Correction: Zhou et al. Computing Offloading Strategy in Mobile Edge Computing Environment: A Comparison between Adopted Frameworks, Challenges, and Future Directions. Electronics 2023, 12, 2452

In the original publication [1], the citation referring to reference 37 in the manuscript has been retracted. Concerns were raised on this matter, and the following reference was removed from the reference list:

Malarvizhi, N.; Aswini, J.; Sasikala, S.; Chakravarthy, M.H.; Neeba, E.A. Multi-parameter optimization for load balancing with effective task scheduling and resource sharing. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2021, 13, 75.

Due to the removal of reference [37], subsequent references and the corresponding citations in the main text have been adjusted to align with numerical order.

Table 1. Comparison of computer offloading schemes.

Algorithm	Ref.	Granularities	Objective	Research Contents
GWO	[35]	Full offloading	Delay & energy	Used GWO’s natural heuristic approach to achieve optimal solutions
ACO	[36]	Partial offloading	Energy	Proposed QoS based resource allocation and scheduling has used swarm-based ant colony optimization provide more predictable results
GA	[37]	Partial offloading	Energy	Proposed an adaptive particle swarm optimization algorithm based on genetic algorithm operator
Q-Learning	[38]	Partial offloading	Delay	Proposed a deep Q-learning based autonomic management framework
DRL	[39]	Partial offloading	Delay	Proposed a new DRL-based online computing offloading scheme that considers both blockchain data mining tasks and data processing tasks
FL & DRL	[40]	Partial offloading	Delay & energy	Proposed FL-combined DRL to optimize the computational offloading scheme and edge content cache in MEC system and adopt DDQN method
FL	[41]	Partial offloading	Delay & energy	Proposed a FL-based approach to train preference models while retaining user data on their personal devices

is also updated accordingly.

The authors clarify that the scientific conclusions remain unchanged despite the removal of reference 37 from the manuscript. They assert that references 38–40 sufficiently support their points, ensuring the integrity of their findings.

These corrections have been approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.