Study and Optimization of Transmission Characteristics of the Magnetically Coupled Resonant Wireless Transmission System

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1. The main findings from this work should be added at the end of the abstract. 

2. Please proofread your article before submitting the revised version. (Ex: CO2, 2 should be subscript). Many typos and grammatical errors should be corrected before submitting the revised article.

3. Kindly avoid the usage of some words like "we" "our". Prepare the technical article in a passive voice structure.    4. How the table 1 parameters are obtained?   5. Why the k value is considered as 0.35?    6. Is it possible to show the effect of power transfer and its efficiency by changing the k value?    7. Line number 494: f= 0.33447, k=80kHz. I believe that it is a typo error. Please check it.   8. Why Grey wolf optimization has been selected for this work?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors propose an optimization of magnetically linked resonant wireless transmission system transmission properties. However, in the Literature Review, the authors do not go into enough detail on why this technique was chosen above others. This issue should be addressed more comprehensively in the study. Although these difficulties are mathematically elaborated, they should also be narratively elaborated in the abstract, introduction, literature review, and conclusion of the study. There is no need to include a lot of material, but a few phrases to clarify the strategy are required.

To show why their proposed method is realistic, the authors adopt a scenario approach. If there was a sub-chapter that elaborated on the scenario design in terms of scenario planning and why the specific situations were chosen, the paper would be easier to follow.

The finale seems to be a little too brief. Please pay special attention to "Discussion, Implication, and Conclusion" in the final section that should adress the following issues:

(1).     Summary of the research - what was the goal, and how it was attained

(2).     Discussion of why the authors found these results and how they comply (or not) with the Literature Review?

(3).     Managerial Implications

(4).     Limitations of the paper

 

(5).     Future Studies and Recommendations

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for your revised version. The article can be accepted for publication.