Next Article in Journal
A Correction Algorithm of the Sampling Effect and Its Application in High-Precision Astrometry
Next Article in Special Issue
Ricci Soliton and Certain Related Metrics on a Three-Dimensional Trans-Sasakian Manifold
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling of the Wind/Disk Outflow from Be Stars II: Formation of the Keplerian Disk
Previous Article in Special Issue
Two Analytical Schemes for the Optical Soliton Solution of the (2 + 1) Hirota–Maccari System Observed in Single-Mode Fibers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Construction of Exact Solutions for Gilson–Pickering Model Using Two Different Approaches

by
Hamood Ur Rehman
1,
Aziz Ullah Awan
2,*,
ElSayed M. Tag-ElDin
3,
Uzma Bashir
1 and
Seham Ayesh Allahyani
4
1
Department of Mathematics, University of Okara, Okara 56130, Pakistan
2
Department of Mathematics, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54590, Pakistan
3
Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo 11835, Egypt
4
Department of Mathematics, Jamoum University College, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca 24382, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Universe 2022, 8(11), 592; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8110592
Submission received: 2 August 2022 / Revised: 10 October 2022 / Accepted: 12 October 2022 / Published: 8 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Optical Soliton Perturbation)

Abstract

:
In this paper, the extended simple equation method (ESEM) and the generalized Riccati equation mapping (GREM) method are applied to the nonlinear third-order Gilson–Pickering (GP) model to obtain a variety of new exact wave solutions. With the suitable selection of parameters involved in the model, some familiar physical governing models such as the Camassa–Holm (CH) equation, the Fornberg–Whitham (FW) equation, and the Rosenau–Hyman (RH) equation are obtained. The graphical representation of solutions under different constraints shows the dark, bright, combined dark–bright, periodic, singular, and kink soliton. For the graphical representation, 3D plots, contour plots, and 2D plots of some acquired solutions are illustrated. The obtained wave solutions motivate researchers to enhance their theories to the best of their capacities and to utilize the outcomes in other nonlinear cases. The executed methods are shown to be practical and straightforward for approaching the considered equation and may be utilized to study abundant types of NLEEs arising in physics, engineering, and applied sciences.

1. Introduction

Differential equations in our daily lives govern many physical phenomena. In particular, nonlinear partial differential equations (NLPDEs) play a vital role in nonlinear science. Several natural wonders appear in biological and applied studies, such as fluid mechanics, hydrodynamics, mathematical physics, optics, birefringent fibers, elastic media, chemical reactions, cosmology, ecology, quantum mechanics, geology, plasma physics, wave propagation, and shallow water, can be interpreted by NLPDEs [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12].
Researchers, mathematicians, and physicists have worked on NLPDEs for many decades due to their wide range of applications in daily life. For the last few decades, NLPDEs have been a vital matter of contention for exploration. As we know that natural physical phenomena are complex in nature, to illustrate the diverse quantitative and qualitative exposures of NLPDEs, numerous mathematical approaches have been invented and explained in the literature, such as the extended hyperbolic function method [13], Sardar subequation method [14,15], ϕ 6 model expansion techniques [16], e x p ( ϕ ( ξ ) ) expansion, first integral and Sin–Gordon methods [17], ( G / G ) expansion method [18], extended auxiliary equation method [19], generalized Kudryashov method [20], tanh method [21], extended simple equation method [22,23], generalized Riccati equation mapping method [24], modified F expansion method [25], etc. A direct approach for the exact solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations (NLPDEs) has been suggested by using the rational function transformation [26], applying Bäcklund transformations of the linear form [27], Hirota’s bilinear method [28] as a mathematical tool for the systematic and computational approach to the soliton solutions of NLPDEs, the improved Hirota bilinear method (HBM) [29], a double subequation method [30] for constructing complexion solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations (NLPDEs), and refinements of the transformation of inequalities for zero-balanced hypergeometric functions [31].
The Gilson–Pickering model is of supreme value due to its unique characteristic of providing the foundation for different governed models, also discussed for specific values of the parameters. The bifurcation behavior of the GP model [32] has a certain curiosity to investigate and explore its salient features through some analytical approaches, which has not been considered before in the literature.
The primary purpose behind the research in this paper is to explore the variety of exact and advanced solutions of the Gilson–Pickering equation using two different analytical approaches, i.e., the extended simple equation method (ESEM) [22,23] and the generalized Riccati equation mapping (GREM) method [24]. These methods are vital in finding exact solutions for NLEEs in engineering and mathematical physics. We keenly focus on the fundamental role of the proposed methods to establish the new families of accurate solutions following the nonlinear third-order Gilson–Pickering equation [32].
q t + 2 α q x β q q x γ q x q x x ω q x x t ε q q x x x = 0 ,
where α , β , γ , ω , and ε are constants. The following governed physical models are associated with the suitable selection of parameters α , β :
When α = 0.5 , β = 1 , γ = 3 , ω = 1 , Equation (1) is transformed into the Fornberg–Whitham (FW) equation [33,34], i.e.,
q t + q x + q q x 3 q x q x x q x x t ε q q x x x = 0 .
When α = 0 , β = 1 , γ = 3 , ω = 0 , Equation (1) converts into the Rosenau–Hyman equation [35,36], i.e.,
q t q q x 3 q x q x x ε q q x x = 0 .
When β = 1 , γ = 2 , ω = 1 , Equation (1) becomes the Fuchssteiner–Fokas–Camassa–Holm (FFCH) equation [37,38] as
q t + 2 α q x + q q x 2 q x q x x q x x t ε q q x x x = 0 .
This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 addresses the methodology of the ESEM. In Section 3, the description of the GREM method is given. Section 4 discusses the application of the ESEM to the GP equation, and Section 5 presents the solutions of the GP equation by using the GREM method. Section 6 explains the physical interpretation of some solutions. Finally, in Section 7, the conclusion is presented.

2. Methodology of Extended Simple Equation Method

To solve Equation (1), the following steps are used:
Step 1: 
Let the PDE have the form
Q 1 ( v , v x x , v x z , v x t , v x y , v x t t , ) = 0 .
Step 2: 
Consider the wave transformation:
v = V ( ϱ ) , ϱ = x ϵ t ,
which transforms PDE (5) into the following ODE:
Q 2 ( V , V , V , ) = 0 .
Step 3: 
Consider that Equation (7) has a solution of the form
R ( ϱ ) = j = N N A j Φ j ( ϱ ) .
Step 4: 
Let Φ satisfy the DE of the form
Φ = c 0 + c 1 Φ + c 2 Φ 2 + c 3 Φ 3 .
Step 5: 
Equation (9) has the following solutions [22,23]:
If c 3 = 0 ,
Φ ( ϱ ) = c 1 4 c 0 c 2 c 1 2 tan ( 4 c 0 c 2 c 1 2 2 ( ϱ + ϱ 0 ) ) 2 c 2 , 4 c 0 c 2 > c 1 2 .
If c 0 = 0 , c 3 = 0 , then
Φ = c 1 e c 1 ( ϱ + ϱ 0 ) 1 c 2 e c 1 ( ϱ + ϱ 0 ) , c 1 > 0 ,
Φ = c 1 e c 1 ( ϱ + ϱ 0 ) 1 + c 2 e c 1 ( ϱ + ϱ 0 ) , c 1 < 0 .
If c 1 = 0 , c 3 = 0 , then
Φ = c 0 c 2 c 2 tan ( c 0 c 2 ( ϱ + ϱ 0 ) ) , c 0 c 2 > 0 ,
Φ = c 0 c 2 c 2 tanh ( c 0 c 2 ( ϱ + ϱ 0 ) ) , c 0 c 2 < 0 .
Using Equation (8) with Equation (9) in Equation (7) and after simplification, the values of the constant parameters are found. Taking these constants and the Φ ( ϱ ) values in Equation (8), we obtain the solution of Equation (5).

3. Methodology of Generalized Riccati Equation Mapping Method

In this method, the first two steps are same as in the ESEM.
Step 3: 
Let the solution for Equation (7) have the form
Q ( ϱ ) = a 0 + j = 1 N a j Φ j ( ϱ ) + j = 1 N b j Φ j ( ϱ ) .
Let Φ ( ϱ ) satisfy the DE:
Φ = u + v Φ + w Φ 2 ,
where u, v, and w are arbitrary constants. Using Equation (15) with Equation (16) in Equation (7) and comparing all the coefficients of Φ imply a system of equations, from which the constants involved in the supposed solution (15) are determined. Taking these obtained values of the constants with the following known solutions of the generalized Riccati Equation (16), the soliton solutions for ODE (7) can be easily calculated.
The following twenty-seven solutions of Equation (16) are used for ODE (7).
Type 1: 
When v 2 4 u w > 0 and v w or u w 0 , the solutions of Equation (16) are given as
Φ 1 = v 2 4 u w tanh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w + v 2 w , Φ 2 = v 2 4 u w coth 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w + v 2 w , Φ 3 = v 2 4 u w tanh ϱ v 2 4 u w ± isech ϱ v 2 4 u w + v 2 w , Φ 4 = v 2 4 u w coth ϱ v 2 4 u w ± csc h ϱ v 2 4 u w + v 2 w , Φ 5 = v 2 4 u w tanh 1 4 ϱ v 2 4 u w ± coth 1 4 ϱ v 2 4 u w + 2 v 4 w , Φ 6 = A 2 + B 2 v 2 4 u w A v 2 4 u w cosh ϱ v 2 4 u w A sinh ϱ v 2 4 u w + B v 2 w , Φ 7 = B 2 A 2 v 2 4 u w + A v 2 4 u w cosh ϱ v 2 4 u w A sinh ϱ v 2 4 u w + B v 2 w ,
where A and B are two non-zero real constants that satisfy B 2 A 2 > 0 .
Φ 8 = 2 u cosh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w v 2 4 u w sinh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w v cosh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w , Φ 9 = 2 u sinh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w v sinh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w v 2 4 u w cosh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w , Φ 10 = 2 u cosh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w v 2 4 u w sinh ϱ v 2 4 u w v cosh ϱ v 2 4 u w ± i v 2 4 u w , Φ 11 = 2 u sinh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w v 2 4 u w cosh ϱ v 2 4 u w ± v 2 4 u w v sinh ϱ v 2 4 u w ,
Φ 12 = 4 u sinh 1 4 ϱ v 2 4 u w cosh 1 4 ϱ v 2 4 u w ( 2 v 2 4 u w cos h 2 1 4 ϱ v 2 4 u w 2 v sinh 1 4 ϱ v 2 4 u w cosh 1 4 ϱ v 2 4 u w v 2 4 u w .
Type 2: 
When v 2 4 u w < 0 and v w or u w 0 , the solutions of Equation (16) are given as
Φ 13 = 4 u w v 2 tan 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 v 2 w , Φ 14 = 4 u w v 2 cot 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 + v 2 w , Φ 15 = 4 u w v 2 tan ϱ 4 u w v 2 ± sec ϱ 4 u w v 2 v 2 w , Φ 16 = 4 u w v 2 cot ϱ 4 u w v 2 ± csc ϱ 4 u w v 2 + v 2 w , Φ 17 = 4 u w v 2 tan 1 4 ϱ 4 u w v 2 coth 1 4 ϱ 4 u w v 2 2 v 4 w , Φ 18 = ± A 2 B 2 4 u w v 2 A 4 u w v 2 cos ϱ 4 u w v 2 A sinh ϱ 4 u w v 2 + B v 2 w , Φ 19 = ± A 2 B 2 4 u w v 2 + A 4 u w v 2 cos ϱ 4 u w v 2 A sin ϱ 4 u w v 2 + B v 2 w ,
where A and B are two non-zero real constants that satisfy A 2 B 2 > 0 .
Φ 20 = 2 u cos 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 4 u w v 2 sin 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 + v cos 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 , Φ 21 = 2 u sin 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 4 u w v 2 cos 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 v sin 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 , Φ 22 = 2 u cos 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 4 u w v 2 sin ϱ 4 u w v 2 + v cos 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 ± 4 u w v 2 , Φ 23 = 2 u sin 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 4 u w v 2 cos ϱ 4 u w v 2 ± 4 u w v 2 v sin ϱ 4 u w v 2 ,
Φ 24 = 4 u sin 1 4 ϱ 4 u w v 2 cos 1 4 ϱ 4 u w v 2 2 4 u w v 2 cos 2 ϱ 1 4 4 u w v 2 2 v sin 1 4 ϱ 4 u w v 2 cos 1 4 ϱ 4 u w v 2 4 u w v 2 .
Type 3: 
When u = 0 and w v 0 , the solutions of Equation (16) are given as
Φ 25 = v . d w ( d sinh ( v . ϱ ) + cosh ( v . ϱ ) ) , Φ 26 = v ( sinh ( v ϱ ) + cosh ( v ϱ ) ) w ( d + sinh ( v ϱ ) + cosh ( v ϱ ) ) ,
where d is an arbitrary constant.
Type 4: 
When w 0 and u = v = 0 , the only solution of Equation (16) is
Φ 27 = 1 w ϱ + c ,
where c is an arbitrary constant.
Using the transformation given in Equation (6) in Equation (1), we have
( 2 α ϵ ) Q + ω ϵ Q ϵ Q Q β Q Q γ Q Q = 0 .
Integrating Equation (17) once, we obtain
ε Q Q + ω ϵ Q + 1 2 ( ϵ γ ) ( Q ) 2 + ( 2 α ϵ ) Q 1 2 β Q 2 = L ,
where L is the constant of integration. Balancing between the highest derivative and the nonlinear term, Equation (18) provides M = 2 .

4. Application of Extended Simple Equation Method

In this section, the extended simple equation method is applied to derive the solution of Equation (1).
Let the general form of the solution of Equation (18) be
Q ( ϱ ) = A 2 Φ ( ϱ ) 2 + A 1 Φ ( ϱ ) + A 2 Φ ( ϱ ) 2 + A 1 Φ ( ϱ ) + A 0 .
Using Equation (19) with Equation (9) in Equation (18) and after simplification, the following cases arise:
Case 1: 
If c 3 = 0 , 4 c 0 c 2 c 1 2 > 0 .
Family-I:
L = A 0 c 1 A 1 c 2 A 1 β c 1 2 + 6 A 0 β c 0 c 1 2 A 1 β c 0 c 2 + A 1 c 1 4 ε 8 A 1 c 0 c 2 c 1 2 ε + 16 A 1 c 0 2 c 2 2 ε 12 c 0 c 1 2 , A 2 = A 1 c 0 c 1 , A 1 = 0 , A 2 = 0 , ω = A 1 β + A 1 c 1 2 ( ε ) + 12 A 0 c 0 c 1 ε 8 A 1 c 0 c 2 ε 12 c 0 c 1 ϵ , γ = 2 ε , α = A 1 β c 1 2 + 12 A 0 β c 0 c 1 8 A 1 β c 0 c 2 + A 1 c 1 4 ε 8 A 1 c 0 c 2 c 1 2 ε + 16 A 1 c 0 2 c 2 2 ε + 12 c 0 c 1 ϵ 24 c 0 c 1 .
Q 1 = 4 A 1 c 0 c 2 2 c 1 c 1 4 c 0 c 2 c 1 2 tan 1 2 4 c 0 c 2 c 1 2 ϱ + ϱ 0 2 + A 0 2 A 1 c 2 c 1 4 c 0 c 2 c 1 2 tan 1 2 4 c 0 c 2 c 1 2 ϱ + ϱ 0 .
Family-II:
L = β A 0 2 c 2 A 1 A 0 c 1 + A 1 2 c 0 2 c 2 , ω = A 1 β c 1 2 A 0 β c 2 2 c 2 c 1 2 4 c 0 c 2 ϵ , ε = β c 1 2 4 c 0 c 2 , A 2 = 0 , A 1 = 0 , A 2 = 0 , γ = 3 β c 1 2 4 c 0 c 2 , α = A 1 ( β ) c 1 + 2 A 0 β c 2 + 2 c 2 ϵ 4 c 2 .
Q 2 = A 0 A 1 c 1 4 c 0 c 2 c 1 2 tan 1 2 4 c 0 c 2 c 1 2 ϱ + ϱ 0 2 c 2 .
Family-III:
L = β A 1 2 c 2 A 0 A 1 c 1 + A 0 2 c 0 2 c 0 , ω = β 2 A 0 c 0 A 1 c 1 8 c 0 2 c 2 ϵ 2 c 0 c 1 2 ϵ , ε = β c 1 2 4 c 0 c 2 , A 1 = 0 , A 2 = 0 , A 2 = 0 , γ = 3 β c 1 2 4 c 0 c 2 , α = 2 A 0 β c 0 A 1 β c 1 + 2 c 0 ϵ 4 c 0 .
Q 3 = A 0 2 A 1 c 2 c 1 4 c 0 c 2 c 1 2 tan 1 2 4 c 0 c 2 c 1 2 ϱ + ϱ 0 .
Case 2: 
If c 0 = 0 , c 3 = 0 .
Family-I:
L = 1 2 A 1 c 2 A 0 c 1 3 A 0 c 1 ε + 3 A 1 c 2 ε + 2 c 1 ω ϵ , A 2 = 0 , A 1 = 0 , A 2 = 0 , β = c 1 2 ε , α = 1 2 2 A 0 c 1 2 ε 2 A 1 c 2 c 1 ε + c 1 2 ω ( ϵ ) + ϵ , γ = 2 ε
Q 4 = A 1 e c 1 ϱ + ϱ 0 1 c 2 e c 1 ϱ + ϱ 0 c 1 + A 0 , c 1 > 0 .
Q 5 = A 0 A 1 e c 1 ϱ + ϱ 0 c 2 e c 1 ϱ + ϱ 0 + 1 c 1 , c 1 < 0 .
Family-II:
L = 1 2 A 1 c 2 2 A 0 c 1 6 A 0 c 1 ε + 3 A 1 c 2 ε + 4 c 1 ω ϵ , A 2 = A 1 c 1 2 c 2 , A 1 = 0 , A 2 = 0 , α = 1 2 8 A 0 c 1 2 ε 4 A 1 c 2 c 1 ε 4 c 1 2 ω ϵ + ϵ , β = 4 c 1 2 ε , γ = 2 ε .
Q 6 = A 1 e c 1 ϱ + ϱ 0 1 c 2 e c 1 ϱ + ϱ 0 c 1 A 0
+ A 1 e 2 c 1 ϱ + ϱ 0 1 c 2 e c 1 ϱ + ϱ 0 2 2 c 1 c 2 , c 1 > 0 . Q 7 = A 1 e 2 c 1 ϱ + ϱ 0 c 2 e c 1 ϱ + ϱ 0 + 1 2 2 c 1 c 2
A 1 e c 1 ϱ + ϱ 0 c 2 e c 1 ϱ + ϱ 0 + 1 c 1 + A 0 , c 1 < 0 .
Family-III:
L = 8 A 0 2 c 1 2 c 2 ε A 0 A 1 c 1 3 ε 4 c 2 , α = A 1 c 1 3 ( ε ) + 16 A 0 c 2 c 1 2 ε + 4 c 2 ϵ 8 c 2 , A 1 = 0 , A 2 = 0 , A 2 = A 1 c 2 c 1 , β = 4 c 1 2 ε , γ = 2 ε , ω = ε A 1 c 1 + 4 A 0 c 2 4 c 2 ϵ .
Q 8 = A 1 c 1 c 2 e 2 c 1 ϱ + ϱ 0 1 c 2 e c 1 ϱ + ϱ 0 2 + A 0 + A 1 c 1 e c 1 ϱ + ϱ 0 1 c 2 e c 1 ϱ + ϱ 0 , c 1 > 0 .
Q 9 = A 1 c 1 c 2 e 2 c 1 ϱ + ϱ 0 c 2 e c 1 ϱ + ϱ 0 + 1 2 + A 0 A 1 c 1 e c 1 ϱ + ϱ 0 c 2 e c 1 ϱ + ϱ 0 + 1 , c 1 < 0 .
Case 3: 
If c 3 = 0 , c 1 = 0 .
Family-I:
L = 2 A 0 2 c 0 c 2 ε + A 1 2 c 0 2 ε , α = 1 2 4 A 0 c 0 c 2 ε + ϵ , ω = A 0 ε ϵ , A 2 = 0 , A 1 = 0 , A 2 = 0 , γ = 3 ε , β = 4 c 0 c 2 ε .
Q 10 = A 1 c 0 c 2 tan c 0 c 2 ϱ + ϱ 0 c 2 + A 0 , c 0 c 2 > 0 .
Q 11 = A 0 A 1 c 0 c 2 tanh c 0 c 2 ϱ + ϱ 0 c 2 , c 0 c 2 < 0 .
Family-II:
A 2 = 0 , L = 8 A 0 2 c 0 c 2 ε + 4 A 1 2 c 0 2 ε , α = 1 2 16 A 0 c 0 c 2 ε + ϵ , A 2 = 0 , A 1 = A 1 c 0 c 2 , γ = 3 ε , β = 16 c 0 c 2 ε , ω = A 0 ε ϵ .
Q 12 = A 0 A 1 c 0 cot c 0 c 2 ϱ + ϱ 0 c 0 c 2
+ A 1 c 0 c 2 tan c 0 c 2 ϱ + ϱ 0 c 2 , c 0 c 2 > 0 . Q 13 = A 0 + A 1 c 0 coth c 0 c 2 ϱ + ϱ 0 c 0 c 2
A 1 c 0 c 2 tanh c 0 c 2 ϱ + ϱ 0 c 2 , c 0 c 2 < 0 .
Family-III:
L = 4 A 0 2 c 0 c 2 ε , α = 1 2 ϵ 8 A 0 c 0 c 2 ε , γ = 3 ε , A 2 = 0 , A 1 = A 1 c 0 c 2 , A 2 = 0 , β = 8 c 0 c 2 ε , ω = A 0 ε ϵ .
Q 14 = A 0 + A 1 c 0 cot c 0 c 2 ϱ + ϱ 0 c 0 c 2
+ A 1 c 0 c 2 tan c 0 c 2 ϱ + ϱ 0 c 2 , c 0 c 2 > 0 . Q 15 = A 0 A 1 c 0 coth c 0 c 2 ϱ + ϱ 0 c 0 c 2
A 1 c 0 c 2 tanh c 0 c 2 ϱ + ϱ 0 c 2 , c 0 c 2 < 0 .

5. Application of Generalized Riccati Equation Mapping Method:

We have the general form of the solution of Equation (18):
Q ( ϱ ) = a 2 Φ 2 + a 1 Φ + a 0 + b 2 Φ 2 + b 1 Φ .
Suppose Φ ( ϱ ) satisfies the DE:
Φ ( ϱ ) = u + v Φ + w Φ 2 .
Using Equation (44) along with Equation (45) in Equation (18) and after simplification for the constants, we obtain
L = a 0 v a 1 u 2 a 1 v 2 ω ϵ 12 a 0 2 ε v w + 12 a 0 v w ω ϵ 2 a 1 v a 0 v a 1 u 3 a 1 2 ε u v + 12 a 0 a 1 ε u w + 4 a 1 u w ω ϵ + 3 a 0 a 1 ε v 2 2 a 1 v , α = a 1 v 3 ω ( ϵ ) 12 a 0 2 ε v 2 w + 12 a 0 v 2 w ω ϵ + a 1 v ϵ 2 a 1 v 4 a 1 2 ε u 2 w 2 a 1 2 ε u v 2 + 16 a 0 a 1 ε u v w + 8 a 1 u v w ω ϵ + 2 a 0 a 1 ε v 3 2 a 1 v , β = 8 a 1 ε u w + a 1 ε v 2 12 a 0 ε v w + 12 v w ω ϵ a 1 , γ = 2 ε .
Now, taking these constant values and depending on the solutions of Equation (45), the following new soliton wave solutions are obtained:
Type 1: 
When v 2 4 u w > 0 and v w or u w 0 , the solutions of Equation (18) are
Q 16 = a 1 v 2 4 u w tanh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w + v 2 4 v w a 1 v 2 4 u w tanh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w + v 2 w + a 0 , Q 17 = a 1 v 2 4 u w coth 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w + v 2 4 v w a 1 v 2 4 u w coth 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w + v 2 w + a 0 , Q 18 = a 1 v 2 4 u w tanh ϱ v 2 4 u w ± isech ϱ v 2 4 u w + v 2 4 v w a 1 v 2 4 u w tanh ϱ v 2 4 u w ± isech ϱ v 2 4 u w + v 2 w + a 0 , Q 19 = a 1 v 2 4 u w coth ϱ v 2 4 u w ± csc h v 2 4 u w + v 2 4 v w a 1 v 2 4 u w coth ϱ v 2 4 u w ± csc h v 2 4 u w + v 2 w + a 0 , Q 20 = a 1 v 2 4 u w tanh 1 4 ϱ v 2 4 u w ± coth 1 4 ϱ v 2 4 u w + 2 v 2 16 v w a 1 v 2 4 u w tanh 1 4 ϱ v 2 4 u w ± coth 1 4 ϱ v 2 4 u w + 2 v 4 w + a 0 , Q 21 = a 1 A 2 + B 2 v 2 4 u w A v 2 4 u w cosh ϱ v 2 4 u w A sinh ϱ v 2 4 u w + B v 2 4 v w + a 1 A 2 + B 2 v 2 4 u w A v 2 4 u w cosh ϱ v 2 4 u w A sinh ϱ v 2 4 u w + B v 2 w + a 0 , Q 22 = a 1 B 2 A 2 v 2 4 u w + A v 2 4 u w cosh ϱ v 2 4 u w A sinh ϱ v 2 4 u w + B v 2 4 v w + a 1 B 2 A 2 v 2 4 u w + A v 2 4 u w cosh ϱ v 2 4 u w A sinh ϱ v 2 4 u w + B v 2 w + a 0 ,
where A and B are two non-zero real constants that satisfy B 2 A 2 > 0 .
Q 23 = 4 a 1 u 2 w cosh 2 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w v v 2 4 u w sinh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w v cosh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w 2 + 2 a 1 u cosh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w v 2 4 u w sinh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w v cosh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w + a 0 , Q 24 = 4 a 1 u 2 w sinh 2 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w v v sinh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w v 2 4 u w cosh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w 2 2 a 1 u sinh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w v sinh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w v 2 4 u w cosh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w + a 0 , Q 25 = 4 a 1 u 2 w cosh 2 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w v v 2 4 u w sinh ϱ v 2 4 u w v cosh ϱ v 2 4 u w ± i v 2 4 u w 2 + 2 a 1 u cosh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w v 2 4 u w sinh ϱ v 2 4 u w v cosh ϱ v 2 4 u w ± i v 2 4 u w + a 0 , Q 26 = 4 a 1 u 2 w sinh 2 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w v v 2 4 u w cosh ϱ v 2 4 u w ± v 2 4 u w v sinh ϱ v 2 4 u w 2 + 2 a 1 u sinh 1 2 ϱ v 2 4 u w v 2 4 u w cosh ϱ v 2 4 u w ± v 2 4 u w v sinh ϱ v 2 4 u w + a 0 ,
Q 27 = 4 u sinh 1 4 ϱ v 2 4 u w cosh 1 4 ϱ v 2 4 u w 2 v 2 4 u w Cos h 2 1 4 ϱ v 2 4 u w 2 v sinh 1 4 ϱ v 2 4 u w cosh 1 4 ϱ v 2 4 u w v 2 4 u w .
Type 2: 
When v 2 4 u w < 0 and v w or u w 0 , the solutions of Equation (18) are
Q 28 = a 1 4 u w v 2 tan 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 v 2 4 v w + a 1 4 u w v 2 tan 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 v 2 w + a 0 , Q 29 = a 1 4 u w v 2 cot 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 + v 2 4 v w a 1 4 u w v 2 cot 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 + v 2 w + a 0 , Q 30 = a 1 4 u w v 2 tan ϱ 4 u w v 2 ± sec ϱ 4 u w v 2 v 2 4 v w + a 1 4 u w v 2 tan ϱ 4 u w v 2 ± sec ϱ 4 u w v 2 v 2 w + a 0 , Q 31 = a 1 4 u w v 2 cot ϱ 4 u w v 2 ± csc ϱ 4 u w v 2 + v 2 4 v w a 1 4 u w v 2 cot ϱ 4 u w v 2 ± csc ϱ 4 u w v 2 + v 2 w + a 0 , Q 32 = a 1 4 u w v 2 tan 1 4 ϱ 4 u w v 2 coth 1 4 ϱ 4 u w v 2 2 v 4 w + a 1 4 u w v 2 tan 1 4 ϱ 4 u w v 2 coth 1 4 ϱ 4 u w v 2 2 v 2 16 v w + a 0 , Q 33 = a 1 ± A 2 B 2 4 u w v 2 A 4 u w v 2 cos ϱ 4 u w v 2 A sinh ϱ 4 u w v 2 + B v 2 4 v w + a 1 ± A 2 B 2 4 u w v 2 A 4 u w v 2 cos ϱ 4 u w v 2 A sinh ϱ 4 u w v 2 + B v 2 w + a 0 , Q 34 = a 1 ± A 2 B 2 4 u w v 2 + A 4 u w v 2 cos ϱ 4 u w v 2 A sin ϱ 4 u w v 2 + B v 2 4 v w + a 1 ± A 2 B 2 4 u w v 2 + A 4 u w v 2 cos ϱ 4 u w v 2 A sin ϱ 4 u w v 2 + B v 2 w + a 0 ,
where A and B are two non-zero real constants that satisfy A 2 B 2 > 0 .
Q 35 = 4 a 1 u 2 w cos 2 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 v 4 u w v 2 sin 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 + v cos 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 2 2 a 1 u cos 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 4 u w v 2 sin 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 + v cos 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 + a 0 , Q 36 = 4 a 1 u 2 w sin 2 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 v 4 u w v 2 cos 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 v sin 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 2 + 2 a 1 u sin 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 4 u w v 2 cos 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 v sin 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 + a 0 , Q 37 = 4 a 1 u 2 w cos 2 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 v 4 u w v 2 sin ϱ 4 u w v 2 + v cos 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 ± 4 u w v 2 2 2 a 1 u cos 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 4 u w v 2 sin ϱ 4 u w v 2 + v cos 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 ± 4 u w v 2 + a 0 , Q 38 = 4 a 1 u 2 w sin 2 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 v 4 u w v 2 cos ϱ 4 u w v 2 ± 4 u w v 2 v sin ϱ 4 u w v 2 2 + 2 a 1 u sin 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 4 u w v 2 cos ϱ 4 u w v 2 ± 4 u w v 2 v sin ϱ 4 u w v 2 + a 0 , Q 39 = a 0 + 2 u sin 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 2 v 4 u w v 2 cos 2 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 v 4 u w v 2 v 2 4 u w v 2 cos 2 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 + v sin 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 + 4 u w v 2 2 2 u sin 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 v 2 2 u w sin 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 a 1 v 2 4 u w v 2 cos 2 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 + v sin 1 2 ϱ 4 u w v 2 + 4 u w v 2 2 .
Type 3: 
When u = 0 and w v 0 , the solutions of Equation (18) are
Q 40 = a 1 ( v . d ) 2 v w ( d sinh ( v . ϱ ) + cosh ( v . ϱ ) ) 2 a 1 v . d w ( d sinh ( v . ϱ ) + cosh ( v . ϱ ) ) + a 0 , Q 41 = a 1 v ( sinh ( v ϱ ) + cosh ( v ϱ ) ) 2 w ( d + sinh ( v ϱ ) + cosh ( v ϱ ) ) 2 a 1 v ( sinh ( v ϱ ) + cosh ( v ϱ ) ) w ( d + sinh ( v ϱ ) + cosh ( v ϱ ) ) + a 0 .
Type 4: 
When w 0 and u = v = 0 , the only solution of Equation (18) is
Q 42 = a 1 w v ( c + w ϱ ) 2 a 1 c + w ϱ + a 0 .

6. Results and Discussion

This paper sought the exact soliton solutions of the GP equation using the GREM method. The 2D, 3D, and contour plots were interpreted to show some obtained solutions’ specific dynamic and physical behavior for different parameter values. A family of dark, singular, kink, and periodic solitons were displayed for a set of values. Maple 18 was utilized to view the physical behavior of the GP equation.
Figure 1 illustrates the periodic wave structure of | Q 3 ( ϱ ) | for suitable values of constants involving A 1 = 1.67 , c 1 = 0.61 , ϵ = 0.1 , c 2 = 1.26 , ϱ 0 = 1.06 , A 0 = 0.25 , c 0 = 0.79 .
Figure 2 shows that the structure of | Q 11 ( ϱ ) | is the dark soliton for A 1 = 1.5 , c 1 = 1.61 , c 0 = 0.79 , ϵ = 0.1 , c 2 = 1.26 , ϱ 0 = 1.06 , and A 0 = 0.25 .
The graphical structure of | Q 13 ( ϱ ) | is the kink-type soliton for A 1 = 0.69 , c 0 = 0.7 , ϵ = 0.1 , c 2 = 1.26 , A 0 = 0.45 , ϱ 0 = 1.6 and given in Figure 3.
The graph of the result given | Q 16 ( ϱ ) | describes the dark soliton of GP-model and is illustrated in Figure 4 for a 0 = 0.06 , a 1 = 0.04 , v = 2 , ϵ = 0.7 , w = 1 , u = 0.3
Figure 5 shows that the depiction of | Q 18 ( ϱ ) | provides the dark–bright soliton shape using a 0 = 0.3 , a 1 = 1.47 , B = 0.69 , ϵ = 0.7 .
For the physical description of | Q 22 ( ϱ ) | with a 0 = 0.47 , b 1 = 0.69 , ϵ = 0.7 , the graphical representation is given in Figure 6, which illustrates the singular soliton. Furthermore, all 2D graphs are shown with t = 0.
It is noted that the solutions in [32] possess a bell-shaped wave, a periodic wave, and a shock wave, while in the present paper, singular, periodic, dark, combined dark–bright, and kink-type solitons were observed.

7. Conclusions

In this article, new exact soliton wave solutions were calculated for the Gilson–Pickering model by applying the extended simple equation method and the Riccati equation method. Several computational wave solitons were formulated by the techniques used. These solutions were checked for accuracy by substituting them in the original equation. Some solutions were represented in diverse sketches to describe the dynamical and physical characterizations of the waves, providing singular, periodic, bright, dark, kink-type, singular-kink, V-shaped, and shock wave soliton solutions. Our contribution and novelty were established by comparing its solutions with the previously published results. The solutions indicate that the proposed methodology promises to authorize us the ability to address an extensive class of NLEEs arising in mathematical physics. The soliton solutions obtained in the present study are just one example of solutions that can have the potential to enable the understanding and methodical analysis of the NLEE used widely in science and engineering.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Supervision and Revision, H.U.R.; Data curation, Formal Analysis and Methodology, A.U.A.; Funding acquisition, Methodology and Validation, E.M.T.-E.; Software, Resources, Writing—original draft and Revision, U.B.; Investigation, Resources and Revision, S.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at Umm Al-Qura University for supporting this work by grant code: 22UQU4330955DSR08.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, M.; Tian, B.; Hu, C.C.; Liu, S.H. Generalized Darboux transformation, solitonic interactions and bound states for a coupled fourth-order nonlinear Schrodinger system in a birefringent optical fiber. Appl. Math. Lett. 2021, 119, 106936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shen, Y.; Tian, B. Bilinear auto-Bäcklund transformations and soliton solutions of a (3 + 1)-dimensional generalized nonlinear evolution equation for the shallow water waves. Appl. Math. Lett. 2021, 122, 107301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gao, X.T.; Tian, B.; Shen, Y.; Feng, C.H. Comment on: Shallow water in an open sea or a wide channel: Auto-and non-auto-Bäcklund transformations with solitons for a generalized (2 + 1)-dimensional dispersive long-wave system. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2021, 151, 111222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, D.Y.; Tian, B.; Qu, Q.X.; Zhang, C.R.; Chen, S.S.; Wei, C.C. Lax pair, conservation laws, Darboux transformation and localized waves of a variable-coefficient coupled Hirota system in an inhomogeneous optical fiber. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2021, 150, 110487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gao, X.Y.; Guo, Y.J.; Shan, W.R. Optical waves/modes in a multicomponent inhomogeneous optical fiber via a three-coupled variable-coefficient nonlinear Schrodinger system. Appl. Math. Lett. 2021, 120, 107161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gao, X.Y.; Guo, Y.J.; Shan, W.R. Beholding the shallow water waves near an ocean beach or in a lake via a Boussinesq-Burgers system. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2021, 147, 110875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cevikel, A.C.; Aksoy, E. Soliton solutions of nonlinear fractional differential equations with their applications in mathematical physics. Rev. Mex. Física 2021, 67, 422–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cevikel, A.C. New exact solutions of the space-time fractional KdV-Burgers and nonlinear fractional foam Drainage equation. Therm. Sci. 2018, 22 (Suppl. 1), 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Aksoy, E.; Bekir, A.; Cevikel, A.C. Study on fractional differential equations with modified Riemann-Liouville derivative via Kudryashov method. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2019, 20, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bekir, A.; Guner, O.; Cevikel, A. The exp-function method for some time-fractional differential equations. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 2016, 4, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guner, O.; Bekir, A.; Cevikel, A.C. Dark soliton and periodic wave solutions of nonlinear evolution equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013, 2013, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Cevikel, A.C.; Bekir, A.; San, S.; Gucen, M.B. Construction of periodic and solitary wave solutions for the complex nonlinear evolution equations. J. Frankl. Inst. 2014, 351, 694–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rehman, H.U.; Awan, A.U.; Tag-ElDin, E.M.; Alhazmi, S.E.; Yassen, M.F.; Haider, R. Extended hyperbolic function method for the (2 + 1)-dimensional nonlinear soliton equation. Res. Phys. 2022, 40, 105802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rehman, H.U.; Iqbal, I.; Subhi Aiadi, S.; Mlaiki, N.; Saleem, M.S. Soliton solutions of Klein–Fock–Gordon equation using Sardar subequation method. Mathematics 2022, 10, 3377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rehman, H.U.; Ullah, N.; Imran, M.A. Exact solutions of Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov equation using two analytical techniques. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2021, 136, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rehman, H.U.; Awan, A.U.; Allahyani, S.A.; Tag-ElDin, E.M.; Binyamin, M.A.; Yasin, S. Exact solution of paraxial wave dynamical model with Kerr Media by using ϕ6 model expansion technique. Results Phys. 2022, 42, 105975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Raza, N.; Arshed, S.; Sial, S. Optical solitons for coupled Fokas–Lenells equation in birefringence fibers. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2019, 33, 1950317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, M.; Li, X.; Zhang, J. The (G G)–expansion method and travelling wave solutions of nonlinear evolution equations in mathematical physics. Phys. Lett. A 2008, 372, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xu, G.Q. Extended auxiliary equation method and its applications to three generalized NLS equations. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014, 2014, 541370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Mahmud, F.; Samsuzzoha, M.; Akbar, M.A. The generalized Kudryashov method to obtain exact traveling wave solutions of the PHI–four equation and the Fisher equation. Res. Phys. 2017, 7, 4296–4302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wazwaz, A.M. The tanh method for traveling wave solutions of nonlinear equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2004, 154, 713–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Seadawy, A.R.; Ali, A.; Zahed, H.; Baleanu, D. The Klein–Fock–Gordon and Tzitzeica dynamical equations with advanced analytical wave solutions. Results Phys. 2020, 19, 103565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lu, D.; Seadawy, A.; Arshad, M. Applications of extended simple equation method on unstable nonlinear Schrodinger equations. Optik 2017, 140, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhu, S.D. The generalizing Riccati equation mapping method in nonlinear evolution equation: Application to (2 + 1)-dimensional Boiti–Leon–Pempinelle equation. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2008, 37, 1335–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, Y.M. F–expansion method and its application for finding new exact solutions to the Kudryashov-Sinelshchikov equation. J. Appl. Math. 2013, 2013, 895760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ma, W.X.; Lee, J.H. A transformed rational function method and exact solutions to the (3+1)–dimensional Jimbo-Miwa equation. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2009, 42, 1356–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Ma, W.X.; Fuchssteiner, B. Explicit and exact solutions to a Kolmogorov-Petrovskii-Piskunov equation. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 1996, 31, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Kumar, S.; Mohan, B. A novel and efficient method for obtaining Hirota’s bilinear form for the nonlinear evolution equation in (n + 1) dimensions. Partial. Differ. Equ. Appl. Math. 2022, 5, 100274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ahmad, S.; Saifullah, S.; Khan, A.; Inc, M. New local and nonlocal soliton solutions of a nonlocal reverse space–time mKdV equation using improved Hirota bilinear method. Phys. Lett. A 2022, 450, 128393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ma, W.X. A polynomial conjecture connected with rogue waves in the KdV equation. Partial. Differ. Equ. Appl. Math. 2021, 3, 100023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhao, T.; Wang, M.; Chu, Y. On the bounds of the perimeter of an ellipse. Acta Math. Sci. 2022, 42, 491–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rezazadeh, H.; Jhangeer, A.; Tala-Tebue, E.; Hashemi, M.S.; Sharif, S.; Ahmad, H.; Yao, S.W. New wave surfaces and bifurcation of nonlinear periodic waves for Gilson–Pickering equation. Res. Phys. 2021, 24, 104192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bazighifan, O.; Ahmad, H.; Yao, S.W. New oscillation criteria for advanced differential equations of fourth order. Mathematics 2020, 8, 728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ghanbari, B.; Nisar, K.S.; Aldhaifallah, M. Abundant solitary wave solutions to an extended nonlinear Schrödinger’s equation with conformable derivative using an efficient integration method. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 2020, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yokus, A.; Durur, H.; Ahmad, H.; Yao, S.W. Construction of different types analytic solutions for the Zhiber–Shabat equation. Mathematics 2020, 8, 908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yokus, A.; Durur, H.; Ahmad, H.; Thounthong, P.; Zhang, Y.F. Construction of exact traveling wave solutions of the Bogoyavlenskii equation by (G/G, 1/G)-expansion and (1/G)-expansion techniques. Res. Phys. 2020, 19, 103409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yokus, A.; Durur, H.; Ahmad, H. Hyperbolic type solutions for the couple Boiti–Leon–Pempinelli system. Facta Univ. Ser. Math. Inf. 2020, 35, 523–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yokus, A.; Kaya, D. Comparison exact and numerical simulation of the traveling wave solution in nonlinear dynamics. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2020, 34, 2050282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Graphical view of | Q 3 ( ϱ ) | for A 1 = 1.67 , c 1 = 0.61 , ϵ = 0.1 , c 2 = 1.26 , ϱ 0 = 1.06 , A 0 = 0.25 , c 0 = 0.79 : (a) 3D plot, (b) contour plot, and (c) 2D plot at t = 0 .
Figure 1. Graphical view of | Q 3 ( ϱ ) | for A 1 = 1.67 , c 1 = 0.61 , ϵ = 0.1 , c 2 = 1.26 , ϱ 0 = 1.06 , A 0 = 0.25 , c 0 = 0.79 : (a) 3D plot, (b) contour plot, and (c) 2D plot at t = 0 .
Universe 08 00592 g001
Figure 2. Graphical view of | Q 11 ( ϱ ) | for A 1 = 1.5 , c 1 = 0.61 , c 0 = 0.79 , A 0 = 0.25 , ϱ 0 = 1.06 , c 2 = 1.26 and ϵ = 0.1 : (a) 3D plot, (b) contour plot, and (c) 2D plot at t = 0 .
Figure 2. Graphical view of | Q 11 ( ϱ ) | for A 1 = 1.5 , c 1 = 0.61 , c 0 = 0.79 , A 0 = 0.25 , ϱ 0 = 1.06 , c 2 = 1.26 and ϵ = 0.1 : (a) 3D plot, (b) contour plot, and (c) 2D plot at t = 0 .
Universe 08 00592 g002
Figure 3. Graphical view of | Q 13 ( ϱ ) | for A 1 = 0.69 , c 0 = 0.7 , ϵ = 0.1 , c 2 = 1.26 , A 0 = 0.45 and ϱ 0 = 1.6 : (a) 3D plot, (b) contour plot, and (c) 2D plot at t = 0 .
Figure 3. Graphical view of | Q 13 ( ϱ ) | for A 1 = 0.69 , c 0 = 0.7 , ϵ = 0.1 , c 2 = 1.26 , A 0 = 0.45 and ϱ 0 = 1.6 : (a) 3D plot, (b) contour plot, and (c) 2D plot at t = 0 .
Universe 08 00592 g003aUniverse 08 00592 g003b
Figure 4. Graphical view of | Q 16 ( ϱ ) | for a 1 = 0.04 , v = 2 , ϵ = 1 , a 0 = 0.06 , w = 0.7 , u = 0.3 : (a) 3D plot, (b) contour plot, and (c) 2D plot at t = 0 .
Figure 4. Graphical view of | Q 16 ( ϱ ) | for a 1 = 0.04 , v = 2 , ϵ = 1 , a 0 = 0.06 , w = 0.7 , u = 0.3 : (a) 3D plot, (b) contour plot, and (c) 2D plot at t = 0 .
Universe 08 00592 g004
Figure 5. Graphical view of | Q 18 ( ϱ ) | for a 1 = 0.07 , v = 0.9 , w = 0.7 , u = 0.6 , a 0 = 0.6 , ϵ = 0.03 : (a) 3D plot, (b) contour plot, and (c) 2D plot at t = 0 .
Figure 5. Graphical view of | Q 18 ( ϱ ) | for a 1 = 0.07 , v = 0.9 , w = 0.7 , u = 0.6 , a 0 = 0.6 , ϵ = 0.03 : (a) 3D plot, (b) contour plot, and (c) 2D plot at t = 0 .
Universe 08 00592 g005
Figure 6. Graphical view of | Q 22 ( ϱ ) | for a 0 = 0.3 , a 1 = 1.47 , B = 0.69 , u = 0.7 , ϵ = 0.1 , v = 1.26 , w = 0.2 , A = 0.43 : (a) 3D plot, (b) contour plot, and (c) 2D plot at t = 0 .
Figure 6. Graphical view of | Q 22 ( ϱ ) | for a 0 = 0.3 , a 1 = 1.47 , B = 0.69 , u = 0.7 , ϵ = 0.1 , v = 1.26 , w = 0.2 , A = 0.43 : (a) 3D plot, (b) contour plot, and (c) 2D plot at t = 0 .
Universe 08 00592 g006aUniverse 08 00592 g006b
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rehman, H.U.; Awan, A.U.; Tag-ElDin, E.M.; Bashir, U.; Allahyani, S.A. Construction of Exact Solutions for Gilson–Pickering Model Using Two Different Approaches. Universe 2022, 8, 592. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8110592

AMA Style

Rehman HU, Awan AU, Tag-ElDin EM, Bashir U, Allahyani SA. Construction of Exact Solutions for Gilson–Pickering Model Using Two Different Approaches. Universe. 2022; 8(11):592. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8110592

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rehman, Hamood Ur, Aziz Ullah Awan, ElSayed M. Tag-ElDin, Uzma Bashir, and Seham Ayesh Allahyani. 2022. "Construction of Exact Solutions for Gilson–Pickering Model Using Two Different Approaches" Universe 8, no. 11: 592. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8110592

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop