Next Article in Journal
MStractor: R Workflow Package for Enhancing Metabolomics Data Pre-Processing and Visualization
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Genotype-by-Environment Interactions of Chemical Composition of Raspberry by Using a Metabolomics Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identifying Personalized Metabolic Signatures in Breast Cancer
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Modelling hCDKL5 Heterologous Expression in Bacteria

Metabolites 2021, 11(8), 491; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11080491
by Marco Fondi 1,2,*, Stefano Gonzi 1, Mikolaj Dziurzynski 3, Paola Turano 4,5, Veronica Ghini 4,5, Marzia Calvanese 6, Andrea Colarusso 6,7, Concetta Lauro 6,7, Ermenegilda Parrilli 6 and Maria Luisa Tutino 6
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Metabolites 2021, 11(8), 491; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11080491
Submission received: 18 June 2021 / Revised: 22 July 2021 / Accepted: 23 July 2021 / Published: 28 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metabolic Modelling: Methods, Applications and Future Perspectives)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

No new physical insight is provided. The authors combine some well known reaction model and simulation already known to the field. I don't see any new physical insight in this study. Experimental design is poor. No direct evidence of optimized protein production as they have claimed. Some live cell protein expression imaging experiments are suggested. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript presented modelling hCDKL5 heterologous expression combined with experimental data in P. haloplanktis TAC125. Before the paper could be accepted for publication in Metabolitesrs need make revisions as follow:

  1. Conclusion section should be revised, and discussion contents are suggested to delete.
  2. The strategy for increasing hCDKL5 heterologous expression should be presented clearly.
  3. Modification (phosphorylation) and folding of hCDKL5 heterologous expression must be discussed.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors answered all my queries and concerns. The revised version looks much better to me. I don't have any other concern. 

Back to TopTop