Next Article in Journal
A MapReduce-Based Decision-Making Approach for Multiple Criteria Sorting
Previous Article in Journal
Synchronization and Patterns in Human Dynamics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Channel Selection Strategies of Chinese E-Commerce Supply Chains Under Green Governmental Subsidies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Emission Reduction Decisions in the Agricultural Supply Chain Considering Dual Fairness Concerns

School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2025, 13(5), 313; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13050313
Submission received: 3 March 2025 / Revised: 13 April 2025 / Accepted: 23 April 2025 / Published: 24 April 2025

Abstract

The challenges in reducing emissions within agricultural supply chains mainly arise from the short-term self-interested behaviors of various stakeholders. To study the impact of the agricultural producer’s dual fairness concerns toward the manufacturer and retailer on profit distribution and emission reduction decisions, this paper develops a centralized model and two decentralized models (with and without dual fairness concerns) for a three-level agricultural supply chain. The paper derives the optimal emission reduction decisions, participant profits, and overall supply chain profits under different decision-making scenarios. The main findings are as follows: First, the centralized model results in higher supply chain profit, emission reduction, and market demand compared to decentralized models, where these factors remain unchanged regardless of fairness concerns. Second, in decentralized decision-making, fairness concerns raise the agricultural producer’s profit while reducing those of the manufacturer and retailer. The manufacturer always earns the highest profit, followed by the retailer. Finally, the agricultural producer’s fairness concerns do not affect emission reduction or overall profit, but they change profit distribution, with increasing concern toward one participant decreasing their profit and increasing the other’s. These findings fill the theoretical gap in existing research and provide valuable theoretical insights for governments and stakeholders in making decisions.
Keywords: emission reduction; agricultural supply chain; fairness concern; low-carbon supply chain emission reduction; agricultural supply chain; fairness concern; low-carbon supply chain

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, H.; Zhao, Q.; Cui, H.; Guo, J.; Zhang, Q. Emission Reduction Decisions in the Agricultural Supply Chain Considering Dual Fairness Concerns. Systems 2025, 13, 313. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13050313

AMA Style

Wang H, Zhao Q, Cui H, Guo J, Zhang Q. Emission Reduction Decisions in the Agricultural Supply Chain Considering Dual Fairness Concerns. Systems. 2025; 13(5):313. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13050313

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Huanhuan, Qilan Zhao, Hanxing Cui, Junjie Guo, and Qiuxia Zhang. 2025. "Emission Reduction Decisions in the Agricultural Supply Chain Considering Dual Fairness Concerns" Systems 13, no. 5: 313. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13050313

APA Style

Wang, H., Zhao, Q., Cui, H., Guo, J., & Zhang, Q. (2025). Emission Reduction Decisions in the Agricultural Supply Chain Considering Dual Fairness Concerns. Systems, 13(5), 313. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13050313

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop