Improved Resnet Model Based on Positive Traffic Flow for IoT Anomalous Traffic Detection
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The presented paper is interesting, and the presented method has an exciting potential to improve the efficiency of IDS and IPS systems. On page 5, the PCAP format for recording network data is described. The PCAP format is not uniform and should be further specified. A citation of the standard used can be given: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/id/draft-gharris-opsawg-pcap-00.html.
The data extraction described on page 5 does not consider the type and nature of the data - TCP(ACK) and UDP. How does your method deal with duplicate packets, out-of-order packets, or ACK packets in TCP flows? Is it necessary to filter them? What will be the effect of these packets on the accuracy of the analysis? Since you focus your method on IoT networking environments, you must account for increased error rates in wireless environments. Without answering these questions, I do not find your Section 3.1 complete.
The text contains several typos and formatting errors (rows: 42, 47, 54, 122, etc.).It usually is readable.
Table 2 contains chinas chars. Is it correct?
Author Response
Thank you very much for taking the time to review this manuscript. As shown in the attached content, we have revised and replied point by point to your proposed revisions. Regarding the English language expression, we have requested the help of MDPI's Professional Paper Rewriters to review and correct the manuscript.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The Paper's combined approach is proved to work with excellent accuracy. Great work.
I wish you elaborate more on the introduction and cite more refs, as some statements left with no citations. However, overall you did great job.
Author Response
Thank you very much for taking the time to review this manuscript. We may have missed some of the citations during the writing of our manuscript, we re-examine our introductory section and add the missing citations.
Reviewer 3 Report
Please find the attached file report.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Can be improved.
Author Response
Thank you very much for taking the time to review this manuscript. As shown in the attached content, we have revised and replied point by point to your proposed revisions. Regarding the English language expression, we have requested the help of MDPI's Professional Paper Rewriters to review and correct the paper.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Please cite reference 41 according to the appropriate conventions.
Author Response
Thank you for the formatting citation issue, it has been fixed.