1. Introduction
Globally, the problem of environmental pollution and air pollution is a key issue. Vehicles using fossil fuels are a major cause of environmental pollution due to exhaust gas. Recently, many battery-based technologies, such as ESS, EV, and LEV have been introduced in accordance with the growth of the battery market and environmental pollution problems. The battery market share is growing day by day, and exhaust-gas-free EVs and LEVs will solve the problem of air pollution. In addition, compared to a general vehicle, it has the advantage of less maintenance and less noise; however, fires frequently occur in many lithium-ion battery-based ESS, EV, and LEV operating worldwide. The risk is high, especially for topologies that use high currents, such as fast charging. A lot of research on charging technology and charging efficiency is in progress. On the other hand, studies on charging monitoring and management are still rare compared to charging-related studies [
1,
2].
In the case of fast charging technology, the C-rate of the battery is higher than that of a general charging system. Therefore, as the charging current increases, the amount of power increases. High charging current causes battery heat, overcharge, and over-discharge. In order to efficiently manage the battery, it is necessary to check the charging current and voltage status of the battery in real-time. In addition, depending on the temperature condition of the battery, an appropriate current control system can solve the heat generation problem. In the case of a large ESS system, a temperature control system for temperature heating is applied. However, systems such as LEVs often do not have systems that can control temperature. Failure to properly control the temperature can be dangerous enough to cause a fire in the worst case. Lithium-ion batteries are expensive, and if a fire breaks out, the charging system and LEV system would fail. If the temperature can be checked in real-time, charging can be made safely depending on the battery condition. By quickly providing the user with battery conditions, accidents such as fires and explosions that occur during charging can be prevented [
3,
4,
5].
LLC resonant converters are used in various industries and applications because they can perform power conversion with high density and high efficiency [
6,
7]. The resonance converter may adjust the output voltage by controlling the frequency by changing the voltage gain according to the switching frequency. Fast charging systems generally use CC (Constant Current) and CV (Constant Voltage). CC is a method of charging using a constant current, and in fast charging, a high current is charged compared to a general charger. On the other hand, CV is a constant voltage charging method that charges until a certain voltage is reached. CC–CV (Constant Current – Constant Voltage) starts with CC at the initial stage of charging and is charged in a CV state when it reaches a state of charge (SOC) of 70 to 80% [
8,
9,
10]. In the initial state, charging proceeds quickly in the current control state. The battery is fully charged with a predetermined voltage through the voltage controller.
In [
11], internet of things (IoT) technology was applied to achieve efficient communication between the interdependent components of an EV charger. Data are collected, stored, analyzed, and shared with IoT devices from smartphones [
12]. In the case of a user-friendly IoT system such as [
13], the user can easily check the battery status through monitoring. The user can obtain information through a smartphone and usefully check the battery charge status; however, it does not take temperature into account, so the charging rate may affect the battery. In the case of EV and LEV chargers as in [
14,
15], the user cannot check the state of charge of the battery. Therefore, it is not easy for the user to efficiently manage the battery. In addition, most studies are focused on efficiency rather than user-friendly research-based on IoT. Power conversion efficiency is also an important factor, but research is needed to enable users to efficiently manage battery status information and efficiency.
This study proposes a fast charger using an LLC resonant converter. In addition, a monitoring system is proposed to efficiently manage the temperature, charging voltage, and current of the battery in real-time. Fast charging power operates in a soft-switching state in the DC/DC stage. We propose efficient management of fast charging systems based on a real-time monitoring system. The rest of this paper is organized in seven sections. After introduction, the system overview is demonstrated in
Section 2. The proposed controller structure is described in
Section 3. Additionally, the results and discussion are verified in
Section 4. We summarize the results in
Section 5.
3. Proposed Controller Structure
This section shows the proposed controller block diagram and the flowchart of the IoT-based controller. The CC/CV charging method is a widely used method for charging lead-acid batteries and lithium-ion batteries. The CC (Constant Current) method is a method of charging with a current with a constant control value. The CV (Constant Voltage) method is a charging method based on a voltage of a constant control value.
Figure 5a shows the control block diagram of CC/CV charging method. The two charging methods are the method of controlling the current and voltage through PFM control through the PI controller according to the reference value. A PFM signal is applied to the switching element of the LLC resonant converter, and the desired output is obtained through a switching operation accordingly.
Figure 5b shows the voltage/current charging graph; when the battery starts charging, it is initially charged with a constant control current through the CC method. As charging proceeds, the voltage gradually rises. When the voltage rises to the set value, from then on, it charges in CV mode. In the constant voltage state, the value of the current gradually decreases, and charging is complete when the current decreases to near zero. The CC/CV charging method, as shown in
Figure 5b, is the most widely used charging method. In addition to the CC/CV charging method, there are the CC charging method and the CV charging method; however, in the CC charging method, the voltage of the closed-circuit due to the internal resistance of the cell becomes higher than the voltage of the device itself, and thus 100% charging is not possible. In the CV charging method, an overcurrent may occur due to the potential difference in the initial voltage.
The main control goal of the proposed ICT system is to allow the user to check the charging status and select between quick charging and normal charging mode. The charging level is directly related to the charging rate. If the user, that is, the consumer side management is considered, the user’s desired charging can be considered; indeed, charge level or speed has a direct correlation with battery life. In addition, you can check the charging status of the charger in real-time through the smartphone application. The operational flowchart of the IoT system is shown in
Figure 6.
The operation of the proposed system starts with the operation of the IoT system and the charging system. In the initial start, the charger and IoT system are operated. After operation, the IoT system creates a web server and uploads data to the web. The smartphone app accesses the web server and reads data. Check the operation and connection status of the IoT system, smartphone app, and charger. If all the system states are not satisfied, the initial operation is restarted. When the operation and connection status of all systems are satisfied, the charging mode is selected through the smartphone app. Charging does not start until the mode is selected, but waits for the mode to be selected. When the charging mode is selected, the connection status of the battery and the readiness for charging are checked through the data of the output voltage and input voltage. If the output and input voltages are not met, the operation is terminated. When the values of the output and input are met, the soft-start starts charging. Once charging starts, the charging status is transmitted to the web server, and the user can check the data. Charging is repeated until it reaches 33.6V, and data are sent to the web server in real-time. When 33.6V is met, charging is terminated. When charging is finished, the Mode State of the first interface of the app is displayed as Finish.
In general, the allowable charging temperature of lithium-ion batteries is between 20 and 40 degrees. In addition, the temperature at which rapid charging is possible is 25 to 30 degrees Celsius, so that rapid charging is possible; however, in the case of rapid charging, it is a charging method that affects the lifespan of the battery and the temperature rise. Therefore, appropriate charge control is required to mitigate the battery life and temperature rise. In this paper, we propose a charging method that automatically controls the charging current of the battery according to the temperature using the Auto mode. A method for a user to charge the battery is divided into a user charging mode and an Auto mode. Users can select a charging method and check the charging status in real-time; in the user charging mode, the user selects and charges a fixed control current in a general charging method. On the other hand, in the case of Auto mode, it is a charging method by calculating an appropriate control current based on real-time temperature information; by increasing or decreasing the control current based on the temperature information, it reduces the temperature rise and burden on the battery during charging.
Figure 7a,b shows graphs showing the charging current according to temperature; the two graphs can be expressed as Equations (6) and (7).
Figure 7a,b graphs are divided based on the battery temperature of 30 degrees. Due to the nature of the battery, the performance varies depending on the temperature. Therefore, the current was determined considering the low and high-temperature conditions. A general charging system is charged in the CC mode through a constant reference current value without considering the temperature state; however, in the proposed method, the charging parameters change in real-time according to the temperature state.
4. Results and Discussion
Figure 8 shows the experimental setup of the proposed charger system. It consists of an LLC resonant converter, IoT system and Li-ion Battery.
Figure 9 shows the charging waveform of the LLC converter. Charging shows the waveform in Fast Charging mode. it is controlled in CC mode. also, it shows the operation in the ZVS region through the waveform of the inductor and the waveform of the primary side voltage in the charging waveform. The frequency is modulated to follow the current value selected as the control value. In Fast Charging mode, it operates at the same frequency as the resonant frequency and converts power to the most efficient state. However, when fast charging is performed for a long period of time, the temperature of the battery and converter may rise, which may decrease the efficiency and safety of the battery. Therefore, the proposed method provides the user to select the filling level. Also, in the case of Auto mode, it is controlled in consideration of the temperature condition of the battery.
Figure 10 shows the operation waveform and the monitoring interface in the proposed Auto mode. In the case of Auto mode, the control current is determined according to the temperature.
Figure 10 shows the time of operation at a relatively high temperature; The control current is determined and operated according to the temperature, and it can be confirmed that the voltage gain is changed by changing the Fast Charging mode and the switching frequency by changing the control current command, thereby controlling the charging current. Moreover, it shows the operation in the ZVS region through the waveform of the inductor and the waveform of the primary side voltage in the charging waveform. Through the interface, the user can easily know the current battery voltage, charging current, temperature and power status.
Figure 11 shows the operating point at a relatively low temperature. In Auto mode, the control current is determined according to the temperature, while the monitoring interface in the figure shows the situation when the charging voltage and temperature are low. In Auto mode, the control charging current is controlled to 30A or less; in addition, switching loss can be minimized by ZVS operation, and in the case of Auto mode, it is decided based on the graph of the current command according to the temperature in
Section 5. In Auto mode, the temperature rises, and safe charging of the battery and converter is possible compared to the general charging method; it reduces the burden on the battery by rationally giving the charge current command according to the situation, notifying the user of the state of the battery in real-time, and the user can decide how to charge the battery so that the battery can be managed efficiently.
Figure 9 shows the operation in the Fast Charging Mode selected by the user. Moreover,
Figure 10 and
Figure 11 show the waveform in Auto mode. In Fast Charging Mode, it is shown that it operates without considering the temperature. If the temperature is 28.2 °C, we have a control command of about 26.4 A, depending on the calculation. It can be seen that the Fast Charging Mode is fixed and controlled with a control current of 30 A. Unlike
Figure 10 and
Figure 11, it has a fixed current control value, so the charging level is high; however, if temperature is not taken into account, it may cause battery life or excessive temperature rise, which may cause a fire.
Figure 10 and
Figure 11 operate in Auto mode while
Figure 10 shows the Auto mode above 31 °C. The control current value is calculated and controlled by Equation (6). In
Figure 11, the control current value is calculated by Equation (7).
Figure 9 has a constant current reference. On the other hand,
Figure 10 and
Figure 11 have the control current command is calculated in real-time. Therefore, compared to the Fast Charging Mode, it is advantageous for the temperature rise of the battery and battery life by compensating for the temperature; however, there is a disadvantage that the charging speed is slow compared to the Fast Charging Mode.
Various studies are being conducted to determine the fire or lifecycle of batteries. In particular, in the case of fast charging, it can be charged in a shorter time compared to a general charging method; however, rapid charging causes the battery temperature to rise. The temperature rise of the battery affects the lifecycle and performance of the battery. The change in the charging current according to the temperature suggested in this paper reduces the strain on the battery by lowering the charging current when the temperature rises. The control of the charging current according to the temperature of the battery was checked for a battery with a low capacity. In the future, it is necessary to verify the experiment on high-capacity batteries.
5. Conclusions and Future Work
In this paper, a charger applied with IoT-based real-time monitoring and a charging method considering the temperature state is proposed. In the case of a general charger, there is a restriction in the user’s ability to check or control the charging state and charging method. In this paper, the user can easily check the charging status in real-time. In addition, it has been proposed that the user can select a charging method as well. As for the charging method, the user can select a general charging method and a charging method in consideration of temperature. The charging method considering the temperature is designed to safely and quickly charge the battery by controlling the charging level according to the temperature of the battery. Experiments were conducted by manufacturing a charger and IoT system prototype. The proposed prototype calculates the control current according to the temperature situation. It has been shown that the charger can be controlled based on the calculated control current. Based on the experimental results, it was shown that the switching loss can be reduced, and safe charging can be controlled through ZVS operation during charging. The system presented in this paper was verified through experiments and prototype systems using small-capacity batteries, such as LEVs. Future research and verification through high-capacity batteries such as EVs and ESSs are needed. The battery market is growing day by day, and battery management is becoming more important. We propose a battery management system considering only the battery temperature. In the case of a battery, it is also greatly affected by the ambient temperature. In the future, a battery management system that considers the temperature of the battery and the ambient temperature is required. We plan to design and manufacture a real-time management algorithm that takes into account verification in high-capacity batteries and ambient temperature.