Next Article in Journal
Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress and Cell Death in Podocytopathies
Next Article in Special Issue
Biomolecular Strategies for Vascular Bundle Development to Improve Crop Yield
Previous Article in Journal
Brain Vascular Microenvironments in Cancer Metastasis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping Combined with RNA Sequencing Reveals the Molecular Basis of Seed Germination in Oilseed Rape
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fine Mapping and Characterization of a Major Gene Responsible for Chlorophyll Biosynthesis in Brassica napus L.

1
State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
2
Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Afairs, Institute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
3
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biomolecules 2022, 12(3), 402; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12030402
Submission received: 4 January 2022 / Revised: 24 February 2022 / Accepted: 1 March 2022 / Published: 4 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genomics-Assisted Breeding: Strategies, Advances and Challenges)

Abstract

:
Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) is mainly used for oil production and industrial purposes. A high photosynthetic efficiency is the premise of a high yield capable of meeting people’s various demands. Chlorophyll-deficient mutants are ideal materials for studying chlorophyll biosynthesis and photosynthesis. In a previous study, we obtained the mutant yl1 for leaf yellowing throughout the growth period by ethyl methanesulfonate mutagenesis of B. napus. A genetic analysis showed that the yl1 chlorophyll-deficient phenotype was controlled by one incompletely dominant gene, which was mapped on chromosome A03 by a quantitative trait loci sequencing analysis and designated as BnA03.Chd in this study. We constructed an F2 population containing 5256 individuals to clone BnA03.Chd. Finally, BnA03.Chd was fine-mapped to a 304.7 kb interval of the B. napus ‘ZS11’ genome containing 58 annotated genes. Functional annotation, transcriptome, and sequence variation analyses confirmed that BnaA03g0054400ZS, a homolog of AT5G13630, was the most likely candidate gene. BnaA03g0054400ZS encodes the H subunit of Mg-chelatase. A sequence analysis revealed a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), causing an amino-acid substitution from glutamic acid to lysine (Glu1349Lys). In addition, the molecular marker BnaYL1 was developed based on the SNP of BnA03.Chd, which perfectly cosegregated with the chlorophyll-deficient phenotype in two different F2 populations. Our results provide insight into the molecular mechanism underlying chlorophyll synthesis in B. napus.

1. Introduction

Rapeseed (Brassica napus L., AACC, 2n = 38) is an important source of vegetable oil worldwide and is also used to produce biodiesel, ethanol, lubricant oil, and other industrial goods [1]. Compared to traditional diesel, biodiesel produces less greenhouse gases, and the energy per unit volume of biodiesel is higher [2]. Through the improvement of traditional rapeseed varieties, the cake of double-low rapeseed (low erucic acid and low glucosinolate content) can also be used to produce livestock feed [3]. The use of rapeseed oil for nonfood applications has increased rapidly since 2000 [1]. Therefore, under the background of limited arable high-quality land resources, researchers need to continuously increase rapeseed yield per unit land area to meet the demand for industrial and edible oils. Photosynthesis is the most important chemical reaction on earth, and a high crop yield requires a high photosynthetic efficiency. It is of great significance to study plant photosynthesis to improve photosynthetic efficiency.
In Arabidopsis, there are 15 enzymes encoded by 27 genes involved in the biosynthesis of chlorophyll [4]. Any gene mutation causing a blockage in chlorophyll synthesis and, hence, pigment ratio changes can result in phenotypes with varying degrees of green color deficiency [5,6]. Various leaf color mutants have been obtained through mutation, gene editing, and other methods in Arabidopsis [7], rice [8], maize [9], soybean [10], and wheat [11]. Some leaf color mutants have also been isolated in B. napus [12,13]. The inhibiting expression of the gene encoding glutamate-1-semialdehyde aminotransferase in the chlorophyll synthesis pathway can affect the chlorophyll content of B. napus seeds [14]. If the expression of the chlorophyll a oxygenase gene was blocked during chlorophyll synthesis in Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis, there would be a chlorophyll-deficient phenotype [15]. Zhao et al. isolated a yellow-virescent leaf (yvl) mutant in B. napus, and the gene encoded H subunit of magnesium chelatase (MgCH) was considered the most likely candidate gene responsible for the yvl phenotype [16]. A single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) generated a premature stop codon, which impaired the protein structure and reduced the activity of the H subunit of MgCH (ChlH) [16].
Previous research had established that MgCH catalyzes the conversion of protoporphyrin IX (Proto IX) to Mg-Proto IX, which is the first step unique to chlorophyll synthesis [17]. MgCH is a large, multisubunit complex. The catalytic reaction needs cooperative action between the three subunits of MgCH: the catalytic subunit ChlH, where the insertion of Mg2+ takes place, and two AAA+ subunits (ChlI and ChlD) [17,18]. The function of the three subunits has been studied in several crops, such as rice [19], soybean [20], and Arabidopsis [21,22]. The crystal structure of ChlH of photosynthetic cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC 6803 includes six domains (I–VI). The active site of ChlH is buried inside the protein interior and the surrounding amino acid residues are conserved [17]. Mutations in genes encoding any subunit of MgCH may cause chlorophyll synthesis to be blocked [19,21]. Most chloroplast proteins are encoded by nuclear genes, and a few are encoded and regulated by cytoplasmic genes. The signal transduction between the nucleus and chloroplast affects the synthesis of chlorophyll. Genomes uncoupled (GUN) loci have been identified as components of the plastid-to-nucleus signal transduction in Arabidopsis. Mochizuki et al. (2001) cloned the GUN5 gene in Arabidopsis and showed that it encodes ChlH [21]. A mutation at a conserved site of ChlH (Ala990Val) caused a genomes uncoupled phenotype [17,21]. Therefore, ChlH not only participates in the catalysis as a subunit of MgCH, but also plays an important role in the plastid-to-nucleus signal transduction. At the same time, ChlH is an abscisic acid (ABA) receptor, which specifically binds ABA and regulates seed germination, postgermination growth, and stomatal movement [23]. The GUN4 protein activates MgCH by binding with the ChlH [24].
In addition to those enzymes directly involved in the chlorophyll synthesis pathway, other pathways also affect chlorophyll synthesis and, hence, the chlorophyll content. The chlorophyll intermediate Mg-Proto IX accumulates and negatively regulates the expression of photosynthetic genes under stress conditions [25,26]. At the same time, from 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) to Proto IX, there is a common precursor for chlorophyll and heme biosynthesis. Proto IX is located at the branch point of heme and chlorophyll biosynthesis. Therefore, the impairment of heme and other pathways also affects the biosynthesis of chlorophyll by multiple regulatory mechanisms. An overaccumulation of heme is known to inhibit the activity of glutamyl-tRNA reductase (GluTR) in a feedback manner [27]. For example, mutations in the gene encoding heme oxygenase 1, involved in heme breakdown, showed a chlorophyll-deficient phenotype in the B. napus mutant ygl [28]. The transcription of plastid genes was performed by two types of RNA polymerase in higher plants, plastid-encoded polymerase (PEP) inherited from their cyanobacterial ancestor, and nuclear-encoded polymerase (NEP). Many photosynthesis-related genes are transcribed by PEP (class I), whereas some genes are only transcribed by NEP (class III). On the other hand, many other housekeeping genes are transcribed by both PEP and NEP (class II) [29]. PEP activity affects chloroplast biogenesis and photosynthesis [30]. Compared to other crops, there are still few published studies on leaf color mutants in B. napus, with only a few of the corresponding genes having been identified. B. napus is a tetraploid species, which originated from a hybridization between B. rapa (AA, 2n = 20) and B. oleracea (CC, 2n = 18) around 7500 years ago. The publication of the “Darmor-bzh” genome has greatly promoted the study of gene cloning and function in B. napus [31]. In previous studies, we obtained the mutant yl1 with a pale-green phenotype. Compared to NY18, the average plant height, branch height, and 1000-seed weight of yl1 decreased by ~20%, 60%, and 34.5%, respectively. At the seedling stage, the contents of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and the carotenoids of yl1 also significantly decreased [32]. The present study was designed to fine map the gene responsible for the chlorophyll deficiency phenotype in mutant yl1, using the quantitative trait loci sequencing (QTL-Seq) analysis and map-based cloning strategies. A functional marker, based on the target gene, was developed which cosegregated with the chlorophyll-deficient phenotype. This work promotes plant breeding based on molecular marker-assisted selection (MAS) breeding and the exploration of molecular mechanisms that regulate chlorophyll biosynthesis in B. napus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

The chlorophyll-deficient mutant yl1 was isolated from ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS)-mutagenized lines of a conventional B. napus variety Ningyou 18 (NY18) bred by Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China [32]. The mutagenic process of materials followed the description of Wang et al. [33]. Mature seeds of NY18 were soaked in 1.0% EMS solution (w/v, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 12 h at 25 °C in pH 7.0 phosphate buffer. The mutagenized seeds were sown in the field after being rinsed with water for 4 h. The characters of mutagenized individuals were monitored throughout the entire growth period, and individual plants with chlorophyll deficiency were bagged at the flowering stage. The chlorophyll-deficient mutant yl1 was propagated by multiple generations of self-pollination and was shown to be stably inherited.
The (NY18 × yl1) F2 population, derived from a cross between NY18 and yl1 containing 264 individual lines, was used for QTL-Seq [34]. The (Holly × yl1) F2 population, which contained 5256 individuals, was used as a segregating population for fine mapping of the candidate gene associated with the chlorophyll-deficient phenotype. The (ZS11 × yl1) F2 population derived from ZS11 crossed with yl1, which contained 368 individuals, and the (NY18 × yl1) F2 lines were used to verify the effectiveness of functional molecular markers. All individual plants were grown in the experimental plot of Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

2.2. Quantitative Trait Loci Sequencing Analysis

The leaf color of individual plants of the (NY18 × yl1) F2 population was observed at the seedling stage, and the SPAD value was measured using a SPAD-502 m (Konica-Minolta, Tokyo, Japan). The previous statistical results showed that the SPAD value of wild-type plants was >20, the SPAD value of the homozygous mutant plants was <10, and the heterozygous value was between 10 and 20 [32]. The phenotypic characteristic was determined according to the SPAD value of the single plant. The young leaves of 25 wild-type lines (G) and 25 homozygous mutant lines (Y) were collected and stored at −80 °C. Plant Genomic DNA Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) was used to extract genomic DNA. The genomic DNA G-pool and Y-pool were constructed by mixing equal proportions of the respective individual DNAs. The purity and integrity of DNA were analyzed by spectrophotometry with a Nanodrop 2000 instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively.
The resequenced data of the two parents and the two F2 bulks were generated using the Illumina HiSeq™ PE150 (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) platform by Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). To make sure reads were reliable and without artificial bias in the following analyses, raw reads of fast format were firstly processed through a series of quality control (QC) procedures in-house C scripts. QC standards were as follows: (1) removing reads with ≥10% unidentified nucleotides, >50% bases having phred quality <5; (2) removing reads with >10 nt aligned to the adapter, allowing ≤10% mismatches; (3) removing putative PCR duplicates generated by PCR amplification in the library construction process. Clean reads were aligned against the reference genomes of “ZS11” [35] and “Darmor-bzh” [31] using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) software [36] and repetitive read pairs were removed using the Sequence Alignment Map tools [37]. The SNPs in all the samples were detected using the Unified Genotyper module of GATK software and filtered using the Variant Filtration parameter [38]. To identify candidate regions associated with the chlorophyll-deficient trait, the SNP-index and Δ(SNP-index) were calculated for all genomic positions in the G-pool and Y-pool, using the genotype of NY18 as the reference. SNP-index values were calculated in sliding windows of 1 Mb with a 10 Kb step and the average SNP-index value for each window was recorded along the chromosome. The Δ(SNP-index) = SNP-index (Y-pool) − SNP-index (G-pool) [33].

2.3. Fine Mapping of Candidate Genes

Penta-primer amplification refractory mutation system (PARMS) technology is a newly developed SNP genotyping method based on fluorescence detection [39]. After identifying the candidate interval for the target gene by QTL-Seq, PARMS SNP markers were used to screen recombinant plants for fine mapping among the (Holly × yl1) F2 population, with total DNAs of (Holly × yl1) F2 individuals being extracted from fresh rapeseed leaves using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide method [40].
According to the parental resequencing information, homozygous SNPs were selected to design PARMS SNP markers. The 200 bp sequences upstream and downstream of the selected SNP (401 bp in total) were submitted to the SNP automatic typing tool (http://www.snpway.com/ (accessed on 29 April 2019)) to design the primers for PARMS SNP markers (Supplementary Table S1). The master mix for PARMS markers was obtained from Gentides Biotech Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). First, the SNPs at each end of the candidate interval were used to develop two PARMS molecular markers. These two markers were used to screen individuals of the (Holly × yl1) F2 population for the chlorophyll-deficient phenotype. Plants combining yellow leaf color and low chlorophyll content (expressed as SPAD value), with exchange recombination between the two markers, were identified by screening. The recombinant plants were then analyzed with the newly developed polymorphic PARMS SNP markers.

2.4. RNA Library Construction and RNA-Seq Analysis

Equivalent weights of leaves from wild-type NY18 and mutant yl1, with three biological replicates each, were collected at the seedling stage. RNA library construction and sequencing followed the description of Wang et al. [33]. RNA-Seq was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform by Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The reads containing adapters, poly-Ns, and low-quality reads among the raw reads from RNA-Seq were processed using Trimmomatic version 0.36 [41]. The sequencing quality was evaluated by GC content, base mass value (Q20, Q30), and other indicators. Then, clean reads were mapped to the reference genome “Darmor-bzh” [26] using TopHat version 2.0.6 [42]. The distribution of reads on each sample transcript was calculated to evaluate the randomness of RNA-Seq using the RNA-Seq Quality Control package (RSeQC) [43]. Differential expression analyses were carried out to locate differentially expressed genes (DEGs), with a false discovery rate < 0.05 and |log2fold change| ≥ 1, using the DESeq R package (1.10.1). To discern the functions of DEGs, DEGs were submitted to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) website (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/ (accessed on 1 June 2018)), and the KEGG of DEGs was performed using the KOBAS online analysis database [44].

2.5. Gene Cloning and Structure Prediction

To further study the causes of chlorophyll deficiency in mutant yl1, we performed sequence analysis on candidate genes. According to the B. napus “ZS11” reference genome, primers were designed to clone the cDNA sequences of the putative candidate genes by Primer Premier version 5.0 (Table 1). PCR amplification was performed according to the procedures shown in Supplementary Table S2. The PCR products were sequenced by Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The cDNA and protein sequence alignments were performed using DNAMAN software (https://www.lynnon.com/dnaman.html (accessed on 21 June 2019)). The mutated sequence was submitted to the Phyre2 web portal for protein prediction and analysis [45].

2.6. Gene Expression Analysis by Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

To study the expression of candidate genes in various tissues, we took the second leaf at three-leaf stage, the third leaf at five-leaf stage, the upper stem at bolting stage, and the silique shell at pod-formation stage for qRT-PCR. SYBR Green I was used as the fluorescent dye, and the reference gene was the Actin-7 (GenBank: AF111812.1) gene [46]. Primers (Table 1) were designed using the Primer Premier 5.0 program [47]. The qRT-PCR was performed on the ABI-7500 fluorescence quantitative PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The 2−ΔΔCt method was used to calculate the relative expression levels of the candidate gene in different tissues [48].

2.7. Developing Molecular Marker

To utilize the chlorophyll-deficient mutant yl1, a PARMS molecular marker was designed based on the SNP of the candidate gene and named BnaYL1, using the SNP decoder tool (http://www.snpway.com/snp-decoder01/ (accessed on 12 August 2019)). The universal primers that were consistent with the latter half sequences of the two forward primers had different fluorescent marks at the tail, with FAM/HEX universal fluorescent primers preset in the 2× PARMS Master Mix (Gentides, Wuhan, China). The synthesis of primer and marker detection was carried out by Gentides Biotech Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China).

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analyses of the results of qRT-PCR in this study were performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test. The number of biological repeats was annotated in each experiment.

3. Results

3.1. Phenotypic Characterization and Genetic Analysis

The yl1 gene mutation resulted in the chlorophyll deficiency of the mutant plants throughout the entire growth period. Compared with wild-type NY18, the leaves of yl1 were significantly yellowed at the seedling stage (Figure 1A,B). As the plants grew, the cotyledons still showed the chlorophyll-deficient phenotype, but the color of the more mature leaves turned slightly greener (Figure 1C). The above phenotypic characteristics were described in another article in our laboratory [32]. At the same time, the flower buds and siliques, the main photosynthetic organ after the flowering of yl1, also showed the obvious chlorophyll-deficient trait (Figure 1D,F). The size of the flowers and siliques in yl1 was significantly smaller than those in NY18 (Figure 1E,F). The plant height and 1000-seed weight were significantly higher in NY18 than in yl1 [32].

3.2. Initial Localization of Candidate Genes

Genomic DNA from NY18, yl1, and the two F2 bulks (G- and Y-pools) was sequenced, and generated clean reads amounting to 100.7 Gb. The sequencing quality was high (Q20 ≥ 95.28%, Q30 ≥ 88.52%). The reads were aligned to the B. napus ‘ZS11’ reference genome, and the comparison rate for all samples was between 97.25% and 98.52% (Supplementary Table S3). The depths of sequencing coverage for the G-pool, Y-pool, NY18, and yl1 were 39.82-fold, 33.75-fold, 16.79-fold, and 17.88-fold, respectively. The coverage of 1× (at least one base) was more than 92.89% (Supplementary Table S3). All samples had sufficient data, the GC distribution was normal, and the library sequencing was successful, allowing it to be used for subsequent mutation detection.
Based on the results of genotyping, 17,734 polymorphic SNPs with homozygous differences between the two parents were identified by screening after filtration. The SNP-indexes of the two pools on chromosome C06 distributed in the range of 0–1, and there was no case where the SNP-index values of the two pools were close to 1 and 0, respectively, due to the linkage with the target gene. The main gene heritability of F2 generation was 96.42% [32]. The genomic region from 1.50 to 5.19 Mb on chromosome A03, designated as BnA03.Chd, had an average Δ(SNP-index) of 0.64 at a α = 0.05 significance level, suggesting that this region included a major gene for the chlorophyll-deficient phenotype (Figure 2).

3.3. Fine Mapping of the BnA03.Chd Gene

The leaf color phenotype was judged by the SPAD value, and 1524 chlorophyll-deficient individuals with a SPAD value of less than 10 from the (Holly × yl1) F2 segregation population were selected at the seedling stage for fine mapping. First, two flanking PARMS SNP markers (Supplementary Table S1), M1 (physical position of the B. napus ZS11 chromosome A03: 1,499,657 bp) and M9 (5,194,567 bp), were designed to identify recombinants in the chlorophyll-deficient individuals (Figure 3). The results showed that there were 76 recombinant individuals within the chlorophyll-deficient population, of which 55 recombinant plants were detected in M1 and 21 in M9 (Supplementary Table S4). Then, based on the resequencing information of NY18 and yl1, markers M2 and M8 were designed and used for genotyping the 76 recombinant individuals. The results showed that markers M2 and M8 detected 15 and 17 recombinant plants, respectively. Next, marker M7 on the left-hand side of M8 was designed and obtained nine recombinant plants among the 76 recombinants. Subsequently, M3, M4, M5, and M6 markers between M2 and M7 were designed, which identified six, four, two, and zero recombinant plants, respectively. The marker M6 completely cosegregated with the chlorophyll-deficient trait. Finally, a 304.7 kbp interval between the M5 and M7 markers was determined as the final candidate interval (Figure 3A).

3.4. Genome-Wide Transcriptomic Analyses of NY18 and yl1

After filtering out the low-quality reads, a total of 19.41–23.87 million clean reads for each sample was obtained through high-throughput RNA-Seq (Supplementary Table S5) and aligned to the “Darmor-bzh” reference genome [31]. The results showed that 146 (39.04%) of the genes were significantly upregulated and 228 (60.96%) of the genes were significantly downregulated in the yellow-leafed mutant yl1, compared with its isogenic parent, NY18 (Figure 4A).
Compared to NY18, yl1 had significantly lower levels of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b. There were 15 enzymes encoded by 27 genes involved in the biosynthesis of chlorophyll in Arabidopsis, and a total of 85 B. napus genes was homologous to the 25 of 27 genes (except HEMA3, GSA2, and HEMF2) (Figure 4B, Supplementary Table S6). Among the 85 genes, there were significant differences in the expression levels of different genes, and 12 of them were not expressed at all in either NY18 or yl1 based on RNA-seq data. However, there was no significant difference in the expression of all 85 genes between NY18 and yl1. In Arabidopsis, 5-aminolevulinate dehydratase was encoded by ALAD1 and ALAD2, but ALAD1 was the major contributor at this step [49]. In normal circumstances, PORA mRNA disappeared within the first 4 h of greening [50]. The chloroplasts of yl1 were abnormal and underdeveloped, and the thylakoids were loosely distributed [32]. We collected 44 B. napus genes, which were homologous to the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins of the photosystem genes in Arabidopsis (Supplementary Table S7). Surprisingly, only one homolog (BnaA02g29010D) was significantly differentially expressed between NY18 and yl1.
The up- and down-regulated genes were enriched with respect to 14 and 16 pathways, respectively (Supplementary Table S8). KEGG enrichment results showed that there were more DEGs enriched in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, metabolic pathways, and circadian rhythm (Figure 4C). The Golden 2-like (GLK) transcription factor is one of a pair of partially redundant nuclear transcription factors that regulate chloroplast development in a cell-autonomous manner in Arabidopsis [51]. Compared with NY18, the expression of homologous genes of GLK decreased significantly in yl1. The LHC super-gene family encodes the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding (LHC) proteins, and Lhcb2.4 was markedly down-regulated in yl1 (Supplementary Table S7). On the contrary, chlorophyllase 2, the first enzyme in chlorophyll degradation, increased significantly in yl1 (Supplementary Table S7).

3.5. Identification of a Candidate Gene

According to the gene annotations of the “ZS11” reference genome [35], there were 56 genes in the BnA03.Chd interval after removing two homologous genes (Supplementary Table S9). RNA-Seq results showed that none of the genes in the BnA03.Chd region were significantly differently expressed between NY18 and yl1. The resequencing alignment results showed that 15 genes had mutations in exons, among which 2 genes had frameshift deletion mutations, 3 genes had nonsynonymous mutations, and 10 genes had synonymous mutations. According to the principle of EMS mutagenesis, the mutation types were mostly of a single-base transition or transversion mutation, but BnaA03G0052800ZS and BnaA03G0052900ZS genes had frameshift deletion mutations. Moreover, the annotated information of the genes with a deletion mutation showed there was no correlation with chlorophyll synthesis, so BnaA03G0052800ZS and BnaA03G0052900ZS were excluded. The resequencing results showed that there was no expression of BnaA03G0055600ZS and BnaA03G0056500ZS with nonsynonymous mutants in NY18 or yl1, suggesting that the two genes could not be candidate genes for the chlorophyll-deficient trait. Therefore, the only remaining gene BnaA03G0054400ZS was preliminarily identified as the candidate gene for the chlorophyll-deficient trait.
Previous studies in B. napus and Arabidopsis have shown that the gene encodes ChlH and is evolutionarily conserved [16,21]. BnaA03G0054400ZS, a homolog of AT5G13630, encodes the H subunit of MgCH, which is heavily involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis and chloroplast development. MgCH initiates the chlorophyll biosynthetic pathway by inserting Mg2+ into the protoporphyrin macrocycle. ChlH is the insertion site of magnesium ions by Mg-chelatase.

3.6. Sequence Analysis of the Candidate Gene for BnA03.Chd

Based on the reference sequence of BnaA03G0054400ZS, we designed primers (Table 1) to amplify the cDNA of the isogenic wild-type NY18 and mutant yl1. The sequencing results of amplification products showed that the full-length of the coding sequence (CDS) of BnaA03G0054400ZS was 4149 bp. DNA sequence alignment showed that there was no difference in the promoter sequences between the two lines, but that there was a base substitution (G to A) at 4045 bp of the CDS in the fifth exon in yl1 (Figure 5). The amino acid at the 1349th position was transformed from glutamic acid to lysine (i.e., E to K) (Supplementary Figure S1). The results of structure prediction showed that the secondary structure of the site did not change after mutation (Supplementary Figure S2A). The mutation site was located in the domain VI of ChlH (Supplementary Figure S1) and not in the proto-binding pocket of ChlH (Supplementary Figure S2B).

3.7. Expression Analysis of the Candidate Genes

The results of RNA-seq showed that the transcription level of BnaA03G0054400ZS in leaves of both NY18 and yl1 had no significant difference (Supplementary Table S9). To further investigate the specific gene expression pattern, the expression level of BnaA03G0054400ZS in the leaf, stem, flower bud, and silique shell of NY18 and yl1 was analysis by qRT-PCR (Supplementary Table S10). The results showed that the expression level of BnaA03G0054400ZS in all tested tissues of yl1 was not significantly different from that of NY18 (Figure 6). In B. napus, leaves are the main photosynthetic organs before full flowering, and the expression of the BnaA03G0054400ZS gene was the highest in leaves. In nonmajor photosynthetic tissues such as the stem and bud, the expression level of BnaA03G0054400ZS was relatively low (Figure 6). This was consistent with the changing trend of expression levels of the candidate gene in various organs of ZS11 in the transcriptome database of B. napus (http://yanglab.hzau.edu.cn/BnTIR/expression_show (accessed on 10 January 2022)).

3.8. Development of the PARMS Marker for BnA03.Chd

Based on the SNP of the candidate gene BnaA03G0054400ZS, we designed a PARMS marker, BnaYL1 (Table 1). Subsequently, the effectiveness of this marker was verified in two different populations. The (ZS11 × yl1) F2 population contained 368 individuals, in which fluorescence signals could be detected by BnaYL1 in 366 of the 368 samples. FAM fluorophore could be detected in 94 samples, and the plants corresponding to these samples showed the wild-type phenotype. FAM/HEX fluorophore signals were detected in 195 samples, and the corresponding plants exhibited the heterozygote phenotype. HEX fluorophore signals were detected in 77 samples, which corresponded to the homozygous mutant phenotype (Figure 7A). The marker BnaYL1 cosegregated perfectly with the chlorophyll-deficient phenotype in the (ZS11 × yl1) F2 population. In the individual plants in the (NY18 × yl1) F2 population, 107 wild-type homozygotes, 183 heterozygotes, and 83 mutant homozygotes were detected by BnaYL1, a finding which was completely consistent with the phenotypes (Figure 7B). The results showed that BnaYL1 had a high genotyping efficiency and could be used for MAS in the future. In addition, BnaYL1 cosegregated with the chlorophyll-deficient phenotype in both the (ZS11 × yl1) F2 and (NY18 × yl1) F2 populations, providing further proof that the BnaA03G0054400ZS gene is a potential candidate gene for yl1.

4. Discussion

B. napus is an important source of vegetable oil and biofuel in the world. However, in recent years, the improvement of rapeseed yield has encountered bottlenecks, and new technological progress is urgently needed to improve rapeseed yield. Efficient photosynthesis is an important factor in achieving a high yield in crops.
So far, all genes encoding chlorophyll synthesis in Arabidopsis have been cloned [52]. Many leaf color genes have been mapped in crops, such as rice [5,53,54], maize [9,55], and others [10,56]. However, there have still been relatively few studies on leaf color control sites in B. napus, with only a few leaf color genes being cloned [14,57,58]. Compared with other crops, the main photosynthetic organs switch from the leaves to pods in B. napus, from about two weeks after full flowering [59]. If the chlorophyll synthesis is blocked in leaves and pods, the yield of rapeseed is significantly reduced. In a previous study, we obtained a new chlorophyll-deficient mutant of B. napus by EMS mutagenesis. The leaves and siliques of this mutant showed a chlorophyll-deficient phenotype (Figure 1B,F), which could be used to study the photosynthesis of leaves and siliques. In this study, the candidate gene-encoded ChlH was obtained by map-based cloning, and a sequence analysis revealed a base substitution (G to A), causing an amino-acid substitution from glutamic acid to lysine in domain VI of ChlH at position 1349 (Supplementary Figure S1).
MgCH, a key enzyme in chlorophyll synthesis, catalyzes the conversion of proto IX to Mg-proto IX. MgCH contains three subunits, ChlI, ChlD and ChlH, of which ChlH contains the insertion site of the magnesium ion for the catalytic reaction. The structure and function of ChlH have been studied extensively [18,20,21,60]. However, there are few studies on ChlH in Brassica. We identified the ortholog of the gene in Arabidopsis that encodes the H subunit of MgCH as being the candidate gene in B napus mutant yl1. A single base substitution, deletion, addition, or structural variation in a gene may cause a gene mutation. Zhao et al. also found the mutation yvl, resulting in a chlorophyll-deficient phenotype, in the BnaA03g04440D gene. The gene is the same as BnaA03G0054400ZS. A single nucleotide substitution in BnaA03g04440D led to the premature termination of the expression of the gene. All amino acids after 1371 (Ser) in yvl were deleted, and the last α-helix structure at the C-terminus was destroyed [16]. Zhao et al. concluded that the impairment of PEP activity may lead to the impairment of chloroplast development and chlorophyll degradation in yvl [16]. However, we think the genes they studied were actually nuclear genes rather than plastid genes. In mutant yl1, the 1349th amino acid in ChlH changed from glutamic acid to lysine (E to K), but did not terminate expression prematurely (Supplementary Figure S1). The expression level of the candidate gene in yvl was significantly lower than that in the wild-type, but the expression level in yl1 was not significantly different to NY18 (Figure 6). At maturity, compared with the wild-type plants, the agronomic traits of yvl had no significant difference in the plant height, 1000-seed weight, and other traits. However, the main agronomic traits of yl1 were greatly affected [32]. The two mutants exhibited mutations in the same gene, but the mutation site and the expression patterns of the two mutants were quite different. There were fewer DEGs in mutant yl1, but it had a greater impact on agronomic traits. This indicated that the amino acid (Glu1349) located in domain VI of ChlH may be a conserved amino acid that plays an important role in the ChlH function (Supplementary Figure S1).
The ChlH, where the insertion of Mg2+ takes place, is the catalytic subunit of MgCH [17]; therefore, the mutation of ChlH may affect the activity of MgCH, and the synthesis of chlorophyll was blocked in yl1. There is much evidence suggesting that chlorophyll is needed for the stabilization of LHC [61,62,63]. In the research of the chlorina f2 mutant lacking chlorophyll b of barley, the mutant contained mRNA for membrane polypeptides present in the mutant at levels comparable to those of wild-type as determined by the uptake assay; the absence of chlorophyll b caused these polypeptides to turn over rapidly [63]. In yl1, the results of RNA-seq showed there were no significant changes in the gene expression levels of most LHC subunits. However, Lhcb2.4 was significantly downregulated, and Zhao et al. also found that Lhcb2.4 reduced in yvl (Supplementary Table S7) [16]. There could be some mechanism that specifically downregulates Lhcb2.4. ChlH is not only a key gene in the chlorophyll synthesis pathway, but is also involved in the transmission of the plastid-derived signal. Under normal circumstances, the gun mutation causes an abnormal accumulation of Lhcb genes. Kindgren et al. found that the repression of Lhcb following a high-light treatment in gun5 was similar to the repression observed in the wild-type [63]. Therefore, we speculated that the light conditions when sampling may have caused the abnormal decrease in the expression of Lhcb2.4. The results of structure prediction showed that the secondary structure of the mutant site did not change (Supplementary Figure S2B). There were no significant expression differences of ChlH. Mutations may affect the stability of ChlH. The GUN5 gene, which encodes ChlH, was identified as a component of the plastid-to-nucleus signal transduction [21]. Previous studies have shown that GLK genes were responsive to plastid retrograde signals and helped to coregulate and synchronize the expression of a suite of nuclear photosynthetic genes [64]. Golden 2-like regulates chloroplast development in Arabidopsis, and GLK genes strongly regulate ChlH, the LHC super-gene family, and other genes involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis [64]. The results of RNA-seq showed that the transcript level of GLK1 significantly decreased, and GLK2 decreased slightly (Supplementary Table S7). We speculated that the instability of LHC complexes without chlorophylls would be the primary cause of the impaired chloroplast development in this mutant, and the regulation of plastid signaling may have an additional effect. In yl1, the expression of CLH2 involved in chlorophyll decomposition was significantly increased, which aggravated the chlorophyll deficiency phenotype.
A large number of genes have been mapped using simple sequence repeats [57], in/Dels [55,57], amplified fragment length polymorphisms [65], and other marker systems. The analysis by DNA electrophoresis, a process which is very time-consuming, is needed when ordinary molecular markers are applied to plant breeding and gene mapping. Moreover, compared to SNP markers, traditional molecular markers have the disadvantages of fewer markers and an uneven distribution. Based on SNPs, researchers have developed competitive allele-specific PCR [66], PARMS [39], and other genotyping techniques. High-throughput genotyping can be carried out by scanning the fluorescence type, eliminating the need for DNA gel electrophoresis and other complex operations. At the same time, researchers also developed a method that can be genotyped by ordinary PCR in the laboratory, based on SNP loci [33]. In the present study, PARMS SNP markers were designed to fine map the candidate gene. To facilitate researchers to use this germplasm resource, a PARMS functional marker BnaYL1 for mutation sites in yl1 was developed, and the test results showed that BnaYL1 was completely cosegregated with the chlorophyll-deficient phenotype in different populations.

5. Conclusions

In our previous study, a chlorophyll-deficient mutant, yl1, was obtained by EMS mutagenesis, and the candidate gene was fine-mapped to an interval of 304.7 kb on chromosome A03 by QTL-Seq and map-based cloning strategies. Within this interval, 58 annotated or predicted genes were identified in “ZS11” reference genomes. Combining the results of the functional annotation analysis, transcriptome analyses, expression analysis, and sequence variation analysis, BnaA03G0054400ZS, which encodes the H subunit of MgCH, was considered the most likely candidate gene. An SNP in the fifth exon of BnaA03G0054400ZS caused an amino-acid substitution (Glu1349Lys). This mutation may affect the stability of CHLH, thereby affecting the expression of genes involved in the regulation of chloroplast development and chlorophyll degradation. Based on the SNP, a function molecular marker BnaYL1 was developed, which was completely cosegregated with the chlorophyll deficiency phenotype in two different F2 populations. These results enhanced our understanding of chlorophyll synthesis in B. napus.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biom12030402/s1, Figure S1: the amino-acid sequence difference of protein encoded by BnaA03G0054400ZS gene between NY18 and yl1, Figure S2: the prediction of protein spatial structure of the mutation sites, Table S1: primer sequences of PARMS markers used for fine mapping the BnA03.Chd locus, Table S2: the PCR reaction system of candidate gene cloning, Table S3: summary of resequenced data of the two parents (NY18 and yl1) and the two F2 bulks (G- and Y-pool), Table S4: seventy-six recombinants and their genotypes detected by marker M1 and M9 in 1524 chlorophyll-deficient individuals of (Holly × yl1) F2 population, Table S5: summary of transcriptome data of leaves from wild-type NY18 and mutant yl1, Table S6: the expression level of all genes in the chlorophyll synthesis pathway, Table S7: transcriptional changes of differential expression genes between NY18 and yl1 based on RNA-seq data, Table S8: differentially expressed genes in different enriched KEGG pathways, Table S9: the annotated genes in BnA03.Chd interval of ZS11 genome, Table S10: the specific data and statistical analysis results of qRT-PCR of NY18 and yl1.

Author Contributions

Data curation, C.P. and W.Z.; formal analysis, C.S.; funding acquisition, W.Z., X.W. (Xiaodong Wang) and J.Z.; investigation, M.P., X.Z., R.S., X.W. (Xu Wu) and F.C.; project administration, X.W. (Xiaodong Wang) and J.Z.; software, C.S.; writing—original draft, C.P. and W.Z.; writing—review and editing, X.W. (Xiaodong Wang). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32001580, 31971973), Jiangsu Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Fund (CX(19)3053), China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-12), and the Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw sequence data were deposited in the NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/ (accessed on 18 January 2022)) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject PRJNA804373, with accession numbers SRR17931830, SRR17931831, SRR17931832, SRR17931833, SRR17931834, and SRR17931835. All other data analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information Files.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ABA, abscisic acid; ALA, 5-aminolevulinic acid; ANOVA, analysis of variance; ChlD, D subunit of MgCH; ChlH, H subunit of MgCH; ChlI, I subunit of MgCH; ChlM, magnesium protoporphyrin IX methyltransferase; DEGs, differentially expressed genes; EMS, ethyl methane sulfonate; GluTR, glutamyl-tRNA reductase; GLK, Golden 2-like; MgCH, magnesium chelatase; LSD, least significant difference; Mg-Proto IX, magnesium protoporphyrin IX; NY18, Ningyou18; PARMS, penta-primer amplification refractory mutation system; PEP, plastid-encoded RNA polymerase; Proto IX, protoporphyrin IX; QTL, quantitative trait loci sequencing; SD, standard deviation; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; ZS11, Zhongshuang11.

References

  1. Lu, C.; Napier, J.A.; Clemente, T.E.; Cahoon, E.B. New frontiers in oilseed biotechnology: Meeting the global demand for vegetable oils for food, feed, biofuel, and industrial applications. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 2011, 22, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Durrett, T.P.; Benning, C.; Ohlrogge, J. Plant triacylglycerols as feedstocks for the production of biofuels. Plant J. 2008, 54, 593–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. An, H.; Qi, X.; Gaynor, M.L.; Hao, Y.; Gebken, S.C.; Mabry, M.E.; McAlvay, A.C.; Teakle, G.R.; Conant, G.C.; Barker, M.S.; et al. Transcriptome and organellar sequencing highlights the complex origin and diversification of allotetraploid Brassica napus. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Nagata, N.; Tanaka, R.; Satoh, S.; Tanaka, A. Identification of a vinyl reductase gene for chlorophyll synthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana and implications for the evolution of prochlorococcus species. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Wang, Z.; Hong, X.; Hu, K.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Du, S.; Li, Y.; Hu, D.; Cheng, K.; An, B.; et al. Impaired magnesium protoporphyrin IX methyltransferase (ChlM) impedes chlorophyll synthesis and plant growth in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Frick, G.; Su, Q.; Apel, K.; Armstrong, G.A. An Arabidopsis porB porC double mutant lacking light-dependent NADPH: Protochlorophyllide oxidoreductases B and C is highly chlorophyll-deficient and developmentally arrested. Plant J. 2003, 35, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Runge, S.; van Cleve, B.; Lebedev, N.; Armstrong, G.; Apel, K. Isolation and classification of chlorophyll-deficient xantha mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 1995, 197, 490–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Lv, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, P.; Shi, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; He, Z.; Teng, S. Characterization and fine mapping of a novel rice albino mutant low temperature albino 1. J. Genet. Genom. 2012, 39, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, C.; Wang, J.; Hu, Z.; Xia, Y.; Huang, Q.; Yu, T.; Yi, H.; Lu, Y.; Wang, J.; Cao, M. A valine residue deletion in ZmSig2A, a sigma factor, accounts for a revertible leaf-color mutation in maize. Crop J. 2021, 9, 1330–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhu, X.; Pan, Y.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhong, D.; Duan, Z.; Tian, Z.; Zhu, B.; Zhou, G. Mutation of YL results in a yellow leaf with chloroplast RNA editing defect in soybean. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, C.; Shi, N.; Wu, H.; An, X.; Zheng, J.; Duan, Y.; Sun, D.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, L. Cytogenetic analyses of PSL1 mutant, a novel low-temperature-sensitive purple-striped leaf color mutant in wheat. Crop Sci. 2018, 58, 1919–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, Y.; He, Y.; Yang, M.; He, J.; Xu, P.; Shao, M.; Chu, P.; Guan, R. Fine mapping of a dominant gene conferring chlorophyll-deficiency in Brassica napus. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Zhu, L.; Zeng, X.; Chen, Y.; Yang, Z.; Qi, L.; Pu, Y.; Yi, B.; Wen, J.; Ma, C.; Shen, J.; et al. Genetic characterisation and fine mapping of a chlorophyll-deficient mutant (BnaC.ygl) in Brassica napus. Mol. Breed. 2014, 34, 603–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tsang, E.W.T.; Yang, J.; Chang, Q.; Nowak, G.; Kolenovsky, A.; McGregor, D.I.; Keller, W.A. Chlorophyll reduction in the seed of Brassica napus with a glutamate 1-semialdehyde aminotransferase antisense gene. Plant Mol. Biol. 2003, 51, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, M.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S.; Wu, F.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Shen, S. Characterization of the leaf color mutant hy and identification of the mutated gene in Chinese cabbage. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2018, 143, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Zhao, C.; Liu, L.; Safdar, L.B.; Xie, M.; Cheng, X.; Liu, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Tong, C.; Tu, J.; Huang, J.; et al. Characterization and fine mapping of a yellow-virescent gene regulating chlorophyll biosynthesis and early stage chloroplast development in Brassica napus. G3 Genes Genom. Genet. 2020, 10, 3201–3211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, X.; Pu, H.; Fang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, S.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, M.; Dai, H.-E.; Gong, W.; Liu, L. Crystal structure of the catalytic subunit of magnesium chelatase. Nat. Plants 2015, 1, 15125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Adams, N.B.P.; Marklew, C.J.; Qian, P.; Brindley, A.A.; Davison, P.A.; Bullough, P.A.; Hunter, C.N. Structural and functional consequences of removing the N-terminal domain from the magnesium chelatase ChlH subunit of Thermosynechococcus elongatus. Biochem. J. 2014, 464, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhang, H.; Li, J.; Yoo, J.H.; Yoo, S.C.; Cho, S.H.; Koh, H.J.; Seo, H.S.; Paek, N.C. Rice Chlorina-1 and Chlorina-9 Encode ChlD and ChlI Subunits of Mg-Chelatase, a Key Enzyme for Chlorophyll Synthesis and Chloroplast Development. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 62, 325–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nakayama, M.; Masuda, T.; Bando, T.; Yamagata, H.; Ohta, H.; Takamiya, K. Cloning and expression of the soybean ChlH gene encoding a subunit of Mg-chelatase and localization of the Mg2+ concentration-dependent ChlH protein within the chloroplast. Plant Cell Physiol. 1998, 39, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Mochizuki, N.; Brusslan, J.A.; Larkin, R.; Nagatani, A.; Chory, J. Arabidopsis genomes uncoupled 5 (GUN5) mutant reveals the involvement of Mg-chelatase H subunit in plastid-to-nucleus signal transduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 2053–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Huang, Y.S.; Li, H. Arabidopsis CHLI2 can substitute for CHLI1. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 636–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Shen, Y.Y.; Wang, X.F.; Wu, F.Q.; Du, S.Y.; Cao, Z.; Shang, Y.; Wang, X.L.; Peng, C.C.; Yu, X.C.; Zhu, S.Y.; et al. The Mg-Chelatase H Subunit Is an Abscisic Acid Receptor. Nature 2006, 443, 823–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Adhikari, N.D.; Froehlich, J.E.; Strand, D.D.; Buck, S.M.; Kramer, D.M.; Larkin, R.M. GUN4-porphyrin complexes bind the ChlH/GUN5 subunit of Mg-chelatase and promote chlorophyll biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 1449–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ankele, E.; Kindgren, P.; Pesquet, E.; Strand, Å. In vivo visualization of Mg-protoporphyrinIX, a coordinator of photosynthetic gene expression in the nucleus and the chloroplast. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 1964–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Strand, Å.; Asami, T.; Alonso, J.; Ecker, J.R.; Chory, J. Chloroplast to nucleus communication triggered by accumulation of Mg-protoporphyrinIX. Nature 2003, 421, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pontoppidan, B.; Kannangara, C.G. Purification and partial characterisation of barley Glutamyl-tRNAGlu reductase, the enzyme that directs glutamate to chlorophyll biosynthesis. Eur. J. Biochem. 1994, 225, 529–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhu, L.; Yang, Z.; Zeng, X.; Gao, J.; Liu, J.; Yi, B.; Ma, C.; Shen, J.; Tu, J.; Fu, T.; et al. Heme oxygenase 1 defects lead to reduced chlorophyll in Brassica napus. Plant Mol. Biol. 2017, 93, 579–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Börner, T.; Aleynikova, A.Y.; Zubo, Y.O.; Kusnetsov, V.V. Chloroplast RNA polymerases: Role in chloroplast biogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta—Bioenerg. 2015, 1847, 761–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lv, Y.; Shao, G.; Qiu, J.; Jiao, G.; Sheng, Z.; Xie, L.; Wu, Y.; Tang, S.; Wei, X.; Hu, P. White Leaf and Panicle 2, encoding a PEP-associated protein, is required for chloroplast biogenesis under heat stress in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 5147–5160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Chalhoub, B.; Denoeud, F.; Liu, S.; Parkin, I.A.P.; Tang, H.; Wang, X.; Chiquet, J.; Belcram, H.; Tong, C.; Samans, B.; et al. Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome. Science 2014, 345, 950–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Peng, M.; Zhao, X.; Wang, X.; Chen, F.; Zhang, W.; Sun, C.; Zhang, C.; Guan, R.; Zhang, J. Phenotypic identification and genetic analysis of a chlorophyll deficient mutant yl1 in Brassica napus. Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci. 2021, 43, 443, (In Chinese with an English Abstract). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, X.; Zheng, M.; Liu, H.; Zhang, L.; Chen, F.; Zhang, W.; Fan, S.; Peng, M.; Hu, M.; Wang, H.; et al. Fine-mapping and transcriptome analysis of a candidate gene controlling plant height in Brassica napus L. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2020, 13, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Takagi, H.; Abe, A.; Yoshida, K.; Kosugi, S.; Natsume, S.; Mitsuoka, C.; Uemura, A.; Utsushi, H.; Tamiru, M.; Takuno, S.; et al. QTL-Seq: Rapid mapping of quantitative trait loci in rice by whole genome resequencing of DNA from two bulked populations. Plant J. 2013, 74, 174–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Song, J.; Guan, Z.; Hu, J.; Guo, C.; Yang, Z.; Wang, S.; Liu, D.; Wang, B.; Lu, S.; Zhou, R.; et al. Eight high-quality genomes reveal pan-genome architecture and ecotype differentiation of Brassica napus. Nat. Plants 2020, 6, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, H.; Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with burrows-wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1754–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Li, H.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; Marth, G.; Abecasis, G.; Durbin, R. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2078–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. McKenna, A.; Hanna, M.; Banks, E.; Sivachenko, A.; Cibulskis, K.; Kernytsky, A.; Garimella, K.; Altshuler, D.; Gabriel, S.; Daly, M.; et al. The genome analysis toolkit: A mapreduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010, 20, 1297–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Zhang, B.; Zhao, N.; Liu, Y.; Jia, L.; Fu, Y.; He, X.; Liu, K.; Xu, Z.; Bao, B. Novel molecular markers for high-throughput sex characterization of cynoglossus semilaevis. Aquaculture 2019, 513, 734331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Porebski, S.; Bailey, L.G.; Baum, B.R. Modification of a CTAB DNA extraction protocol for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1997, 15, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Trapnell, C.; Pachter, L.; Salzberg, S.L. TopHat: Discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1105–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, L.; Wang, S.; Li, W. RSeQC: Quality control of RNA-seq experiments. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 2184–2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Xie, C.; Mao, X.; Huang, J.; Ding, Y.; Wu, J.; Dong, S.; Kong, L.; Gao, G.; Li, C.; Wei, L. KOBAS 2.0: A web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 316–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Kelley, L.A.; Mezulis, S.; Yates, C.M.; Wass, M.N.; Sternberg, M.J.E. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2015, 10, 845–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Fujimoto, R.; Sasaki, T.; Nishio, T. Characterization of DNA methyltransferase genes in Brassica rapa. Genes Genet. Syst. 2006, 81, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Singh, V.K.; Mangalam, A.K.; Dwivedi, S.; Naik, S. Primer premier: Program for design of degenerate primers from a protein sequence. BioTechniques 1998, 24, 318–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tang, W.; Wang, W.; Chen, D.; Ji, Q.; Jing, Y.; Wang, H.; Lin, R. Transposase-derived proteins FHY3/FAR1 interact with Phytochrome-Interacting Factor1 to regulate chlorophyll biosynthesis by modulating HEMB1 during deetiolation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 1984–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Armstrong, G.A.; Runge, S.; Frick, G.; Sperling, U.; Apel, K. Identification of NADPH: Protochlorophyllide oxidoreductases A and B: A branched pathway for light-dependent chlorophyll biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1995, 108, 1505–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Fitter, D.W.; Martin, D.J.; Copley, M.J.; Scotland, R.W.; Langdale, J.A. GLK gene pairs regulate chloroplast development in diverse plant species. Plant J. 2002, 31, 713–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Beale, S.I. Green genes gleaned. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 309–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Yang, Q.; He, H.; Li, H.; Tian, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhai, L.; Chen, J.; Wu, H.; Yi, G.; He, Z.-H.; et al. NOA1 functions in a temperature-dependent manner to regulate chlorophyll biosynthesis and rubisco formation in rice. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wu, Z.; Zhang, X.; He, B.; Diao, L.; Sheng, S.; Wang, J.; Guo, X.; Su, N.; Wang, L.; Jiang, L.; et al. A chlorophyll-deficient rice mutant with impaired chlorophyllide esterification in chlorophyll biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Yuan, G.; Tang, C.; Li, Y.; Chen, B.; He, H.; Peng, H.; Zhang, Y.; Gou, C.; Zou, C.; Pan, G.; et al. Identification and fine mapping of a candidate gene for oil yellow leaf 2 conferring yellow leaf phenotype in maize. Plant Breed. 2021, 140, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yang, S.; Tian, X.; Wang, Z.; Wei, X.; Zhao, Y.; Su, H.; Zhao, X.; Tian, B.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, X.W. Fine mapping and candidate gene identification of a white flower gene BrWF3 in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 646222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ye, J.; Liu, H.; Zhao, Z.; Xu, L.; Li, K.; Du, D. Fine mapping of the QTL cqSPDA2 for chlorophyll content in Brassica napus L. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhao, H.; Yu, L.; Huai, Z.; Wang, X.; Ding, G.; Chen, S.; Li, P.; Xu, F. Mapping and candidate gene identification defining BnChd1-1, a locus involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis in Brassica napus. Acta Physiol. Plant 2014, 36, 859–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gammelvind, L.H.; Schjoerring, J.K.; Mogensen, V.O.; Jensen, C.R.; Bock, J.G.H. Photosynthesis in leaves and siliques of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Plant Soil 1996, 186, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Adams, N.B.P.; Bisson, C.; Brindley, A.A.; Farmer, D.A.; Davison, P.A.; Reid, J.D.; Hunter, C.N. The active site of magnesium chelatase. Nat. Plants 2020, 6, 1491–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bennett, J. Biosynthesis of the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein. Eur. J. Biochem. 1981, 118, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bellemare, G.; Bartlett, S.G.; Chua, N.H. Biosynthesis of chlorophyll a/b-binding polypeptides in wild type and the chlorina f2 mutant of barley. J. Biol. Chem. 1982, 257, 7762–7767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kindgren, P.; Kremnev, D.; Blanco, N.E.; de Dios Barajas López, J.; Fernández, A.P.; Tellgren-Roth, C.; Small, I.; Strand, Å. The plastid redox insensitive 2 mutant of Arabidopsis is impaired in PEP activity and high light-dependent plastid redox signalling to the nucleus. Plant J. 2012, 70, 279–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Waters, M.T.; Wang, P.; Korkaric, M.; Capper, R.G.; Saunders, N.J.; Langdale, J.A. GLK transcription factors coordinate expression of the photosynthetic apparatus in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 1109–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Schierholt, A.; Becker, H.C.; Ecke, W. Mapping a high oleic acid mutation in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000, 101, 897–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Burow, G.; Chopra, R.; Sattler, S.; Burke, J.; Acosta-Martinez, V.; Xin, Z. Deployment of SNP (CAPS and KASP) markers for allelic discrimination and easy access to functional variants for brown midrib genes Bmr6 and Bmr12 in Sorghum bicolor. Mol. Breed. 2019, 39, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phenotypic expression of mutant yl1 over the entire growth period. (A) The phenotype of NY18 and yl1 in seedling stage; (B) leaf color of NY18 and yl1; (C) the phenotype in budding stage; (D) the color of flower buds in NY18 and yl1; (E) the size of petals; (F) the color and size of siliques.
Figure 1. Phenotypic expression of mutant yl1 over the entire growth period. (A) The phenotype of NY18 and yl1 in seedling stage; (B) leaf color of NY18 and yl1; (C) the phenotype in budding stage; (D) the color of flower buds in NY18 and yl1; (E) the size of petals; (F) the color and size of siliques.
Biomolecules 12 00402 g001
Figure 2. SNP-index and Δ(SNP-index) graphs from the QTL-Seq analysis. SNP-index of (A) Y-pool (homozygous mutant leaves) and (B) G-pool (wild-type leaves); (C) Δ(SNP-index) of Y-pool and G-pool. The BnA03.Chd on chromosome A03 was regarded as the candidate interval, with an α = 0.05 significance level.
Figure 2. SNP-index and Δ(SNP-index) graphs from the QTL-Seq analysis. SNP-index of (A) Y-pool (homozygous mutant leaves) and (B) G-pool (wild-type leaves); (C) Δ(SNP-index) of Y-pool and G-pool. The BnA03.Chd on chromosome A03 was regarded as the candidate interval, with an α = 0.05 significance level.
Biomolecules 12 00402 g002
Figure 3. Fine mapping of the BnA03.Chd gene in (Holly × yl1) F2 population. (A) The BnA03.Chd locus was fine-mapped in a 304.7 kb interval containing 58 genes using 1524 chlorophyll-deficient individuals. (B) The BnaA03G0054400ZS was the final candidate gene and had an SNP (G to A) of the gene. (C) The SNP caused the change of glutamic acid at 1349th position to lysine.
Figure 3. Fine mapping of the BnA03.Chd gene in (Holly × yl1) F2 population. (A) The BnA03.Chd locus was fine-mapped in a 304.7 kb interval containing 58 genes using 1524 chlorophyll-deficient individuals. (B) The BnaA03G0054400ZS was the final candidate gene and had an SNP (G to A) of the gene. (C) The SNP caused the change of glutamic acid at 1349th position to lysine.
Biomolecules 12 00402 g003
Figure 4. (A) Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between yl1 and NY18. (B) The expression level of genes involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis pathway. (C) KEGG pathway categories of differentially expressed genes between NY18 and yl1 at leaves from the seedling stage. The size of the point represents the number of genes, and the color of the point represents the degree of enrichment.
Figure 4. (A) Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between yl1 and NY18. (B) The expression level of genes involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis pathway. (C) KEGG pathway categories of differentially expressed genes between NY18 and yl1 at leaves from the seedling stage. The size of the point represents the number of genes, and the color of the point represents the degree of enrichment.
Biomolecules 12 00402 g004
Figure 5. Sequence alignment of the coding sequence of BnaA03G0054400ZS gene between NY18 and yl1. There was a base substitution (G to A) at 4045 bp of the CDS in the fifth exon in yl1.
Figure 5. Sequence alignment of the coding sequence of BnaA03G0054400ZS gene between NY18 and yl1. There was a base substitution (G to A) at 4045 bp of the CDS in the fifth exon in yl1.
Biomolecules 12 00402 g005
Figure 6. The expression level of BnaA03G0054400ZS in leaves, stems, pods, and flower buds of NY18 and yl1, as determined by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). The values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). The statistical analyses in this study were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test.
Figure 6. The expression level of BnaA03G0054400ZS in leaves, stems, pods, and flower buds of NY18 and yl1, as determined by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). The values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). The statistical analyses in this study were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test.
Biomolecules 12 00402 g006
Figure 7. Genotyping results using marker BnaYL1 in (A) (ZS11 × yl1) F2 and (B) (NY18 × yl1) F2 segregation populations. The blue dot represents homozygous alleles derived from parent lines with normal chlorophyll content, the green dot represents homozygous alleles derived from parent line “yl1” with low chlorophyll content, and the red dot represents heterozygous loci. The grey dot represents negative control.
Figure 7. Genotyping results using marker BnaYL1 in (A) (ZS11 × yl1) F2 and (B) (NY18 × yl1) F2 segregation populations. The blue dot represents homozygous alleles derived from parent lines with normal chlorophyll content, the green dot represents homozygous alleles derived from parent line “yl1” with low chlorophyll content, and the red dot represents heterozygous loci. The grey dot represents negative control.
Biomolecules 12 00402 g007
Table 1. The primer sequences used in this study. During the qRT-PCR experiment, primer 1 was used to amplify the target gene, and primer 2 was the primer of the reference gene. Primer 3 was used to clone the cDNA of NY18 and yl1. Primer 4 was the primer sequence of functional marker BnaYL1.
Table 1. The primer sequences used in this study. During the qRT-PCR experiment, primer 1 was used to amplify the target gene, and primer 2 was the primer of the reference gene. Primer 3 was used to clone the cDNA of NY18 and yl1. Primer 4 was the primer sequence of functional marker BnaYL1.
No.Forward Primer Sequence (5′–3′)Reverse Primer Sequence (5′–3′)Purpose
1GATCGCGCTTGTGCTTTGGGTCGGCCTTCCAAGCTCCTCTqRT-PCR
2CAGGAATCGCTGACCGTATTCTCCCTTTGAAATCCACAT
3ATGGCTTCACTTATGTATTCACCCTATCGATCGATCCCTTCAACloning cDNA
4GAAGGTGACCAAGTTCATGCTGGAAGATGATCCAGACTTTCTTGGCCTTCAATCTTGTCTTCAACCTGGMolecular marker
GAAGGTCGGAGTCAACGGATTAGGAAGATGATCCAGACTTTCTTGA
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pang, C.; Zhang, W.; Peng, M.; Zhao, X.; Shi, R.; Wu, X.; Chen, F.; Sun, C.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J. Fine Mapping and Characterization of a Major Gene Responsible for Chlorophyll Biosynthesis in Brassica napus L. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12030402

AMA Style

Pang C, Zhang W, Peng M, Zhao X, Shi R, Wu X, Chen F, Sun C, Wang X, Zhang J. Fine Mapping and Characterization of a Major Gene Responsible for Chlorophyll Biosynthesis in Brassica napus L. Biomolecules. 2022; 12(3):402. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12030402

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pang, Chengke, Wei Zhang, Menlu Peng, Xiaozhen Zhao, Rui Shi, Xu Wu, Feng Chen, Chengming Sun, Xiaodong Wang, and Jiefu Zhang. 2022. "Fine Mapping and Characterization of a Major Gene Responsible for Chlorophyll Biosynthesis in Brassica napus L." Biomolecules 12, no. 3: 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12030402

APA Style

Pang, C., Zhang, W., Peng, M., Zhao, X., Shi, R., Wu, X., Chen, F., Sun, C., Wang, X., & Zhang, J. (2022). Fine Mapping and Characterization of a Major Gene Responsible for Chlorophyll Biosynthesis in Brassica napus L. Biomolecules, 12(3), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12030402

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop