Next Article in Journal
CD44: A Multifunctional Mediator of Cancer Progression
Next Article in Special Issue
Surfactant Protein-G in Wildtype and 3xTg-AD Mice: Localization in the Forebrain, Age-Dependent Hippocampal Dot-like Deposits and Brain Content
Previous Article in Journal
Reiterating the Emergence of Noncoding RNAs as Regulators of the Critical Hallmarks of Gall Bladder Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Symptomatic, Genetic, and Mechanistic Overlaps between Autism and Alzheimer’s Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Probing the Influence of Single-Site Mutations in the Central Cross-β Region of Amyloid β (1–40) Peptides

1
Institute for Medical Physics and Biophysics, Leipzig University, Härtelstr. 16–18, D-04107 Leipzig, Germany
2
Department of Chemical Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Mumbai 400005, India
3
Institute of Anatomy, Leipzig University, Liebigstr. 13, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
4
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Hyderabad, 36/P Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Hyderabad 500046, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2021, 11(12), 1848; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11121848
Submission received: 5 November 2021 / Revised: 2 December 2021 / Accepted: 7 December 2021 / Published: 9 December 2021

Abstract

:
Amyloid β (Aβ) is a peptide known to form amyloid fibrils in the brain of patients suffering from Alzheimer’s disease. A complete mechanistic understanding how Aβ peptides form neurotoxic assemblies and how they kill neurons has not yet been achieved. Previous analysis of various Aβ40 mutants could reveal the significant importance of the hydrophobic contact between the residues Phe19 and Leu34 for cell toxicity. For some mutations at Phe19, toxicity was completely abolished. In the current study, we assessed if perturbations introduced by mutations in the direct proximity of the Phe19/Leu34 contact would have similar relevance for the fibrillation kinetics, structure, dynamics and toxicity of the Aβ assemblies. To this end, we rationally modified positions Phe20 or Gly33. A small library of Aβ40 peptides with Phe20 mutated to Lys, Tyr or the non-proteinogenic cyclohexylalanine (Cha) or Gly33 mutated to Ala was synthesized. We used electron microscopy, circular dichroism, X-ray diffraction, solid-state NMR spectroscopy, ThT fluorescence and MTT cell toxicity assays to comprehensively investigate the physicochemical properties of the Aβ fibrils formed by the modified peptides as well as toxicity to a neuronal cell line. Single mutations of either Phe20 or Gly33 led to relatively drastic alterations in the Aβ fibrillation kinetics but left the global, as well as the local structure, of the fibrils largely unchanged. Furthermore, the introduced perturbations caused a severe decrease or loss of cell toxicity compared to wildtype Aβ40. We suggest that perturbations at position Phe20 and Gly33 affect the fibrillation pathway of Aβ40 and, thereby, influence the especially toxic oligomeric species manifesting so that the region around the Phe19/Leu34 hydrophobic contact provides a promising site for the design of small molecules interfering with the Aβ fibrillation pathway.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Fibrillation of the amyloid β (Aβ) peptide is considered the most important molecular hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [1]. Developing small molecules or antibodies that alter or inhibit this fibrillation process in a solution has largely failed in the last decade. Until now, there is only one drug available which was recently FDA-approved with a somewhat controversial clinical outcome [2]. One of the reasons for the highly unsatisfactory situation is that our understanding of the structural characteristics of the Aβ oligomer and fibril formation and how it causes neuronal toxicity remains rather poor. In particular, the structural intermediates evolving during the aggregation process which have been assessed as being the key malign species are highly transient and diversified rendering them a scientific subject that features even more obscurity and necessitates further investigation and research. Any structural information about the Aβ peptide conversion into oligomers and finally fibrils is considered crucial for developing new strategies for tackling AD [3,4,5].
A key point for the understanding of the molecular details of amyloid formation from individual peptides is to disclose the role of individual amino acids and local molecular contacts between the amino acid side chains for the peptide’s structure formation properties and especially its toxicity. One approach addressing this question is to rationally modify the peptide sequence via single mutations to cause local physical perturbations to the peptide structure [6,7,8,9,10]. This way, the various electrostatic and hydrophobic forces that control the fibrillation pathway and entail the amyloid stability are altered and the consequential effect of single mutations on important Aβ peptide characteristics can be investigated. Critical amino acids as well as structurally important regions and contacts within the structure of the peptide assembly can be defined and characterized.
We have recently systematically investigated Aβ40 peptide mutants that carried alterations in the most often described hydrophobic contact between Phe19 and Leu34 [11,12,13,14,15,16,17], which allowed for comparing the fibrillation kinetics, the global structure and morphology, the local structure near the mutation site and the cell toxicity of mutated Aβ peptides with wildtype (WT) Aβ40. With these models, we could reveal the high significance of the hydrophobic contact between Phe19 and Leu34 for the formation of Aβ40 oligomers and fibrils. The importance of Phe19 for the formation of a lowly populated disordered 3–10 helix was also demonstrated [18].
Single mutations of Phe19 to other natural amino acids led to significant alterations in the fibrillation kinetics, while leaving the morphology of the fibrils largely unchanged [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. However, the secondary structure and local dynamics in the vicinity of the mutated site changed rather drastically for some of the mutants [14]. The most important result was that rather conservative mutations completely abolished the toxicity of the Aβ40 species [13]. We then mutated the residue Leu34 to D-Leu, Ile or Val, all representing very minor modifications and, consequently, observed no structural or morphological alterations of the fibrils and toxicity values close to WT [15]. These experiments suggested that Phe19 may carry significant importance in the formation of toxic oligomers. This hypothesis was further probed by replacing Phe19 by non-natural amino acids with varying ring structures [16]. These molecules showed very accelerated fibrillation kinetics but largely attenuated toxicity supporting the hypothesis that Aβ40 toxicity is highly dependent on the residue Phe19.
Taken together, the aforementioned results suggest that the toxicity of Aβ40 may strongly depend on the early folding contact between Phe19 and Leu34. In the current study, this hypothesis was challenged. In particular, we asked the question as to how specific the effects of mutations of Phe19 and Leu34 are to these amino acids and if similar effects are also obtained if two neighboring residues in position 20 (Phe20) or 33 (Gly33) were mutated. To this end, we created a small library of Aβ40 peptide mutants where Phe20 or Gly33 were replaced by residues that showed the most drastic effects in the previous study [11,12,16].
Both amino acids are located in direct proximity to the Phe19/Leu34 contact but the Phe20 side chain points out of the fibril core according to the current models of Aβ40 [19,20,21,22]. It should be mentioned that there is also one model describing the Phe20 side chain to point into the fibrillar core [21]. Any side chain that is introduced into position 33 should also point outwards. The residues chosen to replace Phe20 were (i) Lys, (ii) Tyr and (iii) the non-proteinogenic cyclohexylalanine (Cha). With this choice of side chains, we were able to first study the effect of electrostatics by introducing the positively charged Lys; second, the possibility to adopt an altered hydrogen bond pattern by introducing aromatic Tyr; third, the role of π stacking and aromaticity by mutation to cyclohexylalanine (Cha) where the aromatic phenyl ring is replaced by the saturated cyclohexyl moiety. The mutation introduced to replace Gly33 was Ala, which represents the most conservative mutation in this position. Therefore, we aimed to obtain a detailed view on the role of this amino acid within the structure of the Aβ40 peptide assembly to assess if it might be worth further investigations.
We used fluorescence spectroscopy to monitor fibrillation kinetics, X-ray diffraction and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to investigate the effect of the alterations in local physical forces on the cross-β structure as well as the global secondary structure and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to examine the fibril morphology in response to the mutational changes. The consequences of these modifications on the local structure and dynamics were probed by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Finally, standard MTT assays were carried out to determine the influence of these modifications on the cellular toxicity of the peptides.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Peptides Synthesis

WT Aβ40 peptides (DAEFRHDSGY EVHHQKLVFF AEDVGSNKGA IIGLMVGGVV) and Aβ40 mutants were synthesized using standard F-moc solid phase synthesis. The purity was >98%, tested by HPLC and MS-spectroscopy. Four Aβ40 peptides with mutations at either Phe20 or Gly33 (indicated in bold in the sequence above) were synthesized with uniformly 13C/15N-labeled amino acids (Euriso-TOP; Saarbrücken, Germany) at position Val18, Phe19 and Ala21 (underlined in the sequence above). In three mutants, Phe20 was replaced by either Lys, Tyr or cyclohexylalanine (Cha). In the fourth mutant, residue Gly33 was replaced by Ala. The mutated amino acids are indicated with bold letters in the sequence above. An alternatively labeled peptide version of the fourth mutant was synthesized with uniformly 13C/15N-labeled amino acids at position Phe19, Asp23, Gly25, Leu34 and uniformly 15N-labeled amino acid at position Lys28.

2.2. Sample Preparation for NMR Spectroscopy, X-ray Diffraction Measurements and Transmission Electron Microscopy of Aβ Fibrils

Lyophilized peptides were dissolved in aqueous buffer containing 25 mM of sodium phosphate, 150 mM of sodium chloride and 0.01% of sodium azide at a concentration of 1 mg/mL at pH 9.2. Directly after complete solubilization, the peptide solutions were dialyzed against the same buffer at pH 7.4 for 4 h with a buffer exchange after 2 h. For dialysis, 1000 Da molecular weight cut-off dialyses tubes (ZelluTrans/ROTH; Karlsruhe, Germany) were used. The peptide solutions were then transferred into reaction tubes and incubated at 37 °C for ≥7 days while continuously shaken at 450 rpm (Thermomixer comfort, Eppendorf; Köln/Wesseling, Germany).
For NMR measurements, fibril solutions were centrifuged at 81,500× g for 2 h at 4 °C. After removal of the supernatant, pellets were lyophilized for at least 72 h, rehydrated to 50 wt% H2O, homogenized by freezing in liquid nitrogen and thawed at 37 °C ten times and transferred into 3.2 mm MAS rotors and stored at −24 °C.
For X-ray diffraction measurements fibril solutions were centrifuged at 15,060× g for 10 s and washed with H2O three times. Approximately 10 µL of highly concentrated fibril solution was pipetted between two paraffin coated glass capillaries and slowly dried in a desiccator to give the fibrils time to collimate.
For transmission electron microscopy, fibril solutions were diluted 1:20 with H2O, then 2 µL were applied onto a formvar film-coated copper grid, dried for 30 min and subsequently stained with 1% uranyl acetate in pure water.

2.3. Sample Preparation for NMR Spectroscopy of Aβ Oligomers

For Aβ oligomer preparation [23], approximately 5 mg of lyophilized peptides were dissolved in 1 mL of ammonia solution at pH 11. Aqueous buffer containing 175 mM of ammonium acetate (pH 7.4) was added to a final peptide concentration of 0.17 mg/mL. The peptide solution was incubated for 30 min at room temperature without shaking and then dripped into liquid nitrogen to stop the oligomerization process and prevent fibrillation. The flash-frozen sample was lyophilized for 4 days to remove the water and the buffer. The obtained powder was transferred into a 3.2 mm MAS rotor and stored at −24 °C.

2.4. Fibrillation Kinetics Measurements by ThT-Fluorescence Assay

For recording the Aβ40 fibrillation kinetics, Thioflavin T (ThT) was used as a fluorescence dye which shows an increased quantum yield at 482 nm under excitation at 440 nm when bound to cross-β structures, exhibited by mature Aβ fibrils [24]. Lyophilized peptides were first dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (30 µg peptide/µL DMSO). The DMSO-peptide solution was then diluted with buffer containing 25 mM of sodium phosphate, 150 mM of sodium chloride, 0.01% of sodium azide and 20 µM of ThT at pH 7.4 to a final peptide concentration of 30 µM. Fluorescence spectra were recorded using a Tecan Infinite M200 microplate reader (Tecan Group AG; Männedorf, Switzerland) and a 96-well plate format. For each measurement, 100 µL of the peptide solution were incubated at 37 °C under an applied shaking cycle of 2 s shaking (2 mm shaking amplitude and 579.8 rpm) followed by a 5 min waiting period. The fluorescence intensity was measured every 5 min. Empty wells were filled with H2O to prevent dehydration of the sample. Fluorescence intensity measurements were carried out in three independent measurements in quintuplicate for each peptide. Intensity data were normalized for each sample so that the values ranged between 0 and 1. The data were fitted using a sigmoidal curve according to
I = y i + m i t + y f + m f t 1 + e [ ( t t 0 ) / τ ]
where I is the normalized fluorescence intensity, t the time, t0 the characteristic time, where half the maximal intensity is reached, m the slope of the graph in lag time ( m i ) and plateau phase ( m f ). τ represents a measure of the fibrillation time from which the lag time is calculated by tlag = t0 − 2 × τ and the fibrillation time is calculated by tfib = 4 × τ [25].

2.5. Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy

Lyophilized peptides were dissolved in buffer containing 25 mM of sodium phosphate, 150 mM of sodium chloride and 0.01% of sodium azide at a concentration of 1 mg/mL at pH 7.4. Aliquots of the peptide solutions were used either directly for CD measurements in the beginning of the fibrillation period or after ≥13 days of incubation at 37 °C and 450 rpm. Aliquots were diluted with H2O for CD measurements. Reported values represent the mean of two independent measurements with a final peptide concentration of 20 μM and 10 μM. CD spectra were recorded in a 2 mm quartz cuvette on a Jasco J-710 spectropolarimeter at 25 °C. All measurements were carried out fivefold.

2.6. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

TEM-Images were obtained using a Zeiss SIGMA microscope equipped with a STEM detector and Atlas Software (Zeiss NTS; Oberkochen, Germany).

2.7. X-ray Diffraction Measurements

Measurements were carried out using a copper rotating anode MM007 with 0.8 kW as the goniometer head and R-AXIS IV++ as the image plate detector (Rigaku; Tokyo, Japan). The exposure time was 3 min at 24 °C.

2.8. Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy

NMR spectra were acquired using a Bruker Avance III 600 MHz NMR spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin GmbH; Rheinstetten, Germany) operating at a resonance frequency of 60.8 MHz for 15N, 150.9 MHz for 13C and 600.1 MHz for 1H or a Bruker Avance Neo 700 MHz NMR spectrometer (Bruker Biospin GmbH; Rheinstetten, Germany) operating at a resonance frequency of 70.9 MHz for 15N, 176.1 MHz for 13C and 700.1 MHz for 1H both under magic-angle spinning (MAS). A triple channel 3.2 mm MAS probe was used. MAS frequencies were 5 kHz for DIPSHIFT experiments and 11.777 kHz for all other experiments. The temperature was set to 30 °C. The pulse lengths of the 90° pulses were set to 4 µs for 1H, 4 µs for 13C and 5 µs or 6 µs for 15N. 1H-X CP contact times were 700 µs for DIPSHIFT experiments and 1000 µs for all other experiments at a spin lock field of approximately 50 kHz. The relaxation delay was 2.5 s. 1H dipolar decoupling was applied with a rf amplitude of 65 kHz using SPINAL64 during acquisition.
Two dimensional 13C-13C DARR experiments and 13C-15N correlation spectra were performed simultaneously using dual-acquisition [26]. The DARR mixing time was 500 ms. Alongside each DARR experiment, 4 or 8 13C-15N correlation spectra were acquired with a CP contact time of 4 ms for 13C-15N transfer.
1H-13C dipolar coupling measurements were carried out using constant time DIPSHIFT experiments [27]. The frequency switched Lee–Goldburg sequence (FSLG) [28] with an effective rf field of 80 kHz was applied for homonuclear decoupling during dipolar evolution. The strength of the dipolar coupling was obtained from numerical simulations of the dephasing curves for each resolved carbon atom. Order parameters were calculated by dividing the results by reference values for the rigid limits [29].
13C-15N frequency selective REDOR experiments [30] were conducted on a Bruker Avance III 700 MHz spectrometer at an MAS frequency of 8.333 kHz. 13C π pulses were 10.5 µs and the carbonyl selective pulse was 500 µs long. ΔS/S curves were simulated assuming only an isolated 13C-15N contact.

2.9. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromid (MTT) Assay

The standard MTT assay was carried out to determine the viability of cells treated with the Aβ (1–40) peptide variants. RN46A cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well and cultivated for 24 h. After attachment, the cells were treated with either the vehicle control or the Aβ (1–40) WT and mutant species at 100 µM for 60 h at 37 °C. Subsequently, MTT solution (1 mg/mL in PBS) was added into each well and cells were incubated at 37 °C for 4 h. The MTT solution was aspirated and 100 µL of acidified isopropanol was added to each well. The plate was gently shaken on an orbital shaker for 20 min to completely dissolve the formazan precipitation. Absorbance was detected at 570 nm using a microplate reader (TECAN Infinite M200, Redmond, WA, USA). Absorbance was normalized with respect to the untreated control cultures to calculate changes in cell viability. Three replicates were prepared, i.e., three different experiments, with six wells each for each peptide.

3. Results

3.1. Fibrillation Kinetics

The fibrillation kinetics of all Aβ40 peptide variants were studied using the standard Thioflavin T (ThT) fluorescence assay. A plot of the normalized fluorescence intensity of WT and mutated Aβ40 peptides as a function of time is given in Figure 1. The Gly33Ala, Phe20Tyr and Phe20Lys mutants showed faster fibrillation kinetics compared to WT Aβ40. For the Phe20Cha variant slower fibrillation kinetics were observed.
In a three-step model, amyloid fibril formation can be described as a transient process that starts with a lag phase followed by a fibrillation phase, which equilibrates to the plateau phase. While the lag phase represents early forms of organization of the Aβ peptide, the growth of the fibrils typically leads to a steeply increasing curve progression described as sigmoidal increase caused by the enhancement of the fibrillation process due to already emerged seeds and early fibrils.
From the measurements, we obtained two kinetic parameters that characterize the fibrillation process: the lag time corresponding to the length of the lag phase and the characteristic time indicating the time required to reach half the maximal ThT fluorescence intensity. For WT Aβ40 under our conditions, we observed a lag time of 7.3 ± 2.4 h and a characteristic time of 9.0 ± 2.0 h. The Gly33Ala and Phe20Tyr mutants exhibited significantly decreased lag and characteristic times compared to WT Aβ40 with the strongest decrease in Gly33Ala (tlag~0; tchar = 1.5 ± 0.5 h), followed by Phe20Tyr (tlag = 3.8 ± 1.3 h; tchar = 5.3 ± 1.2 h). The Phe20Lys mutant (tlag = 4.9 ± 1.0 h; tchar = 7.3 ± 0.8 h) showed accelerated fibrillation kinetics as well. Only the Phe20Cha mutant (tlag = 13.5 ± 3.1 h; tchar = 14.9 ± 2.8 h) featured a significantly decelerated fibrillation kinetics compared to WT (p < 0.005%). We detected the typical sigmoidal increase in ThT fluorescence intensity for the WT Aβ peptide as well as the variants Phe20Tyr, Phe20Lys and Phe20Cha. In the Gly33Ala mutant, no lag time and no sigmoidal increase in ThT fluorescence intensity was observed in our assay which comprised a dead time of approximately five minutes before the first measurement was performed.

3.2. Transmission Electron Microscopy

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to study the general fibril morphology. Electron micrographs of all variants are shown in Figure 2A–E. The TEM images confirm that WT Aβ40 peptides as well as all mutants formed fibrils of comparable morphology. The Phe20Cha and Phe20Lys mutants showed similar morphology as the WT while the fibrils of Phe20Tyr appeared somehow longer and arranged themselves in a more parallel manner. This is in contrast to the Gly33Ala mutant fibrils, which appeared shorter and overlapped more. We determined the average fibril diameters of all variants from the TEM images. Fibril diameters of the WT (10.4 ± 1.1 nm) and Gly33Ala variant (11.5 ± 1.4 nm) were almost equal. All three studied mutations at Phe20 led to an increase in the diameter (Phe20Cha: 13.6 ± 1.6 nm; Phe20Tyr: 14.3 ± 1.1 nm; Phe20Lys: 15.5 ± 1.6 nm).

3.3. X-ray Diffraction

A more detailed view on the global structure of the mutated Aβ40 fibrils was provided by X-ray diffraction. X-ray diffraction data of all Aβ40 peptides is presented in Figure 2F–J. All Aβ mutants featured similar XRD spectra as the WT peptide and prove that the cross-β structure of amyloids, which is formed by two stacked β-sheets, is formed by all mutated peptides. In particular, the spectra show a strong meridional reflection at ~4.7 Å, indicating the intrasheet distance between the neighboring β-strands corresponding to the hydrogen bond length and a broader equatorial reflection from ~9.5 to 10.3 Å indicating the distance between the two opposing β-strands. The meridional reflection in all variants was well-defined at 4.6 or 4.7 Å in agreement with the regular β-sheet structure of the WT and mutated fibrils. The more diffuse equatorial reflection was observed in WT fibrils at approximately 9.5 Å and in the mutants at 9.8 Å (Phe20Lys), 10.0 Å (Phe20Cha; Gly33Ala) and 10.3 Å (Phe20Tyr).
The X-ray diffraction data reveals that the global structure of the WT Aβ40 fibrils prevailed throughout the mutants and that the cross-β structure of Aβ40 is very resistant against local perturbations introduced by our single mutations.

3.4. Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy

CD measurements were carried out at two different time points to obtain information about the secondary structure directly after diluting the peptides in the phosphate buffer and after a fibrillation time of 13 or more days under standard conditions. The freshly dissolved peptides all exhibited a strong negative peak at ~197 nm, characteristic for random coil structure in the disordered peptides (Figure 3A). After incubation, the spectra of all variants changed drastically, featuring a minimum at ~216–227 nm and a maximum at ~196 nm (Figure 3B). This indicated a transition to β-sheet secondary structure [31].

3.5. Local Structure of the Aβ40 Fibrils by 13C NMR Chemical Shift Measurements

To examine the local structure of mutated Aβ40, peptide variants with 13C/15N-labels at selected positions (Val18, Phe19 and Ala21) were fibrillated and studied using solid-state NMR spectroscopy. For all samples, we obtained well-resolved one-dimensional 13C CP MAS NMR spectra. The corresponding NMR spectra featured relatively well-resolved NMR lines indicating moderate polymorphism in the local structure. We were able to assign all chemical shift values to the labeled carbons from the two-dimensional 13C–13C correlation NMR spectra (DARR experiment). These chemical shifts represent a measure of the local secondary structure since the dihedral angles of the peptide backbones influenced the magnetic environment of the nuclei, especially the 13Cα, 13Cβ and 13CO position [32]. To be independent of external referencing, 13Cα–13Cβ chemical shift differences [33] were calculated and are shown in Figure 4. Specific values for the respective amino acids indicating secondary structure motifs are also displayed. As apparent from Figure 4, WT Aβ40 fibrils featured well-defined β-sheet structure for the reported amino acids in agreement with the current models for Aβ40 fibrils [19,20,21,22]. All mutated variants did not show substantial deviations from the WT Aβ secondary structure for the reported amino acids. All determined values were in agreement with β-sheet structure.
The structural homogeneity of all preparations is particularly obvious at position Val18, with values from 25.5–26.1 ppm for the 13Cα–13Cβ chemical shift differences in all variants. Residues Phe19 and Ala21, covalently bound to the amino acid in position 20, were mutated in most of the peptides. 13Cα–13Cβ chemical shift difference values at position Phe19 ranged from 12.8 to 14.9 ppm with the largest deviation from the WT (13.7 ppm) for Phe20Tyr (14.9 ppm) followed by Gly33Ala (14.5 ppm) and Phe20Lys (14.3 ppm). At position Ala21, very similar chemical shift differences were observed for the mutants with values from 26.9–29.0 ppm for all variants and the largest deviations from the WT (29.0 ppm) for Phe20Lys (26.9 ppm) and Phe20Tyr (27.0 ppm).
Chemical shift data for all variants and labeled amino acids suggest very homogenous local secondary structures of the various Aβ40 fibrils with slight deviations most likely in the Phe20Lys and Phe20Tyr mutants.

3.6. Investigation of the Molecular Dynamics of the Mutated Aβ40 Fibrils

In addition to secondary structure changes, the local dynamics of the labeled amino acids in the mutated fibrils could be modified by the introduced perturbations, e.g., due to altered side chain packing in the fibril core. The motional amplitude of the 13C–1H bond vectors was studied using the DIPSHIFT separated local field experiment, measuring motionally averaged dipolar coupling strengths of any labeled 13C–1H bond in the peptide backbone or side chain of the fibril. Partial motional averaging of the dipolar coupling strength is conveniently expressed as an order parameter (S), which is defined as the ratio of the detected, motionally averaged dipolar coupling and the full dipolar coupling in a completely rigid bond vector [34]. An order parameter of zero, therefore, is obtained for moving C-H bond vectors isotropically, while an order parameter of one indicates the absence of any motional amplitude with a correlation time of less than ~40 µs.
Segmental order parameters for the labeled segments are illustrated in Figure 5 for the backbone (A) and side chain carbons (B). No major differences in the order parameters of the labeled amino acids were observed between WT Aβ40 fibrils and the different mutants, proving again that the local structure of the fibrils as the final product of the folding pathway is mostly unaffected by the introduced perturbations.
The order parameters of the backbone carbons were highly rigid in all peptide variants in agreement with a stable cross-β structure for all Aβ fibrils as described in the literature [35]. The rigidity of the Phe19 Cβ and Val21 Cβ as well as the high flexibility of the phenyl ring and the Val18 Cγ/Ala21 Cβ in the side chain were retained as well. Noteworthy alterations were only observed in the Phe20 mutants. All three Phe20 mutants featured an increase in the order parameter of the Phe19 Cβ from 0.8 in WT fibrils to 1, indicating full rigidity of these β-carbons. Observed order parameters of S > 1 in the Ala21 Cα and Phe19 Cβ represent experimental errors as there is a theoretical limitation to S ≤ 1. It should be noted that dipolar couplings for the Val18 Cβ and Ala21 Cβ could not be separated. As methyl group rotation averages the order parameter to a minimal value of 0.33 the observed experimental order parameters of ~0.2 for these amino acids indicate additional averaging due to motions of the C–C bond.

3.7. Cell Toxicity of the Aβ40 Peptides

To investigate the cell toxicity of WT and mutated Aβ40 peptides, a standard MTT assay was carried out using the neuronal cell line RN46A. Figure 6 presents the relative cell viability of the variants in comparison to the control group. The cell viability of the control group was set to 100%. RN46A cells were incubated with freshly dissolved lyophilized peptides or with the vehicle for the control group, respectively. Thus, Aβ40 peptides were added as unfibrillated monomers/small intermediates.
The results of the MTT assay reveal great differences in the peptide toxicity between WT Aβ40 peptides and all tested mutants. As expected, and in agreement with the literature data, the WT peptide was highly toxic and led to a relative cell viability of 39.2 ± 10.3%. All mutations caused a severe decrease or loss of cell toxicity. The Phe2040 mutants were still toxic but to a lesser extent with a relative cell viability of 57.4 ± 7.0% for Phe20Lys, followed by 58.9 ± 10.8% for Phe20Tyr and 74.0 ± 4.6% for Phe20Cha. The variant Gly33Ala almost completely lost cell toxicity with a relative cell viability of 99.3 ± 6.8%.

3.8. Specific Structural Investigations on the Gly33Ala Variant

As the most drastic changes in fibrillation kinetics and cell toxicity occurred in the Gly33Ala variant, we investigated an alternatively 13C/15N-labeled version of the Gly33Ala variant with uniformly 13C/15N-labeled amino acids at position Phe19, Asp23, Gly25, Leu34 and uniformly 15N-labeled Lys28 using solid-state NMR distance measurements. We applied two different preparation protocols. First, we prepared mature Aβ fibrils as in the other experiments and, second, a protocol first introduced by Sarkar et al. [23] where oligomeric structures are prepared and fixed for NMR investigation. In particular, we looked at two important contacts well-described in WT Aβ40: the hydrophobic contact between Phe19 and Leu34 and the salt bridge between Asp23 and Lys28 [36,37].
The hydrophobic contact between Phe19 and Leu34 can be well-studied using the two-dimensional 13C–13C DARR experiment. Figure 7A shows a section of the DARR NMR spectra of fibrils and oligomers grown from the Gly33Ala mutant. A long mixing time of 500 ms was applied which allowed for the detection of interresidual contacts. As apparent from the figure, cross peaks between the Phe19 ring carbons and the Leu34 Cγ, Cδ1 and Cδ2 indicate magnetization transfer between these carbons, which emerged in the oligomeric as well as fibrillary structures, revealing a proximity of the two amino acids and, therefore, a molecular contact between residues Phe19 and Leu34 in both states.
The formation of a salt bridge between Asp23–Lys28 could be precisely examined in 13C–15N frequency selective REDOR NMR experiments measuring the distance between Asp 13COO and Lys 15NH3+ [14,30]. The results for Gly33Ala Aβ fibrils and oligomers are shown in Figure 7B. The 15N–13C distance could, therefore, be determined to approximately 4.1 Å in fibrils indicating the formation of a stable salt bridge and >7 Å in oligomers indicating that no salt bridge was formed.

4. Discussion

The Aβ40 peptide is known to form amyloid fibrils. The fibrillation process and the structure of mature fibrils have been shown to be astonishingly robust against local perturbations in the amino acid sequence [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. This is because the unifying structural motif of all amyloid fibrils, which is the cross-β structure, represents an energetically highly favorable structure [38,39]. In the past, it could be shown that this structure also prevails in most Aβ40 peptide mutants [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. The hydrophobic contact between Phe19 and Leu34 was found to form very early within the fibrillation process [13]. Rediscovered in various oligomeric structures, this contact seems to represent a first interaction site between hydrophobic domains, which later on results in the formation of the cross-β structure. Interestingly, Aβ40 peptides with single mutations of either Phe19 or Leu34 showed lower toxicity but left the general fibrillar structure largely unchanged. While mutations with altered ring structures like Phe19Cha or Phe19Nal reduced peptide toxicity [16], less conservative mutations like Phe19Gly, Phe19Trp or Phe19Tyr completely abolished the toxicity of Aβ40 [13]. Very conservative mutations of Leu34 (to D-Leu, Ile or Val) were investigated as well and showed only marginal alterations in toxicity [15]. Previous work led to the assumption that the Phe19/Leu34 contact, and Phe19 especially, harbors fundamental importance for peptide cellular toxicity [40]. This provokes the question: Is the Phe19/Leu34 contact isolated responsible for the propagation of peptide toxicity or can modifications in the neighboring amino acids cause similar effects? Therefore, we investigated two neighboring sites (Phe20 and Gly33). This allowed for separating the effects on the peptide’s characteristics between the contact itself and the direct vicinity. In the single mutants, Phe20 was replaced by Tyr, Lys or cyclohexylalanine because they showed the most drastic changes in the previous Phe19 mutants. Furthermore, Gly33 was mutated to Ala to introduce the smallest possible alteration at this site.
To first determine the effect of the mutation on the fibrillation process, we performed fibrillation kinetics measurements. Most of the tested mutants showed a shorter lag time and characteristic time compared to the WT Aβ peptide. The explanation of the partly drastic alteration of the fibrillation kinetics, especially in the Gly33Ala mutant, lies in the modification of the folding energy landscape resulting in an acceleration of kinetically relevant steps by destabilizing specific oligomeric structures and/or the emergence of alternative pathways with different oligomers [3,4,41]. The kinetics data suggest an importance of positions Phe20 as well as Gly33 for fibril growth and the formation and/or stabilization of intermediate species.
In previous studies, the effect of mutations of Phe to Tyr, Lys and Cha was already tested for position Phe19. Phe19Lys and Phe19Tyr showed an elongated lag time and characteristic time compared to WT [11]. In contrast, Phe20Lys and Phe20Tyr exhibited an acceleration of these kinetic parameters. Phe19Cha accelerated fibrillation [16], while Phe20Cha slowed it down. Since Phe19 points to the hydrophobic interior, mutations to less hydrophobic amino acids seem to slow down fibrillation, while position Phe20, pointing outside, seems to profit from more hydrophilic amino acids regarding fibrillation kinetics. It is known that for some proteins such as myoglobin [42] or alpha-lactalbumin [43], a folding process starts with creating localized regions of predominantly hydrophobic residues. It is still unknown how the folding process in Aβ40 is directed. The arrangement of hydrophilic and hydrophobic amino acids near Phe19/Leu34 clearly determines how fast the folding process can proceed.
The TEM results confirm that WT Aβ as well as the Aβ mutants formed fibrils of comparable morphology. X-ray diffraction exhibited a close similarity between the mesoscopic structure of all variants. In more detail, an increased fibril diameter was observed for the Phe20 mutants compared to the WT. This suggests slight structural differences between these variants. Two aspects are most likely affected by the mutations:
(i)
The equatorial reflection in XRD data that corresponds to the distance between the opposing β-strands suggests a slight increase of the intersheet distance but certainly not to an extent to explain the diameter alteration observed in the TEM images. The fact that Phe20 according to most Aβ40 models [19,44] points to the outside renders a strong influence on this distance unlikely. The moderate increase can be explained by very small packing differences between the opposing β-strands due to alterations in the interaction of the side chains inside the fibril;
(ii)
Current Aβ40 fibril models assume that the fibrils are formed of multiples (usually 2–8) of these opposing β-strands termed protofilaments. The protofilaments line up parallel to each other. The mutations to Phe20 may cause alterations of this agglomeration of the protofilaments. In the literature, different diameters for Aβ40 WT fibrils are reported depending on preparation protocols. These diameters could be associated with assumed numbers of protofilaments [44,45]. Although it is difficult to assess this further with the data provided by our experiments, we assume that the arrangement of the altered side chains in position 20 affects the alignment of the protofilaments.
Atomistic insight into the local fibril structure near the mutated site was achieved by solid-state NMR. WT and mutated Aβ fibrils featured clearly β-strand-like chemical shifts. Only minor differences between WT Aβ and the other variants occurred. The DIPSHIFT results suggest that the labeled backbone carbons are highly rigid in agreement with the stability of the cross-β structure. All three Phe20 mutants resulted in an increased order parameter of the Phe19 Cβ carbon compared to the WT. Slight packing differences occurring from the side chain alterations may have caused a constraint that restricted the motion of Phe19 Cβ and the location of the phenyl ring while the ring carbons remained flexible. Taken together, the local structure and dynamics near the mutation site Phe20 remained largely unaffected by the perturbations. Interestingly, the Gly33Ala mutant did not affect experimentally-determined chemical shifts or the flexibility of the labeled residues despite the more restricted dihedral backbone angles of Ala. Thus, Phe20 and Gly33 amino acids did not exert an important structural influence on Aβ40 fibrils.
Although the structure and morphology of the fibrils were only marginally altered, more pronounced effects could be manifested in the toxicity as this depends not on the structure of fibrils but of the oligomeric species. All mutated peptides showed lower toxicity compared to the WT. The Gly33Ala mutation completely abolished cell toxicity. Therefore, we investigated the structure of Gly33Ala oligomers and fibrils by additional solid-state NMR experiments. We applied a protocol to prepare Aβ oligomers [23] to reveal possible structural differences between oligomers of WT Aβ or the Gly33Ala variant. Other NMR-based methods involving pressure jump [46] or antibody binding [47] also represent attractive options to study these transient oligomeric states. The hydrophobic contact between Phe19 and Leu34 was shown to be preserved in oligomers as well as in fibrils. However, the salt bridge between Asp23 and Lys28 was only present in fibrils and not in the oligomers.
Our results show that not Phe19/Leu34 contact alone but also its periphery is crucial for Aβ toxicity. Even with a retained contact between Phe19 and Leu34, a fibrillation process through non-toxic intermediates can be achieved. Interestingly, mutational studies of Leu34 [15] reduced cell toxicity to a much lesser extent then in the Gly33Ala variant.
Combining the result from the toxicity assay with the other experiments, certain conclusions arise. Although the structural characteristics of the various fibrils remained largely unchanged, major effects in the fibrillation kinetics occurred. The fact that the final structure of the fibrillation pathway, Aβ fibrils, remained mainly unaffected implies that the perturbations affect mostly transient intermediates resulting in conformational changes on an oligomeric level in agreement with modifications in cell toxicity [48]. Previous work has identified trimers and tetramers as the major species under conditions similar to our toxicity experiments [49]. Another explanation which links the acceleration of the fibrillation process in the Gly33Ala mutant to the toxicity results may be the decreased lag time corresponding to a shorter lifetime of the toxic oligomeric species. Studies on Phe19 mutated Aβ40 peptides with an altered ring structure led to slight reductions of toxicity while no lag time was observable [16]. Major mutations of Phe19 extended the lag time and completely abolished toxicity [11,13]. A strong coherence between reduced lag time and reduced toxicity has so far not be observed. However, it is possible that through an altered folding landscape, toxic oligomers are destabilized and more transient.
The observation that the periphery of the Phe19/Leu34 contact plays a critical role for Aβ40 characteristics and toxicity suggests high potential for drug development. The first FDA-approved antibody aducanumab against Aβ is binding to the N terminus of the peptide [50]. While achieving good results in clearing Aβ fibrils from the brain, clinical outcome data remain rather poor [2]. This seems understandable because, from a pathophysiological perspective, the fibrils themselves represent a side product rather than the problem. The current and previous results [13,15,16] suggest that small molecules attacking the region around the Phe19/Leu34 contact could provide an alternative pharmaceutical strategy to reduce Aβ toxicity. The amino acids we found to be important for that region likely point to the fibril’s exterior and, therefore, are more easily accessible for pharmacological intervention than the Phe19/Leu34 contact in the fibrillar interior. Phe is a favorable motif for rational drug design since the aromatic ring provides interaction possibilities via various mechanisms such as π stacking, cation–π interactions and C-H–π interactions [51,52,53]. The abolished toxicity in the Gly33Ala variant and the reduced toxicity of the Phe20 mutants provide hope that it may be possible to engineer small molecules interfering with the folding energy landscape of Aβ40 to redirect the fibrillation process via non-toxic intermediates.
On a final note, it should be considered that the individual methods used here required different preparation concentrations and conditions. It is unlikely that fibrillation started from true Aβ monomers when incubated at higher concentrations. Monomeric conditions for Aβ40 arise only when the peptide is diluted to very low concentrations (≤150 nM, [54]).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.H.; data curation, J.F., D.S., M.K. and S.M.; methodology, D.H., D.S., M.K., H.A.S., P.K.M., K.R.M. and S.M.; formal analysis, J.F., D.S. and S.M.; investigation, J.F., M.K., D.S. and K.R.M.; writing—original draft preparation, J.F.; writing—review and editing, D.H., A.K., K.R.M. and S.M., visualization, J.F.; supervision, A.K., H.A.S., D.H., P.K.M. and S.M.; project administration, D.H.; funding acquisition, D.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) through the Collaborative Research Center, TRR 102, Polymers under multiple constraints: restricted and controlled molecular order and mobility (Project number 189853844–TRR 102, A06).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All raw data of this publication is available from the authors upon request: [email protected].

Acknowledgments

J. Fritzsch thanks the Medical Faculty of the University of Leipzig for a research fellowship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chiti, F.; Dobson, C.M. Protein misfolding, functional amyloid, and human disease. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2006, 75, 333–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Knopman, D.S.; Jones, D.T.; Greicius, M.D. Failure to demonstrate efficacy of aducanumab: An analysis of the EMERGE and ENGAGE trials as reported by Biogen, December 2019. Alzheimers Dement. 2021, 17, 696–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nguyen, P.H.; Ramamoorthy, A.; Sahoo, B.R.; Zheng, J.; Faller, P.; Straub, J.E.; Dominguez, L.; Shea, J.E.; Dokholyan, N.V.; De Simone, A.; et al. Amyloid Oligomers: A Joint Experimental/Computational Perspective on Alzheimer’s Disease, Parkinson’s Disease, Type II Diabetes, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 2545–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cawood, E.E.; Karamanos, T.K.; Wilson, A.J.; Radford, S.E. Visualizing and trapping transient oligomers in amyloid assembly pathways. Biophys. Chem. 2021, 268, 106505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sharma, S.; Modi, P.; Sharma, G.; Deep, S. Kinetics theories to understand the mechanism of aggregation of a protein and to design strategies for its inhibition. Biophys. Chem. 2021, 278, 106665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vignaud, H.; Bobo, C.; Lascu, I.; Sorgjerd, K.M.; Zako, T.; Maeda, M.; Salin, B.; Lecomte, S.; Cullin, C. A structure-toxicity study of Abeta42 reveals a new anti-parallel aggregation pathway. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Mao, Y.; Zlatic, C.O.; Griffin, M.D.; Howlett, G.J.; Todorova, N.; Yarovsky, I.; Gooley, P.R. Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange and Molecular Dynamics Analysis of Amyloid Fibrils Formed by a D69K Charge-Pair Mutant of Human Apolipoprotein C-II. Biochemistry 2015, 54, 4805–4814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mao, Y.; Teoh, C.L.; Yang, S.; Zlatic, C.O.; Rosenes, Z.K.; Gooley, P.R.; Howlett, G.J.; Griffin, M.D. Charge and charge-pair mutations alter the rate of assembly and structural properties of apolipoprotein C-II amyloid fibrils. Biochemistry 2015, 54, 1421–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Williams, A.D.; Shivaprasad, S.; Wetzel, R. Alanine scanning mutagenesis of Abeta(1-40) amyloid fibril stability. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 357, 1283–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wetzel, R.; Shivaprasad, S.; Williams, A.D. Plasticity of amyloid fibrils. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Adler, J.; Scheidt, H.A.; Kruger, M.; Thomas, L.; Huster, D. Local interactions influence the fibrillation kinetics, structure and dynamics of Abeta(1-40) but leave the general fibril structure unchanged. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 7461–7471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Adler, J.; Baumann, M.; Voigt, B.; Scheidt, H.A.; Bhowmik, D.; Haupl, T.; Abel, B.; Madhu, P.K.; Balbach, J.; Maiti, S.; et al. A Detailed Analysis of the Morphology of Fibrils of Selectively Mutated Amyloid beta (1-40). Chem. Phys. Chem. 2016, 17, 2744–2753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Das, A.K.; Rawat, A.; Bhowmik, D.; Pandit, R.; Huster, D.; Maiti, S. An Early Folding Contact between Phe19 and Leu34 is Critical for Amyloid-beta Oligomer Toxicity. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2015, 6, 1290–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hoffmann, F.; Adler, J.; Chandra, B.; Mote, K.R.; Bekcioglu-Neff, G.; Sebastiani, D.; Huster, D. Perturbation of the F19-L34 Contact in Amyloid beta (1-40) Fibrils Induces Only Local Structural Changes but Abolishes Cytotoxicity. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 4740–4745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Korn, A.; McLennan, S.; Adler, J.; Krueger, M.; Surendran, D.; Maiti, S.; Huster, D. Amyloid beta (1-40) Toxicity Depends on the Molecular Contact between Phenylalanine 19 and Leucine 34. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2018, 9, 790–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Korn, A.; Surendran, D.; Krueger, M.; Maiti, S.; Huster, D. Ring structure modifications of phenylalanine 19 increase fibrillation kinetics and reduce toxicity of amyloid beta (1–40). Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 5430–5433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Korn, A.; Hofling, C.; Zeitschel, U.; Krueger, M.; Rossner, S.; Huster, D. Incorporation of the Nonproteinogenic Amino Acid beta-Methylamino-alanine Affects Amyloid beta Fibril Properties and Toxicity. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020, 11, 1038–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vivekanandan, S.; Brender, J.R.; Lee, S.Y.; Ramamoorthy, A. A partially folded structure of amyloid-beta(1–40) in an aqueous environment. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 411, 312–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bertini, I.; Gonnelli, L.; Luchinat, C.; Mao, J.; Nesi, A. A new structural model of Abeta40 fibrils. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 16013–16022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Paravastu, A.K.; Qahwash, I.; Leapman, R.D.; Meredith, S.C.; Tycko, R. Seeded growth of beta-amyloid fibrils from Alzheimer’s brain-derived fibrils produces a distinct fibril structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 7443–7448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Lu, J.X.; Qiang, W.; Yau, W.M.; Schwieters, C.D.; Meredith, S.C.; Tycko, R. Molecular Structure of beta-Amyloid Fibrils in Alzheimer’s Disease Brain Tissue. Cell 2013, 154, 1257–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Ghosh, U.; Thurber, K.R.; Yau, W.M.; Tycko, R. Molecular structure of a prevalent amyloid-beta fibril polymorph from Alzheimer’s disease brain tissue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2023089118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sarkar, B.; Mithu, V.S.; Chandra, B.; Mandal, A.; Chandrakesan, M.; Bhowmik, D.; Madhu, P.K.; Maiti, S. Significant structural differences between transient amyloid-beta oligomers and less-toxic fibrils in regions known to harbor familial Alzheimer’s mutations. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 6888–6892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Vassar, P.S.; Culling, C.F. Fluorescent stains, with special reference to amyloid and connective tissues. Arch. Pathol. 1959, 68, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Nielsen, L.; Khurana, R.; Coats, A.; Frokjaer, S.; Brange, J.; Vyas, S.; Uversky, V.N.; Fink, A.L. Effect of environmental factors on the kinetics of insulin fibril formation: Elucidation of the molecular mechanism. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 6036–6046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gopinath, T.; Veglia, G. Dual acquisition magic-angle spinning solid-state NMR-spectroscopy: Simultaneous acquisition of multidimensional spectra of biomacromolecules. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 2731–2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Munowitz, M.G.; Griffin, R.G.; Bodenhausen, G.; Huang, T.H. Two-dimensional rotational spin-echo nuclear magnetic resonance in solids: Correlation of chemical shift and dipolar interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 2529–2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bielecki, A.; Kolbert, A.C.; Levitt, M.H. Frequency-switched pulse sequences: Homonuclear decoupling and dilute spin NMR in solids. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989, 155, 341–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Barré, P.; Zschörnig, O.; Arnold, K.; Huster, D. Structural and dynamical changes of the bindin B18 peptide upon binding to lipid membranes. A solid-state NMR study. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 8377–8386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jaroniec, C.P.; Tounge, B.A.; Herzfeld, J.; Griffin, R.G. Frequency selective heteronuclear dipolar recoupling in rotating solids: Accurate (13)C-(15)N distance measurements in uniformly (13)C,(15)N-labeled peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3507–3519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fatafta, H.; Khaled, M.; Owen, M.C.; Sayyed-Ahmad, A.; Strodel, B. Amyloid-beta peptide dimers undergo a random coil to beta-sheet transition in the aqueous phase but not at the neuronal membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2106210118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Spera, S.; Bax, A. Empirical correlation between protein backbone conformation and Ca and Cb 13C nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shifts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 5490–5492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Luca, S.; Filippov, D.V.; van Boom, J.H.; Oschkinat, H.; de Groot, H.J.; Baldus, M. Secondary chemical shifts in immobilized peptides and proteins: A qualitative basis for structure refinement under magic angle spinning. J. Biomol. NMR 2001, 20, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hong, M.; Yao, X.; Jakes, K.S.; Huster, D. Investigation of molecular motions by magic-angle cross-polarization NMR spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 7355–7364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Scheidt, H.A.; Morgado, I.; Rothemund, S.; Huster, D. Dynamics of amyloid beta fibrils revealed by solid-state NMR. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 2017–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Reddy, G.; Straub, J.E.; Thirumalai, D. Influence of preformed Asp23-Lys28 salt bridge on the conformational fluctuations of monomers and dimers of Abeta peptides with implications for rates of fibril formation. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 1162–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Brender, J.R.; Ghosh, A.; Kotler, S.A.; Krishnamoorthy, J.; Bera, S.; Morris, V.; Sil, T.B.; Garai, K.; Reif, B.; Bhunia, A.; et al. Probing transient non-native states in amyloid beta fiber elongation by NMR. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 4483–4486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tycko, R. Physical and structural basis for polymorphism in amyloid fibrils. Protein Sci. 2014, 23, 1528–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Tycko, R. Molecular structure of amyloid fibrils: Insights from solid-state NMR. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2006, 39, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Das, B.B.; Park, S.H.; Opella, S.J. Membrane protein structure from rotational diffusion. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1848, 229–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Fatafta, H.; Batuhan, K.; Bundschuh, B.F.; Loschwitz, J.; Strodel, B. Disorder-to-order transition of the amyloid-β peptide upon lipid binding. Biophys. Chem. 2021, 280, 106700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gilmanshin, R.; Dyer, R.B.; Callender, R.H. Structural heterogeneity of the various forms of apomyoglobin: Implications for protein folding. Protein Sci. 1997, 6, 2134–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Arai, M.; Kuwajima, K. Rapid formation of a molten globule intermediate in refolding of alpha-lactalbumin. Fold. Des. 1996, 1, 275–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Paravastu, A.K.; Leapman, R.D.; Yau, W.M.; Tycko, R. Molecular structural basis for polymorphism in Alzheimer’s beta-amyloid fibrils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 18349–18354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Petkova, A.T.; Yau, W.M.; Tycko, R. Experimental constraints on quaternary structure in Alzheimer’s beta-amyloid fibrils. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 498–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Barnes, C.A.; Robertson, A.J.; Louis, J.M.; Anfinrud, P.; Bax, A. Observation of beta-Amyloid Peptide Oligomerization by Pressure-Jump NMR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 13762–13766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Scheidt, H.A.; Morgado, I.; Rothemund, S.; Huster, D.; Fandrich, M. Solid-State NMR Spectroscopic Investigation of Abeta Protofibrils: Implication of a beta-Sheet Remodeling upon Maturation into Terminal Amyloid Fibrils. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2837–2840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lin, Y.; Sahoo, B.R.; Ozawa, D.; Kinoshita, M.; Kang, J.; Lim, M.H.; Okumura, M.; Huh, Y.H.; Moon, E.; Jang, J.H.; et al. Diverse Structural Conversion and Aggregation Pathways of Alzheimer’s Amyloid-beta (1-40). ACS Nano 2019, 13, 8766–8783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chandra, B.; Bhowmik, D.; Maity, B.K.; Mote, K.R.; Dhara, D.; Venkatramani, R.; Maiti, S.; Madhu, P.K. Major reaction coordinates linking transient amyloid-beta oligomers to fibrils measured at atomic level. Biophys. J. 2017, 113, 805–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Arndt, J.W.; Qian, F.; Smith, B.A.; Quan, C.; Kilambi, K.P.; Bush, M.W.; Walz, T.; Pepinsky, R.B.; Bussiere, T.; Hamann, S.; et al. Structural and kinetic basis for the selectivity of aducanumab for aggregated forms of amyloid-beta. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Chandra, B.; Haider, S.; Adler, J.; Korn, A.; Huster, D.; Maiti, S. Emerging structural details of transient amyloid-beta oligomers suggest designs for effective small molecule modulators. Chem, Phys. Lett. 2017, 675, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Han, J.; Du, Z.; Lim, M.H. Mechanistic Insight into the design of chemical tools to control multiple pathogenic features in Alzheimer’s disease. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021, 54, 3930–3940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gazit, E. A possible role for pi-stacking in the self-assembly of amyloid fibrils. FASEB J. 2002, 16, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nag, S.; Sarkar, B.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Sahoo, B.; Sreenivasan, V.K.; Kombrabail, M.; Muralidharan, C.; Maiti, S. Nature of the amyloid-beta monomer and the monomer-oligomer equilibrium. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 13827–13833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Fibrillation kinetics of Aβ40 WT and the respective mutants recorded by the standard Thioflavin T (ThT) fluorescence assay. Solid lines represent best fit simulations according to equation. (1). The shaded areas represent the standard error of the mean. Intensity data measurements were carried out in three independent experiments in quintuplicate for each peptide. Experimental errors in the determination of the lag time and fibrillation time were calculated from fitting errors.
Figure 1. Fibrillation kinetics of Aβ40 WT and the respective mutants recorded by the standard Thioflavin T (ThT) fluorescence assay. Solid lines represent best fit simulations according to equation. (1). The shaded areas represent the standard error of the mean. Intensity data measurements were carried out in three independent experiments in quintuplicate for each peptide. Experimental errors in the determination of the lag time and fibrillation time were calculated from fitting errors.
Biomolecules 11 01848 g001
Figure 2. Transmission electron micrographs (AE) and X-ray diffraction patterns (FJ) of fibrils of the Aβ40 variants. The scale bar represents 400 nm.
Figure 2. Transmission electron micrographs (AE) and X-ray diffraction patterns (FJ) of fibrils of the Aβ40 variants. The scale bar represents 400 nm.
Biomolecules 11 01848 g002
Figure 3. UV circular dichroism spectra of WT Aβ40 and mutant Aβ40 peptides before (A) and after incubation (B).
Figure 3. UV circular dichroism spectra of WT Aβ40 and mutant Aβ40 peptides before (A) and after incubation (B).
Biomolecules 11 01848 g003
Figure 4. 13C NMR Cα–Cβ chemical shift differences of the Aβ40 fibril variants (symbols) and reference values for α-helix, random coil and β-sheet structure (gray bars) for the labeled amino acids Val18, Phe19 and Ala21. 13Cα–13Cβ chemical shift differences represent a measure of the local secondary structure, which is independent of external chemical shift referencing.
Figure 4. 13C NMR Cα–Cβ chemical shift differences of the Aβ40 fibril variants (symbols) and reference values for α-helix, random coil and β-sheet structure (gray bars) for the labeled amino acids Val18, Phe19 and Ala21. 13Cα–13Cβ chemical shift differences represent a measure of the local secondary structure, which is independent of external chemical shift referencing.
Biomolecules 11 01848 g004
Figure 5. DIPSHIFT derived 13C–1H order parameters for the labeled 13C atoms of Val18, Phe19 and Ala21 in amyloid fibrils of the Aβ40 peptide variants as representation of the segmental molecular dynamics. (A) backbone sites, (B) side chains. Error bars were estimated as ±10% of the order parameter value. The order parameters for the Val18 Cβ and Ala21 Cβ could not be resolved.
Figure 5. DIPSHIFT derived 13C–1H order parameters for the labeled 13C atoms of Val18, Phe19 and Ala21 in amyloid fibrils of the Aβ40 peptide variants as representation of the segmental molecular dynamics. (A) backbone sites, (B) side chains. Error bars were estimated as ±10% of the order parameter value. The order parameters for the Val18 Cβ and Ala21 Cβ could not be resolved.
Biomolecules 11 01848 g005
Figure 6. Relative cell viability of RN46A cells incubated with peptide variants or the vehicle for the control group, respectively. The concentration of Aβ (1–40) WT or the mutant species was 100 µM, cells were incubated for 60 h at 37 °C. The cell viability of the control group was set to 100%. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean, * represents p < 0.005.
Figure 6. Relative cell viability of RN46A cells incubated with peptide variants or the vehicle for the control group, respectively. The concentration of Aβ (1–40) WT or the mutant species was 100 µM, cells were incubated for 60 h at 37 °C. The cell viability of the control group was set to 100%. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean, * represents p < 0.005.
Biomolecules 11 01848 g006
Figure 7. Summary of the specific tertiary contact analyses on Gly33Ala oligomers and fibrils. (A) Segment of the 13C-13C DARR correlation spectra (500 ms mixing time) of oligomers (blue) and fibrils (violet). The cross peaks indicate a molecular contact between Phe19 and Leu34 in oligomeric and fibrillary state. Rows extracted from the 2D contour maps (at 23.1 ppm for fibrils in violet and at 24.5 ppm for the oligomers in blue) are plotted on the bottom of the graph. (B) REDOR dephasing curve of the Gly33Ala fibrils (violet) and oligomers (blue). The Asp23-13COO-Lys28-15NH3+ distance in the side chains of fibrils could be determined to 4.1 Å, indicating the formation of a stable salt bridge. In oligomers, no REDOR dephasing was observed between the side chains of Asp23 and Lys28 indicating the absence of the salt bridge.
Figure 7. Summary of the specific tertiary contact analyses on Gly33Ala oligomers and fibrils. (A) Segment of the 13C-13C DARR correlation spectra (500 ms mixing time) of oligomers (blue) and fibrils (violet). The cross peaks indicate a molecular contact between Phe19 and Leu34 in oligomeric and fibrillary state. Rows extracted from the 2D contour maps (at 23.1 ppm for fibrils in violet and at 24.5 ppm for the oligomers in blue) are plotted on the bottom of the graph. (B) REDOR dephasing curve of the Gly33Ala fibrils (violet) and oligomers (blue). The Asp23-13COO-Lys28-15NH3+ distance in the side chains of fibrils could be determined to 4.1 Å, indicating the formation of a stable salt bridge. In oligomers, no REDOR dephasing was observed between the side chains of Asp23 and Lys28 indicating the absence of the salt bridge.
Biomolecules 11 01848 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fritzsch, J.; Korn, A.; Surendran, D.; Krueger, M.; Scheidt, H.A.; Mote, K.R.; Madhu, P.K.; Maiti, S.; Huster, D. Probing the Influence of Single-Site Mutations in the Central Cross-β Region of Amyloid β (1–40) Peptides. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1848. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11121848

AMA Style

Fritzsch J, Korn A, Surendran D, Krueger M, Scheidt HA, Mote KR, Madhu PK, Maiti S, Huster D. Probing the Influence of Single-Site Mutations in the Central Cross-β Region of Amyloid β (1–40) Peptides. Biomolecules. 2021; 11(12):1848. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11121848

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fritzsch, Jacob, Alexander Korn, Dayana Surendran, Martin Krueger, Holger A. Scheidt, Kaustubh R. Mote, Perunthiruthy K. Madhu, Sudipta Maiti, and Daniel Huster. 2021. "Probing the Influence of Single-Site Mutations in the Central Cross-β Region of Amyloid β (1–40) Peptides" Biomolecules 11, no. 12: 1848. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11121848

APA Style

Fritzsch, J., Korn, A., Surendran, D., Krueger, M., Scheidt, H. A., Mote, K. R., Madhu, P. K., Maiti, S., & Huster, D. (2021). Probing the Influence of Single-Site Mutations in the Central Cross-β Region of Amyloid β (1–40) Peptides. Biomolecules, 11(12), 1848. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11121848

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop