Next Article in Journal
Air Pollution Monitoring via Wireless Sensor Networks: The Investigation and Correction of the Aging Behavior of Electrochemical Gaseous Pollutant Sensors
Next Article in Special Issue
A 5.9 GHz Channel Characterization at Railroad Crossings for Train-to-Infrastructure (T2I) Communications
Previous Article in Journal
Channel Allocation Algorithm Based on Swarm Intelligence for a Wireless Monitoring Network
Previous Article in Special Issue
PDDQN-HHVBF Routing Protocol Based on Empirical Priority DDQN to Improve HHVBF
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Motion Planning in UAV-Aided Data Collection with Dynamic Jamming

Electronics 2023, 12(8), 1841; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12081841
by Binbin Wu, Bangning Zhang, Wenfeng Ma *, Chen Xie, Daoxing Guo and Hao Jiang
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Electronics 2023, 12(8), 1841; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12081841
Submission received: 29 March 2023 / Revised: 5 April 2023 / Accepted: 6 April 2023 / Published: 13 April 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

An optimization-based approach is adopted in this work to solve the calculation of the minimum-energy path for an UAV, under the complex constraints of data-collection and obstacle avoidance. The authors propose a convex relaxation to find the path, which is further refined to avoid the obstacles and ultimately smoothing the trajectory.

The paper is scientifically sound and it is correctly presented. The results support the theoretical work and show improvement over other methods. There are a few minor issues to enhance the quality of the paper, which -I suggest next:

1) Though the theoretical computational complexity of the algorithm is given in the paper, what is a typical execution time for solving the calculations of the trajectory? Can this be done in real time?

2) While Fig. 7 suggests that data collection finishes in around 50 s, Figs. 8 and 10-14 use a time span of around 150 s for the time flight. Please, explain this more clearly.

Author Response

The authors would like to thank the editor and all of the reviewers for their helpful and insightful comments. We have improved the quality of the manuscript by carefully taking all the comments into account. The modifications in this revised manuscript as well as the response to the editors’ and reviewers’ comments are described in the pdf file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

see attachment

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

The authors would like to thank the editor and all of the reviewers for their helpful and insightful comments. We have improved the quality of the manuscript by carefully taking all the comments into account. The modifications in this revised manuscript as well as the response to the editors’ and reviewers’ comments are described in pdf file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop