Next Article in Journal
The Montevideo Interpretation: How the Inclusion of a Quantum Gravitational Notion of Time Solves the Measurement Problem
Previous Article in Journal
Dark Matter as Gravitational Solitons in the Weak Field Limit
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Inflationary Mechanism in Asymptotically Safe Gravity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial for the Special Issue “Quantum Fields—From Fundamental Concepts to Phenomenological Questions”

by
Astrid Eichhorn
1,†,
Roberto Percacci
2,3,† and
Frank Saueressig
4,*,†
1
CP3-Origins, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
2
International School for Advanced Studies, via Bonomea 265, 34136 Trieste, Italy
3
National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Sezione di Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy
4
Institute for Mathematics, Astrophysics and Particle Physics (IMAPP), Radboud University Nijmegen, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
All authors contributed equally to this work.
Universe 2020, 6(12), 235; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe6120235
Submission received: 2 December 2020 / Accepted: 6 December 2020 / Published: 10 December 2020
Quantum field theory and Einstein’s theory of general relativity are extremely successful in predicting the outcome of particle physics and gravitational experiments. For instance, precision experiments carried out in the realm of quantum electrodynamics show an agreement between measurements and theoretical predictions to a 10 digit precision. Moreover, the recent direct detection of gravitational waves by the LIGO-VIRGO collaboration as well as the first image of a black-hole shadow by the Event-Horizon-Telescope collaboration marked striking confirmations of general relativity. Based on theoretical considerations, it is generically expected that key concepts from quantum field theory must be brought together with the fundamental insights about the nature of gravity from general relativity, in order to provide a consistent description of our universe at all scales. At microscopic scales, matter exhibits quantum properties which are successfully accounted for by quantum field theory. As with classical matter, these quantum fluctuations gravitate and spacetime has to respond to these effects. This suggests that a proper description of spacetime and matter at small scales requires a quantum theory of gravity or, more ambitiously, a quantum model of spacetime.
A primary challenge in this line of research is that it is currently not clear which structures are the relevant ones for extending the present theoretical frameworks to and possibly beyond the Planck scale E Planck 10 18 GeV. As a consequence, the research area is subject to a constant inflow of exciting ideas which could be relevant for describing physics at these scales. This Special Issue reflects this broad range of concepts and ideas. It collects contributions from leading experts on topics related to quantum field theory, quantum spacetime, and quantum gravity with a specific focus on
  • renormalization group techniques in quantum gravity,
  • quantum field theory in curved and fractal spacetimes,
  • geometrical aspects of spacetime and quantum field theory.
The pivotal theme are ideas related to “Asymptotic Safety”, first proposed by Nobel Laureate Steven Weinberg [1,2]. In essence, this idea states that gravity could be formulated as a consistent and predictive quantum field theory by generalizing the idea of Asymptotic Freedom beyond the realm of perturbation theory. In this case, the dynamical principle underlying the predictivity for a quantum theory of geometry is quantum scale symmetry [3]. Intriguingly, progress along this research frontier may be the key to answer fundamental questions about the structure of space, time, and matter. Following the idea of “renormalizing the non-renormalizable”, this route may even allow for a unified description of all fundamental forces, including gravity, within the framework of renormalizable quantum field theories.
A central tool for the exploration of this territory are functional methods-based, e.g., on path integrals or functional renormalization group equations, complemented by lattice techniques as well as combinatorial, discrete methods. An indispensable tool in these investigations came with Martin Reuter’s adaptation of the functional renormalization group equation [4] for the effective average action, first developed in the context of gauge theories [5,6,7], to gravity. Since then, the program has made significant progress on the conceptual understanding of the asymptotic safety mechanism [8,9,10,11,12] as well as its phenomenological consequences for the structure of spacetime [13,14], particle physics [15], black holes [16,17,18], and cosmology [19]. Moreover, renormalization group ideas related to those that Martin Reuter pioneered in the context of asymptotically safe gravity are now also used to explore the properties of spacetime in other approaches to quantum gravity, including loop quantum gravity [20], Causal Dynamical Triangulations [21,22], tensor models [23], and group field theories [24]. The renormalization group is thereby starting to play an important role in linking different quantum-gravity approaches providing a common language in which distinct ideas on quantum spacetime can be discussed and compared. This Special Issue brings together an inspiring collection of research articles and reviews which reflects the wide scope of the research field, its current ideas, and future perspectives.
The Special Issue contains nine published manuscripts; six research articles and three reviews. The research articles (listed in chronological order of publication) focus on a wide range of open questions in quantum field theory, quantum gravity, and functional renormalization group techniques:
  • The Role of Riemann’s Zeta Function in Mathematics and Physics by Walter Dittrich [25], discusses Riemann’s impact on mathematics and physics using methods originating from number theory and quantum electrodynamics. Concretely, this is illustrated by using the Riemann zeta function to regularize the Heisenberg–Euler Lagrangian. As a by-product, the work explicitly evaluates various integrals that are useful in mathematics and physics.
  • Dimension and Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity by Steven Carlip
    citeCarlip:2019onx, reviews the concept of “dimension” in the context of quantum gravity. In many cases, operators on a fluctuating spacetime exhibit an anomalous scaling dimension that makes the theory effectively two-dimensional in a specific sense. By now, this was observed in several independent ways and in various different approaches to quantum gravity. The article offers a discussion of potential mechanisms that could explain the universality of this phenomenon. In the absence of direct observational tests of quantum gravity such common findings that arise almost universally in distinct quantum gravity approaches could provide an important guide to the development of a full-fledged theory of quantum gravity.
  • Anti-Newtonian Expansions and the Functional Renormalization Group by Max Niedermaier [26], introduces an Anti-Newtonian expansion scheme for scalar quantum field theories and classical gravity. This scheme employs a spatial gradient expansion in the sense that the limiting theory evolves only in time while the spatial points are dynamically decoupled. In scalar quantum field theories, the limiting system consists of copies of a self-interacting quantum mechanical system which produces an (in principle) exact solution of the functional renormalization group equation for the effective average action. In Einstein gravity, the anti-Newtonian limit has no dynamical spatial gradients, yet remains fully diffeomorphism invariant and propagates the original number of degrees of freedom. In this setting, the work constructs a canonical transformation which maps the ADM action to its anti-Newtonian limit. The prospects of further applications in the context of quantum gravity are discussed. Quite intriguingly, this setting might be linked to the idea of asymptotic silence arising close to spacetime singularities which has been proposed as a potential mechanism to generate dimensional reduction, as discussed above.
  • Holographic Formulation of 3D Metric Gravity with Finite Boundaries by Seth K. Asante, Bianca Dittrich and Florian Hopfmueller [27], constructs holographic boundary theories for linearized three-dimensional gravity, for a general family of finite or quasi-local boundaries. These boundary theories are directly derived from the dynamics of three-dimensional gravity by computing the effective action for a geometric boundary observable which measures the geodesic length from a given boundary point to some center in the bulk manifold. The general form for these boundary theories is shown to be Liouville-like with a coupling to the boundary Ricci scalar. The discussion of several examples offers interesting insights into the structure of holographic boundary theories. An important motivation for this line of research comes from considering renormalization group flows for spin-foam models. In this context, it is related to the identification of boundary observables which encode the bulk dynamics efficiently and lend themselves to which allow computing such renormalization group flows in practise.
  • On the Structure of the Vacuum in Quantum Gravity: A View from the Asymptotic Safety Scenario by Alfio Bonanno [28], investigates the vacuum state underlying the gravitational asymptotic safety scenario. It is demonstrated that higher derivative operators, commonly expected in this scenario, may generate additional degrees of freedom which render the standard vacuum unstable. When this happens, translation and rotational symmetries can be spontaneously broken and the effective action may give rise to a vacuum state corresponding to a “kinetic condensate”. In this scenario, the vacuum state of gravity may then be given by the gravitational analogue to the Savvidy vacuum in Quantum Chromo-Dynamics (QCD). This line of research highlights how a change in the microscopic gravitational dynamics could address the long-standing conformal factor instability in Euclidean Einstein gravity.
  • The Inflationary Mechanism in Asymptotically Safe Gravity by Alessia Platania [29], reviews the implications of Asymptotic Safety in the cosmological context. Specifically, the work analyzes a toy model exemplifying how the departure from quantum scale invariance could explain the approximate scale-invariance observed in the power spectrum of temperature fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background. In a broader phenomenological context, this constitutes an explicit example of how quantum gravity might provide a first-principles explanation for free parameters appearing in the effective field theory framework—both in cosmology and in particle physics. In the case of inflation, Asymptotic Safety may naturally provide inflationary potentials from the gravitational dynamics without the need to introduce a scalar field with an ad-hoc potential by hand [30].
The three review articles of the Special Issue focus on the following:
  • Vacuum Effective Actions and Mass-Dependent Renormalization in Curved Space by Sebastián A. Franchino-Viñas, Tibério de Paula Netto and Omar Zanusso, ref. [31], reviews results on the non-local form factors entering the effective action of semiclassical gravity in two and four dimensions. The relevant contributions are computed by means of a covariant expansion of the heat kernel up to the second order in the spacetime curvature. The result highlights the importance of the form factors in determining the momentum-dependence of Newton’s constant and the other gravitational couplings in Wilsonian renormalization group computations.
  • Geometric Operators in the Einstein–Hilbert Truncation by Maximilian Becker and Carlo Pagani, ref. [32], reviews the composite operator formalism for the effective average action. Subsequently, the method is used to estimate the anomalous scaling properties of geometric operators, such as the geodesic length and the volume of hypersurfaces, in the context of the gravitational Asymptotic Safety program. The results provide several extensions of previous studies. As a future perspective, this line of research provides additional characterizations of the effective spacetime geometry beyond the dimensional estimators reviewed, e.g., in [14]. In particular, it provides tools to further test the conjecture of dynamical dimensional reduction in quantum gravity.
  • Multi-Critical Multi-Field Models: A CFT Approach to the Leading Order by Gian Paolo Vacca, Alessandro Codello, Mahmoud Safari and Omar Zanusso, ref. [33], reviews some general results for the multi-critical multi-field models in d > 2 , recently obtained using conformal field theory and Schwinger–Dyson methods at the perturbative level [34,35]. Results in the leading non-trivial order are derived consistently for several conformal field theories and found to be in agreement with functional renormalization group methods. The prospects for investigating mechanisms like emergent (possibly approximate) symmetries in this framework are outlined. The characterization of the corresponding scale-invariant theories provides blueprints for fixed-point mechanisms that could also be active in a gravitational setting. In particular, the approach taken in this work may lead to a better understanding of the Reuter universality class underlying the gravitational asymptotic safety scenario in the future.
In its broad scope, the present collection of articles highlights several attractive points about the gravitational asymptotic safety scenario, which owes much to the pioneering work by Martin Reuter [4,36,37,38,39,40]. Currently, the approach has become a focal point of quantum gravity research, that it has enriched with new questions, concepts and techniques. From a phenomenological viewpoint, the fact that Asymptotic Safety may explain assumptions made within an effective-field-theory setting makes the approach very attractive for developing (beyond) the Standard Model particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmological scenarios. The methodological link to conformal field theory implies that insights and methods can be transferred between the physically rather distinct realms of quantum gravity and condensed matter/statistical physics, providing a fruitful cross-fertilization between these research areas.

Funding

The editors acknowledge financial support through the MITP workshop grant “Quantum Fields—from Fundamental Concepts to Phenomenological Questions” which allowed them to organize the event where the ideas presented in this Special Issue have been discussed.

Acknowledgments

The editors are grateful to M. Reuter for countless stimulating discussions. Moreover, they thank all authors for their contributions and the reviewers for their constructive reports. Furthermore, we thank the Mainz Institute for Theoretical Physics (MITP) for hospitality during the topical workshop “Quantum Fields—from Fundamental Concepts to Phenomenological Questions” where many ideas related to this Special Issue were discussed.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Weinberg, S. Critical Phenomena for Field Theorists. Erice Subnucl. Phys. 1976, 14, 1. [Google Scholar]
  2. Weinberg, S. Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theories of gravitation. In General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey; Hawking, S.W., Israel, W., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1979; pp. 790–831. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wetterich, C. Quantum scale symmetry. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1901.04741. [Google Scholar]
  4. Reuter, M. Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D 1998, 57, 971–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Wetterich, C. Exact evolution equation for the effective potential. Phys. Lett. B 1993, 301, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Morris, T.R. The Exact renormalization group and approximate solutions. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1994, 9, 2411–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Reuter, M.; Wetterich, C. Effective average action for gauge theories and exact evolution equations. Nucl. Phys. B 1994, 417, 181–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Reuter, M.; Saueressig, F. Quantum Einstein Gravity. New J. Phys. 2012, 14, 055022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Percacci, R. An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety; 100 Years of General Relativity; World Scientific: Singapore, 2017; Volume 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Reuter, M.; Saueressig, F. Quantum Gravity and the Functional Renormalization Group; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. Pawlowski, J.M.; Reichert, M. Quantum gravity: A fluctuating point of view. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2007.10353. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bonanno, A.; Eichhorn, A.; Gies, H.; Pawlowski, J.M.; Percacci, R.; Reuter, M.; Saueressig, F.; Vacca, G.P. Critical reflections on asymptotically safe gravity. Front. Phys. 2020, 8, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Reuter, M.; Saueressig, F. Asymptotic Safety, Fractals, and Cosmology. Lect. Notes Phys. 2013, 863, 185–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Carlip, S. Dimension and Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity. Universe 2019, 5, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Eichhorn, A. An asymptotically safe guide to quantum gravity and matter. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 2019, 5, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Koch, B.; Saueressig, F. Black holes within Asymptotic Safety. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2014, 29, 1430011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Pawlowski, J.M.; Stock, D. Quantum-improved Schwarzschild-(A)dS and Kerr-(A)dS spacetimes. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 98, 106008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Platania, A. Dynamical renormalization of black-hole spacetimes. Eur. Phys. J. C 2019, 79, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bonanno, A.; Saueressig, F. Asymptotically safe cosmology—A status report. C. R. Phys. 2017, 18, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dittrich, B.; Schnetter, E.; Seth, C.J.; Steinhaus, S. Coarse graining flow of spin foam intertwiners. Phys. Rev. D 2016, 94, 124050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ambjorn, J.; Goerlich, A.; Jurkiewicz, J.; Loll, R. Nonperturbative Quantum Gravity. Phys. Rept. 2012, 519, 127–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Loll, R. Quantum Gravity from Causal Dynamical Triangulations: A Review. Class. Quant. Grav. 2020, 37, 013002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Eichhorn, A.; Koslowski, T.; Pereira, A.D. Status of background-independent coarse-graining in tensor models for quantum gravity. Universe 2019, 5, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Carrozza, S. Flowing in Group Field Theory Space: A Review. Symmetry Integr. Geom. Methods Appl. 2016, 12, 070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Dittrich, W. The Role of Riemann’s Zeta Function in Mathematics and Physics. Universe 2019, 5, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Niedermaier, M. Anti-Newtonian Expansions and the Functional Renormalization Group. Universe 2019, 5, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Asante, S.K.; Dittrich, B.; Hopfmueller, F. Holographic formulation of 3D metric gravity with finite boundaries. Universe 2019, 5, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Bonanno, A. On the Structure of the Vacuum in Quantum Gravity: A View from the Asymptotic Safety Scenario. Universe 2019, 5, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Platania, A. The inflationary mechanism in Asymptotically Safe Gravity. Universe 2019, 5, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gubitosi, G.; Ooijer, R.; Ripken, C.; Saueressig, F. Consistent early and late time cosmology from the RG flow of gravity. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2018, 1812, 004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Franchino-Viñas, S.A.; de Paula Netto, T.; Zanusso, O. Vacuum effective actions and mass-dependent renormalization in curved space. Universe 2019, 5, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Becker, M.; Pagani, C. Geometric Operators in the Einstein–Hilbert Truncation. Universe 2019, 5, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Vacca, G.; Codello, A.; Safari, M.; Zanusso, O. Multi-critical multi-field models: A CFT approach to the leading order. Universe 2019, 5, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Codello, A.; Safari, M.; Vacca, G.P.; Zanusso, O. New universality class in three dimensions: The critical Blume-Capel model. Phys. Rev. D 2017, 96, 081701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Codello, A.; Safari, M.; Vacca, G.P.; Zanusso, O. Leading order CFT analysis of multi-scalar theories in d > 2. Eur. Phys. J. C 2019, 79, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Bonanno, A.; Reuter, M. Renormalization group improved black hole space-times. Phys. Rev. D 2000, 62, 043008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Bonanno, A.; Reuter, M. Cosmology of the Planck era from a renormalization group for quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D 2002, 65, 043508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Reuter, M.; Saueressig, F. Renormalization group flow of quantum gravity in the Einstein-Hilbert truncation. Phys. Rev. D 2002, 65, 065016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lauscher, O.; Reuter, M. Flow equation of quantum Einstein gravity in a higher derivative truncation. Phys. Rev. D 2002, 66, 025026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Lauscher, O.; Reuter, M. Fractal spacetime structure in asymptotically safe gravity. J. High Energy Phys. 2005, 10, 050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Eichhorn, A.; Percacci, R.; Saueressig, F. Editorial for the Special Issue “Quantum Fields—From Fundamental Concepts to Phenomenological Questions”. Universe 2020, 6, 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe6120235

AMA Style

Eichhorn A, Percacci R, Saueressig F. Editorial for the Special Issue “Quantum Fields—From Fundamental Concepts to Phenomenological Questions”. Universe. 2020; 6(12):235. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe6120235

Chicago/Turabian Style

Eichhorn, Astrid, Roberto Percacci, and Frank Saueressig. 2020. "Editorial for the Special Issue “Quantum Fields—From Fundamental Concepts to Phenomenological Questions”" Universe 6, no. 12: 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe6120235

APA Style

Eichhorn, A., Percacci, R., & Saueressig, F. (2020). Editorial for the Special Issue “Quantum Fields—From Fundamental Concepts to Phenomenological Questions”. Universe, 6(12), 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe6120235

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop