Advances in Composite Materials for Space Applications: A Comprehensive Literature Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Boundary and Loading Conditions of Space Structures and Applications
- Radiation Resistance: Spacecraft and satellites are exposed to high levels of cosmic radiation and solar particle events. Materials need improved resistance to degradation from gamma rays, X-rays, and energetic particles.
- Thermal Stability: Extreme temperature fluctuations in space require materials with high thermal resistance, low thermal expansion, and stability under thermal cycling.
- Strength: Structural materials need to be both lightweight and extremely strong to optimize payload efficiency, especially for launch vehicles and deep-space missions.
- Durability Against Atomic Oxygen Erosion: Low Earth orbit environments expose materials to highly reactive atomic oxygen, which erodes polymers and some metals.
- Low Outgassing: Materials must have minimal volatile emissions in vacuum conditions to prevent contamination of sensitive instruments and optics.
- Self-Healing and Repairable Surfaces: Self-repairing materials could help mitigate micro-meteoroid and debris damage in space, improving the longevity of spacecraft structures.
- Cryogenic Toughness: Materials used in cryogenic fuel tanks and components must maintain mechanical integrity at extremely low temperatures.
- Electromagnetic Shielding: Advanced materials are needed to protect electronics from space weather effects, including electromagnetic interference and radiation-induced failures.
- Improved Adhesion and Coatings: Space coatings need better adhesion and wear resistance for thermal control, radiation shielding, and reducing contamination.
- 3D Printability and In Situ Manufacturing Adaptability: Materials must be optimized for additive manufacturing in space, enabling in-orbit repairs and construction.
3. Types of Space Composites
4. Mechanical Response
4.1. Vibration and Damping
4.2. Mechanical Properties/Behavior
4.3. Hypervelocity Impact
5. Thermal Response
6. Electrical, Electromagnetic, and Radiation Shielding
6.1. Electrical Conductivity
6.2. Radiation and Shielding
7. Environmental Degradation and Aging
8. Advanced Composites
8.1. Shape Memory Composites
8.2. Self-Healing Composites
8.3. Smart/Sensorized Composites
9. Composites in Deployable Structures
10. Computational Models
11. Conclusions
- Expanding Applications: Composites are increasingly used in space structures, yet their application remains limited. There is a pressing need for new materials capable of withstanding combined loading conditions characteristic of the space environment.
- Limited Publications: The number of publications on this topic is relatively small compared to the wealth of information available online. This limitation is partly due to much of the research being conducted within national or cooperative space programs, which often restricts public dissemination.
- Material Challenges: The harsh space environment demands advanced mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties. Research is ongoing into novel matrix and fiber materials, hybrid composites, lattice reinforcements, and nanoparticle enhancements. Although significant improvements in properties have been achieved, current composites remain brittle and weak under cryogenic conditions and are prone to degradation at high temperatures. These challenges are particularly pronounced for large-volume applications. Thus, further work is required for the optimization of composite structures in the space environment.
- Role of Computational Models and AI: Computational models have primarily been applied to deployable structures. Combined with artificial intelligence, they hold great potential for advancing the simulation-driven design of next-generation composite materials.
- Rapid Developments: Deployable structures, structural health monitoring (SHM) concepts, and smart composites are advancing rapidly, offering promising avenues for the future of composite space applications.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- May, M.; Rupakula, G.D.; Matura, P. Non-Polymer-Matrix Composite Materials for Space Applications. Compos. Part C Open Access 2020, 3, 100057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ince, J.C.; Peerzada, M.; Mathews, L.D.; Pai, A.R.; Al-qatatsheh, A.; Abbasi, S.; Yin, Y.; Hameed, N.; Duffy, A.R.; Lau, A.K.; et al. Overview of Emerging Hybrid and Composite Materials for Space Applications. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2023, 6, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiwary, A.; Kumar, R.; Chohan, J.S. A Review on Characteristics of Composite and Advanced Materials Used for Aerospace Applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 51, 865–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vickers, J.H.; Tate, L.C.; Gaddis, S.W.; Neal, R.E. Composites Materials and Manufacturing Technologies for Space Applications. In Proceedings of the NASA-Sponsored Technical Interchange Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA, 6–7 May 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Narayana, K.J.; Gupta Burela, R. A Review of Recent Research on Multifunctional Composite Materials and Structures with Their Applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 5580–5590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sairajan, K.K.; Aglietti, G.S.; Mani, K.M. A Review of Multifunctional Structure Technology for Aerospace Applications. Acta Astronaut. 2016, 120, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marchetti, M.; Morganti, F.; Mucciante, L.; Bruno, C. Damping of Composite Plate for Space Structures: Prediction and Measurement Methods. Acta Astronaut. 1987, 15, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carpenter, A. New Aspects Relating to the Behaviour of Composites in Space. Compos. Eng. 1992, 2, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De, O.C.; Cintra, M.P.; Santos, A.L.; Silva, P.; Ueda, M.; Janke, A.; Jehnichen, D.; Simon, F.; Botelho, E.C. Characterization of SixOyNz Coating on CF/PPS Composites for Space Applications. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2018, 335, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kravchuk, L.V.; Buiskikh, K.P.; Derevyanko, I.I.; Potapov, O.M. Load-Bearing Capacity of Elements of Composite Shell Structures in Rocket and Space Engineering Made of Composite Materials. Strength Mater. 2022, 54, 613–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giusto, G.; Totaro, G.; Spena, P.; De Nicola, F.; Di Caprio, F.; Zallo, A.; Grilli, A.; Mancini, V.; Kiryenko, S.; Das, S.; et al. Composite Grid Structure Technology for Space Applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 34, 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pagani, A.; Augello, R.; Carrera, E. Numerical Simulation of Deployable Ultra-Thin Composite Shell Structures for Space Applications and Comparison with Experiments. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 2023, 30, 1591–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Zhou, H.; Ma, J.; Xiong, L.; Ren, S.; Sun, M.; Wu, H.; Jiang, S. Space Deployable Bistable Composite Structures with C-Cross Section Based on Machine Learning and Multi-Objective Optimization. Compos. Struct. 2022, 297, 115983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flanagan, M.; Grogan, D.M.; Goggins, J.; Appel, S.; Doyle, K.; Leen, S.B.; Ó Brádaigh, C.M. Permeability of Carbon Fibre PEEK Composites for Cryogenic Storage Tanks of Future Space Launchers. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2017, 101, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naito, M.; Kitamura, H.; Koike, M.; Kusano, H.; Kusumoto, T.; Uchihori, Y.; Endo, T.; Hagiwara, Y.; Kiyono, N.; Kodama, H.; et al. Applicability of Composite Materials for Space Radiation Shielding of Spacecraft. Life Sci. Space Res. 2021, 31, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walgren, P.; Nevin, S.; Hartl, D. Design, Experimental Demonstration, and Validation of a Composite Morphing Space Radiator. J. Compos. Mater. 2023, 57, 347–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pastore, R.; Delfini, A.; Albano, M.; Vricella, A.; Marchetti, M.; Santoni, F.; Piergentili, F. Outgassing Effect in Polymeric Composites Exposed to Space Environment Thermal-Vacuum Conditions. Acta Astronaut. 2020, 170, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J.-H.; Kim, C.-G. Low Earth Orbit Space Environment Simulation and Its Effects on Graphite/Epoxy Composites. Compos. Struct. 2006, 72, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martins, M.; Gomes, R.; Pina, L.; Pereira, C.; Reichmann, O.; Teti, D.; Correia, N.; Rocha, N. Highly Conductive Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composite Electronic Box: Out-Of-Autoclave Manufacturing for Space Applications. Fibers 2018, 6, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Neill, M.; Hollaway, L. Vibrational Characteristics of Composite Structures for Space. Compos. Eng. 1992, 2, 177–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaulin, V.; Chevalier, J.-M.; Arrigoni, M.; Lescoute, E. Characterization of a Carbon Fiber Composite Material for Space Applications under High Strains and Stresses: Modeling and Validation by Experiments. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 128, 195901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peter, P.; Remanan, M.; Bhowmik, S.; Jayanarayanan, K. Polyaryl Ether Ketone Based Composites for Space Applications: Influence of Electron Beam Radiation on Mechanical and Thermal Properties. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 24, 490–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Startsev, O.V.; Nikishin, E.F. Aging of Polymer Composite Materials Exposed to the Conditions in Outer Space. Mech. Compos. Mater. 1994, 29, 338–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paillous, A.; Pailler, C. Degradation of Multiply Polymer-Matrix Composites Induced by Space Environment. Composites 1994, 25, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y.; Suliga, A.; Brinkmeyer, A.; Schenk, M.; Hamerton, I. Atomic Oxygen Degradation Mechanisms of Epoxy Composites for Space Applications. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2019, 166, 108–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.; Choi, C.; Sathish Kumar, S.K.; Kim, C.-G. Hypervelocity Impact on Flexible Curable Composites and Pure Fabric Layer Bumpers for Inflatable Space Structures. Compos. Struct. 2017, 176, 1061–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iskanderova, Z.A.; Kleiman, J.; Morison, W.D.; Tennyson, R.C. Erosion Resistance and Durability Improvement of Polymers and Composites in Space Environment by Ion Implantation. Mater. Chem. Phys. 1998, 54, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crema, L.B.; Barboni, R.; Castellani, A. Thermoelastic Behaviour of Space Structures in Composite Materials. Acta Astronaut. 1986, 13, 547–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deruyttere, A.; Froyen, L.; De Bondt, S. Melting and Solidification of Metallic Composites in Space. Adv. Space Res. 1986, 6, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Connor, A.; Park, C.; Baciak, J.E.; Manuel, M.V. Mitigating Space Radiation Using Magnesium(-Lithium) and Boron Carbide Composites. Acta Astronaut. 2024, 216, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, M.; Zheng, F.; Wang, Q.; Wang, T.; Liang, Y. Friction and Wear Behaviors of Carbon and Aramid Fibers Reinforced Polyimide Composites in Simulated Space Environment. Tribol. Int. 2015, 92, 246–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Li, K.; Shi, X.; Li, H.; Ma, C.; Hu, C.; Wang, L.; Cheng, C. Effects of Space Extreme Temperature Cycling on Carbon/Carbon-(Zr-Si-B-C-O) Composites Performances. Corros. Sci. 2019, 147, 212–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colas, G.; Saulot, A.; Michel, Y.; Filleter, T.; Merstallinger, A. Experimental Analysis of Friction and Wear of Self-Lubricating Composites Used for Dry Lubrication of Ball Bearing for Space Applications. Lubricants 2021, 9, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garibotti, J.F.; Cwiertny, A.J.; Johnson, R. Development of Advanced Composite Materials and Geodetic Structures for Future Space Systems. Acta Astronaut. 1982, 9, 473–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, T.; Khalid, M.Y.; Andrew, J.J.; Ali, M.A.; Zheng, L.; Umer, R. Co-Cured GNP Films with Liquid Thermoplastic/Glass Fiber Composites for Superior EMI Shielding and Impact Properties for Space Applications. Compos. Commun. 2023, 44, 101767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seibers, Z.; Orr, M.; Collier, G.S.; Henriquez, A.; Gabel, M.; Shofner, M.L.; La Saponara, V.; Reynolds, J. Chemically Functionalized Reduced Graphene Oxide as Additives in Polyethylene Composites for Space Applications. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2020, 60, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cherkashina, N.I.; Pavlenko, V.I.; Noskov, A.V.; Novosadov, N.I.; Samoilova, E.S. Using Multilayer Polymer PI/Pb Composites for Protection against X-Ray Bremsstrahlung in Outer Space. Acta Astronaut. 2020, 170, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cha, J.-H.; Jang, W.-H.; Noh, J.-E.; Choi, W.-H.; Kim, C.-G. A Space Stealth and Cosmic Radiation Shielding Composite: Polydopamine-Coating and Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube Grafting onto an Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene/Hydrogen-Rich Benzoxazine Composite. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2022, 230, 109711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vartak, D.; Ghotekar, Y.; Munjal, B.S.; Bhatt, P.; Satyanarayana, B.; Lal, A.K. Characterization of Tailored Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Based Composite for Geo-Space Payload Components. J. Electron. Mater. 2021, 50, 4442–4449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Earp, B.; Hubbard, J.; Tracy, A.; Sakoda, D.; Luhrs, C. Electrical Behavior of CNT Epoxy Composites under In-Situ Simulated Space Environments. Compos. Part B Eng. 2021, 219, 108874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cherkashina, N.I.; Pavlenko, V.I.; Noskov, A.V.; Romanyuk, D.S.; Sidelnikov, R.V.; Kashibadze, N.V. Effect of Electron Irradiation on Polyimide Composites Based on Track Membranes for Space Systems. Adv. Space Res. 2022, 70, 3249–3256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeremy Jeba Samuel, J.; Ramadoss, R.; Gunasekaran, K.N.; Logesh, K.; Gnanaraj, S.J.P.; Munaf, A.A. Studies on Mechanical Properties and Characterization of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Hybrid Composite for Aero Space Application. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 47, 4438–4443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.; Wang, S.; Li, W.; Chen, Z. Mechanical Behavior of C/SiC Composites under Simulated Space Environments. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2012, 534, 408–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Q.; Tian, K.; Liu, S.; Zhu, Q.; Zheng, S.; Chen, J.; Wang, L.; Cheng, S.; Fan, Z.; Fan, X.; et al. A Combination of “Inner–Outer Skeleton” Strategy to Improve the Mechanical Properties and Heat Resistance of Polyimide Composite Aerogels as Composite Sandwich Structures for Space Vehicles. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2024, 252, 110620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, X.; Yin, C.; Huang, J.; Wen, X.; Zhao, Z.; Wu, J.; Liu, S. Hypervelocity Impact of TiB2-Based Composites as Front Bumpers for Space Shield Applications. Mater. Des. 2016, 97, 473–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobzev, V.A.; Chechenin, N.G.; Bukunov, K.A.; Vorobyeva, E.A.; Makunin, A.V. Structural and Functional Properties of Composites with Carbon Nanotubes for Space Applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 26096–26103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nam, Y.-W.; Sathish Kumar, S.K.; Ankem, V.A.; Kim, C.-G. Multi-Functional Aramid/Epoxy Composite for Stealth Space Hypervelocity Impact Shielding System. Compos. Struct. 2018, 193, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shemelya, C.; De La Rosa, A.; Torrado, A.R.; Yu, K.; Domanowski, J.; Bonacuse, P.J.; Martin, R.E.; Juhasz, M.; Hurwitz, F.; Wicker, R.B.; et al. Anisotropy of Thermal Conductivity in 3D Printed Polymer Matrix Composites for Space Based Cube Satellites. Addit. Manuf. 2017, 16, 186–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrara, M.; Rinaldi, M.; Pigliaru, L.; Cecchini, F.; Nanni, F. Investigating the Use of 3D Printed Soft Magnetic PEEK -based Composite for Space Compliant Electrical Motors. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2022, 139, 52150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyde, A.R. Ceramic Matrix Composites: High-Performance Materials for Space Application. Mater. Des. 1993, 14, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhanasekar, S.; Ganesan, A.T.; Rani, T.L.; Vinjamuri, V.K.; Nageswara Rao, M.; Shankar, E.; Dharamvir; Kumar, P.S.; Misganaw Golie, W. A Comprehensive Study of Ceramic Matrix Composites for Space Applications. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 2022, 6160591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pellegrini, C.; Balat-Pichelin, M.; Rapaud, O.; Bêche, E. Oxidation Resistance and Emissivity of Diboride-Based Composites Containing Tantalum Disilicide in Air Plasma up to 2600 K for Space Applications. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 27878–27890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delkowski, M.; Smith, C.T.G.; Anguita, J.V.; Silva, S.R.P. Increasing the Robustness and Crack Resistivity of High-Performance Carbon Fiber Composites for Space Applications. iScience 2021, 24, 102692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Echter, M.A.; Gillmer, S.R.; Silver, M.J.; Reid, B.M.; Martinez, R.E. A Multifunctional High Strain Composite (HSC) Hinge for Deployable in-Space Optomechanics. Smart Mater. Struct. 2020, 29, 105010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.Z.; Younes, M.H.; Zaib, A.; Farooq, U.; Khan, A.; Zahid, M.D.; Hussan, U. Investigation of Space Charge Behavior in Self-Healing Epoxy Resin Composites. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 19646–19654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andreades, C.; Malfense Fierro, G.P.; Meo, M.; Ciampa, F. Nonlinear Ultrasonic Inspection of Smart Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastic Composites with Embedded Piezoelectric Lead Zirconate Titanate Transducers for Space Applications. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2019, 30, 2995–3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oppili Prasad, L.; Sreelal Pillai, S.; Sambandan, S. Micro-Strain and Temperature Sensors for Space Applications with Graphite-PDMS Composite. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Flexible and Printable Sensors and Systems (FLEPS), Glasgow, UK, 8–10 July 2019; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
- Moskvichev, E.V.; Larichkin, A.Y. Study of the Functional and Mechanical Properties of a Shape Memory Polymer Composite for a Space Antenna Reflector. Inorg. Mater. 2021, 57, 1491–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Margoy, D.; Gouzman, I.; Grossman, E.; Bolker, A.; Eliaz, N.; Verker, R. Epoxy-Based Shape Memory Composite for Space Applications. Acta Astronaut. 2021, 178, 908–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santo, L.; Quadrini, F.; Bellisario, D.; Iorio, L.; Proietti, A.; De Groh, K.K. Effect of the LEO Space Environment on the Functional Performances of Shape Memory Polymer Composites. Compos. Commun. 2024, 48, 101913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kollerov, M.Y.; Lukina, E.A.; Gusev, D.E.; Vinogradov, R.E. Functional Metal-Polymer Composite Materials with Reversible Shape Memory Effect for Aeronautical and Space Structures. Russ. Aeronaut. 2020, 63, 730–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Hao, Y.; Ge, X.; Cao, D. Coupled Vibration Analysis of the Spacecraft with the Flexible Shaft and Solar Panels Assembly. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2024, 151, 109259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baier, H. 8.18 Design of Fiber Composite Aerospace Structures Under Vibration Loads. In Comprehensive Composite Materials II; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 351–366. ISBN 978-0-08-100534-7. [Google Scholar]
- Marchetti, M.; Morganti, F.; Tizzi, S. Evaluation of the Built-in Stresses and Residual Distortions on Cured Composites for Space Antenna Reflectors Applications. Compos. Struct. 1987, 7, 267–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrari, L.; Barbato, M.; Esser, B.; Petkov, I.; Kuhn, M.; Gianella, S.; Barcena, J.; Jimenez, C.; Francesconi, D.; Liedtke, V.; et al. Sandwich Structured Ceramic Matrix Composites with Periodic Cellular Ceramic Cores: An Active Cooled Thermal Protection for Space Vehicles. Compos. Struct. 2016, 154, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Courbon, E.; D’Ans, P.; Permyakova, A.; Skrylnyk, O.; Steunou, N.; Degrez, M.; Frère, M. Further Improvement of the Synthesis of Silica Gel and CaCl2 Composites: Enhancement of Energy Storage Density and Stability over Cycles for Solar Heat Storage Coupled with Space Heating Applications. Solar Energy 2017, 157, 532–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, C.; Zhu, G.; Tanaka, Y.; Miyake, H.; Sato, K.; Chen, X.; Paramane, A. Space Charge Performance of Epoxy Composites with Improved Thermal Property at High Temperature under High Electric Field. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2022, 139, 51877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pernigoni, L.; Lafont, U.; Grande, A.M. Self-Healing Materials for Space Applications: Overview of Present Development and Major Limitations. CEAS Space J. 2021, 13, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aïssa, B.; Tagziria, K.; Haddad, E.; Jamroz, W.; Loiseau, J.; Higgins, A.; Asgar-Khan, M.; Hoa, S.V.; Merle, P.G.; Therriault, D.; et al. The Self-Healing Capability of Carbon Fibre Composite Structures Subjected to Hypervelocity Impacts Simulating Orbital Space Debris. ISRN Nanomater. 2012, 2012, 351205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, B.; Yu, X.; Liang, D.; Liu, X.; Yang, X. Numerical and Experimental Investigation on Dynamics of Deployable Space Telescope Experiencing Deployment and Attitude Adjustment Motions Coupled with Laminated Composite Shell. Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach. 2022, 50, 268–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morozov, E.V.; Lopatin, A.V.; Khakhlenkova, A.A. Finite-Element Modelling, Analysis and Design of Anisogrid Composite Lattice Spoke of an Umbrella-Type Deployable Reflector of Space Antenna. Compos. Struct. 2022, 286, 115323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.-W.; Bai, J.-B. Folding Behaviour of a Deployable Composite Cabin for Space Habitats—Part 1: Experimental and Numerical Investigation. Compos. Struct. 2022, 302, 116244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.-W.; Bai, J.-B. Folding Behaviour of a Deployable Composite Cabin for Space Habitats—Part 2: Analytical Investigation. Compos. Struct. 2022, 297, 115929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.-W.; Bai, J.-B.; Fantuzzi, N. Analytical Models for Predicting Folding Behaviour of Thin-Walled Tubular Deployable Composite Boom for Space Applications. Acta Astronaut. 2023, 208, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Material | Application | Loading |
---|---|---|
CFRPs | Damping [7] Outgassing and contamination [8] Coatings [9] Load-bearing structure [10] Grid structures [11] Deployable structures [12,13] Hydrogen permeability [14] Radiation shielding [15] Radiator [16] Outgassing effect [17] Space conditions [18] Electronic box [19] | Vibration [20] Dynamic loading [21] Mechanical–thermal [22] Aging/Degradation [23,24,25] Hypervelocity impact [26] Erosion [27] |
Kevlar/epoxy | Damping [7] Outgassing effect [17] | Thermoelastic [28] |
Metal matrix composites | Melting, solidification [29] | Radiation [30] |
Aramide/polyimide | Friction and wear [31] | Tribological testing |
Carbon/polyimide | ||
Carbon/carbon- (Zr-Si-B-C-O) | Extreme temperature [32] | |
GFRPs | Self-lubrication [33] Geodetic beams [34] Deployable structures [12] EMI shielding [35] | Outgassing effect [17] |
Nanofilled CFRPs | Radiation shielding [36,37,38] | Thermal–electrical [19,39,40] Electron irradiation [41] |
Bio-based CFRPs | Space applications | Mechanical [42] |
Carbon/SiC | Coatings | Mechanical [43] |
Hybrid CFRPs | Spacecraft fuselages | Mechanical [42,44] |
TiB2/TiC/Ni | Space shielding systems Front shield bumpers | Hypervelocity impact [38,45,46,47] |
Zylon/epoxy | ||
Twaron/epoxy | ||
Nanofilled GFRPs | ||
Aramid/epoxy | ||
Silver/epoxy (3D printed) | Thermal conductivity [48] | |
Iron/PEEK (3D printed) | Magnetic properties [49] | |
Ceramic matrix composites | Space applications [50,51] Oxidation resistance [52] | Mechanical Thermal |
Multifunctional CFRPs | Fracture toughness [53] Deployable structures [54] Self-healing [55] Structural health monitoring [56] Micro-strain and temperature sensing [57] Shape memory [58,59,60] | Thermal shock Nano-indentation Mechanical Vibration |
Ti/polymer | Shape memory [61] | Thermal cycling |
Author | Subject | Method | Notable Results |
---|---|---|---|
Marchetti et al. [7] | Structural damping of composites | Experimental and numerical | Dissipation energy estimation and correlation |
O’Neill and Hollaway [20] | Dynamic characteristics of skeletal configurations | Experimental and numerical | Allocation of the supports enhances modal behavior |
Cao et al. [62] | Connecting conditions of shaft/solar panel | Analytical | Higher-order frequency relative error less than 4% |
Author | Subject | Method | Notable Results |
---|---|---|---|
Garibotti et al. [34] | Development of composite geodetic beam | Experimental | Weight can be minimized via varying beams’ diameters |
Crema et al. [28] | Evaluation of mechanical/thermal properties | Experimental | Greater thermal expansion of kevlar fabric than CFRP |
Kravchuk et al. [10] | Annular wound shell evaluation under combined loading | Experimental | Thermal expansion is less stable in circular direction |
Peter et al. [22] | Thermomechanical evaluation of F-CF-reinforced PAEK after irradiation | Experimental | Irradiation slightly decreased the ultimate strain of the material |
Sun et al. [44] | Introduction of new thermoplastic–thermosetting polyimide aerogel | Experimental/manufacturing | High compressive strength (0.85 MPa), high compressive modulus (3.93 MPa) |
Jeremy J. Samuel et al. [42] | Evaluation of rubber particles dispersion into the composite | Experimental | Natural rubber increased both tensile and flexural strength |
Delkowski et al. [53] | Development of plasma-enhanced poly(p-xylene) superlattice material | Experimental/manufacturing | The structures presented higher elastic modulus, improved temperature, and shear resistance compared to the classically deposited poly(p-xylylene) |
De O.C. Cintra et al. [9] | Surface treatment of CF/PPS via plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition | Experimental/manufacturing | The silicon nitride layer was measured at 275 ± 53 nm |
Giusto et al. [11] | Preliminary design of three composite space-oriented substructures | Manufacturing/design | Automated dry parallel filament winding and resin infusion were proven most efficient |
Vartak et al. [39] | Electrical conductivity enhancement of CFRP via MWCNTs | Experimental/manufacturing | Addition of 0.4% MCNTs enhances the conductivity to meet space-grade requirements |
Seibers et al. [36] | Enhancement of mechanical properties of HDPE for radiation shielding | Experimental/manufacturing | Introduction of alkylated reduced graphene oxide enhanced the tensile modulus by 10–15% |
Lv et al. [31] | Investigation of wear and friction behavior of carbon and aramid fibers | Experimental | CF/polyimide composite presented high wear resistance even in irradiated environments |
Colas et al. [33] | Self-lubrication performance evaluation of four composite types | Experimental | PTFE/(10% MoS2, 25% glass fibers) composition presented the best tribological properties |
Author | Subject | Method | Notable Results |
---|---|---|---|
Huang et al. [45] | Impact performance evaluation of TiB2-based composite shield configuration | Experimental | Smaller debris clouds were produced than aluminum bumpers |
Kim et al. [47] | Examination of Zylon and Twaron composites as front bumpers under high-velocity impact | Experimental | An increase in velocity led to superior results for composites |
Kobzev et al. [46] | Parametric study of composites’ impact toughness | Experimental | Randomly dispersed CNTs enhanced impact toughness by 2.5–3% |
Nam et al. [47] | Proposition of a shielding system with improved microwave absorption performance | Experimental/manufacturing | The structure presented superior impact performance to pristine aramid/epoxy at 2.7–3.2 km/s velocities |
Jaulin et al. [21] | Performance of planar plate impacts and laser shocks at CFRP | Experimental/numerical | The simulation developed was validated for the performed tests |
Author | Subject | Method | Notable Results |
---|---|---|---|
Ferrari et al. [65] | Investigation of the thermal protection performance and heat dissipation of a porous ceramic core | Numerical/ manufacturing/experimental | A low-weight, additively manufactured component was designed with the desired properties |
Dai et al. [67] | Investigation of high-temperature space charge dynamics of composites under high electric field | Experimental | Introduction of micro-nano particles increased the thermal conductivity of the matrix |
Martins et al. [19] | Thermal conductance investigation of CFRP electronic boxes | Manufacturing/experimental | The pitch-based CFRP achieved high thermal conductivity with 23% mass reduction compared to aluminum counterparts |
Hyde [50] | Mechanical/thermal evaluation of ceramic composites | Experimental/manufacturing | Applicability for extreme temperature applications |
Zhang et al. [43] | Mechanical evaluation under simulated space environment | Experimental | 30 MPa strength fluctuation after 100 thermal cycles |
Marchetti et al. [64] | Minimization of manufacturing and thermal distortion | Analytical | [0 ± 60]s layup showed better behavior than cross-plied laminates |
Author | Subject | Method | Notable Results |
---|---|---|---|
Cherkashina et al. [37] | Radiation protection assessment by multilayer polyimide structure containing lead nanoparticles | Experimental | X-ray attenuation coefficients for the structure were 12–15% higher than the predicted values |
Naito et al. [15] | Study on the radiation protection of CF/PEEK | Experimental | The composite materials presented >30% higher shielding efficiency than aluminum |
Cha et al. [38] | Cosmic radiation shielding via HRB/UHMWPE composite | Design/experimental | Apart from excellent electromagnetic absorption, interlaminar shear strength was achieved |
Pellegrini et al. [52] | Replacement of SiC with fully dense ZrB2 and HfB2 for high-temperature oxidation resistance | Manufacturing/experimental | The samples tested showed that the material is not suitable for re-entry applications |
Khan et al. [35] | Investigation of EMI performance and impact resistance of GNP films with glass-fiber-reinforced Elium® composites | Manufacturing/experimental | High EMI shielding effectiveness and superior impact behavior, strength and stiffness compared to pristine GNP/GFRP |
O’Connor et al. [30] | Radiation dose reduction by replacing aluminum with boron carbide composites | Analytical | Dose reduction was measured at 5% for small areal densities and 10–15% for larger areas (>50 g·cm2) |
Author | Subject | Method | Notable Results |
---|---|---|---|
Startsev and Nikishin [23] | Investigation of aging in space environment for hybrid epoxy-based composite | Experimental | The room-temperature composite strength was not degraded after 1501 days in space |
Paillous and Pailler [24] | Simulation of space environment for graphite/epoxy laminates by electron radiation/thermal cycling | Experimental | Significant microcracking was observed causing residual strains and thermal expansion alterations |
Iskanderova et al. [27] | Surface modification by high-dose ion implantation at 10–100 keV for environmental durability enhancement | Analytical/ numerical/ experimental | The modified specimens showed no morphology alteration after exposure to HAO |
He et al. [25] | Evaluation of the simulated atomic oxygen effect, equivalent to 43 days in low orbit, on three composites | Experimental | The exposure resulted in surface erosion, leading to decreased flexural properties |
Author | Subject | Method | Notable Results |
---|---|---|---|
Kollerov et al. [61] | Estimation of the reversible deformation of titanium nickelide fibers’ reinforced composite | Analytical/ experimental | Maximum reversible deformation during thermal cycling can be achieved by selecting the optimal ratio of the rigidity of the matrix and reinforcing fibers |
Moskvichev et al. [58] | Definition of the optimal parameters for preserving reversible behavior for space antenna composite | Experimental | Since temperature severely influences mechanical properties, it should be controlled to ensure proper deploying behavior |
Margoy et al. [59] | Mechanical, thermal, electrical, and deployment dynamics assessment of carbon heating resistive fiber composite | Experimental | The aluminum-coated composite achieved 24% lower electrical power consumption and faster deployment |
Author | Subject | Method | Notable Results |
---|---|---|---|
Andreades et al. [56] | Real-time composite damage detection via PZTs with nonlinear ultrasound | Experimental | Multiple damage locations of different sizes in composites were successfully detected |
Oppili Prasad et al. [57] | Optimization of highly stretchable strain sensors using CNT/PDMS composites | Manufacturing/experimental | A nearly linear strain sensitivity at the 0–5000 μ range was achieved |
Courbon et al. [66] | Enhancement of the thermochemical heat storage of silica gel and CaCl2 composites | Manufacturing/experimental | The method suggested yields to composite with high salt content (i.e., 43 wt% CaCl2) and stability |
Author | Subject | Method | Notable Results |
---|---|---|---|
Echter et al. [54] | Development of a multifunctional composite hinge for deployment of optomechanics equipment and post-deployment corrections | Numerical/experimental | Accuracy for the deployment was achieved via feedback control using Macro Fiber Composite actuators |
You et al. [70] | Simulation of clustered deployable space telescope | Numerical/experimental | The FE model using shell elements in absolute coordinate formulation was validated experimentally at subcomponents |
Pagani et al. [12] | Simulation of the geometrical nonlinear behavior of space booms using the Carrera Unified Formulation (CUF) for ultra-thin shells | Numerical | The used CUF method achieved accurate description of the near- and far-post buckling behavior of the structures |
Morozov et al. [71] | Design of anisogrid composite deployable reflector based on parametric FE simulations | Numerical/design | The helical angle had the most severe impact on the deformability, stress and buckling responses of the structure |
Liu and Bai [72,73] | Folding behavior of deployable composite space cabin via experiments/simulation (Part I) and analytical approach (Part II) | Experimental/numerical/analytical | The proposed DCC consists of a composite circular roof and hollow thin-walled cylindrical composite structures |
Zheng et al. [13] | Optimization of a C-cross section deployable composite structure geometric parameters | Numerical/machine learning | The multi-objective optimization performed led to a space-grade structure according to NSGA-II |
Liu et al. [74] | Investigation of the folding behavior of DCB and geometric parametric study | Analytical | Results show that the opposite-sense folding moment is greater than the equal-sense folding moment |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Tserpes, K.; Sioutis, I. Advances in Composite Materials for Space Applications: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Aerospace 2025, 12, 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12030215
Tserpes K, Sioutis I. Advances in Composite Materials for Space Applications: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Aerospace. 2025; 12(3):215. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12030215
Chicago/Turabian StyleTserpes, Konstantinos, and Ioannis Sioutis. 2025. "Advances in Composite Materials for Space Applications: A Comprehensive Literature Review" Aerospace 12, no. 3: 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12030215
APA StyleTserpes, K., & Sioutis, I. (2025). Advances in Composite Materials for Space Applications: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Aerospace, 12(3), 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12030215