Next Article in Journal
Computational Approaches to the Rational Design of Tubulin-Targeting Agents
Previous Article in Journal
Bioinformatic Analyses of Peripheral Blood Transcriptome Identify Altered Neutrophil-Related Pathway and Different Transcriptomic Profiles for Acute Pancreatitis in Patients with and without Chylomicronemia Syndrome
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/biom13020283
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Conserved Transcriptional Activation Activity Identified in Dual-Specificity Tyrosine-(Y)-Phosphorylation-Regulated Kinase 1

by
Xiuke Ouyang
1,
Zhuqing Wang
1,
Bingtong Wu
1,
Xiuxia Yang
1 and
Bo Dong
1,2,3,*
1
Fang Zongxi Center, MoE Key Laboratory of Marine Genetics and Breeding, College of Marine Life Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
2
Laoshan Laboratory, Qingdao 266237, China
3
Institute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2023, 13(2), 283; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13020283
Submission received: 18 December 2022 / Revised: 27 January 2023 / Accepted: 30 January 2023 / Published: 2 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Dual-specificity tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1 (DYRK1) encodes a conserved protein kinase that is indispensable to neuron development. However, whether DYRK1 possesses additional functions apart from kinase function remains poorly understood. In this study, we firstly demonstrated that the C-terminal of ascidian Ciona robusta DYRK1 (CrDYRK1) showed transcriptional activation activity independent of its kinase function. The transcriptional activation activity of CrDYRK1 could be autoinhibited by a repression domain in the N-terminal. More excitingly, both activation and repression domains were retained in HsDYRK1A in humans. The genes, activated by the activation domain of HsDYRK1A, are mainly involved in ion transport and neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction. We further found that numerous mutation sites relevant to the DYRK1A-related intellectual disability syndrome locate in the C-terminal of HsDYRK1A. Then, we identified several specific DNA motifs in the transcriptional regulation region of those activated genes. Taken together, we identified a conserved transcription activation domain in DYRK1 in urochordates and vertebrates. The activation is independent of the kinase activity of DYRK1 and can be repressed by its own N-terminal. Transcriptome and mutation data indicate that the transcriptional activation ability of HsDYRK1A is potentially involved in synaptic transmission and neuronal function related to the intellectual disability syndrome.

1. Introduction

Dual specificity tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation-regulated kinase (DYRK), as a protein kinase, plays vital regulatory roles in development and disease [1,2,3,4]. There are five DYRK family members in mammals: DYRK1A, DYRK1B, DYRK2, DYRK3, and DYRK4 [5], among which DYRK1A plays exclusive roles in neurological diseases [1,4,6,7]. DYRK1A has been reported to be constitutively expressed at a high level in the central nervous system (CNS) of Rattus [8]. In chick and mouse embryos, DYRK1A is detected in neuronal progenitors and differentiated neurons [9,10]. DYRK1A distributes in different types of neuronal cells in the human brain [11] and has been found to be associated with neurological diseases, such as Down syndrome (DS), autism, and neurodegenerative diseases [12]. DS is the most common human genetic disorder and the major cause of mental retardation. Most DS patients have typical symptoms, including cognitive defects and memory impairment [1,13]. The main pathogenic factor of DS is the trisomy of chromosome 21, and DYRK1A locates on the DS critical region (DSCR) of chromosome 21. Therefore, the extra copy increases DYRK1A expression level by approximately 1.5-fold in DS brains [6]. Overexpression of DYRK1A has been demonstrated to cause morphological and cognitive defects in mouse DS models [12]. Additionally, it is well known that DS patients present a size-reduced brain [14]. Previous studies showed that DYRK1A regulates brain size in a dose dependent manner in mouse, Xenopus, and Drosophila [15,16,17], indicating that the expression of DYRK1 might be regulated rigidly for maintaining the normal development and function of brain. However, the molecular mechanisms of how DYRK1A regulates the downstream genes remains elusive.
DYRK1 phosphorylates a broad set of proteins involved in diverse cellular processes, such as cell cycle, cell differentiation, and cell apoptosis [18,19,20]. DYRK1A phosphorylates nuclear factor of the activated T-cell (NFAT) to induce its nuclear export [21]. DYRK1 regulates the transcriptional activity of Gli1 by promoting its nucleus localization [22]. DYRK1A prevents the proliferation of embryonic neuronal cells by phosphorylating p53 at Ser15 to enhance p53 transcriptional activity [23]. One finding also indicates that DYRK1A participates in transcriptional regulation. DYRK1A shows transcriptional activation activity that is dependent on kinase activity of itself [24]. DYRK1A could increase Tau mRNA stability in a kinase-independent manner, thereby enhancing the expression level of Tau [25]. These findings suggest that DYRK1 regulates the gene expression through some new mechanisms. Whether DYRK1 possesses an authentic transcription activation domain independent of the kinase domain remains unrevealed.
As a branch of chordate, ascidian Ciona’s genome does not duplicate and remains much ancestral single-copy gene [26,27]. It is a suitable ancestor material for the research of conservation or divergency of gene function. In this study, we identified a DYRK homology CrDRYK1 in Ciona and proved that the C-terminal of CrDYRK1 possessed the transcriptional activation activity that was regulated by the repression domain localizing in the N-terminal. We then demonstrated that the transcriptional activation and repression mechanism were retained in HsDYRK1A but not in HsDYRK1B. Using RNA-seq, we further revealed that the transcriptional activation ability of HsDYRK1A was mainly involved in ion transport and neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction. Taken together, we demonstrated that, apart from kinase activity, CrDYRK1 possessed transcriptional activation activity independent of kinase activity and regulated by the repression domain of itself. The on–off mechanism of transcriptional activation activity was conserved in HsDYRK1A, and the transcriptional activation ability might be responsible for neuronal development and function.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Electroporation

Animals were acquired from the eastern coast of Qingdao (Shandong, China). Mature eggs and sperm were collected and fertilized in seawater at room temperature; dechorionation and electroporation were performed as previously described [28]. After electroporation, dechorionated eggs were washed and cultured at 16 °C.

2.2. Plasmid Constructions

PCR was performed with the Phanta Max Super-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). DNA was purified using a GeneJET Gel Extraction Kit (Thermofisher, Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). All DNA Fragments were ligated by the One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China).
To identify the transcriptional activation activity, the isoform I, isoform II, and truncated isoform I of CrDYRK1 were amplified from C. robusta cDNA separately using PCR and ligated to pGBTK7 (BD) vector (Takara, Beijing, China), respectively. The HsDYRK1A (residues 485–763) and HsDYRK1B (residues 437–629) fragments were amplified separately from human cDNA by PCR and ligated to BD vector for the transcriptional activation activity analysis. The CsDYRK1 (residues 393–626) fragment was amplified from C. savignyi cDNA by PCR and ligated to BD vector for the transcriptional activation activity analysis. The DmMNB (residues 629–1047) fragment was amplified from Drosophila melanogaster cDNA by PCR and ligated to BD vector for the transcriptional activation activity analysis.
In the repression assay, CrNFAT5 (residues 77–979) and CrMyc (residues 1–681) fragments were amplified and ligated to BD vector to serve as a positive control. CrDYRK1 (isoform II) (residues 1–168) fragment was amplified and subcloned into EcoRI restriction sites of the CrNFAT5 (residues 77–979)-BD vector. CrDYRK1 (isoform II) (residues 1–168) and CrMyc (residues 1–681) fragments were amplified separately and ligated to BD vector to construct an expression vector CrDYRK1 (isoform II) (residues 1–168)-CrMyc (residues 1–681)-BD. Truncated versions of CrDYRK1 (isoform II) were amplified separately and ligated to BD vector to construct expression vector CrDYRK1 (isoform II) (residues 43–815)-BD and CrDYRK1 (isoform II) (residues 85–815)-BD. HsDYRK1A-N (1–69) fragment was amplified and subcloned into EcoRI restriction sites of the HsDYRK1A (residues 485–763)-BD vector to construct expression vector HsDYRK1A-N (residues 1–69)-C (residues 485–763)-BD.
In the RNA-seq assay, HsDYRK1A (residues 485–763) fragment was amplified and ligated to pEGFP-N1 vector (Addgene, Watertown, MA, USA). HsDYRK1A-N (1–69)-C (485–763) was amplified from HsDYRK1A-N (residues 1–69)-C (residues 485–763)-BD vector and ligated to pEGFP-N1 vector.
In the assay of subcellular localization observation, the isoform I and isoform II of CrDYRK1 were amplified and ligated to pEGFP-C1 vector driven by Brachyury promoter. HsDYRK1A (residues 485–763) fragment was amplified by PCR and ligated to pEGFP-N1 vector. CsDYRK1 (residues 393–626) and CrDYRK1 (isoform I) (residues 427–647) fragments were amplified by PCR and ligated to pEGFP-N1 vector driven by Epi I promoter, respectively.
All primers are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

2.3. Gene Structure, Phylogenetic Analysis, Domain Analysis

The genomic sequence and coding sequence (CDS) of CrDYRK1 were downloaded from the Ghost Database (http://ghost.zool.kyoto-u.ac.jp/cgi-bin/gb2/gbrowse/kh/) (accessed on 10 October 2019) and used for analyzing gene structure in the GSDS-2.0 (http://gsds.gao-lab.org/) (accessed on 10 October 2019). The amino acids sequence of the DYRK1 from different species were acquired from the NCBI, and the sequences of kinase domains were used to build phylogenetic tree by MEGA-X software. The phylogenetic tree was built using the maximum likelihood method with 1000 bootstraps, and the JTT model was selected. The protein 3D structure was predicted using online tools ALPHAFOLD (https://cosmic-cryoem.org/tools/alphafold/). The conserved domain analysis of DYRK1 was performed by NCBI CD-Search (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi) (accessed on 18 December 2021) and SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/) (accessed on 18 December 2021). To reveal the preference of HsDYRK1A-activating genes, DNA motif analysis was performed using online tool MEME (https://meme-suite.org/meme/doc/meme.html) (accessed on 19 November 2022). The upstream 1000 bp of translation start sites of 96 upregulated genes were obtained for motif analysis.

2.4. Sequence Alignment and Ks Calculation

The alignment of the amino acids sequence from different species was performed by using DNAMAN software. The coding sequence of the DYRK1 from different species were collected from the NCBI. To examine whether these duplicated DYRK1 members diversified, synonymous (Ks) substitution of each duplicated DYRK1 were calculated using KaKs_Calculator 2.0 (KaKs_Calculator2.0 download | SourceForge.net) [29].

2.5. Yeast Two-Hybrid Assay

The vectors of BD and pGADT7 (AD), the Y2H Gold strain, and all reagents for Y2H assay were purchased from Takara. Different combinations of bait with AD empty vectors were co-transformed into the yeast strain Y2H Gold and cultured on synthetic complete medium lacking leucine and tryptophan (–Leu, –Trp). The transcription activation ability was determined by measuring the growth of serial dilutions on synthetic complete medium lacking leucine and tryptophan synthetic supplemented with Aureobasidin A (AbA) for 2 to 3 d.

2.6. Cell Culture, RNA Sequencing, Data Analysis, and MOTIF Enrichment Analysis

HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The plasmids were transfected into cultured cells according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Lipo3000 from Thermofisher).
Sixty hours post-transfection, we extracted the total RNA from HeLa cells overexpressing HsDYRK1A (residues 485–763)-eGFP or HsDYRK1A (residues 1–69, 485–763)-eGFP, respectively. Transcriptome sequencing was performed by the Berry Genomics company. Genes were annotated according to genome Homo sapiens-NCBI-hg19 (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/all/GCF/000/001/405/GCF_000001405.25_GRCh37.p13/GCF_000001405.25_GRCh37.p13_genomic.fna.gz) (accessed on 25 October 2022). EdgeR was used for differential expression analysis. The resulting p-values were adjusted using Benjamini and Hochberg’s approach for controlling the false discovery rate. Genes with log2 (fold change) > 1 and p value < 0.05 were assigned as differentially expressed. GO and KEGG enrichment analysis of differentially expressed gene sets were implemented using the topG (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/topGO.html) (accessed on 9 November 2022) and KOBAS package, respectively.

2.7. Immunostaining and Imaging

The collected embryos were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at room temperature for 2 h and then were washed thrice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1% Triton X-100 (Solarbio, Beijing, China) (PBST) for 20 min each time. To identify the cell boundary, fixed embryos were stained with 1/200 TRITC phalloidin (YEASEN, Shanghai, China) in PBST overnight at 4 °C. Embryos were then washed thrice with PBST and mounted using Vectashield mounting medium with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Vector Laboratories, Newark, CA, USA) to label the cell nucleus.
HeLa cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 1 h at RT. The fixed cells were rinsed thrice with PBST for 10 min each time. To identify the cell boundary, fixed cells were stained with 1/500 TRITC phalloidin in PBST overnight at 4 °C. HeLa cells were then washed thrice with PBST and mounted using Vectashield mounting medium with DAPI to label the cell nucleus.
Images were taken using a Zeiss LSM900 Confocal Microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

3. Results

3.1. Conservation of Kinase Domain in DYRK1 in the Evolution

To better understand the origin and evolution of DYRK1, phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the conserved kinase domain. The results showed that two homologs of DYRK1, DYRK1A and DYRK1B, were found in most vertebrates, such as Danio rerio, Mus musculus, and Homo sapiens. However, only one homolog of DYRK1 was identified in Urochordata ascidian Ciona, suggesting that DYRK1 gene underwent duplication during the evolution (Figure 1A). To identify the functional conservation of DYRK1, we performed the domain analysis and found that the kinase domain was distributed in all DYRK1, indicating the conserved kinase function. In addition, DYRK1A, distinct from DYRK1B, possessed a polyhistidine stretch that is important for nuclear speckles localization [30] (Figure 1B), suggesting the functional difference between DYRK1A and DYRK1B. Alignment of amino acids of kinase domain analysis showed that the sequence identities of DYRK1A proteins were higher than those of DYRK1B proteins (Figure 1C). We further calculated the synonymous substitution rate (Ks) of DYRK1A and DYRK1B based on CrDYRK1 by using KaKs_Calculator 2.0 [29]. The results showed that Ks of DYRK1A was higher than DYRK1B (Figure 1D), suggesting DYRK1A to be the original copy. Collectively, these results suggest that the kinase function of DYRK1 is highly conserved during the evolution, of which DYRK1A might be ancestral copy.

3.2. CrDYRK1 Possesses Transcriptional Activation Ability

There are three isoforms of CrDYRK1 in ascidian C. robusta. Isoform II and isoform III shared same coding sequence, which was 168 coding amino acids longer than isoform I at the N-terminal (Figure 2A). To examine whether CrDYRK1 has a transcriptional activation function, the transcriptional activation activity verification was performed using a yeast assay system. Yeast strain Y2H GOLD contains reporter gene AUR1-C that is the dominant mutant version of AUR1 (aureobasidin resistance) and endows the resistance of Y2H for AbA. The AD and BD vectors contain the encode sequence of leucine (Leu) and tryptophan (Trp), respectively. Then, the coding sequences of isoform I and isoform II were amplified from C. robusta and fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain to generate CrDYRK1 (isoform I)-BD and CrDYRK1 (isoform II)-BD fusion plasmids. The plasmids were co-transformed into the yeast strain Y2H with an AD empty vector, respectively. The transformants were evaluated for their abilities to activate reporter gene AUR1-C transcription. All transformants could grow on the medium lacking leucine and tryptophan, indicating that AD and BD were transformed into Y2H strains. Excitingly, the strains transformed with CrDYRK1 (isoform I) grew on medium supplemented with AbA but not the strains transformed with CrDYRK1 (isoform II) (Figure 2B), suggesting that CrDYRK1 (isoform I) possessed transcriptional activation activity. Furthermore, we constructed different truncated versions of CrDYRK1 (isoform I) to examine the exact activation domain. We found that both fragment (residues 1–87) and fragment (residues 88–426) of CrDYRK1 (isoform I) did not show the transcriptional activation activity, whereas the fragment (residues 427–647) had this activity (Figure 2C). Collectively, these results indicated that CrDYRK1 possessed transcriptional activation ability, and the activation domain located in the C-terminal that was separate from the kinase domain.

3.3. Identification of an Active Repression Domain in CrDYRK1 (Isoform II)

The activation domain was present in both isoform I and isoform II of CrDYRK1. However, only isoform I possessed transcription activation ability. Based on this result, we speculated that CrDYRK1 (isoform II) (residues 1–168) contained a repression domain to inhibit the transcriptional activation activity. To verify this idea, CrDYRK1 (isoform II) (residues 1–168) was fused with two transcription factor CrNFAT5 and CrMyc for function analysis, respectively. The results showed that the transcriptional activation activity of CrNFAT5 or CrMyc was presented; however, their transcriptional activation activities were obviously suppressed after fused with CrDYRK1 (isoform II) (residues 1–168), which indicates that residues 1–168 of CrDYRK1 (isoform II) functioned as a repression domain (Figure 2D,E). Then, the truncated versions were used for exploring key region of the repression domain in CrDYRK1. We found that deletion of residues 1–42 did not affect the suppression effect, while the transcriptional activation activity appeared after deletion of residues 1–84 (Figure 2F), indicating that residues 1–84 of CrDYRK1 are responsible for repression function. Next, protein 3D structure analysis revealed that the repression domain and activation domain of CrDYRK1 (isoform II) did not come into physical contact, which implies that the suppression effect from the repression domain might not rely on the intramolecular physically binding between the repression domain and activation domain (Supplementary Figure S1A). Then, we expressed eGFP-CrDYRK1 (isoform I) and eGFP-CrDYRK1 (isoform II) in Ciona notochord cells driven by the Brachyury promoter. The results showed the different subcellular localization of CrDYRK1 with and without the repression domain. The GFP signal was detected at the nucleus in the isoform I-expressing cells (Supplementary Figure S1B). Meanwhile, the GFP signal was detected at the nucleus, cytoplasm, and cell boundary in the isoform II-expressing cells (Supplementary Figure S1B). Collectively, our results demonstrated the existence of a repression domain in the N-terminal that could inhibit the transcriptional activation activity of the C-terminal in CrDYRK1 (isoform II).

3.4. The Conservation of the Transcriptional Activation Ability in Human DYRK1

To identify the conservation of transcriptional activation, the homologous regions with a CrDYRK1 (isoform I) activation domain (residues 427–647) from different species were amplified and used for function analysis in yeast system, respectively (Supplementary Figure S2). The results showed that human HsDYRK1A (residues 485–763) presented the transcriptional activation activity but HsDYRK1B (residues 437–629) did not. CrDYRK1 (isoform I) (residues 427–647) and another ascidian species C. savignyi CsDYRK1 (residues 393–626) also showed the transcriptional activation activity. However, the homologous region (residues 629–1047) of DYRK1A in Drosophila (also called MNB) did not show the transcriptional activation activity either (Figure 3A). Then, we found that N-terminal (residues 1–68) of HsDYRK1A also contained a repression domain that could inhibit the transcriptional activation activity of the C-terminal (residues 485–763) (Figure 3B). Collectively, the transcriptional activation ability of DYRK1 was conserved in Urochordate and humans, despite the divergency of HsDYRK1B from HsDYRK1A.

3.5. The Function Analysis of HsDYRK1 Transcription Activation Ability

Nuclear localization is a prerequisite for proteins to perform the transcriptional activation function. To observe subcellular localization, the HsDYRK1A (residues 485–763) fused with eGFP was expressed in HeLa cells, and the GFP signal was detected at the nucleus in the HsDYRK1A (residues 485–763)-expressing cells (Supplementary Figure S3). Then, we expressed CsDYRK1 (residues 393–626)-eGFP and CrDYRK1 (isoform I) (residues 427–647)-eGFP in Ciona epidermis cells driven by Epi I promoter. The GFP signal was detected obviously at the nucleus in both the CsDYRK1 (residues 393–626)-expressing cells and CrDYRK1 (isoform I) (residues 427–647)-expressing cells (Supplementary Figure S3). These results indicated that the activation domain of DYRK1 might also localize in cell nucleus despite the absence of two nuclear localization signals of the N-terminal.
To further reveal the functions of the HsDYRK1’s transcriptional activation ability, the RNA-seq assay was applied to identify its downstream genes. The truncated HsDYRK1A with a transcription activity domain from residues 485 to 763 was overexpressed in HeLa cells, and the truncated HsDYRK1A from residues 1 to 68 plus 485 to 763 was overexpressed as the control. Transcriptome assay identified that 235 differential expression genes (DEGs) (fold change >2 or <0.5 and p-value < 0.05) including 105 upregulated genes and 130 downregulated ones (Figure 4A, Supplementary Table S2). Most DEGs were predicted to localize in the plasma membrane and cell periphery using cellular component (CC) analysis (Figure 4B). For those upregulated genes, Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis revealed that they were mainly involved in regulation of ion transport, especially for calcium ions, in the biological process (BP) (Figure 4C), and were enriched in calmodulin binding, motor activity, and sodium ion transmembrane transporter activity in molecular function (MF) (Figure 4D). The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis showed that the upregulated genes were related to neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction and cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction (Figure 4E). Furthermore, the same analysis procedures were applied to the downregulated genes. The results showed that they were mainly implicated in kidney development in BP analysis and enriched in ion antiporter activity in MF analysis (Supplementary Figure S4A,B). The KEGG results showed that they were also mainly related to neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction and cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction (Figure 4F). Some DEGs (such as ANK2, ATP1B2, OPRL1, PDE4B, TTYH1, ENKUR, PNCK, SLC8A2, GRIN3A, GPR83, and GRHR2) involved in ion transport or neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction were highly expressed in the brain (Supplementary Figure S4C,D). Proper ion transport is vital to synaptic transmission and neuronal development [31,32], and the transmission of signal relies on some important receptor proteins in neuron, for example, GRIN3A and GPR83.
We further investigated the correlation between amino acids mutation of the activation domain and human disease in the UniProt database (https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/Q13627/entry). The result showed that there were many mutations locating in the HsDYRK1A activation domain that might be involved in DYRK1A-related intellectual disability syndrome (Figure 5).
Taken together, these results indicated that the transcriptional activation ability of HsDYRK1A was mainly implicated in ion transport and neuroactive ligand–receptor interactions that were crucial for neuronal function performance and potentially related to neuron diseases.

3.6. The Motif Analysis Reveals the Preference of the Activation Domain of HsDYRK1

To investigate the mechanism of transcription activation in HsDYRK1, we performed motif analysis to find out the particular DNA sequences that HsDYRK1 potentially bound to using the online tool MEME (https://meme-suite.org/meme/doc/meme.html). Five most representative motifs were identified from the upstream 1000 bp of translation start site of 96 upregulated genes (Figure 6A). There were 14 promoters that contained all five representative motifs. The adenine-rich motif-1 (RADACTCYRTYTYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWAAARAAAAAW) has a mostly broad distribution up of to 73.95% (71/96). However, the number of motif occurrence was no more than 22 in the remaining four motifs, suggesting the obvious preference of HsDYRK1A (Figure 6B). These enriched motifs were mainly located at the upstream 500–1000 bp of the translation initiation site (Figure 6C). These results suggest that the activation domain of HsDYRK1A prefers to activate genes that contain specific DNA motifs.

4. Discussion

DYRK1A plays vital roles in embryogenesis and organogenesis, which has been implicated in pathogenesis of neuronal diseases [12,16,33]. The kinase domain of DYRK1 is conserved in most of the species and its ability to phosphorylate downstream proteins is essential to DYRK1 functioning [5]. Ciona belongs to the class Ascidiacea, subphylum Urochordata, and phylum Chordata. Urochordates are the invertebrates most closely related to vertebrates [34]. The ascidian Ciona is an important model organism for developmental and evolutionary biology [35]. Given that Ciona has nonwhole genome duplication and remains many ancestral single-copy genes, it is regarded as a suitable ancestral material for studying the conservation or divergency of gene function [26,27]. In this study, we demonstrated that the transcriptional activation ability presented in the C-terminal of Ciona CrDYRK1, which was also retained in human HsDYRK1A. These results suggest that DYRK1 possessed the transcriptional activation ability apart from kinase function, and this ability might be conserved in chordates. Our result is supported by previous results. Previous research demonstrated that the full length DYRK1A shows transcriptional activation activity [24], and that kinase activity is indispensable to DYRK1A transcriptional activation activity [24]. This research, in agreement with our finding, suggested that DYRK1A possesses potential transcriptional activation ability. However, the dependence of transcriptional activation activity on kinase activity remains controversial. Our findings presented that the activation activity of DYRK1A is independent of its kinase function. The activation domain, located in the C-terminal of DYRK1A, individually performed the activation function. In addition, another study showed that full-length DYRK1A is able to enhance the Tau expression by increasing the mRNA stability, and the C-terminal region of DYRK1A plays a vital role in this process [25]. The finding revealed an additional function of DYRK1A that is distinct from our research. It indicates that DYRK1A could regulate gene expression using different approaches, which enriches our understanding of DYRK1A function. The research also demonstrates the importance of the C-terminal region for DYRK1 function [25]. We did not identify a classical DNA binding domain in full-length HsDYRK1A. However, the motif analysis demonstrated that HsDYRK1A had an obvious preference for target genes containing specific DNA motifs. Thus, we speculate that a DNA binding protein might mediate the association of DYRK1A to the specific elements of DNA.
In this study, we found that the full-length CrDYRK1 (isoform I) rather than CrDYRK1 (isoform II) possessed transcriptional activation activity. CrDYRK1 (isoform II) is 168 amino acids longer than CrDYRK1 (isoform I) at the N-terminal. We further demonstrated that N-terminal (residues 1–168) of CrDYRK1 (isoform II) contained a repression domain, which could suppress the transcriptional activation activity. Then, we found that the on–off mechanism of transcriptional activation activity was retained in HsDYRK1A. The on–off mechanisms of transcriptional activation activity also exist in plant transcriptional factors. NAC20, a plant-specific transcription factor, is vital to multicellular processes. NAC20 shows highly transcriptional activation activity in the C-terminal. In the meantime, there is an active repression domain in the N-terminal of NAC20, which can inhibit transcriptional activation activity [36]. This indicates that the regulation pathway of transcriptional activation activity might be conserved in different organisms. In addition, the activation domain of HsDYRK1A is not distributed in all isoforms, suggesting that the HsDYRK1A executes a transcriptional activation function depending on the coordination of differential isoforms. Except for the repression function, the N-terminal of the 168 amino acids seems to also be responsible for the subcellular localization of DYRK1. In this research, the version of DYRK1 with transcriptional activation activity (isoform I) was shown to be enriched in the nucleus. The suppressed version of DYRK1 (isoform II) was mainly distributed in the cytoplasm and cell membrane, apart from the nucleus. The substrates of DYRK1A were distributed in various subcellular structures, including the nucleus, cytoplasm, cytoskeleton, and vesicles [37], which requires DYRK1 to distribute in different compartments of cell for phosphorylating diverse substrates. CrDYRK1 could achieve multiple localization by relying on different isoforms in C. robusta. Previous research also found that the DNA ligase 1 (Dlg1) or APL-like transcription factor has dual localization in mitochondria and the nucleus via alternative splicing, which generates different transcript-coding variant proteins in plants [38,39,40]. These findings suggest that there may be a universal mechanism that allows the encoded proteins of different transcripts from a certain gene to achieve distinct subcellular localization, thus exhibiting their own functions. The nuclear localization of CrDYRK1 (isoform I) is also more conducive to performing the transcriptional activation function, reflecting the precise regulation of function and localization. The N-terminal (residues 1–168) of CrDYRK1 (isoform II) might execute its suppression by changing the distribution of CrDYRK1 from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and cell membrane.
In this study, some of DEGs (for example, ATP1B2, TTYH1, ENKUR, SLC8A1, and SLC8A2), enriched by GO analysis, are highly expressed in the brain and crucial for ion transport [31,41,42,43,44], especially Ca2+ transmembrane transport. The communication between neurons is pivotal to cognition, including learning and memory. The process of synaptic transmission is regulated by ion transport [45]. Ca2+ signaling exists in all types of neurons [45], and the Ca2+ dyshomeostasis disrupts synaptic transmission [46]. DYRK1A-related neurological diseases show some clinical symptoms such as cognitive disorder with learning and memory impairment [1,13]. These symptoms might be caused by blockage of synaptic transmission. In addition, the MF analysis of transcriptome showed that the upregulated genes were enriched in motor activity. A previous finding indicates that the overexpression of DYRK1A caused the motor abnormalities in a murine model of DS [47]. Moreover, many nonsense or missense mutations that occurred in the activation domain of HsDYRK1A are associated with the DYRK1A-related intellectual disability syndrome. These evidences suggest that the transcriptional activation domain is a potential therapeutic target for DYRK1A-related neurological diseases apart from its kinase domain.
The KEGG analysis showed that DEGs were mainly enriched in neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction terms. Some of DEGs, related to neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction, are also highly expressed in the brain (for example, OPRL1, GRIN3A, GPR83, and CRHR2). The result also suggests that the transcriptional activation ability of HsDYRK1A was implicated in neuronal functions. Thus, the roles of HsDYRK1A in neuron development and function could be based on two distinct pathways: one is that HsDYRK1A phosphorylates downstream substrates relying on kinase function; another is that HsDYRK1A promotes gene expression depending on the transcriptional activation activity. Our finding provides novel understanding on the function of DYRK1A and suggests that the transcriptional activation domain is a potential target for the therapy of DYRK1A-related neurological diseases.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biom13020283/s1, Figure S1: The N-terminal (residues, 1–168) enhance the extranuclear localization of CrDYRK1 (isoform II); Figure S2: The full lengths amino acids sequence alignment of DYRK1 from different species; Figure S3: The subcellular localization of activation domain of DYRK1; Figure S4: The bioinformatics analysis of down-regulated genes and the expression level of some DEGs; Table S1: Primers used for vector construction in this study; Table S2: Differential expression genes of transcriptome assay.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.O.; investigation, X.O. and B.W.; bioinformatics analysis: X.O. and Z.W.; writing—original draft preparation, X.O. and B.D.; writing—review and editing X.O., Z.W., X.Y. and B.D.; supervision, B.D.; project administration, B.D.; funding acquisition, B.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC2601302), the Science & Technology Innovation Project of Laoshan Laboratory (No. LSKJ202203002), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 202161016), and the Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong Province, China.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Ocean University of ChinaInstitutional Animal Care and Use Committee (OUC-IACUC) prior to the initiation of the study (Approval number: “2021-0032-0012”, 15 April 2019). All experiments and relevant methods werecarried out in accordance with the approved guidelines and regulations of OUC-IACUC.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Guo Huarong’s laboratory for sharing the HeLa cell lines; Yang Likun for the 3D structure analysis of DYRK1; Han Wentao for the calculation of synonymous substitution rate; He Muchun for sharing vector CrNFAT5 (residues 77–979)-BD.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  1. Roizen, N.J.; Patterson, D. Down’s syndrome. Lancet 2003, 361, 1281–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liu, T.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Ren, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, J. DYRK1A inhibitors for disease therapy: Current status and perspectives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 229, 114062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Guedj, F.; Pereira, P.L.; Najas, S.; Barallobre, M.J.; Chabert, C.; Souchet, B.; Sebrie, C.; Verney, C.; Herault, Y.; Arbones, M.; et al. DYRK1A: A master regulatory protein controlling brain growth. Neurobiol. Dis. 2012, 46, 190–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tejedor, F.J.; Hammerle, B. MNB/DYRK1A as a multiple regulator of neuronal development. FEBS J. 2011, 278, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Aranda, S.; Laguna, A.; de la Luna, S. DYRK family of protein kinases: Evolutionary relationships, biochemical properties, and functional roles. FASEB J. 2011, 25, 449–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dowjat, W.K.; Adayev, T.; Kuchna, I.; Nowicki, K.; Palminiello, S.; Hwang, Y.W.; Wegiel, J. Trisomy-driven overexpression of DYRK1A kinase in the brain of subjects with Down syndrome. Neurosci. Lett. 2007, 413, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Abbassi, R.; Johns, T.G.; Kassiou, M.; Munoz, L. DYRK1A in neurodegeneration and cancer: Molecular basis and clinical implications. Pharmacol. Ther. 2015, 151, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Okui, M.; Ide, T.; Morita, K.; Funakoshi, E.; Ito, F.; Ogita, K.; Yoneda, Y.; Kudoh, J.; Shimizu, N. High-level expression of the Mnb/Dyrk1A gene in brain and heart during rat early development. Genomics 1999, 62, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hämmerle, B.; Vera-Samper, E.; Speicher, S.; Arencibia, R.; Martínez, S.; Tejedor, F. Mnb/Dyrk1A Is Transiently Expressed and Asymmetrically Segregated in Neural Progenitor Cells at the Transition to Neurogenic Divisions. Dev. Biol. 2002, 246, 259–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hammerle, B.; Elizalde, C.; Tejedor, F.J. The spatio-temporal and subcellular expression of the candidate Down syndrome gene Mnb/Dyrk1A in the developing mouse brain suggests distinct sequential roles in neuronal development. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2008, 27, 1061–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wegiel, J.; Kuchna, I.; Nowicki, K.; Frackowiak, J.; Dowjat, K.; Silverman, W.P.; Reisberg, B.; DeLeon, M.; Wisniewski, T.; Adayev, T.; et al. Cell type- and brain structure-specific patterns of distribution of minibrain kinase in human brain. Brain Res. 2004, 1010, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Arbones, M.L.; Thomazeau, A.; Nakano-Kobayashi, A.; Hagiwara, M.; Delabar, J.M. DYRK1A and cognition: A lifelong relationship. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019, 194, 199–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Godfrey, M.; Lee, N.R. Memory profiles in Down syndrome across development: A review of memory abilities through the lifespan. J. Neurodev. Disord. 2018, 10, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hammerle, B.; Carnicero, A.; Elizalde, C.; Ceron, J.; Martinez, S.; Tejedor, F.J. Expression patterns and subcellular localization of the Down syndrome candidate protein MNB/DYRK1A suggest a role in late neuronal differentiation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2003, 17, 2277–2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tejedor, F.; Zhu, X.R.; Kaltenbach, E.; Ackermann, A.; Baumann, A.; Canal, I.; Heisenberg, M.; Fischbach, K.F.; Pongs, O. Minibrain: A new protein kinase family involved in postembryonic neurogenesis in Drosophila. Neuron 1995, 14, 287–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Willsey, H.R.; Xu, Y.; Everitt, A.; Dea, J.; Exner, C.R.T.; Willsey, A.J.; State, M.W.; Harland, R.M. The neurodevelopmental disorder risk gene DYRK1A is required for ciliogenesis and control of brain size in Xenopus embryos. Development 2020, 147, dev189290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fotaki, V.; Dierssen, M.; Alcantara, S.; Martinez, S.; Marti, E.; Casas, C.; Visa, J.; Soriano, E.; Estivill, X.; Arbones, M.L. Dyrk1A haploinsufficiency affects viability and causes developmental delay and abnormal brain morphology in mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22, 6636–6647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yoshida, K. Role for DYRK family kinases on regulation of apoptosis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2008, 76, 1389–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Boni, J.; Rubio-Perez, C.; Lopez-Bigas, N.; Fillat, C.; de la Luna, S. The DYRK Family of Kinases in Cancer: Molecular Functions and Therapeutic Opportunities. Cancers 2020, 12, 2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Becker, W. Emerging role of DYRK family protein kinases as regulators of protein stability in cell cycle control. Cell Cycle 2012, 11, 3389–3394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Arron, J.R.; Winslow, M.M.; Polleri, A.; Chang, C.P.; Wu, H.; Gao, X.; Neilson, J.R.; Chen, L.; Heit, J.J.; Kim, S.K.; et al. NFAT dysregulation by increased dosage of DSCR1 and DYRK1A on chromosome 21. Nature 2006, 441, 595–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mao, J.; Maye, P.; Kogerman, P.; Tejedor, F.J.; Toftgard, R.; Xie, W.; Wu, G.; Wu, D. Regulation of Gli1 transcriptional activity in the nucleus by Dyrk1. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 35156–35161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Park, J.; Oh, Y.; Yoo, L.; Jung, M.S.; Song, W.J.; Lee, S.H.; Seo, H.; Chung, K.C. Dyrk1A phosphorylates p53 and inhibits proliferation of embryonic neuronal cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 31895–31906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Di Vona, C.; Bezdan, D.; Islam, A.B.; Salichs, E.; Lopez-Bigas, N.; Ossowski, S.; de la Luna, S. Chromatin-wide profiling of DYRK1A reveals a role as a gene-specific RNA polymerase II CTD kinase. Mol. Cell. 2015, 57, 506–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Qian, W.; Jin, N.; Shi, J.; Yin, X.; Jin, X.; Wang, S.; Cao, M.; Iqbal, K.; Gong, C.X.; Liu, F. Dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (Dyrk1A) enhances tau expression. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2013, 37, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Holland, L.Z.; Ocampo Daza, D. A new look at an old question: When did the second whole genome duplication occur in vertebrate evolution? Genome Biol. 2018, 19, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Olinski, R.P.; Lundin, L.G.; Hallbook, F. Conserved synteny between the Ciona genome and human paralogons identifies large duplication events in the molecular evolution of the insulin-relaxin gene family. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lu, Q.; Gao, Y.; Fu, Y.; Peng, H.; Shi, W.; Li, B.; Lv, Z.; Feng, X.Q.; Dong, B. Ciona embryonic tail bending is driven by asymmetrical notochord contractility and coordinated by epithelial proliferation. Development 2020, 147, dev185868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, J.; Yu, J. KaKs_Calculator 2.0: A Toolkit Incorporating Gamma-Series Methods and Sliding Window Strategies. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2010, 8, 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alvarez, M.; Estivill, X.; de la Luna, S. DYRK1A accumulates in splicing speckles through a novel targeting signal and induces speckle disassembly. J. Cell. Sci. 2003, 116(Pt. 15), 3099–3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Brini, M.; Cali, T.; Ottolini, D.; Carafoli, E. Neuronal calcium signaling: Function and dysfunction. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2014, 71, 2787–2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Andang, M.; Lendahl, U. Ion fluxes and neurotransmitters signaling in neural development. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2008, 18, 232–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Blackburn, A.T.M.; Bekheirnia, N.; Uma, V.C.; Corkins, M.E.; Xu, Y.; Rosenfeld, J.A.; Bainbridge, M.N.; Yang, Y.; Liu, P.; Madan-Khetarpal, S.; et al. DYRK1A-related intellectual disability: A syndrome associated with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Genet. Med. 2019, 21, 2755–2764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Delsuc, F.; Brinkmann, H.; Chourrout, D.; Philippe, H. Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives of vertebrates. Nature 2006, 439, 965–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, L.P.; Xiang, J.H.; Dong, B.; Natarajan, P.; Yu, K.J.; Cai, N.E. Ciona intestinalis as an emerging model organism: Its regeneration under controlled conditions and methodology for egg dechorionation. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2006, 7, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hao, Y.J.; Song, Q.X.; Chen, H.W.; Zou, H.F.; Wei, W.; Kang, X.S.; Ma, B.; Zhang, W.K.; Zhang, J.S.; Chen, S.Y. Plant NAC-type transcription factor proteins contain a NARD domain for repression of transcriptional activation. Planta 2010, 232, 1033–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kaczmarski, W.; Barua, M.; Mazur-Kolecka, B.; Frackowiak, J.; Dowjat, W.; Mehta, P.; Bolton, D.; Hwang, Y.W.; Rabe, A.; Albertini, G.; et al. Intracellular distribution of differentially phosphorylated dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A). J. Neurosci. Res. 2014, 92, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Duchene, A.M.; Giege, P. Dual localized mitochondrial and nuclear proteins as gene expression regulators in plants? Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Carrie, C.; Kuhn, K.; Murcha, M.W.; Duncan, O.; Small, I.D.; O’Toole, N.; Whelan, J. Approaches to defining dual-targeted proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009, 57, 1128–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sunderland, P.A.; West, C.E.; Waterworth, W.M.; Bray, C.M. An evolutionarily conserved translation initiation mechanism regulates nuclear or mitochondrial targeting of DNA ligase 1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2006, 47, 356–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Skou, J.C.; Esmann, M. The Na,K-ATPase. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 1992, 24, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Blanco, G.; Mercer, R.W. Isozymes of the Na-K-ATPase: Heterogeneity in structure, diversity in function. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 1998, 275, F633–F650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kumada, T.; Yamanaka, Y.; Kitano, A.; Shibata, M.; Awaya, T.; Kato, T.; Okawa, K.; Abe, T.; Oshima, N.; Nakahata, T.; et al. Ttyh1, a Ca (2+)-binding protein localized to the endoplasmic reticulum, is required for early embryonic development. Dev. Dyn. 2010, 239, 2233–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sutton, K.A.; Jungnickel, M.K.; Wang, Y.; Cullen, K.; Lambert, S.; Florman, H.M. Enkurin is a novel calmodulin and TRPC channel binding protein in sperm. Dev. Biol. 2004, 274, 426–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Grienberger, C.; Konnerth, A. Imaging calcium in neurons. Neuron 2012, 73, 862–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pchitskaya, E.; Popugaeva, E.; Bezprozvanny, I. Calcium signaling and molecular mechanisms underlying neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Calcium 2018, 70, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Altafaj, X.; Dierssen, M.; Baamonde, C.; Martí, E.; Visa, J.; Guimerà, J.; Oset, M.; González, J.R.; Flórez, J.; Fillat, C.; et al. Neurodevelopmental delay, motor abnormalities and cognitive deficits in transgenic mice overexpressing Dyrk1A (minibrain), a murine model of Down’s syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001, 10, 1915–1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Biomolecules 13 00283 g001 550
Figure 1. The protein kinase DYRK1 underwent gene duplication during evolution. (A) The phylogenetic tree analysis of DYRK1 from different species. A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on conserved kinase domain. There was a copy of CrDYRK1 in Ciona and two copies, DYRK1A and DYRK1B, in most vertebrates. (B) The domain analysis of DYRK1. DYRK1 contained a highly conserved kinase domain (yellow) and two nuclear localization signals (red). A polyhistidine stretch (green) was only identified in DYRK1A. (C) The analysis of amino acid sequence identity. The amino acid sequence alignment was performed using the conserved kinase domain. The amino acid sequence identity of DYRK1A was higher than DYRK1B. (D) The synonymous substitution rate (Ks) of DYRK1. The Ks of DYRK1A and DYRK1B was calculated based on C. robusta CrDYRK1. The result showed that synonymous substitution rate (Ks) of DYRK1A was higher than that of DYRK1B.
Figure 1. The protein kinase DYRK1 underwent gene duplication during evolution. (A) The phylogenetic tree analysis of DYRK1 from different species. A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on conserved kinase domain. There was a copy of CrDYRK1 in Ciona and two copies, DYRK1A and DYRK1B, in most vertebrates. (B) The domain analysis of DYRK1. DYRK1 contained a highly conserved kinase domain (yellow) and two nuclear localization signals (red). A polyhistidine stretch (green) was only identified in DYRK1A. (C) The analysis of amino acid sequence identity. The amino acid sequence alignment was performed using the conserved kinase domain. The amino acid sequence identity of DYRK1A was higher than DYRK1B. (D) The synonymous substitution rate (Ks) of DYRK1. The Ks of DYRK1A and DYRK1B was calculated based on C. robusta CrDYRK1. The result showed that synonymous substitution rate (Ks) of DYRK1A was higher than that of DYRK1B.
Biomolecules 13 00283 g001
Biomolecules 13 00283 g002 550
Figure 2. CrDYRK1 possessed an activation domain in C-terminal and a repression domain in N-terminal. (A) Schematic representation of different isoforms of CrDYRK1. The black box, grey box, and black line represent exon, untranslated regions (UTR), and intron, respectively. (B) CrDYRK1 possessed transcriptional activation activity. Isoform I and isoform II of CrDYRK1 were amplified from C. robusta and subcloned into BD vector with AD empty vector co-transformed into yeast strain Y2H, separately. Strain transformed with CrDYRK1 (isoform I) grew on medium supplemented with AbA (0.125 mg/L) and X-α-gal (40 mg/L). X-α-gal is another indicator of Y2H system. (C) The activation domain located in C-terminal of CrDYRK1. The truncate versions of CrDYRK1 (isoform I) were subcloned into BD vector for identifying the activation domain. The truncated CrDYRK1 (isoform I) (residues 427–647) showed transcriptional activation ability. And the activation activity was independent of kinase activity. (D,E) CrDYRK1 (isoform II) contained a repression domain in N-terminal (residues 1–168). CrDYRK1 (isoform II) (residues 1–168) was separately fused with two transcription factors, CrNFAT5 and CrMyc, for function analysis. The transcriptional activation activity of CrNFAT5 or CrMyc was obviously suppressed. (F) The residues 1–84 of CrDYRK1 (isoform II) are responsible for repression function. These truncated versions were used for exploring key region of CrDYRK1 repression domain, and the transcriptional activation activity appeared when deleting residues 1–84 of CrDYRK1 (isoform II). Left panel represent the vector construction and right panel indicate the yeast assay results in (B–F).
Figure 2. CrDYRK1 possessed an activation domain in C-terminal and a repression domain in N-terminal. (A) Schematic representation of different isoforms of CrDYRK1. The black box, grey box, and black line represent exon, untranslated regions (UTR), and intron, respectively. (B) CrDYRK1 possessed transcriptional activation activity. Isoform I and isoform II of CrDYRK1 were amplified from C. robusta and subcloned into BD vector with AD empty vector co-transformed into yeast strain Y2H, separately. Strain transformed with CrDYRK1 (isoform I) grew on medium supplemented with AbA (0.125 mg/L) and X-α-gal (40 mg/L). X-α-gal is another indicator of Y2H system. (C) The activation domain located in C-terminal of CrDYRK1. The truncate versions of CrDYRK1 (isoform I) were subcloned into BD vector for identifying the activation domain. The truncated CrDYRK1 (isoform I) (residues 427–647) showed transcriptional activation ability. And the activation activity was independent of kinase activity. (D,E) CrDYRK1 (isoform II) contained a repression domain in N-terminal (residues 1–168). CrDYRK1 (isoform II) (residues 1–168) was separately fused with two transcription factors, CrNFAT5 and CrMyc, for function analysis. The transcriptional activation activity of CrNFAT5 or CrMyc was obviously suppressed. (F) The residues 1–84 of CrDYRK1 (isoform II) are responsible for repression function. These truncated versions were used for exploring key region of CrDYRK1 repression domain, and the transcriptional activation activity appeared when deleting residues 1–84 of CrDYRK1 (isoform II). Left panel represent the vector construction and right panel indicate the yeast assay results in (B–F).
Biomolecules 13 00283 g002
Biomolecules 13 00283 g003 550
Figure 3. The on–off mechanism of transcriptional activation activity was conserved in HsDYRK1A. (A) The transcriptional activation ability was found in HsDYRK1A. The homologous regions of DYRK1 from diverse species with CrDYRK1 (isoform I) activation domain (residues 427–647) were amplified and used for function analysis in a yeast system, respectively. The result showed that human HsDYRK1A (residues 485–763) and another ascidian species C. savignyi CsDYRK1 (residues 393–626) presented transcriptional activation activity but HsDYRK1B (residues 437–629) did not. The homologous region (residues 629–1047) of DYRK1A in Drosophila (also called MNB) did not show the transcriptional activation activity either. (B) N-terminal of HsDYRK1A contained a repression domain. N-terminal (residues 1–69) could repress the transcriptional activation activity of HsDYRK1A (residues 485–763). Left panel represents the vector construction and right panel indicates the yeast assay results in (A,B).
Figure 3. The on–off mechanism of transcriptional activation activity was conserved in HsDYRK1A. (A) The transcriptional activation ability was found in HsDYRK1A. The homologous regions of DYRK1 from diverse species with CrDYRK1 (isoform I) activation domain (residues 427–647) were amplified and used for function analysis in a yeast system, respectively. The result showed that human HsDYRK1A (residues 485–763) and another ascidian species C. savignyi CsDYRK1 (residues 393–626) presented transcriptional activation activity but HsDYRK1B (residues 437–629) did not. The homologous region (residues 629–1047) of DYRK1A in Drosophila (also called MNB) did not show the transcriptional activation activity either. (B) N-terminal of HsDYRK1A contained a repression domain. N-terminal (residues 1–69) could repress the transcriptional activation activity of HsDYRK1A (residues 485–763). Left panel represents the vector construction and right panel indicates the yeast assay results in (A,B).
Biomolecules 13 00283 g003
Biomolecules 13 00283 g004 550
Figure 4. RNA-seq revealed potential roles of transactivation ability of HsDYRK1. (A) Volcano plot of the activation/repression group: 105 upregulated genes and 130 downregulated genes were identified (fold change >2 or <0.5 and p-value < 0.05). (B) Cellular component analysis of differential expression genes (DEGs): most DEGs were predicted to localize in plasma membrane (red box). (C) BP analysis of upregulated genes: upregulated genes were mainly involved in regulation of ion transport. (D) MF analysis of upregulated genes: upregulated genes were mainly enriched in calmodulin binding, motor activity, and sodium ion transmembrane transporter activity. (E) KEGG analysis of upregulated genes: upregulated genes were mainly enriched in neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction and cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction. (F) KEGG analysis of downregulated genes: downregulated genes were related to neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction and cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction.
Figure 4. RNA-seq revealed potential roles of transactivation ability of HsDYRK1. (A) Volcano plot of the activation/repression group: 105 upregulated genes and 130 downregulated genes were identified (fold change >2 or <0.5 and p-value < 0.05). (B) Cellular component analysis of differential expression genes (DEGs): most DEGs were predicted to localize in plasma membrane (red box). (C) BP analysis of upregulated genes: upregulated genes were mainly involved in regulation of ion transport. (D) MF analysis of upregulated genes: upregulated genes were mainly enriched in calmodulin binding, motor activity, and sodium ion transmembrane transporter activity. (E) KEGG analysis of upregulated genes: upregulated genes were mainly enriched in neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction and cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction. (F) KEGG analysis of downregulated genes: downregulated genes were related to neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction and cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction.
Biomolecules 13 00283 g004
Biomolecules 13 00283 g005 550
Figure 5. The activation domain of HsDYRK1A might be involved in DYRK1A-related intellectual disability syndrome. We collected the data from the UniProt database (https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/Q13627/entry). Some mutations were correlated to DYRK1A-related intellectual disability syndrome. The red represents the mutation-associated DYRK1A-related intellectual disability syndrome. The green represents the mutation of uncertain significance.
Figure 5. The activation domain of HsDYRK1A might be involved in DYRK1A-related intellectual disability syndrome. We collected the data from the UniProt database (https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/Q13627/entry). Some mutations were correlated to DYRK1A-related intellectual disability syndrome. The red represents the mutation-associated DYRK1A-related intellectual disability syndrome. The green represents the mutation of uncertain significance.
Biomolecules 13 00283 g005
Biomolecules 13 00283 g006 550
Figure 6. The motif analysis of upregulated gene promoters. (A) The representative DNA motifs of upregulated gene promoters: five representative motifs were shown. The height of the bases represents their frequency of occurrence at the positions. (B) The number of motif occurrences: There are 14 promoters that contained all five representative motifs. The adenine-rich DNA motif (RADACTCYRTYTYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWAAARAAAAAW) has the most broadly distributed at up to 73.95% (71/96). The Venn diagram was drawn using an online tool (https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/). (C) The localization of motifs in the regulation region. These enriched motifs were mainly localized at the translation initiation site upstream 500–1000 bp of activated genes.
Figure 6. The motif analysis of upregulated gene promoters. (A) The representative DNA motifs of upregulated gene promoters: five representative motifs were shown. The height of the bases represents their frequency of occurrence at the positions. (B) The number of motif occurrences: There are 14 promoters that contained all five representative motifs. The adenine-rich DNA motif (RADACTCYRTYTYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWAAARAAAAAW) has the most broadly distributed at up to 73.95% (71/96). The Venn diagram was drawn using an online tool (https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/). (C) The localization of motifs in the regulation region. These enriched motifs were mainly localized at the translation initiation site upstream 500–1000 bp of activated genes.
Biomolecules 13 00283 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ouyang, X.; Wang, Z.; Wu, B.; Yang, X.; Dong, B. The Conserved Transcriptional Activation Activity Identified in Dual-Specificity Tyrosine-(Y)-Phosphorylation-Regulated Kinase 1. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13020283

AMA Style

Ouyang X, Wang Z, Wu B, Yang X, Dong B. The Conserved Transcriptional Activation Activity Identified in Dual-Specificity Tyrosine-(Y)-Phosphorylation-Regulated Kinase 1. Biomolecules. 2023; 13(2):283. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13020283

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ouyang, Xiuke, Zhuqing Wang, Bingtong Wu, Xiuxia Yang, and Bo Dong. 2023. "The Conserved Transcriptional Activation Activity Identified in Dual-Specificity Tyrosine-(Y)-Phosphorylation-Regulated Kinase 1" Biomolecules 13, no. 2: 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13020283

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop