The Effect of Resource Restructuring on Supply Chain Resilience in the Context of Digital Transformation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Digital Transformation
2.1.1. Artificial Intelligence (AI)
2.1.2. Big Data Analytics
2.1.3. Digital Empowerment
2.2. Supply Chain Resilience
2.3. Related Resources That Affect Supply Chain Resilience
2.4. The Relationship Between Enterprise Digital Transformation and Supply Chain Resilience
2.5. Resource Orchestration Theory
2.6. The Application of Resource Orchestration Theory
2.7. Literature Review and Commentary
3. Methodology
3.1. Research Method
3.2. Research Case Selection
3.3. Data Collection
3.4. Data Analysis Process
3.4.1. Open Coding
3.4.2. Axial Coding
3.4.3. Selective Coding
- Motivation for resource orchestration: Compaks, established in 2014, represents a typical traditional manufacturing firm facing transformation pressures. Factors such as internal supply chain challenges, intense external competition, and shifts in national policy have created an urgent need for change. Digital transformation has become a necessary path for enhancing supply chain resilience.
- Resource orchestration under digital transformation: Compaks strategically acquires and configures supply chain resources from its broader ecosystem based on organizational needs. It then leverages digital resources to optimize management and production processes, thereby developing distinctive capabilities in operations, digital platforms, and innovation. These enhanced capabilities lead to improved supply chain resilience and value creation.
- Value creation: Based on the perspective of resource orchestration theory, Compaks improves supply chain resilience through digital transformation from the perspective of improving active and passive supply chain resilience.
3.4.4. Theoretical Saturation Test
4. Case Analysis
4.1. Theoretical Model Construction
4.2. Resource Orchestration Motivation—Market Environment Risk Perception
4.2.1. Supply-Side Risk Perception
“Despite our expertise in RV manufacturing, we still face challenges in personalized customization and end-to-end process control. This necessitates external professional support for system optimization.”(see note 2)
4.2.2. Demand-Side Risk Perception
“The complexity of parts management, frequent order modifications, and unexpected cancellations not only tie up capital but also significantly disrupt our production planning.”(see note 2)
4.3. Digital Transformation
4.3.1. Artificial Intelligence
4.3.2. Big Data Analytics
4.3.3. Digital Empowerment
4.4. Resource Orchestration Under Digital Transformation
4.4.1. Resource Construction
“The final assembly workshop provides training for newly hired employees, makes reasonable arrangements for employees on the three production lines, and collaborates deeply with the Haier Group team through remote video production.”(see note 5)
4.4.2. Capability Transformation
“Under the new supply and demand relationship, the procurement cost of raw materials such as galvanized sheet for enterprises is lower, and the production cycle of products is further compressed from 35 days to 20 days.”(see note 2)
4.4.3. Value Creation—Enhancing Supply Chain Resilience
5. Discussion
5.1. Theoretical Contribution
5.2. Limitations
5.3. Conclusions
5.4. Future Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
1 | https://k.sina.com.cn/article_6173010488_16ff0aa3801901crp2.html (accessed on 10 March 2025). |
2 | https://www.dongchedi.com/article/7143242963236176414 (accessed on 10 March 2025). |
3 | https://www.cosmoplat.com/news/detail?newsid=2918 (accessed on 10 March 2025). |
4 | https://www.haier.com/press-events/news/20220414_178880.shtml (accessed on 10 March 2025). |
5 | https://weihai.sdnews.com.cn/qc/202003/t20200317_2702951.htm (accessed on 10 March 2025). |
6 | https://finance.sina.com.cn/jjxw/2024-03-08/doc-inamqmiu2434141.shtml (accessed on 10 March 2025). |
7 | https://www.cosmoplat.com/news/detail?newsid=6321 (accessed on 10 March 2025). |
8 | https://www.dongchedi.com/article/7288198190598505018 (accessed on 10 March 2025). |
9 | https://www.haier.com/haier-ecosystem/list/20200619_130369.shtml (accessed on 10 March 2025). |
10 | https://www.sohu.com/a/887365757_121924584 (accessed on 10 March 2025). |
References
- Salun, M.; Zaslavska, K. Strategies for resilience in a dynamic world: From VUCA to BANI. Proc. Socrat. Lect. 2024, 10, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, M.H.; Huo, B.F. A review of supply chain resilience research: Theory and impact mechanisms. Supply Chain. Manag. 2020, 1, 11. [Google Scholar]
- Melnyk, S.A.; Davis, E.W.; Spekman, R.E.; Sandor, J. Outcome-driven supply chains. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2010, 51, 32–38. [Google Scholar]
- Plekhanov, D.; Franke, H.; Netland, T.H. Digital transformation: A review and research agenda. Eur. Manag. J. 2023, 41, 821–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karimi, J.; Walter, Z. The role of dynamic capabilities in responding to digital disruption: A factorbased study of the newspaper industry. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2015, 32, 39–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mutambik, I. The Role of Strategic Partnerships and Digital Transformation in Enhancing Supply Chain Agility and Performance. Systems 2024, 12, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cha, K.J.; Hwang, T.; Gregor, S. An integrative model of IT-enabled organizational transformation: A multiple case study. Manag. 2015, 53, 1755–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeow, A.; Soh, C.; Hansen, R. Aligning with new digital strategy: A dynamic capabilities approach. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2017, 27, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Resca, A.; Za, S.; Spagnoletti, P. Digital platforms as sources for organizational and strategic transformation: A case study of the Midblue project. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2013, 8, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nadkarni, S.; Prügl, R. Digital transformation: A review, synthesis and opportunities for future research. Manag. Rev. Q. 2020, 71, 233–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirmon, D.G.; Hitt, M.A.; Ireland, R.D. Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2007, 32, 273–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fletcher, G.; Grifths, M. Digital transformation during a lockdown. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 55, 102185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abdelwahed, N.A.A.; Bano, S.; Al Doghan, M.A.; Aljughiman, A.A.; Shah, N.; Soomro, B.A. Empowering women through digital technology: Unraveling the nexus between digital enablers, entrepreneurial orientation and innovations. Equal. Divers. Incl. 2024, ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, S.; Guan, Y.; Zhou, H.; Hu, F. Making Digital Technology Innovation Happen: The Role of the CEO’s Information Technology Backgrounds. Econ. Model. 2024, 140, 106866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; He, Q. Digital transformation, external financing, and enterprise resource allocation efficiency. Manag. Decis. Econ. 2024, 45, 2321–2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shehadeh, M.; Atta, A.A.B.; Al Barrak, T.; Lutfi, A.; Alrawad, M. Digital Transformation: An Empirical Analysis of Operational Efficiency, Customer Experience, and Competitive Advantage in Jordanian Islamic Banks. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2024, 12, 695–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, W.; Li, J. Digital transformation and its effect on resource allocation efficiency and productivity in Chinese corporations. Technol. Soc. 2024, 78, 102638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalil, A.; Abdelli, M.E.A.; Mogaji, E. Do Digital Technologies Influence the Relationship between the COVID-19 Crisis and SMEs’ Resilience in Developing Countries? J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022, 8, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, H.; Wang, F.; Song, G.; Liu, L. Digital Transformation on Enterprise Green Innovation: Effect and Transmission Mechanism. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public health 2022, 19, 10614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilal, M.; Xicang, Z.; Jiying, W.; Sohu, J.M.; Akhta, S. Navigating the Manufacturing Revolution: Identifying the Digital Transformation Antecedents. Manag. Decis. 2024, 62, 1775–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riva, G.; Riva, E. OS for Ind Robots: Manufacturing Robots Get Smarter Thanks to Artificial Intelligence. Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw. 2020, 23, 357–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grant, L.; Xue, X.; Vajihi, Z.; Azuelos, A.; Rosenthal, S.; Hopkins, D.; Aroutiunian, R.; Unger, B.; Guttman, A.; Afilalo, M. LO32: Artificial intelligence to predict disposition to improve flow in the emergency department. Can. J. Emerg. Med. 2020, 22, S18–S19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, D.; Preston, D.S.; Swink, M. How Big Data Analytics Affects Supply Chain Decision-Making: An Empirical Analysis. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2021, 22, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Chen, Y.; Xie, J.; Liu, C. Research on digital empowerment, innovation vitality and manufacturing supply chain resilience mechanism. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0316183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Wang, J.G.; Feng, Q.Q.; Kai, Q. A study of supply chain competitiveness under supply disruption and demand perturbation. Ind. Eng. 2021, 24, 9. [Google Scholar]
- Hull, B. The role of elasticity in supply chain performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2005, 98, 301–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heckmann, I.; Comes, T.; Nickel, S. A critical review on supply chain risk—Definition, measure and modeling. Omega-Int. J. Manag. Sci. 2015, 52, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hägele, S.; Grosse, E.; Ivanov, D. Supply chain resilience: A tertiary study. Int. J. Integr. Supply Manag. 2022, 16, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pettit, T.J.; Croxton, K.L.; Fiksel, J. The evolution of resilience in supply chain management: A retrospective on ensuring supply chain resilience. J. Bus. Logist. 2019, 40, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekanayake, E.M.A.C.; Shen, G.Q.; Kumaraswamy, M. Supply chain resilience: Mapping the knowledge domains through a bibliometric approach. Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag. 2021, 11, 705–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, A.; Mahfouz, A.; Arisha, A. Analyzing supply chain resilience: Integrating the constructs in a concept mapping framework via a systematic literature review. Supply Chain. Manag.-Int. J. 2017, 22, 16–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamalahmadi, M.; Parast, M. A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016, 171, 116–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, N.; Elliott, D.; Drake, P. Exploring the role of social capital in facilitating supply chain resilience. Supply Chain. Manag. Int. J. 2013, 18, 324–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hohenstein, N.O.; Feisel, E.; Hartmann, E.; Giunipero, L.; Maria Jesus Saenz, P.; Xenophon Koufteros, D. Research on the phenomenon of supply chain resilience a systematic review and paths for further investigation. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2015, 45, 90–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seok, H.; Kim, K.; Nof, S.Y. Intelligent contingent multi—Sourcing model for resilient supply networks. Expert Syst. Appl. 2016, 51, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.; Tian, K.; Gao, X. Supply chain resilience: Measure, risk assessment and strategies. Fundam. Res. 2025, 5, 433–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheng, K.L. Enhancing effects of supply chain resilience: Insights from trajectory and resource-based perspectives. Supply Chain. Manag.—Int. J. 2017, 22, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brusset, X.; Teller, C. Supply chain capabilities, risks, and resilience. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2017, 184, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.M.; Rha, J.S. Ambidextrous supply chain as a dynamic capability: Building a resilient supply chain. Manag. Decis. 2016, 54, 2–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hazen, B.T.; Byrd, T.A. Toward creating competitive advantage with logistics information technology. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2012, 42, 8–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roberta Pereira, C.; Christopher, M.; da Silva, A.L. Achieving supply chain resilience: The role of procurement. Supply Chain. Manag.—Int. J. 2014, 19, 626–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, X.Q. How big data analytic capability affects supply chain performance-an analysis based on supply chain resilience perspective. China Circ. Econ. 2021, 35, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lam, J.S.L.; Bai, X.W.A. quality function deployment approach to improve maritime supply chain resilience. Transp. Res. Part E—Logist. Transp. Rev. 2016, 92, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhury, M.M.H.; Quaddus, M. Supply chain readiness, response and recovery for resilience. Supply Chain. Manag.—Int. J. 2016, 21, 709–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sullivan-Taylor, B.; Branicki, L. Creating resilient smes: Why one size might not fit all. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2011, 49, 5565–5579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivanov, D.; Dolgui, A. Stress testing supply chains and creating viable ecosystems. Oper. Manag. Res. 2022, 15, 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, Q.Q.; Xu, J. The Impact of Elastic Supply Network on Enterprise Development and Implementation Strategies. J. Beijing Jiaotong Univ. Soc. Sci. Ed. 2013, 1, 61–66. [Google Scholar]
- Khalili, S.M.; Jolai, F.; Torabi, S.A. Integrated production-distribution planning in two-echelon systems: A resilience view. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2017, 55, 1040–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ponomarov, S.Y.; Holcomb, M.C. Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2009, 20, 124–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, X.T.; Xie, J.G.; Yang, H.N. Digital Transformation and Enterprise Supply Chain Resilience: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies and Suppliers. J. Zhongnan Univ. Econ. Law 2024, 03, 136–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tukamuhabwa, B.; Stevenson, M.; Busby, J. Supply chain resilience in a developing country context: A case study on the interconnectedness of threats, strategies and outcomes. Supply Chain. Manag.—Int. J. 2017, 22, 486–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaaron, A.A.M.; Backhouse, C.J. Service organisations resilience through the application of the vanguard method of systems thinking: A case study approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2014, 52, 2026–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Datta, P. Supply network resilience: A systematic literature review and future research. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2017, 28, 1387–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blackhurst, J.; Dunn, K.S.; Craighead, C.W. An empirically derived framework of global supply resiliency. J. Bus. Logist. 2011, 32, 374–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, H.; Duarte, S.; Machado, V.C. Lean, agile, resilient and green: Divergencies and synergies. Int. J. Lean Six sigma 2011, 2, 151–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, I.; Nagalingam, S.; Gurd, B. Building resilience in SMEs of perishable product supply chains: Enablers, barriers and risks. Prod. Plan. Control 2017, 28, 1236–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabler, C.B.; Richey, R.G.; Stewart, G.T. Disaster resilience through public-private short-term collaboration. J. Bus. Logist. 2017, 38, 130–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, V.; Kumar, S.; Soni, U.; Chandra, C. Supply chain resilience: Model development and empirical analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2017, 55, 6779–6800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, W. Identifying the pathways through digital transformation to achieve supply chain resilience: An fsqca approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 10867–10879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, S. Enterprise Digital Transformation and Supply Chain Resilience—Based on the Perspective of Search Matching. Dev. Econ. China 2025, 09, 68–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Y.; Leng, Y.B.; Shan, B.A. Control Supply Chain Risks in Digital Transformation: A New Way to Improve Supply Chain Resilience. J. Organ. End User Comput. 2022, 34, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, Y.; Tan, H.; Liu, L. The effects of digital transformation on supply chain resilience: A moderated and mediated model. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2024, 37, 488–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, D.L.; Liu, F.J.; Ding, W.L. Enterprise and supply chain resilience: Digital transformation based on social network analysis perspective. J. Southeast Univ. (Philos. Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2024, 26, 47–60+14+2. [Google Scholar]
- Yuan, Y.H.; Wu, D.D. Enterprise digital transformation and supply chain resilience: From the perspective of supply chain spillover. Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 2019, 11, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Faruquee, M.; Paulraj, A.; Irawan, C.A. Strategic supplier relationships and supply chain resilience: Is digital transformation that precludes trust benefcial? Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2021, 41, 1192–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, W.; Ran, W. Supply Chain Diversification, Digital Transformation, and Supply Chain Resilience: Configuration Analysis Based on fsQCA. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, H.Y.; Yu, Y.B. Study on the impact of supply chain elasticity on innovation performance in the context of digital transformation. Logist. Technol. 2019, 47, 100–103+107. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atieh Ali, A.A.; Sharabati, A.-A.A.; Allahham, M.; Nasereddin, A.Y. The Relationship between Supply Chain Resilience and Digital Supply Chain and the Impact on Sustainability: Supply Chain Dynamism as a Moderator. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juan Zhang, Xiaoming Miao, Tiantian Shang, Impact mechanism of digital transformation on supply chain resilience. Financ. Res. Lett. 2025, 76, 106993. [CrossRef]
- Ye, F.; Liu, K.; Li, L.; Lai, K.H.; Zhan, Y.; Kumar, A. Digital supply chain management in the COVID-19 crisis: An asset orchestration perspective. International. J. Prod. Econ. 2022, 245, 108396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zakharov, Y. Comparative analysis of approaches to world concepts: SPOD society, VUCA society and BANI society. Soc. Econ. 2022, 64, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helfat, C.E.; Finkelstein, S.; Mitchell, W.; Peteraf, M.; Singh, H.; Teece, D.; Winter, S.G. Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations; Blackwell: Malden, MA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Q.; Hua, Z.B. Review of Resource Scheduling Theory and Its Research Progress. Econ. Manag. 2020, 42, 193–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Z.Q.; Xu, J.F. Compilation of the Theoretical Framework of Resource View. Foreign Econ. Manag. 2002, 24, 6–13. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Q.; Yao, Y.X. Enterprise digital transformation and supply chain configuration: Centralization or diversification. China Ind. Econ. 2023, 8, 99–117. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, H.; Wei, S.; Ke, W.; Wei, K.K.; Hua, Z. The Configuration between Supply Chain Integration and Information Technology Competency: A Resource Orchestration Perspective. J. Oper. Manag. 2016, 44, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Xue, L.; Dhaliwal, J. Alignments between the Depth and Breadth of Inter-organizational Systems Deployment and Their Impact on Firm Performance. Inf. Manag. 2016, 53, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miao, F.; Wang, G.P.; Jiraporn, P. Key Supplier Involvement in IT-enabled Operations: When Does it Lead to Improved Performance? Ind. Mark. Manag. 2018, 75, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, Y.; Jia, F.; Brown, S.; Koh, L. Supply Chain Learning of Sustainability in Multi-tier Supply Chains. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2018, 38, 1061–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tuo-Chen, L.; Qiao, L. The Effect of Supply Chain Collaboration on Innovation Performance: Moderating Effects of Resource Orchestration. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE), Nomi, Japan, 17–20 August 2017; pp. 342–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gligor, D.; Holcomb, M.; Maloni, M.J.; Davis-Sramek, E. Achieving Financial Performance in Uncertain Times: Leveraging Supply Chain Agility. Transp. J. 2019, 58, 247–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gligor, D. Performance Implications of the Fit Between Suppliers’ Flexibility and Their Customers’ Expected Flexibility: A Dyadic Examination. J. Oper. Manag. 2018, 58–59, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petri, Y. Case study research in the social sciences. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 2019, 10, 30–35. [Google Scholar]
- Tasci, A.D.; Wei, W.; Milman, A. Uses and misuses of the case study method. Ann. Tour. Res. 2020, 82, 102815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, X.D.; Liang, H. Grounded theory “the jungle”, the past and into the road. J. Sci. Res. Manag. 2020, 41, 13. [Google Scholar]
- Glaserb, G.; Strauss, A.L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research; Aldine: Chicago, IL, USA, 1967; pp. 40–136. [Google Scholar]
- Jia, X.D.; Liang, H. A preliminary study on the paradigm of Chinese local management theory construction based on the “grounded spirit”. J. Manag. 2016, 13, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed.; SAGE: London, UK, 2003; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
- Eisenhardt, K.M. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1989, 1, 57–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eisenhardt, K.M. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Manag. J. 2007, 50, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Xue, K.L.; Wang, W. A Review of Research on Supply Chain Disruption Management; Nankai University Business School, China Institute of Corporate Governance: Tianjin, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Parast, M.M.; Subramanian, N. An Examination of The Effect of Supply Chain Disruption Risk Drivers on Organizational Performance: Evidence from Chinese Supply Chains. Supply Chain. Manag. Int. J. 2021, 26, 548–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, W.; Ruan, Q.; Guang, G. Private entrepreneurs’ external environment risk perception and corporate innovation investment. Res. Manag. 2021, 42, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kretschmer, T.; Leiponen, A.; Schilling, M.; Vasudeva, G. Platform ecosystems as meta-organizations: Implications for platform strategies. Strateg. Manag. J. 2022, 43, 405–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, M.; Pan, S.L. Developing focal capabilities for e-commerce adoption: A resource orchestration perspective. Inf. Manag. 2015, 52, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cutolo, D.; Kenney, M. Platform-Dependent Entrepreneurs: Power Asymmetries, Risks, and Strategies in the Platform Economy. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 2019, 35, 584–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, H.J.; Wang, J.J.; Su, Z.F. How small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises can allocate resources and utilize digital opportunities under the background of digital transformation: A study on fsQCA based on resource allocation theory. Nankai Manag. Rev. 2024, 27, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avenyo, E.K.; Tregenna, F.; Kraemer-Mbula, E. Do productive capabilities affect export performance? Evidence from African firms. Eur. J. Dev. Res. 2021, 33, 304–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ben Arfi, W.; Hikkerova, L. Corporate entrepreneurship, product innovation, and knowledge conversion: The role of digital platforms. Small Bus. Econ. 2021, 56, 1191–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheng, W.Z.; Chen, J. Research on Measurement Indicators of Innovation Capability of Small and Medium sized Manufacturing Enterprises. J. Manag. Eng. 2015, 29, 49–55. [Google Scholar]
- Li, L.; Su, F.; Zhang, W.; Mao, J.Y. Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: A capability perspective. Inf. Syst. J. 2018, 28, 1129–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini, S.; Ivanov, D.; Dolgui, A. Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2019, 125, 285–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pellegrino, R. The role of risk management in buyer-supplier relationships with a preferred customer status for total quality management. TQM J. 2020, 32, 959–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Development Logic | Case Information | Conceptualization | Categorization |
---|---|---|---|
Motivation for the organization of resource orchestration | Compaks—Australian caravan dealers: The industry started late, and the development is slow; caravan enterprises are numerous but not strong. It is difficult to scale up, the production is subject to the dealer’s orders, and the profitability of the product increases slowly. The scale is small, production is low, and there are few customers. Compaks wants to obtain orders; it can only rely on product quality.1 The caravanning industry is backward in terms of manufacturing processes and efficiency. Among many other problems, the quality of caravanning modification is not uniform, caravan leasing and travel-related support services are not perfect, and the user experience is poor. In China, the caravanning industry and caravanning tourism are still in their infancy, and caravanning enterprises generally have problems such as fragmented procurement of parts, difficulty in finding accessories, poor communication with users, a weak technical foundation, and financing difficulties.2 Compaks’ head of customs said that parts’ varieties, brands, and specifications are complicated, and customers sometimes remove parts or even cancel orders: “high-priced with all the parts that do not need to be used, not to mention the ties up funds, but also affects the implementation of the company’s production plan” (see note 2). The chairman of the board said, “Affected by the pandemic, the shortage of materials, raw material prices, poor shipping logistics and other factors impact, personalized customization for the industrial and supply chains put forward higher requirements.”3 | a1. Lack of user communication a2. Subject to dealer orders a3. Weak technical foundation a4. Over-reliance on exports a5. Financing difficulties a6. Hard-to-find accessories a7. Procurement fragmentation a8. The industry is backward a9. Weak anti-risk ability a10. Impact of the pandemic a11. Market changes | A1. Supply-side risk perception (a2, a3, a5, a6, a7, a9) A2. Demand-side risk perception (a1, a4, a8, a10, a11) |
Digital transformation | COSMOPlat integrates artificial intelligence and manufacturing technology for innovation, serving the intelligent upgrading of the manufacturing industry. Compaks has introduced the COSMOPlat MOM system to integrate various production-related data, achieving the automatic generation of production plans and precise scheduling. The procurement module of COSMOPlat uses big data analysis technology to analyze multidimensional data in real time during the procurement process, effectively screening for high-quality suppliers.4 Through digital empowerment, Compaks has utilized the “Sindar Xingda” smart RV solution from COSMOPlat.5 | a12. Artificial intelligence a13. Big data analytics a14. Digital empowerment | A3. Digital transformation (a11–13) |
Resource orchestration under digital transformation (resource building—capacity transformation—value creation) | The person in charge noted that after resuming work on February 8th, due to the impact of the pandemic, the original board supplier was unable to start work. The enterprise’s resumption of an increase in production with the COSMOPlat platform quickly solved its procurement needs.6 The chairman of Compaks has decided to co-operate with COSMOPlat to jointly create a sub-platform for the RV industry based on user experience, hoping to promote the transformation of the old and new driving forces of Kangpaisi and accelerate the transformation and upgrading of enterprise intelligent manufacturing. The enterprise has invested approximately CNY 80 million to purchase new equipment, upgrade production lines, and implement digital management systems such as ERP and PLM (see note 2). The person in charge stated that he has a strong relationship with the Haier Group team, carrying out remote collaborative production over video, providing training to newly hired employees, and improving production efficiency (see note 5) Campaigners will go to the “cloud” to seek solutions from the industrial Internet and enable intelligent digital transformation. In 2019, the headquarters of Compaks acquired cross-border supply chain platform products from the COSMOPlat platform. The platform utilizes an integrated supply chain management system deployed in the cloud to streamline a series of tedious operations related to sea freight exports, including orders, booking, dispatching vehicles, and customs clearance. Two overseas warehouses have been established in South Korea and Australia, with a total storage area of over 7000 square meters, and RV export orders continue (see note 3). Compaks purchased technology from the COSMOPlat platform for digital and intelligent transformation. The entire production process has been optimized, making Compaks the first intelligent manufacturing and interconnected factory in the RV industry in China. Traditional RVs have been upgraded to intelligent RVs, achieving shared and interconnected product design and development, production and manufacturing, iterative upgrades, and other links (see note 2). Compaks has partnered with universities such as Tsinghua University, Harbin Institute of Technology, and Shandong University of Technology to launch a new round of patent research and development. The company has established a technical team of over 150 people and invests 5% of its annual sales revenue into technology research and development. More than 120 invention patents and utility model patents are embedded in the Compaks RV (see note 6). In 2018, with the help of Sindar, an eco-friendly brand in the camping industry, “Compaks RV” transformed from enterprise- led to user-led, linking connected factories, smart appliances, connected vehicles, RV campsites, and travel enthusiasts, upgrading traditional houses and vehicles into mobile smart homes, and enhancing user experience.7 | a15. Data interworking—structured capital a16. Multi-source procurement business leadership support a17. Co-operation with Internet platforms a18. Co-building—cognitive capital a19. Purchase the device a20. Buy digital technology a21. Training digital talent a22. Establishment of relationship resource a23. Organizational changes a24. Management model change a25. Management model innovation a26. Solution change a27. Changes in production patterns a28. Enterprise intelligent manufacturing upgrade a29. Production process optimization a30. Research and development in co-operation with universities a31. R&D in co-operation with the platform a32. Based on the user perspective. a33. Establishment of new production patterns a34. Product innovation | A4. Redundant resources (a16) A5. Organizational resources (a18) A6. Technical resources (a17, a19) A7. Human resources (a21) A8. Co-operation resources (a17, a18, a30) A9. Relationship resources (a16, a18, a20) A10. Manufacturing capacity (a22–a26) A11. Digital platform capability (a27, a28, a29) A12. Innovation capability (a31–a34) |
Value creation | On the manufacturing side, COSMOPlat RV Industry Intensive Purchasing Service provides a stable supply chain solution for Compaks. The procurement module has reduced the purchase price of galvanized sheets, one of the main materials for RV production, by 12% and the overall cost of module procurement by 7.3% (see note 7). During the pandemic, Compaks relied on the resources of the COSMOPlat platform to realize a 3-day solution for lightweight caravan panels and a 1-day solution for the supply of sandwich panels (see note 7). During the pandemic, customs inspection and quarantine became difficult, there was no fixed location, and the sampling environment was poor. Compaks relied on the resources of the COSMOPlat platform and created a square cabin for inspection and quarantine in just 15 days, which facilitated inspection and quarantine work in a stable, comfortable, and safe place with the functions of intelligent air management and disinfection (see note 7). The user interaction module enables companies to receive designs and orders directly from users. Personalized customization, such as the car body color and engine power, is enabled, resulting in a 63% product premium and a 62% increase in orders (see note 7). Caravan enterprises also leverage policy support to set up “overseas warehouses” in foreign countries. In this mode, enterprises can prepare goods for export in advance according to previous orders.8 Compared with the traditional “order–production–export” mode, this results in faster delivery and a better customer experience while also helping the enterprise to flexibly adjust delivery and reduce costs according to maritime logistics, the container used, and other conditions.9 | a35. Improved procurement efficiency a36. Flexible supply and demand a37. Disruptive innovation a38. Personalized customization a39. Operational flexibility a40. Reduce costs and increase efficiency a41. Production flexibility | A13. Active supply chain resilience improvement (a37, a38, a39, a40, a41) A14. Passive supply chain resilience improvement (a36, a35) |
Main Category | Support Category | Connotation of Category |
---|---|---|
Market environment risk perception (motivation for resource orchestration) | Supply-side risk perception Demand-side risk perception | Driven by internal problems and a fiercely competitive external environment, traditional manufacturing companies need to rely on resource orchestration to deal with it. |
Digital transformation | Artificial intelligence Big data analytics Digital empowerment | Utilizing various digital technologies to achieve digital transformation. |
Resource factors affecting supply chain resilience (resource construction) | Redundant resources Technical resources Internal resources External resources | Obtain and purchase relevant resources that the enterprise lacks from the social resource pool and construct resources by combining them with existing resources according to its own needs. |
Capability related to supply chain resilience (ability conversion) | Manufacturing capability Digital platform capability Innovation capability | Combining them with existing resources according to the enterprise’s own needs. |
Improvement in supply chain resilience (value creation) | Active supply chain resilience improvement Passive supply chain resilience improvement | Resource orchestration under digital transformation can improve procurement efficiency, personalize customization, achieve cost reduction and efficiency improvements, and promote innovation while expanding new markets. The enterprise improves the active and passive resilience of the supply chain and continues to analyze its own risks and needs. |
Risk Perception Dimension | Concept Connotation | Source |
---|---|---|
Demand-side risk perception | Perception of various risks related to demand-side disruptions | [91,93] |
Supply-side risk perception | Perception of various risks related to supply-side disruptions | [91,93] |
Categories | Active Supply Chain Resilience | Passive Supply Chain Resilience |
---|---|---|
Trigger point | Intra-organizational active prevention | Organize external contingencies to force |
Quality of performance | Progressive | Radical |
Space dimension | Business level (local) → strategic level (overall) | Strategic level (overall) → business level (local) |
Time dimension | Time-slack | Time-limited |
Enhancing resilient paths | Select, acquire, and purchase the necessary digital resources, following established goals | Select, acquire, and purchase the necessary digital resources and dynamically adjust goals |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Long, H.; Zhang, H.; Wu, T.; Han, J. The Effect of Resource Restructuring on Supply Chain Resilience in the Context of Digital Transformation. Systems 2025, 13, 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13050324
Long H, Zhang H, Wu T, Han J. The Effect of Resource Restructuring on Supply Chain Resilience in the Context of Digital Transformation. Systems. 2025; 13(5):324. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13050324
Chicago/Turabian StyleLong, Huayu, Huiying Zhang, Tongzhen Wu, and Jiarui Han. 2025. "The Effect of Resource Restructuring on Supply Chain Resilience in the Context of Digital Transformation" Systems 13, no. 5: 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13050324
APA StyleLong, H., Zhang, H., Wu, T., & Han, J. (2025). The Effect of Resource Restructuring on Supply Chain Resilience in the Context of Digital Transformation. Systems, 13(5), 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13050324