Next Article in Journal
Adenoviral E1A Exploits Flexibility and Disorder to Target Cellular Proteins
Previous Article in Journal
T Cells Subsets in the Immunopathology and Treatment of Sjogren’s Syndrome
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/biom10111540
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mapping the Inorganic and Proteomic Differences among Different Types of Human Teeth: A Preliminary Compositional Insight

by
Vaibhav Sharma
1,*,
Simran Rastogi
1,
Kaushal Kumar Bhati
2,
Alagiri Srinivasan
3,
Ajoy Roychoudhury
4,
Fredrik Nikolajeff
5 and
Saroj Kumar
1,*
1
Departement of Biophysics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
2
Louvain Institute of Biomolecular Science, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1348 Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
3
Department of Biochemistry, Jamia Hamdard University, New Delhi 110062, India
4
Centre for Dental Education and Research (CDER), All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
5
Department of Health Sciences, Lulea University of Technology, 97187 Lulea, Sweden
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2020, 10(11), 1540; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10111540
Submission received: 22 September 2020 / Revised: 29 October 2020 / Accepted: 9 November 2020 / Published: 11 November 2020
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In recent years, studies on mineralized tissues are becoming increasingly popular not only due to the diverse mechanophysical properties of such materials but also because of the growing need to understand the intricate mechanism involved in their assembly and formation. The biochemical mechanism that results in the formation of such hierarchical structures through a well-coordinated accumulation of inorganic and organic components is termed biomineralization. Some prime examples of such tissues in the human body are teeth and bones. Our current study is an attempt to dissect the compositional details of the inorganic and organic components in four major types of human teeth using mass spectrometry-based approaches. We quantified inorganic materials using inductively coupled plasma resonance mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Differential level of ten different elements, Iron (Fe), Cadmium (Cd), Potassium (K), Sulphur (S), Cobalt (Co), Magnesium (Mg), Manganese (Mn), Zinc (Zn), Aluminum (Al), and Copper (Cu) were quantified across different teeth types. The qualitative and quantitative details of their respective proteomic milieu revealed compositional differences. We found 152 proteins in total tooth protein extract. Differential abundance of proteins in different teeth types were also noted. Further, we were able to find out some significant protein-protein interaction (PPI) backbone through the STRING database. Since this is the first study analyzing the differential details of inorganic and organic counterparts within teeth, this report will pave new directions to the compositional understanding and development of novel in-vitro repair strategies for such biological materials.

1. Introduction

Millions of years of evolution have resulted in numerous natural materials with a high degree of sophistication which are associated with many disciplines of science including chemistry, material science, physics, biology, and engineering to name a few. The ingenious construction of biological hard tissues has always fascinated the scientific community. Unlike soft tissues, hard tissues are highly mineralized. Notable examples in the human body are bone, teeth, and calcitic otoconia of the internal ear. These biological composites contain an inorganic phase (minerals) and organic (primarily proteins) components that orchestrates the formation of such hierarchical structures through the process of biomineralization [1,2]. Investigations on hard tissues have always been a daunting task due to plenteous reasons which include getting rid of excess salts, low protein yield, and protein heterogeneity issues due to the presence of diverse post-translational modifications profile within these proteins [3].
Human teeth consist of three layers of mineralized tissue namely the outermost enamel, dentin forms the middle layer, and the inmost layer is called the cementum. Overall, 80% of the teeth structure constitutes of the inorganic part which is hydroxyapatite (HA), a form of calcium phosphate that is also known to be present in bones. The remaining fraction contains a small number of growth factors, lipids, and primarily proteins, most of which are known to be intrinsically disordered [4,5]. On the inorganic end, HA serves as the key mineral constituent, in addition to different elements that are present in minute quantities. The “chemical signatures” of HA have already been discussed in detail through an ample number of studies from enamel [6,7,8], dentine [9], and the cementum [10] in addition to complete human teeth [11,12], largely through Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The details of elemental composition within teeth are important as they are known to be present in tooth enamel [13]. The presence of even minuscule concentrations of such elements has been reported to influence the size and organization of apatite crystals, which in turn has an impact on the hardness of the enamel [14]. Also, different trace elements have been linked to various roles like caries protective and caries promotion [15,16]. In practice, atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) [17] and inductively coupled plasma resonance mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [18,19] could be used to quantitate the elemental composition of biomaterials like teeth.
Besides these aforesaid inorganic players, protein molecules are known to be the key influencers of tooth development [20], biomineralization [1,21,22], and can also aid in regeneration potentials [23,24], despite this fact not many proteomic studies have been attempted in the past. Proteomic studies from individual tooth tissues like dentin [25,26] and pulp [27] are reported in the past. In the case of whole human teeth, only a single study has shown the EDTA solubilized proteins from a complete tooth and reported their tooth regenerative capacities through cell line-based assays [28].
Our previous report has already highlighted the preliminary differences within these different tooth protein extracts through gel-based assays [1]. In this current study, we examined the differences in four major classes of human teeth concerning their inorganic and organic constitutions. Organizing such a study was a daunting task in terms of technical challenges we need to overcome. Still, we are essentially rooting on the importance of this work since mapping such differential changes would reveal the compositional details of different teeth types and may aid in understanding the variables that determine different shapes and functionalities. Moreover, this study would also be useful for designing synthetic approaches for efficient peptide-based mineralization of teeth.
The overall approach we followed is depicted as a scheme in Figure 1.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Human Teeth and Isolation of Tooth Proteins

This study was approved by the Institute Ethics Committee for Post Graduate Research of All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Ref no. IECPG-387/29.06.2016). All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was received from all the participants. Samples were collected from the Center for Dental Education and Research (CDER), AIIMS, New Delhi. The adults were aged 22–25 years and removal of teeth were due to orthodontic reasons. Collected teeth were lyophilized and kept in liquid nitrogen until used. Teeth were washed thoroughly with deionized water (2–3 times). After washing, teeth of similar types were pooled together and crushed in a pestle and mortar in the presence of liquid nitrogen until a fine powder was formed. For the isolation of protein from different teeth, a protocol standardized by Sharma et al. was followed [1]. Briefly, 10 g of the powder was taken and mixed with 20 mL of demineralization solution containing 0.1 M EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, and protease inhibitors (Roche) at 20 °C for 2 days, centrifuged at 10,000 rpm, and collected supernatant was dialyzed against HEPES buffer, pH 7.4. The clarified supernatant was further concentrated by the membrane-based cut off filters (3.5 kDa), which helps to remove impurities and salts as well as also reduced the loss of smaller proteins from our extracts. The protein concentration was measured by BCA kit (Pierce, Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and protein extracts were checked by running an SDS-PAGE gel.

2.2. Inductively Coupled Plasma Resonance Mass Spectroscopy (ICP-MS)

Prior to analysis, teeth samples were washed with ICP-MS grade water and speed frost dried overnight. The equal weight of competitive samples was microwave digested in HNO3 (Suprapur® Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) using MARSTM Microwave tissue digestion system. These digested samples were further diluted up to 50 mL in ICP-MS grade water and prepared for ICP-MS run in triplicates. The total metal analysis was performed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS; 7700×Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The ppb values we obtained after ICP-MS analysis were normalized according to initial sample weight and dilutions factors as given in the following formula:
M e t a l   μ g g   d r y   w e i g h t   o f   t h e   s a m p l e = I C P − M S   r e a d i n g   p p b × D i l u t i o n w e i g h t 1000
The values shown in the graphs are an average of three independent experiments and the standard deviation plotted as error bars.

2.3. Label-Free Quantification of Tooth Proteins through Mass Spectrometry

Sample Preparation—Samples were taken and reduced with 5 mM tris 2-carboxyethyl phosphine (TCEP) and further alkylated with 50 mM iodoacetamide and then digested with Trypsin (1:50, Trypsin/lysate ratio) for 16 h at 37 °C. Digested samples were cleaned using a C18 silica cartridge to remove the salt and dried using a speed vac. The dried pellet was resuspended in buffer A (5% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid).
Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Peptide Mixtures—All the experiments were performed using EASY-nLC 1000 system (ThermoFisher Scientific, Illinois, USA) coupled to Thermo Fisher-QExactive equipped with nanoelectrospray ion source. 1.0 μg of the peptide mixture was resolved using 25 cm PicoFrit column (360 μm outer diameter, 75 μm inner diameter, 10 μm tip) filled with 1.8 μm of C18-resin (Dr. Maisch Ammerbuch, Germany). The peptides were loaded with buffer A and eluted with a 0–40% gradient of buffer B (95% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min for 90 min. MS data were acquired using a data-dependent top10 method dynamically choosing the most abundant precursor ions from the survey scan. We performed three technical replicates in this experiment. Since we have used proteins from pooled teeth samples of different individuals, we did not run biological replicates for this study.
Data Processing—All samples were processed, and 4 RAW files generated were analyzed with Proteome Discoverer (v2.2) against the Uniprot Human reference proteome database. For the Sequest search, the precursor and fragment mass tolerances were set at 10 ppm and 0.5 Da, respectively. The protease used to generate peptides, i.e., enzyme specificity was set for trypsin/P (cleavage at the C terminus of “K/R: unless followed by “P”) along with a maximum missed cleavages value of two. Carbamidomethyl on cysteine as fixed modification and oxidation of methionine and N-terminal acetylation were considered as variable modifications for database search. Both peptide spectrum match and protein false discovery rate were set to 0.01 FDR. Heat maps, correlation plot, and principal component analysis (PCA) were prepared through R programming.

2.4. Protein Interaction Studies

The search tool for retrieval of interacting genes (STRING)(https://string-db.org/) database which integrates known and predicted protein-protein interactions (PPIs) can be applied to decipher the functional interactions of proteins [29]. To seek potential interactions among tooth proteins, the STRING (Version 11.0) tool was employed. Active interaction sources including text mining, experiments, databases, and co-expression as well as species limited to “Homo sapiens” with the confidence of 0.4 was set. Clustering was performed by k mean clustering. In the networks, the nodes correspond to the proteins and the edges represent the interactions. The thickness of edges represents the interaction strength.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Inorganic Analysis Revealed Differences in Teeth Mineral Composition

Trace elements can enter our body through multiple routes such as food, water, or exposure to the environment [30,31,32] and can get incorporated into enamel/dentin crystals. Although their presence is confirmed within teeth, not much literature is available to comment upon their functional significance at the level of teeth mineralization or morphology. In this study, a total of 10 elements were quantified among different teeth of humans.
As shown in Figure 2, among all elements, iron (Fe), cobalt (Co), cadmium (Cd) and magnesium (Mg) values show the least variations among four types of teeth and the value varies from 112–125 μg/g, 0.062–0.075 μg/g, 0.9–1.16 μg/g and 5400–6000 μg/g respectively. Iron is considered as an essential element of human life. It can enter the human body through the consumption of vegetables and was reported to exist in teeth [33]. It is testified that incorporation of Fe results in lowering the content of carbonate type A apatite [14]. On the other hand, cobalt and cadmium are toxic metals that can enter the body through contaminated air, water, and food. Co and Cd can easily affect teeth by replacing Ca2+ ions within the apatite crystal [34,35]. Magnesium is one of the most abundant trace elements in saliva and since teeth remain bathing with salivary components. Magnesium is also the most abundant trace element in enamel [36,37]. Our study also echoed with these previous findings and Mg was indeed present in the highest concentrations of 5400–6000 μg/g.
Elements such as aluminum (Al), copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn) were among the ones with the most variations within different teeth types. Within a human body, aluminum concentration increases with age and higher amounts may cause brain and skeleton disorders [38,39]. Ghadimi et al. [14] reported a negative correlation of Al concentrations with the crack length i.e., Teeth with higher concentration are resistant to longer cracks and vice versa. In our study, we observed higher concentrations of Al in incisor and premolar teeth, this is justifiable as these teeth types are less prone to cracks in comparison to molar teeth. Zinc is an essential trace element present throughout the body. In the mouth, it is naturally present in plaque, saliva, and enamel. Zinc is acquired by hydroxyapatite and competes for Ca2+ ions within the lattice [17]. It has a role in the remineralization of enamel and increased concentration may reduce susceptibility for dental caries [40]. In our study, we are reporting for the first time, maximum concentrations of Zn in incisor teeth, which may have a role in making its caries resistive.
One of the major limiting factors while studying the trace elements is the presence of a myriad of factors that may influence the content of heavy metals in hard tooth tissues. In addition to this, the effects of diet during pre-eruptive and post-eruptive phases also influence the results and are not clearly separated in most experimental designs, which in turn complicates the interpretation of the results. Nevertheless, the importance of trace elements in modulating tooth mineralization, development, and role in carries cannot be understated, though further studies are needed to look into the detailed role of the presence of these elements within hard tissues.

3.2. Proteins in Four Major Teeth Types Differ Qualitatively and Quantitatively

For proteome analysis, the tooth protein extracts were subjected to label-free quantification using mass spectrometry. A total of 152 proteins were identified (Table S1). These proteins represent different predominant biological and molecular functions as assessed through Gene Ontology (GO) analysis (Table 1). These proteins were found to be associated with various biological processes (cell differentiation, cell organization, and biogenesis, metabolic process, transport, etc.) and had diverse molecular functions (DNA binding, protein binding, enzyme regulator activity, structural molecular activity). In this study, we found Serotransferrin, fibrillin-1, components of immunoglobins, and collagen subtypes were among the most abundant proteins in terms of peptide hits. Serotransferrin is a glycoprotein known to be present in enamel pellicle and has a role in tooth morphogenesis [41,42] whereas, fibrillin-1 and collagens are extracellular matrix proteins. Collagen is the most abundant protein in dentin and also present in bone [5]. Fibrillins are cysteine-rich glycoproteins which are responsible for providing protein structural support and helps teeth to withstand compression forces during mastication [43]. In addition to collagens, several non-collagenous proteins like Versican, Vitronectin, Hyaluronan, and proteoglycan link protein were also found in these protein extracts. Several other proteins reported to have a role in tooth development and odontogenesis were also enriched in our list, these include Tenascin [44,45], Thrombospondin-1 [46], Laminins [47,48], Fibronectin [49], Dickkopf related-protein 3 [50], and Vitronectin [51]. Furthermore, proteins like antileukoproteinase, lactotransferrin, and serotransferrin which are detected in our extracts are known to be present in saliva and which are adsorbed in the associated enamel pellicle. This acquired enamel pellicle from saliva plays a crucial role in crystal growth homeostasis of teeth and in modulating the process of mineralization [52,53]. A comparative analysis was done through label-free quantification and a relative abundance of all proteins was calculated. Interestingly, differential change in protein abundance could be seen among different teeth types we investigated (Figure 3a). Incisor and molar teeth proteins possess the most distinct protein profiles. Most of the proteins which are highly abundant in the incisor protein extract are showing low abundance levels in the molar teeth extract. A similar trend can be observed in incisor vs canine and premolar vs molar protein extracts whereas there is some amount of similarities between the protein abundance profiles of incisor and premolar. Here a noteworthy point is the use of accurate terminology, these abundance changes should not be considered as an actual expression profile due to the presence of different protein species/isoforms that may result from a variety of posttranslational modifications, protein splicing, degradation, or emigration [54,55]. These tooth extracts were further analyzed through a correlation plot and principal component analysis (PCA). In accordance with the heat map and the correlation plot, PCA analysis also showed that the protein composition of incisor and premolar teeth are closer to each other whereas the proteins of incisor and canine or incisor and molar are distantly correlated in these models (Figure 3b,c). Since this is the first-ever report on the differential proteome profile among these four teeth types, it is difficult to explain these changes in detail, and hence further studies are needed to draw valid conclusions.
The unique and common proteins among different categories are depicted in the form of a Venn diagram (Figure 3d). We found 33 common proteins present in all four types of teeth extracts. Some of the key proteins in this list include Serotransferrin, Collagen subtypes, Tenascin, Fibrillin, Histone subtypes, and a 60kDa heat shock protein and others described in Table 1 along with their UniProt IDs. A detailed list containing the complete set of unique and common protein within all four categories is provided in Table S2.
The differential abundance was also quantitated by comparing the log 2 abundance ratios between all four teeth proteins. Some key proteins that showed high or low abundance in each of these six categories: canine vs incisor, incisor vs molar, molar vs premolar, canine vs premolar, incisor vs premolar, canine vs molar are shown (Figure 4a–f). The log 2 abundance of equal to or greater than ±2 were taken into account for the sake of representation. However, a detailed table showing a complete list of differentially abundant proteins with their respective abundance ratios (log 2 values) among the possible six combinations of different teeth protein extracts are provided in Table S3 (Tables 1–6). Many proteins exhibiting varied abundance are reported to have a role in tooth development.

3.3. Protein Interaction Network Studies

We used the MS data for prediction and validation by in silico protein-protein analysis. The protein-protein interactions (PPI) were assessed through the STRING tool. The cluster analysis of the complete list of tooth proteins obtained in our study resulted in four significant clusters comprising of four different class of identified proteins (Figure 5).
Cluster I included different keratins that are involved in self oligomerization and interaction with other proteins in cluster II like Fibronectin (FN1), Kininogen-1 (KNG1), and Plasminogen (PNG). Though it can be argued that sometimes keratin comes as a contaminant protein in mass-based experiments, but in this case, keratins are previously reported in tooth proteins and serve as a part of enamel organic matrix proteins [56,57]. Cluster II was found enriched in core teeth proteins like Tenascin (TNC), Fibronectin (FN1), Plasminogen (PLG), Vitronectin (VTN), Versican core protein (VCAN) and Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (ORM-1), etc. The role of these key proteins has already been extensively described in the proteome analysis section of this manuscript. The proteins in cluster II are linked with cluster III through basement membrane heparan sulfate (HSPG2), Versican core protein (VCAN), and Fibrillin-1 (FBN1). Cluster II is primarily composed of structural proteins i.e., collagens. Collagens are the main components of the organic matrix of teeth [58,59], especially dentin and enamel. Cluster IV constitutes mainly of secretory proteins like Histones subtypes and ubiquitin variants. Various histone deacetylases have been reported to possess a prime role in tooth development and mineralization [60,61]. Since histones perform their function through gene regulation, their direct impact on protein interactions is difficult to discuss here and is beyond the scope of the present study. The proteins in cluster IV are strongly interacting and dependent on Thrombospondin-1 (THBS-1) for further interconnections with clusters II and III.
Furthermore, we also queried the STRING database through the list of common proteins that we obtained in our analysis (Figure 6). The central portion of Figure 6 highlights two small clusters that were obtained after removing all the secretory proteins from the list. We also observed some important proteins that have overlapping connections among other clusters are Fibronectin (FN1), Fibrillin 1 (FBN1), and Tenascin (TNC).
Additionally, we searched the STRING database for the available information from published literature on interacting partners of these key proteins that we found to be overlapping and connected with every other cluster for instance the interacting partners of Tenascin (TNC) include Fibronectin (FN1), Aggrecan core protein (ACAN), both of which are present in our list of identified proteins. Similarly, most of the interacting partners of Fibronectin (FN1) and Fibrillin-1 (FBN1) were also present in our extracts. This backtracking validates our MS-based identification also.

4. Conclusions

Our study highlights the compositional differences between the four major types of human teeth for inorganic and organic constituents. Since the key inorganic component is hydroxyapatite (HA), which is common in all teeth types, the presence of several trace elements was investigated in this current study. These trace elements can substitute various ions including Ca2+ and PO42- and may regulate the apatite crystal formation. We observed variations in different trace elements concentration within different teeth types, for instance, a selective abundance of Zinc (Zn) and Aluminum (Al) was shown in incisor teeth whereas manganese (Mn) and copper (Cu) concentrations were found elevated in the premolar teeth. Such observations have never been made in the past. Though further studies are needed to draw strong conclusions, our study may be instrumental in initiating the argument for purposeful advancement in this direction.
For analyzing the organic structural components, we have performed label-free quantification of protein extracts from four subtypes of teeth. We have found qualitative and quantitative differences. Some of the key proteins involved in tooth development have shown varying abundance levels among diverse teeth types. The list includes Serotransferrin, Fibronectin, Fibrillin-1, Versican core protein, Tenascin, and Vitronectin to name a few. Additionally, we identified and represented some known interactions within the STRING database which corroborated well with structural proteins we identified in our MS-based experiments. Upon narrowing down of clustering results, Fibrillin-1, Fibronectin, and Tenascin were found to be the most interactive proteins and are responsible for interconnecting many clusters. We acknowledge the technical limitations associated with the availability of biomaterial like teeth to qualify our findings on rigorous statistical standards. Even though, this report should work as a preliminary reference to future compositional relevant studies.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/10/11/1540/s1, Figure S1: Gene ontology enrichment in proteins from different teeth types, Table S1: Complete list of identified proteins in human tooth extracts, Table S2: Complete list of proteins shown in the Venn diagram, Table S3 (Tables 1–6): Complete list of differentially expressed proteins between all tooth types. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD022223.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.S. and S.K.; methodology, V.S.; software, K.K.B.; validation, V.S, S.R.; formal analysis, V.S.; investigation, A.S.; resources, F.N and A.R.; data curation, V.S. and A.R.; writing—original draft preparation, V.S.; writing—review and editing, S.K., K.K.B., A.S.; supervision, S.K., A.S.; project administration, S.R.; funding acquisition, F.N. and S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Vaibhav Sharma and Saroj Kumar gratefully acknowledge the departmental instrument facility at the Department of Biophysics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sharma, V.; Srinivasan, A.; Roychoudhury, A.; Rani, K.; Tyagi, M.; Dev, K.; Nikolajeff, F.; Kumar, S. Characterization of protein extracts from different types of human teeth and insight in biomineralization. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sharma, V.; Rani, K.; Roychoudhury, A.; Chawla, A.; Nikolajeff, F.; Kumar, S. Novel insights into regulation of human teeth biomineralization: Deciphering the role of post-translational modifications in a tooth protein extract. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Jágr, M.; Eckhardt, A.; Pataridis, S.; Broukal, Z.; Dušková, J.; Mikšík, I. Proteomics of human teeth and saliva. Physiol. Res. 2014, 63, S141–S154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Boskey, A.L.; Villarreal-Ramirez, E. Intrinsically disordered proteins and biomineralization. Matrix Biol. 2016, 52, 43–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Sharma, V.; Srinivasan, A.; Nikolajeff, F.; Kumar, S. Biomineralization process in hard tissues: The interaction complexity within protein and inorganic counterparts. Acta Biomater. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Reyes-Gasga, J.; Martínez-Piñeiro, E.L.; Rodríguez-Álvarez, G.; Tiznado-Orozco, G.E.; García-García, R.; Brès, E.F. XRD and FTIR crystallinity indices in sound human tooth enamel and synthetic hydroxyapatite. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2013, 33, 4568–4574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mihály, J.; Gombás, V.; Afishah, A.; Mink, J. FT-Raman investigation of human dental enamel surfaces. J. Raman Spectrosc. Int. J. Orig.Work Asp. Raman Spectrosc. Incl. Higher Order Process. Brillouin Rayleigh Scatt. 2009, 40, 898–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kim, I.-H.; Son, J.S.; Min, B.K.; Kim, Y.K.; Kim, K.-H.; Kwon, T.-Y. A simple, sensitive and non-destructive technique for characterizing bovine dental enamel erosion: Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2016, 8, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Liu, Y.; Yao, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y. A Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis of carious dentin from transparent zone to normal zone. Caries Res. 2014, 48, 320–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Rechmann, P.; White, J.M.; Cecchini, S.C.M.; Hennig, T. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) of laser-irradiated cementum. In Proceedings of the Lasers in Dentistry IX, San Jose, CA, USA, 25–31 January 2003; pp. 115–121. [Google Scholar]
  11. Anwar Alebrahim, M.; Krafft, C.; Sekhaneh, W.; Sigusch, B.; Popp, J. ATR-FTIR and Raman spectroscopy of primary and permanent teeth. Biomed. Spectrosc. Imaging 2014, 3, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hędzelek, W.; Marcinkowska, A.; Domka, L.; Wachowiak, R. Infrared spectroscopic identification of chosen dental materials and natural teeth. Acta Phys. Pol. A 2008, 2, 471–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sprawson, E.; Bury, F.W. On the chemical evidences of the organic content of human enamel. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Ser. B Contain. Pap. Biol. Character 1928, 102, 419–426. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ghadimi, E.; Eimar, H.; Marelli, B.; Nazhat, S.N.; Asgharian, M.; Vali, H.; Tamimi, F. Trace elements can influence the physical properties of tooth enamel. SpringerPlus 2013, 2, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Annegarn, H.; Jodaikin, A.; Cleaton-Jones, P.; Sellschop, J.; Madiba, C.; Bibby, D. PIXE analysis of caries related trace elements in tooth enamel. Nucl. Instrum. Methods 1981, 181, 323–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hare, D.; Austin, C.; Doble, P.; Arora, M. Elemental bio-imaging of trace elements in teeth using laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. J. Dent. 2011, 39, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Brudevold, F.; Steadman, L.T.; Spinelli, M.A.; Amdur, B.H.; Grøn, P. A study of zinc in human teeth. Arch. Oral Biol. 1963, 8, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Brown, C.J.; Chenery, S.R.; Smith, B.; Mason, C.; Tomkins, A.; Roberts, G.J.; Sserunjogi, L.; Tiberindwa, J.V. Environmental influences on the trace element content of teeth—implications for disease and nutritional status. Arch. Oral Biol. 2004, 49, 705–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Webb, E.; Amarasiriwardena, D.; Tauch, S.; Green, E.F.; Jones, J.; Goodman, A.H. Inductively coupled plasma-mass (ICP-MS) and atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES): Versatile analytical techniques to identify the archived elemental information in human teeth. Microchem. J. 2005, 81, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jernvall, J.; Thesleff, I. Tooth shape formation and tooth renewal: Evolving with the same signals. Development 2012, 139, 3487–3497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Moradian-Oldak, J. Protein-mediated enamel mineralization. Front. Biosci. 2012, 17, 1996–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Iijima, M.; Fan, D.; Bromley, K.M.; Sun, Z.; Moradian-Oldak, J. Tooth enamel proteins enamelin and amelogenin cooperate to regulate the growth morphology of octacalcium phosphate crystals. Cryst. Growth Des. 2010, 10, 4815–4822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Ding, L.; Han, S.; Wang, K.; Zheng, S.; Zheng, W.; Peng, X.; Niu, Y.; Li, W.; Zhang, L. Remineralization of enamel caries by an amelogenin-derived peptide and fluoride in vitro. Regen. Biomater. 2020, 7, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Mukherjee, K.; Visakan, G.; Phark, J.-H.; Moradian-Oldak, J. Enhancing Collagen Mineralization with Amelogenin Peptide: Toward the Restoration of Dentin. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 6, 2251–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Park, E.-S.; Cho, H.-S.; Kwon, T.-G.; Jang, S.-N.; Lee, S.-H.; An, C.-H.; Shin, H.-I.; Kim, J.-Y.; Cho, J.-Y. Proteomics analysis of human dentin reveals distinct protein expression profiles. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 1338–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jágr, M.; Eckhardt, A.; Pataridis, S.; Mikšík, I. Comprehensive proteomic analysis of human dentin. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2012, 120, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Eckhardt, A.; Jágr, M.; Pataridis, S.; Mikšík, I. Proteomic analysis of human tooth pulp: Proteomics of human tooth. J. Endod. 2014, 40, 1961–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chun, S.Y.; Lee, H.J.; Choi, Y.A.; Kim, K.M.; Baek, S.H.; Park, H.S.; Kim, J.-Y.; Ahn, J.-M.; Cho, J.-Y.; Cho, D.-W. Analysis of the soluble human tooth proteome and its ability to induce dentin/tooth regeneration. Tissue Eng. Part A 2011, 17, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Szklarczyk, D.; Gable, A.L.; Lyon, D.; Junge, A.; Wyder, S.; Huerta-Cepas, J.; Simonovic, M.; Doncheva, N.T.; Morris, J.H.; Bork, P.; et al. STRING v11: Protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D607–D613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lane, D.; Peach, D. Some observations on the trace element concentrations in human dental enamel. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 1997, 60, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kampa, M.; Castanas, E. Human health effects of air pollution. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 151, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Malczewska‒Toth, B. Phosphorus, Selenium, Tellurium, and Sulfur. Patty Toxicol. 2012, 841–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cook, J.; Layrisse, M.; Martinez-Torres, C.; Walker, R.; Monsen, E.; Finch, C. Food iron absorption measured by an extrinsic tag. J. Clin. Investig. 1972, 51, 805–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Elkabouss, K.; Kacimi, M.; Ziyad, M.; Ammar, S.; Bozon-Verduraz, F. Cobalt-exchanged hydroxyapatite catalysts: Magnetic studies, spectroscopic investigations, performance in 2-butanol and ethane oxidative dehydrogenations. J. Catal. 2004, 226, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Świetlicka, I.; Tomaszewska, E.; Muszyński, S.; Valverde Piedra, J.L.; Świetlicki, M.; Prószyński, A.; Cieślak, K.; Wiącek, D.; Szymańczyk, S.; Kamiński, D. The effect of cadmium exposition on the structure and mechanical properties of rat incisors. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0215370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Borella, P.; Fantuzzi, G.; Aggazzotti, G. Trace elements in saliva and dental caries in young adults. Sci. Total Environ. 1994, 153, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sighinolfi, G.P.; Gorgoni, C.; Bonori, O.; Cantoni, E.; Martelli, M.; Simonetti, L. Comprehensive determination of trace elements in human saliva by ETA-AAS. Microchim. Acta 1989, 97, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Little, M.F.; Steadman, L.T. Chemical and physical properties of altered and sound enamel—IV: Trace element composition. Arch. Oral Biol. 1966, 11, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alfrey, A.C.; LeGendre, G.R.; Kaehny, W.D. The dialysis encephalopathy syndrome. Possible aluminum intoxication. N. Engl. J. Med. 1976, 294, 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lynch, R.J. Zinc in the mouth, its interactions with dental enamel and possible effects on caries; a review of the literature. Int. Dent. J. 2011, 61, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Odanaka, H.; Obama, T.; Sawada, N.; Sugano, M.; Itabe, H.; Yamamoto, M. Comparison of protein profiles of the pellicle, gingival crevicular fluid, and saliva: Possible origin of pellicle proteins. Biol. Res. 2020, 53, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Partanen, A.-M.; Thesleff, I. Transferrin and tooth morphogenesis: Retention of transferrin by mouse embryonic teeth in organ culture. Differentiation 1987, 34, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kaur, J.; Reinhardt, D.P. Extracellular Matrix (ECM) Molecules. In Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering in Dental Sciences; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 25–45. [Google Scholar]
  44. Sahlberg, C.; Aukhil, I.; Thesleff, I. Tenascin-C in developing mouse teeth: Expression of splice variants and stimulation by TGFβ and FGF. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2001, 109, 114–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tucker, R.P.; Degen, M. The Expression and Possible Functions of Tenascin-W During Development and Disease. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ueno, A.; Yamashita, K.; Nagata, T.; Tsurumi, C.; Miwa, Y.; Kitamura, S.; Inoue, H. cDNA cloning of bovine thrombospondin 1 and its expression in odontoblasts and predentin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1998, 1382, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yuasa, K.; Fukumoto, S.; Kamasaki, Y.; Yamada, A.; Fukumoto, E.; Kanaoka, K.; Saito, K.; Harada, H.; Arikawa-Hirasawa, E.; Miyagoe-Suzuki, Y. Laminin α2 is essential for odontoblast differentiation regulating dentin sialoprotein expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 10286–10292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Hormia, M.; Sahlberg, C.; Thesleff, I.; Airenne, T. The epithelium-tooth interface--a basal lamina rich in laminin-5 and lacking other known laminin isoforms. J. Dent. Res. 1998, 77, 1479–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Saito, K.; Fukumoto, E.; Yamada, A.; Yuasa, K.; Yoshizaki, K.; Iwamoto, T.; Saito, M.; Nakamura, T.; Fukumoto, S. Interaction between fibronectin and β1 integrin is essential for tooth development. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0121667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Zhang, X.; Du, Y.; Ling, J.; Li, W.; Liao, Y.; Wei, X. Dickkopf-related protein 3 negatively regulates the osteogenic differentiation of rat dental follicle cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 15, 1673–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Ablooglu, A.J.; Kang, J.; Handin, R.I.; Traver, D.; Shattil, S.J. The zebrafish vitronectin receptor: Characterization of integrin αV and β3 expression patterns in early vertebrate development. Dev. Dyn. Off. Publ. Am. Assoc. Anat. 2007, 236, 2268–2276. [Google Scholar]
  52. Fabian, T.; Fejerdy, P.; Csermely, P. Salivary genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics: The emerging concept of the oral ecosystem and their use in the early diagnosis of cancer and other diseases. Curr. Genomics 2008, 9, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lamkin, M.S.; Oppenheim, F.G. Structural features of salivary function. Crit. Rev.Oral Biol. Med. 1993, 4, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jungblut, P.R.; Holzhütter, H.G.; Apweiler, R.; Schlüter, H. The speciation of the proteome. Chem. Central J. 2008, 2, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Schlüter, H.; Apweiler, R.; Holzhütter, H.G.; Jungblut, P.R. Finding one’s way in proteomics: A protein species nomenclature. Chem. Central J. 2009, 3, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Duverger, O.; Beniash, E.; Morasso, M.I. Keratins as components of the enamel organic matrix. Matrix Biol. 2016, 52, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Duverger, O.; Ohara, T.; Shaffer, J.R.; Donahue, D.; Zerfas, P.; Dullnig, A.; Crecelius, C.; Beniash, E.; Marazita, M.L.; Morasso, M.I. Hair keratin mutations in tooth enamel increase dental decay risk. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 5219–5224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Ohsaki, Y.; Nagata, K. Type III collagen is a major component of interodontoblastic fibers of the developing mouse molar root. Anat. Rec. 1994, 240, 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Asaka, T.; Akiyama, M.; Domon, T.; Nishie, W.; Natsuga, K.; Fujita, Y.; Abe, R.; Kitagawa, Y.; Shimizu, H. Type XVII collagen is a key player in tooth enamel formation. Am. J. Pathol. 2009, 174, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Huynh, N.C.-N.; Everts, V.; Ampornaramveth, R.S. Histone deacetylases and their roles in mineralized tissue regeneration. Bone Rep. 2017, 7, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Assiry, A.A.; Albalawi, A.M.; Zafar, M.S.; Khan, S.D.; Ullah, A.; Almatrafi, A.; Ramzan, K.; Basit, S. KMT2C, a histone methyltransferase, is mutated in a family segregating non-syndromic primary failure of tooth eruption. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomolecules 10 01540 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic illustration to highlight the process of mineral and organic molecules identification within different teeth through ICP-MS and mass spectrometry-based methodologies.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration to highlight the process of mineral and organic molecules identification within different teeth through ICP-MS and mass spectrometry-based methodologies.
Biomolecules 10 01540 g001
Biomolecules 10 01540 g002 550
Figure 2. Comparative ICP-MS profile of four different types of teeth. Ten different trace elements were quantified. The vertical axis shows the amount of trace elements in micrograms/gram dry weight and on the horizontal axis are different teeth types where I: incisor; P: premolar; M: molar and C: canine teeth respectively. The standard deviation of three independent experiments was plotted as error bars.
Figure 2. Comparative ICP-MS profile of four different types of teeth. Ten different trace elements were quantified. The vertical axis shows the amount of trace elements in micrograms/gram dry weight and on the horizontal axis are different teeth types where I: incisor; P: premolar; M: molar and C: canine teeth respectively. The standard deviation of three independent experiments was plotted as error bars.
Biomolecules 10 01540 g002
Biomolecules 10 01540 g003 550
Figure 3. Comparative analysis of differential proteome within four types of human teeth. (a) Levels of protein abundance are depicted through (a) heatmap; (b) correlation plot; (c) principal component analysis (PCA); (d) Venn diagram. The different protein extracts notation is as follows I: incisor; P: premolar; M: molar and C: canine.
Figure 3. Comparative analysis of differential proteome within four types of human teeth. (a) Levels of protein abundance are depicted through (a) heatmap; (b) correlation plot; (c) principal component analysis (PCA); (d) Venn diagram. The different protein extracts notation is as follows I: incisor; P: premolar; M: molar and C: canine.
Biomolecules 10 01540 g003
Biomolecules 10 01540 g004 550
Figure 4. Comparative abundance profile of some key proteins found within different teeth combinations. Only Log2 abundance values more than ±2 were taken. The box below each histogram shows key proteins that are high or low in their abundance. The different combinations of proteins are as follows: (a) canine vs incisor; (b) incisor vs molar; (c) molar vs premolar; (d) canine vs premolar; (e) incisor vs premolar and (f) canine vs molar. The error bar denotes the error from three independent technical replicates.
Figure 4. Comparative abundance profile of some key proteins found within different teeth combinations. Only Log2 abundance values more than ±2 were taken. The box below each histogram shows key proteins that are high or low in their abundance. The different combinations of proteins are as follows: (a) canine vs incisor; (b) incisor vs molar; (c) molar vs premolar; (d) canine vs premolar; (e) incisor vs premolar and (f) canine vs molar. The error bar denotes the error from three independent technical replicates.
Biomolecules 10 01540 g004
Biomolecules 10 01540 g005 550
Figure 5. The protein-protein interaction network of tooth proteins. Nodes represent proteins and edges represent the protein-protein associations. Upon k-mean clustering, four main clusters were visible, and these are encircled for better representation (Cluster I, II, III, IV).
Figure 5. The protein-protein interaction network of tooth proteins. Nodes represent proteins and edges represent the protein-protein associations. Upon k-mean clustering, four main clusters were visible, and these are encircled for better representation (Cluster I, II, III, IV).
Biomolecules 10 01540 g005
Biomolecules 10 01540 g006 550
Figure 6. Clustering of proteins using STRING is shown. The center cluster is from the common proteins obtained in our study. The database was also searched for already known interacting partners of key proteins like Fibrillin-1, Fibronectin and Tenascin.
Figure 6. Clustering of proteins using STRING is shown. The center cluster is from the common proteins obtained in our study. The database was also searched for already known interacting partners of key proteins like Fibrillin-1, Fibronectin and Tenascin.
Biomolecules 10 01540 g006
Table
Table 1. List of key proteins that are common among different teeth types. C: canine; I: incisor; M: molar; P: premolar.
Table 1. List of key proteins that are common among different teeth types. C: canine; I: incisor; M: molar; P: premolar.
Teeth TypeC:I:M:PC:M:IC:I:PM:I:PC:IC:MP:I
Key proteins common in different teeth typesCollagen alpha-1(Q99715), Fibrillin-1 (P35555), Fibronectin (P02751), Collagen alpha-2(P08123), Hemopexin (P02790), Superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn] (P00441), Serotransferrin (P02787), 60 kDa heat shock protein (P10809), Collagen alpha-1(P02452), Tenascin (P24821)Alpha-amylase 2B precursor (P19961), Resistin precursor (Q9HD89), Alpha-amylase 1 precursor (P04745)Versican core protein precursor (P13611), Vitronectin precursor (P04004), Prolow density lipoprotein receptor-related protein(Q07954), Thrombospondin-1 precursor (P07996), Collagen alpha-1(I) chain precursor (P02452), Filamin-A (P21333), Plasminogen precursor (P00747), Neutrophil defensin 3 precursor (P59666), Lactotransferrin precursor (P02788), Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein 1 precursor (P02763), Collagen alpha-1(XXVIII) chain precursor (Q2UY09), Neutrophil defensin 1 precursor (P59665), Tenascin-N precursor (Q9UQP3), Basement membrane-specific heparan sulfate (P98160), Prothrombin precursor (P00734)Various subtypes of Keratins (P02538, P13647, P04259, O95678, P48668), Protein S100 (P06702), Laminin (P11047), Galectin-3-binding protein (Q08380)Kininogen-1 precursor (P01042), Polyubiquitin-B precursor (P0CG47), Ubiquitin protein (P62987), Dickkopf-related protein 3 precursor (Q9UBP4)Nucleolar RNA helicase 2 (Q9NR30)Collagen alpha-2 (P08572), Aggrecan core protein(P16112), Filamin-B (O75369), Thrombospondin (Q6ZMP0), Zinc-alpha-2-glycoprotein (P25311)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sharma, V.; Rastogi, S.; Kumar Bhati, K.; Srinivasan, A.; Roychoudhury, A.; Nikolajeff, F.; Kumar, S. Mapping the Inorganic and Proteomic Differences among Different Types of Human Teeth: A Preliminary Compositional Insight. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1540. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10111540

AMA Style

Sharma V, Rastogi S, Kumar Bhati K, Srinivasan A, Roychoudhury A, Nikolajeff F, Kumar S. Mapping the Inorganic and Proteomic Differences among Different Types of Human Teeth: A Preliminary Compositional Insight. Biomolecules. 2020; 10(11):1540. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10111540

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sharma, Vaibhav, Simran Rastogi, Kaushal Kumar Bhati, Alagiri Srinivasan, Ajoy Roychoudhury, Fredrik Nikolajeff, and Saroj Kumar. 2020. "Mapping the Inorganic and Proteomic Differences among Different Types of Human Teeth: A Preliminary Compositional Insight" Biomolecules 10, no. 11: 1540. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10111540

APA Style

Sharma, V., Rastogi, S., Kumar Bhati, K., Srinivasan, A., Roychoudhury, A., Nikolajeff, F., & Kumar, S. (2020). Mapping the Inorganic and Proteomic Differences among Different Types of Human Teeth: A Preliminary Compositional Insight. Biomolecules, 10(11), 1540. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10111540

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop