Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Promiscuity of the Euonymus Carbohydrate-Binding Domain
Previous Article in Journal
Sumoylation and the DNA Damage Response
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Comparative Studies of Vertebrate Platelet Glycoprotein 4 (CD36)

Eskitis Institute for Cell and Molecular Therapies, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia
Biomolecules 2012, 2(3), 389-414; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom2030389
Submission received: 2 August 2012 / Revised: 6 September 2012 / Accepted: 18 September 2012 / Published: 24 September 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges in Glycan, Glycoprotein and Proteoglycan Research)

Abstract

:
Platelet glycoprotein 4 (CD36) (or fatty acyl translocase [FAT], or scavenger receptor class B, member 3 [SCARB3]) is an essential cell surface and skeletal muscle outer mitochondrial membrane glycoprotein involved in multiple functions in the body. CD36 serves as a ligand receptor of thrombospondin, long chain fatty acids, oxidized low density lipoproteins (LDLs) and malaria-infected erythrocytes. CD36 also influences various diseases, including angiogenesis, thrombosis, atherosclerosis, malaria, diabetes, steatosis, dementia and obesity. Genetic deficiency of this protein results in significant changes in fatty acid and oxidized lipid uptake. Comparative CD36 amino acid sequences and structures and CD36 gene locations were examined using data from several vertebrate genome projects. Vertebrate CD36 sequences shared 53–100% identity as compared with 29–32% sequence identities with other CD36-like superfamily members, SCARB1 and SCARB2. At least eight vertebrate CD36 N-glycosylation sites were conserved which are required for membrane integration. Sequence alignments, key amino acid residues and predicted secondary structures were also studied. Three CD36 domains were identified including cytoplasmic, transmembrane and exoplasmic sequences. Conserved sequences included N- and C-terminal transmembrane glycines; and exoplasmic cysteine disulphide residues; TSP-1 and PE binding sites, Thr92 and His242, respectively; 17 conserved proline and 14 glycine residues, which may participate in forming CD36 ‘short loops’; and basic amino acid residues, and may contribute to fatty acid and thrombospondin binding. Vertebrate CD36 genes usually contained 12 coding exons. The human CD36 gene contained transcription factor binding sites (including PPARG and PPARA) contributing to a high gene expression level (6.6 times average). Phylogenetic analyses examined the relationships and potential evolutionary origins of the vertebrate CD36 gene with vertebrate SCARB1 and SCARB2 genes. These suggested that CD36 originated in an ancestral genome and was subsequently duplicated to form three vertebrate CD36 gene family members, SCARB1, SCARB2 and CD36.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Platelet glycoprotein 4 (CD36) (cluster of differentiation 36) (or fatty acyl translocase [FAT]; and scavenger receptor class B, member 3 [SCARB3]) is one of at least three members of the CD36-like family that is an integral membrane protein of many tissues of the body which plays a role in fatty acyl translocation and as a multiple ligand cell surface receptor of oxidized LDL lipoproteins (ox-LDL), long chain fatty acids, aged neutrophils and Plasmodium falciparum-parasitized erythrocytes (PE) which has been implicated in several diseases including insulin resistance, diabetes, atherosclerosis and malaria [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. CD36 has also been reported on the outer mitochondrial membrane of skeletal muscle and serves a long chain fatty acid transport role, as well as contributing to the regulation of fatty acid oxidation by muscle mitochondria [11]. In addition, CD36 contributes to cerebrovascular oxidative stress and neurovascular dysfunction induced by amyloid-beta in Alzeheimer’s dementia [12,13] and may serve a ‘lipid-sensing’ role in the body with a broad physiological role as a lipid-receptor protein which influences eating behavior and energy balance [14]. Moreover, a specific CD36-dependent signaling pathway has been proposed for platelet activation by ox-LDL [15].
SCARB1 (also called CLA1, SRB1 and CD36L1), a second member of the CD36-like family, is a homo-oligomeric plasma membrane cell surface glycoprotein receptor for high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), other phospholipid ligands and chylomicron remnants [16,17,18,19,20]. SCARB2 (also called LIMP2 (lysosomal integral membrane protein), SRB2 and CD36L2) is a third member of the CD36 family predominantly integrated within lysosomal and endosomal membranes which contributes to lysosomal membrane organization and transport functions [21,22,23,24,25].
The gene encoding CD36 (CD36 in humans; Cd36 in mice) is localized on chromosome 7 q11.2 and is encoded by 15 exons, including 12 coding exons [26,27,28,29]. Human CD36 is expressed at very high levels in various cells and tissues of the body, including platelets, monocytes/macrophages, and microvascular endothelial cells, plays important roles in atherosclerosis, inflammation, thrombosis and angiogenesis [4,6,7,30,31,32], and is upregulated in human monocytes following statin administration [33]. Studies of Cd36¯/Cd36¯ knockout mice have shown that CD36-deficiency protects against Western-type diet related cardiac dysfunction [34,35,36] and contributes to a reduction in fatty acid oxidation by muscle mitochondria [11,37]. Human clinical studies have also examined CD36 polymorphisms associated with enhanced atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases [38,39], type II diabetes [9], oral fat perception, fat preference and obesity in African-Americans [40] and protection from malaria [41,42]. In addition, hepatic CD36 upregulation has been shown to be associated with insulin resistance, hyperinsulinaemia, and increased steatosis in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and chronic hepatitis C [43]. Reviews of the role of macrophage human CD36 in atherosclerosis have been published [7,44].
This paper reports the predicted gene structures and amino acid sequences for several vertebrate CD36 genes and proteins, the secondary structures for vertebrate CD36 proteins, several potential sites for regulating human CD36 gene expression and the structural, phylogenetic and evolutionary relationships for these genes and enzymes with those for vertebrate CD36, SCARB1 and SCARB2 gene families.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Alignments of Vertebrate CD36 Amino Acid Sequences

The deduced amino acid sequences for cow (Bos taurus), opossum (Monodelphis domestica), chicken (Gallus gallus), frog (Xenopus tropicalis) and zebrafish (Danio rerio) CD36 are shown in Figure 1 together with previously reported sequences for human and mouse CD36 (Table 1) [45,46]. Alignments of human with other vertebrate CD36 sequences examined were 53–100% identical, suggesting that these are products of the same family of genes, whereas comparisons of sequence identities of vertebrate CD36 proteins with human SCARB1 and SCARB2 proteins exhibited lower levels of sequence identities (30–32%), indicating that these are members of distinct CD36-like gene families (Supplementary Table 1)
The amino acid sequences for eutherian mammalian CD36 contained 472 residues, whereas opossum (Monodelphis domestica), platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus) and chicken (Gallus gallus) CD36 sequences contained 471 residues, while frog (Xenopus tropicalis) and zebrafish (Danio rerio) CD36 sequences contained 470 and 465 amino acids, respectively (Table 1; Figure 1). Previous studies have reported several key regions and residues for human and mouse CD36 proteins (human CD36 amino acid residues were identified in each case). These included cytoplasmic N-terminal and C-terminal residues: residues 2-6 and 462-472; N-terminal and C-terminal trans-membrane helical regions: residues 7-28 and 440-461 [32,45]; palmitoylated cysteine residues (Cys3; Cys7; Cys464; and Cys466) in the N- and C-terminal CD36 cytoplasmic tails [47]; exoplasmic Thr92, which is phosphorylated by protein kinase C alpha and contributes to the suppression of thrombospondin-1 binding in vitro [48]; His242 which contributes to the interaction of CD36-dependent endothelial cell adherence with Plasmodium falcurum [4]; and six exoplasmic disulfide bond forming residues: Cys243, Cys272, Cys311, Cys313, Cys322 and Cys333 [49].
Table 1. CD36, SCARB1 and SCARB2 genes and proteins. RefSeq: the reference amino acid sequence; ¹predicted Ensembl amino acid sequence; na-not available; GenBank IDs are derived from NCBI http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/; Ensembl ID was derived from Ensembl genome database http://www.ensembl.org; * designates scaffold; Un refers to unknown chromosome; UNIPROT refers to UniprotKB/Swiss-Prot IDs for individual CD36-like proteins (see http://kr.expasy.org); Un-refers to unknown chromosome; bps refers to base pairs of nucleotide sequences; the number of coding exons are listed; gene expression levels are in bold.
Table 1. CD36, SCARB1 and SCARB2 genes and proteins. RefSeq: the reference amino acid sequence; ¹predicted Ensembl amino acid sequence; na-not available; GenBank IDs are derived from NCBI http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/; Ensembl ID was derived from Ensembl genome database http://www.ensembl.org; * designates scaffold; Un refers to unknown chromosome; UNIPROT refers to UniprotKB/Swiss-Prot IDs for individual CD36-like proteins (see http://kr.expasy.org); Un-refers to unknown chromosome; bps refers to base pairs of nucleotide sequences; the number of coding exons are listed; gene expression levels are in bold.
CD36 GeneSpeciesRefSeq ID ¹Ensembl/NCBI GenBank IDUNIPROT IDAmino acidsChromosome locationCoding Exons (strand)Gene Size bpsGene Expression Level
Human Homo sapiens NM_001001547BC008406P166714727:80,275,645-80,303,732 12 (+ve)72,2316.6
Chimpanzee Pan troglodytes ¹XP_519573nana4727:81,142,402-81,169,764 12 (+ve)#27,363na
Orangutan Pongo abelii ¹XP_002818343nana4727:95,750,733-95,779,630 12 (-ve)#28,898na
Gibbon Nomascus leucogenys ¹XP_003252221nana472*GL397261:11,570,433-11,598,11412 (+ve)#27,682na
Rhesus Macaca mulatta NP_001028085 nana4723:136,626,102-136,653,066 12 (+ve)#27,682na
Mouse Mus musculus NM_001159555.1BC010262Q088574725:17,291,543-17,334,712 12 (-ve)43,1704.2
Rat Rattus norvegicus NP_113749 L19658Q079694724:13,472,534-13,522,334 12 (+ve)49,8010.3
Guinea Pig Cavia porcellus ¹XP_003469862nana472*31:20,074,611-20,098,210 12 (+ve)#23,600na
Cow Bos taurus NM_17410BC103112P262014724:40,585,624-40,614,621 12 (-ve)#28,998na
Dog Canis familaris NM_001177734ADE58431na47218:23,334,171-23,360,045 12 (+ve)#25,875na
Pig Sus scrofa NP_001038087AK400585Q3HUX14729:93,204,848-93,241,842 12 (-ve)#36,995na
Rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus ¹XP_002712062nana4727:35,303,111-35,333,630 12 (-ve)#30,520na
Horse Equus caballus ¹XP_001487957nana4724:6730,96-698,607 12 (-ve)#25,512na
Elephant Loxodonta africana ¹XP_003407226nana4725: 69,036,730-69,073,879 12 (-ve)#37,150na
Opossum Monodelphis domestica ¹XP_001364375nana4718:149,041,138-149,075,533 12 (-ve)#34,396na
Platypus Ornithorhynchus anatinus ¹XP_001506583nana471*Ultra5:3,505,963-3,536,96312 (-ve)#31,001na
Chicken Gallus gallus ¹ENSGALG8439AJ719746F1NER94711:12,077,308-12,107,415 12 (-ve)30,108na
Lizard Anolis carolinensis ¹XP_003221568nana4725:93,087,943-93,120,933 12 (-ve)#32,991na
Frog Xenopus tropicalis NP_001107151nana470*GL172681:663,550-679,762 12 (-ve)#16,213na
Zebrafish Danio rerio NP_001002363.1BC076048Q6DHC74654:21,594,449-21,606,961 12 (-ve)12,513na
SCARB1 GeneSpeciesRefSeq ID ¹Ensembl/NCBI GenBank IDUNIPROT IDAmino acidsChromosome locationCoding Exons (strand)Gene Size bpsGene Expression Level
Human Homo sapiens NM_00505BC022087Q8WVT050912:125,267,232-125,348,266 12 (-ve)81,03513.7
Mouse Mus musculus NM_001205082.1BC004656Q610095095:125,761,478-125,821,25212 (-ve)63,9855.1
Chicken Gallus gallus ¹XP_415106nana50315:4,543,054-4,558,954 12 (+ve)15,901na
Zebrafish Danio rerio NM_198121BC044516E7FB5049611:21,526,513-21,572,47812 (-ve)45,684na
SCARB2 Gene
Human Homo sapiens NM_005506BT006939Q53Y634784:77,084,378-77,134,696 12 (-ve)50,3163.2
Mouse Mus musculus NM_007644BC029073O351144785:92,875,330-92,934,334 12 (-ve)59,0053.6
Chicken Gallus gallus ¹XP_42093.1BX931548na4814:51,411,268-51,429,620 12 (+ve)18,353na
Zebrafish Danio rerio NM_173259.1BC162407Q8JQR8531 5: 63,942,096-63,955,44913 (+ve)13,354na
CD36 Gene
Lancelet Branchiostoma floridae ¹XP_002609178.1nana480Un:534,334,234-534,343,08212 (+ve)8,849na
Sea squirt Ciona intestinalis ¹XP_002127015.1nana52309p:2,872,362-2,873,903 1 (-ve)1,542na
Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans NM_067224naQ9XTT3534III:12,453,609-12,456,7268 (+ve)3,1184.6
Fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster NP_523859nana5202R:20,864,606-20,867,1166 (-ve)#2,511na
Figure 1. Amino Acid Sequence Alignments for Vertebrate CD36 Sequences. See Table 1 for sources of CD36 sequences; Hu-human; Mo-mouse; Co-cow; Op-opossum; Ch-chicken; Fr-frog; Zf-zebrafish; * shows identical residues for CD36 subunits; : similar alternate residues; . dissimilar alternate residues; predicted cytoplasmic residues are shown in Biomolecules 02 00389 i001; predicted transmembrane residues are shown in Biomolecules 02 00389 i002; N-glycosylated and potential N-glycosylated Asn sites are in Biomolecules 02 00389 i003; exoplasmic Thr92, which is phosphorylated by pyruvate kinase alpha, is shown in Biomolecules 02 00389 i004; predicted disulfide bond Cys residues are shown in Biomolecules 02 00389 i005; predicted α-helices for vertebrate CD36 are in Biomolecules 02 00389 i006 and numbered in sequence from the start of the predicted exoplasmic domain; predicted β-sheets are in Biomolecules 02 00389 i007 and also numbered in sequence; bold underlined font shows residues corresponding to known or predicted exon start sites; exon numbers refer to human CD36 gene exons; Biomolecules 02 00389 i008 residues refer to conserved glycines in the N- and C-terminal oligomerisation domains of the trans-membrane sequence [49]; CD36 binding domains are identified: THP-refers to binding region for low-density lipoproteins [6,7,8]; neutrophil phagocytosis domain designated by [3,7]; PE binding refers to cytoadherence region of Plasmodium falciparum-parasitized erythrocytes (PE) to endothelial cells [4].
Figure 1. Amino Acid Sequence Alignments for Vertebrate CD36 Sequences. See Table 1 for sources of CD36 sequences; Hu-human; Mo-mouse; Co-cow; Op-opossum; Ch-chicken; Fr-frog; Zf-zebrafish; * shows identical residues for CD36 subunits; : similar alternate residues; . dissimilar alternate residues; predicted cytoplasmic residues are shown in Biomolecules 02 00389 i001; predicted transmembrane residues are shown in Biomolecules 02 00389 i002; N-glycosylated and potential N-glycosylated Asn sites are in Biomolecules 02 00389 i003; exoplasmic Thr92, which is phosphorylated by pyruvate kinase alpha, is shown in Biomolecules 02 00389 i004; predicted disulfide bond Cys residues are shown in Biomolecules 02 00389 i005; predicted α-helices for vertebrate CD36 are in Biomolecules 02 00389 i006 and numbered in sequence from the start of the predicted exoplasmic domain; predicted β-sheets are in Biomolecules 02 00389 i007 and also numbered in sequence; bold underlined font shows residues corresponding to known or predicted exon start sites; exon numbers refer to human CD36 gene exons; Biomolecules 02 00389 i008 residues refer to conserved glycines in the N- and C-terminal oligomerisation domains of the trans-membrane sequence [49]; CD36 binding domains are identified: THP-refers to binding region for low-density lipoproteins [6,7,8]; neutrophil phagocytosis domain designated by [3,7]; PE binding refers to cytoadherence region of Plasmodium falciparum-parasitized erythrocytes (PE) to endothelial cells [4].
Biomolecules 02 00389 g001

2.2. Comparative Sequences for Vertebrate CD36 N-Glycosylation Sites

Ten exoplasmic N-glycosylation sites for human CD36 have been previously identified for this protein (Figure 1; Table 2) [50]. One of these sites (site 2) contained a proline residue at the second position and may not function as an N-glycosylation site due to proline-induced inaccessibility [51]. Eight of these sites were predominantly retained among the 19 vertebrate CD36 sequences examined (sites 4, 5, 10, 15, 19, 23 and 25) (Figure 1; Table 2). The sequence conservation observed for these residues among the vertebrate CD36 sequences examined suggests that they contribute significantly to the structure and function of vertebrate CD36 as a glycoprotein. The multiple N-glycosylation sites observed for vertebrate CD36 sequences suggest a role for N-proteoglycan residues exposed on the external surface of plasma membranes in the performance of CD36 functions in binding various lipid molecules, including long chain fatty acids. This is also supported by recent animal model studies examining the impacts of reduced N-glycosylation upon cardiac long chain fatty metabolism, which demonstrated a key role for N-glycosylation in the recruitment of CD36 into cardiac membranes [52].

2.3. Conserved Glycines in the N-Terminal Domain of the CD36 Trans-Membrane Sequence

The N-terminal region for vertebrate CD36 sequences (residues 1-29 for human CD36) contained cytoplasmic (residues 2-7) and trans-membrane (residues 8-29) motifs which underwent changes in amino acid sequence but retained predicted cytoplasmic and trans-membrane properties in each case, respectively (Figure 1). Vertebrate N-terminal trans-membrane sequences, in particular, were predominantly conserved, especially for CD36 Gly12, Gly16 and Gly24/Gly25 residues, which were observed among the vertebrate CD36 sequences examined (Figure 1). Site directed mutagenesis studies of the related human SCARB1 sequence have demonstrated key roles for N-terminus trans-membrane sequence glycine residues, by facilitating oligomerisation and selective lipid uptake by SCARB1 conserved glycine residues [53] and similar roles may apply to the conserved C-terminal domain CD36 glycine residues. A recent report has shown, however, that CD36 is capable of binding acetylated and oxidized low-density lipoproteins as a monomer, even though multiple homo- and hetero-protein interactions are formed in the plasma membrane [8]. A conserved glycine residue was also observed for the vertebrate C-terminal trans-membrane sequences (human CD36 Gly452) (Figure 1), however the role for this residue has not been investigated.
Table 2. Predicted N-glycosylation sites for CD36 sequences. Numbers refer to amino acids in the acid sequences, including N-asparagine; K-lysine; I-isoleucine; H-histidine; S-serine; T-threonine; Q-glutamine; D-aspartate; Y-tyrosine; and V-valine. Note that there are 25 potential sites identified for vertebrate CD36 and other CD36-like sequences, including 10 sites for human CD36 (see [49]). N-glycosylation sites were identified using the NetNGlyc 1.0 web server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc/). Higher probability N-glycosylation sites are in bold.
Table 2. Predicted N-glycosylation sites for CD36 sequences. Numbers refer to amino acids in the acid sequences, including N-asparagine; K-lysine; I-isoleucine; H-histidine; S-serine; T-threonine; Q-glutamine; D-aspartate; Y-tyrosine; and V-valine. Note that there are 25 potential sites identified for vertebrate CD36 and other CD36-like sequences, including 10 sites for human CD36 (see [49]). N-glycosylation sites were identified using the NetNGlyc 1.0 web server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc/). Higher probability N-glycosylation sites are in bold.
VertebrateSpeciesSite 1Site 2*Site 3Site 4Site 5Site 6Site 7Site 8Site 9Site 10Site 11Site12Site 13
CD36
Human Homo sapiens 79NSSN102NVTQ 134NFTV163NKSK
ChimpPan troglodytes 79NSSN102NVTQ 134NFTV163NKSK
OrangutanPongo abelii 79NSSN102NVTQ 134NFTV163NKSK
GibbonNomascus leucogenys 79NSSN102NVTQ 134NFTV163NKSK
RhesusMacaca mulatta 79NSSN102NITQ 134NFTV163NKSK
MarmosetCallithrix jacchus 79NSSN102NVTQ 134NFTV
MouseMus musculus 79NSSK102NITQ 134NFTV
RatRattus norvegicus 79NSSK102NITQ 134NFTV
Guinea PigCavia porcellus 79NSSN102NVTQ 132NDTF 172NRTL
CowBos taurus 79NSSK102NITQ 172NRTL
HorseEquus caballus 79NSSK102NITH109NHTV 134NDTF
DogCanis familaris 79NSSK102NITH 172NRTV
PigSus scrofa 79NSSV102NITQ 132NDTF
RabbitOryctolagus cuniculus 79NSSN102NVTQ 132NDTF
ElephantLoxodonta africana 79NSSN102NITQ 132NDTF
PandaAiluropoda melanoleuca 79NSSA102NITH 132NDTL
OpossumMonodelphis domestica 79NSTK102NLTQ 131NDSF
PlatypusOrnithorhynchus anatinus 79NNSK102NITK
ChickenGallus gallus46NGTI72NPSD 102NITE108NGTI 131NDTI 171NRTV
Zebra finchTaeniopygia guttata46NGGT72NPSE 102NVTE108NGTI 131NDTL 171NRTV
LizardAnolis carolensis46NGTI 79NGSQ102NITH 131NDTF
FrogXenopus tropicalis 101NITQ107NNTV 162NSSL
ZebrafishDanio rerio47NGTL 103NITF109NNTV 168NRTV
TetraodonTetraodon nigroviridis 77NGTT100NVTY105NDST 162NSSL
Sea squirtCiona intestinalis 74NVTN 120NKTY 143NGSE
LanceletBranchiostoma floridae 100NITF106NGTV122NMSF 129NDTF
Fruit flyDrosophila melanogaster 80NVTN90NGSK 118NGTL
VertebrateSpeciesSite 14Site 15Site 16Site 17Site 18Site 19Site 20Site 21Site 22Site 23Site 24Site 25No of
CD36 Sites
Human Homo sapiens 205NNTA 220NISK 235NLSY 247NGTD 321NCTS 417NETG10
ChimpPan troglodytes 205NNTA 220NISK 235NLSY 247NGTD 321NCTS 417NETG10
OrangutanPongo abelii 205NNTA 235NLSY 247NGTD 321NCTS 417NETG9
GibbonNomascus leucogenys 205NNTA 235NLSY 247NGTD 321NCTS 417NETG9
RhesusMacaca mulatta 205NNTA 235NLSY 247NGTD 321NCTS 417NETG9
MarmosetCallithrix jacchus 205NNTA 235NLSY 247NGTD 321NCTS 417NETG9
MouseMus musculus 205NDTV 220NISK 235NLSY 247NGTD 321NCTS 417NETG9
RatRattus norvegicus 205NNTV 220NISK 235NLSY 247NGTD 321NCTS 417NETG9
Guinea PigCavia porcellus 205NNTA 220NISK 235NLSY 247NGTD 321NCTS 417NETG10
CowBos taurus 205NNTA 235NLSY 247NGTD 321NCTS 417NETG8
HorseEquus caballus 205NNTV 220NISK 235NLSY 247NGTD 321NCTS 417NETG10
DogCanis familaris 205NNTV 220NVSQ 235NLSY 247NGTD 321NCTS 417NETG9
PigSus scrofa 205NNTS206NTSD 235NLSY 247NGTD 321NCTS 417NETG9
RabbitOryctolagus cuniculus 205NNTV 220NISK 235NLSY 247NGTD 321NCTS 417NETG9
ElephantLoxodonta africana 205NNTV 235NLSY 247NGTD 321NCTS 417NETG8
PandaAiluropoda melanoleuca 208NNTA 238NLSY 250NGTD 324NCTS 420NETG8
OpossumMonodelphis domestica 204NNTV 234NLSF 246NGTD 320NCTS 416NETG8
PlatypusOrnithorhynchus anatinus 204NNTA 234NLSY 246NGTD 320NCTS 416NETG7
ChickenGallus gallus 204NGTS 234NLSY 246NGTD 320NCTL 416NETA10
Zebra finchTaeniopygia guttata 205NGTS 247NGTD 321NCTI 417NESA9
LizardAnolis carolensis 205NETL 232NKSM 247NTGD 321NCTG 417NETA9
FrogXenopus tropicalis 202NGTA 245NGTD 319NCTA 415NETA7
ZebrafishDanio rerio 194NGTV 229NDSY237NGSD 311NCTL 406NETA9
TetraodonTetraodon nigroviridis 200NGTA 228NRTV243NGTD 317NCTL 416NETA9
Sea squirtCiona intestinalis 232NQSR 260NMSE 276NGTD346NHTV 7
LanceletBranchiostoma floridae182NDSL211NGTD 255NGTD 333NISI420NEST9
Fruit flyDrosophila melanogaster 223NGTS 347NVSL 5

2.4. Conserved Vertebrate CD36 Cysteine Residues

Ten cysteine residues of the vertebrate CD36 sequences were conserved, including two within each of the N- (Cys3 and Cys7) and C-terminal (Cys464 and Cys466) cytoplasmic sequences, and six within the vertebrate exoplasmic sequences (Cys243; Cys272; Cys311; Cys313; Cys322; and Cys333) (Figure 1). The CD36 N- and C-terminal conserved cytoplasmic cysteine residues have been shown to be palmitoylated [47], which may contribute to protein-protein interactions, protein trafficking and membrane localization [54]. Comparative studies of vertebrate SCARB1 sequences have shown that N- and C-terminal cytoplasmic sequences lacked any conserved cysteine residues in this region [55]. The six conserved exoplasmic vertebrate CD36 cysteine residues participate in disulfide bridge formation for bovine CD36 (Cys243-Cys311; Cys272-Cys333; and Cys313-Cys322), resulting in a 1-3, 2-6 and 4-5 arrangement of the disulfide bridges [49]. In contrast, vertebrate SCARB1 exoplasmic sequences contain only four conserved cysteine residues forming disulfide bridges (Cys281; Cys321; Cys323; and Cys334); a fifth cysteine (Cys251) was not conserved among vertebrate SCARB1 sequences [55]; and a conserved sixth cysteine (not observed in the CD36 sequence) (human SCARB1 Cys384) which functions in lipid transfer activity [56,57].

2.5. Predicted Secondary Structures for Vertebrate CD36

Predicted secondary structures for vertebrate CD36 sequences were examined (Figure 1), particularly for the exoplasmic sequences. α-Helix and β-sheet structures were similar in each case, with a α-helix extending beyond the N-terminal and C-terminal trans-membrane regions, forming α1 and α7, respectively. A consistent sequence of predicted secondary structure was observed for each of the vertebrate CD36 sequences: N-terminal cytoplasmic sequence--N-terminal transmembrane sequence--α1--β1--α2--β2--β3--β4--β5--β6--α3--β7--α4--β8--β10--β11--β12--β13--β14--β15--α5--C-terminal trans-membrane sequence--C-terminal cytoplasmic sequence. Further description of the secondary and tertiary structures for CD36 must await the determination of the three dimensional structure for this protein, particularly for the exoplasmic region which directly binds oxidized LDL lipids and a wide range of other lipid-like structures, including long chain fatty acids [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10].

2.6. Conserved Proline, Glycine and Charged Amino Acid Residues within the CD36 Exoplasmic Domain

Supplementary Figure 1 shows the alignment of 7 vertebrate CD36 amino acid sequences for the exoplasmic domain with colors depicting the properties of individual amino acids and conservation observed for some of these protein sequences. In addition to the key vertebrate CD36 amino acids detailed previously, others were also conserved, including 17 proline residues. A human CD36 genetic deficiency of one of these conserved prolines (Pro90→Ser) confirmed the significance of this residue, which lacked platelet CD36 [56]. Human CD36 deficiency has been shown to cause systemic metabolic changes in glucose and long chain fatty acid metabolism [59]. Prolines play a major role in protein folding and protein-protein interactions, involving the cyclic pyrrolidine amino acid side chain, which may introduce turns (or kinks) in the polypeptide chain as well as having destabilizing effects on α-helix and β-strand conformations [60]. In addition, the presence of sequential prolines within a protein sequence may confer further restriction in folding conformation and create a distinctive structure, such as that reported for the mammalian Na+/H+ exchanger, which plays a major role in cation transport [61]. Sequential prolines (Pro258-Pro259) were conserved for 6 of 7 vertebrate CD36 sequences examined and these may confer a distinctive conformation in this region supporting the lipid receptor functions for this protein. Moreover, regions of water exposed proteins with high levels of proline residues are often sites for protein-protein interactions [62] and these residues may significantly contribute to the binding of lipoproteins by the exoplasmic region of CD36. Similar results have been recently reported for the vertebrate SCARB1 exoplasmic region, however in this case, 30 conserved proline residues were observed [55].
Supplementary Figure 1 also shows conservation of 14 glycine residues for vertebrate CD36 exoplasmic domains, which due to their small size, may be essential for static turns, bends or close packing in the domain, or required for conformational dynamics during long chain fatty acid receptor on-off switching, as in the case of the aspartate receptor protein [63]. Both proline and glycine residues are frequently found in turn and loop structures of proteins, and usually influence short loop formation within proteins containing between 2 and 10 amino acids [61]. Evidence for these short loop structures within vertebrate CD36 exoplasmic sequences was evident from the predicted secondary structures for vertebrate CD36 (Figure 1), with proline and/or glycine residues found at the start of the following structures: α1 (Pro28; Gly30), β1 (Gly58), α2 (Pro73), β3 (Gly89-Pro90), β8 (Gly210), β12 (Gly287) and α5 (Gly420; Gly423). Moreover, CD36 sequential proline residues (Pro255-Pro256) were located in a region with no predicted secondary structure (between β9 and β10) but with disulfide bonds, which suggests that this is a region of conformational significance for CD36.
In addition to the prolines and glycine residues for the vertebrate exoplasmic CD36 sequences, there are several conserved charged amino acid residue positions, including positively charged Lys40/Lys41 located within the first predicted exoplasmic helix (α1); Arg/Lys89, Arg95; Arg97 and Lys101 within or near the predicted strand-β3/strand β4 THP-binding domain region; Lys233/Lys235/Arg236 near the PE-binding domain; Lys263 located near the β10 strand; Arg276 within the β11 strand and adjacent to a disulphide bond; Lys288 which lies between predicted β11 and β12 strands; Lys337 and Arg/Lys340 near a disulphide bond; Lys388/Arg389 near the predicted β15 strand; and Lys401/Lys409 within the last exoplasmic helix (α5). Two domains of the exoplasmic CD36 sequence have been potentially implicated in the binding and endocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils: residues 155-183; and 93-120 (see [7]) The latter domain is called CLESH (for CD36 LIMP-II Emp [erythrocyte membrane protein] sequence homology) which is predominantly conserved, particularly near Thr92, which is phosphorylated by protein kinase C alpha and contributes to the suppression of thrombospondin-1 binding in vitro [48]. One or more of these positively charged CD36 exoplasmic regions may contribute to long chain fatty acid binding prior to the translocation of fatty acids inside the cell membrane. There are also several conserved acidic amino acid regions, particularly a sequence of three acidic amino acids (367Asp/68Asp/369Asp) near the β13 predicted strand. The conserved nature of these CD36 charged residues suggests that play key functional roles for this cell membrane protein, which may include serving as the long chain fatty acid CD36 receptor site.

2.7. Alignments of Human CD36, SCARB1 and SCARB2

The amino acid sequences for human CD36, SCARB1 and SCARB2 (see Table 1) are aligned in Figure 2. The sequences were 30-33% identical and showed similarities in several key features and residues, including cytoplasmic N-terminal and C-terminal residues; N-terminal and C-terminal trans-membrane helical regions; exoplasmic disulfide bond forming residues, previously identified for bovine CD36: Cys243-Cys311; Cys272-Cys333; and Cys313-Cys322 [47]; several predicted N-glycosylation sites for human CD36 (10 sites), SCARB1 (9 sites) and SCARB2 (9 sites), of which only two are shared between these sequences (N-glycosylation sites 15 and 21 (Table 2); and similar predicted secondary structures previously identified for SCARB1 [55] (Figure 1). The Cys384 residue, for which the free-SH group plays a major role in SCARB1-mediated lipid transport [57], was unique to SCARB1, being replaced by other residues for the corresponding CD36 and SCARB2 proteins (Phe383 and Ala379, respectively). N-terminal trans-membrane glycine residues, which play a role in the formation of SCARB1 oligomers [53], were also observed for the human CD36 sequence, with twin-glycines (Gly23-Gly24) conserved for the vertebrate CD36 sequences (Figure 1). In contrast, only one of these glycines (Gly10) was observed for the human SCARB2 sequence. These results suggest that human CD36, SCARB1 and SCARB2 proteins share several important properties, features and conserved residues, including being membrane-bound with cytoplasmic and transmembrane regions, having similar secondary structures, but being significantly different to serve distinct functions.
Alignments were also prepared for the predicted lancelet (Branchiostoma floridae) and sea squirt (Ciona intestinalis) CD36-like sequences and a major epithelial membrane protein (EMP) from fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) (FBpp0072309) with the human CD36, SCARB1 and SCARB2 sequences (Figure 2). The lancelet, sea squirt and fruit fly sequences examined shared many features with the CD36-like human sequences, including the N- and C-terminal cytoplasmic and transmembrane sequences; similarities in predicted secondary structures; positional identities for five conserved cysteine residues, indicating conservation of at least 2 disulfide bridges for these proteins; predicted N-glycosylation sites, including one which is shared across all 6 CD-like sequences (site 15 in Table 2); and trans-membrane glycine residues, which were observed in both the N- and C-terminal sequences.

2.8. Gene Locations and Exonic Structures for Vertebrate CD36 Genes

Table 1 summarizes the predicted locations for vertebrate CD36 genes based upon BLAT interrogations of several vertebrate genomes using the reported human CD36 sequence [45] and the predicted sequences for other vertebrate CD36 genes and the UC Santa Cruz genome browser [64]. Vertebrate CD36 genes were transcribed on either the positive strand (e.g., human, chimpanzee, gibbon, rhesus, rat and dog genomes) or the negative strand (e.g., mouse, cow, pig, opossum, chicken, frog and zebrafish genomes). Figure 1 summarizes the predicted exonic start sites for human, mouse, cow, opossum, chicken, frog and zebrafish CD36 genes with each having 12 coding exons, in identical or similar positions to those reported for the human CD36 gene [28].
Figure 2. Amino Acid Sequence Alignments for Human CD36, SCARB1, and SCARB2; and Lancelet, Sea Squirt and Fruit Fly CD36-like Sequences. See Table 1 for sources of CD36-like sequences; HuCD36-human CD36; HuSCA1-human SCARB1; HuSCA2-human SCARB2; LaCD36-lancelet CD36; SsCD36- sea squirt CD36; DmEMP1-fruit fly endothelial membrane protein; * shows identical residues for subunits; : similar alternate residues; . dissimilar alternate residues; predicted cytoplasmic residues are shown in Biomolecules 02 00389 i001; predicted trans-membrane residues are shown in Biomolecules 02 00389 i002; N-glycosylated and potential N-glycosylated Asn sites are shown in Biomolecules 02 00389 i003; free-SH Cys involved in lipid transfer for human SCARB1 is shown in Biomolecules 02 00389 i004; predicted disulfide bond Cys residues are shown in Biomolecules 02 00389 i005; predicted α-helices for CD36-like sequences are in Biomolecules 02 00389 i006 and numbered in sequence from the start of the predicted exoplasmic domain; predicted β-sheets are in Biomolecules 02 00389 i007 and also numbered in sequence; bold underlined font shows residues corresponding to known or predicted exon start sites; exon numbers are shown; Biomolecules 02 00389 i008 residues refer to conserved glycines in the N- and C-terminal oligomerisation domains of the trans-membrane sequence [49]; C-terminal SCARB1 Biomolecules 02 00389 i009 residues refer to PDZ-binding domain sequences [18,19].
Figure 2. Amino Acid Sequence Alignments for Human CD36, SCARB1, and SCARB2; and Lancelet, Sea Squirt and Fruit Fly CD36-like Sequences. See Table 1 for sources of CD36-like sequences; HuCD36-human CD36; HuSCA1-human SCARB1; HuSCA2-human SCARB2; LaCD36-lancelet CD36; SsCD36- sea squirt CD36; DmEMP1-fruit fly endothelial membrane protein; * shows identical residues for subunits; : similar alternate residues; . dissimilar alternate residues; predicted cytoplasmic residues are shown in Biomolecules 02 00389 i001; predicted trans-membrane residues are shown in Biomolecules 02 00389 i002; N-glycosylated and potential N-glycosylated Asn sites are shown in Biomolecules 02 00389 i003; free-SH Cys involved in lipid transfer for human SCARB1 is shown in Biomolecules 02 00389 i004; predicted disulfide bond Cys residues are shown in Biomolecules 02 00389 i005; predicted α-helices for CD36-like sequences are in Biomolecules 02 00389 i006 and numbered in sequence from the start of the predicted exoplasmic domain; predicted β-sheets are in Biomolecules 02 00389 i007 and also numbered in sequence; bold underlined font shows residues corresponding to known or predicted exon start sites; exon numbers are shown; Biomolecules 02 00389 i008 residues refer to conserved glycines in the N- and C-terminal oligomerisation domains of the trans-membrane sequence [49]; C-terminal SCARB1 Biomolecules 02 00389 i009 residues refer to PDZ-binding domain sequences [18,19].
Biomolecules 02 00389 g002
Figure 3 shows the predicted structures of mRNAs for two major human CD36 transcripts and the major Cd36 transcripts for mouse and rat Cd36 genes [46,65,66]. The human transcripts were ~2 kbs in length with 14 (isoform c) or 15 (isoform e) introns present for these CD36 mRNA transcripts and in each case, a 3’-untranslated region (UTR) was observed. The human CD36 genome sequence contained a number of predicted transcription factor binding sites (TFBS), including the dual promoter structure of PPARA (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α) and PPARG (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ) sites [67,68]. Moreover, the mouse Cd36 gene is regulated in a tissue specific manner by PPARA in liver and by PPARG in adipose tissues [69]. Other TFBS sites predicted for the human CD36 5’ promoter region included RSRFC4, a myocyte enhancer factor 2A found in muscle-specific and ‘immediate early’ genes [70]; CART1, a paired-class homeodomain transcription factor [71]; FOXJ2, a fork head transcriptional activator which is active during early development [72]; XBP1, a transcription factor which is critical for cell fate determination in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress [73]; and CDC5, a transcription activator and cell cycle regulator [74]. Hepatic upregulation of CD36 transcription in human patients has been recently shown to be significantly associated with insulin resistance, hyperinsulinaemia and increased steatosis in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and chronic hepatitis C [43].
Figure 3. Gene Structures and Major Splicing Transcripts for the Human, Mouse and Rat CD36 Genes. Derived from the AceView website http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/IEB/Research/Acembly/ mature isoform variants are shown with capped 5’- and 3’- ends for the predicted mRNA sequences [62]; NM refers to the NCBI reference sequence; exons are in pink; the directions for transcription are shown as 5’ → 3’; sizes of mRNA sequences are shown in kilobases (kb); predicted transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) for human Cd36 are shown: CART1- a paired-class homeodomain transcription factor [71]; RSRFC4-myocyte enhancement factor 2A transcription factor [70]; XBP1-transcription factor [73]; FOXJ2-fork-head transcription factor [72]; CDC5-transcription activator and cell cycle regulator; [74]; PPARA-peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha; and PPARG-peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma [67,68].
Figure 3. Gene Structures and Major Splicing Transcripts for the Human, Mouse and Rat CD36 Genes. Derived from the AceView website http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/IEB/Research/Acembly/ mature isoform variants are shown with capped 5’- and 3’- ends for the predicted mRNA sequences [62]; NM refers to the NCBI reference sequence; exons are in pink; the directions for transcription are shown as 5’ → 3’; sizes of mRNA sequences are shown in kilobases (kb); predicted transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) for human Cd36 are shown: CART1- a paired-class homeodomain transcription factor [71]; RSRFC4-myocyte enhancement factor 2A transcription factor [70]; XBP1-transcription factor [73]; FOXJ2-fork-head transcription factor [72]; CDC5-transcription activator and cell cycle regulator; [74]; PPARA-peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha; and PPARG-peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma [67,68].
Biomolecules 02 00389 g003

2.9. Comparative Human and Mouse CD36 Tissue Expression

Figure 4 presents ‘heat maps’ showing comparative gene expression for various human and mouse tissues obtained from GNF Expression Atlas Data using the U133A and GNF1H (human) and GNF1M (mouse) chips (http://genome.ucsc.edu; http://biogps.gnf.org) [75]. These data supported a broad and high level of tissue expression for human and mouse CD36, particularly for adipose tissue, heart, skeletal muscle and liver, which is consistent with previous reports for these genes [11,32,66]. Overall, human and mouse CD36 tissue expressions levels were 4-6 times the average level of gene expression which supports the key role played by this enzyme in fatty acid metabolism, especially in liver, muscle and adipose tissue.
Figure 4. Comparative Tissue Expression for Human and Mouse CD36 Genes. Expression ‘heat maps’ (GNF Expression Atlas 2 data) (http://biogps.gnf.org) were examined for comparative gene expression levels among human and mouse tissues for CD36 genes showing high (red); intermediate (black); and low (green) expression levels [75]. Derived from human and mouse genome browsers (http://genome.ucsc.edu) [64].
Figure 4. Comparative Tissue Expression for Human and Mouse CD36 Genes. Expression ‘heat maps’ (GNF Expression Atlas 2 data) (http://biogps.gnf.org) were examined for comparative gene expression levels among human and mouse tissues for CD36 genes showing high (red); intermediate (black); and low (green) expression levels [75]. Derived from human and mouse genome browsers (http://genome.ucsc.edu) [64].
Biomolecules 02 00389 g004
The broad tissue and high level of gene expression reported for human and mouse CD36 reflects key roles for this major cell membrane and muscle outer mitochondrial membrane glycoprotein in fatty acyl translocation and as a multiple ligand cell surface receptor of oxidized LDL lipoproteins (ox-LDL) and long chain fatty acids [7,11,33,66]. CD36 has also been described as a lipid ‘sensor’ playing a lipid receptor role for cells and tissues of the body [8,40]. Moreover, CD36 upregulation is associated with insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia, leading to liver pathology and increased steatosis [43]. In addition, cardiomyocyte CD36 cell surface recruitment is induced by insulin, AMP-dependent protein kinase (AMPK) activity or contraction, and is regulated in its vesicular trafficking by the RabGAP-AS160 substrate and AS160-Rab8a GTPase activating protein (GAP) [76,77,78]. These features provide a link between cell membrane CD36 and the reported insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of AS160 involved with the translocation of the glucose transporter GLUT4 to the plasma membrane [79,80]. It is also relevant to report that plasma levels of soluble CD36 are increased in type 2 diabetic patients [81].
Significant levels of CD36 expression have also been described in brain tissues, where CD36 contributes to cerebrovascular oxidative stress and neurovascular dysfunction induced by amyloid-beta in Alzeheimer’s dementia [12,13], and in transporting long chain fatty acids across the blood-brain barrier [82].

2.10. Phylogeny of Vertebrate CD36-Like Sequences

A phylogenetic tree (Figure 5) was calculated by the progressive alignment of 21 vertebrate CD36 amino acid sequences with human, mouse, chicken and zebrafish SCARB1 and SCARB2 sequences. The phylogenetic tree was ‘rooted’ with the lancelet (Branchiostoma floridae) CD36 sequence (see Table 1). The phylogenetic tree showed clustering of the CD36 sequences into groups which were consistent with their evolutionary relatedness as well as groups for human, mouse, chicken and zebrafish SCARB1 and SCARB2 sequences, which were distinct from the lancelet CD36 sequence. These groups were significantly different from each other (with bootstrap values of ~100/100) with the clustering observed supporting a closer phylogenetic relationship between CD36 and SCARB2, with the SCARB1 gene being more distantly related. This is suggestive of a sequence of CD36-like gene duplication events: ancestral CD36 gene duplication → SCARB1 and CD36 genes; followed by a further CD36 duplication, generating the SCARB2 and CD36 genes found in all vertebrate species examined (Figure 5). It is apparent from this study of vertebrate CD36-like genes and proteins that this is an ancient protein for which a proposed common ancestor for the CD36, SCARB1 and SCARB2 genes may have predated the appearance of fish > 500 million years ago [83]. In parallel with the evolution of CD36 and other CD36-like proteins (SCARB1 and SCARB2), thrombospondins (TSPs) are also undergoing evolutionary changes in their structures and functions [84], with gene duplication events proposed at the origin of deuterostomes.

3. Methods

3.1. Vertebrate CD36 Gene and Protein Identification

BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) studies were undertaken using web tools from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) [85]. Protein BLAST analyses used vertebrate CD36 amino acid sequences previously described [8,45] (Table 1). Non-redundant protein sequence databases for several vertebrate genomes were examined using the blastp algorithm from sources previously described [55]. This procedure produced multiple BLAST ‘hits’ for each of the protein databases which were individually examined and retained in FASTA format, and a record kept of the sequences for predicted mRNAs and encoded CD36-like proteins. Predicted CD36-like protein sequences were obtained in each case and subjected to analyses of predicted protein and gene structures.
Figure 5. Phylogenetic Tree of Vertebrate CD36 Amino Acid Sequences with Human, Mouse, Chicken and Zebrafish SCARB1 and SCARB2 Sequences. The tree is labeled with the CD36-like gene name and the name of the animal and is ‘rooted’ with the lancelet CD36 sequence. Note the 3 major clusters corresponding to the CD36, SCARB1 and SCARB2 gene families. A genetic distance scale is shown. The number of times a clade (sequences common to a node or branch) occurred in the bootstrap replicates are shown. Only highly significant replicate values of 95 or more are shown with 100 bootstrap replicates performed in each case. A proposed sequence of CD36 gene duplication events is shown.
Figure 5. Phylogenetic Tree of Vertebrate CD36 Amino Acid Sequences with Human, Mouse, Chicken and Zebrafish SCARB1 and SCARB2 Sequences. The tree is labeled with the CD36-like gene name and the name of the animal and is ‘rooted’ with the lancelet CD36 sequence. Note the 3 major clusters corresponding to the CD36, SCARB1 and SCARB2 gene families. A genetic distance scale is shown. The number of times a clade (sequences common to a node or branch) occurred in the bootstrap replicates are shown. Only highly significant replicate values of 95 or more are shown with 100 bootstrap replicates performed in each case. A proposed sequence of CD36 gene duplication events is shown.
Biomolecules 02 00389 g005
BLAT (Blast-like Alignment Tool) analyses were subsequently undertaken for each of the predicted CD36 amino acid sequences using the UC Santa Cruz Genome Browser [64] with the default settings to obtain the predicted locations for each of the vertebrate CD36 genes, including predicted exon boundary locations and gene sizes. BLAT analyses were similarly undertaken for vertebrate SCARB1 and SCARB2 genes using previously reported sequences in each case (see Table 1). Structures for human and mouse isoforms (splicing variants) for human CD36, mouse Cd36 and rat Cd36 were obtained using the AceView website to examine predicted gene and protein structures [66].

3.2. Predicted Structures and Properties of Vertebrate CD36

Predicted secondary structures for vertebrate CD36 proteins, human SCARB1 and SCARB2, lancelet (Branchiostoma floridae) CD36, sea squirt (Ciona intestinalis) CD36 and a fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) epithelial membrane protein (FBpp0072309) were obtained using the PSIPRED v2.5 web site tools provided by Brunel University [86]. Molecular weights, N-glycosylation sites [49] and predicted trans-membrane, cytosolic and exocellular sequences for vertebrate SCARB1 proteins were obtained using Expasy web tools (http://au.expasy.org/tools/pi_tool.html).

3.3. Comparative Human and Mouse CD36 Gene Expression

The genome browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu) [62] was used to examine GNF Expression Atlas 2 data using various expression chips for human and mouse CD36 genes (http://biogps.gnf.org) [74]. Gene array expression ‘heat maps’ were examined for comparative gene expression levels among human and mouse tissues showing high (red); intermediate (black); and low (green) expression levels.

3.4. Phylogeny Studies and Sequence Divergence

Alignments of vertebrate CD36, SCARB1 and SCARB2 sequences were assembled using BioEdit v.5.0.1 and the default settings [87]. Alignment ambiguous regions, including the amino and carboxyl termini, were excluded prior to phylogenetic analysis yielding alignments of 431 residues for comparisons of vertebrate CD36 sequences with human, mouse, chicken and zebra-fish SCARB1 and SCARB2 sequences with the lancelet (Branchiostoma floridae) CD36 sequence (Table 1). Evolutionary distances and phylogenetic trees were calculated as previously described [85]. Tree topology was reexamined by the boot-strap method (100 bootstraps were applied) of resampling and only values that were highly significant (≥95) are shown [88].

4. Conclusions

The results of this study indicate that vertebrate CD36 genes and encoded proteins represent a distinct gene and protein family of CD36-like proteins which share key conserved sequences that have been reported for other CD36-like proteins (SCARB1 and SCARB2) previously studied [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. CD36 has a unique property among these proteins in serving a major role in fatty acyl translocation and as a multiple ligand cell surface receptor of oxidized LDL lipoproteins (ox-LDL), long chain fatty acids, aged neutrophils and Plasmodium falciparum-parasitized erythrocytes [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. CD36 is encoded by a single gene among the vertebrate genomes studied and is highly expressed in human and mouse tissues, particularly in adipose tissue, heart, skeletal muscle and liver, and usually contain 12 coding exons. Predicted secondary structures for vertebrate CD36 proteins showed strong similarities with other CD36-like proteins, SCARB1 and SCARB2. Three major structural domains were observed for vertebrate CD36 sequences, including N- and C-terminal cytoplasmic domains; N- and C-terminal trans-membrane domains; and an exoplasmic domain, which serves as the ‘receptor’ for long chain fatty acids and thrombospondins [5,6,7,8,14,32]. The latter domain contained three disulfide bridges [49]; several N-glycosylation sites for glycan binding (7–10 sites), which are essential for membrane recruitment [52]; 17 conserved proline and 14 glycine residues, which may contribute to short loop structures for the CD36 exoplasmic structure; and several conserved basic amino acid sites, which may promote long chain fatty acid binding. Phylogenetic studies using 21 vertebrate CD36 sequences with human, mouse, chicken and zebrafish SCARB1 and SCARB2 sequences indicated that the CD36 gene appeared early in evolution, prior to the appearance of bony fish more that 500 million years ago, and has undergone at least two gene duplication events: ancestral CD36 → vertebrate SCARB1 and CD36; with the latter gene undergoing a further gene duplication generating vertebrate CD36 and SCARB2 genes.

Supplementary

Supplementary Figure 1. Amino Acid Sequence Alignments for Vertebrate CD36 Exoplasmic Sequences. Amino acids are color coded: yellow for proline (P); S (serine); green for hydrophilic amino acids, S (serine), Q (glutamine), N (asparagine), and T (threonine); brown for glycine (G); light blue for hydrophobic amino acids, L (leucine), I (isoleucine), V (valine), M (methionine), W (tryptophan); dark blue for amino acids, T (tyrosine) and H (histidine); purple for acidic amino acids, E (glutamate) and D (aspartate); and red for basic amino acids, K (lysine) and R (arginine); conserved prolines and glycines are designated as P1, P2 etc and G1, G2 etc, respectively. Numbers refer to human CD36 amino acid sequence.
Supplementary Figure 1. Amino Acid Sequence Alignments for Vertebrate CD36 Exoplasmic Sequences. Amino acids are color coded: yellow for proline (P); S (serine); green for hydrophilic amino acids, S (serine), Q (glutamine), N (asparagine), and T (threonine); brown for glycine (G); light blue for hydrophobic amino acids, L (leucine), I (isoleucine), V (valine), M (methionine), W (tryptophan); dark blue for amino acids, T (tyrosine) and H (histidine); purple for acidic amino acids, E (glutamate) and D (aspartate); and red for basic amino acids, K (lysine) and R (arginine); conserved prolines and glycines are designated as P1, P2 etc and G1, G2 etc, respectively. Numbers refer to human CD36 amino acid sequence.
Biomolecules 02 00389 g006
Supplementary Table 1. CD36, SCARB1 and SCARB2 proteins: subunit MWs and percentage identities. High % identities are in bold.
Supplementary Table 1. CD36, SCARB1 and SCARB2 proteins: subunit MWs and percentage identities. High % identities are in bold.
CD36 GeneSpeciesSubunit MW% Identity with human% Identity with human% Identity with human
SCARB1SCARB2CD36
Human Homo sapiens53,0533130100
ChimpanzeePan troglodytes53,064 3130100
OrangutanPongo abelii53,039 323097
GibbonNomascus leucogenys53,161 323096
RhesusMacaca mulatta53,041 323194
MouseMus musculus52,698303183
RatRattus norvegicus52,731 313086
Guinea PigCavia porcellus53,085 323281
CowBos taurus52,940 323082
DogCanis familaris52,549 313082
PigSus scrofa53,085 313082
RabbitOryctolagus cuniculus52,729 313188
HorseEquus caballus52,789 313183
ElephantLoxodonta africana52,873 313180
OpossumMonodelphis domestica53,017 303073
PlatypusOrnithorhynchus anatinus52,807 313073
ChickenGallus gallus52,624303261
LizardAnolis carolinensis52,890 313161
FrogXenopus tropicalis52,696 302955
ZebrafishDanio rerio51,590 313153
SCARB1 GeneSpeciesSubunit MW% Identity with human% Identity with human% Identity with human
SCARB1SCARB2CD36
HumanHomo sapiens56,973 1002931
MouseMus musculus56,754 792929
ChickenGallus gallus55,918 572831
ZebrafishDanio rerio55,742 512830
SCARB2 Gene
HumanHomo sapiens54,290 2910030
MouseMus musculus54,044 298531
ChickenGallus gallus53,907305933
ZebrafishDanio rerio60,234 314333
CD36 Gene
LanceletBranchiostoma floridae54,141343535
Sea squirtCiona intestinalis58,009 263331
NematodeCaenorhabditis elegans60,182 212624
Fruit flyDrosophila melanogaster58,663202326

Acknowledgements

The expert assistance of Bharet Patel of Griffith University with the phylogeny studies is acknowledged.

References

  1. Oquendo, P.; Hundt, E.; Lawler, J.; Seed, B. CD36 directly mediates cytoadherence of Plasmodium falciparum parasitized erythrocytes. Cell 1989, 58, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Asch, A.S.; Silbiger, S.; Heimer, E.; Nachman, R.L. Thrombospondin sequence motif (CSVTCG) is responsible for CD36 binding. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1992, 182, 1208–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Navazo, M.D.; Daviet, L.; Savill, J.; Ren, Y.; Leung, L.L.; McGregor, J.L. Identification of a domain (155-183) on CD36 implicated in the phagocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 15381–15385. [Google Scholar]
  4. Serghides, L.; Crandall, I.; Hull, E.; Kain, K.C. The Plasmodium falciparum-CD36 interaction is modified by a single amino acid substitution in CD36. Blood 1998, 92, 1814–1819. [Google Scholar]
  5. Simantov, R.; Silverstein, R.L. CD36: A critical anti-angiogenic receptor. Front. Biosci. 2003, 8, s874–s882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Adachi, H.; Tsujimoto, M. Endothelial scavenger receptors. Prog. Lipid Res. 2006, 45, 379–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Collot-Teixeira, S.; Martin, J.; McDermott-Roe, C.; Poston, R.; McGregor, J.L. CD36 and macrophages in atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc. Res. 2007, 75, 468–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Martin, C.A.; Longman, E.; Wooding, C.; Hoosdally, S.J.; Ali, S.; Aitman, T.J.; Gutmann, D.A.; Freemont, P.S.; Byrne, B.; Linton, K.J. Cd36, a class B scavenger receptor, functions as a monomer to bind acetylated and oxidized low-density lipoproteins. Protein Sci. 2007, 16, 2531–2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gautam, S.; Banerjee, M. The macrophage Ox-LDL receptor, CD36 and its association with type II diabetes mellitus. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2011, 102, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ren, Y. Peroxisome proliferator-activator receptor γ: A link between macrophage CD36 and inflammation in malaria infection. PPAR Res. 2012, 640769. [Google Scholar]
  11. Smith, B.K.; Jain, S.S.; Rimbaud, S.; Dam, A.; Quadrilatero, J.; Ventura-Clapier, R.; Bonen, A.; Holloway, G.P. FAT/CD36 is located on the outer mitochondrial membrane, upstream of long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase, and regulates palmitate oxidation. Biochem. J. 2011, 437, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Baranova, I.N.; Bocharov, A.V.; Vishnyakova, T.G.; Kurlander, R.; Chen, Z.; Fu, D.; Arias, I.M.; Csako, G.; Patterson, A.P.; Eggerman, T.L. CD36 is a novel serum amyloid A (SAA) receptor mediating SAA binding and SAA-induced signaling in human and rodent cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 8492–8506. [Google Scholar]
  13. Park, L.; Wang, G.; Zhou, P.; Zhou, J.; Pitstick, R.; Previti, M.L.; Younkin, L.; Younkin, S.G.; Van Nostrand, W.E.; Cho, S.; et al. Scavenger receptor CD36 is essential for the cerebrovascular oxidative stress and neurovascular dysfunction induced by amyloid-beta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 5063–5068. [Google Scholar]
  14. Martin, C.; Chevrot, M.; Poirier, H.; Passilly-Degrace, P.; Niot, I.; Besnard, P. CD36 as a lipid sensor. Physiol. Behav. 2011, 105, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, K.; Li, W.; Silverstein, R.L. A specific CD36-dependent signaling pathway is required for platelet activation by oxidized low-density lipoprotein. Circ. Res. 2008, 102, 1512–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Acton, S.; Osgood, D.; Donoghue, M.; Corella, D.; Pocovi, M.; Cenarro, A.; Mozas, P.; Keilty, J.; Squazzo, S.; Woolf, E.A.; et al. Association of polymorphisms at the SR-BI gene locus with plasma lipid levels and body mass index in a white population. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1999, 19, 1734–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bultel-Brienne, S.; Lestavel, S.; Pilon, A.; Laffont, I.; Tailleux, A.; Fruchart, J.C.; Siest, G.; Clavey, V. Lipid free apolipoprotein E binds to the class B Type I scavenger receptor I (SR-BI) and enhances cholesteryl ester uptake from lipoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 36092–36099. [Google Scholar]
  18. Marsche, G.; Zimmermann, R.; Horiuchi, S.; Tandon, N.N.; Sattler, W.; Malle, E. Class B scavenger receptors CD36 and SR-BI are receptors for hypochlorite-modified low density lipoprotein. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 47562–47570. [Google Scholar]
  19. Connelly, M.A.; Williams, D.L. Scavenger receptor BI: A scavenger receptor with a mission to transport high density lipoprotein lipids. Curr. Opin. Lipid. 2004, 5, 287–295. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kent, A.P.; Stylianou, I.M. Scavenger receptor class B member 1 protein: Hepatic regulation and its effects on lipids, reverse cholesterol transport, and atherosclerosis. Hep. Med.: Evid. Res. 2011, 3, 29–44. [Google Scholar]
  21. Fujita, H.; Takata, Y.; Kono, A.; Tanaka, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Himeno, M.; Kato, K. Isolation and sequencing of a cDNA clone encoding the 85 kDa human lysosomal sialoglycoprotein (hLGP85) in human metastatic pancreas islet tumor cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1992, 184, 604–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ogata, S.; Fukuda, M. Lysosomal targeting of Limp II membrane glycoprotein requires a novel Leu-Ile motif at a particular position in its cytoplasmic tail. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 5210–5217. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tabuchi, N.; Akasaki, K.; Sasaki, T.; Kanda, N.; Tsuji, H. Identification and characterization of a major lysosomal membrane glycoprotein, LGP85/LIMP II in mouse liver. J. Biochem. 1997, 122, 756–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kuronita, T.; Eskelinen, E.L.; Fujita, H.; Saftig, P.; Himeno, M.; Tanaka, Y. A role for the lysosomal membrane protein LGP85 in the biogenesis and maintenance of endosomal and lysosomal morphology. J. Cell Sci. 2002, 115, 4117–4131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lin, Y.W.; Lin, H.Y.; Tsou, Y.L.; Chitra, E.; Hsiao, K.N.; Shao, H.Y.; Liu, C.C.; Sia, C.; Chong, P.; Chow, Y.H. Human SCARB2-Mediated Entry and Endocytosis of EV71. PLoS One 2012, 7, e30507. [Google Scholar]
  26. Taylor, K.T.; Tang, Y.; Sobieski, D.A.; Lipsky, R.H. Characterization of two alternatively spliced 5'-untranslated exons of the human CD36 gene in different cell types. Gene 1993, 33, 205–212. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fernández-Ruiz, E.; Armesilla, A.L.; Sánchez-Madrid, F.; Vega, M.A. Gene encoding the collagen type I and thrombospondin receptor CD36 is located on chromosome 7q11.2. Genomics 1993, 17, 759–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Armesilla, A.L.; Vega, M.A. Structural organization of the gene for human CD36 glycoprotein. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 18985–18991. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rać, M.E.; Safranow, K.; Poncyljusz, W. Molecular basis of human CD36 gene mutations. Mol. Med. 2007, 13, 288–296. [Google Scholar]
  30. Simantov, R.; Febbraio, M.; Silverstein, R.L. The antiangiogenic effect of thrombospondin-2 is mediated by CD36 and modulated by histidine-rich glycoprotein. Matrix Biol. 2005, 24, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Seimon, T.A.; Nadolski, M.J.; Liao, X.; Magallon, J.; Nguyen, M.; Feric, N.T.; Koschinsky, M.L.; Harkewicz, R.; Witztum, J.L.; Tsimikas, S.; et al. Atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins trigger CD36-TLR2-dependent apoptosis in macrophages undergoing endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cell Metab. 2010, 12, 467–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nergiz-Unal, R.; Rademakers, T.; Cosemans, J.M.; Heemskerk, J.W. CD36 as a multiple-ligand signaling receptor in atherothrombosis. Cardiovasc. Hematol. Agents Med. Chem. 2011, 9, 42–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ruiz-Valasco, N.; Dominguez, A.; Vega, M.A. Statins upregulated CD36 expression in human monocytes, an effect strengthened when combined with PPAR-gamma ligands. Putative contribution of Rho GTPases in statin-induced expression. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2004, 67, 303–313. [Google Scholar]
  34. Liu, H.; Liu, Q.; Lei, H.; Li, X.; Chen, X. Inflammatory stress promotes lipid accumulation in the aorta and liver of SR-A/CD36 double knock-out mice. Mol. Med. Rep. 2010, 3, 1053–1061. [Google Scholar]
  35. Steinbusch, L.K.; Luiken, J.J.; Vlasblom, R.; Chabowski, A.; Hoebers, N.T.; Coumans, W.A.; Vroegrijk, I.O.; Voshol, P.J.; Ouwens, D.M.; Glatz, J.F.; et al. Absence of fatty acid transporter CD36 protects against Western-type diet-related cardiac dysfunction following pressure overload in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 301, E618–E627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kennedy, D.J.; Kashyap, S.R. Pathogenic role of scavenger receptor CD36 in the metabolic syndrome and diabetes. Metab. Syndr. Relat. Disord. 2011, 9, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lally, J.S.; Jain, S.S.; Han, X.X.; Snook, L.A.; Glatz, J.F.; Luiken, J.J.; McFarlan, J.; Holloway, G.P.; Bonen, A. Caffeine-stimulated fatty acid oxidation is blunted in CD36 null mice. Acta Physiol. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ma, X.; Bacci, S.; Mlynarski, W.; Gottardo, L.; Soccio, T.; Menzaghi, C.; Iori, E.; Lager, R.A.; Shroff, A.R.; Gervino, E.V.; et al. A common haplotype at the CD36 locus is associated with high free fatty acid levels and increased cardiovascular risk in Caucasians. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2004, 13, 2197–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yuasa-Kawase, M.; Masuda, D.; Yamashita, T.; Kawase, R.; Nakaoka, H.; Inagaki, M.; Nakatani, K.; Tsubakio-Yamamoto, K.; Ohama, T.; Matsuyama, A.; et al. Patients with CD36 Deficiency Are Associated with Enhanced Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2011, 19, 263–275. [Google Scholar]
  40. Keller, K.L.; Liang, L.C.; Sakimura, J.; May, D.; van Belle, C.; Breen, C.; Driggin, E.; Tepper, B.J.; Lanzano, P.C.; Deng, L.; et al. Common Variants in the CD36 Gene Are Associated With Oral Fat Perception, Fat Preferences, and Obesity in African Americans. Obesity 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pain, A.; Urban, B.C.; Kai, O.; Casals-Pascual, C.; Shafi, J.; Marsh, K.; Roberts, D.J. A non-sense mutation in Cd36 gene is associated with protection from severe malaria. Lancet 2001, 357, 1502–1503. [Google Scholar]
  42. Omi, K.; Ohashi, J.; Patarapotikul, J.; Hananantachai, H.; Naka, I.; Looareesuwan, S.; Tokunaga, K. CD36 polymorphism is associated with protection from cerebral malaria. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2003, 72, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Miquilena-Colina, M.E.; Lima-Cabello, E.; Sánchez-Campos, S.; García-Mediavilla, M.V.; Fernández-Bermejo, M.; Lozano-Rodríguez, T.; Vargas-Castrillón, J.; Buqué, X.; Ochoa, B.; Aspichueta, P.; et al. Hepatic fatty acid translocase CD36 upregulation is associated with insulin resistance, hyperinsulinaemia and increased steatosis in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and chronic hepatitis C. Gut 2011, 60, 1394–1402. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ashraf, M.Z.; Gupta, N. Scavenger receptors: Implications in atherothrombotic disorders. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2011, 43, 697–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tandon, N.N.; Lipsky, R.H.; Burgess, W.H.; Jamieson, G.A. Isolation and characterization of platelet glycoprotein IV (CD36). J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 7570–7575. [Google Scholar]
  46. Wyler, B.; Daviet, L.; Bortkiewicz, H.; Bordet, J.C.; McGregor, J.L. Cloning of the cDNA encoding human platelet CD36: Comparison to PCR amplified fragments of monocyte, endothelial and HEL cells. Thromb. Haemost. 1993, 70, 500–505. [Google Scholar]
  47. Tao, N.; Wagner, S.J.; Lublin, D.M. CD36 is palmitoylated on both N- and C-terminal cytoplasmic tails. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 22315–22320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chu, L.Y.; Silverstein, R.L. CD36 Ectodomain Phosphorylation Blocks Thrombospondin-1 Binding: Structure-Function Relationships and Regulation by Protein Kinase C. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2012, 32, 760–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rasmussen, J.T.; Berglund, L.; Rasmussen, M.S.; Petersen, T.E. Assignment of disulfide bridges in bovine CD36. Eur. J. Biochem. 1998, 257, 488–494. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lewandrowski, U.; Moebius, J.; Walter, U.; Sickmann, A. Elucidation of N-glycosylation sites on human platelet proteins: A glycoproteomic approach. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2006, 5, 226–233. [Google Scholar]
  51. Gupta, R.; Brunak, S. Prediction of glycosylation across the human proteome and the correlation to protein function. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 2002, 7, 310–322. [Google Scholar]
  52. Lauzier, B.; Merlen, C.; Vaillant, F.; McDuff, J.; Bouchard, B.; Beguin, P.C.; Dolinsky, V.W.; Foisy, S.; Villeneuve, L.R.; Labarthe, F.; et al. Post-translational modifications, a key process in CD36 function: Lessons from the spontaneously hypertensive rat heart. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2011, 51, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gaidukov, L.; Nager, A.R.; Xu, S.; Penman, M.; Krieger, M. Glycine dimerization motif in the N-terminal transmembrane domain of the high density lipoprotein receptor SR-BI required for normal receptor oligomerization and lipid transport. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 18452–18464. [Google Scholar]
  54. Salaun, C.; Greaves, J.; Chamberlain, L.H. The intracellular dynamic of protein palmitoylation. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 191, 1229–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Holmes, R.S.; Cox, L.A. Comparative studies of vertebrate scavenger receptor class B type 1 (SCARB1): A high density lipoprotein (HDL) binding protein. Res. Reports Biochem. 2012, 2012, 9–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Papale, G.A.; Hanson, P.J.; Sahoo, D. Extracellular disulfide bonds support scavenger receptor class B type I-mediated cholesterol transport. Biochemistry 2011, 50, 6245–6254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yua, M.; Romera, K.A.; Nielanda, T.J.F.; Xua, S.; Saenz-Vashb, V.; Penmana, M.; Yesilaltaya, A.; Carrb, S.A.; Kriegera, M. Exoplasmic cysteine Cys384 of the HDL receptor SR-BI is critical for its sensitivity to a small-molecule inhibitor and normal lipid transport activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 12243–12248. [Google Scholar]
  58. Kashiwagi, H.; Tomiyama, Y.; Honda, S.; Kosugi, S.; Shiraga, M.; Nagao, N.; Sekiguchi, S.; Kanayama, Y.; Kurata, Y.; Matsuzawa, Y. Molecular basis of CD36 deficiency. Evidence that a 478C-->T substitution (proline90-->serine) in CD36 cDNA accounts for CD36 deficiency. J. Clin. Invest. 1995, 95, 1040–1046. [Google Scholar]
  59. Yanai, H.; Chiba, H.; Fujiwara, H.; Morimoto, M.; Takahashi, Y.; Hui, S.P.; Fuda, H.; Akita, H.; Kurosawa, T.; Kobayashi, K.; Matsuno, K. Metabolic changes in human CD36 deficiency displayed by glucose loading. Thromb. Haemost. 2001, 86, 995–999. [Google Scholar]
  60. MacArthur, M.W.; Thornton, J.M. Influence of proline residues on protein conformation. J. Mol. Biol. 1991, 218, 397–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Krieger, A.; Möglich, A.; Kiefhaber, T. Effect of proline and glycine residues on dynamics and barriers of loop formation in polypeptide F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3346–3352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kay, B.K.; Williamson, M.P.; Sudol, M. The importance of being proline: The interaction of proline-rich motifs in signaling proteins with their cognate domains. FASEB. J. 2000, 14, 231–241. [Google Scholar]
  63. Coleman, M.D.; Bass, R.B.; Mehan, R.S.; Falke, J.J. Conserved glycine residues in the cytoplasmic domain of the aspartate receptor play essential roles in kinase coupling and on-off switching. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 7687–7695. [Google Scholar]
  64. Kent, W.J.; Sugnet, C.W.; Furey, T.S. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 2003, 12, 994–1006. [Google Scholar]
  65. Armesilla, A.L.; Calvo, D.; Vega, M.A. Structural and functional characterization of the human CD36 gene promoter: Identification of a proximal PEBP2/CBF site. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 7781–7787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Thierry-Mieg, D.; Thierry-Mieg, J. AceView: A comprehensive cDNA-supported gene and transcripts annotation. Genome Biol. 2006, 7, S12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sato, O.; Kuriki, C.; Fukui, Y.; Motojima, K. Dual promoter structure of mouse and human fatty acid translocase/CD36 genes and unique transcriptional activation by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha and gamma ligands. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 15703–15711. [Google Scholar]
  68. Olagnier, D.; Lavergne, R.A.; Meunier, E.; Lefèvre, L.; Dardenne, C.; Aubouy, A.; Benoit-Vical, F.; Ryffel, B.; Coste, A.; Berry, A.; et al. Nrf2, a PPARγ alternative pathway to promote CD36 expression on inflammatory macrophages: Implication for malaria. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002254. [Google Scholar]
  69. Motojima, K.; Passilly, P.; Peters, J.M.; Gonzalez, F.J.; Latruffe, N. Expression of putative fatty acid transporter genes are regulated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha and gamma activators in a tissue- and inducer-specific manner. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 16710–16714. [Google Scholar]
  70. Sharrocks, A.D.; von Hesler, F.; Shaw, P.E. The identification of elements determining the different DNA binding specificities of the MADS box proteins p67SRF and RSRFC4. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993, 21, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cai, R.L. Human CART1, a paired-class homeodomain protein, activates transcription through palindromic binding sites. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998, 250, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gómez-Ferrería, M.A.; Rey-Campos, J. Functional domains of FOXJ2. J Mol Biol. 2003, 329, 631–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. He, Y.; Sun, S.; Sha, H.; Liu, Z.; Yang, L.; Xue, Z.; Chen, H.; Qi, L. Emerging roles for XBP1, a sUPeR transcription factor. Gene Expr. 2010, 15, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Dyczkowski, J.; Vingron, M. Comparative analysis of cell cycle regulated genes in eukaryotes. Genome Inform. 2005, 16, 125–131. [Google Scholar]
  75. Su, A.I.; Wiltshire, T.; Batalov, S.; Lapp, H.; Ching, K.R.; Block, D.; Zhang, J.; Soden, R.; Hayakawa, M.; Kreiman, G.; et al. A gene atlas of the human and mouse protein encoding transcriptomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 6062–6067. [Google Scholar]
  76. Eguez, L.; Lee, A.; Chavez, J.A.; Miinea, C.P.; Kane, S.; Lienhard, G.E.; McGraw, T.E. Full intracellular retention of GLUT4 requires AS160 Rab GTPase activating protein. Cell Metab. 2005, 2, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Thong, F.S.; Bilan, P.J.; Klip, A. The Rab GTPase-activating protein AS160 integrates Akt, protein kinase C, and AMP-activated protein kinase signals regulating GLUT4 traffic. Diabetes 2007, 56, 414–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Samovski, D.; Su, X.; Xu, Y.; Abumrad, N.A.; Stahl, P.D. Insulin and AMPK regulate fatty acid translocase/CD36 plasma membrane recruitment in cardiomyocytes via RabGAP AS160 and Rab8a Rab GTPase. J. Lipid Res. 2012. [Epub ahead of print]. [Google Scholar]
  79. Sano, H.; Kane, S.; Sano, E.; Mîinea, C.P.; Asara, J.M.; Lane, W.S.; Garner, C.W.; Lienhard, G.E. Insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of a Rab GTPase-activating protein regulates GLUT4 translocation. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 14599–14602. [Google Scholar]
  80. Yuasa, T.; Uchiyama, K.; Ogura, Y.; Kimura, M.; Teshigawara, K.; Hosaka, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Obata, T.; Sano, H.; Kishi, K.; et al. The Rab GTPase-activating protein AS160 as a common regulator of insulin- and Galphaq-mediated intracellular GLUT4 vesicle distribution. Endocr. J. 2009, 56, 345–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Liani, R.; Halvorsen, B.; Sestili, S.; Handberg, A.; Santilli, F.; Vazzana, N.; Formoso, G.; Aukrust, P.; Davì, G. Plasma levels of soluble CD36, platelet activation, inflammation, and oxidative stress are increased in type 2 diabetic patients. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2012. [Epub ahead of print]. [Google Scholar]
  82. Mitchell, R.W.; On, N.H.; Del Bigio, M.R.; Miller, D.W.; Hatch, G.M. Fatty acid transport protein expression in human brain and potential role in fatty acid transport across human brain microvessel endothelial cells. J. Neurochem. 2011, 117, 735–746. [Google Scholar]
  83. Donoghue, P.C.J.; Benton, M.J. Rocks and clocks: Calibrating the tree of life using fossils and molecules. Trends Genet. 2007, 22, 424–431. [Google Scholar]
  84. Bentley, A.A.; Adams, J.C. The evolution of thrombospondins and their ligand-binding activities. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27, 2187–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Altschul, F.; Vyas, V.; Cornfield, A.; Goodin, S.; Ravikumar, T.S.; Rubin, E.H.; Gupta, E. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar]
  86. McGuffin, L.J.; Bryson, K.; Jones, D.T. The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinform. 2000, 16, 404–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–99. [Google Scholar]
  88. Felsenstein, J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1986, 39, 783–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Holmes, R.S. Comparative Studies of Vertebrate Platelet Glycoprotein 4 (CD36). Biomolecules 2012, 2, 389-414. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom2030389

AMA Style

Holmes RS. Comparative Studies of Vertebrate Platelet Glycoprotein 4 (CD36). Biomolecules. 2012; 2(3):389-414. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom2030389

Chicago/Turabian Style

Holmes, Roger S. 2012. "Comparative Studies of Vertebrate Platelet Glycoprotein 4 (CD36)" Biomolecules 2, no. 3: 389-414. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom2030389

APA Style

Holmes, R. S. (2012). Comparative Studies of Vertebrate Platelet Glycoprotein 4 (CD36). Biomolecules, 2(3), 389-414. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom2030389

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop