High School Course-Completion Trajectories and College Pathways for All: A Transcript Analysis Study on Elective Computer Science Courses
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- What are the distinctive patterns of high school coursework across seven subjects at each grade level?
- Linking the patterns and transitions between patterns across grade levels together, what are the major trajectories of coursework in high school? How are varying trajectories of coursework associated with postsecondary enrollment?
- How does students’ sociodemographic background shape coursework trajectories over time?
2. Review of Relevant Literature
2.1. Navigating through High School Curriculum: A Life Course Perspective
2.2. Computer Science Coursework in High School
2.3. Sociodemographic Disparities in High School Coursework and Postsecondary Enrollment
2.4. Current Study
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Sample and Data
3.2. Measures
3.2.1. Course-Completion Patterns in High School
3.2.2. College Attendance
3.2.3. Standardized Test Scores
3.2.4. Sociodemographic Backgrounds
3.3. Analysis
3.4. Missing Data
4. Results
4.1. Diversity of Course-Completion Patterns
4.2. Mobility and Inertia in Coursework Trajectories and Sociodemographic Disparities
4.3. Pathways to College
5. Discussion and Implications
5.1. High School Coursework Patterns and Trajectories in CS Fields
5.2. Pathways to College
5.3. Implications
5.4. Limitations
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ma, J.; Pender, M.; Welch, M. Education Pays 2016: The Benefits of Higher Education for Individuals and Society; College Board: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Jepsen, C.; Troske, K.; Coomes, P. The Labor-Market Returns to Community College Degrees, Diplomas, and Certificates. J. Labor Econ. 2014, 32, 95–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Adelman, C. Answers in the Tool Box: Academic Intensity, Attendance Patterns, and Bachelor’s Degree Attainment; Department of Education: Washington, DC, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J.; Kim, J.; Desjardins, S.L.; McCall, B.P. Completing Algebra II in High School: Does it Increase College Access and Success? J. High. Educ. 2015, 86, 628–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tierney, W.G.; Garcia, L.D. Postsecondary Remediation Interventions and Policies. Am. Behav. Sci. 2011, 55, 99–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Attewell, P.; Domina, T. Raising the Bar: Curricular Intensity and Academic Performance. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 2008, 30, 51–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goode, J.; Flapan, J.; Margolis, J. Computer Science for All: A School Reform Framework for Broadening Participation in Computing. In Diversifying Digital Learning: Online Literacy and Educational Opportunity; Tierney, W.G., Corwin, Z.B., Ochsner, A., Eds.; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2018; pp. 45–65. [Google Scholar]
- Goode, J.; Estrella, R.; Margolis, J. Lost in Translation: Gender and High School Computer Science. In Women and Information Technology: Research on Underrepresentation; Cohoon, J.M., Aspray, W., Eds.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2006; pp. 89–113. [Google Scholar]
- So, W.W.M. Does computation technology matter in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) projects? Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2021. [CrossRef]
- Paz, T.; Levy, D. Introducing computer science to educationally disadvantaged high school students. Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2005, 23, 229–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perna, L.W. Differences in the Decision to Attend College among African Americans, Hispanics, and Whites. J. High. Educ. 2000, 71, 117–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elder, G.H. Age Differentiation and the Life Course. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 1975, 1, 165–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elde, G.H., Jr. Time, Human Agency, and Social Change: Perspectives on the Life Course. Soc. Psychol. Q. 1994, 57, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elder, G.H. The Life Course as Developmental Theory. Child Dev. 1998, 69, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crosnoe, R.; Benner, A.D. Educational Pathways. In Handbook of the Life Course; Shanahan, M.J., Mortimer, J.T., Johnson, M.K., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; Volume II, pp. 179–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crosnoe, R.; Johnson, M.K. Research on Adolescence in the Twenty-First Century. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2011, 37, 439–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Powell, A.G.; Farrar, E.; Cohen, D.K. The Shopping Mall High School. In NASSP Bulletin; Houghton Mifflin Company: Boston, MA, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Schneider, B.; Swanson, C.B.; Riegle-Crumb, C. Opportunities For Learning: Course Sequences and Positional Advantages. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 1997, 2, 25–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blossfeld, P.N.; Blossfeld, G.J.; Blossfeld, H.-P. Changes in Educational Inequality in Cross-National Perspective. In Hand-Book of the Life Course; Shanahan, M.J., Mortimer, J.T., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 223–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riegle-Crumb, C. The Path through Math: Course Sequences and Academic Performance at the Intersection of Race-Ethnicity and Gender. Am. J. Educ. 2006, 113, 101–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gaertner, M.N.; Kim, J.; DesJardins, S.L.; McClarty, K.L. Preparing Students for College and Careers: The Causal Role of Algebra II. Res. High. Educ. 2013, 55, 143–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, M.C.; Conger, D.; Iatarola, P. Effects of High School Course-Taking on Secondary and Postsecondary Success. Am. Educ. Res. J. 2012, 49, 285–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altonji, J.G.; Blom, E.; Meghir, C. Heterogeneity in Human Capital Investments: High School Curriculum, College Major, and Careers. Annu. Rev. Econ. 2012, 4, 185–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aughinbaugh, A. The effects of high school math curriculum on college attendance: Evidence from the NLSY97. Econ. Educ. Rev. 2012, 31, 861–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horn, L.; Kojaku, L.K.; MPR Associates, Inc. High School Academic Curriculum and the Persistence Path through College: Persistence and Transfer Behavior of Undergraduates 3 Years after Entering 4-Year Institutions; U.S. Department of Education: Washington, DC, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Tyson, W.; Lee, R.; Borman, K.M.; Hanson, M.A. Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Pathways: High School Science and Math Coursework and Postsecondary Degree Attainment. J. Educ. Stud. Placed Risk (JESPAR) 2007, 12, 243–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aschbacher, P.R.; Li, E.; Roth, E.J. Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2009, 47, 564–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davenport, J.E.C.; Davison, M.L.; Kuang, H.; Ding, S.; Kim, S.-K.; Kwak, N. High School Mathematics Course-Taking by Gender and Ethnicity. Am. Educ. Res. J. 1998, 35, 497–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McFarland, D.A. Curricular Flows: Trajectories, Turning Points, and Assignment Criteria in High School Math Careers. Sociol. Educ. 2006, 79, 177–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schiller, K.S.; Schmidt, W.; Muller, C.; Houang, R.T. Hidden Disparities: How Courses and Curricula Shape Opportunities in Mathematics during High School. Equity Excel. Educ. 2010, 43, 414–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Adelman, C. The Toolbox Revisited: Paths to Degree Completion from High School through College; Department of Education: Washington, DC, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Tucker, A.; Deek, F.; Jones, J.; McCowan, D.; Stephenson, C.; Verno, A. A Model Curriculum for K-12 Computer Science: Final Report of the ACM K-12 Task Force Curriculum Committee; Association for Computing Machinery, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Sax, L.J.; Blaney, J.M.; Lehman, K.J.; Rodriguez, S.L.; George, K.L.; Zavala, C. Sense of Belonging in Computing: The Role of Introductory Courses for Women and Underrepresented Minority Students. Soc. Sci. 2018, 7, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, C.; Kang, J.M.; Sonnert, G.; Sadler, P.M. High School Calculus and Computer Science Course Taking as Predictors of Success in Introductory College Computer Science. In ACM Transactions on Computing Education; Association for Computing Machinery, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2020; Volume 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saw, G.; Chang, C.-N.; Chan, H.-Y. Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Disparities in STEM Career Aspirations at the Intersection of Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status. Educ. Res. 2018, 47, 525–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lucas, S.R.; Berends, M. Sociodemographic Diversity, Correlated Achievement, and de Facto Tracking. Sociol. Educ. 2002, 75, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oakes, J.; Guiton, G. Matchmaking: The Dynamics of High School Tracking Decisions. Am. Educ. Res. J. 1995, 32, 3–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piccarreta, R.; Studer, M. Holistic analysis of the life course: Methodological challenges and new perspectives. Adv. Life Course Res. 2018, 41, 100251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Texas Education Agency. Grade-Level Retention in Texas Public Schools, 2006–2007; Texas Education Agency: Austin, TX, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Meredith, W.; Tisak, J. Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika 1990, 55, 107–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nylund-Gibson, K.; Grimm, R.; Quirk, M.; Furlong, M. A Latent Transition Mixture Model Using the Three-Step Specification. Struct. Equ. Model. A Multidiscip. J. 2014, 21, 439–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Asparouhov, T.; Muthén, B. Auxiliary Variables in Mixture Modeling: Three-Step Approaches Using Mplus. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 2014, 21, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lent, R.W.; Brown, S.D. Social cognitive model of career self-management: Toward a unifying view of adaptive career behavior across the life span. J. Couns. Psychol. 2013, 60, 557–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- College Board. Choosing Your AP Courses. Available online: https://apstudents.collegeboard.org/choosing-courses (accessed on 3 November 2022).
- Margolis, J.; Goode, J.; Chapman, G. An equity lens for scaling: A Critical Juncture for Exploring Computer Science. ACM Inroads 2015, 6, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robnett, R.D.; Nelson, P.A.; Zurbriggen, E.L.; Crosby, F.J.; Chemers, M.M. Research mentoring and scientist identity: Insights from undergraduates and their mentors. Int. J. STEM Educ. 2018, 5, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Syed, M.; Azmitia, M.; Cooper, C.R. Identity and Academic Success among Underrepresented Ethnic Minorities: An Interdisciplinary Review and Integration. J. Soc. Issues 2011, 67, 442–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paulsen, M.B.; John, E.P.S. Social Class and College Costs: Examining the Financial Nexus between College Choice and Persistence. J. High. Educ. 2002, 73, 189–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bettinger, E.P.; Long, B.T.; Oreopoulos, P.; Sanbonmatsu, L. The Role of Application Assistance and Information in College Decisions: Results from the H&R Block Fafsa Experiment. Q. J. Econ. 2012, 127, 1205–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kofoed, M.S. To Apply or Not to Apply: FAFSA Completion and Financial Aid Gaps. Res. High. Educ. 2016, 58, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, A.P.; Smith, S.A.; Hill, C.L. Academic Persistence Among Native American College Students. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 2003, 44, 548–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fong, C.J.; Alejandro, A.J.; Krou, M.R.; Segovia, J.; Johnston-Ashton, K. Ya’at’eeh: Race-reimaged belongingness factors, academic outcomes, and goal pursuits among Indigenous community college students. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2019, 59, 101805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guillory, R.M.; Wolverton, M. It’s about Family: Native American Student Persistence in Higher Education. J. High. Educ. 2008, 79, 58–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryoo, J.; Goode, J.; Margolis, J. It takes a village: Supporting inquiry- and equity-oriented computer science pedagogy through a professional learning community. Comput. Sci. Educ. 2015, 25, 351–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu-El-Haija, L.; Payton, F.C. A Plan to Offer Computer Science Classes in All North Carolina High Schools. Issues Sci. Technol. 2021, 37, 16–18. [Google Scholar]
- Fields, D.A.; Kafai, Y.; Nakajima, T.; Goode, J.; Margolis, J. Putting Making into High School Computer Science Classrooms: Promoting Equity in Teaching and Learning with Electronic Textiles in Exploring Computer Science. Equity Excell. Educ. 2018, 51, 21–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Husman, J.; Scott, K.A.; Eggum-Wilkens, N.D. COMPUGIRLS: Stepping Stone to Future Computer-Based Technology Pathways. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 2015, 52, 199–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, X.; Chan, H.-Y. Does Delivery Location Matter? A National Study of the Impact of Dual Enrollment on College Readiness and Early Academic Momentum. Teach. Coll. Rec. Voice Sch. Educ. 2021, 123, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gottfried, M.A.; Plasman, J.S. Linking the Timing of Career and Technical Education Coursetaking with High School Dropout and College-Going Behavior. Am. Educ. Res. J. 2017, 55, 325–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable | Definition | % |
---|---|---|
Outcome variable | ||
College enrollment | Highest level of college ever enrolled | |
4-year college | 43.2% | |
2-year college | 28.1% | |
No attendance + | 28.7% | |
Sociodemographic background | ||
Gender: Female | Self-report gender at 9th grade | 51.8% |
Gender: Male + | 48.2% | |
Race/ethnicity: Native American | Self-report race/ethnicity status at 9th grade | 0.3% |
Race/ethnicity: Asian American | 3.8% | |
Race/ethnicity: African American | 13.0% | |
Race/ethnicity: Latinx | 36.2% | |
Race/ethnicity: European American + | 46.7% | |
English proficiency: Limited | Limited English proficiency status at 9th grade | 3.8% |
English proficiency: Proficient + | 96.2% | |
SES: Economically disadvantaged | Eligibility of free/reduced lunch program at 9th grade | 37.7% |
SES: Not economically disadvantaged + | 62.3% | |
Special education: Being placed in the individualized education program | Whether students were placed in individualized education program at 9th grade | 4.1% |
Special education: Not being placed in the individualized education program + | 95.9% |
Grade Level | Number of Profile | Akaike Information Criterion | Bayesian Information Criterion | Adjusted Bayesian Information Criterion | Voung–Lo–Mendell–Rubin Test | Lo–Mendell–Rubin Adjusted Likelihood Ratio Test |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9th | 1 | 116,040.08 | 116,151.62 | 116,107.12 | -- | -- |
9th | 2 | 95,754.80 | 95,930.07 | 95,860.15 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
9th | 3 | 22,065.15 | 22,304.16 | 22,208.82 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
10th | 1 | 143,918.11 | 144,029.53 | 143,985.04 | -- | -- |
10th | 2 | 89,597.60 | 89,772.70 | 89,702.78 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
10th | 3 | 74,134.92 | 74,373.69 | 74,278.35 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
10th | 4 | 61,801.55 | 62,103.99 | 61,983.23 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
11th | 1 | 197,107.32 | 197,218.66 | 197,174.17 | -- | -- |
11th | 2 | 186,898.03 | 187,072.99 | 187,003.07 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
11th | 3 | 133,827.15 | 134,065.73 | 133,970.39 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
11th | 4 | (no convergence) | ||||
12th | 1 | 231,067.53 | 231,178.82 | 231,134.33 | -- | -- |
12th | 2 | 191,896.26 | 192,071.14 | 192,001.23 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
12th | 3 | 172,684.49 | 172,922.97 | 172,827.63 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
12th | 4 | 159,766.47 | 160,068.54 | 159,947.78 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
12th | 5 | (no convergence) |
9th-grade Pattern | 10th-grade Pattern | Auxiliary Variable | Logit | SE | OR |
Trailing | |||||
CS-intensive | |||||
(threshold) | −2.04 | 0.09 | |||
Female | −0.45 | 0.12 | 0.64 *** | ||
Limited English proficiency status | −0.22 | 0.28 | |||
Economically disadvantaged | −0.62 | 0.18 | 0.54 ** | ||
Individualized education program placement | −0.46 | 0.24 | |||
Native American | 1.76 | 1.45 | |||
Asian American | 1.03 | 0.33 | 2.79 ** | ||
African American | −0.26 | 0.26 | |||
Latinx | −0.45 | 0.19 | 0.64 * | ||
Regular | |||||
CS-intensive | |||||
(threshold) | −2.04 | 0.09 | |||
Female | −0.48 | 0.07 | 0.62 *** | ||
Limited English proficiency status | −0.38 | 0.35 | |||
Economically disadvantaged | −0.19 | 0.10 | 0.82 * | ||
Individualized education program placement | −0.37 | 0.23 | |||
Native American | −0.03 | 0.60 | |||
Asian American | 0.80 | 0.12 | 2.23 *** | ||
African American | −0.37 | 0.14 | 0.69 ** | ||
Latinx | −0.51 | 0.12 | 0.60 *** | ||
10th-grade Pattern | 11th-grade Pattern | Auxiliary Variable | Logit | SE | OR |
CS-intensive | |||||
Trailing | |||||
(threshold) | −1.35 | 0.08 | |||
Female | −0.52 | 0.25 | 0.59 * | ||
Limited English proficiency status | −0.05 | 0.54 | |||
Economically disadvantaged | −0.14 | 0.28 | |||
Individualized education program placement | 0.01 | 0.56 | |||
Native American | N/A | N/A | |||
Asian American | −0.48 | 0.63 | |||
African American | 0.40 | 0.34 | |||
Latinx | 0.51 | 0.27 | |||
Standardized test score: Reading | −0.23 | 0.14 | |||
Standardized test score: Math | −0.95 | 0.21 | 0.39 *** | ||
11th-grade Pattern | 12th-grade Pattern | Auxiliary Variable | Logit | SE | OR |
Trailing | |||||
CS-intensive | |||||
(threshold) | −1.85 | 0.06 | |||
Female | −0.65 | 0.25 | 0.52 ** | ||
Limited English proficiency status | 0.60 | 0.61 | |||
Economically disadvantaged | −0.89 | 0.27 | 0.41 *** | ||
Individualized education program placement | 0.30 | 0.41 | |||
Native American | 2.12 | 1.11 | |||
Asian American | N/A | N/A | |||
African American | 0.001 | 0.35 | |||
Latinx | −0.52 | 0.32 | |||
Regular | |||||
CS-intensive | |||||
(threshold) | −1.85 | 0.06 | |||
Female | −0.30 | 0.06 | 0.74 *** | ||
Limited English proficiency status | 0.30 | 0.25 | |||
Economically disadvantaged | −0.04 | 0.09 | |||
Individualized education program placement | −0.05 | 0.17 | |||
Native American | −0.21 | 0.54 | |||
Asian American | 0.54 | 0.12 | 1.71 *** | ||
African American | −0.05 | 0.11 | |||
Latinx | −0.24 | 0.10 | 0.79 * | ||
12th-grade Pattern | Highest Level of College Education | Auxiliary Variable | Logit | SE | OR |
CS-intensive | |||||
4-year | |||||
(threshold) | −15.14 | 0.93 | |||
Female | 1.58 | 0.68 | 4.83 * | ||
Limited English proficiency status | −6.59 | 1.68 | 0.001 *** | ||
Economically disadvantaged | −8.66 | 1.11 | <0.001 *** | ||
Individualized education program placement | −0.74 | 1.60 | |||
Native American | −6.55 | 0.94 | 0.001 *** | ||
Asian American | 12.95 | 1.56 | -- *** | ||
African American | 2.77 | 1.30 | 15.92 * | ||
Latinx | 1.18 | 1.00 | |||
CS-intensive | |||||
2-year | |||||
(threshold) | −3.53 | 0.98 | |||
Female | 1.31 | 0.68 | |||
Limited English proficiency status | −4.95 | 1.55 | 0.01 ** | ||
Economically disadvantaged | −8.07 | 1.11 | <0.001 *** | ||
Individualized education program placement | 1.34 | 1.54 | |||
Native American | N/A | N/A | |||
Asian American | 12.04 | 1.58 | -- *** | ||
African American | 2.50 | 1.31 | |||
Latinx | 1.18 | 1.01 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chan, H.-Y.; Ma, T.-L.; Saw, G.K.; Huang, Y.-M. High School Course-Completion Trajectories and College Pathways for All: A Transcript Analysis Study on Elective Computer Science Courses. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 808. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110808
Chan H-Y, Ma T-L, Saw GK, Huang Y-M. High School Course-Completion Trajectories and College Pathways for All: A Transcript Analysis Study on Elective Computer Science Courses. Education Sciences. 2022; 12(11):808. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110808
Chicago/Turabian StyleChan, Hsun-Yu, Ting-Lan Ma, Guan K. Saw, and Yen-Ming Huang. 2022. "High School Course-Completion Trajectories and College Pathways for All: A Transcript Analysis Study on Elective Computer Science Courses" Education Sciences 12, no. 11: 808. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110808
APA StyleChan, H. -Y., Ma, T. -L., Saw, G. K., & Huang, Y. -M. (2022). High School Course-Completion Trajectories and College Pathways for All: A Transcript Analysis Study on Elective Computer Science Courses. Education Sciences, 12(11), 808. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110808