Next Article in Journal
Research on Path Planning Method for Autonomous Patrol Robots
Previous Article in Journal
Double-Loop Controller Design of a Single-Phase 3-Level Power Factor Correction Converter
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhancing Software Code Vulnerability Detection Using GPT-4o and Claude-3.5 Sonnet: A Study on Prompt Engineering Techniques
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Investigating Digital Forensic Artifacts Generated from 3D Printing Slicing Software: Windows and Linux Analysis

1
Department of Computer Science, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX 77340, USA
2
School of Computing and Data Science, Wentworth Institute of Technology, Boston, MA 02115, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2024, 13(14), 2864; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142864 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 1 July 2024 / Revised: 17 July 2024 / Accepted: 17 July 2024 / Published: 20 July 2024

Abstract

Although Three-dimensional (3D) printers have legitimate applications in various fields, they also present opportunities for misuse by criminals who can infringe upon intellectual property rights, manufacture counterfeit medical products, or create unregulated and untraceable firearms. The rise of affordable 3D printers for general consumers has exacerbated these concerns, making it increasingly vital for digital forensics investigators to identify and analyze vital artifacts associated with 3D printing. In our study, we focus on the identification and analysis of digital forensic artifacts related to 3D printing stored in both Linux and Windows operating systems. We create five distinct scenarios and gather data, including random-access memory (RAM), configuration data, generated files, residual data, and network data, to identify when 3D printing occurs on a device. Furthermore, we utilize the 3D printing slicing software Ultimaker Cura version 5.7 and RepetierHost version 2.3.2 to complete our experiments. Additionally, we anticipate that criminals commonly engage in anti-forensics and recover valuable evidence after uninstalling the software and deleting all other evidence. Our analysis reveals that each data type we collect provides vital evidence relating to 3D printing forensics.
Keywords: 3D printing; digital forensics; forensic artifacts; G-code 3D printing; digital forensics; forensic artifacts; G-code

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Garland, L.; Neyaz, A.; Varol, C.; Shashidhar, N.K. Investigating Digital Forensic Artifacts Generated from 3D Printing Slicing Software: Windows and Linux Analysis. Electronics 2024, 13, 2864. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142864

AMA Style

Garland L, Neyaz A, Varol C, Shashidhar NK. Investigating Digital Forensic Artifacts Generated from 3D Printing Slicing Software: Windows and Linux Analysis. Electronics. 2024; 13(14):2864. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142864

Chicago/Turabian Style

Garland, Laura, Ashar Neyaz, Cihan Varol, and Narasimha K. Shashidhar. 2024. "Investigating Digital Forensic Artifacts Generated from 3D Printing Slicing Software: Windows and Linux Analysis" Electronics 13, no. 14: 2864. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142864

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop