes in organic carbon (Corg) in the 0–20 cm soil layer (autumn 2018, 2020, and 2022). Note. Significant differences were identified between experimental data marked a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h at the 5% probability level (p ≤ 0.05). When assessing the statistical significance of the data, the absence of the same letters (a–h) between the compared variants of the experiment indicates that the differences between the mentioned variants are significant, and on the contrary, in the case of identical letter correspondences, they are insignificant. X —the results were presented before the installation of the experiment (in 2018), so no statistical evaluation of the data was performed; only the background level of Corg in the soil was evaluated.
Figure 2. The influence of various organic fertilizers and their combinations with biological inputs on changes in organic carbon (Corg) in the 0–20 cm soil layer (autumn 2018, 2020, and 2022). Note. Significant differences were identified between experimental data marked a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h at the 5% probability level (p ≤ 0.05). When assessing the statistical significance of the data, the absence of the same letters (a–h) between the compared variants of the experiment indicates that the differences between the mentioned variants are significant, and on the contrary, in the case of identical letter correspondences, they are insignificant. X —the results were presented before the installation of the experiment (in 2018), so no statistical evaluation of the data was performed; only the background level of Corg in the soil was evaluated.
Biology 13 00534 g002
Biology 13 00534 g003
Figure 3. The influence of various organic fertilizers and their combinations with bio-inputs on the concentration of mineral nitrogen (Nmin) in the 0–60 cm soil layer (spring 2020 and 2022). Note. The average Nmin concentration before the installation of the experiment in the fall of 2018 (before the introduction of various organic fertilizers) was 4.63 mg kg−1; the range of values—4.37–4.94 mg kg−1. Significant differences were identified between experimental data marked a, b, c, d, e, f, g at the 5% probability level (p ≤ 0.05). When assessing the statistical significance of the data, the absence of the same letters (a–g) between the compared variants of the experiment indicates that the differences between the mentioned variants are significant, and on the contrary, in the case of identical letter correspondences, they are insignificant.
Figure 3. The influence of various organic fertilizers and their combinations with bio-inputs on the concentration of mineral nitrogen (Nmin) in the 0–60 cm soil layer (spring 2020 and 2022). Note. The average Nmin concentration before the installation of the experiment in the fall of 2018 (before the introduction of various organic fertilizers) was 4.63 mg kg−1; the range of values—4.37–4.94 mg kg−1. Significant differences were identified between experimental data marked a, b, c, d, e, f, g at the 5% probability level (p ≤ 0.05). When assessing the statistical significance of the data, the absence of the same letters (a–g) between the compared variants of the experiment indicates that the differences between the mentioned variants are significant, and on the contrary, in the case of identical letter correspondences, they are insignificant.
Biology 13 00534 g003
Biology 13 00534 g004
Figure 4. The influence of various organic fertilizers and their combinations with bio-inputs on pHKCl changes in the 0–20 cm soil layer (autumn 2018 and 2022). Note. Significant differences were identified between experimental data marked a, b, c, d, e at the 5% probability level (p ≤ 0.05). When assessing the statistical significance of the data, the absence of the same letters (a–e) between the compared variants of the experiment indicates that the differences between the mentioned variants are significant, and on the contrary, in the case of identical letter correspondences, they are insignificant. x—chemical analyses of the soil were carried out before the installation of the experiment, i.e., before the introduction of organic fertilizers into the soil; therefore, the statistical evaluation of the data in 2018 was not performed as only the background was assessed.
Figure 4. The influence of various organic fertilizers and their combinations with bio-inputs on pHKCl changes in the 0–20 cm soil layer (autumn 2018 and 2022). Note. Significant differences were identified between experimental data marked a, b, c, d, e at the 5% probability level (p ≤ 0.05). When assessing the statistical significance of the data, the absence of the same letters (a–e) between the compared variants of the experiment indicates that the differences between the mentioned variants are significant, and on the contrary, in the case of identical letter correspondences, they are insignificant. x—chemical analyses of the soil were carried out before the installation of the experiment, i.e., before the introduction of organic fertilizers into the soil; therefore, the statistical evaluation of the data in 2018 was not performed as only the background was assessed.
Biology 13 00534 g004
Biology 13 00534 g005
Figure 5. Relative abundances of the most common bacterial phyla in 2020 (a) and 2022 (b).
Figure 5. Relative abundances of the most common bacterial phyla in 2020 (a) and 2022 (b).
Biology 13 00534 g005
Biology 13 00534 g006
Figure 6. Relative abundances of the most common bacteria phyla in different fertilization options in 2020 and 2022.
Figure 6. Relative abundances of the most common bacteria phyla in different fertilization options in 2020 and 2022.
Biology 13 00534 g006
Biology 13 00534 g007
Figure 7. Bacterial alpha diversity parameters (observed species and Shannon index) for the different fertilization options.
Figure 7. Bacterial alpha diversity parameters (observed species and Shannon index) for the different fertilization options.
Biology 13 00534 g007
Biology 13 00534 g008
Figure 8. Relative abundances of the most common fungi phyla in 2020 (a) and 2022 (b).
Figure 8. Relative abundances of the most common fungi phyla in 2020 (a) and 2022 (b).
Biology 13 00534 g008
Biology 13 00534 g009
Figure 9. Relative abundances of the most common fungi phyla in different fertilization options in 2020 and 2022.
Figure 9. Relative abundances of the most common fungi phyla in different fertilization options in 2020 and 2022.
Biology 13 00534 g009
Biology 13 00534 g010
Figure 10. Fungal alpha diversity parameters (observed species and Shannon index) in the different fertilization options.
Figure 10. Fungal alpha diversity parameters (observed species and Shannon index) in the different fertilization options.
Biology 13 00534 g010
Table 1. Treatments used in the experimental agricultural field.
Table 1. Treatments used in the experimental agricultural field.
TreatmentDescription
Ccontrol (without any fertilizer—N0P0K0)
PLM170poultry litter manure (N170) 3
GPM170granulated poultry manure (N170) 3
GPM170 + Agranulated poultry manure (N170) + bio-input No. 1 3
GPM170 + Tgranulated poultry manure (N170) + bio-input No. 2 3
CLM170cattle litter manure (N170) 3
GCM170granulated cattle manure (N170) 3
GCM170 + Agranulated cattle manure (N170) + bio-input No. 1 3
GCM170 + Tgranulated cattle manure (N170) + bio-input No. 2 3
GPM85 + MFgranulated poultry manure (N85) 2 + mineral fertilizers (N60) 1
GCM85 + MFgranulated cattle manure (N85) 2 + mineral fertilizers (N60) 1
1 N60 kg ha−1 nitrogen fertilizer rate. 2 N85 kg ha−1 organic fertilizer rate calculated based on 85 kg ha−1 of nitrogen-active substance. 3 N170 kg ha−1 organic fertilizer rate calculated based on 170 kg ha−1 of nitrogen-active substance.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sivojienė, D.; Masevičienė, A.; Žičkienė, L.; Ražukas, A.; Kačergius, A. Soil Microbial Community Structure and Carbon Stocks Following Fertilization with Organic Fertilizers and Biological Inputs. Biology 2024, 13, 534. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13070534

AMA Style

Sivojienė D, Masevičienė A, Žičkienė L, Ražukas A, Kačergius A. Soil Microbial Community Structure and Carbon Stocks Following Fertilization with Organic Fertilizers and Biological Inputs. Biology. 2024; 13(7):534. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13070534

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sivojienė, Diana, Aistė Masevičienė, Lina Žičkienė, Almantas Ražukas, and Audrius Kačergius. 2024. "Soil Microbial Community Structure and Carbon Stocks Following Fertilization with Organic Fertilizers and Biological Inputs" Biology 13, no. 7: 534. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13070534

APA Style

Sivojienė, D., Masevičienė, A., Žičkienė, L., Ražukas, A., & Kačergius, A. (2024). Soil Microbial Community Structure and Carbon Stocks Following Fertilization with Organic Fertilizers and Biological Inputs. Biology, 13(7), 534. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13070534

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop