Next Article in Journal
Measuring Brain Activation Patterns from Raw Single-Channel EEG during Exergaming: A Pilot Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of A* Algorithm Based on Extended Neighborhood Priority Search in Multi-Scenario Maps
Previous Article in Journal
Intelligent Pick-and-Place System Using MobileNet
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving Path Accuracy of Mobile Robots in Uncertain Environments by Adapted Bézier Curves
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Dual Forward–Backward Algorithm to Solve Convex Model Predictive Control for Obstacle Avoidance in a Logistics Scenario

Electronics 2023, 12(3), 622; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030622
by Daniele Ludovico 1,*,†, Paolo Guardiani 1,†, Alessandro Pistone 1,†, Lorenzo De Mari Casareto Dal Verme 1,2, Darwin G. Caldwell 1 and Carlo Canali 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Electronics 2023, 12(3), 622; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030622
Submission received: 19 December 2022 / Revised: 20 January 2023 / Accepted: 23 January 2023 / Published: 26 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Path Planning for Mobile Robots)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper proposes a new algorithm for the warehouse robot path-finding problem (formulated into a convex problem). It is well-written, and the background is clearly presented. Good work!

 

From a practitioner's point of view, I'd like the authors to clarify the potential slowness brought by the DFBA algorithm. More specifically, the authors claim "the DFBA requires a relatively high number of iterations." Would it be possible that the longer convergence time makes the algorithm unusable in practice? 

Author Response

Please, see the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

   This research proposes a dual forward-backward algorithm to solve convex model predictive control for obstacle avoidance in a logistics scenario. A very good effort has been made to resolve the identified problem. Paper presentation also very good. However, the following suggestions are recommended:

       Add a literature review section after introduction section and compare your finding with already published research.

       Author said dynamic model to entire mathematical description so, what are the practical implementations of the model in real time?

       Results and Discussion; the author should compare the finding of the present study with the previous study and justify for more clarity.

       Would you explicitly specify the novelty of your work? What progress against the most recent state-of-the-art similar studies was made?

       Conclusions should be amended to incorporate a broader discussion of the significance and potential application of this specific study.

       English throughout the manuscript needs to be improved.

       Article is acceptable after minor changes

Author Response

Please, see the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop