Next Article in Journal
Point-of-Interest Recommendations Based on Immediate User Preferences and Contextual Influences
Previous Article in Journal
Research on Time Delay Estimation Method of Partial Discharges Signal with Improved Weighted Function
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Comparison of Multi-Object Control Methods Using Multi-Objective Optimization

Electronics 2023, 12(20), 4198; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12204198
by Józef Lisowski
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Electronics 2023, 12(20), 4198; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12204198
Submission received: 15 September 2023 / Revised: 6 October 2023 / Accepted: 8 October 2023 / Published: 10 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Systems & Control Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Define the acronyms used in fig. 1 and explain widely this figure.

Verify if the colors used in figures can be distinguished in a black amd white figure, also the lines are very thin.

Verify the redaction in some cases the variables appear as italics an in some cases as normal text. if it are different mention that.

Place the figures close to their mention.

Redraw and explain widelly figure 4 and their double outputs in the conditions, double utputs in process. 

Explain widelly figures and tables.

Are required the comparison with an exact method and the addition of a table with the errors or deviations versus the ideal trajectory.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

1. The document I downloaded seems not to have the numbered lines, I don't know if it is the correct format.

2. Improve the introduction

3. Increase the number of citations

4. Be specific with the software used to make the graphs in figures 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11.

5. Improve conclusions

6. Reference number 14 is a self-citation please remove.

7. On page 4, in paragraph 5 the 'V0' is not in equation mode

8. The way of citing the equations makes the development of the work a little confusing, I see several repeated quotes, plus there are equations that are not cited.

No comment

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

See the comments in the uploaded file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Minor editing of English language required.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Reference [17] and [18] are self-citations

There are several equations that are not cited, an example of this is equation 1, 2 and 3

No comment

Author Response

References [17] and [18] as self-citations have been removed.
Equations and citation of non-author's equations have been tidied up.
I would like to thank the reviewer for his valuable comments, which allowed me to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Reviewer 3 Report

The comments have been handled.

Minor editing of English language required.

Author Response

I would like to thank the Reviewer for his valuable comments, which allowed me to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Back to TopTop