Next Article in Journal
Correction: Pennisi, R., et al. Hsp90: A New Player in DNA Repair? Biomolecules 2015, 5, 2589–2618
Previous Article in Journal
Inhibition of Bacterial RNase P RNA by Phenothiazine Derivatives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Functional Consequences of Differential O-glycosylation of MUC1, MUC4, and MUC16 (Downstream Effects on Signaling)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 6
Issue 4
10.3390/biom6040039
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Intra- and Extra-Cellular Events Related to Altered Glycosylation of MUC1 Promote Chronic Inflammation, Tumor Progression, Invasion, and Metastasis

by
Sandra Cascio
1,2,* and
Olivera J. Finn
1,*
1
Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA
2
Fondazione Ri.Med, via Bandiera 11, Palermo 90133, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2016, 6(4), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom6040039
Submission received: 8 July 2016 / Revised: 29 August 2016 / Accepted: 27 September 2016 / Published: 13 October 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer and Glycosylation)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Altered glycosylation of mucin 1 (MUC1) on tumor cells compared to normal epithelial cells was previously identified as an important antigenic modification recognized by the immune system in the process of tumor immunosurveillance. This tumor form of MUC1 is considered a viable target for cancer immunotherapy. The importance of altered MUC1 glycosylation extends also to its role as a promoter of chronic inflammatory conditions that lead to malignant transformation and cancer progression. We review here what is known about the role of specific cancer-associated glycans on MUC1 in protein-protein interactions and intracellular signaling in cancer cells and in their adhesion to each other and the tumor stroma. The tumor form of MUC1 also creates a different landscape of inflammatory cells in the tumor microenvironment by controlling the recruitment of inflammatory cells, establishing specific interactions with dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages, and facilitating tumor escape from the immune system. Through multiple types of short glycans simultaneously present in tumors, MUC1 acquires multiple oncogenic properties that control tumor development, progression, and metastasis at different steps of the process of carcinogenesis.

1. Introduction

Mucin 1 (MUC1) is a heterodimeric type I transmembrane glycoprotein expressed on the apical surface of most epithelia, including mammary gland, lung, pancreas, kidney, female reproductive tract, and stomach. Like other mucins, MUC1 normally provides a physical barrier that protects luminal surfaces of most glandular and ductal epithelial tissues. The extended O-glycan branches on MUC1 form a mucinous gel that maintains cell surfaces lubricated and hydrated, protecting from external changes of pH and limiting the access of bacteria, microbes, and degradative enzymes.
Various inflammatory premalignant and malignant conditions are associated with alterations in MUC1 expression and glycosylation that impact its cellular localization and function. Mucin glycosylation aberrations affect a variety of cellular activities, including growth, differentiation, and transformation. In addition, altered mucins affect adhesion, invasion, and immune surveillance.
Structurally, the full-length form of MUC1 consists of two subunits: a long N-terminal fragment (MUC1-N or subunit α), and a short C-terminal fragment (MUC1-C or subunit β) bound by non-covalent interactions (Figure 1). The MUC1-N contains the variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) region and the SEA (sea urchin sperm protein enterokinase and agrin) domain. The VNTR is composed of a 20-amino acid (aa) peptide sequence (PDTRPAPGSTAPPAHGVTSA) repeated nearly perfectly between 20–200 times per molecule, rich in proline, threonine, and serine residues (PTS domain). Proline residues provide rigidity and contribute to a highly extended protein structure, while threonines and serines serve as sites for extensive O-linked glycosylation. The VNTR is flanked by five proximal and two distal imperfect repeats (IR) which contain 4–9 serine/threonine residues each and are probable additional glycosylation sites [1]. The SEA domain contains the proteolytic cleavage site, GSVVV-containing module, that generates MUC1 subunits α and β soon after its translation as a single protein. Some amino acid sequences in the SEA are also important for the non-covalent association of protein subunits (Figure 1). MUC1 subunits remain associated through a hydrogen bond, but they can be released from the cell surface by additional proteolytic cleavage event. The cleavage and release of membrane-tethered mucins are implicated in the pathogenesis of many inflammatory conditions and cancers including pancreatic, ovarian, and breast carcinomas [2,3,4].
The ectodomain shedding event is a very common and highly regulated cellular process that modulates the functional properties of proteins [5] and regulates a number of biological processes such as signal transduction, adhesion, and proliferation [6]. The MUC1 heterodimer dissociation is induced by inflammatory stimuli such as interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), through activation of specific enzymes including the matrix metalloprotease ADAM (a disintegrin and metalloprotease)-17 and TNF-α containing enzyme (TACE) [7]. In addition, the cleavage sites in the extracellular region are often found in close proximity to O-glycosylation sites and hence glycosylation may affect proteolytic processing of the protein backbone [8,9,10].
The MUC1 C-terminal subunit contains a short extracellular domain (ECD) of 58 aa, a transmembrane domain (TM) of 28 aa that anchors MUC1-N to the cell surface, and a 72-aa cytoplasmic tail (CT). MUC1-CT is highly conserved and contains phosphorylated tyrosines. Through CT phosphorylation, MUC1 activates and mediates intracellular signaling by associating with various protein partners and modulating their function [11]. In tumor cells, increased tyrosine phosphorylation of MUC1-CT leads to interactions with new proteins, some of which are also aberrantly expressed in cancer. Specific examples are ErbB growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, β-catenin, and the estrogen receptor. Binding of MUC1 with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Erb2, and Erb3 activates signaling proteins including growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 Grb2, son of sevenless (SOS) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) [12]. Phospho-MUC1 has a lower affinity for glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3), which increases its binding to β-catenin, leading to the activation of the Wnt signaling pathway [13]. MUC1 stimulates the estrogen receptor-mediated transcription by binding directly to the estrogen receptor DNA-binding domain [14]. Moreover, MUC1-CT is also shown to modulate activity of the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway in breast cancer cells by interacting with and activating IkB kinase (IKK) family members and NF-κB p65 [15,16,17]. These new interactions of MUC1 with various proteins increase its internalization and enable nuclear localization, leading to altered signaling in cancer cells.

2. Aberrant Glycosylation of MUC1 Is Associated with Cancer

Altered glycosylation patterns are considered to be one of the hallmarks of cancer and represent one of the most common post-translational modifications that occur during neoplastic transformation. We have analyzed some of the mechanisms responsible for the effect of altered MUC1 glycosylation on the tumor microenvironment. N-glycans and O-glycans are two major groups of carbohydrates that contribute to many intra- and extra-cellular functions of MUC1. Both glycosylation types are regulated by complex mechanisms, including the expression and activity of glycosyltransferases.

2.1. O-glycosylation

Mucin type O-glycosylation is initiated by polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase (GALNT) family members that add N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) to either serines or threonines of PTS domains. The resulting O-linked structure is called Tn antigen. By the transfer of galactosamine (Gal) from UDP-Gal to GalNAc-α-1-R, the glycosyltransferase core 1 synthase, glycoprotein-N-acetylgalactosamine3-beta-galactosyltransferase, 1 (C1GalT1) (or T-synthase) generates the core 1 O-glycan, also named T antigen, which is the precursor of many extended O-glycans. In normal epithelial cells, the enzyme 2-β-1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase (C2GnT) elongates the core 1 O-glycan by the addition of GlcNAc (Figure 2). In cancer, the O-glycan chains attached to glycoproteins are often truncated and they commonly contain the Tn and T antigens, and their sialylated versions (STn and ST) [18,19]. The altered glycosylation occurring in tumor cells often results from aberrant expression of glycosyltransferases and their substrates that regulate their activity. Lack of C1GalT1 activity results in the exposure of Tn whereas the abundance of STn form is associated with aberrant overexpression of the α6-sialyltransferase ST6GalNAc1 that controls the sialylation of the first sugar GalNac of Core 1 (Figure 2). In breast cancer, the expression of RNA encoding ST6GalNAc1 correlates with sialyl-Tn expression [20]. Overexpression of the Tn form is also associated with somatic mutations in the core 1 β3-Gal-T-specific molecular chaperone, COSMC, gene that encodes a chaperone protein for the Core 1 synthase. The active form of C1GalT1 depends on the coexpression with COSMC, which prevents its aggregation and proteasomal degradation [21]. Depletion of the COSMC gene in vivo in mouse models causes loss of C1GalT1 activity and Tn antigen expression [22]. Epigenetic silencing of the COSMC gene, through promoter hypermethylation, occurs in prostate and other epithelial human cancers and correlates with overexpression of truncated O-glycans as well as C1GalT1 reduced expression [23]. Another enzyme often overexpressed in cancer is the α-2,3-sialyltransferase (ST3GalI) that adds sialic acid to core 1 glycans and is responsible for the abundance of the ST form (Figure 2). In breast carcinoma, ST3GalI expression is elevated when compared to normal or benign tissues and in ductal carcinoma the level of its messenger RNA (mRNA) is related to the grade of the tumor [24]. Overexpression of ST3GalI results in increased sialylation of MUC1 [25].
Underglycosylated forms of MUC1 are highly expressed in breast, colon, pancreas, and bladder tumors, among others, but not in normal tissues, and are often associated with epithelial to mesenchymal transition and invasiveness of cancer cells [26,27].
The role of STn has been investigated in breast cancer cells by inducing overexpression of α-N-acetylgalactosaminide-α-2,6-sialyltransferase 1 (ST6GalNAcI) enzyme. Clones of T47D breast cancer cell line overexpressing STn showed slower cell growth but increased cell migration. Moreover, adhesion of STn+ cells to several types of matrix proteins was decreased [28]. Transfections of ST6GalNAc1, performed in chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line, induced the production of MUC1 glycoform carrying STn epitope [20]. In MUC1 transgenic mice, sialyl-O-glycans have been shown to be associated with an enhanced growth of transplantable mammary carcinoma [29]. Overexpression of STn in human gastric cancer cell lines also accelerated their ability to form intraperitoneal metastases resulting in shorter survival of mice, credited mostly to MUC1 as the major STn carrier [30]. A recent evaluation of differential expression of mucin-associated glycans during colon carcinogenesis showed that MUC1-Tn and MUC1-STn are overexpressed in premalignant polyps, advanced adenoma, and adenocarcinoma, but not on the normal colon [31]. Both Tn and STn antigens are markers of poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas and mucinous carcinomas, and their increased occurrence is associated with highly proliferative tumors, metastasis, and poor clinical outcome [32,33]. Therefore, MUC1 STn and Tn forms are potential markers for early cancer diagnosis and prognosis and also targets for novel therapeutic strategies.
In addition to T, Tn, and their sialylated forms, structural studies on O-linked glycans on the MUC1 repeat peptide revealed that other types of glycans are carried on cancer cells. For example, on ZR-75 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines, MUC1 glycans include core 2-trisaccharides that terminate with 3-sialylated-galactose [34]. Mass spectrometric determination of MUC1-transfected prostate cancer cell line C4-2B4, revealed that the most prominent O-glycan on MUC1 was the non-sialylated and non-fucosylated core 2 oligosaccharide Galβ3/4GlcNAcβ6 [35]. However, small amounts of core 2 sialylated and fucosylated, as well as core 1 structures were also detected [35]. In gastric cancer tissues, a large variety of oligosaccharides have been detected, including both sialylated and fucosylated core 1 and 2 structures as well as large amount of oligosaccharides on MUC1 with α6-linked sialic acid, (NeuAcα6)GalNAc-ol and Galβ3(NeuAcα6)GalNAc-ol [36].
In ovarian, renal, prostate, and colon cancer, another type of shorter glycan structures associated with poor survival are MUC1 sialyl-Lewisx (SLex) and sialyl-Lewisa (SLea) [37,38,39,40,41]. SLe structures contain sialic acid and fucose and are derived by addition of β-1,4-galactose to form SLex and β-1,3-galactose to form SLea on core 2 structures. Metastatic cancer cells often have increased amounts of SLex and SLea when compared with primary tumors and expression of SLex on mucin O-glycans is highly associated with lymphatic and venous invasion [42,43,44]. SLe altered glycans serve as ligands for E- and P-selectins present on vascular endothelial cells. Therefore, cancer cells might use the SLex-selectin binding mechanism to promote their extravasation and metastasis [45,46]. This hypothesis has been recently confirmed by Zhang et al. who showed evidences that SLe structures increase cell adhesion and confer an anti-apoptotic property to cancer cells leading to chemoresitance in ovarian cancer [47].

2.2. N-glycosylation

While O-glycosylation has received extensive attention and mass spectrometry technology has enabled a detailed structural characterization of MUC1-related O-glycans, less is known about the N-glycosylation. O-linked glycans are attached to serines and threonines, while N-linked glycans are attached to the asparagine residue. MUC1 has five potential N-glycosylation sites: four are located in the C-terminal end of the VNTR, and the fifth is in the degenerate repeat flanking the VNTR [48,49].
Similar to O-glycosylation, N-glycosylation is important for the stability, folding, and secretion of glycoproteins. Membrane-derived and secreted-MUC1 showed a distinct N-glycosylation pattern [49], however the biological significance of this different glycan profile needs to be determined.

3. Aberrant Glycosylation of MUC1 Facilitates New Interactions with Cellular Proteins and Affects Intracellular Signaling in Cancer Cells

Carbohydrates covalently attached to proteins have been shown to play significant functional roles in proper protein folding, stability, and active biological conformation. Consequently, their alterations directly affect the properties of proteins, with important biological consequences for cellular differentiation, development, and progression of neoplasia and cancer immunosurveillance. Changes in carbohydrates also affect the physicochemical properties of proteins. Specifically, glycosylation modulates their thermostability as well as the overall charge. The addition of even a single monosaccharide to a protein can significantly impact the fluctuation in protein folded and unfolded states, enhancing its thermal and kinetic stability [50].
Changes in glycosylation have a significant impact on the physiological and pathophysiological activity of MUC1 as well. Loss or acquisition of glycans affects interactions of MUC1 with other cellular proteins. We recently demonstrated that cbl-interacting protein of 85 kDa (CIN85) is a MUC1-interacting protein implicated in migratory and metastatic activities of cancer cells. Notably, the interaction between MUC1 and CIN85 is dependent on the glycosylation state of the MUC1 extracellular domain. Overexpression of STn-MUC1 forms, induced in vitro by transfection of ST6GalNAc1, significantly enhanced the binding of MUC1 and CIN85 in breast cancer cells. Similar results were obtained after knocking-down the expression of C1GalT1, responsible for the conversion of Tn antigen to T antigen, which enhanced MUC1-CIN85 interaction [51]. The role of the extracellular domain of MUC1, and in particular its aberrant glycosylation, in facilitating new protein-protein interaction and controlling intracellular signaling was confirmed by another of our studies revealing the ability of the tumor form of MUC1 to increase the expression levels of NF-κB family members, such as phospho-IκB kinase (IKK)-β and phospho-inhibitor od kappa B (IκB)-α. Upon stimulation with TNF-α, the hypoglycosylated form of MUC1 accumulates in the cytosol in association with the activated form of p65 (phospho-65) and then translocates to the nucleus where it controls transcription of several pro-inflammatory cytokines (Figure 3) [17].
Another example of a key role of MUC1 glycosylation in protein-protein interactions is the interaction between galectin-3 and MUC1. Galectin-3 is a galactoside-binding protein expressed intra-and extra-cellularly as well as found free in circulation. Many studies have reported that the binding of galectin-3 with MUC1 triggers MUC1-dependent intracellular signaling in cancer cells and facilitates adhesion of cancer cells to each other and to endothelial cells [52]. Whereas there is an agreement on the function of this complex, opposing opinions have been reported about the binding domain of MUC1 to galectin-3. Ramasamy et al. indicated that galectin-3 binds the MUC1-C terminal subunit at the glycosylated Asn-36 site [53]. On the other hand, Yu et al. indicated that only the cancer-associated MUC1 is the natural ligand of galectin-3, this interaction being mediated through the T-antigen [54]. Yet another study showed that Galectin-3 binds MUC1-N terminal domain and this association triggers MUC1-mediated signaling, leading to the recruitment of β-catenin to MUC1-C [55].
Other evidence exists confirming the role of hypoglycosylated MUC1 in aberrant signaling in cancer cells. In breast cancer, overexpression of N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase (GALNT6) contributes to increased proliferation possibly through stabilization of MUC1 protein. GALNT6-MUC1 pathway induces morphologic changes in cells accompanied by increased expression of cell adhesion molecules β-catenin and E-cadherin [56]. Another example is C1GalT1, an enzyme overexpressed in breast carcinoma that correlates with higher histological grade and advanced tumor stage. C1GalT1 also promotes breast cancer cell growth, migration, and invasion. It has been suggested that C1GalT1 enhances the malignant phenotype by inducing O-glycosylation changes on MUC1 and modulating the MUC1/β-catenin signaling pathway [57]. In inflammatory lung conditions induced by cigarette smoke, aberrant glycosylation of MUC1 promoted MUC1/p120 complex formation, as well as E-cadherin degradation and disassembly of adherence junctions, facilitating epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) [58].
Changes in glycosylation impact not only the conformation of folded MUC1, its protein stability, and interaction with other proteins, but also its subcellular localization. Shorter O-glycans can slow down the delivery of MUC1 to the cell surface or increase MUC1 internalization from the surface to the cytosol, potentiating its oncogenic function [1,59].

4. MUC1 Glycosylation in Cancer Progression and Metastasis

Increased levels of MUC1 expression and its altered glycosylation have been associated with cancer progression and metastasis that correlate with poor prognosis and high mortality [3,60,61,62] Metastasis is a multi-step process during which cancer cells leave the primary tumor site, infiltrate into the adjacent tissue by degrading the extracellular matrix, enter into blood stream wherein they are recognized as circulating tumor cells, and extravasate and colonize a secondary site.
The involvement of N- and/or O-linked glycans in cancer metastasis has been explored in vitro by transfections of cells with plasmids expressing specific glycosyltranferases, by addition of glycosylation sites, or by using drugs that affect oligosaccharide chain elongation. Results indicated an important role of aberrant glycosylation of MUC1 both at an early as well as the late stage of the metastasis cascade.
We recently demonstrated the important role of MUC1 in the early stage of metastasis. By associating with CIN85, an adaptor protein previously reported to be involved in cell migration [63], MUC1 confers an invasive property to cancer cells. Importantly, overexpression of the hypoglycosylated STn- and ST-MUC1 forms, induced by transfection with glycosyltransferases ST6GalNAc1 and ST3Gal1 encoding plasmids, enhanced its interaction with CIN85 and increased the migratory and invasive activities of cancer cells [51]. In addition, overexpression of ST6GalNAc1 that promotes STn type glycans on MUC1, increased intraperitoneal metastasis of human gastric cancer cells [30] and led to increased growth of human breast cancer cells in immunodeficient mice [64].
Recently, computational modeling revealed that bulky glycoproteins modulate transmembrane receptor spatial organization and function. In particular, MUC1 expression facilitates integrin clustering and focal adhesion assembly. By promoting focal adhesion assembly, MUC1 promotes also tumor cell growth and facilitates metastasis [65]. A critical step preceding metastasis is adhesion of circulating tumor cells to the vascular endothelium. Tumor-specific forms of MUC1 promote tumor cell adhesion to the endothelium through interactions with E-selectin and the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), two receptors expressed on the surface of endothelial and peritumoral stromal cells. The interaction between MUC1 and ICAM-1 facilitates cell-cell adhesion and trans-endothelial migration [66,67]. Moreover, upon interaction with ICAM-1, MUC1 initiates cytoskeletal rearrangement and shows increased pro-migratory activity [68]. As mentioned above, the extracellular Galectin-3 acts as an adhesion protein in cell-cell interactions and is involved in cancer progression and metastasis. Galectin-3 is highly expressed on circulating breast, colon, and lung cancer cells [69]. Patients with metastasis have higher concentration of circulating galectin-3 than patients with localized tumors, which binds the tumor specific carbohydrate T-antigen to promote metastasis [70].
Numerous other findings demonstrate the key role of abnormal MUC1 and related glycosyltransferases in tumor progression and metastasis. Recently, the polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 3 (GALNT3) gene promoter was found to be significantly hypomethylated in epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC) compared to normal tissue. GALNT3 is overexpressed exclusively in high-grade serous ovarian tumors compared to tumors with low-malignant potential and normal tissues. Functional analyses revealed the oncogenic activity of GALNT3 in EOC, including its role in cell proliferation and cell migration and invasion. Knockdown of GALNT3 induced reduction of MUC1 expression in EOC cells although transcription of MUC1 was unchanged. Thus, GALNT3 may influence the posttranslational modification and stabilization of MUC1 and other glycosylated proteins in EOC cells [71]. In breast cancer cells, upregulation of GALNT6, a glycosyltrasferase that transfers a GalNAc residue to MUC1 protein, stabilizes MUC1 and plays a critical role in the proliferation and cytoskeletal regulation of breast cancer cells [56].

5. MUC1 Hypoglycosylation in Inflammation

In addition to cancer, changes in glycosylation are associated with both acute and chronic inflammation. The key molecules involved in adaptive and innate immunity are glycoproteins such as the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II. In addition, during maturation, the glycan chains of antigen receptors on B and T cells are modified with subsequent alteration of their cell surface molecular interactions that regulate receptor trafficking, signal transduction, and receptor internalization. Furthermore, alterations of immunoglobulin G (IgG) glycosylation have been linked with autoimmune diseases such as rheumathoid arthritis, Lambert-Eaton Syndrome, and Syogren’s Syndrome. In the review of Maverakis et al., it was postulated that different autoimmune diseases have a specific glycan profile characterized by the site-specific relative abundance of glycan structures expressed on immune cells and extracellular proteins [72].
The origin of altered glycosylation in cancer has been investigated by Haab’s group [73] Specifically, to test the hypothesis that pro-inflammatory stimuli affect mucin glycosylation, they stimulated six pancreatic cancer cell lines with IFN-γ, interleukin-1 (IL-1), and TNF-α and evaluated alterations in glycosylation and expression. Expression levels of MUC1, mucin 5 (MUC5), and mucin 16 (MUC16) increased with MUC1 showing the greatest change. They also calculated the glycans/protein ratio and their results suggested that glycans on mucins were remodeled in response to pro-inflammatory stimuli [73]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IFN-γ also enhanced the expression of MUC1 in breast cancer cells through NF-κB and signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) activation, respectively [74]. It is also known that persistent activation of STAT3 signaling following epidermal growth factor (EGF) or IL-6 stimulation, results in upregulation of MUC1 (and other mucins) via direct binding of STAT3 to specific elements on the MUC1 promoter [75,76]. Exposure to IFN-γ and TNF-α increased MUC1 expression in ovarian cell lines that showed either high (cell lines OAW42 and GG) or low (cell lines JAM and PE01) basal expression of MUC1 [77]. Similarly, ocular epithelial cell lines increase expression of MUC1 after exposure to inflammatory mediators present in tears [78]. In oral epithelial cells, MUC1 expression is modulated by inflammatory mediators including IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ [79,80,81].
These findings support our ongoing experiments revealing overexpression of hypoglycosylated MUC1 in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells after TNF-α stimulation. Previously, we published that TNF-α treatment induced the association between hypoglycosylated form of MUC1 and NF-kB p65, the translocation of MUC1/p65 to the nucleus and further promotion of transcription and expression of inflammatory cytokines [17]. This mechanism establishes an autocrine and paracrine positive feedback loop that amplifies and maintains high levels of inflammatory cytokines in epithelial cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment (Figure 3). As TNF-α stimulation is responsible for increasing expression of β-galactoside-α-2,3-sialyltransferase 4 (ST3GalIV) and human alpha (1,3)-fucosyltransferase IV (FUTIV) through activation of NF-κB pathway [82], it is possible that pro-inflammatory cytokines influence mucin glycosylation through direct modulation of glycosyltransferase expression. However, the exact mechanism that links the inflammatory stimuli with altered glycans remains to be further explored.
The link between aberrant pattern of MUC1 glycosylation and inflammation-related cancer has been extensively demonstrated in our laboratory also in in vivo models. We have used mice transgenic for the human MUC1 gene (MUC1.Tg) that express the full-length form of MUC1 in the same spatial and tissue distribution as the human protein [83]. The mouse MUC1 shares 87% homology in the cytoplasmic domain and only 34% homology in the extracellular domain of human MUC1. Thus, human MUC1.Tg mice represent a very good model to investigate the role of the human MUC1 extracellular domain and its altered glycosylation in inflammation and cancer development.
It is well accepted that chronic inflammation increases the risk of cancer development and further enhances cancer progression. One example of inflammation-related cancer is colitis-associated cancer (CAC). A commonly used mouse model of CAC is based on administration of the combination of azoxymethane (AOM), a potent carcinogen, and the inflammatory agent dextran sulfate sodium (DSS). We found that after AOM/DSS treatment, the expression level of hypoglycosylated MUC1 was significantly increased in colon tissues. Furthermore, the presence of human MUC1 aggravated colitis symptoms, causing greater loss of body weight and higher mortality rate, significantly increasing the incidence of tumors [84,85].
IL-10 knockout mouse is another well-established mouse model of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) wherein inflamed colon is characterized by inflammatory cell infiltration, crypt abscess formation, and epithelial hyperplasia. However, in only less than 20% of these mice, IBD progresses to adenocarcinoma. We demonstrated that introduction of human MUC1 into the IL-10 knockout mouse accelerated the occurrence of IBD, induced a more severe grade of inflammation, and promoted cancer development and progression in over 80% of the mice. Moreover, a drastic difference in the intensity of the cellular infiltrate between MUC1/IL-10 mice and IL-10 mice was detected. Importantly, hypoglycosylated form of MUC1 was detected at low levels in tissue sections with little inflammation whereas it was significantly increased in inflamed tissue, correlating with the inflammation score [86].

6. Abnormal MUC1 in the Tumor Microenvironment

The network of tumor cells and non-malignant cells creates the tumor microenvironment (TME). Non-malignant components of the TME include inflammatory cells, fibroblasts, and tumor vasculature and lymphatics. The composition of TME depends on the type of cancer, patient’s age, and other factors that still need to be characterized. Indeed, most successful anti-cancer treatments target not only the malignant cells, but also various components in the TME that promote cancer progression and inhibit anti-cancer immunity.
In our mouse models of IBD and CAC described above [85,86], profound differences were detected in MUC1+ mice in pro-inflammatory cell populations at the sites of inflammation as well as in the tumor microenvironment. Specifically, in the presence of human MUC1, extensive accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) dominates the spleen while they are absent in wild-type mice. The exact mechanism by which the tumor form of MUC1 modifies the tumor microenvironment is still unknown. Recent studies indicated that the interactions between altered glycans and lectins on immune cells are involved in the modification of the tumor microenvironment. For example, siglecs, members of the lectin family, are expressed on immune cells and have immunosuppressive properties. They recognize sialylated glycans [87,88] expressed on tumor cells. Co-culture of macrophages and lung cancer cells revealed a strong interaction between siglec-15, normally present on the surface of tumor associate macrophages (TAMs), and STn-glycans of cancer cells leading to production of TGF-β increased in Siglec15+ cells [89].
In breast cancer, MUC1 interacts with sialoadhesin (Sn), a receptor present on the majority of infiltrating macrophages that specifically binds the sialylated form of MUC1 [90]. Macrophages that play a key role in the adaptive and innate immune responses have been classified in two subpopulations: the classically activated macrophages (Type I), and the alternatively activated macrophages (Type II). Type 1 macrophages produce pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), whereas type 2 macrophages express anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and arginase-1. In our mouse model of CAC, we found the presence of human MUC1 induced type 1 macrophages. This can explain the inflammatory role of MUC1 and its activity in tumor promotion and progression.
A different landscape of infiltrating inflammatory cells in the presence of MUC1 can also be explained by the fact that hypoglycosylated MUC1 is chemotactic to inflammatory cells [91,92,93]. The short glycans on the tumor MUC1 directly bind inflammatory cells leading to tumor cell detachment from the primary tumor site and migration to a secondary site. Tumor microenvironment also influences the recruitment and differentiation of dendritic cells (DC) and their ability to prime T cells. Inability of DC to present tumor antigens to T cells is one of the mechanisms of tumor escape from immune surveillance. Hypoglycosylated MUC1 recruits immature DC and induces their aberrant maturation. In in vitro experiments, co-cultures of DC precursors with MUC1+ tumor cells inhibited their differentiation and function. In addition, DCs tend to adhere more to MUC1-STn+ cancer cells and this contact inhibits DC maturation, inducing them to produce IL-10 and reducing their ability to trigger the protective T helper 1 (Th1) response [91,94].
Aberrant glycosylation of MUC1 also inhibits its processing as a tumor antigen by DC and presentation to T cells. This is compounded by inefficient transport of endocytosed MUC1 from early endosomes to later endosomal compartments in DC for degradation into peptides or glycopeptides that bind to class II MHC. We have previously proposed that the exceptional avidity of binding between the tandemly repeated carbohydrates of MUC1 and mannose receptors on DC does not allow their dissociation after cellular internalization and thereby MUC1 degradation [95]. It was also observed that STn+ cancer cells inhibited generation of Th1 T cells further, limiting the ability of the anti-tumor T cell response [96]. This all affects development of stronger anti-MUC1 immunity that could otherwise target the abnormal MUC1 as an antigen on tumor cells for efficient cancer immunosurveillance.
Natural killer (NK) cells play a central role in tumor immunosurveillance [97]. However, tumor cells are capable of avoiding recognition and destruction by innate immune cells. Several studies have reported that increased expression of sialylated glycans on the surface of tumor cells promotes immuno-evasion and protects cancer cells from NK cell lysis. The interaction of NK cells with tumor sialoglycans is mediated by inhibitory receptors sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin-(siglec)-7 and 9. After the engagement of siglecs with the sialoglycans on tumor cells, NK cell function is attenuated. By using synthetic glypolymers that mimic cell-associated glycans, Hudeck et al. showed that remodeling of the sialylation status of cancer cells affected the response of NK cells via siglec-7. Specifically, increased glycan sialylation inhibited NK cell activation [98]. These data are supported by another report that showed that treatment of tumor cells with neuraminidase that removes sialic acid, restores their sensitivity to NK cell cytotoxicity and promotes their cytokine secretion [99].

7. Conclusions

Overexpression and aberrant glycosylation of MUC1 on tumor cells influences many critical steps in tumor initiation, progression, and metastasis as well as in tumor immunosurveillance. We found that this hypoglycosylated tumor form of MUC1 is also overexpressed during chronic inflammation and in premalignant lesions that progress to tumors. Truncated sugars on MUC1, such as T, Tn, and their sialylated forms, are associated with more advanced tumor stages and poor prognosis. Shorter O-glycans confer oncogenic properties to MUC1 leading to aberrant intracellular signaling that results in increased transcription of several target genes including those encoding pro-inflammatory cytokines. Secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines enhances the recruitment of inflammatory cells into the tumor site. Inflammatory cells, including macrophages and DC, are a further source of inflammatory cytokines, which in turn promote tumor progression and metastasis (Figure 2). Therefore, even if MUC1 is not a direct initiator of neoplastic transformation, it plays a key role in aggravating inflammatory conditions that create a pro-tumor microenvironment, accelerating tumor growth and metastasis. In addition, hypoglycosylated MUC1 can inhibit its own processing by DC as a tumor antigen and presentation to T cells, thereby preventing anti-tumor immune responses. Thus, targeting hypoglycosylated MUC1 with various drugs or biologics that can modulate or inhibit some of the many functions we described above may lead to inhibition of tumor growth and promotion of anti-tumor immune responses, including anti-MUC1 immunity. Vaccines targeting the hypoglycosylated MUC1 are one modality being developed by us and others in an effort to induce antibodies and T cells that can eliminate inflammation and/or tumor initiating cells that express this form of MUC1, thereby preventing further inflammation and promoting anti-tumor activity of many effector cells in the microenvironment.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Fondazione Ri.Med (S.C.) and the National Institute of Health Grant CA168392-05 (O.J.F.).

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kinlough, C.L.; Poland, P.A.; Gendler, S.J.; Mattila, P.E.; Mo, D.; Weisz, O.A.; Hughey, R.P. Core-glycosylated mucin-like repeats from MUC1 are an apical targeting signal. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 39072–39081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cadron, I.; Van Gorp, T.; Mihalyi, A.; Luyten, C.; Drijkoningen, K.; Amant, F.; Leunen, K.; Vergote, I. The impact of enzastaurin (LY317615.HCL) on CA125 biosynthesis and shedding in ovarian cancer cells. Gynecol. Oncol. 2010, 118, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hollingsworth, M.A.; Swanson, B.J. Mucins in cancer: Protection and control of the cell surface. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2004, 4, 45–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mukhopadhyay, P.; Chakraborty, S.; Ponnusamy, M.P.; Lakshmanan, I.; Jain, M.; Batra, S.K. Mucins in the pathogenesis of breast cancer: Implications in diagnosis, prognosis and therapy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1815, 224–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Schlondorff, J.; Blobel, C.P. Metalloprotease-disintegrins: Modular proteins capable of promoting cell-cell interactions and triggering signals by protein-ectodomain shedding. J. Cell Sci. 1999, 112, 3603–3617. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Blobel, C.P. Adams: Key components in EGFR signalling and development. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Thathiah, A.; Blobel, C.P.; Carson, D.D. Tumor necrosis factor-α converting enzyme/ADAM 17 mediates MUC1 shedding. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 3386–3394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Goth, C.K.; Halim, A.; Khetarpal, S.A.; Rader, D.J.; Clausen, H.; Schjoldager, K.T. A systematic study of modulation of ADAM-mediated ectodomain shedding by site-specific O-glycosylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 14623–14628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Thathiah, A.; Brayman, M.; Dharmaraj, N.; Julian, J.J.; Lagow, E.L.; Carson, D.D. Tumor necrosis factor α stimulates MUC1 synthesis and ectodomain release in a human uterine epithelial cell line. Endocrinology 2004, 145, 4192–4203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Varki, A. Biological roles of oligosaccharides: All of the theories are correct. Glycobiology 1993, 3, 97–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Nath, S.; Mukherjee, P. MUC1: A multifaceted oncoprotein with a key role in cancer progression. Trends Mol. Med. 2014, 20, 332–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pandey, P.; Kharbanda, S.; Kufe, D. Association of the DF3/MUC1 breast cancer antigen with GRB2 and the SOS/RAS exchange protein. Cancer Res. 1995, 55, 4000–4003. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Huang, L.; Chen, D.; Liu, D.; Yin, L.; Kharbanda, S.; Kufe, D. MUC1 oncoprotein blocks glycogen synthase kinase 3β-mediated phosphorylation and degradation of β-catenin. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 10413–10422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wei, X.; Xu, H.; Kufe, D. MUC1 oncoprotein stabilizes and activates estrogen receptor α. Mol. Cell 2006, 21, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ahmad, R.; Raina, D.; Joshi, M.D.; Kawano, T.; Ren, J.; Kharbanda, S.; Kufe, D. MUC1-C oncoprotein functions as a direct activator of the nuclear factor-κB p65 transcription factor. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 7013–7021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ahmad, R.; Raina, D.; Trivedi, V.; Ren, J.; Rajabi, H.; Kharbanda, S.; Kufe, D. MUC1 oncoprotein activates the IκB kinase β complex and constitutive NF-κB signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9, 1419–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Cascio, S.; Zhang, L.; Finn, O.J. MUC1 protein expression in tumor cells regulates transcription of proinflammatory cytokines by forming a complex with nuclear factor-κB p65 and binding to cytokine promoters: Importance of extracellular domain. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 42248–42256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Brockhausen, I. Biosynthesis and functions of O-glycans and regulation of mucin antigen expression in cancer. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1997, 25, 871–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Brockhausen, I.; Schachter, H.; Stanley, P. O-GalNAc glycans. In Essentials of Glycobiology, 2nd ed.; Varki, A., Cummings, R.D., Esko, J.D., Freeze, H.H., Stanley, P., Bertozzi, C.R., Hart, G.W., Etzler, M.E., Eds.; Cold Spring Harbor: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sewell, R.; Backstrom, M.; Dalziel, M.; Gschmeissner, S.; Karlsson, H.; Noll, T.; Gatgens, J.; Clausen, H.; Hansson, G.C.; Burchell, J.; et al. The ST6GALNAc-I sialyltransferase localizes throughout the Golgi and is responsible for the synthesis of the tumor-associated sialyl-Tn O-glycan in human breast cancer. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 3586–3594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ju, T.; Cummings, R.D. A unique molecular chaperone Cosmc required for activity of the mammalian core 1 β3-galactosyltransferase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 16613–16618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, Y.; Ju, T.; Ding, X.; Xia, B.; Wang, W.; Xia, L.; He, M.; Cummings, R.D. Cosmc is an essential chaperone for correct protein O-glycosylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 9228–9233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Radhakrishnan, P.; Dabelsteen, S.; Madsen, F.B.; Francavilla, C.; Kopp, K.L.; Steentoft, C.; Vakhrushev, S.Y.; Olsen, J.V.; Hansen, L.; Bennett, E.P.; et al. Immature truncated O-glycophenotype of cancer directly induces oncogenic features. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E4066–E4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Burchell, J.; Poulsom, R.; Hanby, A.; Whitehouse, C.; Cooper, L.; Clausen, H.; Miles, D.; Taylor-Papadimitriou, J. An α2,3 sialyltransferase (ST3Gal I) is elevated in primary breast carcinomas. Glycobiology 1999, 9, 1307–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Whitehouse, C.; Burchell, J.; Gschmeissner, S.; Brockhausen, I.; Lloyd, K.O.; Taylor-Papadimitriou, J. A transfected sialyltransferase that is elevated in breast cancer and localizes to the medial/trans-Golgi apparatus inhibits the development of core-2-based O-glycans. J. Cell Biol. 1997, 137, 1229–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pinho, S.S.; Reis, C.A. Glycosylation in cancer: Mechanisms and clinical implications. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2015, 15, 540–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Roy, L.D.; Sahraei, M.; Subramani, D.B.; Besmer, D.; Nath, S.; Tinder, T.L.; Bajaj, E.; Shanmugam, K.; Lee, Y.Y.; Hwang, S.I.; et al. MUC1 enhances invasiveness of pancreatic cancer cells by inducing epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Oncogene 2011, 30, 1449–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Julien, S.; Lagadec, C.; Krzewinski-Recchi, M.A.; Courtand, G.; Le Bourhis, X.; Delannoy, P. Stable expression of sialyl-Tn antigen in T47-D cells induces a decrease of cell adhesion and an increase of cell migration. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2005, 90, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Mungul, A.; Cooper, L.; Brockhausen, I.; Ryder, K.; Mandel, U.; Clausen, H.; Rughetti, A.; Miles, D.W.; Taylor-Papadimitriou, J.; Burchell, J.M. Sialylated core 1 based O-linked glycans enhance the growth rate of mammary carcinoma cells in MUC1 transgenic mice. Int. J. Oncol. 2004, 25, 937–943. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Ozaki, H.; Matsuzaki, H.; Ando, H.; Kaji, H.; Nakanishi, H.; Ikehara, Y.; Narimatsu, H. Enhancement of metastatic ability by ectopic expression of ST6GalNAcI on a gastric cancer cell line in a mouse model. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2012, 29, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Krishn, S.R.; Kaur, S.; Smith, L.M.; Johansson, S.L.; Jain, M.; Patel, A.; Gautam, S.K.; Hollingsworth, M.A.; Mandel, U.; Clausen, H.; et al. Mucins and associated glycan signatures in colon adenoma-carcinoma sequence: Prospective pathological implication(s) for early diagnosis of colon cancer. Cancer Lett. 2016, 374, 304–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Itzkowitz, S.H.; Bloom, E.J.; Kokal, W.A.; Modin, G.; Hakomori, S.; Kim, Y.S. Sialosyl-Tn. A novel mucin antigen associated with prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. Cancer 1990, 66, 1960–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ogata, S.; Koganty, R.; Reddish, M.; Longenecker, B.M.; Chen, A.; Perez, C.; Itzkowitz, S.H. Different modes of sialyl-Tn expression during malignant transformation of human colonic mucosa. Glycoconj. J. 1998, 15, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Muller, S.; Hanisch, F.G. Recombinant MUC1 probe authentically reflects cell-specific O-glycosylation profiles of endogenous breast cancer mucin. High density and prevalent core 2-based glycosylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 26103–26112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Premaratne, P.; Welen, K.; Damber, J.E.; Hansson, G.C.; Backstrom, M. O-glycosylation of MUC1 mucin in prostate cancer and the effects of its expression on tumor growth in a prostate cancer xenograft model. Tumour Biol. 2011, 32, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Backstrom, M.; Thomsson, K.A.; Karlsson, H.; Hansson, G.C. Sensitive liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry allows for the analysis of the O-glycosylation of immunoprecipitated proteins from cells or tissues: Application to MUC1 glycosylation in cancer. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 538–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Borzym-Kluczyk, M.; Radziejewska, I.; Cechowska-Pasko, M. Increased expression of MUC1 and sialyl Lewis antigens in different areas of clear renal cell carcinoma. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2015, 19, 732–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chen, Z.; Gulzar, Z.G.; St Hill, C.A.; Walcheck, B.; Brooks, J.D. Increased expression of GCNT1 is associated with altered O-glycosylation of PSA, PAP, and MUC1 in human prostate cancers. Prostate 2014, 74, 1059–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Dohi, D.F.; Sutton, R.C.; Frazier, M.L.; Nakamori, S.; McIsaac, A.M.; Irimura, T. Regulation of sialomucin production in colon carcinoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 10133–10138. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Nakamori, S.; Kameyama, M.; Imaoka, S.; Furukawa, H.; Ishikawa, O.; Sasaki, Y.; Kabuto, T.; Iwanaga, T.; Matsushita, Y.; Irimura, T. Increased expression of sialyl Lewisx antigen correlates with poor survival in patients with colorectal carcinoma: Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study. Cancer Res. 1993, 53, 3632–3637. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Ricardo, S.; Marcos-Silva, L.; Valente, C.; Coelho, R.; Gomes, R.; David, L. Mucins MUC16 and MUC1 are major carriers of SLea and SLex in borderline and malignant serous ovarian tumors. Virchows Arch. 2016, 468, 715–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hanski, C.; Klussmann, E.; Wang, J.; Bohm, C.; Ogorek, D.; Hanski, M.L.; Kruger-Krasagakes, S.; Eberle, J.; Schmitt-Graff, A.; Riecken, E.O. Fucosyltransferase III and sialyl-Lex expression correlate in cultured colon carcinoma cells but not in colon carcinoma tissue. Glycoconj. J. 1996, 13, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ito, H.; Hiraiwa, N.; Sawada-Kasugai, M.; Akamatsu, S.; Tachikawa, T.; Kasai, Y.; Akiyama, S.; Ito, K.; Takagi, H.; Kannagi, R. Altered mRNA expression of specific molecular species of fucosyl- and sialyl-transferases in human colorectal cancer tissues. Int. J. Cancer 1997, 71, 556–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Petretti, T.; Kemmner, W.; Schulze, B.; Schlag, P.M. Altered mRNA expression of glycosyltransferases in human colorectal carcinomas and liver metastases. Gut 2000, 46, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hauselmann, I.; Borsig, L. Altered tumor-cell glycosylation promotes metastasis. Front. Oncol. 2014, 4, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Kojima, N.; Handa, K.; Newman, W.; Hakomori, S. Inhibition of selectin-dependent tumor cell adhesion to endothelial cells and platelets by blocking O-glycosylation of these cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1992, 182, 1288–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, D.; Gao, J.; Zhu, L.; Hu, Z.; Hou, R.; Liu, S.; Tan, M.; Liu, J.; Lin, B. Chemoresistance is associated with MUC1 and Lewis y antigen expression in ovarian epithelial cancers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 11024–11033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lan, M.S.; Batra, S.K.; Qi, W.N.; Metzgar, R.S.; Hollingsworth, M.A. Cloning and sequencing of a human pancreatic tumor mucin cDNA. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 15294–15299. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Parry, S.; Hanisch, F.G.; Leir, S.H.; Sutton-Smith, M.; Morris, H.R.; Dell, A.; Harris, A. N-glycosylation of the MUC1 mucin in epithelial cells and secretions. Glycobiology 2006, 16, 623–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Shental-Bechor, D.; Levy, Y. Effect of glycosylation on protein folding: A close look at thermodynamic stabilization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 8256–8261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Cascio, S.; Farkas, A.M.; Hughey, R.P.; Finn, O.J. Altered glycosylation of MUC1 influences its association with CIN85: The role of this novel complex in cancer cell invasion and migration. Oncotarget 2013, 4, 1686–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Mori, Y.; Akita, K.; Yashiro, M.; Sawada, T.; Hirakawa, K.; Murata, T.; Nakada, H. Binding of galectin-3, a β-galactoside-binding lectin, to MUC1 protein enhances phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) and Akt, promoting tumor cell malignancy. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 26125–26140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ramasamy, S.; Duraisamy, S.; Barbashov, S.; Kawano, T.; Kharbanda, S.; Kufe, D. The MUC1 and galectin-3 oncoproteins function in a microRNA-dependent regulatory loop. Mol. Cell 2007, 27, 992–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yu, L.G.; Andrews, N.; Zhao, Q.; McKean, D.; Williams, J.F.; Connor, L.J.; Gerasimenko, O.V.; Hilkens, J.; Hirabayashi, J.; Kasai, K.; et al. Galectin-3 interaction with Thomsen-Friedenreich disaccharide on cancer-associated MUC1 causes increased cancer cell endothelial adhesion. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 773–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Tanida, S.; Mori, Y.; Ishida, A.; Akita, K.; Nakada, H. Galectin-3 binds to MUC1-N-terminal domain and triggers recruitment of β-catenin in MUC1-expressing mouse 3T3 cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1840, 1790–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Park, J.H.; Nishidate, T.; Kijima, K.; Ohashi, T.; Takegawa, K.; Fujikane, T.; Hirata, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Katagiri, T. Critical roles of mucin 1 glycosylation by transactivated polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 6 in mammary carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 2759–2769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Chou, C.H.; Huang, M.J.; Chen, C.H.; Shyu, M.K.; Huang, J.; Hung, J.S.; Huang, C.S.; Huang, M.C. Up-regulation of C1GAlT1 promotes breast cancer cell growth through MUC1-C signaling pathway. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 6123–6135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Zhang, L.; Gallup, M.; Zlock, L.; Chen, Y.T.; Finkbeiner, W.E.; McNamara, N.A. Pivotal role of MUC1 glycosylation by cigarette smoke in modulating disruption of airway adherens junctions in vitro. J. Pathol. 2014, 234, 60–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Altschuler, Y.; Kinlough, C.L.; Poland, P.A.; Bruns, J.B.; Apodaca, G.; Weisz, O.A.; Hughey, R.P. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis of MUC1 is modulated by its glycosylation state. Mol. Biol. Cell 2000, 11, 819–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Duncan, T.J.; Watson, N.F.; Al-Attar, A.H.; Scholefield, J.H.; Durrant, L.G. The role of MUC1 and MUC3 in the biology and prognosis of colorectal cancer. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2007, 5, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Inata, J.; Hattori, N.; Yokoyama, A.; Ohshimo, S.; Doi, M.; Ishikawa, N.; Hamada, H.; Kohno, N. Circulating KL-6/MUC1 mucin carrying sialyl Lewisa oligosaccharide is an independent prognostic factor in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 2007, 120, 2643–2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Suzuki, H.; Shoda, J.; Kawamoto, T.; Shinozaki, E.; Miyahara, N.; Hotta, S.; Iizuka, Y.; Nakahara, A.; Tanaka, N.; Yanaka, A.; et al. Expression of MUC1 recognized by monoclonal antibody MY.1E12 is a useful biomarker for tumor aggressiveness of advanced colon carcinoma. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2004, 21, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Havrylov, S.; Redowicz, M.J.; Buchman, V.L. Emerging roles of RUK/CIN85 in vesicle-mediated transport, adhesion, migration and malignancy. Traffic 2010, 11, 721–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Julien, S.; Adriaenssens, E.; Ottenberg, K.; Furlan, A.; Courtand, G.; Vercoutter-Edouart, A.S.; Hanisch, F.G.; Delannoy, P.; Le Bourhis, X. ST6GalNAc I expression in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells greatly modifies their O-glycosylation pattern and enhances their tumourigenicity. Glycobiology 2006, 16, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Paszek, M.J.; DuFort, C.C.; Rossier, O.; Bainer, R.; Mouw, J.K.; Godula, K.; Hudak, J.E.; Lakins, J.N.; Wijekoon, A.C.; Cassereau, L.; et al. The cancer glycocalyx mechanically primes integrin-mediated growth and survival. Nature 2014, 511, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Geng, Y.; Yeh, K.; Takatani, T.; King, M.R. Three to tango: MUC1 as a ligand for both E-selectin and ICAM-1 in the breast cancer metastatic cascade. Front. Oncol. 2012, 2, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Rahn, J.J.; Chow, J.W.; Horne, G.J.; Mah, B.K.; Emerman, J.T.; Hoffman, P.; Hugh, J.C. MUC1 mediates transendothelial migration in vitro by ligating endothelial cell ICAM-1. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2005, 22, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Shen, Q.; Rahn, J.J.; Zhang, J.; Gunasekera, N.; Sun, X.; Shaw, A.R.; Hendzel, M.J.; Hoffman, P.; Bernier, A.; Hugh, J.C. MUC1 initiates SRC-CRKL-RAC1/CDC42-mediated actin cytoskeletal protrusive motility after ligating intercellular adhesion molecule-1. Mol. Cancer Res. 2008, 6, 555–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Iurisci, I.; Tinari, N.; Natoli, C.; Angelucci, D.; Cianchetti, E.; Iacobelli, S. Concentrations of galectin-3 in the sera of normal controls and cancer patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000, 6, 1389–1393. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  70. Zhao, Q.; Guo, X.; Nash, G.B.; Stone, P.C.; Hilkens, J.; Rhodes, J.M.; Yu, L.G. Circulating galectin-3 promotes metastasis by modifying MUC1 localization on cancer cell surface. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 6799–6806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Wang, Z.Q.; Bachvarova, M.; Morin, C.; Plante, M.; Gregoire, J.; Renaud, M.C.; Sebastianelli, A.; Bachvarov, D. Role of the polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 3 in ovarian cancer progression: Possible implications in abnormal mucin O-glycosylation. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 544–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Maverakis, E.; Kim, K.; Shimoda, M.; Gershwin, M.E.; Patel, F.; Wilken, R.; Raychaudhuri, S.; Ruhaak, L.R.; Lebrilla, C.B. Glycans in the immune system and the altered glycan theory of autoimmunity: A critical review. J. Autoimmun. 2015, 57, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wu, Y.M.; Nowack, D.D.; Omenn, G.S.; Haab, B.B. Mucin glycosylation is altered by pro-inflammatory signaling in pancreatic-cancer cells. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 1876–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lagow, E.L.; Carson, D.D. Synergistic stimulation of MUC1 expression in normal breast epithelia and breast cancer cells by interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α. J. Cell. Biochem. 2002, 86, 759–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Gaemers, I.C.; Vos, H.L.; Volders, H.H.; van der Valk, S.W.; Hilkens, J. A stat-responsive element in the promoter of the episialin/MUC1 gene is involved in its overexpression in carcinoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 6191–6199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Gao, J.; McConnell, M.J.; Yu, B.; Li, J.; Balko, J.M.; Black, E.P.; Johnson, J.O.; Lloyd, M.C.; Altiok, S.; Haura, E.B. MUC1 is a downstream target of STAT3 and regulates lung cancer cell survival and invasion. Int. J. Oncol. 2009, 35, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Clark, S.; McGuckin, M.A.; Hurst, T.; Ward, B.G. Effect of interferon-γ and TNF-α on MUC1 mucin expression in ovarian carcinoma cell lines. Dis. Markers 1994, 12, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Albertsmeyer, A.C.; Kakkassery, V.; Spurr-Michaud, S.; Beeks, O.; Gipson, I.K. Effect of pro-inflammatory mediators on membrane-associated mucins expressed by human ocular surface epithelial cells. Exp. Eye Res. 2010, 90, 444–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Chang, W.I.; Chang, J.Y.; Kim, Y.Y.; Lee, G.; Kho, H.S. MUC1 expression in the oral mucosal epithelial cells of the elderly. Arch. Oral Biol. 2011, 56, 885–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Dharmaraj, N.; Wang, P.; Carson, D.D. Cytokine and progesterone receptor interplay in the regulation of MUC1 gene expression. Mol. Endocrinol. 2010, 24, 2253–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Li, X.; Wang, L.; Nunes, D.P.; Troxler, R.F.; Offner, G.D. Pro-inflammatory cytokines up-regulate MUC1 gene expression in oral epithelial cells. J. Dent. Res. 2003, 82, 883–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Ishibashi, Y.; Imai, S.; Inouye, Y.; Okano, T.; Taniguchi, A. Effects of carbocisteine on sialyl-Lewis X expression in an airway carcinoma cell line stimulated with tumor necrosis factor-α. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2006, 530, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Rowse, G.J.; Tempero, R.M.; VanLith, M.L.; Hollingsworth, M.A.; Gendler, S.J. Tolerance and immunity to MUC1 in a human MUC1 transgenic murine model. Cancer Res. 1998, 58, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  84. Beatty, P.; Ranganathan, S.; Finn, O.J. Prevention of colitis-associated colon cancer using a vaccine to target abnormal expression of the MUC1 tumor antigen. Oncoimmunology 2012, 1, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Cascio, S.; Finn, O.J. Complex of MUC1, CIN85 and CBL in colon cancer progression and metastasis. Cancers 2015, 7, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Beatty, P.L.; Plevy, S.E.; Sepulveda, A.R.; Finn, O.J. Cutting edge: Transgenic expression of human MUC1 in IL-10-/-mice accelerates inflammatory bowel disease and progression to colon cancer. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 735–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Crocker, P.R.; Varki, A. Siglecs in the immune system. Immunology 2001, 103, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Varki, A.; Angata, T. Siglecs—The major subfamily of I-type lectins. Glycobiology 2006, 16, 1R–27R. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Takamiya, R.; Ohtsubo, K.; Takamatsu, S.; Taniguchi, N.; Angata, T. The interaction between Siglec-15 and tumor-associated sialyl-Tn antigen enhances TGF-β secretion from monocytes/macrophages through the DAP12-Syk pathway. Glycobiology 2013, 23, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Nath, D.; Hartnell, A.; Happerfield, L.; Miles, D.W.; Burchell, J.; Taylor-Papadimitriou, J.; Crocker, P.R. Macrophage-tumour cell interactions: Identification of MUC1 on breast cancer cells as a potential counter-receptor for the macrophage-restricted receptor, sialoadhesin. Immunology 1999, 98, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Carlos, C.A.; Dong, H.F.; Howard, O.M.; Oppenheim, J.J.; Hanisch, F.G.; Finn, O.J. Human tumor antigen MUC1 is chemotactic for immature dendritic cells and elicits maturation but does not promote Th1 type immunity. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 1628–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Cornelissen, L.A.; Van Vliet, S.J. A bitter sweet symphony: Immune responses to altered O-glycan epitopes in cancer. Biomolecules 2016, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Napoletano, C.; Rughetti, A.; Agervig Tarp, M.P.; Coleman, J.; Bennett, E.P.; Picco, G.; Sale, P.; Denda-Nagai, K.; Irimura, T.; Mandel, U.; et al. Tumor-associated Tn-MUC1 glycoform is internalized through the macrophage galactose-type C-type lectin and delivered to the HLA class I and II compartments in dendritic cells. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 8358–8367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Monti, P.; Leone, B.E.; Zerbi, A.; Balzano, G.; Cainarca, S.; Sordi, V.; Pontillo, M.; Mercalli, A.; Di Carlo, V.; Allavena, P.; et al. Tumor-derived MUC1 mucins interact with differentiating monocytes and induce IL-10highIL-12low regulatory dendritic cell. J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 7341–7349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Hiltbold, E.M.; Vlad, A.M.; Ciborowski, P.; Watkins, S.C.; Finn, O.J. The mechanism of unresponsiveness to circulating tumor antigen MUC1 is a block in intracellular sorting and processing by dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 2000, 165, 3730–3741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Carrascal, M.A.; Severino, P.F.; Guadalupe Cabral, M.; Silva, M.; Ferreira, J.A.; Calais, F.; Quinto, H.; Pen, C.; Ligeiro, D.; Santos, L.L.; et al. Sialyl Tn-expressing bladder cancer cells induce a tolerogenic phenotype in innate and adaptive immune cells. Mol. Oncol. 2014, 8, 753–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Waldhauer, I.; Steinle, A. NK cells and cancer immunosurveillance. Oncogene 2008, 27, 5932–5943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Hudak, J.E.; Canham, S.M.; Bertozzi, C.R. Glycocalyx engineering reveals a siglec-based mechanism for NK cell immunoevasion. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Jandus, C.; Boligan, K.F.; Chijioke, O.; Liu, H.; Dahlhaus, M.; Demoulins, T.; Schneider, C.; Wehrli, M.; Hunger, R.E.; Baerlocher, G.M.; et al. Interactions between Siglec-7/9 receptors and ligands influence NK cell-dependent tumor immunosurveillance. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 1810–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomolecules 06 00039 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of mucin 1 (MUC1) structure. Abbrevition: CT: cytoplasmic tail; ECD: extracellular domain; IR: imperfect repeat; TM: transmembrane; SEA: sea urchin sperm protein-enterokinase-agrin; VNTR: variable number of tandem repeat.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of mucin 1 (MUC1) structure. Abbrevition: CT: cytoplasmic tail; ECD: extracellular domain; IR: imperfect repeat; TM: transmembrane; SEA: sea urchin sperm protein-enterokinase-agrin; VNTR: variable number of tandem repeat.
Biomolecules 06 00039 g001
Biomolecules 06 00039 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic representation of O-Linked glycan biosynthesis
Figure 2. Schematic representation of O-Linked glycan biosynthesis
Biomolecules 06 00039 g002
Biomolecules 06 00039 g003 550
Figure 3. Model of MUC1 role in the tumor microenviroment. (1) Upon inflammatory stimuli, MUC1 induces activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) members and binds phopsho-p65; (2) MUC1/phospho-p65 complex translocates to the nucleus and associates with the promoter of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), promoting their transcription and expression; (3) Secretion of inflammatory cytokines recruits inflammatory cells, including myeloid cells and neutrophils, into the tumor site; (4) Inflammatory cells are a further source for pro-inflammatory and pro-tumorigenic cytokines that enhance tumor growth and progression. DC: dendritic cells; IKK: IκB kinase; IκB: phospho-inhibitor of kappa B.
Figure 3. Model of MUC1 role in the tumor microenviroment. (1) Upon inflammatory stimuli, MUC1 induces activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) members and binds phopsho-p65; (2) MUC1/phospho-p65 complex translocates to the nucleus and associates with the promoter of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), promoting their transcription and expression; (3) Secretion of inflammatory cytokines recruits inflammatory cells, including myeloid cells and neutrophils, into the tumor site; (4) Inflammatory cells are a further source for pro-inflammatory and pro-tumorigenic cytokines that enhance tumor growth and progression. DC: dendritic cells; IKK: IκB kinase; IκB: phospho-inhibitor of kappa B.
Biomolecules 06 00039 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cascio, S.; Finn, O.J. Intra- and Extra-Cellular Events Related to Altered Glycosylation of MUC1 Promote Chronic Inflammation, Tumor Progression, Invasion, and Metastasis. Biomolecules 2016, 6, 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom6040039

AMA Style

Cascio S, Finn OJ. Intra- and Extra-Cellular Events Related to Altered Glycosylation of MUC1 Promote Chronic Inflammation, Tumor Progression, Invasion, and Metastasis. Biomolecules. 2016; 6(4):39. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom6040039

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cascio, Sandra, and Olivera J. Finn. 2016. "Intra- and Extra-Cellular Events Related to Altered Glycosylation of MUC1 Promote Chronic Inflammation, Tumor Progression, Invasion, and Metastasis" Biomolecules 6, no. 4: 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom6040039

APA Style

Cascio, S., & Finn, O. J. (2016). Intra- and Extra-Cellular Events Related to Altered Glycosylation of MUC1 Promote Chronic Inflammation, Tumor Progression, Invasion, and Metastasis. Biomolecules, 6(4), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom6040039

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop