Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide RNA Sequencing of Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells Treated with TGF-β1: Relevance to Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma
Next Article in Special Issue
Message in a Scaffold: Natural Biomaterials for Three-Dimensional (3D) Bioprinting of Human Brain Organoids
Previous Article in Journal
The State of the Dopaminergic and Glutamatergic Systems in the Valproic Acid Mouse Model of Autism Spectrum Disorder
Previous Article in Special Issue
Plasma of Argon Treatment of the Implant Surface, Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Digital Light Processing 3D Printing of Gyroid Scaffold with Isosorbide-Based Photopolymer for Bone Tissue Engineering

Biomolecules 2022, 12(11), 1692; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12111692
by Fiona Verisqa 1, Jae-Ryung Cha 2, Linh Nguyen 1,3, Hae-Won Kim 3,4,5 and Jonathan C. Knowles 1,3,4,5,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Biomolecules 2022, 12(11), 1692; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12111692
Submission received: 15 October 2022 / Revised: 10 November 2022 / Accepted: 12 November 2022 / Published: 15 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Printing Biological and Medical Application)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

please see attached pdf

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We have edited ALL the points as requested. Our edits are marked in the reply to the reviewer document in RED and any edits in the manuscript are also in red for ease of finding.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript from Fiona Verisqa et al. designed CSMA-2, a photopolymer based on Isosorbide, were used to evaluate as bone substitute for regeneration using DLP printing.

This manuscript describes the physicochemical and biological properties of 3D Printing of Gyroid Scaffold. In this study, 3D printed CSMA-2 porous gyroid scaffold containing with different HA% have adequate compressive modulus and good biocompatibility and to improve hADSC proliferation and osteogenesis process. Although it is not extensive in some aspects and some pieces of data are missing, it involves a potential material possibility that allow the 3D printing fabrication of complex biomimetic scaffolds for bone regeneration. Thus, in my opinion, this work could perhaps be considered at “Biomolecules” after minor revisions.

Minor:

1.        We are curious about the adhesion of hADSC on 3D printed CSMA-2 porous gyroid scaffold. Could authors provide SEM images that could show the morphology/ topography images for more detail?

2.        Based on Fig.11, the result is not enough to support the value of significant different. Please add detailed description for the different between 3 group with various periods.

3.        The qualitative and quantitative analysis of RUNX2, OPN and OCN show in Fig. 8-12. According to HA can interact with the cells and generate potential inductive to differentiate into the osteolineage. Could authors describe for more detail the correlation?

4.        The development, formation, and homeostasis of bone tissue involve mesenchymal cell lineages in the synthesis, deposition, and remodeling of type I collagen. Have authors consider to analyze the expression of synthesis of type I collagen?

Author Response

We have answered ALL four comments made by the referee with extra data and also added extra text into the manuscript (highlighted in red for ease of finding.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I want to thank the authors for their reviews and targeted interventions. The manuscript looks much better now, I consent to its publication.

Back to TopTop