Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Volatile Organic Compounds in Mango Ginger (Curcuma amada Roxb.) from Myanmar
Next Article in Special Issue
Modelling hCDKL5 Heterologous Expression in Bacteria
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Tandem Mass Tag Labeling Method for Lipid Molecules Containing Carboxy and Phosphate Groups, and Their Stability in Human Serum
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Identifying Personalized Metabolic Signatures in Breast Cancer

Metabolites 2021, 11(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11010020
by Priyanka Baloni 1, Wikum Dinalankara 2,3, John C. Earls 1, Theo A. Knijnenburg 1, Donald Geman 4, Luigi Marchionni 2,3,* and Nathan D. Price 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Metabolites 2021, 11(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11010020
Submission received: 16 November 2020 / Revised: 23 December 2020 / Accepted: 28 December 2020 / Published: 30 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metabolic Modelling: Methods, Applications and Future Perspectives)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this study, Baloni et al used divergence analysis on gene expression data of 1156 breast normal and tumor samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and integrated this information with a genome-scale reconstruction of human metabolism to generate personalized, context-specific metabolic networks. This is an interesting study and the manuscript is clearly written. It provides useful information for the understanding of the metabolic differences between interpersonal heterogeneous cancer phenotypes.  As the connection between metabolism and epigenetic modifications plays an important role in the dysregulation of gene expression in cancers, I would suggest to show the correlation of metabolic and epigenetic signatures in normal and tumor samples.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a well-written manuscript and I thoroughly enjoyed reading it. It would be great if the authors elaborate on how these findings could be used in the real-world/clinic. Below are some additional comments that need to be addressed.

1) Line 3: correct spelling of cancer

2) Please update Figure 2A, 2B, and the figure legend.

3) Include references for Table 1

4) Table 1 please mention what does the drug treat.

5) Line 222, the authors mention they can predict drug effects, but it is not clear how and using what? please elaborate

6) Line 283, please check the reference 16. This might be a wrong reference

7) MG-132 is one of the potential anti-cancer drugs identified in this study. This drug is highly toxic to the normal cells if incubated for a long time at a particular concentration. I encourage the authors to discuss how they are going to filter a drug for its anti-cancer application based on what is currently known about that particular drug.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop