1. Introduction
Over the past decades, dental tissues have become an attractive source of adult human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) were first identified by Gronthos in 2000 [
1], and since then an increasing amount of research has pointed out the broad spectrum of multipotency capacity and potential applicability that DPSCs have in treating numerous disorders, such as endocrine disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, spinal injury, and peripheral nerve injury, and in repairing and regenerating bones and cartilage [
2]. Easy harvesting from extracted teeth together with a wide range of multilineage differentiation capacity makes these stem cells a suitable alternative for adult mesenchymal stem cells isolated from bone marrow. Importantly, DPSCs appear to retain their proliferation capacity, phenotype, and multipotency after cryogenic storage at sub-zero temperatures [
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8], which is a key aspect in their long-term preservation.
In this rapidly growing field, a vast number of freezing protocols have been tested for the cryopreservation of DPSCs. Cryopreservation and freezing conditions represent an insult to stem cell metabolism. It is essential to implement protocols that minimize potential cell cryoinjuries and facilitate a high rate of stem cell post-thaw recovery. In general, cryopreservation, namely for cell therapy, brings a lot of pitfalls, including cooling rate, the use of animal-derived culture medium additives, and the potential cytotoxicity of cryoprotective agents (CPAs). Only through assessment of these challenges and implementation of standardized good manufacturing practices (GMP) will stem cell treatment options improve. When cells are cooled too slowly, they dehydrate and shrink due to osmotic stress, whereas rapid cooling results in intracellular ice formation [
9,
10,
11]. Cell membranes were identified by Rowe [
12] as one of the key targets for freezing injury. Besides carefully controlling the optimal cooling rates, the medium can also be supplemented with CPAs in order to minimize cryoinjury.
In general, CPAs can be divided into two different groups: low- and high-molecular-weight CPAs [
11,
13]. The low-molecular-weight CPAs include dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), glycerol, and ethylene (propylene) glycerol. These CPAs can penetrate the cell cytoplasmic membrane, preventing ice crystal nuclei formation and slowing down the rate of ice crystal growth inside cells [
9,
14]. The ability of CPAs to form hydrogen bonds with water was proposed as a strong correlate with their protective ability [
15]. However, their concentrations must stay below the threshold for cell toxicity [
15]. The second group, high-molecular-weight CPAs (HMW-CPAs), includes dextran, hydroxyethyl starch, polyvinylpyrrolidone, and polyvinyl alcohol. These HMW-CPAs remain in the extracellular space and participate in cell dehydration; thus minimizing intracellular ice crystal formation and helping in membrane stabilization [
11].
The most versatile and commonly used CPA is DMSO at a concentration of 10%. Woods et al. reported that 7.8–11.6% DMSO was optimal for DPSCs cooled at −1 °C/min in an isopropanol bath of up to −85 °C for 24 h followed by storage in liquid nitrogen [
8]. Despite the widespread use of DMSO, there are also concerns about its potential cytotoxic effect. DMSO-preserved bone marrow cells have been shown to cause adverse effects after their transplantation [
16,
17]. Moreover, DMSO-related influence on gene expression of gene methylation machinery was observed and thus represents a major obstacle of DMSO usage in, e.g., alternative stem cell sources [
18]. Therefore, many research strategies have been exploring ways to reduce cryoprotectant toxicity and at the same time minimize stem cell cryoinjuries. Hoping to lower or even completely remove DMSO from the freezing solutions, several other compounds have been investigated. Given the multiplicity of actions of CPAs and the need to mitigate toxicity, it was hypothesized that combinations of CPAs might be more effective [
15]. CPA combinations were developed by mixing both permeating and non-permeating CPAs, a philosophy that has been successfully used in many CPA protocols [
15]. The aim is to find a balance between extracellular and intracellular cell protection during freezing conditions and thereby gain a high number of functional and vital stem cells after thawing.
In many recent studies, these combinations have allowed DMSO concentrations to be lowered to 5% while maintaining rates of stem cell cryopreservation comparable to 10% DMSO concentrations [
11,
19,
20]. However, freezing media containing CPAs in combination with DMSO concentrations of less than 2% have resulted in lower effectivity rates in post-thawing functional stem cells [
21]. Using a freezing protocol involving a magnetic field, DPSCs can be frozen in a serum-free freezing solution containing only 3% DMSO [
22]. However, cryopreservation protocols involving the magnetic field are technically and financially demanding. We had already verified that the less technically and financially demanding technique, i.e., uncontrolled-rate freezing, is effective in the cryopreservation of DPSCs [
3]. Therefore, we focused this study on lowering the DMSO concentration by mixing it with a non-penetrating CPA. Hyaluronic acid (HA) is an acidic, non-sulfated glycosaminoglycan with a repeating disaccharide structure of d-glucuronic acid and N-acetyl-d-glucosamine [
23]. It is one of the main components of the extracellular matrix, and in high molecular form, it is part of the cell’s native environment. Furthermore, the chemical and bioactive properties of HA, such as the ability to bind water molecules or form a framework, provide properties that can be beneficial during stem cell cryopreservation.
The first research question was whether HMW-HA (>1.0 MDa) can be used as a cryoprotectant when preserving DPSCs in order to reduce the concentration of DMSO in the cryopreservation medium. We then sought to identify the optimal combination of HMW-HA and reduced-dose DMSO. Several studies had already identified HA as a non-toxic material that does not negatively affect the viability, proliferation activity, or differentiation potential of DPSCs [
24,
25]. The second question was whether DPSCs stored using the combination of HMW-HA and reduced-dose DMSO could withstand freezing conditions and maintain their stemness markers and multipotency capacity after thawing. Finally, we wanted to verify whether the innovative approach in the cryogenic freezing medium can be used in cryostorage of stem cells other than dental pulp stem cells.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. hMSC Lineages
All human DPSC lineages used in this study had been previously isolated and characterized according to their phenotype and differentiation potential. Results had already been published in our previous study [
3]. Briefly, permanent tooth extraction occurred at the Dental Clinic of the University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. Patients or their legally authorized representatives voluntarily signed written informed consent before being involved in the study. The Ethical Committee in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic, approved the guidelines for this study (ref. no. 201812 S07P). We isolated DPSCs by means of an enzymatic isolation technique using a 0.05% trypsin/EDTA solution (Gibco, London, UK).
Adipose-derived stem cells (hADSCs) were isolated from the stromal vascular fraction of lipoaspirate after an aesthetic liposuction surgery at CHS Galen, v.o.s.; Usti and Orlici; Czech Republic. All donors voluntarily signed written informed consent for the discarded material to be used for cell harvesting before being involved in the study. We isolated ADSCs using stromal tissue Collagenase I enzymatic digestion (0.3 U/mL (Wünsch units) as it was published earlier [
26] with minor modifications.
2.2. hMSC Characterization
We used five independent human lineages of DPSCs cryopreserved in the 4th passage; for the cryopreservation process, we used uncontrolled-rate freezing and dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich—Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) at a concentration of 10%. The DPSCs were stored at −80 °C. At the beginning of the study, we thawed lineages using a 37 °C thermal bath. Thawed DPSCs were seeded on an adherent tissue culture dish (TPP, Sigma-Aldrich) and cultivated in a modified cultivation medium (α-MEM, Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Foster City, CA, USA) for mesenchymal adult progenitor cells, containing 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS, PAA Laboratories, Dartmouth, MA, USA) and supplemented with 10 ng/mL epidermal growth factor (PeproTech, London, UK), 10 ng/mL platelet-derived growth factor (PeproTech), 50 nM dexamethasone (Bieffe Medital, Grosotto, Italy), 0.2 mM L-ascorbic acid (Bieffe Medital), 2% glutamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin (Invitrogen), 20 μg/mL gentamicin (Invitrogen), and 2.5 µg/mL amphotericin (Sigma-Aldrich). The medium was also enriched with 10 μL/mL Insulin-Transferrin-Selenium-Sodium supplement (ITS, Bieffe Medital) to increase nutrient utilization. We incubated adherent tissue culture dishes (TPP, Sigma-Aldrich) with stem cells at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 14 days to eliminate the effect of DMSO on previously stored cells that used DMSO as the CPA. We changed the cultivation medium every three days and passaged them once during this period, which was approximately after one week. Then, we reseeded stem cells in a concentration of 5000 cells per cm2 of an adherent tissue culture dish and cultivated them for another week. After 14 days, we measured the total cell count using a Z2-Counter (Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL, USA) and assessed the cell viability using a trypan dye exclusion method along with a Vi-Cell analyzer (Beckman Coulter).
Five independent hADSC lines were characterized according to their hMSC phenotype (CD73+; CD90+; CD105+/CD14−; CD19−; CD34−; CD45−) (MSC Phenotyping Kit; Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, NRW, Germany) on flow cytometry (Novocyte 3000; ACEA Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) and sub-cultivated in DMEM (Biosera, Nuaille, France) supplemented with 10% FBS (Diagnovum, Ebsdorfergrund, Germany), 2 mM L-Glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich—Merck), 4.5 mg/mL D-Glucose (Sigma-Aldrich—Merck), 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin (Biosera) complete medium up to 4th passage prior cryopreservation experiments. For the ADSCs cell count and viability assessment electronic pulse area analysis and electronic current exclusion/pulse-field analysis were performed (CaSy cell counter, OMNI Life Science GmbH, Bremen, Germany).
2.3. Cryopreservation Protocol
Before cryopreservation, DPSCs/ADSCs of each lineage were divided into seven aliquots containing 0.5 × 10
6 cells according to the CPA/s supplemented in the cryopreservation media (
Table 1).
The cryovials containing a pharmacological grade high-molecular-weight HA were distributed and preprepared by the company Contipro a.s., Dolni Dobrouc, Czech Republic (
Figure 1).
First, we filled the experiment cryovials containing the HMW-HA with 0.5 mL of the modified cultivation media for mesenchymal adult progenitor cells minus the volume of cell aliquots containing 0.5 × 106 cells submerged in the modified cultivation media. This was undertaken to dissolve any HMW-HA present before we placed the cells in each cryovial. Subsequently, we added the cell samples and 0.5 mL of precooled 4 °C cryopreservation medium composed of DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich—Merck KGaA) and FBS (PAA Laboratories) according to final concentrations of DMSO in the experiment groups, namely 5%, and 3%. In the control groups, we followed the same cryopreservation protocols but without the HMW-HA.
Afterward, we stored each cryovial using uncontrolled-rate freezing. The cryovials were placed at a temperature of −20 °C and kept for 1–1.5 h. Then, they were placed directly in the freezer and stored at −80 °C for one week.
2.4. hMSC Revival
After the one-week storage, each cryovial was thawed using a 37 °C thermal bath. The cells were mixed in a tube with an inactivation medium (α-MEM and FBS at a concentration of 20% for DPSCs; DMEM complete medium for ADSCs) to inactivate the cryopreservation medium and cryoprotectant/s. The tube was then centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 min (600× g).
2.5. Effect of Cryopreservation on DPSC Viability, Enumeration, and Cell Proliferation Activity
We measured the total cell count and viability in all groups after cryopreservation. We counted the total cell number using the Z2-Counter (Beckman Coulter), evaluated the viability using the trypan dye exclusion method along with a Vi-Cell analyzer (Beckman Coulter). Proliferation activity was determined as population doublings (PDs) and population doubling time (PDT). We used the formula PD = log2 (Nx/N1) to calculate the population doublings. Nx is the total cell count calculated using the Z2-Counter upon cell cultivation, and N1 is the initial count of cryopreserved cells after thawing. To calculate the population doubling time, we used the formula PDT = t/n, where t is the number of hours of cultivation upon cell thawing, and n is the number of PDs, calculated as described above.
2.6. Effect of Cryopreservation on Phenotype Profile
The phenotype analysis was performed by first detaching adherent stem cells using the 0.05% trypsin-EDTA solution (Gibco) and then staining them with primary immunofluorescence antibodies conjugated with phycoerythrin (PE) or fluorescein (FITC). Positive cells were determined as the percentage with a fluorescence intensity greater than 99.5% of the negative isotype immunoglobulin control. We analyzed the following CD markers: CD29 (TS2/16, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD31 (MBC 78.2, Invitrogen), CD34 (581 (Class 287 III, Invitrogen), CD44 (MEM 85, Invitrogen), CD45 (HI30, Invitrogen), CD49f (GoH3, Invitrogen), CD73 (AD2, BD Biosciences Pharmingen/Miltenyi Biotec), CD90 (F15-42-1-5, Beckman Coulter/Miltenyi Biotec).
2.7. Effect of Cryopreservation on Multipotency Capacity
For osteogenic differentiation, 70–100% confluent DPSCs were exposed to the Differentiation of Basal Medium-Osteogenic (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) for three weeks. The differentiation medium was changed every third day of cultivation. At the end of the duration, induced cultures were evaluated for osteogenic differentiation using immunohistochemistry and histological staining. Osteogenic cultures were fixed using 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin, and cut in 7 µm sections. After deparaffinization, the sections were stained using von Kossa staining in order to expose calcium phosphate deposits (brown or black spots) and processed for anti-osteocalcin immunohistochemistry (rusty areas). Osteocalcin is one of the main proteins of the osteogenic extracellular matrix. For immunohistochemistry, sections were incubated with a primary antibody, a primary mouse IgG antibody (1:50, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), and a donkey anti-mouse secondary IgG antibody (1:250, Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, West Grove, PA, USA). Chondrogenesis was initiated in 70–100% confluent DPSCs. Passaged DPSCs were trypsinized and resuspended in the Differentiation Basal Medium-Chondrogenic (Lonza); then supplemented with 50 ng/mL TGF-β1 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) for three weeks. The chondrogenic medium was replenished twice a week. After three weeks, cultures were prepared for immunohistochemistry and histological staining in the same way as the osteogenic samples. Afterward, the sections were assessed with anti-type II collagen antibodies. Slices were incubated with a primary mouse IgM antibody (1:500, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) and Cy3TM-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary IgM antibody. Cell nuclei were counterstained with 4′-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Sigma-Aldrich). Besides the immunocytochemistry, the chondrogenic sections were stained with Alcian blue (for 30 min in 1% Alcian blue solution in 3% acetic acid) and Trichrome staining (modified according to Masson).
Due to the fact that even non-cryopreserved DPSC lineages differentiated into adipogenic cell lines unwillingly in our previous study [
3], we did not induce adipogenesis in these DPSC groups.
2.8. Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software GraphPad Prism 6 (San Diego, CA, USA). The data are presented as the mean ± SD. The statistical significances (* p < 0.05) were calculated using either one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test for continuous variables, or Friedman’s test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test on ranks for nonparametric variables. The Shapiro–Wilk test or Kolmogorov–Smirnov test were used for normal distribution evaluations.
4. Discussion
Cryopreservation represents an efficient method for preserving and pooling mesenchymal stem cells to obtain the cell counts required for regenerative or reparative therapies and facilitate its off-the-shelf use. Due to risks connected with long-term stem cell cultivation, such as contamination, genetic drifts, or epigenetic changes, it is necessary to store stem cells in unaltered form, if possible. Equally, during cryopreservation, it is important to preserve MSC functional properties such as immunomodulatory properties and multilineage differentiation ability.
However, cryopreservation also involves issues related to the higher risk of freeze injury and subsequent cell death due to the formation of intra- or extracellular ice crystals and the increase in solutes when cell suspension is cooled below the freezing point. In order to address this issue, CPAs are necessary to minimize or prevent the damage associated with the freezing process. The mechanisms of protection are not exactly understood. However, CPAs work primarily to alter the physical conditions of both ice and the solutions surrounding cells or the intracellular environment. To provide optimal protection, different CPAs have been identified [
11,
14,
27]. Optimization of the use of CPA is one of the remaining challenges to be addressed in order to preserve MSCs effectively.
DMSO with a concentration of 10% combined with FBS is often used to preserve MSCs [
8,
14,
28,
29]. Thanks to its low molecular weight, DMSO can penetrate cells, depress the freezing point, and form extensive hydrogen bonds with water molecules; thus potentially altering the water-to-ice transition [
29,
30,
31]. Despite its cryoprotective advantages, DMSO is not completely inert, and its cytotoxic effect increases with temperature, concentration, and exposure time [
32]. Concerns over the negative effect of DMSO may be alleviated by lowering the dose of DMSO (from 10% to 5% [
21] or 3.5% [
33]), washing cells to remove DMSO before their application [
34], or usage of a magnetic field during cryopreservation [
22]. However, the decrement of DMSO content via expensive and laborious physical processes represents an important disadvantage for research or clinical laboratory application. The introduction of non-penetrating CPAs into the cryogenic media might be also one of the mechanisms to reduce the concentration of DMSO. High-molecular weight CPAs cannot cross the cell membrane but can protect the cells from rupture by forming a viscous glassy shell around the outer surface of the cells [
35]. However, such CPAs are less efficient than DMSO in terms of maintaining the survival rate of revived stem cells. Therefore, they are mainly supplemented in the cryopreservation medium in order to lower the dose of DMSO. The optimal concentration of these cryoprotective agent “cocktails” as an alternative to DMSO alone has to be determined experimentally for each cell type.
According to the results, we demonstrated that the HMW-HA (>1.0 MDa) can be used as a cryoprotectant in the cryopreservation of DPSCs; thus reducing the concentration of DMSO. HA is the most versatile macromolecule present in the connective tissues of all vertebrates. With its excellent physicochemical properties (such as biodegradability, biocompatibility, nontoxicity, and no immunogenicity), hyaluronic acid has a wide range of applications and serves as an excellent tool in biomedical applications [
36]. It is also a powerful antioxidant [
37] and is best known for its ability to bond to water [
36,
38]. Therefore, our hypothesis was that oxidative damage and ice crystal formation during cryopreservation may be reduced by adding HA in the freezing medium. Other authors had already demonstrated, for example, that the quality of post-thaw sperm was higher when HA was added to freezing media [
39].
We tested 0.1% and 0.2% HMW-HA in combination with reduced concentrations of DMSO (5% and 3%). hMSCs stored using 10%, 5%, and 3% DMSO served as control. DMSO concentrations below 2% were reposted as ineffective in the protection of cryopreserved stem cells [
21]. Samples cryopreserved with supplementation of HMW-HA had increased proliferation after one or two weeks of cultivation in comparison with controls cryopreserved without HMW-HA, and cell viability was almost equal during subsequent cultivation independent of the CPA used during cryopreservation. The observed effect on cell survival and proliferation was universal among different hMSC sources, both DPSCs and ADSCs cryopreserved with supplementation of HMW-HA exceeded its controls. The increase in total cell count corresponded to the elevated expression of CD49f in samples cryopreserved with HMW-HA supplementation. Besides these biological markers for mesenchymal stem cells, other cell-surface proteins, including integrin α6, CD49f, have been used to characterize MSCs [
40]. CD49f belongs to the group of type I integrins (transmembrane glycoproteins) that play a role in cell adhesion and signaling. Their activation affects signal transduction, cell differentiation, proliferation, cell shape, and survival [
41]. Integrin α6 is also involved in maintaining stem cell self-renewal potential [
41] and therefore can be considered a “stemness” marker. Moreover, none of the cryomedium compositions negatively affected the differential potential of DPSCs into chondrogenic and osteogenic cell lineages. Thus, chondrogenesis and osteogenesis DPSCs differentiation has been observed independently of the CPA used during cryopreservation. We did not induce adipogenesis in any group of cells since in our previous study we were not able to induce even non-cryopreserved cells to differentiate into adipocytes [
3]. These results correspond with outcomes published by Gronthos. He concluded that DPSCs generally differentiate in adipocytes unwillingly [
1].
To sum all up, in samples cryopreserved with the combination of 3% DMSO + 0.1% HMW-HA, we observed a high post-thaw recovery of MSCs in subsequent cultivation. MSCs stored using this cryopreservation medium highly proliferated, kept the high viability, demonstrated an immunoprofile of mesenchymal stem cells with the highest increase level of CD49f, and have unchanged differentiation capacity. Furthermore, this CPA “cocktail” contains the lowest dose of DMSO and minimal HA supplementation.
The hyaluronic acid of biotechnology origin represents an effective animal component-free cryoprotective compound. That is advantageous for producing the potential ready-to-use product used as CPA in cryopreservation of mesenchymal stem cells for clinical use of MSCs in human medicine. Utilization of a pharmacological grade high-molecular-weight HA in cryopreservation of stem cells can be an example of a process that falls within the concept of biotechnology. Today, biotechnology covers many different disciplines and belongs to rapidly growing fields. New technologies and products are developed every year. We will be more than satisfied if our results will participate in producing the new product and help to decrease the DMSO concentration in the cryogenic medium for mesenchymal stem cells.