Next Article in Journal
Recent Advancements in Indoor Positioning and Localization
Previous Article in Journal
Asynchronous and Decoupled HIL Simulation of a DC Nanogrid
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Research on Simulation Design of MOS Driver for Micro-LED

1
Department of Microelectronic, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
2
Key Laboratory of Advanced Display and System Application, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
3
School of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2022, 11(13), 2044; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11132044
Submission received: 15 May 2022 / Revised: 23 June 2022 / Accepted: 27 June 2022 / Published: 29 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Microelectronics)

Abstract

:
Micro-LED is a new technology applied in the display field, which has the advantages of self-illumination, low power consumption, high brightness, long life and ultra-high resolution, and has broad application prospects. Using MOS devices to drive micro-LED can enable each unit to have its own drive, thus improving the yield and reducing the subsequent repair processes. In this paper, Sentaurus TCAD simulation software is used to design and simulate NMOS/PMOS devices and their driving circuits. For the first time, CMOS inverters are used to directly drive Micro-LED. Three kinds of driving circuits are compared and analyzed according to their simulation results in output characteristics and transient characteristics. In terms of switching characteristics caused by output characteristics, a CMOS inverter driving a micro-LED circuit has no problems of incomplete turn-off and has greater advantages. In the switching characteristics aspect caused by transient characteristics, PMOS driving a micro-LED circuit has the shortest turn-on time and greater advantages. When compared with a micro-LED driven by an access current-limiting resistor, a micro-LED driven by a direct drive has a smaller on-time value and greater advantages.

1. Introduction

The micro light emitting diode (Micro-LED) refers to a high-density, integrated LED array [1]. A micro-LED display uses inorganic LED devices as light-emitting pixels to realize an active light-emitting matrix display, which surpasses the current mainstream liquid crystal (LCD) and organic light-emitting diode (OLED) displays, in terms of power consumption, resolution, contrast and life, and represents significant progress in the area of display fields [2,3,4]. The performance parameters of related devices are shown in Table 1. The size of a micro-LED is reduced to the micron level (generally less than 50 μm) [5], which can realize the control of each pixel and a single-point light drive, and the single pixel produces high brightness [6]. The application prospects are very broad, and they are widely used in virtual reality displays, neuron stimulation, optical wireless communication and other fields [7,8,9]. However, the application of micro-LED still faces some challenges, such as: small size effect; chip and backplane technology; mass transfer technology; full-color technology; bonding and driving technology; defect and yield technology; inspection and maintenance technology; etc. [10,11,12,13,14]. Driving technology is also one of these challenges [15].
A metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) is the basic unit of MOS and digital CMOS integrated circuits. It is a field effect transistor that can be widely used in analog circuits and digital circuits. The basic structure of an N-channel polysilicon gate MOS transistor is shown in Figure 1.
A complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) inverter represents the basic module of a CMOS digital integrated circuit based on a CMOS inverter [16]. The size of CMOS devices can be easily reduced—analog and digital circuits can be placed on the same chip—and the manufacturing cost of CMOS circuits is low [17]. Under the condition of the same geometric size and absolute value of working voltage, the NMOS transistor has a large transconductance and small on resistance, but the NMOS transistor also has many disadvantages, such as a large volume, complex circuit structures and high costs [18]. The PMOS transistor has a high threshold voltage and strong anti-interference abilities, but its on-resistance is relatively large, load current is large, and heating is significant [19]. In 2011, the Shin team conducted research on an NMOS direct driving Micro-LED. They used gold bump bonding and anisotropic conductive adhesive to flip-chip connect an NMOS silicon driving circuit and micro-LED array. The micro-LED array had 8 × 8 pixels and each pixel size was 30 μm × 30 μm [20]. In the same year, McGovern’s team conducted research on PMOS direct driving micro-LEDs. They used a PMOS driver with a pixel size of 150 μm × 150 μm and a resolution of 64 × 64 to drive gan-based micro-LEDs with a diameter of 25 μm [21]. However, up to now, there is no research on directly driving a micro-LED with a CMOS inverter [22,23,24,25,26].
Therefore, the circuit design of Micro-LEDs driven by CMOS inverters is proposed for the first time in this paper. By designing the structures of NMOS and PMOS devices and defining related parameters, and comparing the three driving modes of NMOS, PMOS and CMOS inverters to drive individual Micro-LEDs by TCAD simulation, the best driving circuit was determined according to the current characteristics of the transient characteristic curve of the simulation results, which lays a foundation for the design of an array micro-LED driving circuit.

2. Simulation Parameters and Model Settings

In this paper, based on the SWB environment of Sentaurus software, the design and application of the TCAD simulation project is organized and implemented, and the TCAD project is realized in parametric form. Through simulation and analysis of the characteristics of the 0.18 μm process MOS transistor, the NMOS transistor and PMOS transistor which meet the requirements of this experiment, were designed, and the CMOS inverter was designed and built. The circuit of the CMOS inverter driving the micro-LED directly is proposed for the first time. By comparing the simulation performance of the NMOS, PMOS and CMOS inverters driving the Micro-LED, the best driving circuit was determined, which laid the foundation for driving an array Micro-LED.
Circuit symbols of an N-channel and P-channel enhancement MOSFET are shown in Figure 2. In this experiment, nMOSFETs are used as the lower tubes and pMOSFETs as the upper tubes; as shown in Figure 2a,b.
The variation trend of the width-length ratio of PMOS and NMOS under different process conditions are shown in Figure 3, and also the width-length ratio W/L = 2.25 under 0.18 μm process conditions. The gate length L is 0.18 μm, which makes the NMOS device width WN = 2.0 μm and PMOS device width WP = 4.5 μm. The thickness (tox) of the oxide layer was selected to be 16 Å.
The gate-source voltage VGS used to generate the surface inversion layer (to generate the conduction channel) is called the threshold voltage VT0. The threshold voltage formula is:
V T = V T 0 + γ V S B 2 ϕ F 2 ϕ F
where VT0 is the threshold voltage at zero substrate bias; γ is the substrate bias coefficient; VSB is the substrate bias voltage; ϕF is the Fermi potential of the substrate.
V T 0 = Φ G C 2 ϕ F Q B 0 C O X Q O X C O X
γ = 2 q N A ε si C O X
Fermi potential formula of n-type semiconductor substrate:
ϕ F ( s u b s t r a t e ) = k T q ln n i N A
In which k is the Boltzmann constant; q is the unit (electron) charge; T is the temperature (T = 300 K at room temperature); ni is a function of temperature T (ni = 1.45 × 1010 cm−3 at room temperature); NA is the substrate doping concentration.
The work function difference formula between the gate and the channel is:
Φ G C = ϕ F ( s u b s t r a t e ) ϕ F ( g a t e )
Charge density formula of the depletion region:
Q B 0 = 2 q N A ε s i 2 ϕ F ( s u b s t r a t e ) + V S B
where εsi is the dielectric constant of silicon; VSB is the substrate voltage.
The charge formula of oxidation interface is:
Q O X = q N O X
where NOX is the interface of the oxide layer, there is charge density, and NOX = 2 × 1010 cm−2.
The gate oxidation capacitance COX per unit area can be obtained by the dielectric constant εOX and the oxidation thickness tOX of the silicon oxide layer, and the formula is:
C O X = ε O X t O X
According to the experience of MOSFETs design, a voltage of 0.18 μm process MOSFETs is about 0.5 V, and under the same process conditions, the substrate doping concentration of pMOSFETs is larger than that of nMOSFETs, so the absolute value of the threshold voltage of pMOSFETs is larger than that of nMOSFETs. Therefore, the threshold voltage of the NMOS transistor and PMOS transistor used in this paper is about 0.45 V and −0.5 V respectively. The oxide thickness tOX of the MOSFETs is set to 16 Å, and the substrate bias is the same as the source potential, that is, VSB = 0. Combined with formula (1–8), the threshold voltage formula of NMOS transistor can be obtained as follows:
V T N = V T N 0 = Φ G C 2 ϕ F ( s u b s t r a t e ) Q B 0 C O X Q O X C O X
Introducing VTN = 0.45 V into formula (9) can determine the substrate doping concentration (NA) of nMOSFETs to be 3.556 × 1018 cm−3, and similarly, introducing VTP = −0.5 V into the corresponding formula can detemine the substrate doping concentration ND of pMOSFETs to be 4.202 × 1018 cm−3.
The above simulation parameter values were entered into the Sentaurus TCAD simulation software, NMOS and PMOS simulation models were built, and the obtained NMOS simulation device and PMOS simulation device were combined in MixedMode, so that the CMOS inverter simulation device designed by us can be obtained. Figure 4 shows the structural diagram of the CMOS inverter, in which PMOS is the upper tube, NMOS is the lower tube, and there is a common gate input and common drain output. The PMOS source was connected with a 5 V source voltage, and the NMOS source was grounded. The transmission characteristic curve and transient characteristic curve are important reference curves for testing the electrical performance of the CMOS inverter.

3. The MOS Driving Circuit Drives the Micro-LED

The simulation parameter values were entered into the Sentaurus TCAD simulation software to simulate the electrical characteristics of the MOSFETs, and the parameters were adjusted according to the obtained output characteristic curve, so as to obtain various physical parameters of MOSFETs, and the simulation value of the threshold voltage of MOSFETs was obtained according to the transfer characteristic curve, which is compared with the expected threshold voltage value, so as to judge whether the simulation result is correct or not.
The simulation result of NMOS and PMOS structure models are shown in Figure 5. Figure 5a,b are the physical structure model simulation diagrams of NMOS and PMOS devices, respectively. The length of the model simulation diagram is 1.48 μm and the height is 1.2 μm. Figure 5c is a simulation graph of transmission characteristics of NMOS devices. When the gate voltages are fixed at 1.0 V, 2.0 V, 3.0 V, 4.0 V and 5.0 V, respectively, the relationship curves between drain current and drain voltage are obtained. It can be found that when the gate voltage is greater than the turn-on voltage, the drain current curve shows a linear curve when the drain voltage is low, and the NMOS is equivalent to a variable resistor. At high level, the drain current does not change with the gate voltage, but mainly depends on the drain voltage. Figure 5d is a simulation graph of transmission characteristics of PMOS devices. When the gate voltages are fixed at −1.0 V, −2.0 V, −3.0 V, −4.0 V and −5.0 V, the relationship curves between drain current and drain voltage are obtained. Contrary to NMOS, the drain current curves show a linear curve when the drain voltage is at a high level, while the drain current is mainly determined by the drain voltage at a low level. By analyzing the simulation results of the NMOS and PMOS structure models, it can be concluded that NMOS and PMOS devices accord with their electrical characteristics.
The transfer characteristic simulation curves of NMOS and PMOS devices are shown in Figure 6. Figure 6a is the curve of drain current changing with gate voltage for the NMOS devices, with fixed drain voltages of 3.0 V, 4.0 V and 5.0 V, and Figure 6b is a partially enlarged diagram at low gate voltage. From Figure 6a,b, it can be found that the curves of NMOS transfer characteristics are similar under different drain voltages, and the threshold voltage points are the same, from which it can be concluded that the threshold voltage of NMOS is VTN ≈ 0.45 V. Figure 6c is the curve of drain current changing with gate voltage of the PMOS device, when the drain voltage is fixed at −3.0 V, −4.0 V and −5.0 V, and Figure 6d is a partially enlarged view of low gate voltage. From Figure 6c,d, it can be seen that the threshold voltage of PMOS is VTP ≈ −0.5 V. VTN ≈ 0.45 V and VTP ≈ −0.5 V and meet the expected threshold voltage values, which further verifies the correctness of the NMOS and PMOS simulation models designed in this experiment.
The transmission characteristic curve and the transient characteristic curve of the CMOS inverter are shown in Figure 7. Figure 7a,b are the transmission characteristic curves of CMOS inverters. The input voltage is a linear voltage curve, and the output voltage is 5 V when the input voltage is low, and 0 V when the input voltage is high, which has good anti-phase characteristics. The output current shows an off-on-off trend in this process and has good switching characteristics. Figure 7c,d show the transient characteristic curve of a CMOS inverter, and the input voltage is a trapezoidal pulse voltage curve. From Figure 7c, it can be seen that the rising curve of the output voltage curve at the end of the cycle is close to 5 V, so it will have good switching characteristics, and there will be no case where the secondary turn-on voltage cannot reach the turn-on voltage of the Micro-LED. However, the curve of current changing with time shown in Figure 7d has a long visual on time, which may have an important influence on the switching characteristics and needs further verification.
Compared with NMOS or PMOS devices, the switching characteristics of CMOS inverter devices have more obvious advantages in transmission characteristics. Therefore, this presents the research of Micro-LEDs driven by CMOS inverters and compares the situation of a micro-LED driven by NMOS and PMOS devices to explore the best MOS device for driving Micro-LEDs.
The micro-LED used in the simulation is a simulation device independently designed by our research group. For a Micro-LED, the physical models used include a mobility model, tunnel model, piezoelectric polarization model, incomplete ionization model, radiation recombination model, unbalanced carrier recombination (SRH recombination) model, Auger recombination model and a drift diffusion model. The epitaxial structure is shown in Figure 8a. The total length of the device is 10 μm. The substrate material is sapphire. From bottom to top, there are 4μm thick n-GaN layers and 15 nm thick quantum well layers, in which the barrier layer is 10 nm thick. The InGaN layer is 5 nm thick, and the quantum well layer is covered with a p-AlGaN layer with a thickness of 20 nm. The top layer is a 0.3 μm thick p-GaN layer. Table 2 summarizes the basic parameters of epitaxial structure. Figure 8b is the simulation result of the micro-LED device. Figure 8c is the simulation result of the volt-ampere characteristic curve of the Micro-LED, from which we can see that the turn-on voltage of the micro-LED is about 2.9 V. When the voltage is less than 2.9 V, it is called dead-time voltage. At this time, the external electrical field is not enough to overcome the blocking effect of the internal electrical field on majority carriers, and the forward current is almost zero. When the direct voltage exceeds 2.9 V, the internal electrical field is greatly weakened, the micro-LED is turned on, and the current increases with the increase of voltage. At 5 V, the current can reach 88 μA.
The micro-LED simulation device was combined with PMOS, NMOS and CMOS inverter driving circuits in MixedMode, and the micro-LED driving circuit diagram shown in Figure 9 is obtained. PMOS is still used as the upper tube and NMOS as the lower tube. The model structure of the MOS device driving the micro-LED is illustrated in Figure 10–CMOS inverter driving micro-LED device model. The flip-chip bonding method is adopted, in which indium balls are used as solder, the CMOS inverter driver is located under the silicon substrate, the indium balls are connected with pads on the silicon substrate, and then the metal electrodes and micro-LED chips are connected, and sapphire is on the top.
The simulation results of PMOS, NMOS and CMOS inverters driving Micro-LEDs directly are shown in Figure 11. Figure 11a,b show the output characteristic curve. The green curve is the change curve of Micro-LEDs driven by NMOS. It can be seen that when the input level is low, the output voltage is less than 5 V, (about 2.2 V), and the current value through the micro-LED is close to 0 A (1.9275 pA). This is because the NMOS is not completely turned off at a low level, and current flows through it, and the equivalent resistance of NMOS is similar to that of the micro-LED at this time, which leads to the voltage division between the NMOS and the Micro-LED. When the input voltage is high, the NMOS is on, and the micro-LED has a large partial voltage, which makes the output voltage close to 0 V and the current through the micro-LED close to 90 mA. Therefore, the driving circuit forms the switching characteristics of low-level off and high-level on, but an NMOS driving micro-LED has the disadvantage of an incomplete low-level off. The red curve is the change curve of the PMOS driven Micro-LED. When the input level is low, PMOS is on, its output voltage is close to 5 V, and the current through the micro-LED is close to −90 mA. When the input voltage is high, its output voltage is less than 0 V (about 2.8 V), and the current value through the micro-LED is close to 0 A (−0.9679 pA). This is because the PMOS is not completely turned off at the high level, current flows through it, and the equivalent resistance of the NMOS is close to that of the Micro-LED, so the voltage division between the NMOS and the micro-LED is close. Therefore, the driving circuit has the switching characteristics of low-level on and high-level off, but the PMOS driving the micro-LED has the disadvantage of an incomplete high-level off. The blue curve is the change curve of the CMOS inverter driving the Micro-LED. Unlike the first two, in the circuit of the CMOS inverter driving the Micro-LED, the micro-LED device is located between the output terminal of the CMOS inverter and the ground level. Therefore, the micro-LED will not start until the output voltage reaches the micro-LED turn-on voltage. As can be seen from Figure 11a, when the input voltage is about 2.644 V, the output voltage is 2.9 V, which reaches the turn-on voltage of the Micro-LED. Therefore, when the input voltage is low, the driving circuit is on, and the current value through the micro-LED is close to −90 mA; when the input voltage is high, the driving circuit is off, and the current value through the micro-LED is close to 0 A. Therefore, the driving circuit forms the switching characteristics of low-level on and high-level off, and the CMOS inverter driving the micro-LED does not have the problem of incomplete off.
In addition to judging the switching characteristics of the driving circuit according to the output characteristic curve, there is a relatively more important reference condition, that is, the rising time and falling time of the current in the transient characteristic curve. The smaller the sum of the two values, the steeper the rising edge and falling edge, the wider the signal bandwidth and the better the switching performance. The simulation results of transient characteristic curves of the micro-LED directly driven by PMOS, NMOS and CMOS inverters are shown in Figure 12a,b. The input voltage is a trapezoidal pulse voltage curve. From Figure 12b, it can be seen that three curves of current value passing through the micro-LED have rising edges and falling edges. Each curve of output current versus time is analyzed in more detail, that is, the rising time and falling time in the curve of output current versus time were analyzed.
Through the analysis of the graph simulation results of output current changing with time, we can get the rise time (tr), fall time (tf) and turn-on time (t) of the PMOS, NMOS and CMOS inverter driving circuits. The rise time (tr), is defined as the time value of 10–90% of the rise curve amplitude, the fall time (tf) is defined as the time value of 10–90% of the fall curve amplitude, and the turn-on time (t) is defined as the sum of the rise time (tr) and fall time (tf).
Figure 13 is the analysis of the process of rising time and falling time of the NMOS output current versus time. Figure 14 is the analysis of the process of rising time and falling time of the PMOS output current versus time. Figure 15 is the analysis of the process of rising time and falling time of the CMOS inverter output current versus time. According to the graphical analysis of simulation results, the rising time, tr = 4.94 ps, and the falling time, tf = 5.98 ps, tN = tr + tf = 10.92 ps; rise time tr = 3.0 ps and fall time tf = 3.3 ps, tP = tr + tf = 6.3 ps of the PMOS drive circuit; The rising time tr = 5.45 ps and falling time tf = 4.54 ps, tC = tr + tf = 9.99 ps of the CMOS inverter driving circuit.
According to the results’ analysis, it can be found that the turn-on times of the micro-LED directly driven by the PMOS, NMOS and CMOS inverters are as follows: NMOS driver, CMOS inverter driver and PMOS driver.
The surge phenomenon can be clearly observed in the curves of the output current of the micro-LED directly driven by the PMOS, NMOS and CMOS inverters with time. Connecting a current limiting resistor in the circuit can solve this problem. At the same time, the current limiting resistor can reduce the current at the load end of the Micro-LED and prevent the device from being damaged by excessive current. In addition, the current limiting resistor can also play the role of voltage division. In the previous analysis of the simulation results, the NMOS driver has no advantage. Therefore, next, we analyzed the situation where the PMOS and CMOS inverters are connected with current-limiting resistors to drive the Micro-LED. Two driving circuit diagrams of Micro-LEDs with series current limiting resistors are shown in Figure 16, and the resistance of the current limiting resistor is 10 KΩ.
Figure 17 is an analysis of the process of the rising time and falling time of the output current of the PMOS access current limiting resistor driving the micro-LED with time, and Figure 18 is an analysis of the process of the rising time and falling time of the output current of the CMOS inverter access current limiting resistor driving the micro-LED with time. According to the graphical analysis of the simulation results, the rising time tr = 5 ps, falling time tf = 6.71 ps, tN1 = tr + tf = 11.71 ps. The rising time tr = 17.2 ps, falling time tf = 17.2 ps, tC1 = tr + tf = 34.4 ps when the CMOS inverter is connected to the current-limiting resistor in the driving circuit.
According to the result analysis, it can be found that the turn-on time of the micro-LED driven by an access current-limiting resistor from long to short is the CMOS inverter driving circuit and the PMOS driving circuit.
The PMOS, NMOS and CMOS inverter drive circuits, which directly drive the Micro-LED, have more advantages than driving the micro-LED with a current limiting resistor. In terms of switching characteristics caused by output characteristics, the CMOS inverter driving the micro-LED has greater advantages; the PMOS driving micro-LED circuit has greater advantages in switching characteristics caused by transient characteristics. Statistics of on/off times under different driving conditions are shown in Table 3.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, Sentaurus TCAD simulation software is used to simulate the driving performance of a MOS-driven Micro-LED. Firstly, the NMOS device and PMOS device are designed and simulated, and the related parameters of the devices are obtained. The CMOS inverter device is composed of mixed-mode modules. Then, the circuit of direct driving the micro-LED by NMOS and PMOS is built and simulated by TCAD, and research of direct driving the micro-LED by CMOS inverter is presented for the first time. According to the output characteristic curve of the simulation results and the switching characteristics of the transient characteristic curve, the driving performance of the MOS-driven micro-LED is analyzed, and the three driving modes are compared. It is found that the driving mode of the CMOS inverter driving the micro-LED has greater advantages than the other two driving modes, and it does not have the problem of incomplete shutdown caused by the output characteristics. In terms of switching characteristics caused by transient characteristics, the driving mode of the PMOS driving micro-LED has the shortest switching time, only 6.30 ps, which makes the switching loss of the driving circuit smaller and has greater advantages. Finally, in order to eliminate the current surge phenomenon in the driving circuit, a 10 KΩ current limiting resistor is connected to the PMOS driving circuit and the CMOS inverter driving circuit, and the switching characteristics are analyzed according to the transient characteristic curve of the simulation results. It is found that the switching time value of the micro-LED driven by a direct drive is smaller than that of the micro-LED driven by a current limiting resistor, that is, the switching loss of the direct drive is smaller and has more advantages.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Z., L.Y., K.R. and J.Z.; methodology, X.Z. and L.Y.; software, X.Z. and K.R.; validation, X.Z., L.Y., K.R. and J.Z.; formal analysis, X.Z.; investigation, X.Z., L.Y. and K.R.; resources, X.Z., L.Y. and K.R.; data curation, J.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Z., L.Y. and K.R.; writing—review and editing, X.Z., L.Y., K.R. and J.Z.; visualization, X.Z.; supervision, L.Y. and K.R.; project administration, L.Y. and K.R.; funding acquisition, L.Y. and J.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission, grant number 21511101302 and 20010500100.

Acknowledgments

The author want to thank teacher Yin and teacher Ren for revising the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huang, Y.-M.; Chen, J.-H.; Liou, Y.-H.; Singh, K.J.; Tsai, W.-C.; Han, J.; Lin, C.-J.; Kao, T.-S.; Lin, C.-C.; Chen, S.-C.; et al. Correction: Huang et al. High-Uniform and High-Efficient Color Conversion Nanoporous GaN-Based Micro-LED Display with Embedded Quantum Dots. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2696, Erratum in Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bonar, J.R.; Valentine, G.J.; Gorton, S.W. Integrated Colour LED Micro-Display. U.S. Patent 10,862,010, 8 December 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hartensveld, M. 61-5: Fully Monolithic GaN µLED Display System. SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2021, 52, 880–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Meng, W.; Xu, F.; Yu, Z.; Tao, T.; Shao, L.; Liu, L.; Li, T.; Wen, K.; Wang, J.; He, L.; et al. Three-dimensional monolithic micro-LED display driven by atomically thin transistor matrix. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2021, 16, 1231–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liou, J.C. Circuitry of multiplexer-on-chip system within the micro-LED array manufacturing CMOS substrate. Opt. Quant. Electron. 2018, 50, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shieh, C.Y.; Tsai, C.W. 25.5: Characteristics of CMOS-based Micro LED Display by using Digital Modulation Technology. SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2021, 52, 344–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, Z.; Lin, R.; Qu, D.; Cui, X.; Tian, P. Ultrafast machine vision with artificial neural network devices based on a GaN-based micro-LED array. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 31963–31973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wei, Z.; Zhang, S.; Mao, S.; Wang, L.; Zhang, L.; Chen, C.J.; Wu, M.C.; Dong, Y.; Wang, L.; Luo, Y.; et al. Full-duplex high-speed indoor optical wireless communication system based on a micro-LED and VCSEL array. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 3891–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wei, Z.; Liu, Z.; Liu, X.; Wang, L.; Wang, L.; Yu, C.; Fu, H.Y. 8.75 Gbps visible light communication link using an artificial neural network equalizer and a single-pixel blue micro-LED. Opt. Lett. 2021, 46, 4670–4673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Zhou, X.; Tian, P.; Sher, C.-W.; Wu, J.; Liu, H.; Liu, R.; Kuo, H.-C. Growth, transfer printing and colour conversion techniques towards full-colour micro-LED display. Prog. Quantum Electron. 2020, 71, 100263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hsiang, E.L.; Yang, Z.; Yang, Q.; Lan, Y.-F.; Wu, S.-T. Prospects and challenges of mini-LED, OLED, and micro-LED displays. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2021, 29, 446–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, Y.; Dong, X.; Han, S.; Song, Y.; Sheng, C.; Wang, C.; Huang, Q.; Ge, Y. 25.6: A Study on Micro-LED Stamp Transfer Technology: Requirement and Challenges. SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2021, 52, 347–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Su, Z.; Zhanghu, M.; Liu, Z. P-12.5: Investigation on AR/VR Displays Based on Novel Micro-LED Technology. SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2021, 52, 609–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, X.; Qi, L.; Chong, W.C.; Li, P.; Tang, C.W.; Lau, K.M. Active matrix monolithic micro-LED full-color micro-display. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2021, 29, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chang, K.P.; Lien, P.C.; Yen, C.C.; Chen, P.W.; Horng, R.H.; Wuu, D.S. High Performance AlGaInP-Based Micro-LED Displays with Novel Pixel Structures. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2021, 33, 1375–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zabeli, M.; Caka, N.; Limani, M.; Kabashi, Q. The Most Significant MOSFET Parameters Impact in CMOS Inverter Switching Characteristics. Int. J. Circuits Syst. Signal Processing 2018, 12, 565–572. [Google Scholar]
  17. Han, Z. The power-delay product and its implication to CMOS Inverter. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2021; Volume 1754, p. 012131. [Google Scholar]
  18. Shuangshuang, S.; Kun, L.; Xinxing, L.; Jinfeng, Z.; Chuan, L.; Zheng, C.; Jianwen, Z. Large-area (64 × 64 array) inkjet-printed high-performance metal oxide bilayer heterojunction thin film transistors and n-metal-oxide-semiconductor (NMOS) inverters. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 81, 26–35. [Google Scholar]
  19. Subhash, S.; Hiroyuki, M.; Shizuo, T. Flexible low-voltage organic thin-film transistors and PMOS inverters: The effect of channel width on noise margin. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2021, 54, 315102. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shin, S.-B.; Iiijima, K.-I.; Chiba, J.-I.; Okada, H.; Iwayama, S.; Wakahara, A. Integration of micro-light-emitting-diode arrays and silicon driver for heterogeneous optoelectronic integrated circuit device. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 50, 04DG12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mcgovern, B.; Drakakis, E.; Neil, M.; O’Brian, P.; Corbett, B.; Berlinguer-Palmini, R.; Degenaar, P. Individually addressable optoelectronic arrays for optogenetic neural stimulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS), San Diego, CA, USA, 10–12 November 2011; pp. 329–332. [Google Scholar]
  22. Griffiths, A.D.; Islim, M.S.; Herrnsdorf, J.; McKendry, J.J.D.; Henderson, R.; Haas, H.; Gu, E.; Dawson, M.D. CMOS-integrated GaN LED array for discrete power level stepping in visible light communications. Opt. Express 2017, 25, A338–A345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, R.; Lu, T.; Wei, F.; Liu, Y.; Yan, S.; Zhanghu, M.; Liu, Z. Light responsive Micro-LED arrays for Interactive Display Applications. SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2018, 49, 681–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lee, H.-C.; Lu, Y.-C.; Lin, Y.-C.; Lai, W.-L.; Hsieh, H.-Y.; Jaw, B.-Y.; Chuang, C.-T.; Chen, Y.-C.; Chen, Y.-J.E. A High Voltage Driving Chiplet in Standard 0.18-μm CMOS for Micro-Pixelated LED Displays Integrated with LTPS TFTs. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hassan, N.B.; Dehkhoda, F.; Xie, E.; Herrnsdorf, J.; Strain, M.J.; Henderson, R.; Dawson, M.D. Ultra-high frame rate digital light projector using chipscale LED-on-CMOS technology. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2111.13586. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim, T.; Jeon, J. Design of Pixel Circuit of Micro LED Display with Double Gate Thin Film Transistors. J. Semicond. Disp. Technol. 2022, 21, 50–55. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Physical structure of an N-channel enhancement MOSFET.
Figure 1. Physical structure of an N-channel enhancement MOSFET.
Electronics 11 02044 g001
Figure 2. NMOS/PMOS current direction. (a) NMOS as upper and lower tubes. (b) PMOS as upper and lower tubes.
Figure 2. NMOS/PMOS current direction. (a) NMOS as upper and lower tubes. (b) PMOS as upper and lower tubes.
Electronics 11 02044 g002
Figure 3. Width–length ratio of PMOS and NMOS under different process conditions.
Figure 3. Width–length ratio of PMOS and NMOS under different process conditions.
Electronics 11 02044 g003
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the CMOS inverter structure.
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the CMOS inverter structure.
Electronics 11 02044 g004
Figure 5. (a) NMOS model diagram; (b) PMOS model diagram; (c) NMOS output characteristic curve; (d) PMOS output characteristic curve.
Figure 5. (a) NMOS model diagram; (b) PMOS model diagram; (c) NMOS output characteristic curve; (d) PMOS output characteristic curve.
Electronics 11 02044 g005
Figure 6. (a) NMOS transfer characteristic curve; (b) Partially enlarged diagram of NMOS transfer characteristic curve; (c) PMOS transfer characteristic curve; (d) Partial enlargement of PMOS transfer characteristic curve.
Figure 6. (a) NMOS transfer characteristic curve; (b) Partially enlarged diagram of NMOS transfer characteristic curve; (c) PMOS transfer characteristic curve; (d) Partial enlargement of PMOS transfer characteristic curve.
Electronics 11 02044 g006
Figure 7. Transmission characteristic curve and transient characteristic curve of the CMOS inverter. (a) voltage transmission characteristic curve; (b) Current transmission characteristic curve; (c) voltage transient characteristic curve; (d) Current transient characteristic curve.
Figure 7. Transmission characteristic curve and transient characteristic curve of the CMOS inverter. (a) voltage transmission characteristic curve; (b) Current transmission characteristic curve; (c) voltage transient characteristic curve; (d) Current transient characteristic curve.
Electronics 11 02044 g007
Figure 8. (a) Micro-LED epitaxial structure diagram. (b) Simulation result diagram of micro-LED equipment. (c) Simulation result diagram of the volt-ampere characteristic curve of a Micro-LED.
Figure 8. (a) Micro-LED epitaxial structure diagram. (b) Simulation result diagram of micro-LED equipment. (c) Simulation result diagram of the volt-ampere characteristic curve of a Micro-LED.
Electronics 11 02044 g008
Figure 9. (a) PMOS direct drive Micro-LED circuit diagram; (b) Circuit diagram of NMOS direct drive Micro-LED; (c) Circuit diagram of CMOS inverter directly driving Micro-LED.
Figure 9. (a) PMOS direct drive Micro-LED circuit diagram; (b) Circuit diagram of NMOS direct drive Micro-LED; (c) Circuit diagram of CMOS inverter directly driving Micro-LED.
Electronics 11 02044 g009
Figure 10. CMOS inverter device driving a micro-LED device, model diagram.
Figure 10. CMOS inverter device driving a micro-LED device, model diagram.
Electronics 11 02044 g010
Figure 11. (a) output voltage-input voltage graph. (b) Output current-input voltage graph.
Figure 11. (a) output voltage-input voltage graph. (b) Output current-input voltage graph.
Electronics 11 02044 g011
Figure 12. (a) Output voltage-time curve; (b) Output current-time curve.
Figure 12. (a) Output voltage-time curve; (b) Output current-time curve.
Electronics 11 02044 g012
Figure 13. Analysis of the rising time and falling time of the output current curve of the NMOS directly driving the micro-LED with time.
Figure 13. Analysis of the rising time and falling time of the output current curve of the NMOS directly driving the micro-LED with time.
Electronics 11 02044 g013
Figure 14. Analysis of rising time and falling time of the output current curve of the PMOS directly driving the micro-LED with time.
Figure 14. Analysis of rising time and falling time of the output current curve of the PMOS directly driving the micro-LED with time.
Electronics 11 02044 g014
Figure 15. Analysis of rising time and falling time of the output current curve of the micro-LED directly driven by the CMOS inverter with time.
Figure 15. Analysis of rising time and falling time of the output current curve of the micro-LED directly driven by the CMOS inverter with time.
Electronics 11 02044 g015
Figure 16. (a) PMOS series current limiting resistor driving Micro-LED; (b) CMOS inverter connected in series with current limiting resistor to drive Micro-LED.
Figure 16. (a) PMOS series current limiting resistor driving Micro-LED; (b) CMOS inverter connected in series with current limiting resistor to drive Micro-LED.
Electronics 11 02044 g016
Figure 17. Analysis of rising time and falling time of the output current curve of the micro-LED driven by the PMOS current limiting resistor with time.
Figure 17. Analysis of rising time and falling time of the output current curve of the micro-LED driven by the PMOS current limiting resistor with time.
Electronics 11 02044 g017
Figure 18. Analysis of rising time and falling time of the output current curve of the micro-LED driven by the CMOS inverter, connected with a current limiting resistor with time.
Figure 18. Analysis of rising time and falling time of the output current curve of the micro-LED driven by the CMOS inverter, connected with a current limiting resistor with time.
Electronics 11 02044 g018
Table 1. Comparison of performance parameters of LCD, OLED and micro-LED display devices.
Table 1. Comparison of performance parameters of LCD, OLED and micro-LED display devices.
TechniqueLCDOLEDMicro-LED
ModePoor LightAutoluminescenceAutoluminescence
Lumen EfficiencyLowMiddleHigh
Contrast1000:110,000:11,000,000:1
Lumen Intensity (cd/m2)3000100010,000
Service Life (h)60 k20–30 k80–1000 k
Response Speedmsusns
Working Temp (°C)−40–10030–85100–120
Energy Consumed100%60–80%30–40%
CostLowMiddleHigh
Table 2. Summary of Basic Parameters of Epitaxial Structure.
Table 2. Summary of Basic Parameters of Epitaxial Structure.
Parameter Value
Equipment length 10 μm
Bottom passivation layer length 2 μm
Bottom passivation layer thickness 0.5 μm
n-GaN thickness 4 μm
Quantum well
thickness
GaN thickness0.01 μm
InGaN thickness0.005 μm
p-AlGaN thickness 0.02 μm
p-GaN thickness 0.3 μm
Top passivation layer length 2 μm
Top passivation layer thickness 0.05 μm
Table 3. Statistics of on/off Times in Different Driving States.
Table 3. Statistics of on/off Times in Different Driving States.
State of Driving the Micro-LEDNMOS DrivePMOS DriveCMOS Inverter
Drive
PMOS Access Current Limiting Resistor DrivingCMOS Inverter Access Current Limiting Resistor Drive
The rise time (ps)4.943.005.455.0017.20
The fall time (ps)5.983.304.546.7117.20
The turn-on time (ps)10.926.309.9911.7134.40
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Yin, L.; Ren, K.; Zhang, J. Research on Simulation Design of MOS Driver for Micro-LED. Electronics 2022, 11, 2044. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11132044

AMA Style

Zhang X, Yin L, Ren K, Zhang J. Research on Simulation Design of MOS Driver for Micro-LED. Electronics. 2022; 11(13):2044. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11132044

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xuesong, Luqiao Yin, Kailin Ren, and Jianhua Zhang. 2022. "Research on Simulation Design of MOS Driver for Micro-LED" Electronics 11, no. 13: 2044. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11132044

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop