Next Article in Journal
Modified Variable Step-Size Incremental Conductance MPPT Technique for Photovoltaic Systems
Previous Article in Journal
A Hybrid-Driven Optimization Framework for Fixed-Wing UAV Maneuvering Flight Planning
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Low Spur and Low Jitter Quadrature LO-Generator Using CML Inductive Peaking Technique for WLAN Transceiver
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Electronics
Volume 10
Issue 19
10.3390/electronics10192328
electronics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Compact Galvanically Isolated Architectures for Low-Power DC-DC Converters with Data Transmission

by
Egidio Ragonese
1,*,
Alessandro Parisi
2,
Nunzio Spina
2 and
Giuseppe Palmisano
1
1
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica Elettronica e Informatica (DIEEI), University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy
2
STMicroelectronics, 95121 Catania, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2021, 10(19), 2328; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10192328
Submission received: 30 July 2021 / Revised: 16 September 2021 / Accepted: 17 September 2021 / Published: 23 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue RF/Mm-Wave Circuits Design and Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This paper reviews state-of-the-art architectures for galvanically isolated DC-DC converters with data transmission for low-power applications. Such applications do not have stringent requirements, in terms of power efficiency, but ask for very compact, highly integrated implementations. To this aim, architecture simplicity is crucial, especially when data transmission and/or output power regulation are required. Since the bottleneck of galvanically isolated systems is the isolation device (i.e., typically a stacked thick oxide or polyimide transformer), the reduction of the number of isolated links, while preserving both power and data functionalities, is the more effective strategy to increase the level of integration, reduce the form factor, and have a lower cost per channel. Specifically, this review compares the pros and cons of different architectures that address this challenge differently from traditional solutions.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

A galvanically isolated system consists of two isolated domains that exchange data signals across the galvanic barrier (see Figure 1). Full isolation is provided if the power supply of domain 2, VDD2, is provided from the power supply of domain 1, VDD1, by means of a galvanically isolated DC-DC converter [1]. Nowadays, galvanic isolation is highly required in low-power applications (i.e., lower than 100 mW), such as factory automation, process control, building automation, portable instrumentation, etc. An important aim is to avoid ground loops in signal conditioning and data transmission. Other significant examples of low-power isolated systems are multichannel sensor interfaces for industrial and medical devices. A common application is to provide an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) with isolated power, along with low data rate communication [2,3,4], as represented in Figure 2. The supply power on the isolated side is provided by an isolated DC-DC converter, while a digital data isolator performs data transmission from the ADC to the microcontroller unit. Since the power consumption of the ADC is typically about few milliwatts, a low-power DC-DC converter is sufficient, while the specifications for the digital isolator (i.e., data rate, common-mode transient immunity, etc.) manly depend on the custom application. Galvanically isolated DC-DC converters with data transmission are also largely used in isolated gate drivers for motor drive in industrial and automotive applications, typically based on a half-bridge topology for n-type power switches [5]. Gate drivers (GDs) are the interface between the controller and the power stage. They minimize both the conduction loss and switching time of the power switching devices, while avoiding destructive conditions that occur when both devices, M1 and M2, are conducting at the same time. Figure 3 shows a simplified scheme of fully isolated GDs, including both an isolated power converter and data transfer interface for high-side power supply and amplifier driving (GDA and GDB), respectively.
GD applications often require isolated power levels well above 100 mW, consequently high-power transfer efficiency (PCE) is mandatory, which limits the effectiveness of fully integrated solutions [6,7]. It is worth noting that in half-bridge GD applications (Figure 3), the main data transmission (i.e., from controller to GDs) has the same direction of the power transfer, whereas in isolated ADC applications (Figure 2), it has the opposite direction (i.e., from the ADC to MCU). This is an important difference for the definition of the architecture of galvanically isolated DC-DC converters with data transmission. Finally, although not highlighted in Figure 2 and Figure 3, an isolated power converter usually requires an additional isolated data link in the opposite direction of the power link for the output power regulation.
In this scenario, small form factor, multi-channel capability, and low cost per channel drive the next generation of isolated DC-DC converters [8]. This review presents the most promising architectures proposed in the last years for low-power galvanically isolated DC-DC converters with data transmission. Specifically, it describes the most interesting architectures aimed at reducing the number of isolated links and, hence, meeting the demanding request of lower form factor and reduced cost per channel, while preserving both power and data functionalities.
The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 reviews selected architectures for low-power, galvanically isolated DC-DC converters, in comparison with the traditional commercial implementations. Two main applications are discussed, i.e., isolated ADCs and isolated half-bridge GDs. Section 3 summarizes and compares the pros and cons of the described architectures, while Section 4 draws main conclusions, highlighting the most promising research trends.

2. Compact Architectures for Highly Integrated Isolated DC-DC Converters

Highly integrated DC-DC converters are mainly based on isolation transformers that exploit the inductive coupling between stacked metal windings isolated by a dielectric layer of a proper thickness (i.e., silicon dioxide or polyimide) [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Isolation transformers enable power transfer up to several hundreds of milliwatts, with maximum power efficiencies of about 30% [11,14]. The inductive approach is suited to data transmission with high common-mode transient immunity (CMTI) performance [15]. Finally, isolation transformers can be fabricated to withstand isolation ratings from basic to reinforced [16].
Traditional architectures for integrated isolated systems exploit several physical isolated links, each of them requiring a dedicated isolation component. In other words, such architectures include at least four isolation devices (e.g., transformers). Specifically, they include an isolated link for the power transmission (i.e., the isolated power link), an isolated link for the feedback path for power regulation, and at least two isolated data links for bidirectional data communication. Such architectures have been widely adopted for commercial implementations.
A typical example, reported in Figure 4, depicts an isolated DC-DC converter using dedicated transformers for power transfer, control feedback, and bidirectional data channels, respectively [10]. Due to the high complexity, a system-in-package (SiP) approach is often exploited by using stand-alone, post-processed isolation devices, instead of integrated ones [13,17]. Isolation capacitors can be used for both data and control feedback channels in the place of transformers with some advantage, in terms of package size [18]. This architecture is highly flexible and can be used for both applications shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3.
However, for a significant decrease of the overall isolator size and cost, the reduction of the number of isolated links is mandatory, as schematically represented in Figure 5 [19,20,21,22,23]. Research efforts have been addressed to share the same isolation device for more than one functionality (i.e., power, data, and control). Hereinafter, promising architectures are fully discussed, with a special focus on low-power isolated ADC applications, in which the main data transmission is in the opposite direction, with respect to the isolated power transfer one. Section 2.4 is, instead, dedicated to isolated GDs, which have different architectural requirements and, therefore, need different solutions.

2.1. Triple Transformer Architecture for Low-Power Isolated ADC

The traditional architecture in Figure 5a can be simplified by getting rid of the dedicated control link for power regulation. Indeed, the control bit stream can be multiplied along with the data stream (from B to A) on the same physical isolated link. Typically, this is compatible with most DC-DC applications, since the bitrate for power regulation is quite low and, hence, data multiplexing does not significantly degrade the overall performance. Of course, bidirectional communication requires a third dedicated data link (from A to B). Basically, a triple transformer architecture includes a power transformer and two data transformers for bidirectional communication, while multiplexing data, along with the control bits on the same transformer (from B to A).
A triple transformer architecture has been demonstrated in an isolated delta–sigma ADC for shunt-based current sensing in [20]. The isolated ADC was implemented with a SiP approach, by means of polyimide power/data transformers providing 5-kVrms isolation (see Figure 6 for cross-section and the top-view of the isolation power transformer). The block diagram and the die photograph of the isolated ADC with triple transformers are shown in Figure 7a,b, respectively. This solution can be simplified into a double transformer architecture by eliminating a data transformer, only for the applications in which bidirectional communication is not required.

2.2. Double Transformer Architecture for Low-Power Isolated ADC

An effective reduction of the isolated links can be achieved by using a bidirectional, half-duplex data communication. A novel solution has been proposed in [24] and consists of a dedicated isolated link for high-efficiency power transfer and an isolated signal link, used for both output voltage/power regulation and bidirectional half-duplex data communication, as represented in Figure 5d.
The architecture was implemented in [22], according to the block-diagram shown in Figure 8a. The power link is made up of a 350-MHz power oscillator, an isolation transformer, and a power rectifier. The output voltage, VISO, is regulated by a feedback control link, consisting of a low-power 900-MHz oscillator, whose oscillation amplitude changes according to the output power. The oscillation voltage of the RF oscillator is the control variable that drives the power control block to turn the power oscillator on and off. The control link is also exploited for bidirectional half-duplex data communication, by means of amplitude shift keying (ASK) modulation of the RF oscillation signal. The high-speed (HS) data stream from chip B to chip A includes a common-mode transient (CMT) rejection block, in order to improve CMTI. On the other hand, a low-speed (LS) data communication from chip A to chip B is also provided for those applications where configuration data are required to set chip B operation.
The photograph of the isolated converter is reported in Figure 8b. It consists of only two dice, since on-chip thick oxide isolation transformers are used for both power and data/control links. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) cross-section of the adopted thick oxide technology is shown in Figure 9a. This technology enables isolation ratings up to 6 kV. Figure 9b depicts the layout view of the data/control transformer of the converter, which adopts a S-shape coil connection to improve the EM immunity (EMI) of the data link and, therefore, avoid bit error rate degradation due to external magnetic fields.

2.3. Single Transformer Architectures for Low-Power Isolated ADC

The very first single-transformer architecture with data transmission capability (see Figure 5c) was patented in [25]. A fully CMOS implementation was presented in [21]. This system is able to transfer both power and data through the same power transformer. Bidirectional half-duplex data communication is achieved by means of an ASK modulation of the power oscillating signal at the primary and/or secondary windings of the power transformer, using a low modulation index to preserve efficiency. The block-diagram and the micrograph of this single-transformer power transfer system with bidirectional data communication are shown in Figure 10a,b, respectively. The system exploits the same on-chip isolation transformer technology shown in Figure 9a. Unfortunately, this solution can be adopted only when output regulation is not required, since the power control signal is not provided. Moreover, it has a poor CMTI performance, due to primary to secondary winding capacitances, especially when a large power transformer is used for better efficiency.
To overcome both limitations, the alternative single-transformer architecture (Figure 5e) can be used. It is a new patented solution [26], which makes compliant both regulated power and data functionalities on the same isolation transformer link. The architecture was implemented in [23] according to the block-diagram in Figure 11a, while the micrograph is shown in Figure 11b. Although this system is well-suited to a two-chip SiP, by using thick oxide isolation, an isolation approach based on a stand-alone polyimide transformer was used. The SEM cross-section and the layout of the adopted polyimide-based transformer are shown in Figure 12a,b. Differently from the widely adopted on/off control scheme, the dc output power is regulated by means of a continuous-time feedback loop. In this way, the power oscillator is always on, thus enabling the power signal modulation for data communication and feedback control. The control data are multiplexed together with the bitstream of N data channels and then transmitted across the galvanic barrier (from B to A) by means of an ASK modulation of the power signal.
On side A, a receiver with a demultiplexer recovers data, control, and clock signals. The recovered data bitstream is allocated on the output data channels, whereas the low-frequency control signal performs a continuous-time power oscillator regulation. This last architecture is well-suited for sensor applications, since CMTI and power conversion efficiency performance must be properly traded off, due to the use of a single isolation transformer. The proposed DC-DC converter architecture is also compatible with bidirectional half-duplex communication with data rates of at least 5 Mbit/s from chip A to chip B, as in [21,22]. It is worth mentioning that, during chip A to chip B communication the power control is disabled (i.e., data transfer from chip B to chip A is not possible at the same time), but no effect on the isolated supply voltage, VISO, occurs (being the time constant of the load in the order of milliseconds).

2.4. Compact Architectures for Isolated Half-Bridge GDs

As already said in Section 1, isolated half-bridge GD applications are hardly compliant with a fully integrated approach, due to excessively high levels of isolated power (well above 100 mW) and inadequate PCE performance of standard micro-transformer technologies [13,27]. Indeed, typical PCE values for a traditional isolation process (i.e., without magnetic materials) are around 30% [6,7,11,28], with a record of 34% [14,29]. On the other hand, the adoption of magnetic materials [30,31] or glass-based fan-out wafer-level packaging [32] demonstrated enabling a PCE of about 50%, at the expense of higher complexity and fabrication costs. Specifically, only data transfer functionalities (i.e., without isolated power transfer) are usually implemented with an integrated approach, either adopting transformer-based [33] and capacitive isolation devices [34] or a package-scale isolation barrier with RF planar coupling [35,36,37]. On the other hand, high-power, high-efficiency isolated DC-DC conversion is still implemented by means of an off-chip, discrete transformer. For these reasons, very few innovative solutions have been proposed for isolated half-bridge GD applications. With reference to Figure 3, as isolated half-bridge GD (high-side) requires the following isolated links:
  • Power link for GD/diagnostic circuit power supply (left to right);
  • Data link for power regulation (right to left);
  • Data link for GD PWM (left to right);
  • Data link for configuration (left to right);
  • Data link for monitoring (right to left).
An isolated PWM GD with auxiliary energy and bidirectional FM/AM signal transmission via single transformer has been presented in [38]. Compared to [21], it allows bidirectional communication by exploiting FM/AM transmission in the place of AM/AM one. However, both isolated (auxiliary) power and data rates are lower than in [20]; specifically, the data rate for PWM is too low (only 1 Mbit/s) for GD application, thus making this architecture more suited to isolated ADCs.
A new architecture has been proposed in [39]. The work exploits a dual-frequency shift keying (FSK) modulation without an external reference clock to implement two independent data links (i.e., up to 21 Mbit/s and 500 kbit/s for the GD PWM and configuration data, respectively), along with a low-power link (i.e., 123 mW with 23% PCE only for diagnostic circuit power supply) on the same isolation stacked transformer, fabricated on a flexible PCB with 25-μm copper layers and 100-μm isolator. A third isolated data link is also implemented for monitoring, with a maximum data rate of 14 Mbit/s, by using another isolation PCB transformer (adopting a concentric configuration with the first transformer to save space). Despite the low integration level, due to the PCB isolation transformers, the architecture is very interesting for reducing the number of physical isolated channels.
Another compact architecture for isolated GDs has been patented in [40]. The proposed solution takes advantage of two synchronized coupled oscillators [41] to transmit isolated power and data on the same transformer link, while being compliant with power regulation, according to the simplified schematic in Figure 13. Specifically, the first oscillator, OSC 1, is used for simultaneous data transmission (at low bit rate) and constant power transfer, while the second synchronized oscillator, OSC 2, is used for variable power transfer (to guarantee output power regulation, thanks to PWM-controlled turn-off circuitry). Half-duplex bidirectional communication is implemented by means of backscattering at the secondary coil of the isolation transformer and can be used for output power control.

3. Architecture Comparison for Low-Power Isolated ADC

The performance of the analyzed DC-DC architectures for low-power isolated ADC is compared in Table 1. Several considerations arise from this comparison. The commercial architectures, such as [19], are developed for maximum flexibility to allow an easy use in all applicative environments. This is accomplished by means of dedicated isolated links for power, control, and bidirectional data, at the cost of lower-level integration and higher costs. High isolated power and conversion efficiency are achieved, thanks to a customized power transformer and pulse-width modulation (PWM) control scheme, while bidirectional high data rate communication is provided. It is worth mentioning that isolation rating and CMTI performance are highly related to the isolation technology.
On the other hand, more compact solutions [20] can be used in customized applications with an acceptable reduction of flexibility or performance. The key point is sharing functionalities on the same isolation physical channel. Two main strategies are exploited, i.e., data multiplexing and ASK modulation of a RF carrier. Data multiplexing can be used to share the isolation transformer for data and control bits, as in [20], by using a simple bang–bang control scheme to minimize the required bitrate. ASK modulation can be exploited either on the control channel to implement half-duplex communication, as in [22], or on the power channel in the unregulated converter of [21]. Moreover, both techniques (i.e., ctrl/data multiplexing and ASK modulation) can be combined in the single-transformer architecture of [23], provided that a continuous-time control scheme is adopted in the place of a PWM one. Of course, such simplifications limit both output power and efficiency performance, especially in single-transformer architectures, where a design tradeoff must be done for the isolation component. However, the benefits, in terms of level of integration, form factor, and lower cost per channel are significant with a reduction of chip number and area consuming isolation devices (see last two rows of Table 1).

4. Conclusions

In this review, the most promising research trends for galvanically isolated DC-DC converters have been discussed, with the aim of providing the reader with alterative architectures for highly integrated compact implementations. The reduction of the number of isolated links, while preserving both power and data functionalities, is crucial. The evaluation of the most suited architecture must be done according to the specific application requirements (i.e., isolated output power, data rate, power regulation, half/full duplex, and CMTI). To this aim, Table 2 can drive the designer into this evaluation phase, guaranteeing an aware choice.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.R.; validation, E.R., A.P., and N.S.; formal analysis, E.R.; investigation, E.R., A.P., N.S., and A.P.; project administration, G.P.; supervision, E.R.; writing—original draft, E.R.; writing—review and editing, E.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thanks the Ph.D students that have been involved in the topic of galvanically isolated systems within the Radio Frequency Advanced Design Center, which is a joint research center of the University of Catania, DIEEI, and STMicroelectronics, Catania [42,43,44,45].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ragonese, E.; Parisi, A.; Spina, N.; Palmisano, G. Fully integrated galvanically isolated dc-dc converters based on inductive coupling. In Applications in Electronics Pervading Industry, Environment and Society ApplePies 2018 Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 550, pp. 335–341. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ziegler, S.; Woodward, R.C.; Iu, H.H.-C.; Borle, L.J. Current sensing techniques: A review. IEEE Sens. J. 2009, 9, 354–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tan, Z.; Mueck, M.; Du, X.H.; Getzin, L.; Guidry, M.; Zhao, F.; Chen, B. A fully isolated delta-sigma ADC for shunt based current sensing. In Proceedings of the IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference (A-SSCC), Xiamen, China, 9–11 November 2015; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ma, S.; Feng, J.; Zhao, T.; Chen, B. A Fully isolated amplifier based on charge-balanced SAR converters. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. I Regul. Pap. 2018, 65, 1795–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schnell, R. Powering the Isolated Side of Your Half-Bridge Configuration. Analog Devices. Available online: http://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/technicalarticles/Powering-the-Isolated-Side-of-Your-Half-Bridge-ConfigurationMS-2663-1.pdf (accessed on 20 August 2021).
  6. Chen, B. Isolated half-bridge gate driver with integrated high-side supply. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Rhodes, Greece, 15–19 June 2008; pp. 3615–3618. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ma, S.; Zhao, T.; Chen, B. 4A isolated half-bridge gate driver with 4.5V to 18V output drive voltage. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, Fort Worth, TX, USA, 16–20 March 2014; pp. 1490–1493. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, B. Compact and reliable isolated DC/DC and sic gate driver for automotive application. In Proceedings of the International Exhibition and Conference for Power Electronics, Intelligent Motion, Renewable Energy and Energy Management, PCIM Asia, Shanghai, China, 16–18 November 2020; pp. 335–337. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, B. High Frequency Power Converter Based on Transformers. U.S. Patent 7983059B2, 19 July 2011. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, B. Fully integrated isolated dc-dc converter using microtransformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, Austin, TX, USA, 24–28 February 2008; pp. 335–338. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fiore, V.; Ragonese, E.; Palmisano, G. A fully-integrated watt-level power transfer system with on-chip galvanic isolation in silicon technology. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2017, 32, 1984–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Greco, N.; Parisi, A.; Lombardo, P.; Spina, N.; Ragonese, E.; Palmisano, G. A double-isolated DC-DC converter based on integrated LC resonant barriers. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 2018, 65, 4423–4433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ragonese, E.; Spina, N.; Parisi, A.; Palmisano, G. An experimental comparison of galvanically isolated DC-DC converters: Isolation technology and integration approach. Electronics 2021, 10, 1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Qin, W.; Yang, X.; Ma, S.; Liu, F.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, T.; Chen, B. An 800 mW fully integrated galvanic isolated power transfer system meeting CISPR 22 Class-B emission levels with 6 dB margin. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 17–21 February 2019; pp. 246–248. [Google Scholar]
  15. Yun, R.; Sun, J.; Gaalaas, E.; Chen, B. A transformer-based digital isolator with 20kVPK surge capability and >200kV/µS common mode transient immunity. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits, Honolulu, HI, USA, 5–17 June 2016; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  16. Devices-Magnetic, D.V.S. DIN VDE Semiconductor Devices-Magnetic and Capacitive Coupler for Basic and Reinforced Isolation; VDE Verlag VDE V 0884-11: Berlin, Germany, 1 January 2017. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ragonese, E.; Palmisano, G.; Parisi, A.; Spina, N. Highly integrated galvanically isolated systems for data/power transfer. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (ICECS), Genoa, Italy, 27–29 November 2019; pp. 518–521. [Google Scholar]
  18. Texas Instruments. ISOW7741 5000-VRMS Reinforced Quad-Channel Digital Isolator with Integrated Low Emissions, Low-Noise DC-DC Converter. Available online: https://www.ti.com/product/ISOW7741 (accessed on 4 July 2021).
  19. Analog Devices. ADuM6201–Dual-Channel, 5 kV Isolators with integrated DC-to-DC Converter. Available online: https://www.analog.com/en/products/adum6201.html (accessed on 4 July 2021).
  20. Tan, Z.; Mueck, M.; Du, X.H.; Getzin, L.; Guidry, M.; Keating, S.; Xing, X.; Zhao, F.; Chen, B. A fully isolated delta-sigma ADC for shunt based current sensing. IEEE J. Solid-State Circ. 2016, 51, 2232–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lombardo, P.; Fiore, V.; Ragonese, E.; Palmisano, G. A fully-integrated half-duplex data/power transfer system with up to 40Mbps data rate, 23mW output power and on-chip 5kV galvanic isolation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 31 January–4 February 2016; pp. 300–301. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ragonese, E.; Spina, N.; Castorina, A.; Lombardo, P.; Greco, N.; Parisi, A.; Palmisano, G. A fully integrated galvanically isolated DC-DC converter with data communication. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. I Regul. Pap. 2018, 65, 1432–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Parisi, A.; Ragonese, E.; Spina, N.; Palmisano, G. Galvanically isolated DC-DC converter using a single isolation transformer for multi-channel communication. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. I Regul. Pap. 2020, 67, 4434–4444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ragonese, E.; Spina, N.; Lombardo, P.; Greco, N.; Parisi, A.; Palmisano, G. Galvanically Isolated DC-DC Converter with Bidirectional Data Transmission. U.S. Patent 9948193B2, 17 April 2018. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ragonese, E.; Fiore, V.; Spina, N.; Lombardo, P.; Palmisano, G. Power Oscillator Apparatus with Transformer-Based Power Combining for Galvanically Isolated Bidirectional Data Communication and Power Transfer. U.S. Patent 9306614B2, 5 April 2016. [Google Scholar]
  26. Parisi, A.; Greco, N.; Spina, N.; Ragonese, E.; Palmisano, G. A Galvanically Isolated dc-dc Circuit Converter, with Data Communication, Corresponding System and Corresponding Method. U.S. Patent 10637360B2, 28 April 2020. [Google Scholar]
  27. Greco, N.; Parisi, A.; Spina, N.; Ragonese, E.; Palmisano, G. Scalable lumped models of integrated transformers for galvanically isolated power transfer systems. Integration 2018, 63, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Greco, N.; Spina, N.; Fiore, V.; Ragonese, E.; Palmisano, G. A galvanically isolated dc-dc converter based on current-reuse hybrid-coupled oscillators. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. II Express Brief 2017, 64, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, L.; Fang, X.; Wu, R. An 11MHz fully integrated 5kV isolated DC-DC converter without cross-isolation-barrier feedback. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 16–20 February 2020; pp. 292–294. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tianting, Z.; Yue, Z.; Baoxing, C. An isolated DC-DC converter with fully integrated magnetic core transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC), Austin, TX, USA, 30 April–3 May 2017; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhuo, Y.; Ma, S.; Zhao, T.; Qin, W.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, Y.; Yan, H.; Chen, B. A 52% peak efficiency >1-W isolated power transfer system using fully integrated transformer with magnetic core. IEEE J. Solid State Circ. 2019, 54, 3326–3335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pan, D.; Li, G.; Miao, F.; Deng, B.; Wei, J.; Yu, D.; Liu, M.; Cheng, L. A 1.25W 46.5%-Peak-Efficiency Transformer-in-Package Isolated DC-DC Converter Using Glass-Based Fan-Out Wafer-Level Packaging Achieving 50 mW/mm2 Power Density. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13–22 February 2021; pp. 468–470. [Google Scholar]
  33. Analog Devices. ADuM4221– Isolated, Half Bridge Gate Driver with Adjustable Dead Time, Dual Input, 4 A Output. Available online: https://www.analog.com/en/products/adum4221.html#product-overview (accessed on 26 August 2021).
  34. TI. Isolated Gate Drivers. Available online: https://www.ti.com/power-management/gate-drivers/isolated-gate-drivers/overview.html (accessed on 29 August 2021).
  35. Mukherjee, S.; Bhat, A.N.; Shrivastava, K.A.; Bonu, M.; Sutton, B.; Gopinathan, V.; Thiagarajan, G.; Patki, A.; Malakar, J.; Krishnapura, N. A 500 Mb/s 200pJ/b die-to-die bidirectional link with 24 kV surge isolation and 50 kV/µs CMR using resonant inductive coupling in 0.18 µm CMOS. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 5–9 February 2017; pp. 434–435. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ragonese, E.; Parisi, A.; Spina, N.; Palmisano, G. Reinforced galvanic isolation: Integrated approaches to go beyond. In Applications in Electronics Pervading Industry, Environment and Society ApplePies 2019 Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 627, pp. 277–283. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ragonese, E.; Spina, N.; Parisi, A.; Palmisano, G. A CMOS Data Transfer System Based on Planar RF Coupling for Reinforced Galvanic Isolation with 25-kV Surge Voltage and 250-kV/µs CMTI. Electronics 2020, 9, 943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Seidel, A.; Costa, M.; Joos, J.; Wicht, B. Isolated 100% PWM gate driver with auxiliary energy and bidirectional FM/AM signal transmission via single transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Charlotte, NC, USA, 15–19 March 2015; pp. 2581–2584. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ishihara, H.; Onizuka, K. A Fully-Generic-Process Galvanic Isolator for Gate Driver with 123 mW 23% power transfer and full-triplex 21/14/0.5 Mb/s bidirectional communication utilizing reference-free dual-modulation FSK. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 16–20 February 2020; pp. 300–302. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ragonese, E.; Greco, N.; Palmisano, G. A Method of Transmitting Power and Data across a Galvanic Isolation Barrier, Corresponding System and Apparatus. U.S. Patent 10298408B2, 21 May 2019. [Google Scholar]
  41. Spina, N.; Fiore, V.; Lombardo, P.; Ragonese, E.; Palmisano, G. Current-reuse transformer coupled oscillators with output power combining for galvanically isolated power transfer systems. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. I Regul. Pap. 2015, 62, 2940–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fiore, V. Fully Integrated Systems with on-chip Galvanic Isolation in Silicon Technology. Ph.D. Thesis, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy, 19 December 2015. [Google Scholar]
  43. Lombardo, P. Fully Integrated Data and Power Transfer Systems with Galvanic Isolation. Ph.D. Thesis, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy, February 2017. [Google Scholar]
  44. Greco, A. Fully Integrated DC-DC Converters with Basic and Double Galvanic Isolation. Ph.D. Thesis, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy, 12 January 2018. [Google Scholar]
  45. Parisi, A. Compact Architectures for DC-DC Converters with Galvanic Isolation. Ph.D. Thesis, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy, 7 January 2019. [Google Scholar]
Electronics 10 02328 g001 550
Figure 1. Simplified block-diagram of a galvanically isolated system. Reproduced from [1]. Copyright 2019, Springer Nature Customer Service Centre GmbH.
Figure 1. Simplified block-diagram of a galvanically isolated system. Reproduced from [1]. Copyright 2019, Springer Nature Customer Service Centre GmbH.
Electronics 10 02328 g001
Electronics 10 02328 g002 550
Figure 2. Simplified scheme of an isolated ADC for a sensor interface.
Figure 2. Simplified scheme of an isolated ADC for a sensor interface.
Electronics 10 02328 g002
Electronics 10 02328 g003 550
Figure 3. Simplified scheme of an isolated gate driver application for half-bridge configuration.
Figure 3. Simplified scheme of an isolated gate driver application for half-bridge configuration.
Electronics 10 02328 g003
Electronics 10 02328 g004 550
Figure 4. Die photograph of an isolated DC-DC converter with data links. Reproduced from [10]. Copyright 2008, IEEE.
Figure 4. Die photograph of an isolated DC-DC converter with data links. Reproduced from [10]. Copyright 2008, IEEE.
Electronics 10 02328 g004
Electronics 10 02328 g005 550
Figure 5. Architectures for galvanically isolated power/data transfer systems: (a) Traditional [19]. (b) In [20]. (c) In [21]. (d) In [22]. (e) In [23]. Reproduced from [17]. Copyright 2019, IEEE.
Figure 5. Architectures for galvanically isolated power/data transfer systems: (a) Traditional [19]. (b) In [20]. (c) In [21]. (d) In [22]. (e) In [23]. Reproduced from [17]. Copyright 2019, IEEE.
Electronics 10 02328 g005
Electronics 10 02328 g006 550
Figure 6. Isolation polyimide transformer. (a) Cross-section. (b) Top-view. (c) Three-dimensional view. Reproduced from [20]. Copyright 2016, IEEE.
Figure 6. Isolation polyimide transformer. (a) Cross-section. (b) Top-view. (c) Three-dimensional view. Reproduced from [20]. Copyright 2016, IEEE.
Electronics 10 02328 g006
Electronics 10 02328 g007 550
Figure 7. Isolated delta–sigma ADC (a) Block diagram. (b) Micrograph. Reproduced from [20]. Copyright 2016, IEEE.
Figure 7. Isolated delta–sigma ADC (a) Block diagram. (b) Micrograph. Reproduced from [20]. Copyright 2016, IEEE.
Electronics 10 02328 g007
Electronics 10 02328 g008 550
Figure 8. DC-DC converter with bidirectional data communication (a) Block diagram. (b) Micrograph. Reproduced from [22]. Copyright 2018, IEEE.
Figure 8. DC-DC converter with bidirectional data communication (a) Block diagram. (b) Micrograph. Reproduced from [22]. Copyright 2018, IEEE.
Electronics 10 02328 g008
Electronics 10 02328 g009 550
Figure 9. Isolation thick oxide transformer. (a) SEM cross-section. (b) Layout view of the data/control transformer with S-shape. Reproduced from [22]. Copyright 2018, IEEE.
Figure 9. Isolation thick oxide transformer. (a) SEM cross-section. (b) Layout view of the data/control transformer with S-shape. Reproduced from [22]. Copyright 2018, IEEE.
Electronics 10 02328 g009
Electronics 10 02328 g010 550
Figure 10. Single-transformer DC-DC converter with bidirectional data communication (a) Block diagram. (b) Micrograph. Reproduced from [21]. Copyright 2016, IEEE.
Figure 10. Single-transformer DC-DC converter with bidirectional data communication (a) Block diagram. (b) Micrograph. Reproduced from [21]. Copyright 2016, IEEE.
Electronics 10 02328 g010
Electronics 10 02328 g011 550
Figure 11. Single-transformer DC-DC converter with bidirectional data communication and power regulation. (a) Block diagram. (b) Micrograph. Reproduced from [23]. Copyright 2020, IEEE.
Figure 11. Single-transformer DC-DC converter with bidirectional data communication and power regulation. (a) Block diagram. (b) Micrograph. Reproduced from [23]. Copyright 2020, IEEE.
Electronics 10 02328 g011
Electronics 10 02328 g012 550
Figure 12. Isolation polyimide transformer (a) SEM cross-section (b) Layout view. Reproduced from [23]. Copyright 2020, IEEE.
Figure 12. Isolation polyimide transformer (a) SEM cross-section (b) Layout view. Reproduced from [23]. Copyright 2020, IEEE.
Electronics 10 02328 g012
Electronics 10 02328 g013 550
Figure 13. Simplified schematic of compact architecture for isolated GDs based on synchronized coupled oscillators.
Figure 13. Simplified schematic of compact architecture for isolated GDs based on synchronized coupled oscillators.
Electronics 10 02328 g013
Table
Table 1. Performance comparison of DC-DC converter architectures for low-power isolated ADC.
Table 1. Performance comparison of DC-DC converter architectures for low-power isolated ADC.
Parameters[19][20][21][22][23]
Supply voltage [V]3.33.333.35 (1)/1.8
Isolated output voltage [V]3.33.32 (2)3.33.3
Max. output power [mW]1169.120.49350
Power efficiency [%]202291914
Oscillation frequency [MHz]180200330350300
Control scheme/frequency [kHz]PWM/625Bang-bang/1700n.a. (2)PWM/100Continuous-time
Data carrier frequency [MHz]n.a. (3)n.a. (3)330850300
No. of data/configuration channels2/03 (4)/11/1 (5)1/1 (5)3 (4)/0
Max channel data rate [Mb/s]25 (×2)1.7 (×3)405010 (×3)
Maximum isolation levelBasicReinforcedBasicBasicReinforced
CMTI [kV/μs]35n.a.n.a.5050
Silicon technologyHV-CMOS
Schottky diode		0.25-μm CMOS
0.35-μm DMOS
Schottky diode		0.35-μm BCD0.18-μm BCD
0.13-μm CMOS
Schottky diode
Isolation technologyPost–processed polyimide
transformer with Au metals		Integrated
SiO2 transformer
with Cu/Al metals		Post–processed
polyimide transformer
with Au metals
No. of transformers4
(1 power, 1 ctr, 2 data)		3
(1 power, 2 data/ctrl)		12
(1 power, 1 data/ctrl)		1
No. of dice46223
(1) Power oscillator supply voltage; (2) output voltage is not controlled; (3) pulse modulation; (4) 3 multiplexed data channels; (5) half-duplex.
Table
Table 2. Galvanically isolated DC-DC converter with data communication for low-power ADC: architecture selection.
Table 2. Galvanically isolated DC-DC converter with data communication for low-power ADC: architecture selection.
ArchiteturePower LinkData CommunicationIsolated Power RegulationData RateCMTI
Triple-transformerDedicatedFull duplexYES
(e.g., Bang-bang)		MediumMainly limited by the isolation technology
Double-transformerDedicatedHalf-duplexYES
(PWM)		Medium/highMainly limited by the isolation technology
Single-transformerShared with dataHalf-duplexNOMedium/highTradeoff with power efficieny conversion
Single-transformer with ouput power regulationShared with data/ctrHalf-duplexYES
(continuous-time)		MediumTradeoff with power efficieny conversion
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ragonese, E.; Parisi, A.; Spina, N.; Palmisano, G. Compact Galvanically Isolated Architectures for Low-Power DC-DC Converters with Data Transmission. Electronics 2021, 10, 2328. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10192328

AMA Style

Ragonese E, Parisi A, Spina N, Palmisano G. Compact Galvanically Isolated Architectures for Low-Power DC-DC Converters with Data Transmission. Electronics. 2021; 10(19):2328. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10192328

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ragonese, Egidio, Alessandro Parisi, Nunzio Spina, and Giuseppe Palmisano. 2021. "Compact Galvanically Isolated Architectures for Low-Power DC-DC Converters with Data Transmission" Electronics 10, no. 19: 2328. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10192328

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop