Next Article in Journal
Transcriptional Regulation Technology for Gene Perturbation in Fission Yeast
Next Article in Special Issue
Altered Purinergic Signaling in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Focus on P2 Receptors
Previous Article in Journal
Transcriptome Analysis of Redox Systems and Polyamine Metabolic Pathway in Hepatoma and Non-Tumor Hepatocyte-like Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Effect of Conformationally Locked Carbocyclic Guanine Nucleotides on Dynamin
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 13
Issue 4
10.3390/biom13040715
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adenosine A2A Receptors Shut Down Adenosine A1 Receptor-Mediated Presynaptic Inhibition to Promote Implementation of Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation

by
Cátia R. Lopes
1,
Francisco Q. Gonçalves
1,
Simão Olaio
1,
Angelo R. Tomé
1,2,
Rodrigo A. Cunha
1,3,* and
João Pedro Lopes
1
1
CNC-Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, 3004-504 Coimbra, Portugal
2
Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Coimbra, 3004-504 Coimbra, Portugal
3
Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-534 Coimbra, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2023, 13(4), 715; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13040715
Submission received: 24 March 2023 / Revised: 13 April 2023 / Accepted: 17 April 2023 / Published: 21 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmacology of Purinergic Receptors—Honorary Special Issue Dedicated to Prof. Pier Andrea Borea)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Adenosine operates a modulation system fine-tuning the efficiency of synaptic transmission and plasticity through A1 and A2A receptors (A1R, A2AR), respectively. Supramaximal activation of A1R can block hippocampal synaptic transmission, and the tonic engagement of A1R-mediated inhibition is increased with increased frequency of nerve stimulation. This is compatible with an activity-dependent increase in extracellular adenosine in hippocampal excitatory synapses, which can reach levels sufficient to block synaptic transmission. We now report that A2AR activation decreases A1R-medated inhibition of synaptic transmission, with particular relevance during high-frequency-induced long-term potentiation (LTP). Thus, whereas the A1R antagonist DPCPX (50 nM) was devoid of effects on LTP magnitude, the addition of an A2AR antagonist SCH58261 (50 nM) allowed a facilitatory effect of DPCPX on LTP to be revealed. Additionally, the activation of A2AR with CGS21680 (30 nM) decreased the potency of the A1R agonist CPA (6–60 nM) to inhibit hippocampal synaptic transmission in a manner prevented by SCH58261. These observations show that A2AR play a key role in dampening A1R during high-frequency induction of hippocampal LTP. This provides a new framework for understanding how the powerful adenosine A1R-mediated inhibition of excitatory transmission can be controlled to allow the implementation of hippocampal LTP.

1. Introduction

Adenosine is a modulator fine-tuning synaptic transmission and contributes to the encoding of the salience of information in neuronal networks [1] through the activation of inhibitory A1 receptors (A1R) and facilitatory A2A receptors (A2AR) [2]. A1R are the second more abundant G-protein-coupled receptors in the brain [3] with a predominant localization in synapses, mainly presynaptically [4], in accordance with their main role of controlling excitatory synaptic transmission through the inhibition of glutamate release [5]. A1R are powerful inhibitors of excitatory transmission since their supramaximal activation can block excitatory synaptic transmission (e.g., [6]). The extracellular adenosine that activates A1R is transiently increased in excitatory synapses, even after a single transmission event [7], through a combined outflow of adenosine from presynaptic (e.g., [8]) and postsynaptic neuronal compartments (e.g., [9]) as well as upon astrocytic release of ATP and its extracellular conversion into adenosine by ecto-nucleotidases [10] to ensure heterosynaptic depression [11,12]. Overall, the A1R neuromodulation system is viewed as an activity-dependent feedback inhibitory system (reviewed in [3,13]), which has an increasing ability to depress excitatory synapses the more they are recruited [14].
This hypothesis that extracellular adenosine builds up with increasing recruitment of synaptic activity poses a major conceptual problem when considering particularly intense patterns of stimulation that are able to trigger long-term increases of synaptic transmission—namely, long-term potentiation, which are considered the neurophysiological basis of memory [15]. In fact, under high-frequency stimulation, one would expect a robust increase in extracellular adenosine levels that could eventually block excitatory synaptic transmission through a supramaximal activation of A1R. Thus, the ability of intense patterns of stimulation to trigger LTP rather than to block excitatory transmission would require a mechanism able to shut down this powerful A1R inhibitory system. Accordingly, it is experimentally observed that A1R-mediated inhibition seems to be largely limited to control LTP magnitude (e.g., [16,17]). A possible mechanism to explain this shutdown of A1R would be based on the previously reported ability of A2AR to dampen A1R function in brain synapses [18,19,20,21]. In fact, it has previously been reported that A2AR activation can decrease A1R binding and A1R-mediated inhibition of synaptic transmission [18,19]. A2AR are selectively engaged under conditions of high frequency recruitment of hippocampal synapses: A2AR antagonists are essentially devoid of effects in the control of basal synaptic transmission (e.g., [17,22,23]), whereas A2AR are selectively engaged to control frequency-dependent synaptic plasticity processes such as LTP in the hippocampus (e.g., [17,22,23]) as well as in other brain regions [24,25,26]. This selective engagement of A2AR is associated with a high frequency-induced release of synaptic ATP [8,27] coupled to its extracellular conversion into adenosine through ecto-nucleotidases [28], and the physical association of ecto-5′-nucleotidase with A2AR [29] ensures that synaptic ATP-derived extracellular adenosine selectively activates A2AR [26,30,31,32,33,34]. However, although the A2AR-mediated shutdown of A1R function is a tempting hypothesis to understand the dampening of A1R-mediated control of LTP, this mechanism still needs to be experimentally confirmed.
Thus, the present study was designed to test: (i) if extracellular adenosine does indeed build up in synapses according to the increased recruitment of hippocampal excitatory synapses, and (ii) if A2AR do indeed play a key role in dampening A1R during LTP induction to allow the implementation of LTP free of a putatively robust A1R-mediated inhibition.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

We used adult C57bl/6j mice with 4–6 months of age of both sexes, obtained from Charles River (Barcelona, Spain). The animals were housed under controlled temperature (23 ± 2 °C) and subject to a fixed 12 h light/dark cycle, with free access to food and water. Animal procedures were performed in accordance with European Community guidelines (EU Directive 2010/63/EU) and the Portuguese law on animal care (1005/92), and they were approved by the Ethical Committee of the Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology of Coimbra (ORBEA-128/2015). All efforts were made to reduce the number of animals used and to minimize their stress and discomfort. Thus, the animals were anesthetized in a halothane atmosphere before decapitation and, whereas the hippocampus was used in this study, other tissues from these animals were collected for use in different projects at our research center.

2.2. Dugs

N6-cyclopenthyladenosine (CPA), 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), 3-{4-[2-({6-amino-9-[(2R,3R,4S,5S)-5-(ethylcarbamoyl)-3,4-dihydroxyoxolan-2-yl]-9H-purin-2-yl}amino)ethyl]phenyl}-propanoic acid (CGS21680) and 2-(2-furanyl)-7-(2-phenylethyl)-7H-pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-5-amine (SCH58261) were from Tocris (Bristol, UK). Adenosine and adenosine deaminase (ADA) were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). CPA, CGS21680, DPCPX and SCH58261 were made up as 5 mM stock solutions in dimethylsulfoxide (Sigma) and dilutions were prepared in artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF, see constitution below), controlling for the impact of the residual amount of dimethylsulfoxide. ADA, DPCPX, SCH58261 and CGS21680 were used in supramaximal but selective concentrations: respectively, 2 U/mL [35], 50–100 nM [6], 50 nM [22,36], and 30 nM [37].

2.3. Adenosine Release from Mouse Hippocampal Synaptosomes

Adenosine release was assayed essentially as previously described [38]. Briefly, hippocampal synaptosomes were prepared using Percoll/sucrose gradients [39] and resuspended in Krebs–HEPES solution (in mM: NaCl 113, KCl 3, KH2PO4 1.2, MgSO4 1.2, CaCl2 2.5, NaHCO3 25, glucose 10, HEPES 15, pH 7.4, 37 °C). Hippocampal synaptosomes (1.2–1.4 mg protein/mL) were then incubated at 37 °C for 5 min before adding different amounts of a concentrated KCl solution (5 M) to end up with final K+ concentrations of 3 (control, no additionally added K+), 10, 15, 30 or 60 mM. After 5 min, the mixtures were centrifuged at 14,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was used for the analysis of the extracellular levels of adenosine.
The separation and quantification of adenosine and its metabolites was carried out by HPLC, as previously described [40], employing a LiChroCart-RT125-4 C-18 reverse-phase column (particle size, 5 μm) combined with a UV detector set to 254 nm (Gold System, Beckman). The mobile phase was KH2PO4 (100 mM) and methanol (85/15 v/v%) at pH 6.50 with a flow rate of 1 mL/min and an injection loop volume of 50 μL. The identification and quantification of adenosine and its metabolites was achieved by calculating the peak areas then converted to concentration values (expressed as nmol/mg protein) by calibration with standards ranging from 0.1 to 50 μM.

2.4. Electrophysiological Recordings

Following sacrifice by decapitation, the mouse brain was quickly removed and placed in ice-cold, oxygenated (95% O2, 5% CO2), artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF; in mM: 124.0 NaCl, 4.4 KCl, 1.0 Na2HPO4, 25.0 NaHCO3, 2.0 CaCl2, 1.0 MgCl2, 10.0 glucose). Slices (400 µm-thick) from the dorsal hippocampus were cut transverse to the long axis of the hippocampus with a McIlwain tissue chopper (Mickle Laboratory Engineering Co., Surrey, UK) and maintained for at least 1 h prior to recording in a holding chamber with oxygenated ACSF at room temperature. Slices were then transferred to a submerged recording chamber and superfused at 3 mL/min with oxygenated ACSF kept at 30.5 °C. Electrophysiological recordings of field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSP) were carried out as previously described (e.g., [41]) with the recording electrode, filled with 4 M NaCl (2–5 MΩ resistance), placed in the CA1 stratum radiatum targeting the distal dendrites of pyramidal neurons and the stimulating bipolar concentric electrode placed in the proximal CA1 stratum radiatum. Rectangular pulses of 0.1 ms were delivered every 20 s through a Grass S44 or a Grass S48 square pulse stimulator (Grass Technologies, Singapore). After amplification (ISO-80, World Precision Instruments, Singapore), the recordings were digitized (Pico ADC-42, Pico Technologies Ltd., St. Neots, UK), averaged in groups of 3, and analyzed using the WinLTP version 2.10 software [42]. The intensity of stimulation was chosen between 50–60% of maximal fEPSP response, determined on the basis of input/output curves in which the percentage of the maximum fEPSP slope was plotted versus stimulus intensity.
Alterations of synaptic transmission were quantified as the percentage modification of the average value of the fEPSP slope taken from 15 to 20 min after beginning the application of tested drugs (DPCPX, SCH58261, adenosine, ADA, or CPA) in relation to the average value of the fEPSP slope during the 5 min that preceded the application of each tested drug. The EC50 value of CPA-mediated inhibition was calculated by a sigmoid fitting (variable slope and with a constant bottom value of zero) of the log concentration-response curve, as previously performed [6]. To assess the frequency-dependent effect of DPCPX, we delivered groups of 10 pulses at each tested frequency from 1 to 100 Hz first, with inter-group intervals of 10 min without stimulation (see [43]), first in the absence and then in the presence of 100 nM DPCPX. The effect of DPCPX was calculated as the ratio of the average slopes of last 5 fEPSPs in each group in the absence and in the presence of DPCPX, both normalized by the baseline calibrated with input-output curves carried out before and after DPCPX exposure. Long-term potentiation (LTP) was induced by a high-frequency stimulation train (100 Hz for 1 s). LTP was quantified as the percentage change between the average slope of the 10 fEPSPs between 50 and 60 min after LTP induction in relation to the average slope of the fEPSPs measured during the 10 min that preceded LTP induction. The effect of drugs on LTP was assessed by comparing LTP amplitude in the absence and presence of the drug in experiments carried out in different slices from the same animal.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Except for EC50 values that are presented as mean and 95% confidence interval, all values are presented as mean ± S.E.M. of n preparations (slices or synaptosomes from different mice). Alterations compared to baseline were estimated with a one-sample Student’s t test and the comparison of two experimental conditions was performed using an unpaired Student’s t test. Otherwise, statistical analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. p < 0.05 was taken as threshold to consider statistical significance. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Intensity- and Frequency-Dependent Increase of Extracellular Adenosine in Hippocampal Synapses

Adenosine caused a concentration-dependent inhibition of hippocampal synaptic transmission in the range of 6–60 μM (Figure 1A) and the highest concentration of adenosine (60 μM) nearly blocked hippocampal synaptic transmission (89.4 ± 2.9% inhibition, n = 6), as previously reported (e.g., [44]). As shown in Figure 1A, the removal of extracellular adenosine using adenosine deaminase (ADA 2 U/mL) caused a desinhibition of hippocampal synaptic transmission (35.4 ± 1.9% facilitation, n = 6), which was essentially equivalent (p > 0.05; unpaired Student’s t test) to the desinhibition caused by the selective A1R antagonist DPCPX (50 nM) (29.2 ± 2.6% facilitation, n = 6), confirming that extracellular adenosine seems to be only acting through inhibitory A1R under basal conditions of stimulation [17,41]. To estimate the concentration of adenosine in an active hippocampal glutamatergic synapse, the inhibitory effect of exogenously added adenosine was compared with the desinhibition caused by ADA. As illustrated in Figure 1B, the concentration of endogenous extracellular adenosine in active glutamatergic synapses under ‘basal’ stimulation (at 0.1 Hz) was estimated to be 8 µM.
We then used two parallel approaches to investigate if an increased recruitment of hippocampal synapses would trigger an increased outflow of adenosine. First, we subjected hippocampal synaptosomes (purified synapses) to increasing concentrations of K+ (from 10 to 60 mM), which lead to an increased depolarization of synaptosomes corresponding to a low all the way up to high intensities of stimulation of the nerve terminals (e.g., [45,46,47). As shown in Figure 1C, increasing concentrations of extracellular K+ triggered a progressive increase in the extracellular levels of adenosine (p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA), showing that the outflow of adenosine from nerve terminals increases with increasing intensities of potassium-induced synaptic depolarization. The second approach was based on the evaluation of the disinhibition of hippocampal synaptic transmission caused by blockade of A1R with 100 nM DPCPX, under conditions of administration of a limited number of pulses at increasing frequencies of stimulation. As summarized in Figure 1D, the disinhibition of hippocampal synaptic transmission caused by DPCPX (100 nM) was larger with increasing frequencies of stimulation (p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA), which is compatible with the conclusion that the synaptic levels of adenosine increase with increasing frequencies of stimulation. In fact, the average facilitation by DPCPX at 100 Hz (106.4 ± 11.1% facilitation, n = 5) was larger (p < 0.001, Tukey’s post hoc test) than at 10 Hz (62.1 ± 6.4% facilitation, n = 5); also, the facilitation by DPCPX at 50 Hz (83.0 ± 7.9% facilitation, n = 5) was larger (p < 0.01, Tukey’s post hoc test) than at 10 Hz; and the facilitation by DPCPX at 10 Hz was larger (p < 0.05, Tukey’s post hoc test) than at 1 Hz (33.9 ± 4.9% facilitation, n = 5).
It is striking to note that the desinhibition caused by DPCPX at the highest frequency of stimulation tested (106.4 ± 11.1% facilitation, n = 5, at 100 Hz) lead to an estimated concentration of endogenous extracellular adenosine in active glutamatergic synapses of over 60 µM (using the same rationale as described for Figure 1B for ‘basal’ stimulation at 0.1 Hz). Even if such an extrapolation might be unprecise, it prompts a paradoxical scenario: at frequencies used to trigger a robust long-term potentiation (LTP, with a larger number of pulses at 100 Hz), the levels of extracellular adenosine in excitatory glutamatergic synapses should be sufficient to nearly block synaptic transmission, rather than allowing a potentiation of synaptic transmission. Since more than 20 pulses at 100 Hz trigger an LTP rather than a blockade of excitatory transmission, our new data on the frequency-dependent increase in extracellular synaptic adenosine imply that A1R-mediated inhibition needs to be shutdown to allow high-frequency stimulation patterns to trigger an LTP.

3.2. A2AR Blockade Untethers an A1R-Mediated Inhibition of Hippocampal LTP

The application of a high-frequency train (HFS) with 100 pulses at 100 Hz triggered a long-term potentiation (LTP) in Schaffer fiber-CA1 pyramid synapses of mouse hippocampal slices. As shown in Figure 2A,B, the blockade of A1R with 50 nM DPCPX did not significantly (p = 0.095; unpaired Student’s t test) modify the magnitude of LTP (53.7 ± 2.7% over baseline in the absence and 61.5 ± 3.2% in the presence of DPCPX, n = 6), confirming that A1R do not tonically modulate LTP in hippocampal slices of adult mice (see [16,17]). In contrast, the selective blockade of A2AR with 50 nM SCH58261 significantly decreased (p < 0.001; unpaired Student’s t test) the magnitude of LTP (51.4 ± 2.0% over baseline in the absence and 27.2 ± 1.9% in the presence of SCH58261, n = 5; Figure 2C,D), confirming that A2AR tonically facilitate LTP magnitude in hippocampal slices of adult mice (see [17]). Remarkably, when A2AR were blocked by SCH58261, it was possible to highlight a facilitatory effect (p < 0.001; unpaired Student’s t test) of DPCPX on the magnitude of LTP (in the continuous presence of SCH58261, LTP magnitude was 27.2 ± 1.9% in the absence and 50.3 ± 3.0% in the presence of DPCPX, n = 5; Figure 2E,F). This shows that A2AR blockade unveils an ability of tonic A1R activation to inhibit LTP magnitude. In contrast, the tonic activation of A2AR maintains its ability to facilitate LTP magnitude irrespective of the blockade of A1R: in fact, in the presence of DPCPX, SCH58261 significantly decreased (p < 0.001; unpaired Student’s t test) the magnitude of LTP (in the continuous presence of DPCPX, LTP magnitude was 61.5 ± 3.2% in the absence and 46.9 ± 1.3% in the presence of SCH58261, n = 6; Figure 2G,H). However, it is important to note that the amplitude of the effect of SCH58261 was lower (p < 0.001; unpaired Student’s t test) in the presence of DPCPX (23.6 ± 1.4% decrease in LTP magnitude) than in its absence (47.1 ± 3.7% decrease in LTP magnitude), which indicates that the impact of A2AR on LTP is a composite of an inhibition of A1R inhibition and a direct facilitatory effect of A2AR through other mechanisms (e.g., [22]).

3.3. A2AR Activation Dampens A1R-Mediated Inhibition of Hippocampal Transmission

In contrast to the previously described ability of the tonic activation of A2AR to control LTP and the modulation by A1R of LTP, SCH58261 (50 nM) was devoid of effects on basal synaptic transmission (−1.35 ± 1.49% variation of baseline fEPSP slope alone and 1.44 ± 1.60% in the presence of DPCPX, n = 5, p > 0.05, t-test vs. 0%) and did not modify the disinhibition of basal synaptic transmission caused by the blockade of A1R by 50 nM DPCPX (28.0 ± 7.0% variation of baseline fEPSP slope by DPCPX in the absence and 28.6 ± 6.6% in the presence of SCH58261, n = 5, p > 0.05, unpaired Student’s t test) (Figure 3A,B).
However, the activation of A2AR with a supramaximal concentration of the exogenously added A2AR agonist, CGS21680 (30 nM; [37]), confirmed that A2AR activation attenuates the ability of A1R to inhibit synaptic transmission. In fact, as shown in Figure 3C, the selective A1R agonist CPA (6–60 nM) inhibited basal synaptic transmission in a concentration-dependent manner, and this inhibitory effect was attenuated in the presence of 30 nM CGS21680, which by itself did not significantly affect basal synaptic transmission (8.0 ± 4.0% variation of baseline fEPSP slope, n = 4, p > 0.05, t-test vs. 0%). As depicted in Figure 3D, the EC50 of CPA to inhibit basal synaptic transmission was 13.9 nM (95% confidence interval of 11.0–16.8 nM, n = 6) and it was shifted to the right in the presence of 30 nM CGS21680 (EC50 = 34.8 nM, 95% confidence interval of 25.8–43.8 nM, n = 4). Notably, this effect of CGS21680 on CPA-induced inhibition was eliminated in the presence of 50 nM SCH58261 (EC50 = 15.3 nM, 95% confidence interval of 9.7–20.8 nM, n = 4; Figure 3D), showing that the effect of CGS21680 is due to A2AR activation. SCH58261 (50 nM) did not affect the CPA-induced inhibition of basal synaptic transmission (EC50 = 14.3 nM, 95% confidence interval of 9.9–18.6 nM, n = 4). Finally, the time course experiment depicted in Figure 3C shows that this A2AR-induced attenuation of A1R-mediated inhibition disappeared upon the washing out of CGS21680 (n = 2), suggesting that it may be a short-lived inhibition dependent on the ongoing activation of A2AR.
Finally, we tested the impact of the exogenous activation of A1R on hippocampal LTP. Always compared to baseline, CPA (30 nM) alone decreased LTP magnitude by 41.0 ± 7.0% (65.5 ± 6.3% over baseline in the absence and 38.7 ± 5.5% in the presence of CPA, n = 4, p = 0.018 < 0.05, unpaired Student’s t test) (Figure 3E,G), whereas in the presence of 50 nM SCH58261, CPA (30 nM) caused a quantitatively lower (16.9 ± 0.9%, n = 4) inhibitory effect (in the continuous presence of SCH58261, LTP magnitude was 34.04 ± 1.4% over baseline in the absence and 28.3 ± 1.1% in the presence of CPA, n = 4, p = 0.016, unpaired Student’s t test) (Figure 3F,G). This prompts two tentative conclusions: (i) the unleashing of a robust A1R tonic inhibition upon the A2AR blockade by endogenous adenosine (see Figure 2) forces a ceiling-like effect for A1R-mediated inhibition, which limits the additional inhibitory impact of the exogenous activation of A1R with CPA; (ii) since A1R only inhibited LTP (maximally by circa 60%) whereas A1R nearly blocked basal synaptic transmission (e.g., Figure 1A and Figure 3C), there might be other mechanisms, apart from the presently described ability of A2AR activation, to restrain A1R-mediated inhibition of hippocampal excitatory transmission during LTP induction.

4. Discussion

The present study provides evidence supporting a new framework for understanding how the powerful adenosine A1R-mediated inhibition of excitatory transmission can be controlled to allow the implementation of long-term increases of synaptic transmission (LTP) upon high-frequency stimulation. Thus, in spite of the increased synaptic levels of adenosine triggered by high frequency trains, the selective engagement of A2AR during these high frequency trains decreases the efficiency of the A1R-mediated inhibition to allow the implementation of LTP. This conclusion was based on two parallel and concurrent pieces of evidence: (i) the activation of A2AR decreases the efficiency of A1R activation to inhibit excitatory synaptic transmission; (ii) the blockade of A2AR during LTP revealed an ability of A1R to control LTP magnitude, which was absent under conditions of basal synaptic transmission.
The presently described ability of A2AR to shut-down A1R-mediated inhibition is selectively engaged during LTP induction. As previously demonstrated, this likely results from the increased ATP release during high frequency stimulation [8,27] associated with the CD73-mediated formation of ATP-derived adenosine that selectively activates synaptic A2AR during LTP [22,26,31,32,33,34]. In fact, SCH58261 was devoid of effects during basal synaptic transmission (see Figure 3) while it decreased LTP magnitude, as previously reported in these and other brain synapses (reviewed in [48]). The impact of A2AR on LTP is expected to involve at least two parallel mechanisms: (i) on one hand, there is an ability of A2AR to engage p38 and Src kinases to increase synaptic function [22,49,50]; (ii) on the other hand, the facilitatory effect of A2AR on LTP might also result from the presently described attenuation of inhibitory A1R-mediated effects in excitatory synapses. The observed effect of SCH58261 in the presence of DPCPX (Figure 2G,H) clearly indicates that A2AR can directly control LTP magnitude independently of A1R. However, the observed lower amplitude of the effect of SCH58261 in the presence (Figure 2G,H) compared to absence of DPCPX (Figure 2C,D) also shows that there is a contribution of the A2AR-mediated control of A1R for the control of LTP magnitude by A2AR.
The mechanism operated by A2AR to dampen A1R function in hippocampal synapses still needs to be characterized. Previous studies in striatal synapses indicated that A1R and A2AR form heteromeric complexes, where A2AR inhibit A1R-mediated signaling [20]; however, the formation of A1R-A2AR heteromers has not been documented in hippocampal synapses. It has been demonstrated that A1R and A2AR are co-localized in glutamatergic terminals of the hippocampus [51], but the sole existence of an A1R-A2AR heteromeric mechanism underlying the synaptic shut-down of A1R by A2AR is somewhat difficult to reconcile with the far more abundant density of synaptic A1R compared to the circa 20-times lower density of A2AR in hippocampal synapses (cf. [4,52]). An alternative that may enable this quantitative discrepancy of A1R versus A2AR densities in hippocampal synapses to be overcome might be to conceive that A1R function in synapses is controlled by the engagement of the A2AR transducing system. The traditional view is that A1R and A2AR are oppositely coupled to the activity of adenylcyclase-cAMP-protein kinase A pathway, but the evidence to support the involvement of this canonical pathway in the control by A1R and A2AR of excitatory synaptic transmission still needs to be provided (reviewed in [2]). Clearly, the definition of the different transducing systems operated by synaptic A1R and A2AR will be required prior to the further probing of this hypothesis that the engagement of A2AR-induced transduction system may be responsible for controlling the coupling of A1R with G-proteins and/or the intracellular or intra-membrane transducing systems operated by A1R to depress excitatory synaptic transmission. The latter also still need to be experimentally defined. Additionally, the question of whether this A2AR-mediated control of A1R function is mostly taking place presynaptically to control glutamate release or postsynaptically to control the responsiveness to glutamate will need to be determined. In fact, both A1R and A2AR are located presynaptically and postsynaptically in hippocampal synapses [4,52], and there is previous evidence showing that A1R [5] and A2AR can affect excitatory transmission in the hippocampus by both presynaptic and postsynaptic effects [19,22,53,54].
The ability reported here of A2AR to shut down A1R-mediated inhibition during high-frequency stimulation in order to allow the implementation of LTP also prompts questions regarding whether the engagement of A2AR upon high-frequency stimulation might also shut down other inhibitory modulation systems in synapses. In fact, apart from A1R, there are other synaptic inhibitory modulation systems that are also expected to be recruited in an activity-dependent manner, in particular the cannabinoid CB1R system. CB1R are also located in hippocampal excitatory synapses [55], and their activation can depress excitatory synaptic transmission as well as LTP in the hippocampus (e.g., [56]). Interestingly, A2AR can control CB1R-mediated inhibition (e.g., [57,58]), namely, in hippocampal synapses [59,60], and it remains to be tested whether an eventual A2AR-induced down-regulation of CB1R-mediated inhibition might also contribute to LTP induction. The same rationale might apply for GABABR or P2Y1R that inhibit hippocampal glutamate synapses (e.g., [61,62]), with the latter shown to be modulated by A2AR in astrocytes [63].
It is interesting to note that the comparison of the impact on A1R function of endogenously activated A2AR with the exogenous pharmacological activation of A2AR revealed some unexpected differences. In fact, the exposure to CGS21680, expected to supramaximally activate A2AR, appears to be less efficacious to modulate A1R function (Figure 3C) when compared to the exposure of SCH58261 (Figure 2F and Figure 3G), which only reveals the effects of endogenously activated A2AR. This might be associated with the previous description of adenosine receptors in the hippocampus with an atypical pharmacological profile [64,65,66], leading to the possibility that CGS21680 might also directly interact with A1R in the hippocampus (e.g., [66]). Another factor contributing to the apparently greater efficiency of the endogenous versus exogenous activation of A2AR to control A1R function and LTP magnitude is the existence of different pools of A2AR with different and, often, opposite effects, as illustrated by the different impact of neuronal and astrocytic A2AR in the hippocampus [67], the presynaptic and postsynaptic A2AR in the striatum [68,69], or A2AR in different brain regions (cf. [24,70]). In fact, upon LTP, there is a predominant activation of A2AR in forebrain neurons by ATP-derived extracellular adenosine as a result of an increased synaptic release of ATP (e.g., [22,31,32]); in contrast, when applying CGS21680, all different populations of A2AR will be pharmacologically engaged, namely, some populations of A2AR that may not be physiologically recruited during LTP. In this sense, it is unwise to directly compare the effects of endogenously activated A2AR (indirectly assessed by the effects of SCH58261) and the effects of exogenous activation of A2AR with CGS21680.
This mechanism of A2AR-mediated downregulation of A1R function is selectively engaged under LTP-like conditions and is not operating at other firing patterns that are not associated with the activation of A2AR. This reinforces our previous contention that A1R function is a low pass filter to limit basal synaptic transmission, which likely increases its functional impact with increasing intensities of synaptic recruitment until A2AR are engaged to turn off this gating system. In fact, A1R are conceptualized as a feedback homeostatic mechanism to restrain excessive excitatory synaptic transmission (reviewed in [3]). The A1R inhibitory system is proposed (see [13]) to be a common operator of autocrine control of synaptic activity with feedback presynaptic inhibition upon increased outflow of adenosine as a result of postsynaptic activation [9,71,72] and, also, paracrine control in the circuit through processes of heterosynaptic depression involving the outflow of adenosine from astrocytes [10] or microglia [73]. The A1R-mediated negative-feedback mechanism is engaged even after a single stimulation pulse [7], and it maintains its efficiency over a wide dynamic range in neocortical synapses [14] as well as in hippocampal synapses (see Figure 1D), namely in conditions of mild induction of synaptic potentiation that might be not be sufficient to not engage A2AR, such as upon metabolic imbalance- [74], NO- [16], chemically- [75], or theta burst-induced potentiation [76,77]. In contrast, upon high-frequency stimulation, A1R have a limited role in the control of LTP magnitude, as also previously observed using a pharmacological blockade of A1R [16,17] or upon genetic deletion of A1R [78]. Importantly, when A2AR are blocked, thus eliminating the constraint on A1R function, it was found that A1R were now able to robustly inhibit LTP magnitude (Figure 2E,F). Interestingly, there was an apparently lower efficacy of A1R to inhibit LTP (near 70% maximal inhibition) compared to the near blockade of basal synaptic transmission, even upon the blockade of A2AR. This may be for two reasons, which should be experimentally explored in future studies: (i) the different mechanism(s) operated by A1R to inhibit synaptic transmission (e.g., [5]) become less efficient under conditions of LTP; (ii) other synaptic modulation systems, apart from A2AR, are engaged during LTP to decrease A1R-mediated inhibition of excitatory transmission.
The ability of selectively engaging A2AR to control A1R function to format the magnitude of hippocampal LTP that was demonstrated here is strictly dependent on the dynamics of the extracellular levels of purines, specifically within excitatory synapses, where these processes are taking place. We have now confirmed in hippocampal synapses that there is an activity-dependent increase in A1R-mediated inhibition of hippocampal synaptic transmission with increasing frequencies of stimulation (Figure 1D), consistent with an activity-dependent build-up of extracellular adenosine within excitatory synapses of the hippocampus, as previously shown to occur in the neocortex [14]. This increased outflow of adenosine with increasing intensities of nerve stimulation was further confirmed in synaptosomes (Figure 1C), identifying the presynaptic compartment as an additional source of activity-dependent outflow of extracellular adenosine. We did not investigate the mechanism of this synaptic outflow of adenosine, which has previously been suggested to involve a release of adenosine through exocytosis [79] or through equilibrative nucleoside transporters [8,71,72] as well as an ATP-derived formation of extracellular adenosine through the ecto-nucleotidase pathway [8]. Instead, we attempted to indirectly estimate the synaptic ‘concentration’ of adenosine based on its synaptic effects, and we reached an estimate of 8 µM under basal stimulation conditions and of over 60 µM upon high-frequency stimulation. These values are one to two orders of magnitude higher than these previously reported using several elegant techniques, such as microdialysis (0.04–0.9 µM; [80,81]), enzyme-based sensors (0.25–1 µM; [71,74,82]), voltammetry-based electrodes (0.2 µM; [83]), or adenosine-sensor cells (0.1 µM; [84]). Since the size of the devices used in all of these elegant methods to detect transient variations of the extracellular levels of adenosine only allows quantification of the levels of extracellular adenosine outside synapses, the present estimates indicate the existence of a strong gradient of extracellular adenosine within and surrounding excitatory synapses. The existence of such spatial gradients of extracellular adenosine makes it illogical that such a thing as an extracellular ‘concentration’ of adenosine might exist. Importantly, this gradient is expected to vary dynamically according to the pattern of activity to allow adenosine to fulfil its different roles both as a modulator within synapses and as a neuron-glia signal also outside synapses (reviewed in [13]). Novel experimental strategies to directly monitor transient oscillations of synaptic and peri-synaptic adenosine will be required to clarify the relation between the spatiotemporal pattern of the extracellular levels of adenosine with the recruitment of the different adenosine receptors. Furthermore, given that a component of extracellular adenosine originating from CD73-mediated ATP-derived adenosine [22,26,31,32,33,34] is critical for A2AR activation and formats the status of A1R function, and since this ATP release is also pulsatile and transient according to the pattern of synaptic stimulation [8,26,27,85], comprehension of the dynamic function of the adenosine neuromodulation system will require the clarification of the spatiotemporal dynamics of both extracellular ATP and adenosine within different synapses.

5. Conclusions

The present study identifies the engagement of A2AR during high frequency-induced LTP as a key mechanism to shut-down the robust A1R-mediated inhibition engaged by the activity-dependent increase of extracellular adenosine in excitatory hippocampal synapses.

Author Contributions

C.R.L., F.Q.G., S.O. and J.P.L. carried out the electrophysiological recordings; F.Q.G., A.R.T. and R.A.C. carried out the studies in synaptosomes; R.A.C. coordinated the project and wrote the manuscript, which was revised and commented by all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Supported by La Caixa Foundation (LCF/PR/HP17/52190001), Centro 2020 (CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000008:BrainHealth2020 and CENTRO-01-0246-FEDER-000010) and FCT (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-03127 and UIDB/04539/2020).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology of Coimbra (ORBEA-128/2015).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

CRL was under receipt of a fellowship from FCT (2021.06954.BD).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Abbreviations

A1R: adenosine A1 receptors; A2AR: adenosine A2A receptors; ACSF: artificial cerebrospinal fluid; ADA: adenosine deaminase; CPA: N6-cyclopenthyladenosine; DPCPX: 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine; EPSP: excitatory postsynaptic potential; LTP: long-term potentiation; SCH58261: 2-(2-furanyl)-7-(2-phenylethyl)-7H-pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-5-amine.

References

  1. Cunha, R.A. Different cellular sources and different roles of adenosine: A1 receptor-mediated inhibition through astrocytic-driven volume transmission and synapse-restricted A2A receptor-mediated facilitation of plasticity. Neurochem. Int. 2008, 52, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fredholm, B.B.; Chen, J.F.; Cunha, R.A.; Svenningsson, P.; Vaugeois, J.M. Adenosine and brain function. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2005, 63, 191–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dunwiddie, T.V.; Masino, S.A. The role and regulation of adenosine in the central nervous system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2001, 24, 31–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rebola, N.; Pinheiro, P.C.; Oliveira, C.R.; Malva, J.O.; Cunha, R.A. Subcellular localization of adenosine A1 receptors in nerve terminals and synapses of the rat hippocampus. Brain Res. 2003, 987, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Thompson, S.M.; Haas, H.L.; Gähwiler, B.H. Comparison of the actions of adenosine at pre- and postsynaptic receptors in the rat hippocampus in vitro. J. Physiol. 1992, 451, 347–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sebastião, A.M.; Cunha, R.A.; de Mendonça, A.; Ribeiro, J.A. Modification of adenosine modulation of synaptic transmission in the hippocampus of aged rats. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2000, 131, 1629–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mitchell, J.B.; Lupica, C.R.; Dunwiddie, T.V. Activity-dependent release of endogenous adenosine modulates synaptic responses in the rat hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 1993, 13, 3439–3447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cunha, R.A.; Vizi, E.S.; Ribeiro, J.A.; Sebastião, A.M. Preferential release of ATP and its extracellular catabolism as a source of adenosine upon high- but not low-frequency stimulation of rat hippocampal slices. J. Neurochem. 1996, 67, 2180–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lovatt, D.; Xu, Q.; Liu, W.; Takano, T.; Smith, N.A.; Schnermann, J.; Tieu, K.; Nedergaard, M. Neuronal adenosine release, and not astrocytic ATP release, mediates feedback inhibition of excitatory activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 6265–6270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pascual, O.; Casper, K.B.; Kubera, C.; Zhang, J.; Revilla-Sanchez, R.; Sul, J.Y.; Takano, H.; Moss, S.J.; McCarthy, K.; Haydon, P.G. Astrocytic purinergic signaling coordinates synaptic networks. Science 2005, 310, 113–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Serrano, A.; Haddjeri, N.; Lacaille, J.C.; Robitaille, R. GABAergic network activation of glial cells underlies hippocampal heterosynaptic depression. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 5370–5382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bannon, N.M.; Chistiakova, M.; Chen, J.Y.; Bazhenov, M.; Volgushev, M. Adenosine shifts plasticity regimes between associative and homeostatic by modulating heterosynaptic changes. J. Neurosci. 2017, 37, 1439–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Agostinho, P.; Madeira, D.; Dias, L.; Simões, A.P.; Cunha, R.A.; Canas, P.M. Purinergic signaling orchestrating neuron-glia communication. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 162, 105253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wall, M.J.; Richardson, M.J. Localized adenosine signaling provides fine-tuned negative feedback over a wide dynamic range of neocortical network activities. J. Neurophysiol. 2015, 113, 871–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bear, M.F.; Malenka, R.C. Synaptic plasticity: LTP and LTD. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1994, 4, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bon, C.L.; Garthwaite, J. Adenosine acting on A1 receptors protects NO-triggered rebound potentiation and LTP in rat hippocampal slices. J. Neurophysiol. 2002, 87, 1781–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Costenla, A.R.; Diógenes, M.J.; Canas, P.M.; Rodrigues, R.J.; Nogueira, C.; Maroco, J.; Agostinho, P.M.; Ribeiro, J.A.; Cunha, R.A.; de Mendonça, A. Enhanced role of adenosine A2A receptors in the modulation of LTP in the rat hippocampus upon ageing. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2011, 34, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lopes, L.V.; Cunha, R.A.; Ribeiro, J.A. Cross talk between A1 and A2A adenosine receptors in the hippocampus and cortex of young adult and old rats. J. Neurophysiol. 1999, 82, 3196–3203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lopes, L.V.; Cunha, R.A.; Kull, B.; Fredholm, B.B.; Ribeiro, J.A. Adenosine A2A receptor facilitation of hippocampal synaptic transmission is dependent on tonic A1 receptor inhibition. Neuroscience 2002, 112, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ciruela, F.; Casadó, V.; Rodrigues, R.J.; Luján, R.; Burgueño, J.; Canals, M.; Borycz, J.; Rebola, N.; Goldberg, S.R.; Mallol, J.; et al. Presynaptic control of striatal glutamatergic neurotransmission by adenosine A1-A2A receptor heteromers. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 2080–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bannon, N.M.; Zhang, P.; Ilin, V.; Chistiakova, M.; Volgushev, M. Modulation of synaptic transmission by adenosine in layer 2/3 of the rat visual cortex in vitro. Neuroscience 2014, 260, 171–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rebola, N.; Lujan, R.; Cunha, R.A.; Mulle, C. Adenosine A2A receptors are essential for long-term potentiation of NMDA-EPSCs at hippocampal mossy fiber synapses. Neuron 2008, 57, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Temido-Ferreira, M.; Ferreira, D.G.; Batalha, V.L.; Marques-Morgado, I.; Coelho, J.E.; Pereira, P.; Gomes, R.; Pinto, A.; Carvalho, S.; Canas, P.M.; et al. Age-related shift in LTD is dependent on neuronal adenosine A2A receptors interplay with mGluR5 and NMDA receptors. Mol. Psychiatry. 2020, 25, 1876–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Simões, A.P.; Machado, N.J.; Gonçalves, N.; Kaster, M.P.; Simões, A.T.; Nunes, A.; Pereira de Almeida, L.; Goosens, K.A.; Rial, D.; Cunha, R.A. Adenosine A2A receptors in the amygdala control synaptic plasticity and contextual fear memory. Neuropsychopharmacology 2016, 41, 2862–2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kerkhofs, A.; Canas, P.M.; Timmerman, A.J.; Heistek, T.S.; Real, J.I.; Xavier, C.; Cunha, R.A.; Mansvelder, H.D.; Ferreira, S.G. Adenosine A2A receptors control glutamatergic synaptic plasticity in fast spiking interneurons of the prefrontal cortex. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gonçalves, F.Q.; Matheus, F.C.; Silva, H.B.; Real, J.I.; Rial, D.; Rodrigues, R.J.; Oses, J.P.; Silva, A.C.; Gonçalves, N.; Prediger, R.D.; et al. Increased ATP release and higher impact of adenosine A2A receptors on corticostriatal plasticity in a rat model of presymptomatic Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2023, 60, 1659–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wieraszko, A.; Goldsmith, G.; Seyfried, T.N. Stimulation-dependent release of adenosine triphosphate from hippocampal slices. Brain Res. 1989, 485, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cunha, R.A. Regulation of the ecto-nucleotidase pathway in rat hippocampal nerve terminals. Neurochem. Res. 2001, 26, 979–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Augusto, E.; Matos, M.; Sévigny, J.; El-Tayeb, A.; Bynoe, M.S.; Müller, C.E.; Cunha, R.A.; Chen, J.F. Ecto-5′-nucleotidase (CD73)-mediated formation of adenosine is critical for the striatal adenosine A2A receptor functions. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 11390–11399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Carmo, M.; Gonçalves, F.Q.; Canas, P.M.; Oses, J.P.; Fernandes, F.D.; Duarte, F.V.; Palmeira, C.M.; Tomé, A.R.; Agostinho, P.; Andrade, G.M.; et al. Enhanced ATP release and CD73-mediated adenosine formation sustain adenosine A2A receptor over-activation in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 176, 3666–3680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gonçalves, F.Q.; Lopes, J.P.; Silva, H.B.; Lemos, C.; Silva, A.C.; Gonçalves, N.; Tomé, Â.R.; Ferreira, S.G.; Canas, P.M.; Rial, D.; et al. Synaptic and memory dysfunction in a β-amyloid model of early Alzheimer’s disease depends on increased formation of ATP-derived extracellular adenosine. Neurobiol. Dis. 2019, 132, 104570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Augusto, E.; Gonçalves, F.Q.; Real, J.E.; Silva, H.B.; Pochmann, D.; Silva, T.S.; Matos, M.; Gonçalves, N.; Tomé, Â.R.; Chen, J.F.; et al. Increased ATP release and CD73-mediated adenosine A2A receptor activation mediate convulsion-associated neuronal damage and hippocampal dysfunction. Neurobiol. Dis. 2021, 157, 105441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Simões, A.P.; Gonçalves, F.Q.; Rial, D.; Ferreira, S.G.; Lopes, J.P.; Canas, P.M.; Cunha, R.A. CD73-mediated formation of extracellular adenosine is responsible for adenosine A2A receptor-mediated control of fear memory and amygdala plasticity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dias, L.; Pochmann, D.; Lemos, C.; Silva, H.B.; Real, J.I.; Gonçalves, F.Q.; Rial, D.; Gonçalves, N.; Simões, A.P.; Ferreira, S.G.; et al. Increased synaptic ATP release and CD73-mediated formation of extracellular adenosine in the control of behavioral and electrophysiological modifications caused by chronic stress. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2023, 14, 1299–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cunha, R.A. Release of ATP and adenosine and formation of extracellular adenosine in the hippocampus. In The Role of Adenosine in the Nervous System; Okada, Y., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997; pp. 135–142. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lopes, L.V.; Halldner, L.; Rebola, N.; Johansson, B.; Ledent, C.; Chen, J.F.; Fredholm, B.B.; Cunha, R.A. Binding of the prototypical adenosine A2A receptor agonist CGS 21680 to the cerebral cortex of adenosine A1 and A2A receptor knockout mice. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2004, 141, 1006–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cunha, R.A.; Constantino, M.D.; Ribeiro, J.A. ZM241385 is an antagonist of the facilitatory responses produced by the A2A adenosine receptor agonists CGS21680 and HENECA in the rat hippocampus. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1997, 122, 1279–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Garção, P.; Szabó, E.C.; Wopereis, S.; Castro, A.A.; Tomé, Â.R.; Prediger, R.D.; Cunha, R.A.; Agostinho, P.; Köfalvi, A. Functional interaction between pre-synaptic α6β2-containing nicotinic and adenosine A2A receptors in the control of dopamine release in the rat striatum. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 169, 1600–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Cunha, R.A.; Sebastião, A.M.; Ribeiro, J.A. Ecto-5′-nucleotidase is associated with cholinergic nerve terminals in the hippocampus but not in the cerebral cortex of the rat. J. Neurochem. 1992, 59, 657–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Cunha, R.A.; Sebastião, A.M. Adenosine and adenine nucleotides are independently released from both the nerve terminals and the muscle fibres upon electrical stimulation of the innervated skeletal muscle of the frog. Pflugers Arch. 1993, 424, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lopes, J.P.; Pliássova, A.; Cunha, R.A. The physiological effects of caffeine on synaptic transmission and plasticity in the mouse hippocampus selectively depend on adenosine A1 and A2A receptors. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2019, 166, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Anderson, W.W.; Collingridge, G.L. Capabilities of the WinLTP data acquisition program extending beyond basic LTP experimental functions. J. Neurosci. Methods 2007, 162, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Papaleonidopoulos, V.; Trompoukis, G.; Koutsoumpa, A.; Papatheodoropoulos, C. A gradient of frequency-dependent synaptic properties along the longitudinal hippocampal axis. BMC Neurosci. 2017, 18, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mendoza-Fernández, V.; Andrew, R.D.; Barajas-López, C. ATP inhibits glutamate synaptic release by acting at P2Y receptors in pyramidal neurons of hippocampal slices. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2000, 293, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Blaustein, M.P.; Goldring, J.M. Membrane potentials in pinched-off presynaptic nerve ternimals monitored with a fluorescent probe: Evidence that synaptosomes have potassium diffusion potentials. J. Physiol. 1975, 247, 589–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. McMahon, H.T.; Nicholls, D.G. The relationship between cytoplasmic free Ca2+ and the release of glutamate from synaptosomes. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1990, 18, 375–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Meder, W.; Fink, K.; Göthert, M. Involvement of different calcium channels in K+- and veratridine-induced increases of cytosolic calcium concentration in rat cerebral cortical synaptosomes. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 1997, 356, 797–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cunha, R.A. How does adenosine control neuronal dysfunction and neurodegeneration? J. Neurochem. 2016, 139, 1019–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Assaife-Lopes, N.; Sousa, V.C.; Pereira, D.B.; Ribeiro, J.A.; Chao, M.V.; Sebastião, A.M. Activation of adenosine A2A receptors induces TrkB translocation and increases BDNF-mediated phospho-TrkB localization in lipid rafts: Implications for neuromodulation. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 8468–8480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sarantis, K.; Tsiamaki, E.; Kouvaros, S.; Papatheodoropoulos, C.; Angelatou, F. Adenosine A2A receptors permit mGluR5-evoked tyrosine phosphorylation of NR2B (Tyr1472) in rat hippocampus: A possible key mechanism in NMDA receptor modulation. J. Neurochem. 2015, 135, 714–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rebola, N.; Rodrigues, R.J.; Lopes, L.V.; Richardson, P.J.; Oliveira, C.R.; Cunha, R.A. Adenosine A1 and A2A receptors are co-expressed in pyramidal neurons and co-localized in glutamatergic nerve terminals of the rat hippocampus. Neuroscience 2005, 133, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rebola, N.; Canas, P.M.; Oliveira, C.R.; Cunha, R.A. Different synaptic and subsynaptic localization of adenosine A2A receptors in the hippocampus and striatum of the rat. Neuroscience 2005, 132, 893–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Canas, P.M.; Porciúncula, L.O.; Cunha, G.M.; Silva, C.G.; Machado, N.J.; Oliveira, J.M.; Oliveira, C.R.; Cunha, R.A. Adenosine A2A receptor blockade prevents synaptotoxicity and memory dysfunction caused by beta-amyloid peptides via p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 14741–14751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Viana da Silva, S.; Haberl, M.G.; Zhang, P.; Bethge, P.; Lemos, C.; Gonçalves, N.; Gorlewicz, A.; Malezieux, M.; Gonçalves, F.Q.; Grosjean, N.; et al. Early synaptic deficits in the APP/PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease involve neuronal adenosine A2A receptors. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Köfalvi, A.; Rodrigues, R.J.; Ledent, C.; Mackie, K.; Vizi, E.S.; Cunha, R.A.; Sperlágh, B. Involvement of cannabinoid receptors in the regulation of neurotransmitter release in the rodent striatum: A combined immunochemical and pharmacological analysis. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 2874–2884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Silva-Cruz, A.; Carlström, M.; Ribeiro, J.A.; Sebastião, A.M. Dual influence of endocannabinoids on long-term potentiation of synaptic transmission. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ferreira, S.G.; Gonçalves, F.Q.; Marques, J.M.; Tomé, Â.R.; Rodrigues, R.J.; Nunes-Correia, I.; Ledent, C.; Harkany, T.; Venance, L.; Cunha, R.A.; et al. Presynaptic adenosine A2A receptors dampen cannabinoid CB1 receptor-mediated inhibition of corticostriatal glutamatergic transmission. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2015, 172, 1074–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Köfalvi, A.; Moreno, E.; Cordomí, A.; Cai, N.S.; Fernández-Dueñas, V.; Ferreira, S.G.; Guixà-González, R.; Sánchez-Soto, M.; Yano, H.; Casadó-Anguera, V.; et al. Control of glutamate release by complexes of adenosine and cannabinoid receptors. BMC Biol. 2020, 18, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Martire, A.; Tebano, M.T.; Chiodi, V.; Ferreira, S.G.; Cunha, R.A.; Köfalvi, A.; Popoli, P. Pre-synaptic adenosine A2A receptors control cannabinoid CB1 receptor-mediated inhibition of striatal glutamatergic neurotransmission. J. Neurochem. 2011, 116, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Aso, E.; Fernández-Dueñas, V.; López-Cano, M.; Taura, J.; Watanabe, M.; Ferrer, I.; Luján, R.; Ciruela, F. Adenosine A2A-cannabinoid CB1 receptor heteromers in the hippocampus: Cannabidiol blunts Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced cognitive impairment. Mol. Neurobiol. 2019, 56, 5382–5391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Laviv, T.; Riven, I.; Dolev, I.; Vertkin, I.; Balana, B.; Slesinger, P.A.; Slutsky, I. Basal GABA regulates GABABR conformation and release probability at single hippocampal synapses. Neuron 2010, 67, 253–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rodrigues, R.J.; Almeida, T.; Richardson, P.J.; Oliveira, C.R.; Cunha, R.A. Dual presynaptic control by ATP of glutamate release via facilitatory P2X1, P2X2/3, and P2X3 and inhibitory P2Y1, P2Y2, and/or P2Y4 receptors in the rat hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 6286–6295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Dias, L.; Lopes, C.R.; Gonçalves, F.Q.; Nunes, A.; Pochmann, D.; Machado, N.J.; Tomé, A.R.; Agostinho, P.; Cunha, R.A. Crosstalk between ATP-P2X7 and adenosine A2A receptors controlling neuroinflammation in rats subject to repeated restraint stress. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 639322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Cunha, R.A.; Johansson, B.; Constantino, M.D.; Sebastião, A.M.; Fredholm, B.B. Evidence for high-affinity binding sites for the adenosine A2A receptor agonist [3H]CGS21680 in the rat hippocampus and cerebral cortex that are different from striatal A2A receptors. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 1996, 353, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cunha, R.A.; Constantino, M.D.; Ribeiro, J.A. G protein coupling of CGS 21680 binding sites in the rat hippocampus and cortex is different from that of adenosine A1 and striatal A2A receptors. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 1999, 359, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Halldner, L.; Lopes, L.V.; Daré, E.; Lindström, K.; Johansson, B.; Ledent, C.; Cunha, R.A.; Fredholm, B.B. Binding of adenosine receptor ligands to brain of adenosine receptor knock-out mice: Evidence that CGS 21680 binds to A1 receptors in hippocampus. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 2004, 370, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Matos, M.; Shen, H.Y.; Augusto, E.; Wang, Y.; Wei, C.J.; Wang, Y.T.; Agostinho, P.; Boison, D.; Cunha, R.A.; Chen, J.F. Deletion of adenosine A2A receptors from astrocytes disrupts glutamate homeostasis leading to psychomotor and cognitive impairment: Relevance to schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry. 2015, 78, 763–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shen, H.Y.; Coelho, J.E.; Ohtsuka, N.; Canas, P.M.; Day, Y.J.; Huang, Q.Y.; Rebola, N.; Yu, L.; Boison, D.; Cunha, R.A.; et al. A critical role of the adenosine A2A receptor in extrastriatal neurons in modulating psychomotor activity as revealed by opposite phenotypes of striatum and forebrain A2A receptor knock-outs. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 2970–2975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Shen, H.Y.; Canas, P.M.; Garcia-Sanz, P.; Lan, J.Q.; Boison, D.; Moratalla, R.; Cunha, R.A.; Chen, J.F. Adenosine A2A receptors in striatal glutamatergic terminals and GABAergic neurons oppositely modulate psychostimulant action and DARPP-32 phosphorylation. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wei, C.J.; Augusto, E.; Gomes, C.A.; Singer, P.; Wang, Y.; Boison, D.; Cunha, R.A.; Yee, B.K.; Chen, J.F. Regulation of fear responses by striatal and extrastriatal adenosine A2A receptors in forebrain. Biol. Psychiatry. 2014, 75, 855–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wall, M.J.; Dale, N. Neuronal transporter and astrocytic ATP exocytosis underlie activity-dependent adenosine release in the hippocampus. J. Physiol. 2013, 591, 3853–3871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wu, Z.; Cui, Y.; Wang, H.; Wu, H.; Wan, Y.; Li, B.; Wang, L.; Pan, S.; Peng, W.; Dong, A.; et al. Neuronal activity-induced, equilibrative nucleoside transporter-dependent, somatodendritic adenosine release revealed by a GRAB sensor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2212387120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Badimon, A.; Strasburger, H.J.; Ayata, P.; Chen, X.; Nair, A.; Ikegami, A.; Hwang, P.; Chan, A.T.; Graves, S.M.; Uweru, J.O.; et al. Negative feedback control of neuronal activity by microglia. Nature 2020, 586, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. zur Nedden, S.; Hawley, S.; Pentland, N.; Hardie, D.G.; Doney, A.S.; Frenguelli, B.G. Intracellular ATP influences synaptic plasticity in area CA1 of rat hippocampus via metabolism to adenosine and activity-dependent activation of adenosine A1 receptors. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 6221–6234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Chen, Z.; Stockwell, J.; Cayabyab, F.S. Adenosine A1 receptor-mediated endocytosis of AMPA receptors contributes to impairments in long-term potentiation (LTP) in the middle-aged rat hippocampus. Neurochem. Res. 2016, 41, 1085–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. de Mendonça, A.; Ribeiro, J.A. Long-term potentiation observed upon blockade of adenosine A1 receptors in rat hippocampus is N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-dependent. Neurosci. Lett. 2000, 291, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Rex, C.S.; Kramár, E.A.; Colgin, L.L.; Lin, B.; Gall, C.M.; Lynch, G. Long-term potentiation is impaired in middle-aged rats: Regional specificity and reversal by adenosine receptor antagonists. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 5956–5966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Giménez-Llort, L.; Masino, S.A.; Diao, L.; Fernández-Teruel, A.; Tobeña, A.; Halldner, L.; Fredholm, B.B. Mice lacking the adenosine A1 receptor have normal spatial learning and plasticity in the CA1 region of the hippocampus, but they habituate more slowly. Synapse 2005, 57, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Klyuch, B.P.; Dale, N.; Wall, M.J. Deletion of ecto-5′-nucleotidase (CD73) reveals direct action potential-dependent adenosine release. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 3842–3847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Andiné, P.; Rudolphi, K.A.; Fredholm, B.B.; Hagberg, H. Effect of propentofylline (HWA 285) on extracellular purines and excitatory amino acids in CA1 of rat hippocampus during transient ischaemia. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1990, 100, 814–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chen, Y.; Graham, D.I.; Stone, T.W. Release of endogenous adenosine and its metabolites by the activation of NMDA receptors in the rat hippocampus in vivo. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1992, 106, 632–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Diógenes, M.J.; Neves-Tomé, R.; Fucile, S.; Martinello, K.; Scianni, M.; Theofilas, P.; Lopatár, J.; Ribeiro, J.A.; Maggi, L.; Frenguelli, B.G.; et al. Homeostatic control of synaptic activity by endogenous adenosine is mediated by adenosine kinase. Cereb. Cortex 2014, 24, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lee, S.T.; Venton, B.J. Regional variations of spontaneous, transient adenosine release in brain slices. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2018, 9, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Yamashiro, K.; Fujii, Y.; Maekawa, S.; Morita, M. Multiple pathways for elevating extracellular adenosine in the rat hippocampal CA1 region characterized by adenosine sensor cells. J. Neurochem. 2017, 140, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Pankratov, Y.; Lalo, U.; Verkhratsky, A.; North, R.A. Vesicular release of ATP at central synapses. Pflugers Arch. 2006, 452, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomolecules 13 00715 g001 550
Figure 1. Estimation of the endogenous extracellular levels of adenosine in hippocampal synapses show that the intensity- and frequency-dependent increase in adenosine reaches levels sufficient to block synaptic transmission at higher frequencies of stimulation. (A) Representative experiment in a mouse hippocampal slice, showing that increasing concentrations of exogenously added adenosine (Ado, 6–60 μM) caused an increased inhibition of hippocampal synaptic transmission, measured as a decrease in the slope of field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSP) recorded in the CA1 stratum radiatum upon stimulation of the afferent Schaffer collaterals with pulses delivered at 0.1 Hz. The effect of adenosine is essentially abolished by the selective A1R antagonist DPCPX (50 nM) and both DPCPX and adenosine deaminase (ADA, which convert extracellular adenosine into inosine) increase fEPSP responses, implying that endogenous extracellular adenosine tonically depresses hippocampal synaptic transmission. (B) The interpolation of ADA-mediated disinhibition on the curve of adenosine-mediated inhibition of synaptic transmission prompts an estimate of synaptic extracellular levels of adenosine of 8 μM. Data are mean ± SEM of n = 6. (C) The mean ± SEM values (n = 6) of the extracellular levels of adenosine, upon incubation of mouse hippocampal synaptosomes (∼1.2–1.4 mg protein/mL) during 5 min in the presence of increasing concentrations of K+ (10–60 mM), showing that there is an increase in adenosine outflow proportional to the intensity of potassium-induced synaptic depolarization. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.001 between indicated bars. (D) The effect of DPCPX on hippocampal synaptic transmission in Schaffer fibers-CA1 pyramid synapses is larger with increasing frequencies of stimulation, with pulses applied in groups of 10 with increasing frequencies from 1–100 Hz, with 10 min interval without stimulation between each group, first in the absence, then in the presence of 100 nM DPCPX. Data are mean ± SEM values (n = 4–6).
Figure 1. Estimation of the endogenous extracellular levels of adenosine in hippocampal synapses show that the intensity- and frequency-dependent increase in adenosine reaches levels sufficient to block synaptic transmission at higher frequencies of stimulation. (A) Representative experiment in a mouse hippocampal slice, showing that increasing concentrations of exogenously added adenosine (Ado, 6–60 μM) caused an increased inhibition of hippocampal synaptic transmission, measured as a decrease in the slope of field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSP) recorded in the CA1 stratum radiatum upon stimulation of the afferent Schaffer collaterals with pulses delivered at 0.1 Hz. The effect of adenosine is essentially abolished by the selective A1R antagonist DPCPX (50 nM) and both DPCPX and adenosine deaminase (ADA, which convert extracellular adenosine into inosine) increase fEPSP responses, implying that endogenous extracellular adenosine tonically depresses hippocampal synaptic transmission. (B) The interpolation of ADA-mediated disinhibition on the curve of adenosine-mediated inhibition of synaptic transmission prompts an estimate of synaptic extracellular levels of adenosine of 8 μM. Data are mean ± SEM of n = 6. (C) The mean ± SEM values (n = 6) of the extracellular levels of adenosine, upon incubation of mouse hippocampal synaptosomes (∼1.2–1.4 mg protein/mL) during 5 min in the presence of increasing concentrations of K+ (10–60 mM), showing that there is an increase in adenosine outflow proportional to the intensity of potassium-induced synaptic depolarization. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.001 between indicated bars. (D) The effect of DPCPX on hippocampal synaptic transmission in Schaffer fibers-CA1 pyramid synapses is larger with increasing frequencies of stimulation, with pulses applied in groups of 10 with increasing frequencies from 1–100 Hz, with 10 min interval without stimulation between each group, first in the absence, then in the presence of 100 nM DPCPX. Data are mean ± SEM values (n = 4–6).
Biomolecules 13 00715 g001
Biomolecules 13 00715 g002 550
Figure 2. The tonic activation of A2AR blunts the impact of the tonic activation of A1R to modify hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP). A supramaximal concentration of the A1R antagonist DPCPX (50 nM) did not significantly modify the amplitude of long-term potentiation (LTP) of field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSP) in Schaffer fibers-CA1 pyramid synapses of mouse hippocampal slices: the time course of fEPSP slope recordings (A) shows a sustained increase in fEPSP slope after delivering a high-frequency stimulation train (HFS: one train of 100 pulses at 100 Hz), which is not significantly different in the presence of 50 nM DPCPX (blue symbols) compared to its absence (black symbols), as quantified in (B). In contrast, the A2AR antagonist SCH58261 (50 nM) significantly decreased LTP magnitude (C,D). In the continuous presence of SCH58261 (50 nM), DPCPX (50 nM) was now able to significantly increase LTP amplitude (E,F). In contrast, in the continuous presence of 50 nM DPCPX, SCH58261 (50 nM) was still able to decrease LTP magnitude (G,H), albeit causing an inhibition lower than in the absence of DPCPX (D). Data are mean ± S.E.M. of 5–6. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.001, Student’s t test.
Figure 2. The tonic activation of A2AR blunts the impact of the tonic activation of A1R to modify hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP). A supramaximal concentration of the A1R antagonist DPCPX (50 nM) did not significantly modify the amplitude of long-term potentiation (LTP) of field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSP) in Schaffer fibers-CA1 pyramid synapses of mouse hippocampal slices: the time course of fEPSP slope recordings (A) shows a sustained increase in fEPSP slope after delivering a high-frequency stimulation train (HFS: one train of 100 pulses at 100 Hz), which is not significantly different in the presence of 50 nM DPCPX (blue symbols) compared to its absence (black symbols), as quantified in (B). In contrast, the A2AR antagonist SCH58261 (50 nM) significantly decreased LTP magnitude (C,D). In the continuous presence of SCH58261 (50 nM), DPCPX (50 nM) was now able to significantly increase LTP amplitude (E,F). In contrast, in the continuous presence of 50 nM DPCPX, SCH58261 (50 nM) was still able to decrease LTP magnitude (G,H), albeit causing an inhibition lower than in the absence of DPCPX (D). Data are mean ± S.E.M. of 5–6. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.001, Student’s t test.
Biomolecules 13 00715 g002
Biomolecules 13 00715 g003 550
Figure 3. The activation of A2AR attenuates the ability of A1R to control hippocampal synaptic transmission. (A,B) A supramaximal concentration of the A1R antagonist DPCPX (50 nM) increased basal hippocampal synaptic transmission measured as field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSP) in Schaffer fibers-CA1 pyramid synapses of mouse hippocampal slices, irrespective of the blockade of A2AR with the selective antagonist SCH58261 (50 nM). (C) The A2AR agonist, CGS21680 (30 nM), attenuated the ability of the selective A1R agonist, CPA (6–60 nM), to inhibit basal hippocampal synaptic transmission in a manner prevented by the A2AR antagonist, SCH58261 (50 nM) (D). (E) CPA (30 nM) inhibited hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) in CA1 synapses triggered by high-frequency stimulation train (HFS: one train of 100 pulses at 100 Hz), an inhibitory effect still present but attenuated by blocking A2AR with SCH58261 (50 nM) (F), as quantified in (G). * p < 0.01, Student’s t test.
Figure 3. The activation of A2AR attenuates the ability of A1R to control hippocampal synaptic transmission. (A,B) A supramaximal concentration of the A1R antagonist DPCPX (50 nM) increased basal hippocampal synaptic transmission measured as field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSP) in Schaffer fibers-CA1 pyramid synapses of mouse hippocampal slices, irrespective of the blockade of A2AR with the selective antagonist SCH58261 (50 nM). (C) The A2AR agonist, CGS21680 (30 nM), attenuated the ability of the selective A1R agonist, CPA (6–60 nM), to inhibit basal hippocampal synaptic transmission in a manner prevented by the A2AR antagonist, SCH58261 (50 nM) (D). (E) CPA (30 nM) inhibited hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) in CA1 synapses triggered by high-frequency stimulation train (HFS: one train of 100 pulses at 100 Hz), an inhibitory effect still present but attenuated by blocking A2AR with SCH58261 (50 nM) (F), as quantified in (G). * p < 0.01, Student’s t test.
Biomolecules 13 00715 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lopes, C.R.; Gonçalves, F.Q.; Olaio, S.; Tomé, A.R.; Cunha, R.A.; Lopes, J.P. Adenosine A2A Receptors Shut Down Adenosine A1 Receptor-Mediated Presynaptic Inhibition to Promote Implementation of Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13040715

AMA Style

Lopes CR, Gonçalves FQ, Olaio S, Tomé AR, Cunha RA, Lopes JP. Adenosine A2A Receptors Shut Down Adenosine A1 Receptor-Mediated Presynaptic Inhibition to Promote Implementation of Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation. Biomolecules. 2023; 13(4):715. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13040715

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lopes, Cátia R., Francisco Q. Gonçalves, Simão Olaio, Angelo R. Tomé, Rodrigo A. Cunha, and João Pedro Lopes. 2023. "Adenosine A2A Receptors Shut Down Adenosine A1 Receptor-Mediated Presynaptic Inhibition to Promote Implementation of Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation" Biomolecules 13, no. 4: 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13040715

APA Style

Lopes, C. R., Gonçalves, F. Q., Olaio, S., Tomé, A. R., Cunha, R. A., & Lopes, J. P. (2023). Adenosine A2A Receptors Shut Down Adenosine A1 Receptor-Mediated Presynaptic Inhibition to Promote Implementation of Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation. Biomolecules, 13(4), 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13040715

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop