Next Article in Journal
Using 3D Imaging to Preoperatively Plan Facelift Procedures for the Lower Third of the Face and Neck
Next Article in Special Issue
Silymarin Alleviates Oxidative Stress and Inflammation Induced by UV and Air Pollution in Human Epidermis and Activates β-Endorphin Release through Cannabinoid Receptor Type 2
Previous Article in Journal
Skin Anti-Aging Efficacy of a Lactobacillus plantarum GT-17F Fermented Dendrobium officinale Ingredient: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents as a Novel Bio-Based Matrix for Ready-to-Use Natural Antioxidants-Enriched Ingredients: Extraction and Formulation Optimization
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Brassica oleracea Accelerates Third-Degree Burn Healing in Rats

by
Lyvia Lopes Miranda
1,
Mariáurea Matias Sarandy
1,
Luciana Schulthais Altoé
1,
Daniel Silva Sena Bastos
1,
Fabiana Cristina Silveira Alves Melo
2,
Rômulo Dias Novaes
3,
Debora Araújo Esposito
4 and
Reggiani Vilela Gonçalves
1,2,*
1
Department of General Biology, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa 36579-900, Minas Gerais, Brazil
2
Department of Animal Biology, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, Minas Gerais, Brazil
3
Department of Structural Biology, Universidade Federal de Alfenas, Alfenas 37130-001, Minas Gerais, Brazil
4
Department of Animal Science, Regenerative Medicine, Plants for Human Health Institute, North Carolina State University, Kannapolis, NC 28081, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cosmetics 2024, 11(1), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics11010027
Submission received: 23 November 2023 / Revised: 15 January 2024 / Accepted: 31 January 2024 / Published: 9 February 2024

Abstract

:
Burns account for more than 265,000 deaths per year in the world, mainly associated with infections. Therefore, the shorter the healing time, the better the prognosis. Based on this, the objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of an ointment based on Brassica oleracea var. capitata extract in the third-degree healing process. Twenty-five male Wistar rats (335 ± 16 g, three months of life) were individualized in cages with food and water ad libitum. After anesthesia, two circular third-degree burn wounds (12 mm in diameter) were made on the animals, which were randomly separated into five treatments (n = 5/group), i.e., SAL: saline solution 0.9%; OV: ointment vehicle; SS: silver sulfadiazine 1%; PB1: 10% B. oleracea extract; and PB2: 20% B. oleracea extract. The animals were treated with the ointment daily for eight days. Every four days, the area and the wound contraction index were evaluated. Tissue samples were taken for histopathological analysis (cellularity, blood vessels, and extracellular matrix components) and analysis of oxidative/nitrosative status (antioxidant enzymes, lipid, and protein oxidation markers, as well as nitric oxide (NO) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)). The ointment based on B. oleracea var. capitata at 10 and 20% concentrations increased the number of cells, blood vessels, and fibrous components of the extracellular matrix and the activity of antioxidant enzymes, promoting a fast and efficient cutaneous repair in third-degree burn wounds.

1. Introduction

The skin, the largest organ in the body, consists of the epidermis and dermis and is responsible for maintaining the body’s homeostasis, providing chemical, physical, and bacterial barriers [1]. Wounds caused by burns, mechanical trauma, cuts, tumors, poor blood circulation, and surgeries can compromise the structure and function of the skin [2], exposing individuals to the risk of further ulceration and infection [3].
Burn injuries affect more than 11 million people annually worldwide [4] and can be caused by heat, chemicals, electricity, and radiation, among other things. They are classified as first-degree burn (superficial, reaches the epidermis), second-degree burn (partial thickness, reaches the epidermis and a part of the dermis), and third-degree burn (total thickness, reaches the epidermis, dermis, hypodermis, and muscles) [5,6]. The depth of the burn is related to the time of exposure to the aggressive agent, temperature, and pressure under the tissue, and these factors usually determine the prognosis after injury [7]. The histopathological analyses of the tissue can be used to confirm the degree of the lesion. However, the cellular and parenchymal elements of the skin are compromised after an injury, making it difficult to assess the depth of the burn [8].
The cutaneous repair process is essential for the survival of all higher organisms [9] and occurs in three phases: inflammatory, proliferative, and remodeling [10]. During the first phase, the release of mediators derived from platelets, bacterial byproducts, and chemoattractants promotes tissue hemostasis [11]. In addition, leukocytes are recruited and act by eliminating leftover tissue and infections, allowing the next step to occur harmoniously and effectively [12]. In the next phase, cells and blood vessels proliferate, forming the granulation tissue, rich in blood vessels and type III collagen [13,14]. The granulation tissue, although fragile, is essential for tissue maturation and will provide the scaffold for type I collagen synthesis in the wound [15]. In the remodeling phase, type III collagen is replaced by type I, thicker and organized into bundles of fibers, providing the scar strength and resistance [16]. The end of this process involves the interaction between cells, matrix, and cytokines and results in a rapid and effective wound closure [17].
During the inflammatory phase, the recruitment of immune cells occurs in burn lesions, mainly macrophages and neutrophils, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) are formed by a process known as respiratory explosion [18]. To neutralize oxidative stress, there may be an increase in the antioxidant defense consumption, reducing the tissue’s antioxidant capacity. As a result, there is an exaggerated increase in ROS, exceeding the antioxidant system’s capacity to neutralize and eliminate them [19]. To protect the organism from oxidative damage, antioxidant enzymes are produced, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione S-transferase (GST) [20,21,22]. These enzymes act by neutralizing or preventing the formation of free radicals that can damage vital biomolecules and, consequently, the body’s tissues [23]. The decrease in antioxidant enzymes and the degradation of cellular constituents compromise the cicatricial process, leading to ineffective tissue repair [24].
Severe burns must be treated quickly to prevent infection, the leading cause of death in burn patients [25]. Therefore, adequate drugs must be available for this purpose [26] as most of the current drugs have shown antimicrobial rather than cicatrizing effects [27]. The use of medicinal plants has been increasing, since several phytochemical compounds can act synergistically to effectively inhibit microbial proliferation and stimulate wound closure [28,29]. It is also a simple and inexpensive treatment with fewer side effects [30].
Cabbage (Brassica oleraceae var. capitata) belongs to the family Brassicaceae (Cruciferae) [31] and is a plant of great economic importance due to its use in food worldwide [32]. Cabbage leaves are used in traditional medicine for wound healing and joint pain relief [33,34]. Phytochemical components of Brassica, such as glucosinolates, sulforaphans, tannins (phenolic acids), and flavonoids, are already known for their healing potential [31,35,36,37,38] and antimicrobial properties [39,40]. Based on the importance of understanding the therapeutic effects of this plant, this study aims to evaluate the effect of Brassica oleracea extract at 10 and 20% concentrations on the healing process of third-degree burns in Wistar rats.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Extract Preparation, Phytochemical Prospection, and Ointment Preparation

The leaves of Brassica oleracea var. capitata were collected from a preserved Atlantic Forest area in the Minas Gerais State, Brazil (20°43′00′′ S and 42°29′10′′ W). Extraction was carried out by maceration with ethyl alcohol (95%). Phytochemical triage for the presence of secondary metabolites was carried out according to procedures described by Harborne [41]. The ointment formulation was prepared as follows: (1) B. oleracea var. capitata ethanolic extract (10% or 20% by weight) was prepared; this concentration was chosen after preparing a systematic review and checking that the best concentration was between 10 and 20% [42]. (2) Ointment vehicle was prepared with cetostearyl alcohol, polyol–fatty acid esters, carbamide (5% by weight), ethoxylated sorbitan monooleate, petroleum jelly, methylparaben, propylparaben and butylated hydroxytoluene (10% by weight), anhydrous lanolin and demineralized water (15% by weight), hydrogenated castor oil (5% by weight). (3) Finally, the extract was incorporated into the ointment until the complete homogenization of the ointment was achieved [43].

2.2. Animals and Production of the Skin Burn

Twenty-five male Wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus; 3 months old; 335.4 ± 16 g) were housed in individual cages, and the ethical procedures were approved by CEUA/UFV (registration number: 90/2017). The rats were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of Pentobarbital (70 mg/kg) to produce the burns. The dorsolateral region of each animal was shaved, and two circular 12 mm diameter third-degree burn wounds were made simultaneously. The material was collected for the first and second burn after seven and fourteen days, respectively. Using an iron cylinder, which was heated in boiling water (100 °C) and pressed onto the animals’ backs for 30 s [22] (adapted from Partoazar et al., 2016) [44]. The wound area was measured with an analog caliper (Mitutoyo Sul Americana Ltda®, São Paulo, Brazil) [45].

2.3. Wound Area and Wound Contraction Index

The wound area and the wound contraction index were evaluated every 4 days using images scanned with 320 × 240 pixels (24 bits/pixel). The wound area was calculated by the formula, A = Π × (r)2, where r = radius. The ratio calculated the wound contraction index (WCI): initial wound area (Ao)—area on a given day (AI)/initial wound area (Ao) × 100 [46]. The healing process was analyzed in the sample collected on the last day of the experiment.

2.4. Experimental Design

The animals were randomly separated into five groups (n = 5/group): wounds treated with saline solution 0.9% (SAL); wounds treated with the ointment vehicle (OV); wounds treated with silver sulfadiazine 1% (SS); wounds treated with 10% B. oleracea extract (PB1); and wounds treated with 20% B. oleracea extract (PB2). The daily amount of ointment applied to each wound was 0.1 g.
The wounds were cleaned daily with 0.9% saline solution before ointment application. All treatments were initiated 24 hours after the wounds were created and repeated daily for eight days. The samples of regenerating tissue were collected on days zero (wound 0 = F0), four (wound 1 = F1), and eight (wound 2 = F2), repeating the previously reported anesthetic procedure for the withdrawal of the samples (Pentobarbital at 70 mg/kg). The fragments contained tissue from the center of the lesion and a part of the uninjured tissue adjacent to the edge of the lesion. The animals were euthanized at the end of the treatment by cardiac puncture exsanguination after anesthesia.

2.5. Histological Analysis

The samples collected from the wounds were fixed in 10% formaldehyde solution buffered in 0.1 M sodium phosphate (pH 7.2), dehydrated in ethyl alcohol, diaphanized in xylol, and immersed in paraffin. Histological sections (4 μm thick) were obtained by Leica Multicut® 2045 rotatory microtome (Leica Biosystems, Deer Park, IL, USA) and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin for the analysis of fibroblasts and blood vessels [47], modified Sirius Red for the study of collagen fibers (type I and type III collagen fibers) and observed under polarized light microscopy (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA) [48], Verhoeff for the elastic fiber differentiation [49], and toluidine blue for the evidence of mast cells [50]. One in ten cuts was used to avoid the repeated analysis of the tissue. Histological images were visualized and captured in a BX–60® light microscope (Olympus, São Paulo, Brazil) coupled to a QColor-3® digital camera (Olympus, São Paulo, Brazil). Five images were obtained by random cutting, with a 2592 × 1944 pixel resolution and 200× magnification. Fibroblasts and blood vessels were counted in scanned images with a grid of 300 intersections, and elastic and collagen fibers with a grid of 256 intersections, associated with a software system for image analysis Image Pro-Plus 4.5 (Media Cybernetcs®, Silver Spring, MD, USA). Mast cells were analyzed at 40× magnification in 10 random histological sections to obtain a total area (TA) of 3.11 × 106 μm2. The number of mast cells per unit of histological area was calculated according to the formula, QA = Σ mast cells/TA [51].

2.6. Antioxidant Enzymes

Fragments of the injured area were collected from each wound, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen (−196 °C), and stored in a freezer at −80 °C. The samples were homogenized in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and centrifuged at 5 °C [52]. The activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) was determined by the method using the reduction of the superoxide (O-2) and hydrogen peroxide, thereby decreasing the auto-oxidation of pyrogallol [53]. SOD activity was calculated as a unit per milligram of protein, with one unit (U) of SOD defined as the amount that inhibited the rate of pyrogallol autoxidation by 50%. Catalase activity (CAT) was determined with the Aebi method [54] using H2O2 as the substrate. The CAT activity was calculated as a unit per milligram of protein (U), where one unit of CAT activity is defined as the amount of enzyme that decomposes one mmol of H2O2 for 1 min. The glutathione S-transferase activity (GST) activity was measured using the method of Habig et al. [55] GST activity was analyzed according to the formation of glutathione-conjugated 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (CDNB). One unit of GST was defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzed the formation of one μmol of product/min/mL. GST activity was expressed as U per mg of protein.

2.7. Markers of Oxidative Stress

2.7.1. Malondialdehyde Assay

Lipid peroxidation (LPO) content was estimated with the total malondialdehyde (MDA) levels [56]. The concentration of MDA was determined by using the standard curve of known concentrations of 1, 1, 3, and 3-tetramethoxypropane (TMPO). The results were expressed as μmol/L per mg of protein [57].

2.7.2. Protein Oxidation

Protein carbonyl content was measured using 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) [58] based on the carbonyl groups reaction with DNPH. The pellets resulting from the tissue homogenates from the previous extractions were used for quantification. The results were expressed as nmol per mL of protein.

2.7.3. Nitric Oxide Production

Nitric oxide (NO) was indirectly quantified through the detection of nitrite/nitrate (NO2/NO3) levels using the standard Griess reaction [59]. A 50 μL volume of supernatants were incubated with an equal volume of Griess reagent (1% sulfanilamide, 0.1% N-(1-Naftil) etilenodiamina, and 2.5% H3PO4) and kept at room temperature for 10 min. The conversion of absorbance into the micromolar concentrations of NO was obtained from a sodium nitrite standard curve (0–125 μM) and expressed as NO concentrations (μmol/L) [60].

2.7.4. Hydrogen Peroxide Production

The hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production was measured in the supernatants of homogenates of tissues. A 50 µL volume of supernatants was incubated with 50 µL of αPhenylenediamine dihydrochloride (OPD) and an equal volume of peroxidase type II (15 mmol/L). The conversion of absorbance into the micromolar concentrations of H2O2 was obtained from a standard curve using a known concentration of H2O2. The results were expressed as μmol/L.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) software (version 9.5.1). The data were reported as mean and standard deviation of the mean (mean ± SD). The results were subjected to an analysis of variance (ANOVA) test from GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA. followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test q. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Phytochemical Prospection and Wound Area

The phytochemical prospection of B. oleracea extract revealed the presence of alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, steroids/triterpenes, and carotenoids. The wound area was smaller on day 4 (F1) and day 8 (F2) day in the groups treated with 10 and 20% B. oleracea compared to the other groups. The wound contraction index was higher in the groups treated with 20% B. oleracea compared to the other groups on day 8 (F2) (Table 1).

3.2. Histopathological Results

The number of total cells and mast cells was increased in wounds treated with PB1 on day 4 (F1) compared to the SAL, OV, and SS groups. On day 8 (F2), the total cellularity and mast cells were higher in groups PB1 and PB2 than those in SAL (Figure 1A,D–F). The number of blood vessels was higher in PB1 compared to SAL, OV, and SS on day 4. On day 8, the number of blood vessels was higher in the PB2 group compared to SAL and SS (Figure 1B,C).
The proportion of type III collagen fibers was higher in the groups treated with OV and SS compared to SAL, PB1, and PB2 on day 4. On day 8, the proportion of these fibers was lower in the groups treated with 10% B. oleracea extract (PB1) and 20% (PB2) compared to that of the other groups. The group treated with silver sulfadiazine (SS) had a lower proportion when compared to SAL (Figure 2B,E).
The proportion of type I collagen fibers was higher after treatment with 20% B. oleracea extract (PB2) than in all the other groups on day 4. On day 8, this proportion was higher in the groups treated with B. oleracea extract (10% and 20%) and SS compared to that of SAL and OV (Figure 2B). In addition, the proportion of fibers in the group treated with the highest dose of B. oleracea (PB2) was higher than that in the group receiving the lowest dose (PB1) (Figure 2A,D).
On day 4, the percentage of elastic fibers showed no statistical difference between treatments. On day 8, the proportion was higher after treatment with 20% B. oleracea extract (PB2) compared to that of SAL and OV groups (Figure 2C,F). PB1 and SS groups showed a higher proportion of elastic fibers compared to OV.

3.3. Antioxidant Enzymes

The levels SOD and CAT enzymes were higher after treatment with PB2 compared to all other groups on day 4. On day 8, the levels of these enzymes were higher than those of SAL, OV, and SS (Figure 3A,B). GST levels were higher in the PB1-treated group than in the SS group on day 4, and higher in both PB1 and PB2 groups than in the SAL and OV groups on day 8 (Figure 3C).

Oxidative Markers

MDA levels were lower in the PB1, PB2, and SS treated groups compared to the OV group on day 4 (Figure 4A). The concentration of carbonylated proteins (PCN) was lower in the PB1 and PB2 groups compared to that of SAL on day 4 (Figure 4B). On day 8, the production of nitrite and nitrate (NO2/NO3) was higher in the PB1 and PB2 groups than in the SAL group (Figure 4C). On day 8, H2O2 levels were higher in the groups treated with 10% and 20% B. oleraceae extract (PB1 and PB2) and SS compared to SAL and OV (Figure 4D).

4. Discussion

Burns occur when the skin is exposed to chemical, physical, or biological agents, resulting in tissue destruction, infection, pain, and even death [61]. For this reason, recent research has focused on finding compounds that enhance the skin repair process [62]. In the present study, we used the extract of Brassica oleracea var. capitata and evaluated its effect on the healing of skin wounds caused by third-degree burns. Brassica is a plant widely used in Brazilian cuisine, popularly known as cabbage [63], as an anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer agent [31]. The main phytochemical compounds of B. oleracea and the best extractor of these compounds have been described previously. Ahmed et al. [64] observed that ethanolic solvents contain higher amounts of phenolic compounds and consequently have higher antioxidant activity than other extractors such as petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, chloroform, and aqueous extracts. In addition to phenolics, other compounds such as alkaloids, saponins, glycosides, steroids, terpenoids [64], and carotenoids [65] are also found in Brassica extract. Our results showed a significant reduction in burns in the groups treated with 10% and 20% B. oleraceae extract. Sarandy et al. [66] demonstrated that B. oleracea var. capitata accelerated the closure of second-degree wounds in Wistar rats and increased the rate of wound contraction, preventing the development of infection. We believe that the acceleration of wound closure is probably due to the high presence of flavonoids and anthocyanins in B. oleracea extract [67,68]. These compounds have a high healing power because, in addition to their high antioxidant activity, they stimulate the formation of new blood vessels and ensure better tissue nutrition, promoting rapid recovery of damaged tissue [69,70,71].
Our results showed an increase in cells and vessels in the groups treated with B. oleracea extract, especially on the fourth day. This result was already expected, since at this stage the inflammatory process is usually accelerated and intense [72]. The chemical mediators released in the inflammatory phase stimulate collagen synthesis and consequently the formation of granulation tissue rich in vessels and cells [73,74]. High cellularity and vascularization may be related to increased cellular metabolism and possibly tissue nutrition, which are important for tissue closure [75]. Potentiation of the inflammatory process at the beginning of repair may lead to more rapid recovery of the lesion area [76]. The findings of cellularity and vascularization corroborate the wound contraction data, as in a well-vascularized tissue, cellular metabolism is high, leading to rapid and effective closure that as observed in the B. oleracea extract treated groups.
The decrease in Type III collagen and the increase in Type I collagen and elastic fibers in the groups treated with B. oleracea extract on day 8 are indicative of a high rate of tissue maturation. Type III collagen fibers, which are less thick and robust, should generally predominate at the beginning of the process during the inflammatory and proliferative phases [77], as they serve as a scaffold and support for the deposition of type I collagen, which provides greater tissue strength and resistance [45,62]. Both types of collagen are critical to a healthy healing process [78]. The higher proportion of type I collagen may be associated with a high number of cells and vessels [79], indicating the intense metabolic activity of the tissue after treatment with B. oleracea. The higher concentration of collagen in the tissue indicates high fibroblastic activity and faster wound closure [80]. These findings may also be related to the predominance of flavonoids in the extract of B. oleracea, as these compounds influence collagen synthesis and are associated with increased protein translation in the process of skin wound healing [81,82].
The decrease in malondialdehyde (MDA) and carbonylated proteins (PCN) levels in the groups treated with B. oleraceae extract indicates the high antioxidant power of this extract, which reduces tissue damage caused by lipid and protein oxidation. MDA is a byproduct of lipid peroxidation resulting from the breakdown of polyunsaturated fatty acids [83]. Intense tissue injury occurs during the burning process, and it is therefore common to find an excess of free radicals and consequently MDA in the tissue. The increase in this compound usually indicates damage to the cell membrane, often associated with a local increase in oxidative stress [84]. The level of PCN is another marker of tissue injury and indicates the level of protein oxidation [85]. The higher the level of this marker, the greater the destruction of the tissue proteins by free radical activity. Sarandy et al. [46] reported reduced MDA and PCN levels in the second intention, cutaneous wounds of Wistar rats treated with S. pseudoquina. The authors report the action of flavonoids as potent antioxidants, confirming our results with B. oleracea extract treatment.
The results shown above for oxidative stress markers corroborate our results for antioxidant enzymes, since the groups that received B. oleracea extract showed an increase in the main enzymes responsible for tissue protection, such as SOD, CAT, and GST. We can suggest that the antioxidant potential of B. oleracea extract is due to its ability to inhibit lipid and protein oxidation by stimulating the action of antioxidant enzymes, contributing to the faster and more effective tissue repair of burn wounds. The enzymes, superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione S-transferase (GST), are responsible for protecting tissues from oxidative damage caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) [86,87]. These enzymes have been previously studied and their importance in the skin repair process is well stablished [51,88,89]. Al-Roujayee [90] demonstrated that after treatment of burned Wistar rats with the phenolic compound Naringenin, there was an increase in SOD, CAT, and GST enzymes and a consequent reduction in lipid peroxidation and an increased matrix synthesis, making the scar tissue more resistant.
When a tissue is injured, there is an increase in ROS, such as superoxide anion, which scavenges tissue nitric oxide (NO), reducing its effective concentrations and signaling effects in cells [91]. Normally, NO levels in burned tissue are low due to the high concentrations of ROS and low levels of antioxidant enzymes [92]. In our study, there was an increase in NO in the groups treated with B. oleracea, which may indicate a decrease in ROS in the tissue, demonstrating the protective and antioxidant effects of the extract. NO is a molecule that regulates several physiological functions, and in some cases, elevated levels of this marker may signal tissue homeostasis [93]. Kim et al. [94] report in a literature review that the increase in NO production improves the healing process by promoting angiogenesis and assisting in the transition of the wound from the inflammatory to the proliferative healing process.
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is generated in vivo by the dismutation of the superoxide anion radical (O2−) by enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) [95]. H2O2 is rapidly generated in lesions and is an essential promoter of the inflammatory response of wound healing [96]. When H2O2 levels are elevated in a tissue, there is an increase in antioxidant enzymes such as CAT and thioredoxin peroxidases [97]. Increases in H2O2 levels have been reported under conditions of stress, such as in burn wounds [98]. In general, high levels of this molecule indicate tissue stress; however, they may also indicate an active and effective way of detoxifying cells with antioxidant enzymes. Considering the results observed in our study, we agree with the second hypothesis, and since the defense systems are overestimated, the stress markers are reduced after treatment with Brassica extract. These findings could also justify the increase of CAT in the tissues, since this enzyme uses H2O2 as a substrate. Therefore, an increased CAT may indicate the need to eliminate excess hydrogen peroxide to maintain tissue homeostasis [99].

5. Conclusions

Our results indicate that Brassica oleracea var. capitata, at 10 and 20% concentrations, accelerates the wound area closure and the proliferation of cells and blood vessels. There was a modulation of the extracellular matrix, resulting in the formation of solid and resistant scar tissue in third-degree burns. In addition, B. oleracea showed a high antioxidant potential since it is widely used in human food and has a low potential for toxicity, making it a safe treatment alternative. This study should add to the scientific knowledge of the efficacy of Brassica oleraceae in the healing process. It may help to reduce the risk of complications and in benefit patients suffering from burn injuries.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.V.G. and R.D.N.; methodology, L.L.M.; software, D.S.S.B.; validation, R.V.G., M.M.S. and R.D.N.; formal analysis, L.S.A.; investigation, F.C.S.A.M.; resources, R.V.G. and D.A.E. and R.D.N. data curation, L.L.M.; writing—original draft preparation, R.V.G. and M.M.S.; writing—review and editing, R.V.G.; visualization, R.D.N.; supervision, R.V.G.; project administration, R.V.G.; funding acquisition, R.V.G. and R.D.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Brazilian agencies: Fundação do Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG, processes PPM-00077-18, PPM-00687-17, APQ-00126-18, APQ-03519-22, and APQ-04164-22) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, processes 310331/2020-0, 423594/2018-4, 408503/2018-1, and 311105/2020-3). This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Brasil (CAPES), Finance Code 001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

“The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Federal University of Viçosa (protocol code 90/2017and date of approval was 06/06/2017)”. for studies involving animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to the roles of the Federal University of Viçosa.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ho, J.; Walsh, C.; Yue, D.; Dardik, A.; Cheema, U. Current advancements and strategies in tissue engineering for wound healing: A comprehensive review. Adv. Wound Care 2017, 6, 191–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Basu, P.; Kumar, U.N.; Manjubala, I. Wound healing materials—A perspective for skin tissue engineering. Curr. Sci. 2017, 112, 2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guo, S.; Dipietro, L.A. Factors affecting wound healing. J. Dent. Res. 2010, 89, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hamilton, T.J.; Patterson, J.; Williams, R.Y.; Ingram, W.L.; Hodge, J.S.; Abramowicz, S. Management of head and neck burns—A 15-year review. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2018, 76, 375–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bahramsoltani, R.; Farzaei, M.H.; Abdolghaffari, A.H.; Rahimi, R.; Samadi, N.; Heidari, M.; Esfandyari, M.; Baeeri, M.; Hassanzadeh, G.; Abdollahi, M.; et al. Evaluation of phytochemicals, antioxidant and burn wound healing activities of Cucurbita moschata Duchesne fruit peel. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2017, 20, 798–805. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Fekrazad, R.; Nikkerdar, A.; Joharchi, K.; Kalhori, K.A.M. Effect of laser photostimulation on the healing of third-degree burn wounds in rats. Acta Cir. Bras. 2014, 2, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Singer, A.J.; Taira, B.R.; Anderson, R.; McClain, S.A.; Rosenberg, L. Does pressure matter in creating burns in a porcine model? J. Burn Care Res. 2010, 31, 646–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ye, H.; De, S. Thermal injury of skin and subcutaneous tissues: A review of experimental approaches and numerical models. Burns 2017, 43, 909–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Takeo, M.; Lee, W.; Ito, M. Wound healing and skin regeneration. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2015, 5, a023267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mulholland, E.J.; Dunne, N.; McCarthy, H.O. MicroRNA as therapeutic targets for chronic wound healing. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2017, 8, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sun, B.K.; Siprashvili, Z.; Khavari, P.A. Advances in skin grafting and treatment of cutaneous wounds. Science 2014, 346, 941–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Curtis, B.J.; Hlavin, S.; Brubaker, A.L.; Kovacs, E.J.; Radek, K.A. Episodic binge ethanol exposure impairs murine macrophage infiltration and delays wound closure by promoting defects in early innate immune responses. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2014, 38, 1347–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hyldig, K.; Riis, S.; Pennisi, C.P.; Zachar, V.; Fink, T. Implications of extracellular matrix production by adipose tissue-derived stem cells for development of wound healing therapies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Werner, S.; Antsiferova, M. Wound healing: An orchestrated process of cell cycle, adhesion, and signaling. Encycl. Cell Biol. 2016, 3, 216–222. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chouhan, D.; Chakraborty, B.; Nandi, S.K.; Mandal, B.B. Role of non-mulberry silk fibroin in deposition and regulation of extracellular matrix towards accelerated wound healing. Acta Biomater. 2017, 48, 157–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Docheva, D.; Müller, S.A.; Majewski, M.; Evans, C.H. Biologics for tendon repair. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015, 84, 222–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bankoti, K.; Rameshbabu, A.P.; Datta, S.; Maity, P.P.; Goswami, P.; Datta, P.; Ghosh, S.K.; Mitra, A.; Dhara, S. Accelerated healing of full thickness dermal wounds by macroporous waterborne polyurethane-chitosan hydrogel scaffolds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 81, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wagener, F.A.; Carels, C.E.; Lundvig, D.M.S. Targeting the redox balance in inflammatory skin conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 9126–9167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schieber, M.; Chandel, N.S. ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, R453–R462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kirici, M.; Turk, C.; Caglayan, C.; Kirici, M. Toxic effects of copper sulfate pentahydrate on antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation of freshwater fish capoeta Umbla (Heckel, 1843) tissues. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2017, 15, 1685–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chtourou, Y.; Aouey, B.; Kebieche, M.; Fetoui, H. Protective role of naringin against cisplatin induced oxidative stress, inflammatory response and apoptosis in rat striatum via suppressing ROS-mediated NF-κB and P53 signaling pathways. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2015, 239, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Holmström, K.M.; Finkel, T. Cellular mechanisms and physiological consequences of redox-dependent signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ighodaro, O.M.; Akinloyeb, O.A. First line defence antioxidants-superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX): Their fundamental role in the entire antioxidant defence grid. Alexandria J. Med. 2017, 54, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sarandy, M.M.; Miranda, L.L.; Altoé, L.S.; Novaes, R.D.; Zanuncio, V.V.; Leite, J.P.V.; Gonçalves, R.V. Strychnos pseudoquina modulates the morphological reorganization of the scar tissue of second intention cutaneous wounds in rats. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0195786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, Y.; Beekman, J.; Hew, J.; Jackson, S.; Issler-Fisher, A.C.; Parungao, R.; Lajevardi, S.S.; Li, Z.; Maitz, P.K. Burn injury: Challenges and advances in burn wound healing, infection, pain and scarring. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018, 123, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hashmi, M.U.; Khan, F.; Khalid, N.; Shahid, A.A.; Javed, A.; Alam, T.; Jalal, N.; Hayat, M.Q.; Abbas, S.R.; Janjua, H.A. Hydrogels incorporated with silver nanocolloids prepared from antioxidant rich Aerva javanica as disruptive agents against burn wound infections. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2017, 529, 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bahramsoltani, R.; Farzaei, M.H.; Rahimi, R. Medicinal plants and their natural components as future drugs for the treatment of burn wounds: An integrative review. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2014, 306, 601–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Efferth, T.; Koch, E. Complex interactions between phytochemicals. The multi-target therapeutic concept of phytotherapy. Curr. Drug Targets 2011, 12, 122–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Akter, K.; Barnes, E.C.; Brophy, J.J.; Harrington, D.; Yaegl Community Elders; Vemulpad, S.R.; Jamie, J.F. Phytochemical profile and antibacterial and antioxidant activities of medicinal plants used by aboriginal people of New South Wales, Australia. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 2016, 4683059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rekik, D.M.; Ben Khedir, S.; Moalla, K.K.; Kammoun, N.G.; Rebai, T.; Sahnoun, Z. Evaluation of wound healing properties of grape seed, sesame, and fenugreek oils. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 2016, 7965689. [Google Scholar]
  31. Šamec, D.; Pavlović, I.; Salopek-Sondi, B. White cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. Alba): Botanical, phytochemical and pharmacological overview. Phytochem. Rev. 2017, 16, 117–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hallmann, E.; Kazimierczak, R.; Marszałek, K.; Drela, N.; Kiernozek, E.; Toomik, P.; Matt, D.; Luik, A.; Rembiałkowska, E. The nutritive value of organic and conventional white cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata) and anti-Apoptotic activity in gastric adenocarcinoma cells of sauerkraut juice produced Therof. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 8171–8183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Samuelsen, A.B.; Westereng, B.; Yousif, O.; Holtekjølen, A.K.; Michaelsen, T.E.; Knutsen, S.H. Structural features and complement-fixing activity of pectin from three Brassica oleracea varieties: White cabbage, kale, and red kale. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 644–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vale, A.P.; Cidade, H.; Pinto, M.; Oliveira, M.B.P. Effect of sprouting and light cycle on antioxidant activity of Brassica oleracea varieties. Food Chem. 2014, 165, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. De Carvalho, C.A.; da Silva, M.B.; de Oliveira, T.G.; de Matos, J.; da Rosa, M.B. Estudo espectrométrico de diferentes estágios fenológicos da Brassica oleracea var. capitata . Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2008, 18, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Prá, V.D.; Dolwitsch, C.B.; Lima, F.O.; De Carvalho, C.A.; Viana, C.; Nascimento, P.C.D.; Da Rosa, M.B. Ultrasound-assisted extraction and biological activities of extracts of Brassica oleracea var. capitata . Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2015, 53, 102–109. [Google Scholar]
  37. Nugrahedi, P.Y.; Verkerk, R.; Widianarko, B.; Dekker, M. A mechanistic perspective on process-induced changes in glucosinolate content in Brassica vegetables: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 55, 823–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hassini, I.; Baenas, N.; Moreno, D.A.; Carvajal, M.; Boughanmi, N.; Martinez Ballesta, M.D.C. Effects of seed priming, salinity and methyl jasmonate treatment on bioactive composition of Brassica oleracea var. capitata (white and red varieties) sprouts. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 2291–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hu, S.-H.; Wang, J.-C.; Kung, H.-F.; Wang, J.-T.; Lee, W.-L.; Yang, Y.-H. Antimicrobial effect of extracts of cruciferous vegetables. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2004, 20, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sotelo, T.; Lema, M.; Soengas, P.; Cartea, M.E.; Velasco, P. In vitro activity of glucosinolates and their degradation products against Brassica-Pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 81, 432–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Harborne, J.B. Phytochemical Methods; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mattosinhos, P.S.; Sarandy, M.M.; Novaes, R.D.; Esposito, D.; Goncalves, R.V. Anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant, and Skin Regenerative Potential of Secondary Metabolites from Plants of the Brassicaceae Family: A Systematic Review of In Vitro and In Vivo Preclinical Evidence (Biological Activities Brassicaceae Skin Diseases). Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Gonçalves, R.V.; Novaes, R.D.; Cupertino, M.C.; Araújo, B.M.; Vilela, E.F.; Machado, A.T.; Leite, J.P.; Matta, S.L. Bathysa cuspidata extract modulates the morphological reorganization of the scar tissue and accelerates skin wound healing in rats: A time-dependent study. Cells Tissues Organs 2014, 199, 266–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Partoazar, A.; Kianvash, N.; Darvishi, M.H.; Nasoohi, S.; Rezayat, S.M.; Bahador, A. Ethosomal curcumin promoted wound healing and reduced bacterial flora in second degree burn in rat. Drug Res. 2016, 66, 660–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gonçalves, R.; Mezêncio, J.; Benevides, G.; Matta, S.; Neves, C.; Sarandy, M.; Vilela, E. Effect of gallium-arsenide laser, gallium-aluminum-arsenide laser and healing ointment on cutaneous wound healing in Wistar rats. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2010, 43, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Agren, M.S.; Mertz, P.M.; Franzén, L. A comparative study of three occlusive dressings in the treatment of full-thickness wounds in pigs. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1997, 36, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Altoé, L.S.; Alves, R.S.; Sarandy, M.M.; Morais-Santos, M.; Novaes, R.D.; Gonçalves, R.V. Does antibiotic use accelerate or retard cutaneous repair? A systematic review in animal models. PLoS ONE 2019, 22, e0223511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Dolber, P.C.; Spach, M.S. Conventional and confocal fluorescence microscopy of collagen fibers in the heart. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1993, 41, 465–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Junqueira, L.C.U.; Carneiro, J. Biologia Celular e Molecular, 8th ed.; Guanabara Koogan: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  50. Churukian, C.J.; Schenk, E.A. A toluidine blue method for demonstrating mast cells. J. Histotechnol. 1981, 4, 85–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mandarim-de-Lacerda, C.A. Stereological tools in biomedical research. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2003, 75, 469–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gonçalves, R.V.; Novaes, R.D.; Sarandy, M.M.; Damasceno, E.M.; da Matta, S.L.; de Gouveia, N.M.; Freitas, M.B.; Espindola, F.S. 5α-Dihydrotestosterone enhances wound healing in diabetic rats. Life Sci. 2016, 152, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dieterich, S.; Bieligk, U.; Beulich, K.; Hasenfuss, G.; Prestle, J. Gene expression of antioxidative enzymes in the human heart: Increased expression of catalase in the end-stage failing heart. Circulation 2000, 101, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rosa, D.F.; Sarandy, M.M.; Novaes, R.D.; Freitas, M.B.; Pelúzio, M.D.C.G.; Gonçalves, R.V. High-Fat Diet and Alcohol Intake Promotes Inflammation and Impairs Skin Wound Healing in Wistar Rats. Mediat. Inflamm. 2018, 2018, 4658583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Habig, W.H.; Pabst, M.J.; Jakoby, W.B. Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J. Biol. Chem. 1974, 249, 7130–7139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Novaes, R.D.; Santos, E.C.; Fialho, M.D.C.Q.; Gonçalves, W.G.; Sequetto, P.L.; Talvani, A.; Gonçalves, R.V. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory is more effective than anti-oxidant therapy in counteracting oxidative/nitrosative stress and heart disease in T. cruzi-infected mice. Parasitology 2017, 144, 904–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Levine, R.L.; Garland, D.; Oliver, C.N.; Amici, A.; Climent, I.; Lenz, A.G.; Ahn, B.W.; Shaltiel, S.; Stadtman, E.R. Determination of carbonyl content in oxidatively modified proteins. Methods Enzymol. 1990, 186, 464–478. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  59. Tsikas, D. Analysis of nitrite and nitrate in biological fluids by assays based on the Griess reaction: Appraisal of the Griess reaction in the l-arginine/nitric oxide area of research. J. Chromatogr. B 2007, 851, 51–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Oliveira, J.M.; Losano, N.F.; Condessa, S.S.; de Freitas, R.M.P.; Cardoso, S.A.; Freitas, M.B.; de Oliveira, L.L. Exposure to deltamethrin induces oxidative stress and decreases of energy reserve in tissues of the Neotropical fruit-eating bat Artibeus lituratus . Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 148, 684–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Brassolatti, P.; de Andrade, A.L.M.; Bossini, P.S.; Otterço, A.N.; Parizotto, N.A. Evaluation of the low-level laser therapy application parameters for skin burn treatment in experimental model: A systematic review. Lasers Med. Sci. 2018, 33, 1159–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, M.; Qiu, L.; Hu, W.; Deng, X.; Xu, H.; Cao, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Peng, L.; Johnson, S.; Alexey, L.; et al. Genetically-modified bone mesenchymal stem cells with TGF-β 3 improve wound healing and reduce scar tissue formation in a rabbit model. Exp. Cell Res. 2018, 367, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Silva, K.S.; Santos, E.D.; Benett, C.G.; Laranjeira, L.T.; Eberhardt Neto, E.; Costa, E. Produtividade e desenvolvimento de cultivares de repolho em função de doses de boro. Hortic. Bras. 2012, 30, 520–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ahmed, M.F.; Rao, A.S.; Ahemad, S.R.; Ibrahim, M. Phytochemical studies and antioxidant activities of Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 4, 374–378. [Google Scholar]
  65. Fernández-García, E.; Carvajal-Lérida, I.; Jarén-Galán, M.; Garrido-Fernández, J.; Pérez-Gálvez, A.; Hornero-Méndez, D. Carotenoids bioavailability from foods: From plant pigments to efficient biological activities. Food Res. Int. 2012, 46, 438–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sarandy, M.M.; Novaes, R.D.; da Matta, S.L.P.; Mezencio, J.M.D.S.; da Silva, M.B.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Gonçalves, R.V. Ointment of Brassica oleracea var. capitata matures the extracellular matrix in skin wounds of Wistar rats. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 919342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Park, S.; Arasu, M.V.; Jiang, N.; Choi, S.-H.; Lim, Y.P.; Park, J.-T.; Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Kim, S.-J. Metabolite profiling of phenolics, anthocyanins and flavonols in cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata). Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 60, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Xu, F.; Zheng, Y.; Yang, Z.; Cao, S.; Shao, X.; Wang, H. Domestic cooking methods affect the nutritional quality of red cabbage. Food Chem. 2014, 161, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Senthilkumar, A.; Karuvantevida, N.; Rastrelli, L.; Kurup, S.S.; Cheruth, A.J. Traditional uses, pharmacological efficacy, and phytochemistry of Moringa peregrina (Forssk.) Fiori.—A review. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Wei, M.; Ma, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Men, L.; Yue, K.; Pi, Z.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Z. Urinary metabolomics study on the anti-inflammation effects of flavonoids obtained from Glycyrrhiza. J. Chromatogr. B 2018, 1086, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Valenza, A.; Bonfanti, C.; Pasini, M.E.; Bellosta, P. Anthocyanins function as anti-inflammatory agents in a Drosophila model for adipose tissue macrophage infiltration. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 6413172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mehrabani, D.; Farjam, M.; Geramizadeh, B.; Tanideh, N.; Amini, M.; Panjehshahin, M.R. The healing effect of curcumin on burn wounds in rat. World J. Plast. Surg. 2015, 4, 29–35. [Google Scholar]
  73. Das, U.; Behera, S.S.; Pramanik, K. Ethno-herbal-medico in wound repair: An incisive review. Phyther. Res. 2017, 31, 579–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Kurahashi, T.; Fujii, J. Roles of antioxidative enzymes in wound healing. J. Dev. Biol. 2015, 3, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lai, J.C.-Y.; Lai, H.-Y.; Rao, N.K.; Ng, S.-F. Treatment for diabetic ulcer wounds using a fern tannin optimized hydrogel formulation with antibacterial and antioxidative properties. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 189, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Pringle, N.A.; Koekemoer, T.C.; Holzer, A.; Young, C.; Venables, L.; van de Venter, M. Potential therapeutic benefits of green and fermented rooibos (Aspalathus linearis) in dermal wound healing. Planta Med. 2018, 84, 645–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Lateef, Z.; Stuart, G.; Jones, N.; Mercer, A.; Fleming, S.; Wise, L. The Cutaneous Inflammatory Response to Thermal Burn Injury in a Murine Model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Wulandari, E.; Jusman, S.W.A.; Moenadjat, Y.; Jusuf, A.A.; Sadikin, M. Expressions of collagen I and III in hypoxic keloid tissue. Kobe J. Med. Sci. 2016, 62, E58–E69. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  79. Chen, J.; Gao, K.; Liu, S.; Wang, S.; Elango, J.; Bao, B.; Dong, J.; Liu, N.; Wu, W. Fish collagen surgical compress repairing characteristics on wound healing process in vivo. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Stipcevic, T.; Piljac, J.; Berghe, D.V. Effect of different flavonoids on collagen synthesis in human fibroblasts. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2006, 61, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Faggio, C.; Sureda, A.; Morabito, S.; Sanches-Silva, A.; Mocan, A.; Nabavi, S.M. Flavonoids and platelet aggregation: A brief review. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 807, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Corrêa, F.R.S.; Schanuel, F.S.; Moura-Nunes, N.; Monte-Alto-Costa, A.; Daleprane, J.B. Brazilian red propolis improves cutaneous wound healing suppressing inflammation-associated transcription factor NFκB. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 86, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ayala, A.; Muñoz, M.F.; Argüelles, S. Lipid peroxidation: Production, metabolism, and signaling mechanisms of malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2014, 2014, 360438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Pisoschi, A.; Pop, A. The role of antioxidants in the chemistry of oxidative stress: A review. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 97, 55–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Bollineni, R.C.; Fedorova, M.; Blüher, M.; Hoffmann, R. Carbonylated plasma proteins as potential biomarkers of obesity induced type 2 diabetes mellitus. J. Proteome Res. 2014, 13, 5081–5093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Manoto, S.L.; Maepa, M.J.; Motaung, S.K. Medical ozone therapy as a potential treatment modality for regeneration of damaged articular cartilage in osteoarthritis. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 25, 672–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Türedi, S.; Yuluğ, E.; Alver, A.; Bodur, A.; İnce, İ. A morphological and biochemical evaluation of the effects of quercetin on experimental sciatic nerve damage in rats. Exp. Ther. Med. 2018, 15, 3215–3224. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  88. Iuchi, Y.; Roy, D.; Okada, F.; Kibe, N.; Tsunoda, S.; Suzuki, S.; Takahashi, M.; Yokoyama, H.; Yoshitake, J.; Kondo, S.; et al. Spontaneous skin damage and delayed wound healing in SOD1-deficient mice. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2010, 341, 181–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Sarandy, M.M.; Novaes, R.D.; Xavier, A.A.; Vital, C.E.; Leite, J.P.V.; Melo, F.C.S.A.; Gonçalves, R.V. Hydroethanolic extract of Strychnos pseudoquina accelerates skin wound healing by modulating the oxidative status and microstructural reorganization of scar tissue in experimental type I diabetes. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 9538351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Al-Roujayee, A.S. Naringenin improves the healing process of thermally-induced skin damage in rats. J. Int. Med. Res. 2017, 45, 570–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Bryan, N.S. Functional nitric oxide nutrition to combat cardiovascular disease. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2018, 20, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Magenta, A.; Greco, S.; Capogrossi, M.C.; Gaetano, C.; Martelli, F. Nitric oxide, oxidative stress, and p66Shc interplay in diabetic endothelial dysfunction. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 193095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Pierini, D.; Bryan, N.S. Nitric oxide availability as a marker of oxidative stress. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015, 1208, 63–71. [Google Scholar]
  94. Kim, A.; Lang, T.; Xue, M.; Wijewardana, A.; Jackson, C.; Vandervord, J. The Role of Th-17 Cells and γδ T-Cells in Modulating the Systemic Inflammatory Response to Severe Burn Injury. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Mittal, M.; Siddiqui, M.R.; Tran, K.; Reddy, S.P.; Malik, A.B. Reactive Oxygen Species in inflammation and tissue injury. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2014, 20, 1126–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Cordeiro, J.V.; Jacinto, A. The role of transcription-independent damage signals in the initiation of epithelial wound healing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 14, 249–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Sofo, A.; Scopa, A.; Nuzzaci, M.; Vitti, A. Ascorbate peroxidase and catalase activities and their genetic regulation in plants subjected to drought and salinity stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 161, 1356–13578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Sharma, P.; Jha, A.B.; Dubey, R.S.; Pessarakli, M. Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions. J. Bot. 2012, 2012, 217037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sies, H. Role of metabolic H2O2 generation. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 8735–8741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Proportion of cells (A), blood vessels (B,C), and mast cells (DF) in the scar tissue of rats treated with B. oleracea extract. (E,F): photomicrograph of mast cells after treatment with B. oleracea extract (20%) (toluidine blue, E (20 µm = 40× magnification) and F (10 µm = 100× magnification)). F1, and F2 = scar tissue after four and eight days, respectively. (C,E,F) were obtained in F2 (eight days). SAL: saline solution 0.9%; OV: ointment vehicle; SS: silver sulfadiazine, PB1: B. oleracea extract (10%); and PB2: B. oleracea extract (20%). Arrows show the blood. Data represented as mean ± standard deviation of the mean. a, b, c, d represent the statistical difference between treatments, SAL, OV, SS, and PB1, respectively (p < 0.05) (Student–Newman–Keuls test).
Figure 1. Proportion of cells (A), blood vessels (B,C), and mast cells (DF) in the scar tissue of rats treated with B. oleracea extract. (E,F): photomicrograph of mast cells after treatment with B. oleracea extract (20%) (toluidine blue, E (20 µm = 40× magnification) and F (10 µm = 100× magnification)). F1, and F2 = scar tissue after four and eight days, respectively. (C,E,F) were obtained in F2 (eight days). SAL: saline solution 0.9%; OV: ointment vehicle; SS: silver sulfadiazine, PB1: B. oleracea extract (10%); and PB2: B. oleracea extract (20%). Arrows show the blood. Data represented as mean ± standard deviation of the mean. a, b, c, d represent the statistical difference between treatments, SAL, OV, SS, and PB1, respectively (p < 0.05) (Student–Newman–Keuls test).
Cosmetics 11 00027 g001
Figure 2. Proportion of type I (A) and type III (B) collagen fibers and elastic fibers (C) in the scar tissue of rats treated with B. oleracea extract. F1, and F2 = scar tissue after four and eight days, respectively. (DF): photomicrograph on day 8. (D,E): type I (white arrow) and type III collagen fibers (white star) (20 µm). (F): elastic fibers (black arrow) (50 µm). SAL: saline solution 0.9%; OV: ointment vehicle; SS: silver sulfadiazine 1%; PB1: B. oleracea extract (10%); and PB2: B. oleracea extract (20%). Data represented as mean ± standard deviation of the mean. a, b, c, d represent statistical differences between treatments, SAL, OV, SS, and PB1, respectively (p < 0.05) (Student–Newman–Keuls test).
Figure 2. Proportion of type I (A) and type III (B) collagen fibers and elastic fibers (C) in the scar tissue of rats treated with B. oleracea extract. F1, and F2 = scar tissue after four and eight days, respectively. (DF): photomicrograph on day 8. (D,E): type I (white arrow) and type III collagen fibers (white star) (20 µm). (F): elastic fibers (black arrow) (50 µm). SAL: saline solution 0.9%; OV: ointment vehicle; SS: silver sulfadiazine 1%; PB1: B. oleracea extract (10%); and PB2: B. oleracea extract (20%). Data represented as mean ± standard deviation of the mean. a, b, c, d represent statistical differences between treatments, SAL, OV, SS, and PB1, respectively (p < 0.05) (Student–Newman–Keuls test).
Cosmetics 11 00027 g002
Figure 3. Levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD) (A), catalase (CAT) (B), and glutathione S-transferase (GST) (C) in the scar tissue of rats treated with B. oleracea extract. F1, and F2 = scar tissue after four and eight days, respectively. SAL: saline solution 0.9%; OV: ointment vehicle; SS: silver sulfadiazine 1%; PB1: B. oleracea extract (10%); and PB2: B. oleracea extract (20%). Data represented as mean ± standard deviation of the mean. a, b, c, d represent statistical differences between treatments, SAL, OV, SS, and PB1, respectively (p < 0.05) (Student–Newman–Keuls test).
Figure 3. Levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD) (A), catalase (CAT) (B), and glutathione S-transferase (GST) (C) in the scar tissue of rats treated with B. oleracea extract. F1, and F2 = scar tissue after four and eight days, respectively. SAL: saline solution 0.9%; OV: ointment vehicle; SS: silver sulfadiazine 1%; PB1: B. oleracea extract (10%); and PB2: B. oleracea extract (20%). Data represented as mean ± standard deviation of the mean. a, b, c, d represent statistical differences between treatments, SAL, OV, SS, and PB1, respectively (p < 0.05) (Student–Newman–Keuls test).
Cosmetics 11 00027 g003
Figure 4. Levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) (A), carbonylated proteins (PCN) (B), nitrite and nitrate (NO2/NO3) (C), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (D) in the scar tissue. F1 F2 = scar tissue after four and eight days, respectively. SAL: saline solution 0.9%; OV: ointment vehicle; SS: silver sulfadiazine 1%; PB1: B. oleracea extract (10%); and PB2: B. oleracea extract (20%). Data is represented as the mean ± standard deviation of the mean. a, b describes the statistical difference between treatments, SAL and OV, respectively (p < 0.05) (Student–Newman–Keuls test).
Figure 4. Levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) (A), carbonylated proteins (PCN) (B), nitrite and nitrate (NO2/NO3) (C), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (D) in the scar tissue. F1 F2 = scar tissue after four and eight days, respectively. SAL: saline solution 0.9%; OV: ointment vehicle; SS: silver sulfadiazine 1%; PB1: B. oleracea extract (10%); and PB2: B. oleracea extract (20%). Data is represented as the mean ± standard deviation of the mean. a, b describes the statistical difference between treatments, SAL and OV, respectively (p < 0.05) (Student–Newman–Keuls test).
Cosmetics 11 00027 g004
Table 1. Area (mm2) and rate of wound contraction (RWC) (mm2/day) in animals treated with Brassica oleracea var. capitata extract at different concentrations, after 4 and 8 days.
Table 1. Area (mm2) and rate of wound contraction (RWC) (mm2/day) in animals treated with Brassica oleracea var. capitata extract at different concentrations, after 4 and 8 days.
SALOVSSPB1PB2
F0Area156.6 ± 20.1161.6 ± 29.4141.3 ± 15.7126.9 ± 13.3134.9 ± 13.5
RWC0.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
F1Area153.1 ± 33.4178.4 ± 18.8138.4 ± 32.387.4 ± 19.7 *97.7 ± 22.4 *
RWC10.3 ± 6.93.3 ± 20.62.4 ± 18.431.4 ± 10.827.8 ± 13.3
F2Area142.2 ± 30.0155.4 ± 34.7133.9 ± 50.467.6 ± 20.9 *66.4 ± 21.4 *
RWC15.9 ± 14.310.4 ± 19.828.1 ± 18.047.2 ± 12.251.4 ± 12.5 *
SAL: saline solution 0.9%; OV: ointment vehicle; SS: silver sulfadiazine 1%; PB1: B. oleracea extract (10%); and PB2: B. oleracea extract (20%). F0 = intact tissue and F1, F2 = scar tissue after 4 and 8 days, respectively. Data represented as mean ± standard deviation of the mean. * Statistical difference between treatments, SAL, OV, and SS (Student–Newman–Keuls test).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Miranda, L.L.; Sarandy, M.M.; Altoé, L.S.; Bastos, D.S.S.; Melo, F.C.S.A.; Novaes, R.D.; Esposito, D.A.; Gonçalves, R.V. Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Brassica oleracea Accelerates Third-Degree Burn Healing in Rats. Cosmetics 2024, 11, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics11010027

AMA Style

Miranda LL, Sarandy MM, Altoé LS, Bastos DSS, Melo FCSA, Novaes RD, Esposito DA, Gonçalves RV. Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Brassica oleracea Accelerates Third-Degree Burn Healing in Rats. Cosmetics. 2024; 11(1):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics11010027

Chicago/Turabian Style

Miranda, Lyvia Lopes, Mariáurea Matias Sarandy, Luciana Schulthais Altoé, Daniel Silva Sena Bastos, Fabiana Cristina Silveira Alves Melo, Rômulo Dias Novaes, Debora Araújo Esposito, and Reggiani Vilela Gonçalves. 2024. "Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Brassica oleracea Accelerates Third-Degree Burn Healing in Rats" Cosmetics 11, no. 1: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics11010027

APA Style

Miranda, L. L., Sarandy, M. M., Altoé, L. S., Bastos, D. S. S., Melo, F. C. S. A., Novaes, R. D., Esposito, D. A., & Gonçalves, R. V. (2024). Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Brassica oleracea Accelerates Third-Degree Burn Healing in Rats. Cosmetics, 11(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics11010027

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop