Calculation and Analysis of Characteristic Parameters for Lossy Resonator
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Resonator model was not shown and detailed. The paper has poor presentation especially regarding methods. There are no information about current distribution or coupling matrices.SPSS evaluation in terms of reliability is questionable.
1. What is the main question addressed by the research? Ans: merely physical parametric studies about lossy dielectric resonator. 2. Do you consider the topic original or relevant in the field? Does it address a specific gap in the field? Ans: relevant but it needs revisions and more details to fill the gaps in its field. 3. What does it add to the subject area compared with other published material? Ans: some parametric studies about quality factor . 4. What specific improvements should the authors consider regarding the methodology? What further controls should be considered? Ans: Investigated resonator was not shown nor its dimensions and other properties are explained. Current intensity and coupling factor are questionable. SPSS results investigation is questionable. 5.Are the conclusions consistent with the evidence and arguments presentedand do they address the main question posed?
Ans: not enough.6. Are the references appropriate? Ans: enough. 7. Please include any additional comments on the tables and figures. Ans: Investigated resonator was not shown nor its dimensions and other properties are explained. Current intensity and coupling factor are questionable. SPSS results investigation is questionable. Above revisions can be figures or tables.
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
Thank you for allowing a resubmission of our manuscript, with an opportunity to address the reviewers’ comments.
We are uploading (a) our point-by-point response to the comments, (b) an updated manuscript in Track Change version, and (c) a clean updated manuscript without Track Change (PDF main document). Please see the attachment.
Best regards,
Yu Yu et al.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
In the paper 'Calculation and Analysis of Characteristic Parameters for Lossy Resonator' the authors present their recent results about a novel lossy resonator model calculation approach. The paper is well written and the results are clearly presented. It could be interesting to check their results with FEM simulations. However, I believe that this work can be published in the present form.
My main indication was to accept the paper in the present form. However, I add here few minor comments: 1. In Fig. 1 the materials are defined with [1], [2], [3]. I suggest the authors remove the brackets; 2. All the eqs at page 4 and 5 should be placed elsewhere (in appendix or supporting materials file) as all the details of the calculations are difficult to read entirely; 3. The authors should better stress why the error in fig.3 is increasing as a function of deltah instead in fig.4 is decreasing (until a minima) as a function of deltah.
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
Thank you for allowing a resubmission of our manuscript, with an opportunity to address the reviewers’ comments.
We are uploading (a) our point-by-point response to the comments, (b) an updated manuscript in Track Change version, and (c) a clean updated manuscript without Track Change. Please see the attachment.
Best regards,
Yu Yu et al.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Revisions and Author responses are reasonable. The revised paper is acceptable.
