Spatiotemporal Change Analysis of Earthquake Emergency Information Based on Microblog Data: A Case Study of the “8.8” Jiuzhaigou Earthquake
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Related Work
2.1. Microblog Data for Disaster Damage Assessment
2.2. Microblog Data for Mining Spatio-Temporal Disaster Information
3. Data and Methods
3.1. Data
3.2. Overview of Research Methods
3.3. Text Urgency Grading and Classification for Earthquake Emergency Response
3.4. Regional Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis Based on Text Urgency Grading
3.4.1. Getis-Ord Gi* Hot Spot Analysis
3.4.2. Anselin’s Local Moran’s I
3.5. Kernel Density Estimates
4. Results
4.1. Classification Accuracy Evaluation
4.2. 24 h after the Earthquake
4.3. Seven Days after the Earthquake
4.3.1. Temporal Changes and Spatial Distribution of Different Categories
4.3.2. Spatial-Temporal Variation Analysis of Rescue Operation and Help-Seeking Microblogs
5. Discussion and Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
TF-IDF | Term Frequency-inverse Document Frequency. |
WGS84 | World Geodetic System 1984 Datum. |
CNN | Convolutional Neural Network. |
References
- Chaoxu, X.; Gaozhong, N.; Xiwei, F.; Junxue, Z.; Xiaoke, P. Research on the application of mobile phone location signal data in earthquake emergency work: A case study of Jiuzhaigou earthquake. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e215361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yates, D.; Paquette, S. Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: A case study of 126 the 2010 Haitian earthquake. In Proceedings of the 73rd ASIS&T Annual Meeting on Navigating Streams in 127 an Information Ecosystem-Volume 47, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 22–27 October 2010; American Society for Information Science: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2010; p. 42. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, L.; Xi, L.; Song, G.; Li, G.; Kang, C.; Ye, Z.; Chi, G.; Li, S. Social Sensing: A New Approach to Understanding Our Socioeconomic Environments. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2015, 127, 512–530. [Google Scholar]
- Kwon, H.Y.; Kang, Y.O. Risk analysis and visualization for detecting signs of flood disaster in Twitter. Spat. Inf. Res. 2016, 24, 127–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiaohui, S.; Qunyan, Z.; Xiaodong, Z.; Xu, Z.; Lin, L.; Junming, L.; Jianxi, H.; Wei, S. Analysis on Macroscopic Anomalies before and after Lushan MS7.0 Earthquake based on Weibo. Technol. Earthq. Disaster Prev. 2013, 8, 451–458. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- De Longueville, B.; Smith, R.S.; Luraschi, G. Omg, from here, i can see the flames!: A use case of mining location based social networks to acquire spatio-temporal data on forest fires. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Workshop on Location Based Social Networks, Seattle, WA, USA, 3 November 2009; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 73–80. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, D.; Cui, Y. Disaster early warning and damage assessment analysis using social media data and geo-location information. Decis. Support Syst. 2018, 111, 48–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, X.; Chen, C. Using social media data to understand and assess disasters. Nat. Hazards 2014, 74, 837–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakaki, T.; Okazaki, M.; Matsuo, Y. Earthquake shakes Twitter users: Real-time event detection by social sensors. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, Raleigh, NC, USA, 26–30 April 2010; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 851–860. [Google Scholar]
- Simon, T.; Adini, B.; El-Hadid, M.; Aharonson-Daniel, L. Competing to the rescue-leveraging social media for cross border collaboration in life-saving rescue operations. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2013, 31, 1618–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chunyang, L.; Guangfa, L.; Mingfeng, Z.; Weiyang, W.; Wenfu, Z.; Jinhuang, L.; Chao, D. Assessing the Effectiveness of Social Media Data in Mapping the Distribution of Typhoon Disasters. J. Geo-Inf. Sci. 2018, 20, 807–816. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Yuan, F.; Liu, R. Feasibility study of using crowdsourcing to identify critical affected areas for rapid damage assessment: Hurricane Matthew case study. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2018, 28, 758–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, Q.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Deng, X.; Ma, Y. A new crowdsourcing model to assess disaster using microblog data in typhoon Haiyan. Nat. Hazards 2016, 84, 1241–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Y.; Huang, Q.; Wu, K. Understanding social media data for disaster management. Nat. Hazards 2015, 79, 1663–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Ye, X.; Tsou, M.H. Spatial, temporal, and content analysis of Twitter for wildfire hazards. Nat. Hazards 2016, 83, 523–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, Y.; Huang, C.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, J. Microblogging after a major disaster in China: A case study of the 2010 Yushu earthquake. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Hangzhou, China, 19–23 March 2011; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 25–34. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J.; Bae, J.; Hastak, M. Emergency information diffusion on online social media during storm Cindy in US. Int. J. Inform. Manag. 2018, 40, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Q.; Xiao, Y. Geographic Situational Awareness: Mining Tweets for Disaster Preparedness, Emergency Response, Impact, and Recovery. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2015, 4, 1549–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, T.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, B.; Wang, G.; Li, X.; Zheng, H.; Zhao, B.Y. The power of comments: Fostering social interactions in microblog networks. Front. Comput. Sci. 2016, 10, 889–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Q.; Abel, F.; Houben, G.F.; Yu, Y. A Comparative Study of Users’ Microblogging Behavior on Sina Weibo and Twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, Montreal, QC, Canada, 16–20 July 2012; pp. 88–101. [Google Scholar]
- Murzintcev, N.; Cheng, C. Disaster Hashtags in Social Media. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2017, 6, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Resch, B.; Usländer, F.; Havas, C. Combining machine-learning topic models and spatiotemporal analysis of social media data for disaster footprint and damage assessment. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2017, 8, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, L.; Zhang, D. NLPIR: A theoretical framework for applying natural language processing to information retrieval. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2003, 54, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baidu Map API. Available online: https://lbsyun.baidu.com/ (accessed on 2 August 2019).
- General Office of the State Council. National Earthquake Emergency Plan. Available online: http://www.gov.cn/yjgl/2012-09/21/content_2230337.htm (accessed on 12 August 2019).
- Zhang, X.; Zhao, J.; LeCun, Y. Character-level convolutional networks for text classification. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems; Mit Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 649–657. [Google Scholar]
- Abadi, M.; Agarwal, A.; Barham, P.; Brevdo, E.; Chen, Z.; Citro, C.; Corrado, G.S.; Davis, A.; Dean, J.; Devin, M. Tensorflow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1603.04467. [Google Scholar]
- Getis, A.; Ord, J.K. The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics. Geogr. Anal. 1992, 24, 189–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anselin, L. Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geogr. Anal. 1995, 27, 93–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silverman, B.W. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. In Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, 1st ed.; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1986; p. 200. [Google Scholar]
- Wubuli, A.; Xue, F.; Jiang, D.; Yao, X.; Upur, H.; Wushouer, Q. Socio-demographic predictors and distribution of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in Xinjiang, China: A spatial analysis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rui, L.; Xu, J.; Jing, Z.; Yunfan, L. GIS based research on the spatial distribution of population density in illegal buildings in Shenzhen City. Remote Sens. Land Resour. 2018, 30, 233–237. [Google Scholar]
- Swetnam, T.; Lynch, A.; Falk, D.; Yool, S.; Guertin, D. Discriminating disturbance from natural variation with LiDAR in semi-arid forests in the southwestern USA. Ecosphere 2015, 6, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venturini, L.; Di Corso, E. Analyzing spatial data from twitter during a disaster. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Boston, MA, USA, 11–14 December 2017; pp. 3779–3783. [Google Scholar]
Categories | Description | Level Ⅰ | Lever Ⅱ | Level Ⅲ |
---|---|---|---|---|
Feelings | The somatosensory of earthquake shock, such as a house shaking | No feelings, no shaking, did not feel earthquake, slept like a log, did not feel anything | Felt the shake, felt the earthquake, felt the shaking for a while, slight shaking, shaking was obvious, woken up by the shaking | Strong feeling of earthquake, severe shaking, crazy shakes, roused from sleep, frightened to get up, heard a loud noise, heartbeat accelerating |
Emotional expression | Personal thoughts or sentiment about earthquake, such as prayers and blessings | Calm, indifferent, smile, numb, peace of mind, bored, lucky | Worry, fear, uneasy, good, afraid, depressed, nervous, dare not sleep, unfortunately | Shivering, scared to death, urgent, scared to cry, highly panicking, shocked, collapsed, anxious, torn heart, difficult to breath |
Seismic regime and losses | Earthquake level, secondary disasters and other reports and explanations | No reaction was observed | The lights are shaking, the table is shaking, the bed is shaking, the glass is falling, people are shaking, things are ringing | The lights fell down, building damage, a loud noise, the roof collapsed, barrier lake formed |
Casualties | Reports on deaths and injures | No casualties | Injury, blood donation, mild illness | Lost contact, heavy casualties, many victims, bodies, dying, serious injuries |
Transportation | Information related to traffic, electricity or network conditions | Communication and roads were unaffected by the earthquake | Road restrictions, partially damaged roads, telephone service slightly damaged | Road breaks, broken lifelines, road blockades, communication breakdown |
Rescue operation | Rescue actions and medical treatment provided by government and society | Fire brigade, rescue team, search and rescue dogs, helicopter | ||
Relief supplies | Information on the delivery of supplies | Food, tents, quilts and other daily necessities | ||
Help seeking | Seeking help for shortages, trapped people, or finding relatives | Help, emergency medicine, emergency proliferation, blood bank emergency | ||
Disaster-reduction knowledge | Common sense of earthquake preparedness and emergency response | Knowledge of earthquake prevention, first aid methods, resisting earthquakes, shock absorbers | ||
Donation | Release of donation information or description of donation amount | Donation information, donation amount |
Categories | Precision | Recall | F1-Score | Number |
---|---|---|---|---|
Feelings | 82.0% | 93.0% | 87.0% | 899 |
Disaster-reduction knowledge | 88.0% | 73.0% | 80.0% | 318 |
Seismic regime and losses | 90.0% | 84.0% | 87.0% | 1970 |
Transportation | 85.0% | 78.0% | 81.0% | 938 |
Casualties | 92.0% | 92.0% | 92.0% | 758 |
Help seeking | 86.0% | 88.0% | 87.0% | 527 |
Rescue operation | 80.0% | 83.0% | 83.0% | 1186 |
Relief supplies | 94.0% | 63.0% | 75.0% | 642 |
Emotional expression | 93.0% | 97.0% | 95.0% | 2379 |
Donation | 84.0% | 88.0% | 87.0% | 436 |
Total | 87.4% | 83.9% | 85.4% | 10,053 |
Categories | Number |
---|---|
Feelings | 2487 |
Disaster-reduction knowledge | 231 |
Seismic regime and losses | 526 |
Transportation | 1101 |
Casualties | 231 |
Help seeking | 2832 |
Rescue operation | 873 |
Relief supplies | 221 |
Emotional expression | 12,120 |
Donation | 650 |
Category | Key Word |
---|---|
Search and rescue | Rescue; search; evacuate; be rescued; be saved |
Source of rescue force | Assemble at; rush to; fly to; firemen/rescue team from |
Source of victims | Residents of;tourists/visitor from |
Hospital | Transporting the wounded; hospital; medical treatment; cure |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Xing, Z.; Su, X.; Liu, J.; Su, W.; Zhang, X. Spatiotemporal Change Analysis of Earthquake Emergency Information Based on Microblog Data: A Case Study of the “8.8” Jiuzhaigou Earthquake. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8, 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8080359
Xing Z, Su X, Liu J, Su W, Zhang X. Spatiotemporal Change Analysis of Earthquake Emergency Information Based on Microblog Data: A Case Study of the “8.8” Jiuzhaigou Earthquake. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2019; 8(8):359. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8080359
Chicago/Turabian StyleXing, Ziyao, Xiaohui Su, Junming Liu, Wei Su, and Xiaodong Zhang. 2019. "Spatiotemporal Change Analysis of Earthquake Emergency Information Based on Microblog Data: A Case Study of the “8.8” Jiuzhaigou Earthquake" ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 8, no. 8: 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8080359
APA StyleXing, Z., Su, X., Liu, J., Su, W., & Zhang, X. (2019). Spatiotemporal Change Analysis of Earthquake Emergency Information Based on Microblog Data: A Case Study of the “8.8” Jiuzhaigou Earthquake. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(8), 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8080359