Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
PharmacyPharmacy
  • Article
  • Open Access

20 January 2018

Pharmacy Practice and Education in Latvia

,
,
,
and
1
Faculty of Medicine, the University of Latvia, 19 Raina Blvd., LV-1001 Riga, Latvia
2
Faculty of Pharmacy, Riga Stradins University, 16 Dzirciema Street, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia
3
Pharmacolor Consultants Nancy, 12 rue de Versigny, 54600 Villers, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Country Profiles of the PHARMINE Survey of European Higher Educational Institutions Delivering Pharmacy Education and Training

Abstract

The PHARMINE (“Pharmacy Education in Europe”) project studied the organisation of pharmacy practice and education in the member states of the European Union (EU). The work was carried out using an electronic survey sent to chosen pharmacy representatives. The surveys of the individual member states are now being published as reference documents. This paper presents the results of the PHARMINE survey on pharmacy practice and education in Latvia. In the light of this, we examine the harmonisation of practice and education in Latvia with EU norms.

1. Introduction

The PHARMINE (“Pharmacy Education in Europe”) consortium surveyed the state of pharmacy practice and education in the member states of the European Union (EU), including Latvia, between 2008 and 2011, with an update in 2017. The methodology used in the PHARMINE study and the principal results obtained have already been published [1].
In the first part of the study, PHARMINE gathered information on general, community practice, on specialised hospital and industrial practice, and on education and traineeship for pharmacists. PHARMINE also dealt with other personnel working in pharmacies such as pharmacists’ assistants: their education, training and responsibilities.
PHARMINE went on to study the legal and administrative context of pharmacy practice and education. In the EU—in contrast to other parts of the world—pharmacy practice and education fall under two jurisdictions: national and European. The latter is confederal both in structure and decision-making. Freedoms of movement, of residence, and of exercise of profession are the cornerstones of the EU. Thus, there is a system of automatic recognition of professional qualifications for seven sectoral professions (nurses, midwives, doctors, dentists, pharmacists, architects and veterinary surgeons). To work in another EU member state, professionals apply to the relevant authority of that country, providing proof of the qualifications (for harmonised EU practice) obtained in their home state. For sectoral professions, the European Commission of the EU issues directives; the latter are ordinances, laying down the broad imperatives, on the practice and education of the given profession [2]. An EU directive requires member states to achieve a particular result—in this case harmonisation of practice and education—without dictating the means of achieving that result. Directives leave the different member states with leeway as to the exact rules to be adopted. Member states may organise systems that are more or less harmonised with the EU paradigm.
In parallel to the above pan-national system, member states may introduce specific national legislation relating to specialised practice, and to ownership and management of pharmacies, for example.
This paper looks at how EU legislation impacts on pharmacy practice and education in Latvia.
Pharmacy education and training in Europe is also influenced by the Bologna agreement on the harmonization of European degree courses, and student and staff exchange [3]. The Bologna agreement, signed by the education ministers of the governments of the European Higher Education Area (48 members including the 28 EU member states), proposes recommendations that are not legally binding. They include a harmonised structure for all university degrees (including pharmacy) with a bachelor (3 years) followed by a master’s (2 years) degree. Here, the Bologna agreement is in opposition to the EU directive. The latter requires a five-year, “tunnel” degree structure for pharmacy, i.e., a degree course that offers no possibility for intermediate entry or exit after (successful) accomplishment of a three-year bachelor period. The idea behind the Bologna recommendation on degree structure is to improve student mobility. Mobility is also behind other Bologna recommendations such as the development of tools to promote student exchange programmes like the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS). This provides credits to students for defined learning outcomes and their associated workload. ECTS are coupled with the Diploma Supplement that describes the nature, level, context, content and status of the studies that were successfully completed by a student at a given university. This system allows students to validate studies carried out at their host university by their home university.
This paper looks at how the Bologna process has developed in Latvian universities. It is particularly interesting to examine how this affects education and practice in a country, Latvia, that has recently joined the EU (2004).
In order to place pharmacy practice within the general health situation in Latvia compared to the EU, it can be noted that life expectancy at birth (Table 1) in Latvia is lower than (males) or equal to (females) the EU average of 79.4 years. Healthy life expectancy (EU average 70.2 years) is much lower in males and slightly lower in females. Furthermore, expenditure on health is much lower than the EU average ($3611 per capita).
Table 1. Health statistics for Latvia [4,5].

2. Design

Information was obtained from two pharmacy departments in Latvia: the University of Latvia (UL, Ruta Muceniece and Una Riekstiņa) and Riga Stradins University (RSU, Baiba Maurina and Vija Enina), which replied to questions on:
  • pharmacy;
    practice (community, hospital and industrial);
    legislation;
    education and training;
  • harmonisation with the EU sectoral directive on pharmacy;
  • harmonisation with the Bologna recommendations (organisation of the degree course with the existence or not of a bachelor/master’s structure, implementation of ECTS and the Erasmus programme on student and staff exchange [6].
An electronic survey methodology was used and data was collected in 2010 and revised in 2017. We attempted at all times to collect objective data.
The information is presented in the form of tables in order to facilitate legibility. This type of presentation was developed in association with the journal’s editorial board and has been described in detail in a previous publication [7]. This format will ease the comparison of different EU countries by students and staff envisaging exchange programmes, and by researchers in pharmacy education and practice.

3. Evaluation and Assessment

3.1. Organisation of the Activities of Pharmacists, Professional Bodies

Table 2 provides details of the numbers and activities of community pharmacists and pharmacies in Latvia. Items are expounded in the “comments” column.
Table 2. Numbers and activities of Latvian community pharmacists and pharmacies [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17].
The data in Table 2 shows that compared to the EU linear regression estimation (for definition and calculation see Reference [1]), the ratio of the actual number of community pharmacists in Latvia (/population) compared to the linear regression estimation for Latvia = 1.09. Thus, the number of pharmacists per population is similar to the EU norm. The same comparison for community pharmacies produces a ratio of 1.24, above the EU norm. The use of the linear regression estimation is based on the following. Results here and elsewhere are not normal in distribution but highly skewed [1]. Skewness was due to the uneven distribution of population in the EU. A small proportion of the population of the EU lives in 18 smaller countries: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia and Sweden, and the larger proportion in 8 larger countries: France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Spain and the United Kingdom. In countries with a larger population, the numbers of pharmacists, etc. are greater. As the number of countries with a small population is large this leads to skewness in the distribution. Therefore, we used an EU linear regression estimation to compare the data for a given country with the EU average. This was calculated taking the numbers of pharmacists, etc. as the dependent variable with the population as the independent variable. The reported number for the country was expressed as a ratio of the number estimated from this linear regression. As the comparison is now with transformed (corrected for population) data that are originally skewed, parametric tests such as the t-test with p values are not given.
The activities and occupations of pharmacists in Latvia are similar to those of community pharmacists in other EU member states [1]; a specificity of Latvia is the existence of internet pharmacy practice.
Table 3 provides details of the numbers and activities of persons other than pharmacists working in pharmacies in Latvia.
Table 3. Numbers and activities of other personnel working in pharmacies in Latvia.
Pharmacists’ assistants work under the supervision of the pharmacist. The legal definition of the profession states: “A pharmacist’s assistant is a health care provider, a specialist who works in pharmacies under the supervision of a pharmacist, and independently may sell health care or body care products, prepares drugs for individual doctor prescriptions or medical institution written requests (extemporal drugs). A pharmacist’s assistant works in wholesale markets and medicines manufacturing plants and carries out duties according to the specifics of the work” [12]. The training and functions of pharmacists’ assistants are harmonised with those in other EU member states [1].
Turning to specialisation in pharmacy practice, Table 4 provides details of the numbers and activities of hospital pharmacists in Latvia.
Table 4. Numbers and activities of hospital pharmacies and pharmacists.
The number of pharmacists working in hospitals is similar to the EU average. The ratio of the actual number compared to the linear regression estimation is 1.23, (for definition and calculation see Reference [1]). The ratio for hospital pharmacies compared to the EU average is 0.82.
Table 5 provides details of the numbers and activities of industrial pharmacists and pharmacists in other sectors, in Latvia.
Table 5. Numbers and activities of industrial pharmacists and pharmacists in other sectors.
Industrial pharmacists in Latvia have similar practices and duties to those in other EU countries [1]. As accurate numbers of industrial pharmacists were not available for most European countries, a comparison with the EU average is not possible. The pharmaceutical market is loss-making in that imports are greater than exports. In 2015, the pharmaceutical trade balance was negative in the majority (16/28) of EU countries including Latvia [24]. The Latvian figure of −€178 million is far less than in some other member states such as Spain (−€2892 million) and Italy (−€2320 million). Other comparisons can be found in Reference [24]. This situation is relatively stable as figures for 2008 [24] show that 15/27 EU countries have a negative pharmaceutical trade balance with Latvia at −€160 million, Spain at −€1710 million and Italy at −€1714 million.
Table 6 provides information on professional associations for pharmacists in Latvia.
Table 6. Professional associations for pharmacists in Latvia.

3.2. Pharmacy Faculties, Students, and Courses

Table 7 provides details of pharmacy higher-education institutions (HEIs), staff and students in Latvia.
Table 7. Pharmacy higher education institutions (HEIs), staff, and students in Latvia [27].
Comparison to the EU average for ratios such as students/staff is difficult given the Latvian situation in which both staff and students can be either full-time or part-time and staff may be attached to the pharmacy department or to another university department.
Table 8 below contains details of specialisation electives.
Table 8. Specialisation electives in pharmacy HEIs.
Table 9 provides details of past and present changes in pharmacy education and training in Latvia.
Table 9. Past and present changes in education and training in Latvian pharmacy HEIs.
The main changes envisaged are the further alignement with EU norms and the introduction of outcomes-based learning of elements in English.

3.3. Teaching and Learning Methods

Table 10 provides details of hours by learning method (for further details on the definitions of the different methods see Reference [1]).
Table 10. Student hours by learning method: University of Latvia (UL, top), Riga Stradins University (RSU, bottom).
The pharmacy programme of UL consists of obligatory and elective courses and includes lectures, seminars, presentation of reports, practicals, and presentation of research projects. Lectures, tutorials and practicals are given in the first 4 years (3 years bachelor programme and 1 year master’s programme with additional work on thesis). Electives are of 2 kinds: compulsory electives are pharmacy-oriented; free-choice electives may be from other programs and other faculties, and can be from the humanities. Traineeship is carried out in the first and second year of master’s programme years. The main components of the courses are lectures (24%), practicals (18%) and project work (24%), with traineeship at 19%. The bachelor thesis provides 15 ECTS and corresponds to 2.5 calendar months; it is an individual research project and so how many hours one needs to work depends on the chosen topic; an estimation is given in Table 10. In the same way, the master’s thesis cannot be calculated in hours. It provides 30 ECTS and corresponds to 5 calendar months or 1 semester. It also is an individual research project. Traineeship is at the end of the programme before the master’s thesis and can be carried out at community pharmacies or 3 months in a community pharmacy plus 3 months at a hospital pharmacy. It is also possible to do 3 months at a pharmacy in another country under the ERASMUS training programme [6] plus 3 months in a Latvian pharmacy.
At RSU there is a substantial number of practical hours (67.5%) that consist of practical work in a laboratory in contact with teaching staff and student’s individual work. Lectures and electives are validated at a session of the faculty committee and then by the University Senate, as is the traineeship that occurs in the 5th year and occupies 13% of the time.

3.4. Subject Areas

Table 11 provides details of student hours by subject area (for further details on the definitions of the subject areas see Reference [1]). Student hours are presence hours, not student workload hours. The generic area includes all issues that do not belong directly to a given appropriate course. For example, the competence to find and read scientific literature, to use library and internet data basis, to make presentations and develop presentation skills, to use computer programs, to write short scientific literature reviews, to use languages (foreign and Latin), and to use simple laboratory techniques, common in all laboratories. For the generic area, an estimation is given as these hours do not constitute a separate course but are embedded in other courses.
Table 11. Student hours by subject area: University of Latvia (UL, top), Riga Stradins University (RSU, bottom).
Taking the MEDISCI/CHEMSCI ratio (950/770 = 1.23 for UL and 1,030/859 = 1.19 for RSU) as an indicator of the nature of the content of the M. Pharm. degree courses [30], it appears that both are balanced; elsewhere in the EU the courses of some member states, e.g., Ireland (ratio = 2.6) are oriented towards medicinal sciences [30]. It should be noted that in a pharmacy department attached to a medical faculty (UL) and a department that is independent (RSU), ratios are very similar, viz 1.23 and 1.19, respectively.
Full details of the programmes are available on the website of the lists of the accredited study programmes at Latvian universities [31]. The difference in the total number of hours between this table and Table 10 is explained by the fact that Table 11 concerns, essentially, contact hours whereas Table 10 concerns student hours.
At RSU in each study year students have the opportunity to choose elective courses. The hours spent for each area depends on the student’s choice; for example, a student can increase his/her PHARMTECH knowledge by choosing “Drug registration” or his/her BIOLSCI knowledge by choosing “Pharmaco-genetics”.

3.5. Impact of the Bologna Principles [3]

Table 12 provides details the various ways in which the Bologna declaration impacts on the pharmacy HEIs of Latvia.
Table 12. Ways in which the Bologna declaration impacts on Latvian pharmacy HEIs.
Regarding the accreditation of courses, when opening a new programme universities have to receive a license from the government ensuring that the methodologies and procedures of the external evaluation of the quality of the study programme comply with the standards and guidelines developed by the European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education [24]. Only licensed programmes can be opened and, after their first year, can apply for accreditation. The accreditation of programmes is obligatory. The maximal accreditation term is 6 years. After that, re-accreditation or closure follows. Each year a self-assessment of programmes is written and student feedback is gathered after each semester and after each course. The internal quality assurance of the faculty and university system complies with the standards and guidelines for quality assurance in higher education developed by ENQA [34]. The internal quality assurance system is implemented at the level of faculty and university and is built on the ENQA guidelines, which determine the procedures for approval and periodic evaluation of the programme and the degree awarded, student assessment, academic staff quality, training tools and resources to help students, as well as information systems and public information. Quality assurance is built on internal and external audits, election of the academic staff, and competition for administration positions. The implementation, objectives, and learning outcomes of the programme, as well as the learning process, resources, partnerships, and management systems are reviewed on a regular basis. All study programmes are constantly accredited and re-accredited.
As the courses are based on EU norms, harmonisation does not appear to be a major problem, whereas economic and language difficulties are obstacles to exchange.

3.6. Impact of European Union (EU) Directive 2013/55/EC [2]

Table 13 provides details the various ways in which the EC directive impacts on pharmacy education and training in Latvia.
Table 13. Ways in which elements of the European Commission (EC) directive (left column) impact on Latvian pharmacy HEIs.
Latvia mainly conforms to the different aspects of the EU directive with, notably, a tunnel degree.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

Community pharmacies in Latvia sell Rx (prescription) and OTC (over-the-counter) medicines, and provide consulting and diagnostic services.
Pharmacists study five years at one of two universities—UL and RSU. At UL, the programme is based on a bachelor plus master’s 3 + 2 years system; graduates receive a health sciences bachelor degree in pharmacy followed by a health sciences master’s degree in pharmacy. At RSU, after a seamless 5-years’ programme, graduates receive a pharmacist’s degree.
The pharmacy curriculum is organized according to the EU directive 2013/55/EU and has the required courses in medical, biological and pharmaceutical subjects, as well as courses in physics, languages, and social science. There is a six months’ traineeship in pharmacy at the master’s level, following the end of theoretical courses. Both the UL and RSU degree courses are thus adapted to the Bologna principles of student exchange under ERASMUS and other systems. In both courses, “fundamental” sciences such as CHEMSCI, PHYSMATH and BIOLSCI figure mainly in the first 3 years (Table 11), whereas more advanced “pharmaceutical” subjects such as MEDISCI are taught throughout the course i.e., including and up to the end of the 4th year. The 5th year is mainly dedicated to traineeship (Table 10) as in other EU member states [1]. This chronological coincidence amongst member states in the teaching of subject areas and in traineeship, within the 5-year course, should facilitate student exchange. The latter appears to be more impacted by economic and language problems than by harmonisation.
After three years of practice, university graduates receive a pharmacist’s certificate. Pharmacists may own and manage community pharmacies or work at community and hospital pharmacies. The Pharmacy Law of Latvia states that new pharmacies may be opened in the form of a pharmacist’s practice, joint practice, or a private company. A pharmacy belonging to a municipality has to be headed by a certified pharmacist. A closed-type pharmacy may be opened by a hospital or a day-care facility. After three years of practice, university graduates receive a pharmacist’s certificate. To obtain this certificate they have to pass an examination and the certificate is valid for 5 years. During this period, pharmacists have to continue their education and collect 200 academic hours from participation in professional courses, workshops, seminars, etc. After that, pharmacists may apply to the Certification Commission for prolongation of their certificate. In practice, new pharmacies are not being opened and the majority of existing pharmacies now belong to pharmacy chains. Recent amendments to the Pharmacy Law state that a general pharmacy may be established in the form of a pharmacist’s practice, a joint practice (a civil law company) or a capital company. If the owner is not a pharmacist, he/she must to conclude a contract with a certified pharmacist providing pharmaceutical care. If the pharmacy takes the form of a capital company either a pharmacist must be a shareholder of not less than 50% of the capital, or certified pharmacists must comprise not less than half of the board members.
Pharmacists’ assistants study for 2.5 years at RMC and RCMC; they are employed at community or hospital pharmacies but are not allowed to manage a pharmacy.
Individual specialisation is possible during the bachelor and master’s degree theses by choosing a specific laboratory for a thesis in an appropriate topic, and also by choosing the appropriate elective courses. Specialisation is not obligatory, and students may choose more practical pharmacy or clinical courses. RSU offers specialisation programmes in master’s level clinical pharmacy and industrial pharmacy. Pharmacists are primarily employed in community pharmacies.
Coming back to the observation in the introduction that the health status and context in Latvia is below the EU average (Table 1), the PHARMINE survey shows that such an observation does not result from a lack of education or practice, which are similar to EU norms. It may be that the answer to this dilemma would be a re-orientation and extension of pharmacy services in areas such as diagnostics, pharmaceutical care, especially concerning chronic illness in the elderly, vaccinations, public health campaigns, etc. Community and hospital pharmacists actively participate in public health activities. For example, together with medical students they measure blood pressure and glucose levels of volunteers in city parks and trains. Pharmacies also organize open days together with distributors of medical devices, such as demonstrations on how to measure bone density, to control obesity, to calculate body mass index, and to evaluate hepatic steatosis. While there is still some way to go until the people of Latvia reach the average health level of European countries, pharmacy practice and education seem well adapted to help in this process. Finally it should be noted that many variables contribute to health disparities within and between countries. Pharmacy may play a part but other influences are much stronger. For example, the cost of health care and access to it are major determinants of health status.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the following people who contributed to the survey: Inta Saprovska, Latvian Branch, European Industrial Pharmacists’ Group (EIPG), isaprovska@gmail.com, SIA Berlin-Chemie/Menarini Baltic, Bauskas street 58a-605, Riga, LV-1004, Latvia, isaprovska@berlin-chemie.com, and www.menarini.lv; Anita Senberga, Industrial Pharmacists’ Society Section of the Pharmacists’ Society of Latvia, Pils iela 21, Rīga, LV-1050, Latvia, anita.senberga@inbox.lv and https://www.farmaceitubiedriba.lv/; and are grateful for the support of the Lifelong Learning Programme of the EU (142078-llp-1-2008-BE-ERASMUS-ECDSP).

Author Contributions

Ruta Muceniece, Una Riekstina, Baiba Maurina and Vija Enina provided data and information, and helped with the revisions of the manuscript; Jeffrey Atkinson formatted the data, wrote the manuscript and coordinated the revisions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Atkinson, J.; Rombaut, B. The 2011 PHARMINE report on pharmacy and pharmacy education in the European Union. Pharm. Pract. 2011, 9, 169–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. The European Commission Directive 2013/55/EU on Education and Training for Sectoral Practice Such as That of Pharmacy. Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/?uri=celex:32013L0055 (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  3. The European Higher Education Area (EHEA)—Bologna Agreement of Harmonisation of European University Degree Courses. Available online: http://www.ehea.info/ (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  4. World Health Organisation (WHO). Global Health Observatory Statistics 2016. Available online: http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/2016/Annex_B/en/ (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  5. The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). Health Expenditure and Financing. Available online: http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SHA (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  6. Erasmus Programme for Student and Staff Exchange in the EU. Available online: https://info.erasmusplus.fr/ (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  7. Atkinson, J. The Country Profiles of the PHARMINE Survey of European Higher Educational Institutions Delivering Pharmacy Education and Training. Pharmacy 2017, 3, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. The Register of the Pharmacists’ Society of Latvia (PhSL). Available online: https://www.farmaceitubiedriba.lv/en/structure (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  9. The Pharmacy Department of Ministry of Health. Available online: http://farmacija-mic.lv/aptiekas/ (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  10. The Register of Community Pharmacies. Available online: http://www.zva.gov.lv/doc_upl/A-02032010.pdf (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  11. The Latvian State Statistical Board. Available online: www.vm.gov.lv (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  12. Ministry of Health. Laws and Regulations. Available online: www.likumi.lv/ (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  13. Latvian Pharmacists Society. Available online: www.farmaceitubiedriba.lv (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  14. The State Agency of Medicines. Available online: www.zva.gov.lv (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  15. The Latvian Centre of Health Economics. Available online: www.vec.gov.lv (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  16. The Latvian Medicine Information Centre MIC. Available online: www.farmacija-mic.lv (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  17. Latvian Law on the Localisation of Pharmacies and Branch Pharmacies. Available online: http://www.likumi.lv/doc.php?id=60589&from=off (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  18. The European Council Directive 92/51/EEC on a Second General System for the Recognition of Professional Education and Training. Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=LEGISSUM:c11022c&from=EN (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  19. The Latvian Accreditation Centre (Higher Education Quality Evaluation Centre (HEQEC)). Available online: http://www.aiknc.lv/lv/prog_view.php?id=5517 (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  20. The Clinical Pharmacy Master Degree Programme at RSU. Available online: http://www.rsu.lv/eng/study-here/post-graduate/public-health (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  21. The Latvian Pharmacists’ Society, Member of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP). Available online: http://www.eahp.eu/about-us/members/latvia (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  22. The Certus Report on the Latvian Pharmaceutical Industry. Available online: http://certusdomnica.lv/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Certus_Farmacija_2016.pdf (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  23. Zāļu Patēriņa Statistika. Statistics on Medicines Consumption. 2016. Available online: https://www.zva.gov.lv/doc_upl/zva-zstat-2016.pdf?b (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  24. The European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA). The Pharmaceutical Industry in Figures, Key Data 2017 and 2009. Available online: https://www.efpia.eu/publications/data-center/ (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  25. The Latvian Industrial Pharmacists’ Society as a Member of the European Industrial Pharmacists’ Group (EIPG). Available online: http://eipg.eu/member-states/ (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  26. The Latvian National Accreditation Bureau (LATAK). Available online: http://www.latak.lv/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=83&Itemid=160&lang=en (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  27. The Ministry of Education and Science. Available online: www.izm.gov.lv (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  28. State Statistics Agency—Statistics on the Demands for University Programmes. Available online: https://www.latvija.lv/epakalpojumi/ep190 (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  29. RSU: Statistics on Acceptance. Available online: https://www.rsu.lv/studiju-iespejas/uznemsana/uznemsanas-statistika (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  30. Atkinson, J.; De Paepe, K.; Sánchez Pozo, A.; Rekkas, D.; Volmer, D.; Hirvonen, J.; Bozic, B.; Skowron, A.; Mircioiu, C.; Marcincal, A.; et al. Does the Subject Content of the Pharmacy Degree Course Influence the Community Pharmacist’s Views on Competencies for Practice? Pharmacy 2015, 3, 137–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. The Lists of the Accredited Study Programmes at Latvian Universities. Available online: http://svr.aic.lv/Forms/ProgrammesList.aspx?gr=1&cc=1&cp=0 (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  32. The Latvian Higher Education Quality Agency (AIKA). Available online: http://www.aika.lv/ (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  33. The European University Association. Available online: http://www.eua.be/ (accessed on 5 October 2017).
  34. European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education for the Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. Available online: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/275563-studiju-programmu-licencesanas-noteikumi in EN (accessed on 5 October 2017).

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.