Next Article in Journal
Web-Based 3D Virtual Environments Utilization in Primary and Secondary Education of Children with Multiple Impairments
Previous Article in Journal
Beyond Land: A Review of Benchmarking Datasets, Algorithms, and Metrics for Visual-Based Ship Tracking
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimal Placement and Sizing of D-STATCOMs in Electrical Distribution Networks Using a Stochastic Mixed-Integer Convex Model
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Closed-Loop Control of the Half-Bridge-Based MMC Drive with Variable DC-Link Voltage

Electronics 2023, 12(13), 2791; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132791
by Mauricio Espinoza 1,*, Matias Diaz 2, Enrique Espina 2, Andrés Mora 3, Arturo Letelier 4, Felipe Donoso 4 and Roberto Cárdenas 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Electronics 2023, 12(13), 2791; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132791
Submission received: 30 April 2023 / Revised: 18 June 2023 / Accepted: 21 June 2023 / Published: 24 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Distribution System Analysis: Optimization and Control)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1. How does the proposed closed-loop control approach ensure a constant voltage fluctuation in the capacitors of the MMC during the whole operating range?

2. Can you explain in more detail the small-signal model that was developed to analyze the dynamic of the MMC when the magnitude of the dc-port voltage E is modified?

3. What are the main advantages and disadvantages of using a low value of E during LFM, as demonstrated in the paper?

4. How does the proposed closed-loop control system modify the dc-port voltage considering the dynamics of the capacitor voltages and not only steady-state expressions?

5. Can you explain how the proposed approach reduces the common-mode voltage during LFM and how this reduces the damage to the machine insulation or the leakage currents in the bearing?

6. What kind of experimental validation tests were conducted using the 7.5 kW experimental prototype composed of an induction machine fed by an MMC with 18 half-bridge cells?

7. How does the proposed closed-loop control system compare to conventional control strategies in terms of its effectiveness and feasibility?

8. Can you explain the behavior of the oscillating component of the cluster voltage v˜XcX (with X=P or N and x=a, b or c) during low-frequency modes?

9. How does the peak value of the circulating currents change when using the margin-based control strategy compared to the full-mitigation strategy?

10. What are the limitations of the machine-side MMC in terms of dynamic regulation and how does the proposed approach address them?

Minor Corrections are required.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The aim of this work was the theoretical and experimental investigation of the influence of the dc-port voltage on the Modular Multilevel Converter under low and high frequency modes. Authors demonstrated that undesired dynamic changes can appear for sudden changes in E according to the state-space model of the dynamics of the cluster voltages. In order to regulate the cluster voltages authors used the closed-loop as an effective and feasible control system. The topic is original  in the field. The effectiveness of the proposed solution was demonstrated  according to  simulation studies performed using a 7.5 kW experimental prototype based on an induction machine fed by an Modular Multilevel Converter with 18 half-bridge cells. The conclusions are consistent with the evidence and arguments presented. The references have been adequately cited and discussed. The paper is well written and is suitable for this Journal. Manuscript can be accepted for publication without any further changes.


Author Response

Dear reviewer, Thank you very much for your review.
We are pleased that you considered our work good enough to be published.

Reviewer 3 Report

The article proposes a control for CMM with variable voltage on the DC link. Theoretical analysis is satisfactory, but more experimental results are needed. So my comments are:

  1. Add the name of the variable to which it corresponds to the waveforms in Fig. 8.

2. Label figure 8 as (a) and (b) not left and right.

3. Add the waveform referring to the experimental common mode voltage using the proposed method and the conventional method

4. Is Figure 10 experimental? It looks like a simulation result. Add experimental results.

5. Add other DC link voltage variations and show the experimental results obtained.

 

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

We sincerely appreciate you taking the time to read our work. We have carefully considered your comments, and we are now providing our responses to address them. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Paper can be accepted in the present form.

No corrections.

Reviewer 3 Report

Thanks for the clarification, no more questions. Congratulations for the paper.

Back to TopTop