Next Article in Journal
Power Quality Assessment of Grid-Connected PV System in Compliance with the Recent Integration Requirements
Next Article in Special Issue
Design of a Low-Order FIR Filter for a High-Frequency Square-Wave Voltage Injection Method of the PMLSM Used in Maglev Train
Previous Article in Journal
Automatic Control and Model Verification for a Small Aileron-Less Hand-Launched Solar-Powered Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effective Position Control for a Three-Phase Motor
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Realization of the Sensorless Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive Control System with an Intelligent Controller

Electronics 2020, 9(2), 365; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9020365
by Hung-Khong Hoai 1,2, Seng-Chi Chen 1,* and Hoang Than 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Electronics 2020, 9(2), 365; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9020365
Submission received: 21 January 2020 / Revised: 17 February 2020 / Accepted: 18 February 2020 / Published: 21 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Control Systems for Electric Drives)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In my opinion, the paper shows poorly presented equations, with Chinese symbols on top of several equations throughout the document. A lot of them.


The title is too long and with acronyms not allowing us to understand what the work is when we read the paper title. In titles, acronyms that have not yet been defined should not be used.


Some figures are too small and do not allow full visibility and understanding. Also the figures and results explanation should be improved.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors present an interesting method, based on Neural Networks, for controlling a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor through a sensorless control algorithm. Regarding this paper I would like to make the following remarks.

I consider being fundamental for the authors to revise the multiple Chinese characters throughout the paper. It prevents the equations to be easily understood.

The authors should also define every abbreviation in their first use; e.g. PID in 58.

Furthermore, abbreviations should only be defined once; e.g. DSP in lines 32 and 64.

Finally, Conclusions section should include a deeper interpretation of the results, instead of rely solely on summarizing the achievements.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors improved the paper according reviewers suggestions.

Please remove the acronyms definitions from the keywords. Use only words as  keywords.

Back to TopTop