Interlingual Interactions Elicit Performance Mismatches Not “Compromise” Categories in Early Bilinguals: Evidence from Meta-Analysis and Coronal Stops
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
see attached file.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see attached file.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
This is an extremely well written paper that will be a great addition to our knowledge of L2 phonological application. I believe that the manuscript needs very minor changes in order to be accepted.
Minor proofreading should be done, specifically:
- Line 22 > a "compromised" VOT, or, "compromised" VOTs
- Line 179 > type II errors, or, a type II error
- Line 193 > based on
- Line 289 > Figure 2, Amengual, 2011 should be 2012
- Check most cases of ' "compromise" category' as some may need to be rewritten for grammar
Other aspects
- Line 70 > Clarify if this quote comes from Williams 1977 or 1980
- Line 216 > provide citation for this claim
- Lines 237-8> If I read this correctly, these 20 studies are those listed in Figure 2. If this is the case, state that here.
- Considering language activation/mode, it should be noted in either the discussion or the conclusion that there are several ways to go about language activation/mode that are not discussed in this paper but should be considered in future research. E.g., cognates (Amengual's 2012 study cited in this study is a great example).
Author Response
Please see attached file.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Please see attached document with my detailed comments and suggestions for revision
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see attached file.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 3 Report
The author has addressed all comments outlined in the initial review report both comprehensively and effectively. I appreciate the time the author took to carefully respond to and address all comments and concerns raised by reviewers. I have no further comments or requests for edits.
The revised manuscript makes an excellent contribution to the field, and I commend the author for their research and expertise on this topic.
