Next Article in Journal
3D Organoids for Regenerative Endodontics
Previous Article in Journal
RPS27a and RPL40, Which Are Produced as Ubiquitin Fusion Proteins, Are Not Essential for p53 Signalling
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 13
Issue 6
10.3390/biom13060899
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pharmacological Inhibition of Gasdermin D Suppresses Angiotensin II-Induced Experimental Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

by
Jia Guo
1,2,*,
Jinyun Shi
1,
Min Qin
1,
Yan Wang
3,
Zhidong Li
4,
Takahiro Shoji
2,
Toru Ikezoe
2,
Yingbin Ge
5 and
Baohui Xu
2
1
Center for Hypertension Care, Shanxi Medical University First Hospital, Taiyuan 030001, China
2
Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
3
Institute of Medical Innovation and Research, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
4
Department of Pharmacology, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
5
Department of Physiology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2023, 13(6), 899; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13060899
Submission received: 10 April 2023 / Revised: 8 May 2023 / Accepted: 11 May 2023 / Published: 28 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Medicine)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Gasdermin D, a molecule downstream of the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor family pyrin domain containing inflammasome, forms the membrane pore for the secretion of interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18, and also mediates pyroptosis. This study was to explore the influence of treatment with disulfiram, a small molecule inhibitor to gasdermin D, on the formation and progression of experimental abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Methods: AAAs were induced in 10-week-old male apolipoprotein E deficient mice by subcutaneous infusion of angiotensin II (1000 ng/min/kg body weight) for 28 days via osmotic minipumps. Three days prior to angiotensin II infusion, disulfiram (50 mg/kg) or an equal volume of saline as the vehicle control was administered daily via oral gavage. The influence on experimental AAAs was analyzed by serial measurements of aortic diameters via ultrasonography, grading AAA severity and histopathology at sacrifice. Serum IL-1β and IL-18 levels, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and triglyceride were also measured. Additional experiments assayed the influences on the cell viability and IL-1β secretion of in vitro activated macrophages. Results: Disulfiram significantly reduced the enlargement, incidence, and severity of angiotensin II-induced experimental AAAs with attenuation of medial elastin breaks, mural macrophage accumulation, and systolic blood pressure. The AAA suppression was also associated with reduced systemic levels of IL-1β but not IL-18. However, disulfiram treatment had no impact on body weight gain and lipid levels in aneurysmal mice. Additionally, disulfiram treatment also markedly reduced the secretion of IL-1β from activated macrophages with a limited effect on cell viability in vitro. Conclusions: Gasdermin D inhibition by disulfiram attenuated angiotensin II-induced experimental AAAs with reduced systemic IL-1β levels and in vitro activated macrophage IL-1β secretion. Our study suggests that pharmacological gasdermin D inhibition may have translational potential for limiting clinical AAA progression.

1. Introduction

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening chronic disease characterized by progressive dilation of the abdominal aorta, particularly the infrarenal aorta, to a diameter of more than 3.0 cm [1]. AAAs are generally asymptomatic and identified accidentally or through an AAA screening program. Advanced age, male sex, cigarette smoking, white race, and cardiovascular morbidity increase the risk of AAA, whereas female sex, black race, and diabetes reduce the risk of AAA [2]. Surgical (open and endovascular) repair remains the sole treatment for AAA disease. However, only a small portion of AAA patients meet current elective surgical repair criteria (aneurysm diameters of >5.5 cm and 4.5 cm in men and women, respectively) [3,4], whereas a large number of patients with an aneurysm diameter below the surgical repair threshold are at risk of unpredicted lethal rupture. Therefore, innovating nonsurgical pharmacological therapeutic options are needed to limit small AAA progression and ultimately to reduce mortality due to unpredicted premature AAA rupture in patients who do not meet surgical criteria [5].
Inflammation critically mediates AAA pathogenesis by aortic leukocyte accumulation, proteolysis via matrix metalloproteinases, imbalanced pro-and anti-inflammatory cytokines, elevated renin-angiotensin activity, and pathogenic mural angiogenesis [6,7,8,9,10,11]. For example, genetic or pharmacological inhibition of IL-1β and its receptor suppressed experimental AAAs induced by the intra-aortic infusion or aortic wall topical painting of porcine pancreatic elastase as well as Kawasaki disease-associated experimental AAAs [12,13,14,15,16,17]. Genetic ablation of IL-18 or its receptor also mitigated angiotensin II (Ang II)-induced AAAs in apolipoprotein E (ApoE) deficient mice [18,19]. Inflammasomes are a large multimolecular complexes and are critical for inflammatory responses [20]. Inflammasomes are activated to generate active caspases, which cleave the precursors of interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18 to the corresponding functional mature forms [20,21]. The nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome is the best characterized [22,23]. Almost, if not all, genetically or pharmacologically targeted individual NLRP3 components have been shown to suppress or even prevent experimental AAAs in distinct rodent AAA models [13,16,17,24,25].
Gasdermin D is a molecule downstream of the NLRP3 inflammasome [26,27,28]. Following NLRP3 inflammasome activation, active caspase 1 cleaves gasdermin D into the C- and N-terminals, the latter forming cell membrane pores for the secretion of mature proinflammatory IL-1β and IL-18, whereas excessive pore formation by cleaved gasdermin D leads to cell death (known as pyroptosis) [26,27,29,30,31,32]. Recent studies have shown the pathogenic importance of gasdermin D in the pathogenesis of several vascular disorders. For example, genetic deficiency or AAV5-mediated suppression of gasdermin D attenuated experimental atherosclerosis disorders [33,34,35,36]. Gasdermin D deficiency attenuated experimental ischemic stroke [37,38,39]. Cardiomyocyte-specific gasdermin D ablation and siRNA gasdermin suppression, respectively, also abrogated transverse aortic construction- and Ang II-induced cardiac hypertrophy disorders [40,41]. Additionally, gasdermin D deficiency also attenuated myocardial reperfusion injury in mice [38]. However, the role that gasdermin D plays in AAAs has not been well investigated.
Given the importance of NLPR3 in AAA pathogenesis and gasdermin D as an executive molecule in inflammasomes, we hypothesized that blocking gasdermin D activity inhibits experimental AAAs. A drug in clinical use, disulfiram, has been shown to block the pore formation mediated by the cleaved gasdermin D N-terminal and thus prevents the release of IL-1β and IL-18 [42]. Thus, the present study investigated the influence of the gasdermin D inhibitor disulfiram on Ang II-induced experimental AAAs via noninvasive ultrasound imaging, histopathology, cytokine assays, and macrophages in vitro. We found that gasdermin D inhibition by disulfiram effectively attenuated experimental AAA formation and progression in association with reduced systemic and macrophage-derived IL-1β levels without an effect on lipid levels.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Induction and Treatment of Experimental AAAs

Ten- to twelve-week-old male ApoE deficient mice on C57BL/6 genetic background were purchased from Nanjing Junke Bioengineering Ltd., Nanjing, Jiangsu, China and used throughout this study. The use and care of experimental animals in this study were approved by Shanxi Medical University Animal Research Committee and complied with the University Laboratory Animal Research Guidelines (Taiyuan, Shanxi, China). Mice were housed at Shanxi Medical University Research Animal Facility with free access to standard mouse chow and drinking water at a constant temperature of 22 ± 2 °C and humidity of 60–65% with a 12 h dark/light cycle. Mice were monitored daily, and body weight was measured weekly.
AAAs were induced by subcutaneous infusion of Ang II, as previously reported [8,11,43,44]. Briefly, mice were anesthetized by inhalation of 3% isoflurane and oxygen. Osmotic pumps (Model 2004, Durect Corporation, CA, USA) were surgically implanted into the dorsal subcutaneous pocket to deliver human recombinant Ang II (1000 ng/kg/min, catalog number ab120183, abcam, Waltham, MA, USA) for 28 days. Three days prior to Ang II infusion, gasdermin D inhibitor disulfiram (50 mg/kg/day, catalog number A0322A, Meilunbio, Dalian, Liaoning, China) or an equal value of vehicle (saline) was orally given to the mice for a total of 30 days. Disulfiram at 50 mg/kg/day, effectively suppressing gasdermin D activity in the mouse sepsis model, was within the clinical dose range (500 mg and 250 mg for initiating and subsequently maintaining dose, respectively, for people with a body weight of 60 kg) at allometric scale (http://clymer.altervista.org/minor/allometry.html (accessed on 15 May 2023) [42].

2.2. Ultrasound Imaging of Experimental AAAs In Vivo

Experimental AAAs were monitored by serial measurements of maximal suprarenal aortic luminal diameters using the S-sharp prospect 3.0 small animal ultrasound system (S-Sharp Corporation, Nepa Gene Co., Ltd., Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan). Time points for diameter measurements included the baseline level (day 0) prior to and days 7, 14, 21, and 28 following Ang II infusion [8,11]. All measurements were conducted by two investigators blinded to treatment group assignment. An AAA was defined by the presence of aortic dissection imaged via ultrasonography, a 50% increase in aortic diameter over the baseline, or death due to AAA rupture [8,11].

2.3. Measurement of Blood Pressure

Blood pressure was determined using a noninvasive tail-cuff monitoring system, Mode BP-2010A, Softron Biotechnology, Haidian, Beijing, China [43]. The mouse was placed in a temperature-controlled restrainer. Fifteen minutes thereafter, blood pressure and heart rate were recorded for five consecutive measurements and averaged. All measurements were performed between 8.0 am and 10.0 am for the baseline level and day 28 after Ang II infusion.

2.4. AAA Severity Grading

Twenty-eight days after Ang II infusion, mice were sacrificed by overdose isoflurane inhalation, perfused with phosphate-buffered saline via the left ventricle. The entire aorta was then isolated, and AAA severity in suprarenal aorta was scored as grade 0 to grade V, as previously reported [11,45]. Individual grades were grade 0: no recognizable aortic dilation; grade I: recognizable aortic dilation without thrombus; grade II: aortic dilation with recognizable thrombus; grade III: pronounced bulbous form of aneurysm with thrombus; grade IV: multiple AAAs with thrombus; and grade V: death due to AAA rupture.

2.5. Determination of Serum Triglycerides and Total Cholesterol Levels

Mice were anesthetized by isoflurane inhalation after the last aortic diameter measurement. Peripheral blood was obtained by retro-orbital bleeding. The serum was prepared by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 30 min. Serum specimens were isolated and stored at −20 °C until analysis. Serum lipid profiles including total cholesterol and triglyceride were measured using an automatic chemistry analyzer, Servicebio, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

2.6. Aortic Histological Analyses

Twenty-eight days following Ang II infusion, mice were sacrificed by overdose inhalation of isoflurane. Suprarenal aorta was dissected, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned (6 mm) for all histological analyses. Medial elastin laminae were assessed via Elastica van Gieson (EVG) stain [8,46]. Following deparaffinization, rehydration, and antigen retiral, sections were stained with an antibody against CD68 (macrophages) using the standard immunohistochemistry procedure and 3,3′-diaminobenzidine as the peroxidase substrate [10,47,48]. Immunostained sections were further counterstained with hematoxylin, mounted, and coverslipped. Images for all staining were acquired on an Olympus microscope equipped with a digital camera.

2.7. Culture and Treatment of Macrophages In Vitro

Mouse macrophage cell line RAW264.7 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA. Macrophages were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin and streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 and used within 10 passages. Cells were activated with lipopolysaccharide (100 ng/mL, Cat#: L2880, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 24 h followed by additional 24 h incubation with vehicle, Ang II (100 nM) and/or disulfiram (25 mM) [11,42,49]. At the end of the experiments, cells were subjected to viability assessment, and culture supernatants were harvested to determine IL-1b release.

2.8. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISA)

ELISA assays were used to determine cytokine levels in serum, culture cell supernatants, and cell viability using commercially available kits and performed according to individual manufacturer’s instructions. These were ELISA kits for mouse IL-1β and IL1-8 (catalog # JL18442 and JL20253, J&L Biological, Baoshan, Shanghai, China) and CCK8 cell counting (Dojindo Laboratories, Chaoyang, Beijing, China).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Software Prism version 9.5.1, San Diego, CA, USA. Normality and outlier data for all continuous variables were evaluated using ROUT and Shapiro–Wilk tests, respectively. Data for continuous variables with normal distribution were thus presented as mean and standard deviation. Two-way ANOVA followed by two group comparison or Student’s t-test was used to test the difference for normally distributed data. All non-normally distributed data were presented as media and interquartile (25th and 75th), and statistical difference was tested using a nonparametric Mann–Whitney test. Chi-square test was employed to test the difference for the AAA severity score distribution between two treatment groups. The difference in cumulative AAA incidence and mortality between the two groups was tested using the log-rank test. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Disulfiram Treatment Suppresses the Formation and Progression of Experimental AAAs

To evaluate the influence of gasdermin D inhibition on experimental AAAs, Ang II was subcutaneously delivered to male Apo E−/− mice (1000 ng/min/kg body weight) for 28 days. Gasdermin D inhibitor disulfiram (50 mg/kg) or an equal value of vehicle (saline) was administrated to the mice via oral gavage for 30 days. Maximal suprarenal aortic diameters were measured using a small animal ultrasonography prior to and weekly after Ang II infusion. As shown in Figure 1A,B, no difference was observed in the baseline suprarenal aortic diameter between the vehicle (mean and SD: 1.03 ± 0.04 mm) and disulfiram (1.01 ± 0.04 mm) treated groups. In vehicle-treated mice, Ang II infusion induced a time-dependent expansion in the suprarenal aortic diameter as compared to the baseline level. In contrast, disulfiram treatment dramatically attenuated Ang II infusion-induced aortic diameter enlargement. Aortic diameters were significantly smaller in disulfiram- than those in vehicle-, treated mice on day 21 (1.47 ± 0.04 mm and 1.22 ± 0.04 mm for vehicle and disulfiram treatments, respectively, p < 0.01) and day 28 (1.58 ± 0.04 mm and 1.25 ± 0.04 mm for vehicle and disulfiram, respectively, p < 0.01) after Ang II infusion.
AAAs, defined by the presence of aortic dissection noticed by ultrasonography, a 50% or more increase in aortic diameter over the baseline, or death due to AAA rupture, were observed in 10 out of 13 mice (77%) within 28 days following Ang II infusion (Figure 1C). In contrast, AAAs were noted in only 2 out of 13 mice (15%) in disulfiram-treated mice. However, there was no difference in mortality due to AAA rupture between the two treatment groups (Figure 1D). One mouse died accidently in the disulfiram treatment group. Death due to AAA rupture was noted in two mice (days 3 and 6) and one mouse (day 18) in the vehicle and disulfiram treatment groups, respectively, following Ang II infusion. Altogether, these results indicate that pharmacological inhibition of gasdermin D by disulfiram suppresses experimental AAA formation and progression.

3.2. Disulfiram Treatment Ameliorates Experimental AAA Severity

At sacrifice, we further assessed the influence of disulfiram treatment on AAA severity as a complementary approach to ultrasound imaging. AAA severity was scored according to the presence or absence of aortic dilation and thrombus as well as the shape and number of AAAs. As shown in Figure 2A,B, AAAs were scored as grade V (death due to AAA rupture) in two mice, grade IV in one mouse, grade II in three mice, grade II in five mice, and grade I in two mice in the vehicle treatment group. In contrast, AAAs were scored as grade I in eleven mice, grade II in one mouse, and grade V in one mouse in the disulfiram treatment group. Additionally, the average AAA severity score was significantly lower in disulfiram- than in vehicle-treated mice (Figure 2C). Thus, inhibiting gasdermin D by disulfiram reduces experimental AAA severity.

3.3. Disulfiram Treatment Attenuates Aortic Inflammation in Experimental AAAs

Further, histopathological analyses were performed to evaluate the influence of disulfiram treatment on key aneurysmal pathologies (Figure 3). As illustrated in H&E stain, severe inflammation was seen in the vehicle- but not in the disulfiram-treated Ang II-infused mice. Medial elastin breaks were readily observed in aortas of the vehicle- as compared to the disulfiram-treated mice. Similarly, macrophages, as indicated by CD68 antibody staining, were apparently noted in aortas from vehicle-treated mice. In contrast, macrophages were rarely seen in aortas from disulfiram-treated mice. Thus, inhibition of gasdermin D by disulfiram suppressed experimental AAAs in conjunction with attenuated aortic inflammation.

3.4. Disulfiram Treatment Reduces the Systemic Levels of IL-1β Not IL-18 in Experimental AAAs

Cleavage of gasdermin D by active caspase 1 generates N-terminal, which forms the cell membrane core required for the section of mature IL-1β and IL-18. Given the importance of IL-1β and IL-18 in AAA pathogenesis, we examined whether attenuation of experimental AAAs by gasdermin D inhibitor disulfiram is associated with reduced systemic levels of IL-1β and IL-18. As seen in Figure 4A, serum IL-1β levels were markedly and significantly reduced in disulfiram- as compared to vehicle-treated Ang II-infused mice (p < 0.01). Serum IL-1β levels were 547.7 ± 231.8 pg/mL and 272.1 ± 128.0 pg/mL in vehicle and disulfiram treatment groups, respectively, representing 50% reduction following disulfiram treatment. Six and eight mice among twelve and nine mice of vehicle- and disulfiram-treated mice, respectively, had IL-1β levels below the mean levels seen in vehicle treatment group. However, serum IL-18 levels did not differ between vehicle (83.9 ± 43.0 pg/mL) and disulfiram (87.4 ± 58.3 pg/mL) treatment groups. Similarly, 33% and 40% of mice in the vehicle and disulfiram treatment groups, respectively, had serum IL-18 levels over the mean IL-18 level noted in the vehicle treatment group (Figure 4B). These results suggest that reduction of systemic IL-1β levels may contribute to disulfiram-mediated experimental AAA attenuation.

3.5. Disulfiram Treatment Slightly Lowers Angiotensin II-Induced Increase in Systolic Blood Pressure in Experimental AAAs

Systolic blood pressure was measured at the baseline levels as well as 28 days after Ang II infusion via the noninvasive tail cuff method (Figure 5A). No difference in baseline systolic blood pressure was found between the vehicle (105.6 ± 6.4 mm Hg) and disulfiram (105.7 ± 8.4 mm Hg) treatment groups (Figure 5A). Following subcutaneous Ang II infusion for 28 days, the systolic blood pressure was significantly elevated in both treatment groups as compared to the corresponding baseline level (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 for disulfiram and vehicle treatments, respectively). Unexpectedly, systolic blood pressure measured on day 28 was slightly but significantly lower in the disulfiram (123.9 ± 4.9 mm Hg) than that in the vehicle (144.6 ± 6.5 mm Hg)-treated group (p < 0.05). Additionally, Ang II infusion (450.3 ± 66.1 and 452.0 ± 79.5 beats/minute for vehicle and disulfiram treatments, respectively) also mildly but significantly reduced heart rate as compared to respective baseline levels (538.5 ± 58.1 and 557.2 ± 30.1 beats/minute for vehicle and disulfiram treatments, respectively) (p < 0.01) regardless of treatment with vehicle or disulfiram (Figure 5B). Heart rate on day 28, however, did not differ between vehicle and disulfiram treatment groups.

3.6. Disulfiram Treatment Affects Neither Body Weight Gain Nor Lipid Levels in Experimental AAAs

We assessed whether the AAA suppression by disulfiram is associated with alterations in body weight gain and lipid levels in experimental AAA mice. As shown in Figure 5C, there was no difference in baseline body weight between the vehicle (21.9 ± 1.3 g) and disulfiram (22.1 ± 1.2 g) treatment groups. Disulfiram treatment did not substantially reduce the gain of body weight, which were measured as 25.2 ± 1.3 g and 24.6 ± 1.4 g for vehicle and disulfiram treatments, respectively, 28 days after Ang II infusion. Additionally, no difference was found in serum total cholesterol levels between vehicle (627.6 ± 17.8 mg/dL) and disulfiram (597.9 ± 18.2 mg/dL) treatment groups (Figure 5D,E). Similarly, disulfiram treatment did not impact serum triglyceride as compared to vehicle treatment (114.9 ± 3.3 mg/dL and 106.2 ± 4.0 mg/dL in vehicle and disulfiram treatments, respectively) (Figure 5D,E). Altogether, these results suggest that the suppression of experimental AAAs by disulfiram treatment was independent of body weight gain or hyperlipidemic conditions.

3.7. Disulfiram Treatment Suppresses IL-1β Release by Macrophages In Vitro

Gasdermin D acts as a pore-forming protein and contributes to inflammasome-mediated secretion of IL-1β and IL-18 as well as cellular pyroptosis. Macrophages outnumber other inflammatory cells in an aneurysmal aorta and critically mediate AAA pathogenesis via the production of cytokines and other mediators. We therefore tested whether disulfiram influences macrophage viability and IL-1β secretion following in vitro LPS-mediated activation. In CCK8 assays (Figure 6A), disulfiram-treated macrophage viability was 82% (SD: 0.0%) of that seen in vehicle treatment (theoretical value: 100%) in the absence of Ang II following LPS-mediated activation. Such an effect was, however, not observed in the presence of Ang II (93.3 ± 17.6% of vehicle treatment). These data suggest that disulfiram had limited effect on macrophage viability.
As shown in Figure 6B, supernatant IL-1β concentration, as measured by ELISA, was almost identical in the absence (564.7 ± 25.7 pg/mL) or presence (562.0 ± 34.4 pg/mL) of Ang II in LPS-activated macrophages. In contrast, disulfiram treatment significantly reduced supernatant IL-1β concentration regardless of the presence or absence of Ang II (p < 0.01 compared to vehicle treatment). Although IL-1β concentration was lower in cotreatment with disulfiram and Ang II (310.0 ± 11.1 pg/mL) than that in treatment with disulfiram alone (384.0 ± 57.3 pg/mL), this difference was not statistically significant. These results confirmed that gasdermin D inhibitor disulfiram suppressed IL-1β secretion by macrophages.

4. Discussion

In the present study, treatment with gasdermin inhibitor disulfiram reduced aneurysmal aortic diameter enlargement, lowered AAA incidence, and ameliorated aneurysm severity in ApoE deficient mice following Ang II infusion. Disulfiram treatment also reduced systemic (serum) levels of IL-1β but not IL-18 in vivo as well as IL-1β release from LPS-activated macrophages in vitro. While disulfiram treatment slightly lowered systolic blood pressure, no remarkable influences were noted for hypercholesterolemia and body weight gain. Nevertheless, our findings indicate that gasdermin D inhibition by disulfiram attenuates Ang II-induced experimental AAAs.
Two recent studies have suggested the importance of gasdermin D in AAA pathogenesis using genetically modified animals. For instance, hyperlipidemic mice deficient for gasdermin D were protected against aortic rupture resulting from Ang II infusion (hyperlipidemia induced by inoculating adeno-associated virus encoding a human proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 gain-of-function of mutation (D377Y) or long-term feeding lysyl oxidase inhibitor β-aminopropionitrile [50]). Smooth muscle cell-specific deletion of gasdermin D also attenuated aneurysm diameter expansion and reduced AAA incidence in experimental AAAs created by subcutaneous Ang II infusion or topical application of elastase to aortic adventitia [51]. However, AAA suppression caused by smooth muscle cell-specific gasdermin D deficiency modified the phenotype of smooth muscle cells due to reduced endoplasmic reticulum stress and production of the ornithine decarboxylase-catalyzed metabolite putrescine, but not accompanied by smooth muscle cell pyroptosis [51]. Altogether, these previous studies suggest that gasdermin D may be a potential therapeutic target for treating AAA disease.
Highly similar to the experimental construct utilized in the present study, disulfiram treatment has been shown to reduce aneurysmal diameter, aortic collagen, and elastin fragmentation in ApoE deficient mice following Ang II infusion [52]. Unexpectedly, disulfiram treatment also downregulated Ang II-induced protein expression for NLRP3, ACS, caspase 1, IL-1β, IL-18, and gasdermin D in smooth muscle cells in vitro, which is not consistent with the hypothesis that disulfiram inhibits gasdermin D activity by interrupting pore formation [42]. No data were provided on whether disulfiram treatment influences active/cleaved levels of caspase 1, IL-1β, IL-18, and gasdermin D or directly reduces smooth muscle cell pyroptosis (either functional activity and imaging excessive pore formation). Additionally, it was also unclear from this previous study whether disulfiram treatment affected systemic levels and the ability of macrophages to secrete, IL-1β and IL-18. Despite these limitations, the authors concluded that disulfiram suppressed experimental AAAs by ameliorating smooth muscle cell pyroptosis. In addition to the attenuation of AAA progression and severity by disulfiram, the present study provides complementary evidence that disulfiram treatment reduced the systemic (serum) levels of IL-1β, LPS-stimulated macrophage IL-1β secretion, and slightly increased activated macrophage death. Nevertheless, the present study together with the previous study support the conclusion that pharmacological inhibition of gasdermin D attenuates experimental AAAs.
Gasdermin D consists of a 31 kDa N-terminus and 22 kDa C-terminus linked by a peptide. Active caspase 1 and caspases 4, 5, and 11 in canonical and noncanonical pathways, respectively, specifically cleave the gasdermin D linker at D275 [21,53,54]. The resultant N-terminus forms approximately 27 monomers and assembles into a transmembrane pore with an inner diameter of 18 nm, which is either required for the release of active forms of IL-1β and IL-18, or leads to host cell lysis (known as pyroptosis) [55,56]. Genetic deficiency, or pharmacological inhibition of IL-1β, IL-18 or their receptors, has been demonstrated to suppress experimental AAAs in distinct AAA models [12,13,14,15,16,18]. In accordance with the pathogenic significance of IL-1β in AAAs, systemic IL-1β levels, as measured by serum IL-1β, were significantly reduced in disulfiram- as compared to vehicle-treated Ang II-infused ApoE deficient mice. While average serum IL-18 levels were slightly decreased, no statistical difference was found between the two treatment groups. These results suggest that reduced systemic IL-1β levels may be partially attributed to impaired release due to disulfiram-attenuated gasdermin D activity. In our further in vitro experiments, disulfiram treatment markedly reduced IL-1β secretion by LPS-activated mouse macrophages while slightly reducing cell viability as measured by CCK8 assay. Consistent with our findings, disulfiram has been shown to attenuate IL-1β secretion by acute monocytic leukemia patient-derived human monocytes following LPS priming in vitro [42,57,58]. Altogether, our findings suggest that AAA suppression by the gasdermin D inhibitor disulfiram may be mediated largely by damping macrophage IL-1β secretion with a minor contribution from macrophage pyroptosis.
Disulfiram treatment slightly but significantly lowered systolic blood pressure in Ang II-infused, ApoE deficient mice. Consistent with the present study, the short- or long-term disulfiram treatment has been reported to slightly or moderately lower systolic blood pressure in people and rodents [59,60,61,62,63,64,65]. Thus, the question is whether reduced blood pressure played a role in AAA attenuation by disulfiram. In epidemiological studies, hypertension or high blood pressure was associated with a mild increase in AAA risk in retrospective but not prospective studies [66,67]. Neither hypertension nor pharmacologically managing blood pressure modulated the clinical AAA enlargement rate [68,69,70,71]. In experimental studies, several classes of blood pressure-lowering drugs, including inhibitors to Ang II type 1 receptor, Ang-converting enzyme, calcium channel, and β-adrenergic receptor, have been shown to suppress experimental AAAs [9,43,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80]. However, lowering blood pressure by endothelin 1 receptor antagonist (bosentan) or hydralazine failed to inhibit experimental AAAs in ApoE deficient mice induced by Ang II infusion [43,81]. Additionally, increasing blood pressure by phenylephrine also did not counteract AAA suppression by calcium channel blocker diltiazem [76]. Based on these published studies, it seems unlikely that the systolic blood pressure reduction observed in our study contributed to disulfiram-mediated AAA suppression.
High levels of total cholesterol, but not triglyceride, are associated with increased risk for clinical AAAs [82,83]. Hypercholesterolemia, obesity, or blocking transforming growth factor β1 activity is required for the successful induction of experimental AAAs by Ang II infusion, but not elastase infusion [44,84,85,86,87]. However, we found that treatment with disulfiram for 30 days did not alter serum levels of cholesterol and triglycerides. Additionally, loss of body weight attenuated AAAs in high-fat diet fed normolipidemic mice following Ang II infusion [88]. In the present study, no significant reduction in body weight was observed in disulfiram- as compared to vehicle-treated Ang II-infused ApoE deficient mice. Thus, AAA suppression by disulfiram treatment was independent of either lipid levels or body weight gain.
Disulfiram (Antabuse) is an aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitor approved for treating alcohol dependence with well documented clinical safety (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459340/ (accessed on 15 May 2023). Many clinical trials have been completed or are ongoing to test the therapeutic efficacy of disulfiram in other medical conditions, including infectious disease, retina degeneration, and malignant tumors (ClinicalTrials.gov (accessed on 15 May 2023). Additional mechanistically distinct small molecule gasdermin D inhibitors have also been reported [89,90,91]. Thus, regardless of the mechanisms by which disulfiram attenuated experimental AAAs, our findings together with those from other recent studies suggest that pharmacologically inhibiting gasdermin D may have the translational application for limiting clinical AAA progression.
We focused on the pharmacological inhibition efficacy of disulfiram treatment on experimental AAAs, thus our study has limitations. First, we did not assess whether gasdermin D was activated in aneurysmal lesion. However, in the study conducted by Gao and colleagues, the cleaved N-terminal of gasdermin D, an indicator for gasdermin D activation, was substantially increased in clinical and experimental AAA specimens [51]. Second, due to the limited aortic tissue available, we were unable to examine whether full gasdermin D was cleaved in aneurysmal aorta following disulfiram treatment. Third, the present study only applied a single AAA model and one clinically relevant disulfiram dose to test the preventive influence on experimental AAAs. For better translational application, further studies should validate whether disulfiram treatment is effective in mitigating the progression of existing AAAs in alternative AAA models with drug dose range design.
The findings that have emerged from the present and previous studies [50,51,52] led us to propose a working model that gasdermin D contributes to experimental AAA pathogenesis (Figure 7). In AAAs, either canonical or noncanonical inflammasome activation cleaves procaspases 1, 4, 5, 7, and 11 to active forms [16,52]. Certain viral proteinases also activate procaspases [92,93]. Then, active caspases cleave gasdermin D to the N- and C-terminals (gasdermin D activation). The N-terminal forms cell membrane pores which either promote the secretion of proaneurysmal IL-1β or release various types of proaneurysmal mediators due to cell death (pyroptosis). Additionally, gasdermin D activation also results in smooth muscle cell (SMC) phenotype switching, namely from contractible towards secretory SMCs that contribute to AAA pathogenesis by producing proinflammatory mediators in a pore-independent ways. Disulfiram, a specific gasdermin D inhibitor, mediates AAA suppression in part by inhibiting gasdermin D cleavage, which consequently diminishes the release of proaneurysmal mediators from macrophages and secretory SMCs in pore-dependent and/or -independent mechanisms.

5. Conclusions

Pharmacological inhibition of gasdermin D by disulfiram suppresses angiotensin II-induced experimental AAAs. Our study, together with previous reports, suggest that disulfiram or alternative small molecule inhibitors to gasdermin D may hold translational value for nonsurgical management of clinical AAA enlargement.

Author Contributions

Study design: J.G., J.S., Y.G., Y.W. and B.X.; data collection and analysis: J.S., J.G., Y.G., M.Q., Y.W., Z.L. and M.Q.; data interpretation: J.G., J.S., Y.G., Z.L., M.Q., T.S., T.I., Y.W. and B.X.; key reagents: Y.G. and Y.W.; visualization: J.S., J.G., Y.G., Z.L., B.X. and Y.W.; manuscript writing: J.G., J.S., Y.W. and B.X.; critical reviewing and approving manuscript contents and submission: all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers: 81600256 and 82001248), Abroad Return Scholar Fund of Shanxi Province (grant number 2021-159), and Central Funds Guiding the Local Science and Technology Development (grant number Jincaijiao-2020165-Z135050009017).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Animal use, care, and experimental procedures in this study were approved by Shanxi Medical University Animal Research Committee.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data were included within this article.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ronald L. Dalman for his critical reading of and comments on this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

These authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviation

AAA: abdominal aortic aneurysm; Ang: angiotensin; ApoE: apolipoprotein E; ACS: apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD; EVG: elastic van Gieson: ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; IL: interleukin; NLRP3: nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3; SD: standard deviation.

References

  1. Calgi, M.P.; McNeil, J.S. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (Etiology, Epidemiology, and Natural History). Anesthesiol. Clin. 2022, 40, 657–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lederle, F.A.; Johnson, G.R.; Wilson, S.E.; Chute, E.P.; Hye, R.J.; Makaroun, M.S.; Barone, G.W.; Bandyk, D.; Moneta, G.L.; Makhoul, R.G. The Aneurysm Detection and Management Study Screening Program. Arch. Intern. Med. 2000, 160, 1425–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bakewell, R.; Krokidis, M.; Winterbottom, A. Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Overview of Current Guidance, Strategies, and New Technologies, Perspectives from the United Kingdom. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 5415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chaikof, E.L.; Dalman, R.L.; Eskandari, M.K.; Jackson, B.M.; Lee, W.A.; Mansour, M.A.; Mastracci, T.M.; Mell, M.; Murad, M.H.; Nguyen, L.L.; et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J. Vasc. Surg. 2018, 67, 2–77.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Golledge, J.; Norman, P.E.; Murphy, M.P.; Dalman, R.L. Challenges and opportunities in limiting abdominal aortic aneurysm growth. J. Vasc. Surg. 2017, 65, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Quintana, R.A.; Taylor, W.R. Cellular Mechanisms of Aortic Aneurysm Formation. Circ. Res. 2019, 124, 607–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Guo, J.; Shoji, T.; Ge, Y.; Zheng, X.; Li, Y.; Zhao, S.; Ikezoe, T.; Liu, S.; Huang, J.; Wang, W.; et al. Treatment with the Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor JNJ Promotes Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Progression in Diabetic Mice. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2022, 63, 484–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Iida, Y.; Xu, B.; Xuan, H.; Glover, K.J.; Tanaka, H.; Hu, X.; Fujimura, N.; Wang, W.; Schultz, J.R.; Turner, C.R.; et al. Peptide Inhibitor of CXCL4–CCL5 Heterodimer Formation, MKEY, Inhibits Experimental Aortic Aneurysm Initiation and Progression. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2013, 33, 718–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, B.; Xuan, H.; Iida, Y.; Miyata, M.; Dalman, R.L. Pathogenic and Therapeutic Significance of Angiotensin II Type I Receptor in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Curr. Drug Targets 2018, 19, 1318–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, B.; Iida, Y.; Glover, K.J.; Ge, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xuan, H.; Hu, X.; Tanaka, H.; Wang, W.; Fujimura, N.; et al. Inhibition of VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor)-A or its Receptor Activity Suppresses Experimental Aneurysm Progression in the Aortic Elastase Infusion Model. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019, 39, 1652–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tanaka, H.; Xu, B.; Xuan, H.; Ge, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, W.; Guo, J.; Zhao, S.; Glover, K.J.; et al. Recombinant Interleukin-19 Suppresses the Formation and Progression of Experimental Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e022207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Johnston, W.F.; Salmon, M.; Su, G.; Lu, G.; Stone, M.L.; Zhao, Y.; Owens, G.K.; UpchurchJr, G.R.; Ailawadi, G. Genetic and Pharmacologic Disruption of Interleukin-1β Signaling Inhibits Experimental Aortic Aneurysm Formation. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2013, 33, 294–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wakita, D.; Kurashima, Y.; Crother, T.R.; Rivas, M.N.; Lee, Y.; Chen, S.; Fury, W.; Bai, Y.; Wagner, S.; Li, D.; et al. Role of Interleukin-1 Signaling in a Mouse Model of Kawasaki Disease–Associated Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2016, 36, 886–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Batra, R.; Suh, M.K.; Carson, J.S.; Dale, M.A.; Meisinger, T.M.; Fitzgerald, M.; Opperman, P.J.; Luo, J.; Pipinos, I.I.; Xiong, W.; et al. IL-1β (Interleukin-1β) and TNF-α (Tumor Necrosis Factor-α) Impact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Formation by Differential Effects on Macrophage Polarization. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2018, 38, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Meher, A.K.; Spinosa, M.; Davis, J.P.; Pope, N.; Laubach, V.E.; Su, G.; Serbulea, V.; Leitinger, N.; Ailawadi, G.; Upchurch, G.R. Novel Role of IL (Interleukin)-1β in Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2018, 38, 843–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shi, J.; Guo, J.; Li, Z.; Xu, B.; Miyata, M. Importance of NLRP3 Inflammasome in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2021, 28, 454–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Phie, J.; Thanigaimani, S.; Huynh, P.; Anbalagan, R.; Moran, C.S.; Kinobe, R.; Moxon, J.V.; Field, M.A.; Krishna, S.M.; Golledge, J. Colchicine Does Not Reduce Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Growth in a Mouse Model. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2022, 2022, 5299370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Suehiro, C.; Suzuki, J.; Hamaguchi, M.; Takahashi, K.; Nagao, T.; Sakaue, T.; Uetani, T.; Aono, J.; Ikeda, S.; Okura, T.; et al. Deletion of interleukin-18 attenuates abdominal aortic aneurysm formation. Atherosclerosis 2019, 289, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, C.-L.; Ren, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Sukhova, G.K.; Liao, M.; Santos, M.; Luo, S.; Yang, D.; Xia, M.; et al. Adipocytes promote interleukin-18 binding to its receptors during abdominal aortic aneurysm formation in mice. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 2456–2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Strowig, T.; Henao-Mejia, J.; Elinav, E.; Flavell, R. Inflammasomes in health and disease. Nature 2012, 481, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Chan, A.H.; Schroder, K. Inflammasome signaling and regulation of interleukin-1 family cytokines. J. Exp. Med. 2020, 217, e20190314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huang, Y.; Xu, W.; Zhou, R. NLRP3 inflammasome activation and cell death. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2021, 18, 2114–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fu, J.; Wu, H. Structural Mechanisms of NLRP3 Inflammasome Assembly and Activation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2022, 41, 301–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ren, P.; Wu, D.; Appel, R.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, C.; Luo, W.; Robertson, A.A.B.; Cooper, M.A.; Coselli, J.S.; Milewicz, D.M.; et al. Targeting the NLRP3 Inflammasome with Inhibitor MCC950 Prevents Aortic Aneurysms and Dissections in Mice. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020, 9, e014044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jia, Y.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Z.; Mao, C.; Ma, Z.; Li, W.; Yu, F.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, W.; et al. Targeting macrophage TFEB-14-3-3 epsilon Interface by naringenin inhibits abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cell Discov. 2022, 8, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Ruan, J.; Pan, Y.; Magupalli, V.G.; Wu, H.; Lieberman, J. Inflammasome-activated gasdermin D causes pyroptosis by forming membrane pores. Nature 2016, 535, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lieberman, J.; Wu, H.; Kagan, J.C. Gasdermin D activity in inflammation and host defense. Sci. Immunol. 2019, 4, eaav1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Man, S.M.; Kanneganti, T.-D. Gasdermin D: The long-awaited executioner of pyroptosis. Cell Res. 2015, 25, 1183–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xia, S.; Zhang, Z.; Magupalli, V.G.; Pablo, J.L.; Dong, Y.; Vora, S.M.; Wang, L.; Fu, T.-M.; Jacobson, M.P.; Greka, A.; et al. Gasdermin D pore structure reveals preferential release of mature interleukin-1. Nature 2021, 593, 607–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mulvihill, E.; Sborgi, L.; A Mari, S.; Pfreundschuh, M.; Hiller, S.; Müller, D.J. Mechanism of membrane pore formation by human gasdermin-D. EMBO J. 2018, 37, e98321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. He, W.-T.; Wan, H.; Hu, L.; Chen, P.; Wang, X.; Huang, Z.; Yang, Z.-H.; Zhong, C.-Q.; Han, J. Gasdermin D is an executor of pyroptosis and required for interleukin-1β secretion. Cell Res. 2015, 25, 1285–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Evavold, C.L.; Ruan, J.; Tan, Y.; Xia, S.; Wu, H.; Kagan, J.C. The Pore-Forming Protein Gasdermin D Regulates Interleukin-1 Secretion from Living Macrophages. Immunity 2017, 48, 35–44.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Puylaert, P.; Van Praet, M.; Vaes, F.; Neutel, C.H.G.; Roth, L.; Guns, P.-J.; De Meyer, G.R.Y.; Martinet, W. Gasdermin D Deficiency Limits the Transition of Atherosclerotic Plaques to an Inflammatory Phenotype in ApoE Knock-Out Mice. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Opoku, E.; Traughber, C.A.; Zhang, D.; Iacano, A.J.; Khan, M.; Han, J.; Smith, J.D.; Gulshan, K. Gasdermin D Mediates Inflammation-Induced Defects in Reverse Cholesterol Transport and Promotes Atherosclerosis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 715221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jiang, M.; Sun, X.; Liu, S.; Tang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Bai, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Q.; Yang, Q.; Jiang, W.; et al. Caspase-11-Gasdermin D-Mediated Pyroptosis Is Involved in the Pathogenesis of Atherosclerosis. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 657486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fidler, T.P.; Xue, C.; Yalcinkaya, M.; Hardaway, B.; Abramowicz, S.; Xiao, T.; Liu, W.; Thomas, D.G.; Hajebrahimi, M.A.; Pircher, J.; et al. The AIM2 inflammasome exacerbates atherosclerosis in clonal haematopoiesis. Nature 2021, 592, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hu, R.; Liang, J.; Ding, L.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Pei, L.; Liu, X.; Xia, Z.; et al. Gasdermin D inhibition ameliorates neutrophil mediated brain damage in acute ischemic stroke. Cell Death Discov. 2023, 9, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ye, X.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Luan, J.; Xu, C.; Wu, Z.; Ju, D.; Hu, W. GSDMD contributes to myocardial reperfusion injury by regulating pyroptosis. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 893914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, K.; Sun, Z.; Ru, J.; Wang, S.; Huang, L.; Ruan, L.; Lin, X.; Jin, K.; Zhuge, Q.; Yang, S. Ablation of GSDMD Improves Outcome of Ischemic Stroke Through Blocking Canonical and Non-canonical Inflammasomes Dependent Pyroptosis in Microglia. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 577927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Han, J.; Dai, S.; Zhong, L.; Shi, X.; Fan, X.; Zhong, X.; Lin, W.; Su, L.; Lin, S.; Han, B.; et al. GSDMD (Gasdermin D) Mediates Pathological Cardiac Hypertrophy and Generates a Feed-Forward Amplification Cascade via Mitochondria-STING (Stimulator of Interferon Genes) Axis. Hypertension 2022, 79, 2505–2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lin, S.; Dai, S.; Lin, J.; Liang, X.; Wang, W.; Huang, W.; Ye, B.; Hong, X. Oridonin Relieves Angiotensin II-Induced Cardiac Remodeling via Inhibiting GSDMD-Mediated Inflammation. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2022, 2022, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hu, J.J.; Liu, X.; Xia, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Ruan, J.; Luo, X.; Lou, X.; Bai, Y.; et al. FDA-approved disulfiram inhibits pyroptosis by blocking gasdermin D pore formation. Nat. Immunol. 2020, 21, 736–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Iida, Y.; Xu, B.; Schultz, G.M.; Chow, V.; White, J.J.; Sulaimon, S.; Hezi-Yamit, A.; Peterson, S.R.; Dalman, R.L. Efficacy and Mechanism of Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Treatment in Experimental Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e49642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Daugherty, A.; Manning, M.W.; Cassis, L.A. Angiotensin II promotes atherosclerotic lesions and aneurysms in apolipoprotein E–deficient mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2000, 105, 1605–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Daugherty, A.; Manning, M.; A Cassis, L. Antagonism of AT2 receptors augments Angiotensin II-induced abdominal aortic aneurysms and atherosclerosis. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2001, 134, 865–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Weber, A.N.R.; Bittner, Z.A.; Shankar, S.; Liu, X.; Chang, T.-H.; Jin, T.; Tapia-Abellán, A. Recent insights into the regulatory networks of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. J. Cell Sci. 2020, 133, jcs248344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, W.; Xu, B.; Xuan, H.; Ge, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Huang, J.; Fu, W.; Michie, S.A.; Dalman, R.L. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 in clinical and experimental aortic aneurysm disease. J. Vasc. Surg. 2018, 68, 1538–1550.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Shoji, T.; Guo, J.; Ge, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, G.; Ikezoe, T.; Wang, W.; Zheng, X.; Zhao, S.; Fujimura, N.; et al. Type I Interferon Receptor Subunit 1 Deletion Attenuates Experimental Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Formation. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Usui, F.; Shirasuna, K.; Kimura, H.; Tatsumi, K.; Kawashima, A.; Karasawa, T.; Yoshimura, K.; Aoki, H.; Tsutsui, H.; Noda, T.; et al. Inflammasome Activation by Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress in Macrophages Leads to the Development of Angiotensin II–Induced Aortic Aneurysm. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2015, 35, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ye, D.; Howatt, D.A.; Li, A.; Daugherty, Z.; Lu, H.S.; Wu, C. Gsdmd deficiency protects against aortic rupture. BioRxiv 2021, 8, 425983. [Google Scholar]
  51. Gao, J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, X.; Li, K.; Xu, Y.; Xie, X.; Guo, Y.; Yang, N.; Zhang, X.; et al. Gasdermin D Deficiency in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Ameliorates Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Through Reducing Putrescine Synthesis. Adv. Sci. 2022, 10, e2204038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liao, F.; Wang, L.; Wu, Z.; Luo, G.; Qian, Y.; He, X.; Ding, S.; Pu, J. Disulfiram protects against abdominal aortic aneurysm by ameliorating vascular smooth muscle cells pyroptosis. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Matikainen, S.; Nyman, T.A.; Cypryk, W. Function and Regulation of Noncanonical Caspase-4/5/11 Inflammasome. J. Immunol. 2020, 204, 3063–3069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wright, S.S.; Vasudevan, S.O.; Rathinam, V.A. Mechanisms and Consequences of Noncanonical Inflammasome-Mediated Pyroptosis. J. Mol. Biol. 2022, 434, 167245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kayagaki, N.; Stowe, I.B.; Lee, B.L.; O’Rourke, K.; Anderson, K.; Warming, S.; Cuellar, T.; Haley, B.; Roose-Girma, M.; Phung, Q.T.; et al. Caspase-11 cleaves gasdermin D for non-canonical inflammasome signalling. Nature 2015, 526, 666–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shi, J.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, K.; Shi, X.; Wang, Y.; Huang, H.; Zhuang, Y.; Cai, T.; Wang, F.; Shao, F. Cleavage of GSDMD by inflammatory caspases determines pyroptotic cell death. Nature 2015, 526, 660–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Lee, Y.; Reilly, B.; Tan, C.; Wang, P.; Aziz, M. Extracellular CIRP Induces Macrophage Extracellular Trap Formation Via Gasdermin D Activation. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 780210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Keshavan, S.; Gupta, G.; Martin, S.; Fadeel, B. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes trigger lysosome-dependent cell death (pyroptosis) in macrophages but not in neutrophils. Nanotoxicology 2021, 15, 1125–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jensen, J.C.; Faiman, M.D. Hypothermia as an index of the disulfiram-ethanol reaction in the rat. Alcohol 1984, 1, 97–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Jensen, J.C.; Faiman, M.D. Disulfiram-Ethanol Reaction in the Rat. 1. Blood Alcohol, Acetaldehyde, and Liver Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Relationships. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 1986, 10, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Johansson, B.; Petersen, E.N.; Arnold, E. Diethylthiocarbamic acid methyl ester: A potent inhibitor of aldehyde dehydrogenase found in rats treated with disulfiram or diethyldithiocarbamic acid methyl ester. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1989, 38, 1053–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Petersen, E.N. Pharmacological effects of diethylthiocarbamic acid methyl ester, the active metabolite of disulfiram? Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1989, 166, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bilska-Wilkosz, A.; Kotańska, M.; Górny, M.; Filipek, B.; Iciek, M. Can Lipoic Acid Attenuate Cardiovascular Disturbances Induced by Ethanol and Disulfiram Administration Separately or Jointly in Rats? Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hellström, E.; Tottmar, O. Acute effects of ethanol and acetaldehyde on blood pressure and heart rate in disulfiram-treated and control rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1982, 17, 1103–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Hellström, E.; Tottmar, O.; Fried, R. Implantation of disulfiram in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1980, 13, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Rapsomaniki, E.; Timmis, A.; George, J.; Pujades-Rodriguez, M.; Shah, A.D.; Denaxas, S.; White, I.R.; Caulfield, M.J.; Deanfield, E.J.; Smeeth, L.; et al. Blood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: Lifetime risks, healthy life-years lost, and age-specific associations in 1·25 million people. Lancet 2014, 383, 1899–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jahangir, E.; Lipworth, L.; Edwards, T.L.; Kabagambe, E.K.; Mumma, M.T.; A Mensah, G.; Fazio, S.; Blot, W.J.; A Sampson, U.K. Smoking, sex, risk factors and abdominal aortic aneurysms: A prospective study of 18 782 persons aged above 65 years in the Southern Community Cohort Study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2015, 69, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Takagi, H.; Umemoto, T. Association of Hypertension with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Expansion. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2016, 39, 74–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Manapurathe, D.T.; Moxon, J.V.; Krishna, S.M.; Quigley, F.; Bourke, M.; Bourke, B.; Jones, R.E.; Golledge, J. Cohort Study Examining the Association of Optimal Blood Pressure Control at Entry with Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Growth. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 868889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Golledge, J.; Singh, T.P. Effect of blood pressure lowering drugs and antibiotics on abdominal aortic aneurysm growth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 2021, 107, 1465–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Golledge, J.; Pinchbeck, J.; Tomee, S.M.; Rowbotham, S.E.; Singh, T.; Moxon, J.V.; Jenkins, J.S.; Lindeman, J.H.; Dalman, R.L.; McDonnell, L.; et al. Efficacy of Telmisartan to Slow Growth of Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. JAMA Cardiol. 2020, 5, 1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Fujiwara, Y.; Shiraya, S.; Miyake, T.; Yamakawa, S.; Aoki, M.; Makino, H.; Nishimura, M.; Morishita, R. Inhibition of experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm in a rat model by the angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2008, 22, 703–708. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  73. Kaschina, E.; Schrader, F.; Sommerfeld, M.; Kemnitz, U.R.; Grzesiak, A.; Krikov, M.; Unger, T. Telmisartan prevents aneurysm progression in the rat by inhibiting proteolysis, apoptosis and inflammation. J. Hypertens. 2008, 26, 2361–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Xuan, H.; Xu, B.; Wang, W.; Tanaka, H.; Fujimura, N.; Miyata, M.; Michie, S.A.; Dalman, R.L. Inhibition or deletion of angiotensin II type 1 receptor suppresses elastase-induced experimental abdominal aortic aneurysms. J. Vasc. Surg. 2018, 67, 573–584.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ricci, M.A.; Slaiby, J.M.; Gadowski, G.R.; Hendley, E.D.; Nichols, P.; Pilcher, D.B. Effects of Hypertension and Propranolol upon Aneurysm Expansion in the Anidjar/Dobrin Aneurysm Model. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1996, 800, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mieth, A.; Revermann, M.; Babelova, A.; Weigert, A.; Schermuly, R.T.; Brandes, R.P. l -Type Calcium Channel Inhibitor Diltiazem Prevents Aneurysm Formation by Blood Pressure–Independent Anti-Inflammatory Effects. Hypertension 2013, 62, 1098–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Park, S.M.; Hong, M.-K.; Kim, S.H.; Jung, S.; Kim, B.K.; Choi, D. Comparison of Efficacy between Ramipril and Carvedilol on Limiting the Expansion of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Mouse Model. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019, 24, 172–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kurobe, H.; Matsuoka, Y.; Hirata, Y.; Sugasawa, N.; Maxfield, M.W.; Sata, M.; Kitagawa, T. Azelnidipine suppresses the progression of aortic aneurysm in wild mice model through anti-inflammatory effects. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2013, 146, 1501–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Slaiby, J.M.; Ricci, M.A.; Gadowski, G.R.; Hendley, E.D.; Pilcher, D.B. Expansion of aortic aneurysms is reduced by propranolol in a hypertensive rat model. J. Vasc. Surg. 1994, 20, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Takahashi, K.; Matsumoto, Y.; Do.E, Z.; Kanazawa, M.; Satoh, K.; Shimizu, T.; Sato, A.; Fukumoto, Y.; Shimokawa, H. Combination Therapy with Atorvastatin and Amlodipine Suppresses Angiotensin II-Induced Aortic Aneurysm Formation. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e72558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Cassis, L.A.; Gupte, M.; Thayer, S.; Zhang, X.; Charnigo, R.; Howatt, D.A.; Rateri, D.L.; Daugherty, A.; Glenn, D.J.; Cardema, M.C.; et al. ANG II infusion promotes abdominal aortic aneurysms independent of increased blood pressure in hypercholesterolemic mice. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 2009, 296, H1660–H1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Tang, W.; Yao, L.; Roetker, N.S.; Alonso, A.; Lutsey, P.L.; Steenson, C.C.; Lederle, F.A.; Hunter, D.W.; Bengtson, L.G.; Guan, W.; et al. Lifetime risk and risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a 24-year prospective study: The aric study (atherosclerosis risk in communities). Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2016, 36, 2468–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Klarin, D.; Damrauer, S.M.; Cho, K.; Sun, Y.V.; Teslovich, T.M.; Honerlaw, J.; Gagnon, D.R.; Duvall, S.L.; Li, J.; Peloso, G.M.; et al. Genetics of blood lipids among ~300,000 multi-ethnic participants of the Million Veteran Program. Nat. Genet. 2018, 50, 1514–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Police, S.B.; Thatcher, S.E.; Charnigo, R.; Daugherty, A.; Cassis, L.A. Obesity Promotes Inflammation in Periaortic Adipose Tissue and Angiotensin II-Induced Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Formation. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2009, 29, 1458–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wang, Y.; Ait-Oufella, H.; Herbin, O.; Bonnin, P.; Ramkhelawon, B.; Taleb, S.; Huang, J.; Offenstadt, G.; Combadiere, C.; Rénia, L.; et al. TGF-β activity protects against inflammatory aortic aneurysm progression and complications in angiotensin II–infused mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2010, 120, 422–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Ikezoe, T.; Shoji, T.; Guo, J.; Shen, F.; Lu, H.S.; Daugherty, A.; Nunokawa, M.; Kubota, H.; Miyata, M.; Xu, B.; et al. No Effect of Hypercholesterolemia on Elastase-Induced Experimental Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Progression. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mulorz, J.; Spin, J.M.; Beck, H.C.; Thi, M.L.T.; Wagenhäuser, M.U.; Rasmussen, L.M.; Lindholt, J.S.; Tsao, P.S.C.; Steffensen, L.B. Hyperlipidemia does not affect development of elastase-induced abdominal aortic aneurysm in mice. Atherosclerosis 2020, 311, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Police, S.B.; Putnam, K.; Thatcher, S.; Batifoulier-Yiannikouris, F.; Daugherty, A.; Cassis, L.A. Weight loss in obese C57BL/6 mice limits adventitial expansion of established angiotensin II-induced abdominal aortic aneurysms. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 2010, 298, H1932–H1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Humphries, F.; Shmuel-Galia, L.; Ketelut-Carneiro, N.; Li, S.; Wang, B.; Nemmara, V.V.; Wilson, R.; Jiang, Z.; Khalighinejad, F.; Muneeruddin, K.; et al. Succination inactivates gasdermin D and blocks pyroptosis. Science 2020, 369, 1633–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Rathkey, J.K.; Zhao, J.; Liu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Yang, J.; Kondolf, H.C.; Benson, B.L.; Chirieleison, S.M.; Huang, A.Y.; Dubyak, G.R.; et al. Chemical disruption of the pyroptotic pore-forming protein gasdermin D inhibits inflammatory cell death and sepsis. Sci. Immunol. 2018, 3, eaat2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Balasubramanian, A.; Ghimire, L.; Hsu, A.Y.; Kambara, H.; Liu, X.; Hasegawa, T.; Xu, R.; Tahir, M.; Yu, H.; Lieberman, J.; et al. Palmitoylation of gasdermin d directs its membrane translocation and pore formation in pyroptosis. BioRxiv 2023, 21, 529402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Silva, C.M.S.; Wanderley, C.W.S.; Veras, F.P.; Gonçalves, A.V.; Lima, M.H.F.; Toller-Kawahisa, J.E.; Gomes, G.F.; Nascimento, D.C.; Monteiro, V.V.S.; Paiva, I.M.; et al. Gasdermin-D activation by SARS-CoV-2 triggers NET and mediate COVID-19 immunopathology. Crit. Care 2022, 26, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Hu, X.; Zeng, Q.; Xiao, J.; Qin, S.; Wang, Y.; Shan, T.; Hu, D.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, K.; Zheng, K.; et al. Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Induces Microglia Gasdermin D-Dependent Pyroptosis Through Activating the NLR Family Pyrin Domain Containing 3 Inflammasome. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 838808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomolecules 13 00899 g001 550
Figure 1. Disulfiram treatment attenuates the formation and progression of experimental AAAs. Experimental AAAs were induced in ApoE deficient male mice by subcutaneously infusing angiotensin II for 28 days. Mice were treated with gasdermin D inhibitor disulfiram or vehicle (saline) and monitored for AAA formation and progression via ultrasonography. (A): Representative ultrasound images of suprarenal aortas at the baseline and day 28 in vehicle and disulfiram treatment groups following angiotensin II infusion. (B): Mean ± standard deviation of maximal suprarenal aortic diameters at different time points in vehicle- and disulfiram-treated, angiotensin II-infused ApoE deficient mice. Two-way ANOVA followed by two group comparison, 0.05 < # p <0.1 and ** p < 0.01 compared to vehicle treatment at same time point. (C): AAA incidence. AAA: the presence of aortic dissection imaged by ultrasonography, a 50% or more increase in aortic diameter over the baseline, or death due to AAA rupture. Log-rank test, ** p < 0.01 compared to vehicle treatment. (D): Mortality due to AAA rupture. n = 13 mice/group. Aortic diameters in panel A: 1.01 mm and 1.61 mm on days 0 and 28 for vehicle treatment and 1.03 mm and 1.29 mm on days 0 and 28 for disulfiram treatment.
Figure 1. Disulfiram treatment attenuates the formation and progression of experimental AAAs. Experimental AAAs were induced in ApoE deficient male mice by subcutaneously infusing angiotensin II for 28 days. Mice were treated with gasdermin D inhibitor disulfiram or vehicle (saline) and monitored for AAA formation and progression via ultrasonography. (A): Representative ultrasound images of suprarenal aortas at the baseline and day 28 in vehicle and disulfiram treatment groups following angiotensin II infusion. (B): Mean ± standard deviation of maximal suprarenal aortic diameters at different time points in vehicle- and disulfiram-treated, angiotensin II-infused ApoE deficient mice. Two-way ANOVA followed by two group comparison, 0.05 < # p <0.1 and ** p < 0.01 compared to vehicle treatment at same time point. (C): AAA incidence. AAA: the presence of aortic dissection imaged by ultrasonography, a 50% or more increase in aortic diameter over the baseline, or death due to AAA rupture. Log-rank test, ** p < 0.01 compared to vehicle treatment. (D): Mortality due to AAA rupture. n = 13 mice/group. Aortic diameters in panel A: 1.01 mm and 1.61 mm on days 0 and 28 for vehicle treatment and 1.03 mm and 1.29 mm on days 0 and 28 for disulfiram treatment.
Biomolecules 13 00899 g001
Biomolecules 13 00899 g002 550
Figure 2. Disulfiram treatment reduces experimental AAA severity. ApoE deficient mice were infused with angiotensin II (1000 ng/kg/min) for 28 days using the subcutaneous implantation of osmotic pumps. Twenty-eight days thereafter, mice were sacrificed, and AAA severity in suprarenal aorta was graded as I to IV based on the presence of aortic dilation, intramural hematoma, and the number of AAAs. An AAA in which the mouse died due to AAA rupture was graded as V. (A): Representative macroscopic appearance of aneurysms in the vehicle (graded as II, III, and I from left to right) and disulfiram (all graded as I) treatment groups. (B): Distribution of AAA severity scores in vehicle and disulfiram treatment groups. Chi-square test, p < 0.01 between two groups. (C): Media and interquartile (25th and 75th) of AAA severity in the vehicle and disulfiram treatment groups. Nonparametric Mann–Whitney test, ** p < 0.01 compared to vehicle treatment. n = 13 mice/group.
Figure 2. Disulfiram treatment reduces experimental AAA severity. ApoE deficient mice were infused with angiotensin II (1000 ng/kg/min) for 28 days using the subcutaneous implantation of osmotic pumps. Twenty-eight days thereafter, mice were sacrificed, and AAA severity in suprarenal aorta was graded as I to IV based on the presence of aortic dilation, intramural hematoma, and the number of AAAs. An AAA in which the mouse died due to AAA rupture was graded as V. (A): Representative macroscopic appearance of aneurysms in the vehicle (graded as II, III, and I from left to right) and disulfiram (all graded as I) treatment groups. (B): Distribution of AAA severity scores in vehicle and disulfiram treatment groups. Chi-square test, p < 0.01 between two groups. (C): Media and interquartile (25th and 75th) of AAA severity in the vehicle and disulfiram treatment groups. Nonparametric Mann–Whitney test, ** p < 0.01 compared to vehicle treatment. n = 13 mice/group.
Biomolecules 13 00899 g002
Biomolecules 13 00899 g003 550
Figure 3. Disulfiram treatment mitigates aneurysmal histopathologies. Histological analyses were performed on paraffin-embedded aortic sections of vehicle- and disulfiram-treated ApoE deficient mice 28 days after angiotensin II infusion. Upper panels (H&E stain): less aortic wall inflammation in disulfiram- as compared to vehicle-treated aneurysmal mice. Middle panels (Elastica van Gieson (EVG) stain): well organized dense medial elastin lamella in disulfiram- as compared to vehicle-treated aneurysmal mice. Lower panels: reduced aortic macrophages in disulfiram- as compared to vehicle-treated aneurysmal mice. Magnification: ×200 for upper and middle panels and ×400 in lower panel. Scale bar: 100 µm in upper and middle panels and 50 µm in lower panels.
Figure 3. Disulfiram treatment mitigates aneurysmal histopathologies. Histological analyses were performed on paraffin-embedded aortic sections of vehicle- and disulfiram-treated ApoE deficient mice 28 days after angiotensin II infusion. Upper panels (H&E stain): less aortic wall inflammation in disulfiram- as compared to vehicle-treated aneurysmal mice. Middle panels (Elastica van Gieson (EVG) stain): well organized dense medial elastin lamella in disulfiram- as compared to vehicle-treated aneurysmal mice. Lower panels: reduced aortic macrophages in disulfiram- as compared to vehicle-treated aneurysmal mice. Magnification: ×200 for upper and middle panels and ×400 in lower panel. Scale bar: 100 µm in upper and middle panels and 50 µm in lower panels.
Biomolecules 13 00899 g003
Biomolecules 13 00899 g004 550
Figure 4. Disulfiram treatment reduces the systemic levels of IL-1β not IL-18 in experimental AAA mice. Twenty-eight days after angiotensin II infusion, sera were prepared from all ApoE−/− mice. IL-1β and IL-18 levels were measured via the ELISA method. (A): IL)-1β. (B): IL-18. All data are media and interquartile (25th and 75th). Nonparametric Mann–Whitney test, * p < 0.05 compared to vehicle treatment group. n = 9–12 mice/group.
Figure 4. Disulfiram treatment reduces the systemic levels of IL-1β not IL-18 in experimental AAA mice. Twenty-eight days after angiotensin II infusion, sera were prepared from all ApoE−/− mice. IL-1β and IL-18 levels were measured via the ELISA method. (A): IL)-1β. (B): IL-18. All data are media and interquartile (25th and 75th). Nonparametric Mann–Whitney test, * p < 0.05 compared to vehicle treatment group. n = 9–12 mice/group.
Biomolecules 13 00899 g004
Biomolecules 13 00899 g005 550
Figure 5. Disulfiram treatment slightly lowers systolic blood pressure without affecting body weight and lipid levels in ApoE−/− mice 28 days following angiotensin II infusion. (A): Body weight at the baseline and 28 days after angiotensin II infusion. (B): Systolic blood pressure at the baseline and 28 days after angiotensin II infusion measured via the tail-cuff method. (C,D): Total serum cholesterol (C) and triglyceride (D) levels in ApoE−/− mice 28 days after angiotensin II infusion. n = 13 in vehicle and n = 14 in disulfiram groups, respectively. All data are given as mean ± standard deviation. Two-way ANOVA test followed by two group comparison (A,B) or Student’s t-test, ** p < 0.01 between two treatment groups.
Figure 5. Disulfiram treatment slightly lowers systolic blood pressure without affecting body weight and lipid levels in ApoE−/− mice 28 days following angiotensin II infusion. (A): Body weight at the baseline and 28 days after angiotensin II infusion. (B): Systolic blood pressure at the baseline and 28 days after angiotensin II infusion measured via the tail-cuff method. (C,D): Total serum cholesterol (C) and triglyceride (D) levels in ApoE−/− mice 28 days after angiotensin II infusion. n = 13 in vehicle and n = 14 in disulfiram groups, respectively. All data are given as mean ± standard deviation. Two-way ANOVA test followed by two group comparison (A,B) or Student’s t-test, ** p < 0.01 between two treatment groups.
Biomolecules 13 00899 g005
Biomolecules 13 00899 g006 550
Figure 6. Disulfiram treatment reduces mouse macrophage viability and IL-1β secretion in vitro. Mouse macrophages (cell line RAW264.7) were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (100 ng/mL) followed by an additional 24-hour incubation in the presence or absence of angiotensin (Ang) II (100 nM) and/or disulfiram (25 mM). (A): Cell viability was determined by CCK8 ELISA. (B): Supernatant IL-1β concentration was determined by IL-1β ELISA. Two-way ANOVA followed by two group comparison, 0.05 < # p < 0.1 and ** p < 0.01 compared to vehicle treatment. n = 3.
Figure 6. Disulfiram treatment reduces mouse macrophage viability and IL-1β secretion in vitro. Mouse macrophages (cell line RAW264.7) were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (100 ng/mL) followed by an additional 24-hour incubation in the presence or absence of angiotensin (Ang) II (100 nM) and/or disulfiram (25 mM). (A): Cell viability was determined by CCK8 ELISA. (B): Supernatant IL-1β concentration was determined by IL-1β ELISA. Two-way ANOVA followed by two group comparison, 0.05 < # p < 0.1 and ** p < 0.01 compared to vehicle treatment. n = 3.
Biomolecules 13 00899 g006
Biomolecules 13 00899 g007 550
Figure 7. Gasdermin D in AAA pathogenesis. Canonical and noncanonical inflammasome activation and viral proteinases convert procaspases 1, 4, 5, 7, and 11 to corresponding active forms which activates gasdermin D by cleaving it to N- and C-terminals. The C-terminal forms the membrane pores through which proaneurysmal interleukin 1β is secreted. Cell death (pyroptosis) due to excess pore formation also releases various types of intracellular proaneurysmal mediators including cytokines. Alternatively, gasdermin D activation switches smooth muscle cells (SMCs) from contractible towards secretory phenotype leading to proaneurysmal mediator release. Disulfiram blocks active caspase-mediated gasdermin D cleavage and thus suppresses experimental AAAs probably in pore-dependent and -independent manners.
Figure 7. Gasdermin D in AAA pathogenesis. Canonical and noncanonical inflammasome activation and viral proteinases convert procaspases 1, 4, 5, 7, and 11 to corresponding active forms which activates gasdermin D by cleaving it to N- and C-terminals. The C-terminal forms the membrane pores through which proaneurysmal interleukin 1β is secreted. Cell death (pyroptosis) due to excess pore formation also releases various types of intracellular proaneurysmal mediators including cytokines. Alternatively, gasdermin D activation switches smooth muscle cells (SMCs) from contractible towards secretory phenotype leading to proaneurysmal mediator release. Disulfiram blocks active caspase-mediated gasdermin D cleavage and thus suppresses experimental AAAs probably in pore-dependent and -independent manners.
Biomolecules 13 00899 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, J.; Shi, J.; Qin, M.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Shoji, T.; Ikezoe, T.; Ge, Y.; Xu, B. Pharmacological Inhibition of Gasdermin D Suppresses Angiotensin II-Induced Experimental Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 899. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13060899

AMA Style

Guo J, Shi J, Qin M, Wang Y, Li Z, Shoji T, Ikezoe T, Ge Y, Xu B. Pharmacological Inhibition of Gasdermin D Suppresses Angiotensin II-Induced Experimental Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Biomolecules. 2023; 13(6):899. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13060899

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Jia, Jinyun Shi, Min Qin, Yan Wang, Zhidong Li, Takahiro Shoji, Toru Ikezoe, Yingbin Ge, and Baohui Xu. 2023. "Pharmacological Inhibition of Gasdermin D Suppresses Angiotensin II-Induced Experimental Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms" Biomolecules 13, no. 6: 899. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13060899

APA Style

Guo, J., Shi, J., Qin, M., Wang, Y., Li, Z., Shoji, T., Ikezoe, T., Ge, Y., & Xu, B. (2023). Pharmacological Inhibition of Gasdermin D Suppresses Angiotensin II-Induced Experimental Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Biomolecules, 13(6), 899. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13060899

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop