Investigating the Users’ Approach to ICT Platforms in the City Management
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Conceptual and Theoretical Background
2.1. A smart Service View of Cities and Citizens
2.2. A Systems View of Cities and Citizens
3. Method
Research Pathways and Data Collection
4. Results
4.1. Reliability of Model
4.2. Testing via Structural Equation Modelling
4.3. Fitness Indexes
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions and Future Directions for Research
- -
- to enrich studies in the domain of service systems in order to better understand the role of technology and its relationships with the user;
- -
- to combine service science and system thinking as a useful interpretative lens for the understanding of social and economic dynamics;
- -
- to increase the attention given to the study of the dimensions and processes that affect the perception of users involved in a service system.
- -
- to develop multi- and trans-disciplinary studies to directly investigate the different elements able to affect the efficiency, effectiveness, and sustainability of technology in service systems;
- -
- to compare the approach to the technology in different territorial and cultural environments in order to better understand the effect of the environment on the use of technology;
- -
- to enrich competences and capabilities of policy makers in order to better approach technology on the basis of users’ perceptions and expectations.
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Structure of Questionnaire Survey
Please choose from the following list the city in which you work | |||||
Prague | |||||
South Bohemia | |||||
South Moravia | |||||
Karlovy Vary | |||||
Vysočina | |||||
Hradec Králové | |||||
Liberec | |||||
Moravian-Silesian | |||||
Olomouc | |||||
Pardubice | |||||
Plzeň | |||||
Central Bohemian | |||||
Ústí na Labem | |||||
Zlín | |||||
Please choose from the following list the class which represents the size of the city in which you work in terms of number of citizens | |||||
1–999 | |||||
1000–9999 | |||||
10,000–49,999 | |||||
50,000–99,999 | |||||
100,000–399,999 | |||||
400,000 and more | |||||
Please choose from the following list the kind of software used in your activities for the management of the city | |||||
Information systems and other tools | |||||
MS Office or similar tools | |||||
Paper administration | |||||
RPP | |||||
Please choose from the following list the kind of city in which you work | |||||
Municipality | |||||
Municipality of 2nd level (authorized municipal office) | |||||
Municipality of 3rd level (Municipality with extended powers) | |||||
ROS | |||||
Please define your evaluation of the user interface of ICT adopted for city management activities by using a 5 point scale in which ‘1 means very low’ and ‘5 means very high’ | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
Please define your satisfaction with the use of ICT adopted for city management activities by using a 5 point scale in which ‘1 means very low’ and ‘5 means very high’ | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
References
- Nam, T.; Pardo, T.A. Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, College Park, MD, USA, 12–15 June 2011; pp. 282–291.
- Krugman, P. A model of innovation, technology transfer, and the world distribution of income. J. Political Econ. 1979, 87, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arora, A.; Gambardella, A. The changing technology of technological change: General and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour. Res. Policy 1994, 23, 523–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christensen, C.M.; Horn, M.B.; Johnson, C.W. Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Lall, S. Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Dev. 1992, 20, 165–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldman, S.L.; Nagel, R.N. Management, technology and agility: The emergence of a new era in manufacturing. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 1993, 8, 18–38. [Google Scholar]
- Zahir Irani, P.E. The propagation of technology management taxonomies for evaluating investments in information systems. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2000, 17, 161–177. [Google Scholar]
- Karimi, J.; Somers, T.M.; Gupta, Y.P. Impact of information technology management practices on customer service. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2001, 17, 125–158. [Google Scholar]
- Caputo, F.; Evangelista, F.; Russo, G. Information Sharing and Communication Strategies: A Stakeholder Engagement view. In Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Digital Ecosystems; Vrontis, D., Weber, Y., Tsoukatos, E., Eds.; EuroMed Press: Cyprus, 2016; pp. 436–442. [Google Scholar]
- Del Giudice, M.; Caputo, F.; Evangelista, F. How decision systems changing? The contribution of Social Media to the management decisional liquefaction. J. Decis. Syst. 2016, 25, 214–226. [Google Scholar]
- Roco, M.C.; Bainbridge, W.S. The new world of discovery, invention, and innovation: Convergence of knowledge, technology, and society. J. Nanopart. Res. 2013, 15, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krohn, W.; Layton, E.T., Jr.; Weingart, P. The Dynamics of Science and Technology: Social Values, Technical Norms and Scientific Criteria in the Development of Knowledge; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Eshet, Y. Thinking in the digital era: A revised model for digital literacy. Issues Informing Sci. Inf. Technol. 2012, 9, 267–276. [Google Scholar]
- Palfrey, J.; Gasser, U. Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives; Basic Books: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Leeflang, P.S.; Verhoef, P.C.; Dahlström, P.; Freundt, T. Challenges and solutions for marketing in a digital era. Eur. Manag. J. 2014, 32, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McMichael, P. Development and Social Change: A Global Perspective; Sage Publications: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Pahl, G.; Beitz, W. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Bijker, W.E.; Hughes, T.P.; Pinch, T.; Douglas, D.G. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Rosner, L. The Technological Fix: How People Use Technology to Create and Solve Problems; Routledge: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Parasuraman, A. Technology Readiness Index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. J. Serv. Res. 2000, 2, 307–320. [Google Scholar]
- Maglio, P.; Bailey, J.; Gruhl, D. Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer 2007, 40, 71–77. [Google Scholar]
- Maglio, P.P.; Spohrer, J. Fundamentals of service science. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2008, 36, 18–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spohrer, J.; Maglio, P.P. The emergence of service science: Toward systematic service innovations to accelerate co-creation of value. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2008, 17, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vargo, S.L.; Akaka, M.A. Service-dominant logic as a foundation for service science: Clarifications. Serv. Sci. 2009, 1, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barile, S.; Polese, F. Smart service systems and viable service systems: Applying systems theory to service science. Serv. Sci. 2010, 2, 21–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Von Bertalanffy, L. General Systems Theory; Braziller: New York, NY, USA, 1968. [Google Scholar]
- Checkland, P. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 1981. [Google Scholar]
- Checkland, P. Systems thinking. In Rethinking Management Information Systems; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1999; pp. 45–56. [Google Scholar]
- Emery, F.E. Systems Thinking: Selected Readings; Penguin Books: New York, NY, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar]
- Forrester, J.W. System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 1994, 10, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golinelli, G.M. Viable Systems Approach (vSa): Governing Business Dynamics; Cedam: Padova, Italy, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Barile, S.; Saviano, M. Foundations of systems thinking: The structure-system paradigm. In Contributions to Theoretical and Practical Advances in Management. A Viable Systems Approach (vSa); Various Authors; International Printing: Avellino, Italy, 2011; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
- Evangelista, F.; Caputo, F.; Russo, G.; Buhnova, B. Voluntary corporate disclosure in the Era of Social Media. In The 4rd International Symposium Advances in Business Management. “Towards Systemic Approach”; E-Book Series; Caputo, F., Ed.; Business Systems: Avellino, Italy, 2016; pp. 124–128. [Google Scholar]
- Holston, J. Cities and Citizenship; Duke University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Button, K. City management and urban environmental indicators. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 40, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hambleton, R. The new city management. In Globalism and Local Democracy; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2003; pp. 147–168. [Google Scholar]
- Yaojun, Y.A.N. On Grid Management in city management. Urban Probl. 2006, 2, 76–79. [Google Scholar]
- Lusch, R.F. Reframing supply chain management: A service-dominant logic perspective. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2011, 47, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castells, M. The Informational City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring, and the Urban-Regional Process; Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Bulu, M. Upgrading a city via technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2014, 89, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Nauta, P.; Merola, B.; Caputo, F.; Evangelista, F. Reflections on the Role of University to Face the Challenges of Knowledge Society for the Local Economic Development. J. Knowl. Econ. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caputo, F.; Del Giudice, M.; Evangelista, F.; Russo, G. Corporate disclosure and intellectual capital. The light side of information asymmetry. Int. J. Manag. Financ. Account. 2016, 8, 75–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polese, F.; Caputo, F.; Carrubbo, L.; Sarno, D. The value (co)creation as peak of social pyramid. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual RESER Conference What’s Ahead in Service Research: New Perspectives for Business and Society, Naples, Italy, 8–10 September 2016; pp. 1232–1248.
- Gaspar, J.; Glaeser, E.L. Information technology and the future of cities. J. Urban Econ. 1998, 43, 136–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shepard, M. Sentient City: Ubiquitous Computing, Architecture, and the Future of Urban Space; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.H.; Phaal, R.; Lee, S.H. An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80, 286–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Camagni, R.; Capello, R.; Nijkamp, P. Towards sustainable city policy: An economy-environment technology nexus. Ecol. Econ. 1998, 24, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eade, J. Living the Global City: Globalization as Local Process; Routledge: London, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Sawyer, S.; Eschenfelder, K.R. Social informatics: Perspectives, examples, and trends. Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 427–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurstein, M. Effective use: A community informatics strategy beyond the digital divide. First Monday 2003, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anttiroiko, A.V.; Valkama, P.; Bailey, S.J. Smart cities in the new service economy: Building platforms for smart services. AI Soc. 2014, 29, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, T.P.; Lai, H.J.; Ku, Y.C. Personalized content recommendation and user satisfaction: Theoretical synthesis and empirical findings. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2006, 23, 45–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tat-Kei Ho, A. Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Adm. Rev. 2002, 62, 434–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.S.C.; Hsieh, P.L. The influence of technology readiness on satisfaction and behavioral intentions toward self-service technologies. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2007, 23, 1597–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Warner, M.E.; Hefetz, A. Managing markets for public service: The role of mixed public–private delivery of city services. Public Adm. Rev. 2008, 68, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brady, M.K.; Knight, G.A.; Cronin, J.J.; Tomas, G.; Hult, M.; Keillor, B.D. Removing the contextual lens: A multinational, multi-setting comparison of service evaluation models. J. Retail. 2005, 81, 215–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chin, W.W.; Lee, M.K. A proposed model and measurement instrument for the formation of IS satisfaction: The case of end-user computing satisfaction. In Proceedings of the Twenty First International Conference on Information Systems, Brisbane, Australia, 10–13 December 2000; pp. 553–563.
- Swindell, D.; Kelly, J.M. Linking citizen satisfaction data to performance measures: A preliminary evaluation. Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 2000, 24, 30–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Von Bertalanffy, L. The theory of open systems in physics and biology. Science 1950, 111, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Laszlo, E. The Systems View of the World a Holistic Vision for Our Time; Hampton Pr: London, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Beer, S. The Heart of Enterprise; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Beer, S. The viable system model: Its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1984, 35, 7–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espejo, R.; Harnden, R. The Viable System Model: Interpretations and Applications of Stafford Beer’s VSM; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Espejo, R. The viable system model. Syst. Pract. Action Res. 1990, 3, 219–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwaninger, M. Embodiments of organizational fitness: The Viable System Model (VSM) as a guide. Syst. Pract. 1990, 3, 249–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espejo, R.; Bowling, D.; Hoverstadt, P. The viable system model and the Viplan software. Kybernetes 1999, 28, 661–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leonard, A. The viable system model and knowledge management. Kybernetes 2000, 29, 710–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polese, F.; Carrubbo, L.; Russo, G. Managing Business Relationships: Between Service Culture and a Viable Systems Approach. Esperienze d’Impresa: Dipartimento Studi Ricerche Aziendali Università Salerno 2011, 2, 135–158. [Google Scholar]
- Badinelli, R.; Barile, S.; Ng, I.; Polese, F.; Saviano, M.; Di Nauta, P. Viable service systems and decision making in service management. J. Serv. Manag. 2012, 23, 498–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golinelli, G.M.; Barile, S.; Saviano, M.; Polese, F. Perspective shifts in marketing: Toward a paradigm change? Serv. Sci. 2012, 4, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pels, J.; Polese, F.; Brodie, R.J. Value co-creation: Using a viable systems approach to draw implications from organizational theories. Mercati Competitivita 2012, 1, 19–38. [Google Scholar]
- Polese, F.; Di Nauta, P. A viable systems approach to relationship management in SD logic and service science. Bus. Adm. Rev. Schäffer-Poeschel 2013, 73, 113–129. [Google Scholar]
- Saviano, M.; Caputo, F. Managerial choices between systems, knowledge and viability. In Contributions to Theoretical and Practical Advances in Management. A Viable Systems Approach (vSa), 2; Aracne: Roma, Italy, 2013; pp. 219–242. [Google Scholar]
- Barile, S.; Saviano, M.; Caputo, F. How Are Markets Changing? The Emergence of Consumers Market Systems. In The 3rd International Symposium Advances in Business Management. “Towards Systemic Approach”; E-Book Series; Dominici, G., Ed.; Busyness Systems: Avellino, Italy, 2014; pp. 203–207. [Google Scholar]
- Chroneer, D.; Mirijamdotter, A. Systems thinking benefits in supply change management: An illustration of the viable systems model in a Supply Chain. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Technol. Appl. 2009, 6, 227–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espejo, R.; Reyes, A. Organizational Systems: Managing Complexity with the Viable System Model; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Yolles, M.; Fink, G. Agencies, normative personalities and the Viable Systems Model. J. Organ. Transf. Soc. Chang. 2013, 8, 83–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barile, S.; Saviano, M. An introduction to a value co-creation model, viability, syntropy and resonance in dyadic interaction. Syntropy 2013, 2, 69–89. [Google Scholar]
- Iandolo, F.; Calabrese, M.; Antonucci, E.; Caputo, F. Towards a value co-creation based healthcare system. In The 2013 Naples Forum on Service. Service Dominant Logic, Networks & Systems Theory and Service Science: Integrating Three Perspective for a New Service Agenda; Giannini: Napoli, Italy, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Saviano, M.; Parida, R.; Caputo, F.; Kumar Datta, S. Health care as a worldwide concern. Insights on the Italian and Indian health care systems and PPPs from a vSa perspective. Euro. Med. J. Bus. 2014, 9, 198–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kafai, Y.B.; Resnick, M. Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in a Digital World; Routledge: London, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Saviano, M.; Caputo, F.; Formisano, V.; Walletzký, L. From theory to practice in systems studies: A focus on Smart Cities. In The 4rd International Symposium Advances in Business Management. “Towards Systemic Approach”; Caputo, F., Ed.; Busyness Systems: Avellino, Italy, 2016; pp. 207–213. [Google Scholar]
- Caputo, F.; Formisano, V.; Buhnova, B.; Walletzky, L. Beyond the digital ecosystems view: Insights from Smart Communities. In Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Digital Ecosystems; Vrontis, D., Weber, Y., Tsoukatos, E., Eds.; EuroMed Press: Cyprus, 2016; pp. 443–454. [Google Scholar]
- Hodson, M.; Marvin, S. Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Res. Policy 2010, 39, 477–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verhoef, P.C.; Lemon, K.N.; Parasuraman, A.; Roggeveen, A.; Tsiros, M.; Schlesinger, L.A. Customer experience creation: Determinants, dynamics and management strategies. J. Retail. 2009, 85, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Fatta, D.; Caputo, F.; Evangelista, F.; Dominici, G. Small world theory and the World Wide Web: Linking small world properties and website centrality. Int. J. Markets Bus. Syst. 2016, 2, 126–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Von Glasersfeld, E. An introduction to radical constructivism. In The Invented Real; Watzlawick, P., Ed.; Norton: New York, NY, USA, 1984; pp. 17–40. [Google Scholar]
- Doolittle, P.E.; Hicks, D. Constructivism as a theoretical foundation for the use of technology in social studies. Theory Res. Soc. Educ. 2003, 31, 72–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barile, S.; Carrubbo, L.; Iandolo, F.; Caputo, F. From ‘EGO’ to ‘ECO’ in B2B relationships. J. Bus. Market Manag. 2013, 6, 228–253. [Google Scholar]
- Sudman, S.; Bradburn, N.M.; Schwarz, N. Thinking about Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology; Jossey-Bass: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Sperber, A.D.; Devellis, R.F.; Boehlecke, B. Cross-cultural translation methodology and validation. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 1994, 25, 501–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Champion, D.J.; Sear, A.M. Questionnaire response rate: A methodological analysis. Soc. Forces 1969, 335–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kothari, C.R. Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques; New Age International: London, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Bland, J.M.; Altman, D.G. Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 1997, 314, 572–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baumgartner, H.; Homburg, C. Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. Int. J. Res. Market. 1996, 13, 139–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byrne, B.M. Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming; Sage: London, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- MacCallum, R.C.; Browne, M.W.; Sugawara, H.M. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol. Methods 1996, 1, 130–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suduc, A.M.; Bizoi, M.; Filip, F. Exploring multimedia web conferencing. Inform. Econ. 2009, 13, 5–17. [Google Scholar]
- Shan, S.; Li, C.; Yao, W.; Shi, J.; Ren, J. An empirical study on critical factors affecting employee satisfaction. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2014, 31, 447–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansfield, E. International technology transfer: Forms, resource requirements, and policies. Am. Econ. Rev. 1975, 65, 372–376. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, S.; Todd, P.A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inf. Syst. Res. 1995, 6, 144–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Love, P.E.; Irani, Z. An exploratory study of information technology evaluation and benefits management practices of SMEs in the construction industry. Inf. Manag. 2004, 42, 227–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Powell, P. Information technology evaluation: Is it different? J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1992, 43, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, R.L. Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer; Routledge: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Katz, D.; Kahn, R.L. The Social Psychology of Organizations; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Kettinger, W.J.; Lee, C.C. Perceived service quality and user satisfaction with the information services function. Decis. Sci. 1994, 25, 737–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkis, J.; Sundarraj, R.P. Factors for strategic evaluation of enterprise information technologies. Int. J. Phys. Distri. Logist. Manag. 2000, 30, 196–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKeen, J.D.; Guimaraes, T.; Wetherbe, J.C. The relationship between user participation and user satisfaction: An investigation of four contingency factors. Mis Q. 1994, 18, 427–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Segars, A.H.; Grover, V. Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. Mis Q. 1993, 17, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avgerou, C. The significance of context in information systems and organizational change. Inf. Syst. J. 2001, 11, 43–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Der Aalst, W.M.; Ter Hofstede, A.H.; Weske, M. Business process management: A survey. In International Conference on Business Process Management; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Chalmeta, R. Methodology for customer relationship management. J. Syst. Softw. 2006, 79, 1015–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castells, M. The Network Society; Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Drucker, P.F. The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Changing Society; Transaction Publishers: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Rannenberg, K.; Royer, D.; Deuker, A. The Future of Identity in the Information Society: Challenges and Opportunities; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Caputo, F. A focus on company-stakeholder relationships in the light of the Stakeholder Engagement framework. In Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Digital Ecosystems; Vrontis, D., Weber, Y., Tsoukatos, E., Eds.; EuroMed Press: Cyprus, 2016; pp. 455–470. [Google Scholar]
Region | Frequency | Percentage | Cumulative Percentage | Distortion | Standard Deviation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prague | 31 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0.5 |
South Bohemia | 80 | 7.8 | 10.8 | 0 | 0.9 |
South Moravia | 116 | 11.2 | 22 | −0.1 | 1 |
Karlovy Vary | 21 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 0.4 |
Vysočina | 90 | 8.7 | 32.8 | 0 | 0.9 |
Hradec Králové | 67 | 6.5 | 39.2 | 0 | 0.8 |
Liberec | 28 | 2.7 | 42 | 0 | 0.5 |
Moravian-Silesian | 104 | 10.1 | 52 | 0 | 1 |
Olomouc | 76 | 7.4 | 59.4 | 0 | 0.8 |
Pardubice | 63 | 6.1 | 65.5 | 0 | 0.7 |
Plzeň | 57 | 5.5 | 71 | 0 | 0.7 |
Central Bohemian | 165 | 16 | 87 | 0 | 1.2 |
Ústí na Labem | 66 | 6.4 | 93.4 | 0 | 0.8 |
Zlín | 68 | 6.6 | 100 | 0 | 0.8 |
Total | 1032 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Number of Citizens | Frequency | Percentage | Cumulative Percentage | Distortion | Standard Deviation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1–999 | 576 | 55.8 | 55.8 | 0 | 1.6 |
1000–9999 | 316 | 30.6 | 86.4 | 0 | 1.4 |
10,000–49,999 | 86 | 8.3 | 94.8 | 0 | 0.9 |
50,000–99,999 | 18 | 1.7 | 96.5 | 0 | 0.4 |
100,000–399,999 | 24 | 2.3 | 98.8 | 0 | 0.5 |
400,000 and more | 11 | 1.1 | 99.9 | 0 | 0.3 |
Not Available | 1 | 0.1 | 100 | 0 | 0.1 |
Total | 1032 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Kind of Software | Frequency | Percentage | Cumulative Percentage | Distortion | Standard Deviation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Information systems and other tools | 556 | 53.9 | 53.9 | 0 | 1.5 |
MS Office or similar tools | 430 | 41.7 | 95.5 | 0.1 | 1.5 |
Paper administration | 44 | 4.3 | 99.8 | 0 | 0.6 |
Register of rights and obligations | 2 | 0.2 | 100 | 0 | 0.1 |
Total | 1032 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
City Size | Frequency | Percentage | Cumulative Percentage | Distortion | Standard Deviation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Municipality | 675 | 65.4 | 65.4 | 0 | 1.5 |
Municipality of 2nd level (authorized municipal office) | 171 | 16.6 | 82 | 0.1 | 1.2 |
Municipality of 3rd level (Municipality with extended powers) | 184 | 17.8 | 99.8 | 0 | 1.2 |
Romani Civic Association | 2 | 0.2 | 100 | 0 | 0.1 |
Total | 1032 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Evaluation | Frequency | Percentage | Cumulative Percentage | Distortion | Standard Deviation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 91 | 16.4 | 16.4 | −0.1 | 1.6 |
2 | 244 | 43.9 | 60.3 | 0 | 2 |
3 | 180 | 32.4 | 92.6 | 0 | 2 |
4 | 36 | 6.5 | 99.1 | 0 | 1 |
5 | 5 | 0.9 | 100 | 0 | 0.4 |
Total | 556 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Satisfaction | Frequency | Percentage | Cumulative Percentage | Distortion | Standard Deviation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 33 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 0 | 1.1 |
2 | 158 | 33.3 | 40.2 | 0 | 2.1 |
3 | 239 | 50.3 | 90.5 | 0 | 2.3 |
4 | 36 | 7.6 | 98.1 | 0 | 1.2 |
5 | 9 | 1.9 | 100 | 0 | 0.6 |
Total | 475 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Variable | Region | City Size | No of Citizens | Kind of Software | Satisfaction | Evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Region | 1 | −0.045 | −0.086 * | 0.006 | 0.067 | −0.043 |
City size | −0.045 | 1 | 0.634 * | −0.255 * | 0.019 | 0.126 * |
Number of citizens | −0.086 * | 0.634 * | 1 | −0.211 * | 0.035 | 0.143 * |
kind of software | 0.006 | −0.255 * | −0.211 * | 1 | 0.135 * | 0.027 |
Satisfaction | 0.067 | −0.019 | −0.035 | 0.135 * | 1 | 0.345 |
Evaluation | −0.043 | 0.126 * | 0.143 * | 0.027 | 0.345 * | 1 |
Variables | Kind of Relationship |
---|---|
Kind of software → Level of satisfaction | + |
Evaluation of user interface → Level of satisfaction | + |
Region → Level of satisfaction | + |
Number of citizens → Level of satisfaction | + |
City size → Level of satisfaction | + |
Variables | Cronbach’s Alpha (α) |
---|---|
Region | 0.96 |
City size | 0.84 |
Number of citizens | 0.72 |
kind of software | 0.73 |
Hypothesis | p-Value | |
---|---|---|
H1 (+) | Kind of software → Level of satisfaction | 0.631 |
H2 (+) | Evaluation of user interface → Level of satisfaction | 0.734 |
H3 (+) | Region → Level of satisfaction | 0.682 |
H4 (+) | Number of citizens → Level of satisfaction | 0.452 |
H5 (+) | City size → Level of satisfaction | 0.789 |
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Caputo, F.; Walletzký, L. Investigating the Users’ Approach to ICT Platforms in the City Management. Systems 2017, 5, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems5010001
Caputo F, Walletzký L. Investigating the Users’ Approach to ICT Platforms in the City Management. Systems. 2017; 5(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems5010001
Chicago/Turabian StyleCaputo, Francesco, and Leonard Walletzký. 2017. "Investigating the Users’ Approach to ICT Platforms in the City Management" Systems 5, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems5010001
APA StyleCaputo, F., & Walletzký, L. (2017). Investigating the Users’ Approach to ICT Platforms in the City Management. Systems, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems5010001