Next Article in Journal
Highly Conserved C-Terminal Region of Indian Hedgehog N-Fragment Contributes to Its Auto-Processing and Multimer Formation
Next Article in Special Issue
Pitfalls of NMDA Receptor Modulation by Neuroactive Steroids. The Effect of Positive and Negative Modulation of NMDA Receptors in an Animal Model of Schizophrenia
Previous Article in Journal
Mediterranean Diet and Neurodegenerative Diseases: The Neglected Role of Nutrition in the Modulation of the Endocannabinoid System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analytical Methods for the Determination of Neuroactive Steroids
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Epipregnanolone as a Positive Modulator of GABAA Receptor in Rat Cerebellar and Hippocampus Neurons

1
Functional Synaptology Laboratory, Brain Research Department, Research Center of Neurology, Volokolamskoe Shosse 80, 125367 Moscow, Russia
2
Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Flemingovo Namesti 2, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2021, 11(6), 791; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11060791
Submission received: 30 April 2021 / Revised: 17 May 2021 / Accepted: 20 May 2021 / Published: 24 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurosteroids in Health and Disease)

Abstract

:
Epipregnanolone (3β-hydroxy-5β-pregnan-20-one, Epi) is an endogenous steroid with important physiological effects and high affinity for GABAA receptors. The effect of Epi on GABA-induced chloride current (IGABA) in native neurons has hardly been studied. In this work, we studied the influence of Epi on the IGABA in the Purkinje cells of rat cerebellum and pyramidal neurons of rat hippocampus with the patch clamp technique. We showed that Epi is a positive modulator of the IGABA with EC50 of 5.7 µM in Purkinje cells and 9.3 µM in hippocampal neurons. Epi-induced potentiation of the IGABA was more potent at low vs. high GABA concentrations. Isopregnanolone (3β-hydroxy-5α-pregnan-20-one, Iso) counteracted Epi, reducing its potentiating effect by 2–2.3 times. Flumazenil, a nonsteroidal GABAA receptor antagonist, does not affect the Epi-induced potentiation. Comparison of the potentiating effects of Epi and allopregnanolone (3α-hydroxy-5α-pregnan-20-one, ALLO) showed that ALLO is, at least, a four times more potent positive modulator than Epi. The combined application of ALLO and Epi showed that the effects of these two steroids are not additive. We conclude that Epi has a dual effect on the IGABA increasing the current in the control solution and decreasing the stimulatory effect of ALLO.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Steroids with pregnane skeleton were shown to be effective modulators of neuronal gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABAA) receptors [1,2]. The spatial arrangement of the hydroxyl group at C3 position of steroid skeleton (Figure 1) dramatically affects the biological properties of the steroids [3]. It has been shown that 3α-hydroxypregnanes (for example, allopregnanolone, ALLO,) potentiate the GABA-induced chloride current (IGABA) in nanomolar concentrations, while the 3β-hydroxy-pregnanes, i.e., epipregnanolone (Epi) and isopregnanolone (Iso) exhibit antagonistic properties and reduce the stimulating effect of 3α-hydroxypregnanes on IGABA [4]. However, note that the literature describing the effect of 3β-hydroxypregnanes on IGABA is controversial. The majority of studied 3β-hydroxy compounds were described to be effectively inert [5,6,7]. In contrast, some 3beta-hydroxy compounds, including Epi, have been found to induce mild positive modulatory effects. For example, Wang et al. [4] have found that IGABA recorded from recombinant GABAA receptors expressed in frog oocytes is potentiated by 30% in the presence of 10 µM Epi. Kokate et al. [8] showed that IGABA in cultured hippocampal neurons was enhanced by 45% in the presence of 1 µM Epi. Strömberg et al. [9] investigated the effects of the Epi and its interaction with ALLO by recording spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) in rat hypothalamic neurons. Both ALLO (100 nM) and Epi (3 µM) produced a marked prolongation of sIPSCs decay. Co-application of ALLO and Epi induced a 20–25% reduction of decay. The authors concluded that Epi can act both as a positive and negative GABAA-receptor modulator. However, this conclusion is not confirmed by other authors, who did not find signs of positive modulation of the IGABA by Epi on the cells of the dorsal ganglia [10], recombinant GABAA receptors [7], and pituitary melanotrope cells [6]. The ability of Epi to positively modulate IGABA in native neurons has hardly been studied. The aim of this work was to study the effect of Epi on the IGABA on neurons isolated from rat cerebellum and hippocampus.
Epi is the stereoisomer of ALLO, as it differs by its orientation of C-3 hydroxy group as compared to ALLO. ALLO has been implicated in a range of neurological and psychiatric diseases [11]. Epi, on the other hand, and for whatever reason, does not attract scientists to conduct further research. Nonetheless, the published studies clearly show a great therapeutic potential of Epi that could reach beyond modulation of GABAA receptors. For example, O’Dell et al. [12] showed significant reduction of alcohol self-administration following pre-treatment with Epi. The authors proposed that this effect could be related to Epi’s actions on either GABAA or N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. Other authors [10,13] described analgesic properties of Epi. In the opinion of these authors, Epi does not significantly affect GABAA receptors and the analgesic properties of this steroid are explained by its inhibitory effect on voltage-dependent Cav3.2 T-type calcium channels. We believe that our extensive study on Epi´s modulation of GABAA receptors will offer a novel perspective of the mechanisms of its physiological effects.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Preparation

All procedures were performed in accordance with the institutional guidelines on the care and use of experimental animals set by the Russian Academy of Sciences. The cells were isolated from transverse cerebellar or hippocampal slices as described in detail elsewhere [14]. Briefly, the slices (200–500 µm) of the Wistar rat (11–14 days of age) hippocampus or cerebellum were incubated at room temperature for at least 2 h in a solution containing the following components (in mM): 124 NaCl, 3 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgSO4, 25 NaHCO3, 1.3 NaH2PO4, 10 d-glucose, pH 7.4. The saline was continuously stirred and bubbled with carbogen (95% O2 + 5% CO2). Single pyramidal neurons from CA3 of hippocampus or Purkinje cells from cerebellum were isolated by a vibrating fused glass pipette with a spherical tip. In each experiment we used two animals. We obtained 3–4 slices from an animal and one cell from one slice. Data points represent an average from 6 to 7 cells.

2.2. Current Recordings

GABA-activated currents (IGABA) in isolated neurons were induced by a step application of agonist for 1–2 s with 40 s intervals through a glass capillary, 0.1 mm in diameter, which could be rapidly displaced laterally. Transmembrane currents were recorded using a conventional patch clamp technique in the whole-cell configuration. Patch clamp electrodes had a tip resistance of ~2 MΩ. The solution in the recording pipette contained the following (in mM): 40 CsF, 100 CsCl, 0.5 CaCl2, 5 EGTA, 3 MgCl2, 4 NaATP, 5 HEPES, 4 ATP, pH 7.3. The composition of extracellular solution was as follows (in mM): 140 NaCl, 3 KCl, 3 CaCl2, 3 MgCl2, 10 d-glucose, 10 HEPES hemisodium, pH 7.4. The speed of perfusion was 0.6 mL/min. The currents were recorded using an EPC7 patch clamp amplifier (HEKA Electronik, Reutlingen, Germany). The holding potential was maintained at −70 mV. Transmembrane currents were filtered at 3 kHz, stored and analyzed with an IBM–PC computer (Avelon, Moscow, Russia), using homemade software.

2.3. Reagents

All reagents used for intracellular and extracellular solutions as well as flumazenil were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Steroids were purchased from the following vendors: epipregnanolone (Carbosynth Ltd., Compton, Berkshire, UK, CAS 128-21-2, catalogue number FE177267), allopregnanolone (Carbosynth Ltd., Compton, Berkshire, UK, CAS 516-54-1, catalogue number FA158661), isopregnanolone (Steraloids, Newport, RI, USA, CAS 516-55-2, catalogue number P3830-000).

2.4. Data Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed by Prism GraphPad software (San Diego, CA, USA). All comparisons were made with unpaired (Section 3.1, Section 3.2, Section 3.3 and Section 3.5) or paired (Section 3.4) Student’s t-test at a significance level of p = 0.05. In the result descriptions, the mean and standard error of the mean (SEM) are specified. The EC50 value for steroid potentiation of the IGABA was determined using the equation: Y = Bottom + (Emax − Bottom)/[1 + (EC50/C)n], where Bottom and Emax are current amplitudes measured in a control solution and in the presence of a steroid, respectively, C is the concentration of steroid, EC50 is the half-maximal stimulating concentration, and n is the slope factor (Hill coefficient).

3. Results

3.1. Epipregnanolone Potentiates the IGABA in Purkinje Cells from Cerebellum

The brief application of GABA for 1–2 s on isolated Purkinje cells evoked a chloride current (IGABA) with an amplitude dependent on GABA concentration with an EC50 value of 6.8 ± 1.0 µM. The specific antagonist of GABAA receptors bicuculline (3 µM) reversibly blocked the current. The average value of the reversal potential of IGABA −9.7 ± 0.8 mV closely matched the chloride reversal potential calculated for the chloride concentrations used (−9.5 mV). Co-application of 2 µM GABA (EC5) with a different concentration of Epi caused the potentiation of the IGABA (Figure 2). The potentiating effect of Epi developed slowly, particularly at low concentrations. The peak amplitude plotted in panels B was the highest point in the 2 s application.
The effect was reversible upon washout during 1–2 min. The threshold concentration of Epi was 1 µM, at which the peak amplitude of the current increased to 142 ± 8% of the control (p < 0.001, n = 7). A representative effect of Epi on IGABA on one cell is shown in Figure 2A. An increase in the steroid concentration up to 100 µM caused a dose-dependent increase in the potentiation effect. The maximum effect (Emax) was observed at 100 µM Epi and amounted to 372 ± 30% of the control, while the EC50 and Hill coefficient were 5.7 ± 1.9 µM and 0.98 ± 0.36, respectively. Figure 2B shows the concentration dependence of the Epi effect on the normalized IGABA peak amplitude.

3.2. Isopregnanolone Antagonizes the Potentiating Effect of Epipregnanolone

Steroid Iso is a diastereoisomer of ALLO and was described to antagonize the potentiating effect of ALLO on the recombinant GABA receptors [4]. We studied whether Iso antagonizes the potentiating effect of Epi on the IGABA in Purkinje cells. Co-application of 2 µM GABA with Iso at concentrations from 0.1 µM to 50 µM did not affect the IGABA. The only effective concentration of Iso was 100 µM at which the peak amplitude of the current reversibly decreased to 84 ± 4% of control (p < 0.05, n = 6). The representative traces of Iso effect on IGABA on one cell is shown in Figure 2A. Figure 2B shows the concentration dependence of the Iso effect on the normalized IGABA peak amplitude. Then we studied the effect of co-application of Epi and Iso. Low Iso concentrations (1–10 µM) did not change the Epi effect while higher Iso concentrations (50 and 100 µM) significantly (p < 0.001) weakened the effect of Epi. In particular, 50 µM Epi increased the IGABA amplitude to 330 ± 17% of the control without Iso, to 167 ± 11% in the presence of 50 µM Iso, and to 141 ± 5% in the presence of 100 µM Iso. The representative traces of effect of Epi (50 µM) in the presence of Iso (100 µM) on IGABA of one cell are shown in Figure 2A. Figure 2C shows the average normalized values of the peak amplitude of IGABA in the presence of 50 µM Epi alone and in the presence of 100 µM Iso. The supposed mechanism of the weakening of the potentiating effect of Epi in the presence of Iso is a competitive inhibition for Epi ± Iso. In order to understand whether the benzodiazepine site of the GABA receptor is involved in the observed interaction of Epi and Iso, we used flumazenil, a known antagonist of the benzodiazepine site [15]. Our experiments demonstrated that 10 µM flumazenil does not affect the Epi-induced potentiation (Figure 2C).

3.3. The Effects of Epipregnanolone and Allopregnanolone on the IGABA Are Not Additive

ALLO is known to be a strong positive modulator of IGABA in different cells [4,9,11]. In this work, we have shown for the first time that ALLO induces a strong potentiation of the IGABA in the Purkinje cells of cerebellum (Figure 3). The representative traces of effect of 0.5 µM ALLO on IGABA of one cell are shown in Figure 3A. Figure 3B shows the concentration dependence of the ALLO effect on the normalized IGABA peak amplitude leading to a bell-shaped concentration–response. In particular, ALLO gradually enhanced IGABA in the concentration range from 10 to 5000 nM, but at higher concentrations (10–100 µM) the steroid began to reduce the current. The Emax (646 ± 37%), EC50 (0.29 ± 0.06 µM), and Hill coefficient (1.5 ± 0.3) values were determined from the fit to the rising phase of the curve. Comparison of the effects of ALLO and Epi, taken at a concentration of 5 µM, shows that ALLO is at least 4 times more effective as a positive modulator of IGABA on Purkinje cells. In the presence of 5 µM ALLO, the amplitude of the IGABA increased by 535 ± 47% and in the presence of 5 µM Epi the amplitude of the IGABA increased by 122 ± 15% (p < 0.001, n = 7). In the presence of Iso (50 or 100 µM), the effect of ALLO significantly decreased. According to the literature, Epi is able to suppress the effect of ALLO on the IGABA [4,9]. We studied IGABA on Purkinje cells with co-application of Epi and ALLO at an ALLO concentration of 0.5 µM and various Epi concentrations (1, 10, and 50 µM). We found that, in these experiments, the summation of the ALLO and Epi effects is violated. The absence of additivity of effects is especially clearly seen at high concentrations of Epi (50 µM) (Figure 3). A representative effect of 50 µM Epi in the presence of 0.5 µM ALLO on IGABA of one cell is shown in Figure 3A. Figure 3C shows the average normalized values of the peak amplitude of IGABA in the presence of 0.5 µM ALLO (482 ± 32% of control), 50 µM Epi (333 ± 17% of control), ALLO and Epi together (422 ± 23% of control), 100 µM Iso (84 ± 4% of control), and ALLO together with Iso (288 ± 27% of control).

3.4. Epipregnanolone-Induced Potentiation of the IGABA Is More Efficacious at Low vs. High GABA Concentrations

The influence of agonist concentration on the extent of Epi-induced potentiation was determined by measuring the potentiation by 10 µM Epi of currents evoked by increasing GABA concentration from 2 to 100 µM (Figure 4). The potentiation was GABA concentration-dependent, being larger at lower concentrations of GABA. Statistical analysis was performed using the paired Student’s t-test. The current induced by 2 µM GABA, was enhanced by Epi to 253 ± 26% of control (p < 0.05, n = 6) and current induced by 5 µM GABA was enhanced to 165 ± 19% of control (p < 0.05, n = 6). The potentiating effect was not observed at higher GABA concentrations (10, 20 and 100 M). The comparison of concentration–response curve for GABA in control and during co-application with 10 µM Epi shows that the steroid did not change the maximal GABA current but shifted dose–response curve to the left. The EC50 value was changed from 6.8 ± 1.0 µM in control condition to 4.1 ± 1.4 µM in the presence of 10 µM Epi (p < 0.001, n = 6). The difference in the values of the Hill coefficient is not statistically significant: 1.9 ± 0.5 in control and 1.45 ± 0.4 in the presence of 10 µM Epi.

3.5. Epipregnanolone Potentiates the IGABA in Pyramidal Neurons from Hippocampus

Strömberg et al. [9] found that the effects of Epi on GABA-induced Cl uptake were different in the rat cerebellum and hippocampus. However, in our experiments, no significant difference was found in the effects of Epi on IGABA in neurons of the rat cerebellum and hippocampus. Isolated pyramidal neurons from CA3 area of hippocampus with high sensitivity to GABA were chosen for the experiments. The brief application of GABA for 1 s evoked the IGABA in these neurons, whose amplitude was dependent on GABA concentration, with an EC50 value of 8.1 ± 2.8 µM. Co-application of 2 µM GABA with different concentration of Epi caused the potentiation of the IGABA (Figure 5). The effect was reversible upon washout during 1–2 min. The threshold concentration of Epi was 5 μM, at which the peak amplitude of the current increased to 156 ± 11% of control (p < 0.01, n = 6). An increase in the steroid concentration up to 100 μM caused a dose-dependent increase in the potentiation effect. The maximum effect was observed at 100 µM Epi and amounted to 420 + 38% of the control, while the EC50 and Hill coefficient were 9.3 + 2.9 µM and 1.8 + 0.6, respectively.

4. Discussion

In the present work, we showed that Epi is a positive modulator of IGABA in the Purkinje cells of the rat cerebellum (Emax = 372% and EC50 = 5.7 µM) and pyramidal neurons of the rat hippocampus (Emax = 420% and EC50 = 9.3 µM). The potentiating effect of Epi developed slowly, particularly at low concentrations. Li et al. [16] studied the reasons for the slow development of IGABA potentiation in the presence of a steroid and concluded that the slow actions are not likely to result from slow kinetics of interaction with the GABAA receptor, but rather reflect the slow equilibrium of steroid in a membrane compartment that is in equilibrium with the receptor. We further showed that Epi caused an increase in the affinity of the GABAA receptors for the agonist in Purkinje cells. In the presence of Epi, the concentration dependence curve for GABA shifted to the left along the horizontal axis with a significant decrease in the EC50 value. Relative to ALLO, Epi was a significantly weaker positive modulator of IGABA. The EC50 value for ALLO was almost 20 times lower than for Epi (0.29 µM vs. 5.7 µM). The shape of the dose-response curves for Epi and ALLO was also different. In the concentration range 0.01–100 µM, this curve was smooth for Epi and bell-shaped for ALLO. At the same time, Iso weakened the potentiation caused by Epi and ALO in the same way while the benzodiazepine site antagonist flumazenil was inert.
Literature data on the ability of Epi to positively modulate the GABAA receptors is contradictory. Using [3H]flunitrazepam binding assay, it was found that Epi can act as a partial agonist on a common neurosteroid modulatory site at the GABAA receptor complex in avian central nervous system [17]. Electrophysiological experiments on recombinant GABAA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes showed that IGABA amplitude increased by 30% in the presence of 10 µM Epi [4]. The authors tested five 3β-hydroxysteroids and Epi was the only drug with the ability to potentiate the IGABA. Strömberg et al. [9] investigated the effects of Epi and ALLO by recordings spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) in rat hypothalamic neurons. Epi (3 µM) and ALLO (0.1 µM) was found to act in a similar way, i.e., without changing the peak amplitude of sIPSCs, they slowed down their decay, so the decay time constant (τdecay) increased significantly. However, other authors did not find positive modulation of the IGABA by Epi on the cells of the dorsal ganglia [10], recombinant GABAA receptors [7], and in pituitary melanotrope cells [6]. Therefore, our work confirms Epi’s ability to potentiate IGABA in native neurons.
It has been shown on different model systems that Epi suppress the potentiating effect of ALLO on the IGABA [4,9,18]. Both competitive [18] and non-competitive [4] mechanisms of interaction of these steroids are discussed. Wang et al. [4] studied interaction between Epi and ALLO in recombinant GABAA receptor and found that 10 µM Epi reduced effect of high (more than 3 µM) but not low concentrations of ALLO, which suggested noncompetitive mechanism. In our experiments, we observed the lack of additivity between Epi and ALLO at relatively low concentrations of ALLO (0.5 μM). It allows to suggest that the effects of steroids obtained on recombinant GABAA receptor and on native GABAA receptor in Purkinje cells may have different mechanisms and that our results, in our opinion, can be explained by the competition between Epi and ALLO for the same site. It is also important to note another difference between our data and the results of Wang et al. [4]. In our experiments, the concentration dependence of the ALLO effect on the IGABA was bell-shaped, while this curve was smooth on recombinant GABA receptors.
GABAA receptors are the major inhibitory receptors in the central nervous system, formed by combination of α1–6, β1–3, γ1–3, ρ1–3, ε, π, δ or θ subunits with the predominant receptor being α1β2γ2 with a subunit stoichiometry of 2:2:1 [19]. Despite the fact, that GABAA receptors are the primary molecular targets of neurosteroid action, the structural details of neurosteroid binding to these proteins remain poorly understood. Multiple functional neurosteroid binding sites are believed to exist on GABAA receptor [20]. Three neurosteroid-binding sites in the α1β3 GABAA receptor are identified to contribute to neurosteroid allosteric modulation [1,3]. Sugasawa et al. [1] found that potentiating neurosteroid ALLO, but not its inhibitory 3β-epimer Epi binds to the canonical β3(+)–α1(−) inter-subunit site that mediates receptor activation by neurosteroids. In contrast, both ALLO and Epi bind to intrasubunit sites in the β3 subunit, promoting receptor desensitization. Another intrasubunit site in the α1 subunit promotes effects that vary between neurosteroids. The authors believe that differential occupancy and efficacy at three discrete neurosteroid-binding sites determine whether a neurosteroid has potentiating, inhibitory, or competitive antagonist activity on GABAA receptors. It can be thought that the same neurosteroid is capable of interacting with at least two sites on GABAA receptor. The bell-shaped dependence of the ALLO effect on concentration observed in our experiments indicates that the drug interacts with two sites, potentiating and desensitizing. At the same time, smooth dependence of the Epi effect on concentration suggests its interaction with one potentiating site. We believe that ALLO and Epi interact with the same potentiating site. This assumption is confirmed in the work of Shin et al. [21]. The authors provide functional evidence that 5α- and 5β-reduced steroids interact with the same sites on the GABAA receptor. During co-application of two positive modulators acting at the same sites, the nature of GABAA receptors modulation depends on the efficacies and concentrations of each compound. In our experiments with co-application of ALLO and Epi, the concentration ratio was strongly in favor of Epi. It seems that the latter displaces ALLO from its binding sites and this affect the response amplitude.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.S. and J.B.; methodology, R.K.; software, R.K.; validation, J.B., E.S., and R.K.; formal analysis, J.B.; investigation, J.B.; resources, R.K.; data curation, E.S.; writing—original draft preparation, E.K.; writing—review and editing, E.K.; visualization, E.K.; supervision, E.S.; project administration, E.S.; funding acquisition, E.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by European Regional Development Fund–ERDF/ESF Project “PharmaBrain,” No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_025/0007444 and by the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (AS CR)—grant RVO 61388963.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All experiments were conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of Public Health of the Russian Federation and were consistent with EU directive for Use of Experimental Animals of the European Community. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Scientific Center of Neurology, protocol no. 2-5/19 of 02.20.19.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author [email protected] (E.S.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sugasawa, Y.; Cheng, W.W.; Bracamontes, J.R.; Chen, Z.-W.; Wang, L.; Germann, A.L.; Pierce, S.R.; Senneff, T.C.; Krishnan, K.; Reichert, D.E.; et al. Site-specific effects of neurosteroids on GABAA receptor activation and desensitization. eLife 2020, 9, e55331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bukanova, J.V.; Solntseva, E.I.; Kolbaev, S.N.; Kudova, E. Modulation of GABA and glycine receptors in rat pyramidal hippocampal neurones by 3α5β-pregnanolone derivatives. Neurochem. Int. 2018, 118, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Miller, P.S.; Scott, S.; Masiulis, S.; De Colibus, L.; Pardon, E.; Steyaert, J.; Aricescu, A.R. Structural basis for GABAA receptor potentiation by neurosteroids. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2017, 24, 986–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, M.; He, Y.; Eisenman, L.N.; Fields, C.; Zeng, C.-M.; Mathews, J.; Benz, A.; Fu, T.; Zorumski, E.; Covey, D.F.; et al. 3β-Hydroxypregnane steroids are pregnenolone sulfate-like GABA(A) receptor antagonists. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 3366–3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Poisbeau, P.; Feltz, P.; Schlicht, R. Modulation of GABAA receptor-mediated IPSCs by neuroactive steroids in a rat hypothalamo-hypophyseal coculture model. J. Physiol. 1997, 500 Pt 2, 475–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Le Foll, F.; Louiset, E.; Castel, H.; Vaudry, H.; Cazin, L. Electrophysiological effects of various neuroactive steroids on the GABA(A) receptor in pituitary melanotrope cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1997, 331, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Weir, C.J.; Ling, A.T.Y.; Belelli, D.; Wildsmith, J.A.W.; Peters, J.A. The interaction of anaesthetic steroids with recombinant glycine and GABAA receptors. Br. J. Anaesth. 2004, 92, 704–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Kokate, T.G.; Svensson, B.E.; Rogawski, M.A. Anticonvulsant activity of neurosteroids: Correlation with gamma-aminobutyric acid-evoked chloride current potentiation. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1994, 270, 1223–1229. [Google Scholar]
  9. Strömberg, J.; Haage, D.; Taube, M.; Bäckström, T.; Lundgren, P. Neurosteroid modulation of allopregnanolone and GABA effect on the GABA-A receptor. Neuroscience 2006, 143, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ayoola, C.; Hwang, S.M.; Hong, S.J.; Rose, K.E.; Boyd, C.; Bozic, N.; Park, J.-Y.; Osuru, H.P.; DiGruccio, M.R.; Covey, D.F.; et al. Inhibition of CaV3.2 T-type calcium channels in peripheral sensory neurons contributes to analgesic properties of epipregnanolone. Psychopharmacology 2014, 231, 3503–3515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Paul, S.M.; Pinna, G.; Guidotti, A. Allopregnanolone: From molecular pathophysiology to therapeutics. A historical perspective. Neurobiol. Stress 2020, 12, 100215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. O’Dell, L.E.; Purdy, R.H.; Covey, D.F.; Richardson, H.N.; Roberto, M.; Koob, G.F. Epipregnanolone and a novel synthetic neuroactive steroid reduce alcohol self-administration in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2005, 81, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Joksimovic, S.L.; Donald, R.R.; Park, J.-Y.; Todorovic, S.M. Inhibition of multiple voltage-gated calcium channels may contribute to spinally mediated analgesia by epipregnanolone in a rat model of surgical paw incision. Channels 2019, 13, 48–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Vorobjev, V.S. Vibrodissociation of sliced mammalian nervous tissue. J. Neurosci. Methods 1991, 8, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hood, S.D.; Norman, A.; Hince, D.A.; Melichar, J.K.; Hulse, G.K. Benzodiazepine dependence and its treatment with low dose flumazenil. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2014, 77, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Li, P.; Shu, H.-J.; Wang, C.; Mennerick, S.; Zorumski, C.F.; Covey, D.F.; Steinbach, J.H.; Akk, G. Neurosteroid migration to intracellular compartments reduces steroid concentration in the membrane and diminishes GABA-A receptor potentiation. J. Physiol. 2007, 584 Pt 3, 789–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pignataro, L.; de Plazas, S.F. Epipregnanolone acts as a partial agonist on a common neurosteroid modulatory site of the GABA(A) receptor complex in avian CNS. Neurochem. Res. 1997, 22, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Prince, R.J.; Simmonds, M.A. Differential antagonism by epipregnanolone of alphaxalone and pregnanolone potentiation of [3H]flunitrazepam binding suggests more than one class of binding site for steroids at GABAA receptors. Neuropharmacology 1993, 32, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sieghart, W. Structure, pharmacology, and function of GABAA receptor subtypes. Adv. Pharmacol. 2006, 54, 231–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Z.W.; Bracamontes, J.R.; Budelier, M.M.; Germann, A.L.; Shin, D.J.; Kathiresan, K.; Qian, M.X.; Manion, B.; Cheng, W.W.L.; Reichert, D.E.; et al. Multiple functional neurosteroid binding sites on GABAA receptors. PLoS Biol. 2019, 17, e3000157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Shin, D.J.; Germann, A.L.; Covey, D.F.; Steinbach, J.H.; Akk, G. Analysis of GABA A receptor activation by combinations of agonists acting at the same or distinct binding sites. Mol. Pharmacol. 2019, 95, 70–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Structures of epipregnanolone (Epi), allopregnanolone (ALLO), and isopregnanolone (Iso). When the rings of a steroid are denoted as projections onto the plane of the paper, the α-substituent (hashed bond) is located below the plane, and the β-substituent (bold bond) above the plane of the paper. The important ring numbering positions are highlighted in red for epipregnanolone.
Figure 1. Structures of epipregnanolone (Epi), allopregnanolone (ALLO), and isopregnanolone (Iso). When the rings of a steroid are denoted as projections onto the plane of the paper, the α-substituent (hashed bond) is located below the plane, and the β-substituent (bold bond) above the plane of the paper. The important ring numbering positions are highlighted in red for epipregnanolone.
Biomolecules 11 00791 g001
Figure 2. Iso antagonizes the potentiation of IGABA induced by Epi in Purkinje cells. (A) Representative traces of the current induced by 2 µM gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in control and during co-application with different concentrations of Epi (left), 100 µM Iso (middle) and 50 µM Epi together with 100 µM Iso (right). (B) Concentration dependence of Epi and Iso effect on the normalized peak amplitude of IGABA. (C) Mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of the normalized values of the peak amplitude of IGABA in the presence of Epi (50 µM), Iso (100 µM), Epi + Iso, flumazenil (10 µM), Epi + flumazenil. The control value is indicated by a dashed line. Data points represent average from seven cells. *** Means p < 0.001, ns means not significant.
Figure 2. Iso antagonizes the potentiation of IGABA induced by Epi in Purkinje cells. (A) Representative traces of the current induced by 2 µM gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in control and during co-application with different concentrations of Epi (left), 100 µM Iso (middle) and 50 µM Epi together with 100 µM Iso (right). (B) Concentration dependence of Epi and Iso effect on the normalized peak amplitude of IGABA. (C) Mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of the normalized values of the peak amplitude of IGABA in the presence of Epi (50 µM), Iso (100 µM), Epi + Iso, flumazenil (10 µM), Epi + flumazenil. The control value is indicated by a dashed line. Data points represent average from seven cells. *** Means p < 0.001, ns means not significant.
Biomolecules 11 00791 g002
Figure 3. The effects of Epi and ALLO are not additive. (A) Representative traces of the current induced by 2 µM GABA in control and during co-application with 0.5 µM ALLO, 50 µM Epi, ALLO + Epi, 100 µM Iso, and ALLO + Iso. (B) Concentration dependence of ALLO effect on the normalized peak amplitude of IGABA. (C) Mean ± SEM of the normalized values of the peak amplitude of IGABA in the presence of ALLO (0.5 µM), Epi (50 µM), ALLO + Epi, Iso (100 µM), Iso + ALLO. The control value is indicated by a dashed line. Data points represent average from seven cells. *** Means p < 0.001, ns means not significant.
Figure 3. The effects of Epi and ALLO are not additive. (A) Representative traces of the current induced by 2 µM GABA in control and during co-application with 0.5 µM ALLO, 50 µM Epi, ALLO + Epi, 100 µM Iso, and ALLO + Iso. (B) Concentration dependence of ALLO effect on the normalized peak amplitude of IGABA. (C) Mean ± SEM of the normalized values of the peak amplitude of IGABA in the presence of ALLO (0.5 µM), Epi (50 µM), ALLO + Epi, Iso (100 µM), Iso + ALLO. The control value is indicated by a dashed line. Data points represent average from seven cells. *** Means p < 0.001, ns means not significant.
Biomolecules 11 00791 g003
Figure 4. The degree of Epi effect depends on GABA concentration. (A,B) Representative traces of current induced by 2 µM GABA (A) and 20 µM GABA (B) in control and during co-application with 10 µM Epi. (C) Concentration–response curves for GABA obtained in control (squares) and in the presence of 10 µM Epi (triangles). Data points represent an average from six cells.
Figure 4. The degree of Epi effect depends on GABA concentration. (A,B) Representative traces of current induced by 2 µM GABA (A) and 20 µM GABA (B) in control and during co-application with 10 µM Epi. (C) Concentration–response curves for GABA obtained in control (squares) and in the presence of 10 µM Epi (triangles). Data points represent an average from six cells.
Biomolecules 11 00791 g004
Figure 5. Epi potentiates the IGABA in pyramidal neurons of rat hippocampus. (A) Representative traces of the current induced by 2 µM GABA in control and during co-application with different concentrations of Epi. (B) Concentration dependence of Epi effect on the normalized peak amplitude of IGABA. Data points represent average from six cells.
Figure 5. Epi potentiates the IGABA in pyramidal neurons of rat hippocampus. (A) Representative traces of the current induced by 2 µM GABA in control and during co-application with different concentrations of Epi. (B) Concentration dependence of Epi effect on the normalized peak amplitude of IGABA. Data points represent average from six cells.
Biomolecules 11 00791 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bukanova, J.; Solntseva, E.; Kondratenko, R.; Kudova, E. Epipregnanolone as a Positive Modulator of GABAA Receptor in Rat Cerebellar and Hippocampus Neurons. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 791. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11060791

AMA Style

Bukanova J, Solntseva E, Kondratenko R, Kudova E. Epipregnanolone as a Positive Modulator of GABAA Receptor in Rat Cerebellar and Hippocampus Neurons. Biomolecules. 2021; 11(6):791. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11060791

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bukanova, Julia, Elena Solntseva, Rodion Kondratenko, and Eva Kudova. 2021. "Epipregnanolone as a Positive Modulator of GABAA Receptor in Rat Cerebellar and Hippocampus Neurons" Biomolecules 11, no. 6: 791. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11060791

APA Style

Bukanova, J., Solntseva, E., Kondratenko, R., & Kudova, E. (2021). Epipregnanolone as a Positive Modulator of GABAA Receptor in Rat Cerebellar and Hippocampus Neurons. Biomolecules, 11(6), 791. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11060791

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop