Next Article in Journal
Inflammation and Tumor Progression: The Differential Impact of SAA in Breast Cancer Models
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of New Tropicoporus Species (Basidiomycota, Hymenochaetales, Hymenochaetaceae) Discovered in Tamil Nadu, India
Previous Article in Journal
Addition of Mitoquinone (MitoQ) to Fresh Human Sperm Enhances Sperm Motility without Attenuating Viability
Previous Article in Special Issue
The A226D Mutation of OmpC Leads to Increased Susceptibility to β-Lactam Antibiotics in Escherichia coli
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 13
Issue 9
10.3390/biology13090652
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Putative Virulence Plasmid pYR4 of the Fish Pathogen Yersinia ruckeri Is Conjugative and Stabilized by a HigBA Toxin–Antitoxin System

by
Fisentzos Floras
†,
Chantell Mawere
†,
Manvir Singh
†,
Victoria Wootton
†,
Luke Hamstead
,
Gareth McVicker
* and
Jack C. Leo
*
Antimicrobial Resistance, Omics and Microbiota Group, Department of Biosciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biology 2024, 13(9), 652; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090652
Submission received: 19 July 2024 / Revised: 19 August 2024 / Accepted: 21 August 2024 / Published: 23 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Microbial Biology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The bacterium Yersinia ruckeri causes enteric redmouth disease, which affects salmonid fish, including farmed fish such as Atlantic salmon and rainbow trout, leading to significant commercial losses. In this study, we investigated a plasmid (an independently replicating DNA molecule) called pYR4 that is suspected of aiding Y. ruckeri in causing disease by producing adhesive structures known as type 4 pili. We identified a toxin–antitoxin locus on the plasmid, higBA, which we hypothesized might prevent loss of the plasmid from the bacterial cell through “addiction” to the antitoxin HigA. HigA is quickly degraded if the plasmid is lost, whereas the toxin HigB is stable and leads to cell death in the absence of HigA. We were able to demonstrate that HigBA is a functional toxin–antitoxin system and that stabilizes pYR4. We further showed that pYR4 can transfer between bacteria by a process known as conjugation. However, loss of the pYR4 plasmid did not have an effect in a simple insect larva infection model. Further work will have to be undertaken to evaluate the role of pYR4 in enteric redmouth disease. These results will help in understanding and ultimately managing a serious disease of commercially important fish.

Abstract

The bacterium Yersinia ruckeri causes enteric redmouth disease in salmonids and hence has substantial economic implications for the farmed fish industry. The Norwegian Y. ruckeri outbreak isolate NVH_3758 carries a relatively uncharacterized plasmid, pYR4, which encodes both type 4 pili and a type 4 secretion system. In this study, we demonstrate that pYR4 does not impose a growth burden on the Y. ruckeri host bacterium, nor does the plasmid contribute to twitching motility (an indicator of type 4 pilus function) or virulence in a Galleria mellonella larval model of infection. However, we show that pYR4 is conjugative. We also reveal, through mutagenesis, that pYR4 encodes a functional post-segregational killing system, HigBA, that is responsible for plasmid maintenance within Y. ruckeri. This is the first toxin–antitoxin system to be characterized for this organism. Whilst further work is needed to elucidate the virulence role of pYR4 and whether it contributes to bacterial disease under non-laboratory conditions, our results suggest that the plasmid possesses substantial stability and transfer mechanisms that imply importance within the organism. These results add to our understanding of the mobile genetic elements and evolutionary trajectory of Y. ruckeri as an important commercial pathogen, with consequences for human food production.

1. Introduction

Farming of aquatic organisms such as fish and shellfish, or aquaculture, is an important and growing industry to meet the world’s nutritional needs. In 2021, the amount of fish produced through aquaculture equaled the amount of fish caught from wild fisheries [1], and the proportion of farmed fish is now exceeding that of wild-captured fish [2]. However, the crowded and stressful conditions in fish farms predispose the livestock to infections by bacterial, viral, and parasitic pathogens [3]. Infections in aquaculture have been estimated to cost the global economy over USD 6 billion per year [4].
One such fish pathogen is the bacterium Yersinia ruckeri, the causative agent of enteric redmouth disease (ERM). ERM affects mainly salmonid fish, including commercially important species such as Atlantic salmon and rainbow trout [5]. Though ERM has been controlled to some extent through vaccination, outbreaks caused by bio-serotypes not covered or poorly controlled by existing vaccines have occurred in recent years [6,7,8]. In addition, the pathogenesis of ERM is not well understood. Although several virulence factors of Y. ruckeri have been identified [9], their role in the disease has not been fully characterized. Therefore, investigation into the disease mechanisms of Y. ruckeri is important for understanding its pathogenesis and developing novel control measures.
The human pathogenic Yersinia species rely on plasmid-mediated virulence to cause disease [10]. Similarly, most Y. ruckeri isolates contain plasmids [11,12]. Recently, the plasmid pYR4 was discovered in the Norwegian outbreak strain NVH_3758, encoding a type 4 pilus (TFP) cluster and a type 4 secretion system (T4SS) [13]. Type 4 pili are contractile fimbrial adhesins that mediate twitching motility but are also often involved in biofilm formation, pathogenesis, or DNA uptake [14]. T4SSs (distinct structures from TFP) include conjugation apparatus [15], which is why pYR4 is presumed conjugative [13]. The tra locus of Y. ruckeri 150R, encoding a T4SS, has been implicated in virulence [16]. The region encoding this T4SS locus as well as a pil locus encoding TFP is highly similar to regions on the plasmids pYR3 and pYR4 and so is also likely plasmid-borne [13]. Due to the presence of the TFP and T4SS loci on pYR4, it has been suspected to be a virulence plasmid. Efforts to cure pYR4 were unsuccessful [13], suggesting it is stably maintained in the population.
Bioinformatic examination of pYR4 revealed a toxin–antitoxin system locus, higBA. Toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems, also known as addiction factors, encode a stable toxin and an antitoxin that is relatively unstable. If the antitoxin gene is present, the antitoxin pool can be regenerated, and the toxin is not able to exert its toxicity on the cell. However, if the antitoxin gene is lost (e.g., through curing of the plasmid encoding it), the stable toxin persists while any remaining antitoxin is degraded, leading to toxic effects resulting in cessation of growth or death of the cell. Therefore, the host bacteria become “addicted” to the plasmid because its maintenance is essential for a healthy growing population [17,18]. The HigBA module is part of a wider group of TA systems known as type II TA systems, in which both the toxin and antitoxin are proteins, and the antitoxin binds directly to and sequesters the toxin [19]. The higBA operon is unusual in that the toxin gene is transcribed upstream of the antitoxin, contrary to most type II TA operons [20]. The HigB protein itself is a ribosome-dependent mRNA endoribonuclease and is a member of the RelE family of toxins [21].
We hypothesized that the HigBA TA system of pYR4 contributes to its stability. In this study, we demonstrate that the higBA locus is a functional TA system in Y. ruckeri and that its deletion results in a reduction in the stability of pYR4. This is, to our knowledge, the first characterization of a TA system in Y. ruckeri. We further provide evidence to show that pYR4 is a conjugative plasmid. However, using a simple infection model, larvae of the greater wax moth (Galleria mellonella), we did not observe any difference in virulence between the wild-type and the plasmid-cured strains. The status of pYR4 as a virulence plasmid thus remains unresolved.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bioinformatics

Based on the previous annotation of pYR4 [13], genes encoding putative TA or partitioning systems were manually verified by additional BLASTP [22] analysis of the translated protein products. Promoter sequences were predicted using the Softberry-BPROM programme v. 1.0 [23]. Putative conjugation systems were predicted using MOB-Typer v. 3.1.9 [24].

2.2. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

The bacterial strains used in this study were Escherichia coli DH5α and Y. ruckeri NVH_3758 [25,26]. Bacteria were grown in lysogeny broth (LB) [27] and supplemented with antibiotics where necessary; ampicillin at 100 µg/mL, chloramphenicol at 25 µg/mL, and neomycin and streptomycin at 50 µg/mL. 1.5% (w/v) agar was added to prepare solid media. For experiments in minimal medium, M9 was used [28], either with glycerol at 0.2% rather than glucose, or supplemented with iron(II) sulfate (10 µM), thiamine (5 µg/mL), BME vitamins (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), and A5 trace metals (Merck). E. coli was propagated at 37 °C and Y. ruckeri at 30 °C unless otherwise indicated.

2.3. Cloning

For toxicity assays, the higB gene was amplified using Y. ruckeri NVH_3758 genomic DNA as the template using Q5 polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). Whole genome DNA was extracted from Y. ruckeri using the Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Primers (Table A1 in Appendix A) were designed to include overhangs for Gibson assembly [29] of the insert into the arabinose-inducible vector pBAD33 [30]. To produce the antitoxin construct, the entire operon (higBA, including upstream, and downstream regions) was amplified as above with overhangs complementary to the pGM101 vector [31]. Alternatively, variants of the higBA operon were cloned using mutagenic primers to produce pGM101::ΔhigB (lacking the higB gene entirely) or pGM101::higBmut (containing a higB start codon ATG → CTG mutation). Vectors were linearized by PCR and digested with DpnI to remove the circular template. The constructs were then assembled using the NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly kit (New England Biolabs), and the reaction mixtures were transformed into E. coli DH5α. Transformants were selected for using chloramphenicol (pBAD33) or ampicillin (pGM101) and insert-positive clones were screened for using colony PCR. All constructs were verified by Sanger sequencing.

2.4. Creating a higB Knockout and Introducing a Selection Marker into pYR4

To knock out the higB gene in Y. ruckeri, the upstream (US) and downstream (DS) regions (600 bp in length) of the higBA operon were amplified by PCR. In addition, the higBA promoter-higA sequence was amplified from pGM101::ΔhigB as well as a chloramphenicol resistance cassette (cat gene plus its promoter and flanking flippase recognition target sites) from pKD3 [32]. Primers (Table A1 in Appendix A) were designed such that these PCR products could be annealed through Gibson assembly to yield US-higA-cat-DS as a single DNA fragment lacking the higB gene (Figure A1a in Appendix A). This fragment was produced using the NEBuilder HiFi assembly kit, and the assembled reaction was used as a template for amplifying the US-higA-cat-DS fragment. To generate the knockout, the λ Red helper plasmid pMJH65 [33] was transformed into NVH_3758 by electroporation, and transformants were selected for on LB + ampicillin. A transformant colony was grown in LB + ampicillin at 30 °C and the λ Red recombination proteins were induced by the addition of 0.2% arabinose for an hour before harvesting the cells for electroporation. Then, 1 µg of the US-higA-cat-DS fragment was used for electroporation; the recovery medium in which the bacteria were incubated for 2 h at 30 °C was supplemented with magnesium and arabinose (LB + 10 mM MgCl2 + 0.2% arabinose). The bacteria were then plated on LB + chloramphenicol. Transformants were screened by PCR to identify clones with either insertion of the cat gene after the intact higBA operon (pYR4::cat higB+) or deletion of higB and insertion of the cat gene after higA (pYR4::cat ΔhigB) (Figure A1b in Appendix A). pMJH65 was removed by growing the bacteria overnight at 37 °C without selection and plating for single colonies, followed by screening for ampicillin-sensitive clones. The correctness of the insertions (either cat or ΔhigB cat) was verified by Sanger sequencing of the amplified hig locus. pMJH65 was a gift from Mark Liles (Addgene plasmid #67273; http://n2t.net/addgene:67273, accessed on 13 June 2024; RRID:Addgene_67273).

2.5. Plasmid Curing and Plasmid Loss Experiments

To cure pYR4, we initially grew bacteria at an elevated temperature (37 °C) for extended periods and tested for the presence of pYR4 by PCR. However, this did not result in any observable plasmid loss, and neither did transient repeated heat shocks at higher temperatures (up to 47 °C). Plasmid curing only occurred after the introduction of the pGM101::ΔhigB into NVH_3758 by electroporation and subsequent culture of a confirmed transformant at 37 °C in LB + ampicillin, followed by testing for the presence of the plasmid by PCR. Once a pYR4-negative clone had been verified, the pGM101::ΔhigB plasmid was cured by culturing in the absence of ampicillin overnight, diluting the culture 1:10,000 the following day in fresh medium, and reculturing, over the course of three days. Then the culture was plated for single colonies and ampicillin-sensitive clones were screened for by streaking individual colonies first on LB + ampicillin and then LB; clones that grew on LB but not LB + ampicillin were chosen. That these were Y. ruckeri was confirmed by 16S rDNA PCR.
To determine the effect of the higB deletion, the NVH_3758 strains with pYR4::cat derivatives (either higB+ or ΔhigB) were inoculated in biological quadruplicate in LB and grown overnight at 37 °C to stress the cells and expedite plasmid loss. The following day, the cultures were diluted 1:10,000 in fresh medium and regrown at 37 °C. This was continued for a total of 10 days. To quantify plasmid loss, dilution series of the cultures were plated onto LB with no selection and LB + chloramphenicol; only bacteria still retaining the plasmid would grow on the selection plate. We then calculated the percentage of resistant colonies in the overall viable count of the cultures.

2.6. Conjugation

To prepare recipient cells for conjugation experiments, spontaneous streptomycin-resistant mutants were isolated by plating cultures of Y. ruckeri NVH_3758 pYR4− onto LB medium with 50 µg/mL of streptomycin. After two days of culture at 30 °C, colonies were restreaked onto streptomycin medium to verify the resistance. Alternatively, we introduced a neomycin resistance marker-containing plasmid (pGM101neo) by electroporation and selection on neomycin (50 µg/mL). This plasmid was determined to be stably kept in the population during overnight culture even in the absence of selection. For conjugation, the streptomycin or neomycin-resistant pYR4- strains were used as the recipient, mixed with the pYR4::cat higB+ donor. The strains were grown in liquid medium separately overnight with selection, and then 1 mL of the cultures were pelleted at 3000× g for 5 min, washed, and then resuspended in 500 µL PBS. The donor and recipient strains were then mixed at different ratios (1:1, 2:1, 1:2) in a total of 100 µL of PBS, and this was spotted onto an LB plate without selection and grown overnight at 30 °C. The bacteria were then scraped off the plate, diluted in PBS, and plated for single colonies on counterselection plates containing chloramphenicol to select for the pYR4::cat plasmid and neomycin/streptomycin to select for the recipient, then grown overnight at 30 °C. Putative transconjugants from the chloramphenicol-neomycin plates were screened by PCR for both the pYR4 plasmid and the pGM101neo plasmid.

2.7. Toxicity Assays

Bacterial viability in response to toxin–antitoxin production was assayed according to [31]. Briefly, cells containing pBAD33::higB together with either pGM101, pGM101::higBA, pGM101::ΔhigB, or pGM101::higBmut were grown overnight in LB + ampicillin + chloramphenicol + 0.2% glucose to repress toxin expression. Cultures were then subcultured and grown to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600nm) = 0.1 in fresh media at 37 °C, before pelleting and resuspending the bacteria in prewarmed LB + ampicillin + chloramphenicol + 1% arabinose to induce toxin gene expression. At 0, 15, 30, 60, and 180 min post-induction, samples were serially diluted in PBS before plating onto LB agar + ampicillin + chloramphenicol + 0.2% glucose for quantification of the number of viable colony-forming units (CFU) at each timepoint.

2.8. Twitching Motility Assays

Twitching motility was assayed using a macroscopic twitching assay, essentially as described in [34]. Briefly, bacteria were stabbed into the center of a 1% (w/v) LB agar plate down to the agar-plastic interface. The plates were then incubated overnight at 25 °C, 30 °C, and 37 °C, with three biological triplicates for all temperatures, after which the interstitial halo was measured (no developer was added). As a positive control, we used Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14.

2.9. Galleria Infection Assays

For in vivo infection assays, we used Galleria mellonella larvae as a model (purchased from LiveFoods Direct, Sheffield, UK). Upon arrival, the larvae were checked and any blackening or pupating larvae were discarded. The larvae were then weighed and ones between 200 and 300 mg were used in the experiments. For infections, Y. ruckeri NVH_3758 pYR4+ and pYR4− strains were cultured overnight at 30 °C; the following day, subcultures were prepared and grown till an OD600nm of 0.4–0.5. These cultures were then diluted to specific CFU/mL in PBS, based on a standard curve relating CFU/mL to OD600nm. In addition to live bacteria, we also included heat-killed NVH_3758 pYR4+ (20 min at 80 °C) as a control to test whether bacterial cell components posed any toxicity to the larvae. Then, 10 Galleria were injected with each sample using 27 G needles and 1 mL syringes with a mechanical syringe pump (Cole-Parmer, St Neots, UK) at a rate of 13.21 mL/h and a volume of 10 µL per injection. Injections were made on the bottom left proleg into the hemocoel of the larvae. Inoculum doses were checked by diluting and plating from 10 µL drops from the syringe. Sterile PBS-injected and uninjected larvae were used as negative controls. Finally, 5 larvae from each group were incubated in Petri dishes at either 30 °C or 25 °C for 96 h. Scoring of the larvae’s health was performed according to the scale of Serrano et al. [35], with higher scores indicating healthy larvae.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out using GraphPad Prism v9. Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s, Dunnett’s, or Sidak’s multiple comparisons tests were performed to analyze data as appropriate. Specific tests are noted in the figure legends. Statistical significance was assumed if p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. pYR4 Carries Several Putative TA-Related Genes

The 80.8 kb putative virulence plasmid pYR4 from Y. ruckeri strain NVH_3758 (Figure 1a) contains genes potentially encoding a T4SS and TFP [13]. In addition, a manual analysis of pYR4 identified several sequences of interest for plasmid stabilization, such as genes potentially encoding two partitioning systems (StbAB and ParAG) and TA systems. TA systems and TA-related/orphaned proteins encoded within the plasmid’s so-called “stability cluster” include a putative type IV system toxin (CbtA) and its associated XRE-family antidote, lone antitoxins from the Phd, MqsA, and ParD families and an Abi-family protein. The plasmid also encodes an intact HigBA type II TA system; pYR4 HigB is 39.25% identical (50.46% similar) to the HigB-2 toxin of the Vibrio cholerae N16961 superintegron, whereas pYR4 HigA is 23.46% identical (37.75% similar) to the Vibrio HigA-2 antitoxin [21]. Interestingly, the cbtA gene is truncated by an IS6-family transposase in the pYR4-like plasmid pYR3 found in Y. ruckeri strain CSF007-82 (Figure 1b), removing the first 29 amino acids at the protein’s N-terminus and presumably the gene’s promoter, and creating a region of sequence diversity between the two plasmids upstream of the cbtA pseudogene. We therefore focused our investigation on the conserved higBA locus, which is shared between pYR3 and pYR4.

3.2. pYR4 HigBA Is a Functional Post-Segregational Killing System

In order to ascertain whether pYR4 higBA encodes a bona fide toxin–antitoxin system, both toxin and antitoxin activity were assessed. The toxin gene higB and its native ribosome binding site were cloned into the arabinose-inducible promoter on pBAD33, creating pHigB. Due to the inverted nature of the operon, three antitoxin-expressing constructs (Figure 2a) were cloned separately into compatible vector pGM101 to test their ability to abrogate toxicity: one containing the entire wild-type operon (pGM101::higBA), one containing the operon with a deletion of the higB gene (pGM101::ΔhigB) and one containing the entire operon with an A → C mutation in the start codon of higB (pGM101::higBmut), preventing its translation. Each antitoxin construct included the operon’s native promoter in order to take advantage of conditional cooperativity [36,37].
Expression of the toxin gene from pBAD33 in E. coli DH5α in the absence of antitoxin resulted in approximately 100-fold loss of cell viability at 180 min post-induction relative to strains carrying any of the three plasmid variants encoding the antitoxin (Figure 2b; p = 0.0003). Curing pYR4 from NVH_3758 (see below) allowed us to also test the effect of the TA system in its native host. Here, the effect of the toxin was far more dramatic (10,000-fold reduction in viability) but was still abolished by any of the three antitoxin constructs (Figure 2c; p < 0.0001). Hence, HigBA encoded on pYR4 is a functional and cognate toxin–antitoxin pair.
In order to test pYR4 stability under laboratory conditions, we grew Y. ruckeri NVH_3758 for several weeks with daily subculturing into fresh media. At various timepoints during the experiment, cultures were serially diluted and plated to obtain single colonies, then those colonies were tested for the presence of pYR4 using a multiplex PCR targeting key plasmid genes repA, pilN, and higB (Figure A2 in Appendix A). No evidence of plasmid loss was observed. The same was true when cultures were briefly heat-shocked to induce stress-based plasmid loss at temperatures up to 47 °C, the maximum temperature for which we obtained viable bacteria after recovery and plating. pYR4 seems, therefore, to be highly stable, in agreement with previous observations [13].
Given that we had previously shown that HigA is able to prevent HigB toxicity and hence interfere with TA system function (Figure 2), we transformed NVH_3758 with pGM101::higBmut and tested plasmid loss in the resulting transformant cells using the multiplex PCR as before. Results showed approximately 30% of colonies lacked repA and pilN (though retained the higB band, as this was present on the antitoxin vector; Figure A3 in Appendix A) within 10 days of subculture, sharply contrasting our attempts at plasmid curing without the use of HigA. Subsequent growth in non-selective medium resulted in spontaneous curing of the pGM101::higBmut vector (assessed by PCR and ampicillin sensitivity), resulting in NVH_3758_pYR4−.
Lastly, as direct proof of TA-mediated plasmid addiction, we used λ Red recombineering to construct a ΔhigB deletion at the native pYR4 locus tagged with a chloramphenicol resistance marker, and the corresponding chloramphenicol-resistant higB+ control strain. After 10 daily subcultures, pYR4ΔhigB retention (measured by chloramphenicol resistance) was only 41% of that of the higB+ plasmid (Figure 3; p < 0.0001). These results, alongside the relative ease of pYR4 curing via the pGM101::higBmut construct, are consistent with HigBA being a functional post-segregational killing system that enhances the stability of pYR4.

3.3. Qualitative Evidence of pYR4 Conjugation

Since pYR4 putatively encodes a T4SS, we surmised it may be conjugative. Analysis via MOB-Typer [24] failed to identify any conjugation machinery but suggested that the plasmid may be mobilizable; however, since MOB-Typer is by the authors’ own admission focussed on Enterobacteriaceae plasmids, its lack of recognition of Yersinia mobilization/conjugation elements is not surprising.
In order to experimentally test the conjugative capacity of pYR4, we employed the higB+ chloramphenicol-resistant variant produced previously in this work and tested its ability to transfer into either a recipient strain harboring pGM101neo, conferring neomycin resistance, or a recipient strain harboring a spontaneous streptomycin resistance mutation generated through growth on streptomycin in our laboratory. In both cases, results were impossible to quantify due to an extremely high level of background growth post-conjugation. However, larger colonies were identified as transconjugants by PCR, containing both pYR4 and pGM101neo in the relevant experiment, therefore giving qualitative evidence of successful conjugation (Figure 4). Notably, such colonies continued to grow healthily and provide positive PCR results for both recipient and donor genes when they were restreaked onto fresh medium and re-analyzed, whereas colonies taken from background growth did not grow well after restreaking.

3.4. Virulence-Related Phenotypes Encoded by pYR4

We assessed the burden of carrying pYR4 in various laboratory media but found no difference between NVH_3758 and NVH_3758_pYR4− in either growth rate or yield, regardless of media (Figure A4 in Appendix A).
Due to the presence of the putative TFP encoded by pYR4, we assessed the twitching motility of Y. ruckeri NVH_3758 and NVH_3758_pYR4− on solid media at a range of temperatures. Results (Figure 5) showed poor motility of Y. ruckeri at all temperatures under these experimental conditions regardless of the presence or absence of pYR4 (p > 0.95), whilst a Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 positive control was highly motile (p < 0.0001 compared with both Y. ruckeri strains).
Lastly, we assessed the contribution of pYR4 to Y. ruckeri virulence by comparing NVH_3758 and NVH_3758_pYR4− in a Galleria mellonella infection assay at a range of temperatures and infectious doses. Results (Figure 6) showed that G. mellonella larvae succumbed rapidly to Y. ruckeri infection at all temperatures and doses tested, regardless of the presence or absence of pYR4 (p ≥ 0.8234 between the two score curves in Figure 6; survival curves shown in Figure A5 in Appendix A). On the contrary, larvae left uninjected or those injected with PBS only or heat-killed Y. ruckeri remained healthy (vs. pYR4+: p ≤ 0.001 under all conditions).

4. Discussion

In this study, we investigated the role of the higBA locus in maintaining the plasmid pYR4 in the Y. ruckeri strain NVH_3758. We demonstrated that HigBA is a functional TA system that contributes directly to the stability of pYR4, as deletion of this system led to significant loss of the plasmid in a relatively short time (6 days, representing approximately 60 generations). Furthermore, providing the higA antitoxin gene in trans in pYR4+ cells allowed efficient curing of the plasmid; something that had failed during several previous efforts, both in this study and a previous one [13]. However, neutralizing the HigB toxin only led to ~50% loss of the plasmid even after a 10-day incubation, suggesting other components also contribute to the stability of pYR4. One of these could be the intact CbtA TA system also identified on pYR4; future work will determine its role in stabilizing pYR4 and any compound effects this may have with the HigBA system.
HigBA was originally characterized as a plasmid maintenance element in Proteus spp. [38] but has since been found in a wide range of pathogenic bacterial species including V. cholerae [21] and both enterohaemorrhagic and uropathogenic E. coli [39]. HigB is part of the RelE superfamily of endoribonuclease toxins and is encoded upstream of its cognate antitoxin, which is unusual for type II TA systems [20]. This gene organization is conserved on pYR4 and the related Y. ruckeri plasmid, pYR3. Type II TA systems, including HigBA, autoregulate operon expression via binding of the TA complex to their own promoters, in a process known as conditional cooperativity [36,37]. We cloned higA under the control of its own promoter and showed that this construct was able to abrogate the toxicity of HigB produced from an induced pBAD33 promoter, suggesting that this regulation mechanism remains intact for the pYR4 HigBA module.
The higBA locus is part of a ‘stability cluster’ found in pYR4, and our re-analysis of this region shows that some of this cluster, including higBA, is shared with pYR3. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that also pYR3 is stabilized by higBA. The cbtA type IV TA locus we identified is also shared between these two plasmids, but it is intact only in pYR4, which bolsters the argument for higBA being the main stabilizing factor of both plasmids. The stability of other Y. ruckeri plasmids has not been investigated; it is therefore not known whether the high stability of pYR4 (and presumably pYR3) mediated by higBA is unusual among Y. ruckeri plasmids, or if the others are similarly stable through some other mechanisms. Of note, pYR3 and pYR4 also encode one and two putative partitioning systems, respectively, within their stability clusters. These may contribute to plasmid maintenance, though the systems differ between the two plasmids.
Based on the presence of a T4SS, pYR4 was previously presumed to be conjugative [13]. However, the related tra operon was also implicated in virulence in a different strain of Y. ruckeri, and deletion of traI led to a reduction in virulence in a fish model [16]. The pYR4 T4SS has similarities to the Icm/Dot T4SS of Legionella pneumophila, which translocates effector proteins into eukaryotic host cells [40]. The pYR4 tra thus encodes an ‘expanded’ T4SS, which is generally virulence-related but can also be conjugation systems [15]. We provide evidence here that pYR4 is a conjugative plasmid. We were able to observe the transfer of antibiotic resistance gene-tagged pYR4 into a pYR4-negative recipient. Though we could not quantify the rate of transfer due to background growth, regardless of multiple attempts with different recipient strain markers, we could identify genuine transconjugants by PCR. These transconjugants were able to grow well when restreaked on counterselection medium, in contrast to PCR-negative colonies on the original counterselection plates. This demonstrates the transfer of the plasmid and strongly suggests that the T4SS mediates conjugation rather than virulence-related effector delivery, being the only potential conjugation apparatus encoded on pYR4. pYR4 does not encode any obvious effector proteins, further strengthening the argument that the T4SS is purely conjugative [13]. However, we cannot currently conclusively rule out whether the T4SS translocates effectors encoded on the chromosome.
If the T4SS is not virulence-related, this suggests that the TFP encoded by an adjacent locus might be responsible for the reduction in virulence observed in a previous study [16]. In our study, we did not observe twitching motility, but this is not the only function attributed to TFP. The pYR4-encoded pil locus could be involved in biofilm formation, adhesion to particular surfaces, or possibly aid T4SS-mediated conjugation by bringing bacterial cells into close proximity. TFP has been demonstrated to promote conjugation for some plasmids and other mobile genetic elements [41,42,43]. It is also possible that we did not test for twitching motility under the right conditions. We tested three temperatures, two of which are close to the optimum growth temperature of 28 °C but higher than the temperatures in which Y. ruckeri generally causes disease in fish, in waters below 20 °C [44]. Previously, the T4SS of Y. ruckeri 150R was found to be more highly expressed at 18 °C compared with 28 °C [16], and more recently higher expression was observed for many other genes at 18 °C [45]. Therefore, it is possible that the TFP may be active in generating twitching motility at lower temperatures than those we tested.
To test the hypothesis of pYR4 being a virulence plasmid, we performed infection experiments using the Galleria mellonella larvae model. This model has been used before for Y. ruckeri [46]. Previous experiments were performed at the mammalian body temperature of 37 °C, higher than the temperature optimum of Y. ruckeri. In our experiments, we tested lower temperatures, 30 °C and 25 °C. At these temperatures, ≥80% of larvae succumbed within 48 h of infection, even with a dose (2 × 103 CFU) lower than one that resulted in only ~20% mortality after 96 h at 37 °C [46]. This suggests that Y. ruckeri is indeed more virulent at lower temperatures, as proposed before [45]. We did not observe major differences in overall health scores (Figure 6) or mortality rates (Figure A5) between the tested temperatures. Nonetheless, our results suggest that if the G. mellonella model is used in the future for assessing Y. ruckeri virulence, temperatures below 30 °C should be preferred.
Contrary to our hypothesis, we did not see any effect of curing pYR4 on virulence. Again, this could be because we tested virulence at a suboptimal temperature, and the role of this plasmid would only become evident at even lower temperatures. A more probable reason is that the G. mellonella model is a very crude one, with bacteria injected directly into the hemocoel of the larvae. This is a poor mimic for the infection route in the natural fish host, where the bacteria probably enter through the gills [5], and the G. mellonella model may bypass early steps in the infection process where pYR4 plays a role. Therefore, to conclusively determine whether pYR4 and, by extension, pYR3 and others are virulence plasmids, experiments should be conducted in salmonid fish.

5. Conclusions

We have shown that the higBA locus of pYR4 encodes a functional TA system, the first to be characterized for Y. ruckeri. This system contributes to the high stability of this plasmid and deleting the toxin component higB or adding the higA antitoxin in trans allowed curing the plasmid efficiently. We further provided qualitative evidence to show that pYR4 is conjugative, suggesting the T4SS is involved in horizontal gene transfer rather than virulence. Surprisingly, deletion of pYR4 did not show a significant effect in Y. ruckeri virulence in the Galleria mellonella model. This may be because the model is not a good mimic for the natural fish host, or other conditions such as temperature were not optimal. Further research is needed to identify the role, if any, of pYR4 and other Y. ruckeri plasmids in pathogenesis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.M. and J.C.L.; infection assays, F.F. and M.S.; plasmid stability and conjugation, M.S.; cloning and toxicity assays, F.F. and V.W.; plasmid curing, C.M.; bioinformatics, L.H.; writing—original draft preparation, G.M. and J.C.L.; writing—review and editing, G.M. and J.C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are presented in the paper.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dirk Linke (University of Oslo) for providing the Y. ruckeri NVH_3758 strain. We are grateful to other members of the Antimicrobial Resistance, Omics and Microbiota group for the support and discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Primers used in this study.
Table A1. Primers used in this study.
PrimerSequence (5′ → 3′)Description
GMntu043GCATTTTTATCCATAAGATTAGCGGpBAD33 MCS (forward)
GMntu044GCGTTCTGATTTAATCTGTATCAGGpBAD33 MCS (reverse)
GMntu045CACCGTCATCACCGAAACGpGM101 insert site (forward)
GMntu046CTGTTTTATCAGACCGCTTCTGCpGM101 insert site (reverse)
GMmbiol057GGATCCTCTAGAGTCGACGCAAGGGACGAGCGTTAATGGhigB with pBAD33 overlap (forward)
GMmbiol058AAGCTTGCATGCCTGCAGCGGGGGCTTGTTATTCGATTTGhigB with pBAD33 overlap (reverse)
GMmbiol059AATCGAATAACAAGCCCCCGCTGCAGGCATGCAAGCTTpBAD33 with higB overlap (forward)
GMmbiol060CATTAACGCTCGTCCCTTGCGTCGACTCTAGAGGATCCpBAD33 with higB overlap (reverse)
GMmbiol061GCATGGCGGCTAAAGTTGTGpYR4 repA (forward)
GMmbiol062GCTAGATTATGCCTGCTCGCpYR4 repA (reverse)
GMmbiol063CCATGAGCAAGGGCGAATTGCTpYR4 pilN (forward)
GMmbiol064GCTTCAGTCATCACGCTGACATpYR4 pilN (reverse)
GMmbiol065CCCGTATTTAGCAGGCGAAGAGpYR4 higB (forward)
GMmbiol066GCTGACTTATCGATTTCAGGACpYR4 higB (reverse)
GMmbiol067CAGCGGAAAGTAGCTTGY. ruckeri 16S rDNA (forward)
GMmbiol068TGTTCAGTGCTATTAACACTTAAY. ruckeri 16S rDNA (reverse)
GMmbiol069CGCCCACAGGGTGCGCCGCTCGAAGCGGCATGCATTTACGpGM101 with higBA overlap (forward)
GMmbiol070TTGCACTTTTTGAGATGATTCCTTCGCGCGCGAATTGATCpGM101 with higBA overlap (reverse)
GMmbiol071GATCAATTCGCGCGCGAAGGAATCATCTCAAAAAGTGCAATTATTGChigBA with pGM101 overlap (forward)
GMmbiol072CGTAAATGCATGCCGCTTCGAGCGGCGCACCCTGTGGhigBA with pGM101 overlap (reverse)
GMmbiol073TCAGCAAGGGACGAGCGTTACAAGCCCCCGCACTGCGΔhigB variant (forward)
GMmbiol074CCCCGCAGTGCGGGGGCTTGTAACGCTCGTCCCTTGCTGAΔhigB variant (reverse)
GMmbiol075GCAAGGGACGAGCGTTATACGAGTATCTAGAATTCATTGAGhigB mutation variant (forward)
GMmbiol076ATGAATTCTAGATACTCGTATAACGCTCGTCCCTTGCTGACCGhigB mutation variant (reverse)
MS103GGGAGAGCTCAAAAAAGCGACTTTAGCCUpstream higBA (forward)
MS104TGAGATGATTATGACAGGTTATGAATTGCUpstream higBA (reverse)
MS105AACCTGTCATAATCATCTCAAAAAGTGCAATTATTGCACTATTTTATATTTTTATTTAGCGAGCGTATACCΔhigA (forward)
MS106TAATTCCCATGAGCGGCGCACCCTGTGGΔhigA (reverse)
MS107TGCGCCGCTCATGGGAATTAGCCATGGTCCChloramphenicol cassette (forward)
MS108TGGCCAGTAAGTGTAGGCTGGAGCTGCTTCChloramphenicol cassette (reverse)
MS109CAGCCTACACTTACTGGCCACTTCCGTGDownstream higBA (forward)
MS110TACCGCATGCAGCCGAAGCATATGTTTTGDownstream higBA (reverse)
Biology 13 00652 g0a1
Figure A1. Construct design and PCR to detect successful mutagenesis of pYR4. (a) Map of the US-higA-cat-DS fragment used for lambda Red integration into pYR4. (b) PCR of the higBA region of pYR4. L: Ladder; size (bp) shown left. NT: no template control. WT: wild type pYR4 amplicon (2280 bp). C: transformant with cat cassette integration downstream of intact higBA locus (3313 bp). Δ: transformant with cat cassette integration downstream of higB deletion (2989 bp).
Figure A1. Construct design and PCR to detect successful mutagenesis of pYR4. (a) Map of the US-higA-cat-DS fragment used for lambda Red integration into pYR4. (b) PCR of the higBA region of pYR4. L: Ladder; size (bp) shown left. NT: no template control. WT: wild type pYR4 amplicon (2280 bp). C: transformant with cat cassette integration downstream of intact higBA locus (3313 bp). Δ: transformant with cat cassette integration downstream of higB deletion (2989 bp).
Biology 13 00652 g0a1
Biology 13 00652 g0a2
Figure A2. Multiplex PCR design to detect pYR4. Taq amplification of individual gene targets and combined multiplex reaction are shown for both purified genomic DNA template and bacterial colony template. L: Ladder; size (bp) shown left. Amplicon sizes shown right.
Figure A2. Multiplex PCR design to detect pYR4. Taq amplification of individual gene targets and combined multiplex reaction are shown for both purified genomic DNA template and bacterial colony template. L: Ladder; size (bp) shown left. Amplicon sizes shown right.
Biology 13 00652 g0a2
Biology 13 00652 g0a3
Figure A3. Curing of pYR4 and helper plasmid from Y. ruckeri NVH_3758. Agarose gel electrophoresis showing (a) multiplex PCR results for colonies containing pGM101::higBmut after ten days of growth (white arrows denote pYR4-cured colonies; note the presence of the higB band due to pGM101::higBmut carriage); and eight fully plasmid-cured colonies tested for (b) pYR4 (via multiplex PCR), (c) pGM101::higBmut and (d) Y. ruckeri 16S rDNA. L: Ladder; size (bp) shown left. M: multiplex PCR positive control (unmodified Y. ruckeri NVH_3758 gDNA template). pG: pGM101::higBmut positive control (miniprep template). Amplicon sizes (bp) shown right.
Figure A3. Curing of pYR4 and helper plasmid from Y. ruckeri NVH_3758. Agarose gel electrophoresis showing (a) multiplex PCR results for colonies containing pGM101::higBmut after ten days of growth (white arrows denote pYR4-cured colonies; note the presence of the higB band due to pGM101::higBmut carriage); and eight fully plasmid-cured colonies tested for (b) pYR4 (via multiplex PCR), (c) pGM101::higBmut and (d) Y. ruckeri 16S rDNA. L: Ladder; size (bp) shown left. M: multiplex PCR positive control (unmodified Y. ruckeri NVH_3758 gDNA template). pG: pGM101::higBmut positive control (miniprep template). Amplicon sizes (bp) shown right.
Biology 13 00652 g0a3
Biology 13 00652 g0a4aBiology 13 00652 g0a4b
Figure A4. Effect of pYR4 on growth. Mean OD600nm from three technical replicates of strains NVH_3758 (“pYR4+”) or NVH_3758_pYR4− (“pYR4−”) grown at 30 °C in LB (data repeated in each panel) compared to (a) M9 supplemented with glucose, thiamine, trace metals and vitamins; (b) M9 supplemented with magnesium and glycerol; (c) DMEM supplemented with glutamine; and (d) DMEM supplemented with glutamine and 10% FBS. Representative data shown from multiple independent experiments.
Figure A4. Effect of pYR4 on growth. Mean OD600nm from three technical replicates of strains NVH_3758 (“pYR4+”) or NVH_3758_pYR4− (“pYR4−”) grown at 30 °C in LB (data repeated in each panel) compared to (a) M9 supplemented with glucose, thiamine, trace metals and vitamins; (b) M9 supplemented with magnesium and glycerol; (c) DMEM supplemented with glutamine; and (d) DMEM supplemented with glutamine and 10% FBS. Representative data shown from multiple independent experiments.
Biology 13 00652 g0a4aBiology 13 00652 g0a4b
Biology 13 00652 g0a5
Figure A5. The impact of pYR4 on Galleria mellonella survival. Larvae were left uninjected or were injected with 2 × 103 (a,b) or 4 × 103 (c,d) CFU Y. ruckeri NVH_3758 (“pYR4+”) or NVH_3758_pYR4− (“pYR4−”), or an equivalent volume of PBS or heat-killed Y. ruckeri (“pYR4+ HK”), as indicated. Larvae were incubated at either 25 °C (a,c) or 30 °C (b,d) for 96 h and their survival recorded. Assay conducted on n = 5 larvae per experimental condition. Note that these data form part of the Galleria scoring experiment in Figure 5 and are shown here for convenience of comparison only.
Figure A5. The impact of pYR4 on Galleria mellonella survival. Larvae were left uninjected or were injected with 2 × 103 (a,b) or 4 × 103 (c,d) CFU Y. ruckeri NVH_3758 (“pYR4+”) or NVH_3758_pYR4− (“pYR4−”), or an equivalent volume of PBS or heat-killed Y. ruckeri (“pYR4+ HK”), as indicated. Larvae were incubated at either 25 °C (a,c) or 30 °C (b,d) for 96 h and their survival recorded. Assay conducted on n = 5 larvae per experimental condition. Note that these data form part of the Galleria scoring experiment in Figure 5 and are shown here for convenience of comparison only.
Biology 13 00652 g0a5

References

  1. FAO. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics—Yearbook 2021; Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  2. OECD/FAO. Fish. In OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2023–2032; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2023; pp. 214–224. [Google Scholar]
  3. Segner, H.; Sundh, H.; Buchmann, K.; Douxfils, J.; Sundell, K.S.; Mathieu, C.; Ruane, N.; Jutfelt, F.; Toften, H.; Vaughan, L. Health of farmed fish: Its relation to fish welfare and its utility as welfare indicator. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 38, 85–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stentiford, G.D.; Sritunyalucksana, K.; Flegel, T.W.; Williams, B.A.P.; Withyachumnarnkul, B.; Itsathitphaisarn, O.; Bass, D. New paradigms to help solve the global aquaculture disease crisis. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kumar, G.; Menanteau-Ledouble, S.; Saleh, M.; El-Matbouli, M. Yersinia ruckeri, the causative agent of enteric redmouth disease in fish. Vet. Res. 2015, 46, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fernandez-Espinel, C.; Medina-Morillo, M.; Irgang, R.; Sotil, G.; Araya-León, H.; Flores-Dominick, V.; Romalde, J.L.; Avendaño-Herrera, R.; Yunis-Aguinaga, J. Co-existence of two Yersinia ruckeri biotypes and serotype O1a retrieved from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) farmed in Puno, Peru. J. Fish Dis. 2022, 46, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Riborg, A.; Colquhoun, D.J.; Gulla, S. Biotyping reveals loss of motility in two distinct Yersinia ruckeri lineages exclusive to Norwegian aquaculture. J. Fish Dis. 2022, 45, 641–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fouz, B.; Zarza, C.; Amaro, C. First description of non-motile Yersinia ruckeri serovar I strains causing disease in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum), cultured in Spain. J. Fish Dis. 2006, 29, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wrobel, A.; Leo, J.C.; Linke, D. Overcoming fish defences: The virulence factors of Yersinia ruckeri. Genes 2019, 10, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Carniel Arniel, E. Plasmids and Pathogenicity Islands of Yersinia. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2002, 264, 89–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Andreopoulos, W.B.; Geller, A.M.; Lucke, M.; Balewski, J.; Clum, A.; Ivanova, N.N.; Levy, A. Deeplasmid: Deep learning accurately separates plasmids from bacterial chromosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 50, e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Riborg, A.; Gulla, S.; Fiskebeck, E.Z.; Ryder, D.; Verner-Jeffreys, D.W.; Colquhoun, D.J.; Welch, T.J. Pan-genome survey of the fish pathogen Yersinia ruckeri links accessory- and amplified genes to virulence. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0285257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wrobel, A.; Ottoni, C.; Leo, J.C.; Linke, D. pYR4 from a Norwegian isolate of Yersinia ruckeri is a putative virulence plasmid encoding both a type IV pilus and a type IV secretion system. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pelicic, V. Type IV pili: E pluribus unum? Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 68, 827–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Costa, T.R.D.; Patkowski, J.B.; Macé, K.; Christie, P.J.; Waksman, G. Structural and functional diversity of type IV secretion systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 22, 170–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Méndez, J.; Fernández, L.; Menéndez, A.; Reimundo, P.; Pérez-Pascual, D.; Navais, R.; Guijarro, J.A. A chromosomally located traHIJKCLMN operon encoding a putative type IV secretion system is involved in the virulence of Yersinia ruckeri. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 937–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Qiu, J.; Zhai, Y.; Wei, M.; Zheng, C.; Jiao, X. Toxin–antitoxin systems: Classification, biological roles, and applications. Microbiol. Res. 2022, 264, 127159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Harms, A.; Brodersen, D.E.; Mitarai, N.; Gerdes, K. Toxins, targets, and triggers: An overview of toxin-antitoxin biology. Mol. Cell 2018, 70, 768–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chan, W.T.; Espinosa, M.; Yeo, C.C. Keeping the wolves at bay: Antitoxins of prokaryotic type II toxin-antitoxin systems. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2016, 3, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tian, Q.B.; Ohnishi, M.; Murata, T.; Nakayama, K.; Terawaki, Y.; Hayashi, T. Specific protein–DNA and protein–protein interaction in the hig gene system, a plasmid-borne proteic killer gene system of plasmid Rts1. Plasmid 2001, 45, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Christensen-Dalsgaard, M.; Gerdes, K. Two higBA loci in the Vibrio cholerae superintegron encode mRNA cleaving enzymes and can stabilize plasmids. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 62, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schaffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.H.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Solovyev, V.; Salamov, A. Automatic annotation of microbial genomes and metagenomic sequences. In Metagenomics and Its Applications in Agriculture, Biomedicine and Environmental Studies; Li, R.W., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers, Incorporated: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 61–78. [Google Scholar]
  24. Robertson, J.; Nash, J.H.E. MOB-suite: Software tools for clustering, reconstruction and typing of plasmids from draft assemblies. Microb. Genom. 2018, 4, e000206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wrobel, A.; Ottoni, C.; Leo, J.C.; Gulla, S.; Linke, D. The repeat structure of two paralogous genes, Yersinia ruckeri invasin (yrInv) and a “Y. ruckeri invasin-like molecule”, (yrIlm) sheds light on the evolution of adhesive capacities of a fish pathogen. J. Struct. Biol. 2018, 201, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wasteson, U.; Hvaal, A.; Serum, H.; Myhr, E.; Fossum, K. Antibacterial spectrum and some other characteristics of an antimicrobial factor produced by Yersinia ruckeri. Acta Vet. Scand. 1989, 30, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bertani, G. Studies on lysogenesis. I. The mode of phage liberation by lysogenic Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1951, 62, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Anonymous. M9 minimal medium (standard). Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2010, 2010, pdb.rec12295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gibson, D.G.; Chuang, R.; Hutchison, C.A.; Venter, J.C.; Smith, H.O.; Young, L. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat. Methods 2009, 6, 343–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guzman, L.M.; Belin, D.; Carson, M.J.; Beckwith, J. Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 4121–4130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Mcvicker, G.; Tang, C.M. Deletion of toxin–antitoxin systems in the evolution of Shigella sonnei as a host-adapted pathogen. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 2, 16204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Datsenko, K.A.; Wanner, B.L. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 6640–6645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hossain, M.J.; Thurlow, C.M.; Sun, D.; Nasrin, S.; Liles, M.R. Genome modifications and cloning using a conjugally transferable recombineering system. Biotechnol. Rep. 2015, 8, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Turnbull, L.; Whitchurch, C.B. Motility assay: Twitching motility. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1149, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Serrano, I.; Verdial, C.; Tavares, L.; Oliveira, M. The virtuous Galleria mellonella model for scientific experimentation. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Schureck, M.A.; Meisner, J.; Hoffer, E.D.; Wang, D.; Onuoha, N.; Ei Cho, S.; Lollar, P.; Dunham, C.M. Structural basis of transcriptional regulation by the HigA antitoxin. Mol. Microbiol. 2019, 111, 1449–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Overgaard, M.; Borch, J.; Jørgensen, M.G.; Gerdes, K. Messenger RNA interferase RelE controls relBE transcription by conditional cooperativity. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 69, 841–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tian, Q.B.; Ohnishi, M.; Tabuchi, A.; Terawaki, Y. A new plasmid-encoded proteic killer gene system: Cloning, sequencing, and analyzing hig locus of plasmid Rts1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1996, 220, 280–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Pandey, D.P.; Gerdes, K. Toxin-antitoxin loci are highly abundant in free-living but lost from host-associated prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 966–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, Y.; Mei, L.; Chen, J.; Chen, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, L.; Yang, A. Legionella pneumophila-mediated host posttranslational modifications. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2023, 15, mjad032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Allard, N.; Neil, K.; Grenier, F.; Rodrigue, S. The type IV pilus of plasmid TP114 displays adhesins conferring conjugation specificity and is important for DNA transfer in the mouse gut microbiota. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0230321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Carter, M.Q.; Chen, J.; Lory, S. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenicity island PAPI-1 is transferred via a novel type IV pilus. J. Bacteriol. 2010, 192, 3249–3258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ishiwa, A.; Komano, T. PilV adhesins of plasmid R64 thin pili specifically bind to the lipopolysaccharides of recipient cells. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 343, 615–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Guijarro, J.A.; Cascales, D.; García-Torrico, A.I.; García-Domínguez, M.; Méndez, J. Temperature-dependent expression of virulence genes in fish-pathogenic bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mendez, J.; Cascales, D.; Garcia-Torrico, A.I.; Guijarro, J.A. Temperature-dependent gene expression in Yersinia ruckeri: Tracking specific genes by bioluminescence during in vivo colonization. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wrobel, A.; Saragliadis, A.; Pérez-Ortega, J.; Sittman, C.; Göttig, S.; Liskiewicz, K.; Spence, M.H.; Schneider, K.; Leo, J.C.; Arenas, J.; et al. The inverse autotransporters of Yersinia ruckeri, YrInv and YrIlm, contribute to biofilm formation and virulence. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 22, 2939–2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biology 13 00652 g001
Figure 1. Map of pYR4 and its stability cluster. Predicted gene functions are indicated by colors: dark blue, TFP, and T4SS; gray, mobile genetic elements, and insertion sequences; yellow, plasmid replication; cyan, stability elements; green, genes of other predicted function; lavender, hypothetical ORFs of unknown function. (a) Linearized map of pYR4. GC content (%) is shown above by color (right) and graph height (left). Yellow bar shows the region expanded in the lower panel. (b) Expanded map of the ~18 kb stability cluster of pYR4 and its comparison to pYR3, indicating individual putative plasmid maintenance elements. Truncation of the cbtA gene in pYR3 (top) relative to pYR4 (bottom), and hence the start of sequence divergence of the plasmids, is marked by a vertical red arrow. Alignment anchored on the higBA locus. pYR3 ORFs beyond the putative stability cluster are not shown.
Figure 1. Map of pYR4 and its stability cluster. Predicted gene functions are indicated by colors: dark blue, TFP, and T4SS; gray, mobile genetic elements, and insertion sequences; yellow, plasmid replication; cyan, stability elements; green, genes of other predicted function; lavender, hypothetical ORFs of unknown function. (a) Linearized map of pYR4. GC content (%) is shown above by color (right) and graph height (left). Yellow bar shows the region expanded in the lower panel. (b) Expanded map of the ~18 kb stability cluster of pYR4 and its comparison to pYR3, indicating individual putative plasmid maintenance elements. Truncation of the cbtA gene in pYR3 (top) relative to pYR4 (bottom), and hence the start of sequence divergence of the plasmids, is marked by a vertical red arrow. Alignment anchored on the higBA locus. pYR3 ORFs beyond the putative stability cluster are not shown.
Biology 13 00652 g001
Biology 13 00652 g002
Figure 2. pYR4 encodes a functional toxin–antitoxin, HigBA. (a) Map of the 812 bp region included in pGM101::higBA and its derivatives, indicating the deletion and mutation in pGM101::ΔhigB and pGM101::higBmut, respectively. A putative σ70 promoter was predicted by SoftBerry BPROM [23]. (b,c) Viability of bacteria after induction of higB expression from pBAD33 in the presence of antitoxin-encoding vectors or empty vector control, as indicated, in either (b) E. coli DH5α or (c) Y. ruckeri NVH_3758_pYR4−. *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001; overall effect of strain calculated by two-way ANOVA (n = 3 biological replicates). Bars show standard error of the mean.
Figure 2. pYR4 encodes a functional toxin–antitoxin, HigBA. (a) Map of the 812 bp region included in pGM101::higBA and its derivatives, indicating the deletion and mutation in pGM101::ΔhigB and pGM101::higBmut, respectively. A putative σ70 promoter was predicted by SoftBerry BPROM [23]. (b,c) Viability of bacteria after induction of higB expression from pBAD33 in the presence of antitoxin-encoding vectors or empty vector control, as indicated, in either (b) E. coli DH5α or (c) Y. ruckeri NVH_3758_pYR4−. *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001; overall effect of strain calculated by two-way ANOVA (n = 3 biological replicates). Bars show standard error of the mean.
Biology 13 00652 g002
Biology 13 00652 g003
Figure 3. Plasmid loss of pYR4 encoding (higB+) or lacking (ΔhigB) a functional HigBA TA system. Per cent plasmid-containing cells after the indicated number of daily subcultures in liquid media, calculated as the proportion of chloramphenicol-resistant versus total CFU grown on solid media. ns, not significant; * p < 0.05; **** p < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons tests (n ≥ 3 biological replicates). Error bars show standard error of the mean.
Figure 3. Plasmid loss of pYR4 encoding (higB+) or lacking (ΔhigB) a functional HigBA TA system. Per cent plasmid-containing cells after the indicated number of daily subcultures in liquid media, calculated as the proportion of chloramphenicol-resistant versus total CFU grown on solid media. ns, not significant; * p < 0.05; **** p < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons tests (n ≥ 3 biological replicates). Error bars show standard error of the mean.
Biology 13 00652 g003
Biology 13 00652 g004
Figure 4. Qualitative evidence of pYR4 conjugation. (a) Restreak of two representative transconjugant colonies. (b) Restreak of two representative background colonies. (c,d) PCR to detect (c) pYR4 and (d) pGM101neo. L: Ladder; size (bp) shown left. Amplicon sizes shown right. + and − in (c) are pre-conjugation donor and recipient colonies, respectively. + and − in (d) are pre-conjugation recipient and donor colonies, respectively.
Figure 4. Qualitative evidence of pYR4 conjugation. (a) Restreak of two representative transconjugant colonies. (b) Restreak of two representative background colonies. (c,d) PCR to detect (c) pYR4 and (d) pGM101neo. L: Ladder; size (bp) shown left. Amplicon sizes shown right. + and − in (c) are pre-conjugation donor and recipient colonies, respectively. + and − in (d) are pre-conjugation recipient and donor colonies, respectively.
Biology 13 00652 g004
Biology 13 00652 g005
Figure 5. Twitching motility of Y. ruckeri carrying (+) or not carrying (−) pYR4. Motility “halo” from stab point on solid media measured at the indicated temperatures after growth for 24 h. P. aeruginosa PA14 included as a highly motile control. ns, not significant; **** p < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests (n = 3 biological replicates). Error bars show standard error of the mean.
Figure 5. Twitching motility of Y. ruckeri carrying (+) or not carrying (−) pYR4. Motility “halo” from stab point on solid media measured at the indicated temperatures after growth for 24 h. P. aeruginosa PA14 included as a highly motile control. ns, not significant; **** p < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests (n = 3 biological replicates). Error bars show standard error of the mean.
Biology 13 00652 g005
Biology 13 00652 g006
Figure 6. The impact of pYR4 in a Galleria mellonella model of infection. Larvae were left uninjected or were injected with 2 × 103 (a,b) or 4 × 103 (c,d) CFU Y. ruckeri NVH_3758 (“pYR4+”) or NVH_3758_pYR4– (“pYR4−”), or an equivalent volume of PBS or heat-killed Y. ruckeri (“pYR4+ HK”), as indicated. Larvae were incubated at either 25 °C (a,c) or 30 °C (b,d) for 96 h and their health scored every 24 h according to the Galleria scoring system by Serrano et al. [35]. Bars show standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis by two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post test: ns p ≥ 0.05; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001. Assay conducted on n = 5 larvae per experimental condition.
Figure 6. The impact of pYR4 in a Galleria mellonella model of infection. Larvae were left uninjected or were injected with 2 × 103 (a,b) or 4 × 103 (c,d) CFU Y. ruckeri NVH_3758 (“pYR4+”) or NVH_3758_pYR4– (“pYR4−”), or an equivalent volume of PBS or heat-killed Y. ruckeri (“pYR4+ HK”), as indicated. Larvae were incubated at either 25 °C (a,c) or 30 °C (b,d) for 96 h and their health scored every 24 h according to the Galleria scoring system by Serrano et al. [35]. Bars show standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis by two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post test: ns p ≥ 0.05; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001. Assay conducted on n = 5 larvae per experimental condition.
Biology 13 00652 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Floras, F.; Mawere, C.; Singh, M.; Wootton, V.; Hamstead, L.; McVicker, G.; Leo, J.C. The Putative Virulence Plasmid pYR4 of the Fish Pathogen Yersinia ruckeri Is Conjugative and Stabilized by a HigBA Toxin–Antitoxin System. Biology 2024, 13, 652. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090652

AMA Style

Floras F, Mawere C, Singh M, Wootton V, Hamstead L, McVicker G, Leo JC. The Putative Virulence Plasmid pYR4 of the Fish Pathogen Yersinia ruckeri Is Conjugative and Stabilized by a HigBA Toxin–Antitoxin System. Biology. 2024; 13(9):652. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090652

Chicago/Turabian Style

Floras, Fisentzos, Chantell Mawere, Manvir Singh, Victoria Wootton, Luke Hamstead, Gareth McVicker, and Jack C. Leo. 2024. "The Putative Virulence Plasmid pYR4 of the Fish Pathogen Yersinia ruckeri Is Conjugative and Stabilized by a HigBA Toxin–Antitoxin System" Biology 13, no. 9: 652. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090652

APA Style

Floras, F., Mawere, C., Singh, M., Wootton, V., Hamstead, L., McVicker, G., & Leo, J. C. (2024). The Putative Virulence Plasmid pYR4 of the Fish Pathogen Yersinia ruckeri Is Conjugative and Stabilized by a HigBA Toxin–Antitoxin System. Biology, 13(9), 652. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090652

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop